{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman{\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f1\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604020202020204}Arial;}{\f2\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 02070309020205020404}Courier New;}{\f3\froman\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05050102010706020507}Symbol;}
{\f4\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604020202020204}Helvetica;}{\f5\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 02070409020205020404}Courier{\*\falt Courier New};}{\f6\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603040505020304}Tms Rmn;}
{\f7\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604020202030204}Helv;}{\f8\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02040503060506020304}New York;}{\f9\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}System;}
{\f10\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05000000000000000000}Wingdings;}{\f11\fmodern\fcharset128\fprq1{\*\panose 02020609040205080304}MS Mincho{\*\falt ?l?r ??\'81\'66c};}
{\f12\froman\fcharset129\fprq2{\*\panose 02030600000101010101}Batang{\*\falt \'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7E\'a2\'aeEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7EcEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE};}
{\f13\fnil\fcharset134\fprq2{\*\panose 02010600030101010101}SimSun{\*\falt ??????????\'a8\'ac?????};}{\f14\fnil\fcharset136\fprq2{\*\panose 02010601000101010101}PMingLiU{\*\falt !Ps2OcuAe};}
{\f15\fmodern\fcharset128\fprq1{\*\panose 020b0609070205080204}MS Gothic{\*\falt ?l?r ?S?V?b?N};}
{\f16\fmodern\fcharset129\fprq1{\*\panose 020b0600000101010101}Dotum{\*\falt \'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7EcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7E\'a2\'aeEcEcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7E\'a2\'aeEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE};}
{\f17\fmodern\fcharset134\fprq1{\*\panose 02010600030101010101}SimHei{\*\falt o??????????????????????????????};}{\f18\fmodern\fcharset136\fprq1{\*\panose 02010609000101010101}MingLiU{\*\falt 2OcuAe};}
{\f19\froman\fcharset128\fprq1{\*\panose 02020609040305080305}Mincho{\*\falt ??\'81\'66c};}
{\f20\froman\fcharset129\fprq1{\*\panose 020b0600000101010101}Gulim{\*\falt \'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7E\'a2\'aeEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7EcEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE};}
{\f21\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02040604050505020304}Century;}{\f22\froman\fcharset222\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Angsana New;}{\f23\froman\fcharset222\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0304020202020204}Cordia New;}
{\f24\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}Mangal;}{\f25\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}Latha;}{\f26\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 010a0502050306030303}Sylfaen;}
{\f27\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 01010600010101010101}Vrinda;}{\f28\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}Raavi;}{\f29\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}Shruti;}
{\f30\froman\fcharset1\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}Sendnya;}{\f31\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}Gautami;}{\f32\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}Tunga;}
{\f33\froman\fcharset1\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Estrangella Edessa;}{\f34\fswiss\fcharset128\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604020202020204}Arial Unicode MS;}{\f35\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604030504040204}Tahoma;}
{\f36\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}DejaVu Sans;}{\f37\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603060405020304}Times{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f38\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Marlett;}
{\f39\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 020b0609040504020204}Lucida Console;}{\f40\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604030504040204}Verdana;}{\f41\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0a04020102020204}Arial Black;}
{\f42\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 030f0702030302020204}Comic Sans MS;}{\f43\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0806030902050204}Impact;}{\f44\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02040502050405020303}Georgia;}
{\f45\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0603020102020204}Franklin Gothic Medium;}{\f46\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02040502050505030304}Palatino Linotype;}{\f47\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0603020202020204}Trebuchet MS;}
{\f48\froman\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05030102010509060703}Webdings;}{\f49\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2 Estrangelo Edessa;}{\f50\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2 MV Boli;}{\f51\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604020202020204}Microsoft Sans Serif;}
{\f52\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}Alba;}{\f53\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}Alba Matter;}{\f54\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}Alba Super;}
{\f55\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}Baby Kruffy;}{\f56\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000900000000000000}Chick;}{\f57\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}Croobie;}
{\f58\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}Fat;}{\f59\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}Freshbot;}{\f60\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}Frosty;}
{\f61\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}GlooGun;}{\f62\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}Jenkins v2.0;}{\f63\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}Jokewood;}
{\f64\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}Poornut;}{\f65\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000900000000000000}Porky's;}{\f66\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}Pussycat;}
{\f67\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}Weltron Urban;}{\f68\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03090702030407020403}Mistral;}{\f69\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0602030504020204}Lucida Sans Unicode;}
{\f70\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04020505051007020d02}Blackadder ITC;}{\f71\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03070402050302030203}Bradley Hand ITC;}{\f72\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020e0705020206020404}Copperplate Gothic Bold;}
{\f73\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020e0507020206020404}Copperplate Gothic Light;}{\f74\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04040404050702020202}Curlz MT;}{\f75\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 030303020407070d0804}Edwardian Script ITC;}
{\f76\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02090707080505020304}Engravers MT;}{\f77\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0805030504020804}Eras Demi ITC;}{\f78\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0402030504020804}Eras Light ITC;}
{\f79\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0504020202050204}Eurostile;}{\f80\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04060505060202020a04}Felix Titling;}{\f81\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0503020102020204}Franklin Gothic Book;}
{\f82\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0703020102020204}Franklin Gothic Demi;}{\f83\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0606030402020204}Franklin Gothic Medium Cond;}{\f84\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03020402040607040605}French Script MT;}
{\f85\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0502020202020204}Century Gothic;}{\f86\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03050502040202030202}Kristen ITC;}{\f87\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0602030504020204}Lucida Sans;}
{\f88\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020e0502030308020204}Maiandra GD;}{\f89\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04040403030d02020704}Matisse ITC;}{\f90\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03070502060502030205}Papyrus;}
{\f91\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020502060401020303}Perpetua;}{\f92\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02060903040505020403}Rockwell Extra Bold;}{\f93\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04020404030d07020202}Tempus Sans ITC;}
{\f94\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03020602050506090804}Vivaldi;}{\f95\froman\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05020102010507070707}Wingdings 2;}{\f96\froman\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05040102010807070707}Wingdings 3;}
{\f97\fswiss\fcharset128\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604020202020204}@Arial Unicode MS;}{\f98\froman\fcharset129\fprq2{\*\panose 02030600000101010101}@Batang;}{\f99\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02040602050305030304}Book Antiqua;}
{\f100\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02050604050505020204}Bookman Old Style;}{\f101\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020404030301010803}Garamond;}{\f102\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0706040902060204}Haettenschweiler;}
{\f103\fmodern\fcharset128\fprq1{\*\panose 02020609040205080304}@MS Mincho;}{\f104\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05000000000000000000}MS Outlook;}{\f105\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03010101010201010101}Monotype Corsiva;}
{\f106\fnil\fcharset134\fprq2{\*\panose 02010600030101010101}@SimSun;}{\f107\froman\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05020603050405020304}Times New Roman Special G2;}{\f108\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0506020202030204}Arial Narrow;}
{\f109\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 050b0604020202020204}Arial Special G2;}{\f110\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 050b0604020202020204}Arial Special G1;}{\f111\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 050b0506020202030204}Arial Narrow Special G1;}
{\f112\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 050b0506020202030204}Arial Narrow Special G2;}{\f113\froman\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05020603050405020304}Times New Roman Special G1;}{\f114\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020503030404060203}Kartika;}
{\f115\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020e0602030304020304}Albertus Medium;}{\f116\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020e0702040304020204}Albertus;}{\f117\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020e0802040304020204}Albertus Extra Bold;}
{\f118\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0602020202020204}ITC Avant Garde Gothic;}{\f119\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0802020202020204}ITC Avant Garde Gothic Demi;}{\f120\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02050604050505020204}ITC Bookman Light;}
{\f121\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02050804040505020204}ITC Bookman Demi;}{\f122\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0502050508020304}CG Omega;}{\f123\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}CG Times;}
{\f124\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03020702040403080804}ITC Zapf Chancery;}{\f125\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02040604040505020204}Clarendon;}{\f126\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02040706040705040204}Clarendon Condensed;}
{\f127\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02040805050505020204}Clarendon Extended;}{\f128\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03030502040406070605}Coronet;}{\f129\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 02070609020205020404}CourierPS;}
{\f130\froman\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05020102010704020609}ITC Zapf Dingbats;}{\f131\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0606020202030204}Helvetica Narrow;}{\f132\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 020b0409020202030204}Letter Gothic;}
{\f133\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03020702040402020504}Marigold;}{\f134\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02040603050705020304}New Century Schoolbook;}{\f135\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0603020204030204}Antique Olive;}
{\f136\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0904030504030204}Antique Olive Compact;}{\f137\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02040502050505030304}Palatino{\*\falt Book Antiqua};}{\f138\froman\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05050102010607020607}SymbolPS;}
{\f139\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0603020202030204}Univers;}{\f140\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0606020202060204}Univers Condensed;}{\f141\froman\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05050102010205020202}MT Extra;}
{\f142\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Helvetica Cyr;}{\f143\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Helvetica Greek;}{\f144\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Helvetica (Hebrew);}
{\f145\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Helvetica (Arabic);}{\f146\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Helvetica (Vietnamese);}
{\f147\froman\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times Cyr{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f148\froman\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times Greek{\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f149\froman\fcharset177\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times (Hebrew){\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f150\froman\fcharset178\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times (Arabic){\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f151\froman\fcharset163\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times (Vietnamese){\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f152\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}???????????????????????????????;}
{\f153\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New (W1){\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f154\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Microsoft Sans Serif (Vietnames;}
{\f155\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Franklin Gothic Medium Cond Gre;}{\f156\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Franklin Gothic Medium Cond Bal;}
{\f157\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}ITC Avant Garde Gothic Demi Bal;}{\f158\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604030504040204}MS Reference Sans Serif;}
{\f159\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05000500000000000000}MS Reference Specialty;}{\f160\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05010101010101010101}Bookshelf Symbol 7;}{\f161\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0504020104020203}Andale Mono IPA;}
{\f162\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02040502050405020303}MS Reference Serif;}{\f163\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604030504040204}Verdana Ref;}{\f164\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02040502050405020303}Georgia Ref;}
{\f165\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05000000000000000000}MS Reference 1;}{\f166\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Reference 2;}{\f167\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 02000500000000000000}RefSpecialty;}
{\f168\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0506030101010103}Abadi MT Condensed;}{\f169\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0a06030101010103}Abadi MT Condensed Extra Bold;}
{\f170\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0306030101010103}Abadi MT Condensed Light;}{\f171\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0503020202020204}Agency FB;}{\f172\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04020705040a02060702}Algerian;}
{\f173\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03080602030302030203}Andy;}{\f174\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020f0704030504030204}Arial Rounded MT Bold;}{\f175\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020602080505020303}Baskerville Old Face;}
{\f176\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04030905020b02020c02}Bauhaus 93;}{\f177\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04040a05050d02020502}Beesknees ITC;}{\f178\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02050806060905020404}Bernard MT Condensed;}
{\f179\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 030202020406070a0903}Bickley Script;}{\f180\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04030b070d0b02020403}Braggadocio;}{\f181\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0903060703020204}Britannic Bold;}
{\f182\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04040905080b02020502}Broadway;}{\f183\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03060802040406070304}Brush Script MT;}{\f184\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02040603050505030304}Calisto MT;}
{\f185\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020a0402060406010301}Castellar;}{\f186\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04020404031007020602}Chiller;}{\f187\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 0208090404030b020404}Cooper Black;}
{\f188\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04020505060803040902}Edda;}{\f189\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020904090505020303}Elephant;}{\f190\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04030405020f02020502}Enviro;}
{\f191\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03060602040506080206}Fine Hand;}{\f192\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 030804020302050b0404}Freestyle Script;}{\f193\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04040504061007020d02}Gigi;}
{\f194\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0502020104020203}Gill Sans MT;}{\f195\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0506020104020203}Gill Sans MT Condensed;}{\f196\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0a02020104020203}Gill Sans Ultra Bold;}
{\f197\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020502050305020303}Goudy Old Style;}{\f198\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 0202090407030b020401}Goudy Stout;}{\f199\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04030604020f02020d02}Harlow Solid Italic;}
{\f200\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04040505050a02020702}Harrington;}{\f201\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04020605060303030202}Imprint MT Shadow;}{\f202\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 030604020304060b0204}Informal Roman;}
{\f203\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04090605060d06020702}Jokerman;}{\f204\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04040403040a02020202}Juice ITC;}{\f205\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 040307050d0c02020703}Kino MT;}
{\f206\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 030304020206070d0d06}Kunstler Script;}{\f207\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020a0a07050505020404}Wide Latin;}{\f208\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03010101010101010101}Lucida Calligraphy;}
{\f209\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03010101010101010101}Lucida Handwriting;}{\f210\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03020802060602070202}Matura MT Script Capitals;}{\f211\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02070704070505020303}Modern No. 20;}
{\f212\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 020b0609020202020204}OCRB;}{\f213\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03040902040508030806}Old English Text MT;}{\f214\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04050602080702020203}Onyx;}
{\f215\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 030303020206070c0b05}Palace Script MT;}{\f216\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03080702040402020b04}Parade;}{\f217\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03040602040708040804}Parchment;}
{\f218\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03060402040502070804}Pepita MT;}{\f219\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020502060505020804}Perpetua Titling MT;}{\f220\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0606030402050204}Placard Condensed;}
{\f221\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 040506030a0602020202}Playbill;}{\f222\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02080502050505020702}Poor Richard;}{\f223\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03060402040406080204}Pristina;}
{\f224\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03070502040507070304}Rage Italic;}{\f225\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02060603020205020403}Rockwell;}{\f226\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020a0606050403050204}Runic MT Condensed;}
{\f227\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03040602040607080904}Script MT Bold;}{\f228\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04040a07060a02020202}Snap ITC;}{\f229\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03070502030502020203}Viner Hand ITC;}
{\f230\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03050402040407070305}Vladimir Script;}{\f231\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}normal verdana;}{\f232\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}IAGB5 Symbol;}
{\f233\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0706030402020204}Franklin Gothic Demi Cond;}{\f234\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0903020102020204}Franklin Gothic Heavy;}{\f235\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02010509020102010303}OCR A Extended;}
{\f236\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03020802040602020201}American Uncial;}{\f237\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04060505051002080904}Augsburger Initials;}{\f238\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04020505020e03040504}Desdemona;}
{\f239\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03060902040502070203}Forte;}{\f240\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03080302020302020206}Gradl;}{\f241\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 01010101010101010101}Mercurius Script MT Bold;}
{\f242\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 01010601010101010101}Monotype Sorts;}{\f243\froman\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05020102010208020808}Monotype Sorts 2;}{\f244\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 040c0101020201010102}Ransom;}
{\f245\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 040409050d0802020404}Stencil;}{\f246\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04030805020b02020404}Stop;}{\f247\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020503060305020303}Bell MT;}
{\f248\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 0207040306080b030204}Californian FB;}{\f249\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 0204060206030a020304}Footlight MT Light;}{\f250\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02040502050506030303}High Tower Text;}
{\f251\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04040805050809020602}Ravie;}{\f252\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04020904020102020604}Showcard Gothic;}{\f253\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 050b0604020202020204}Bookshelf Symbol 1;}
{\f254\froman\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05050102010706020507}Bookshelf Symbol 3;}{\f255\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 050b0604020202020204}Bookshelf Symbol 4;}{\f256\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05010101010101010101}Bookshelf Symbol 5;}
{\f257\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Franklin Gothic Demi Cond CE;}{\f258\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Franklin Gothic Demi Cond Cyr;}
{\f259\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Franklin Gothic Demi Cond Greek;}{\f260\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Franklin Gothic Demi Cond Tur;}
{\f261\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Franklin Gothic Demi Cond Balti;}{\f262\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Franklin Gothic Heavy CE;}
{\f263\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Franklin Gothic Heavy Cyr;}{\f264\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Franklin Gothic Heavy Greek;}
{\f265\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Franklin Gothic Heavy Tur;}{\f266\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Franklin Gothic Heavy Baltic;}
{\f267\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Reference Sans Serif (Vietna;}{\f268\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}BR-01T;}{\f269\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}BR-05B;}
{\f270\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Brougham;}{\f271\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}BR-11U;}{\f272\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Albertville;}
{\f273\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Albertville Extrabold;}{\f274\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Antique Oakland;}{\f275\froman\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}BR Symbol;}
{\f276\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}PC Brussels Demi;}{\f277\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}PC Brussels Light;}{\f278\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Cleveland Condensed;}
{\f279\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Conneticut;}{\f280\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Guatemala Antique;}{\f281\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Helsinki;}
{\f282\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Maryland;}{\f283\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Oklahoma;}{\f284\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}PC Tennessee Roman;}
{\f285\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Tennessee Roman;}{\f286\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Utah;}{\f287\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Utah Condensed;}
{\f288\fdecor\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}W Dingbats;}{\f289\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier (W1);}{\f290\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02000702030000020004}Twentieth Century Poster1;}
{\f291\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04010502060101010303}Creepy;}{\f292\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020c0804040000000001}EraserDust;}{\f293\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 01010101010101010101}Figaro MT;}
{\f294\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 01010101010101010101}KidTYPEPaint;}{\f295\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03010101010101010101}Mistral AV;}{\f296\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0904020202020204}Plump MT;}
{\f297\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02000509000000000005}Space Toaster;}{\f298\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02000800000000000004}Team MT;}{\f299\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0504020203020204}News Gothic MT;}
{\f300\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04040506030f02020702}Westminster;}{\f301\fmodern\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0809000000000003}Arial Alternative;}{\f302\fmodern\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0809000000000003}Arial Alternative Symbol;}
{\f303\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0606020104020203}Tw Cen MT Condensed;}{\f304\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0803020000000004}Tw Cen MT Condensed Extra Bold;}{\f305\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 020b0509000000000004}Andale Mono;}
{\f306\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Uncial ATT;}{\f307\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Tw Cen MT Condensed Extra Bold ;}{\f308\fnil\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Uncial ATT CE;}
{\f309\fnil\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Uncial ATT Tur;}{\f310\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial (W1){\*\falt Arial};}{\f311\fnil\fcharset255\fprq3{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Roman;}
{\f312\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial (W1) CE;}{\f313\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial (W1) Cyr;}{\f314\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial (W1) Greek;}
{\f315\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial (W1) Tur;}{\f316\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial (W1) (Hebrew);}{\f317\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial (W1) (Arabic);}
{\f318\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial (W1) Baltic;}{\f319\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial (W1) (Vietnamese);}
{\f320\froman\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New (W1) CE{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f321\froman\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New (W1) Cyr{\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f322\froman\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New (W1) Greek{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f323\froman\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New (W1) Tur{\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f324\froman\fcharset177\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New (W1) (Hebrew){\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f325\froman\fcharset178\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New (W1) (Arabic){\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f326\froman\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New (W1) Baltic{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f327\froman\fcharset163\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New (W1) (Vietnamese){\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f328\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0402020202020204}AvantGarde Bk BT;}{\f329\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04030205020b02020502}BernhardFashion BT;}{\f330\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}Boink LET;}
{\f331\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02050604050505020204}BookmanITC Lt BT;}{\f332\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03060802040406070304}BrushScript BT;}{\f333\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0904040702060204}Compacta Blk BT;}
{\f334\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0508030702060204}Compacta Lt BT;}{\f335\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 0208060305030b020404}Cooper Md BT;}{\f336\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020e0605020203020404}CopprplGoth BT;}
{\f337\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 0204050203030b020204}Dauphin;}{\f338\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03060902030202020203}DomBold BT;}{\f339\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03060902030302020204}DomCasual BT;}
{\f340\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 030306020406070f0b05}English111 Presto BT;}{\f341\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03030702030607090b03}English111 Vivace BT;}{\f342\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04040805071002020d02}FlamencoD;}
{\f343\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0806020204020204}Futura XBlkCn BT;}{\f344\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0602020204020303}Futura Md BT;}{\f345\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0506020204030204}Humanst521 Cn BT;}
{\f346\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03050502040202020203}Kids;}{\f347\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020602070506020304}NewBskvll BT;}{\f348\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03030602040405080b03}Nuptial BT;}
{\f349\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Scruff LET;}{\f350\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03050502040202020b03}Technical;}{\f351\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020f0702020204020204}VAGRounded BT;}
{\f352\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03010101010101010101}VivaldiD;}{\f353\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05000000000000000000}Animals 1;}{\f354\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05000000000000000000}Animals 2;}
{\f355\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0603050302020204}Arrows2;}{\f356\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0603050302020204}Balloons;}{\f357\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0603050302020204}Buildings;}
{\f358\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0603050302020204}CommonBullets;}{\f359\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0603050302020204}Computers;}{\f360\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}DF Calligraphic Ornaments LET;}
{\f361\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}DF Diversions LET;}{\f362\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}DF Diversities LET;}{\f363\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0603050302020204}Festive;}
{\f364\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0603050302020204}Food;}{\f365\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0603050302020204}Household;}{\f366\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0603050302020204}Hygiene;}
{\f367\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05000000000000000000}Kidnap;}{\f368\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05000000000000000000}Music;}{\f369\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0603050302020204}Plants;}
{\f370\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0603050302020204}SportsFigures;}{\f371\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0603050302020204}Transportation;}{\f372\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0603050302020204}Weather;}
{\f373\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02040603050705020303}CentSchbook BT;}{\f374\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03080402030202060204}Van Dijk;}{\f375\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 040b0500000000000000}Lithograph;}
{\f376\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 01010101010101010101}Adolescence;}{\f377\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0803020204040204}AntigoniBd;}{\f378\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0406020204020204}Antigoni Light;}
{\f379\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0703020204030204}Antigoni Med;}{\f380\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0603020204030204}Antigoni;}{\f381\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020e0806020206070204}MGI Archon;}
{\f382\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020d0802060808030204}AucoinExtBol;}{\f383\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020d0602050304030204}AucoinLight;}{\f384\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0804040403020303}Banjoman Open Bold;}
{\f385\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020e0803080505070304}Bedini;}{\f386\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02000503000000000004}Bermuda Solid;}{\f387\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0900020202060204}Eurostar Black Extended;}
{\f388\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0504020202050204}Eurostar;}{\f389\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0507020202060204}Eurostar Regular Extended;}{\f390\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02000507000000000004}Falstaff Festival MT;}
{\f391\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020e0602060706020304}Gourmand;}{\f392\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0704030103070804}Metro Nouveau;}{\f393\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02000504000000000003}Orbus Multiserif;}
{\f394\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02000306050000000002}Palace Script MT Semi Bold;}{\f395\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02090502050106070304}Palladius;}{\f396\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020e0702050806020304}Peinaud;}
{\f397\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020e0302020206020904}Schindler;}{\f398\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020e0402020206020904}Schindler Small Caps;}{\f399\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03010101010101010101}Wendy Medium;}
{\f400\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03020602050506090804}Vianta;}{\f401\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04040604020b02020304}LcdD;}{\f402\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020502060200020303}GiovanniITCTT;}
{\f403\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00050102010706020507}Map Symbols;}{\f404\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Eurostar Regular Extended Balti;}{\f405\fdecor\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Creepy CE;}
{\f406\fdecor\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Creepy Tur;}{\f407\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}EraserDust CE;}{\f408\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}EraserDust Tur;}
{\f409\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Tw Cen MT Condensed CE;}{\f410\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Andale Mono CE;}{\f411\fmodern\fcharset204\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Andale Mono Cyr;}
{\f412\fmodern\fcharset161\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Andale Mono Greek;}{\f413\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Andale Mono Tur;}{\f414\fmodern\fcharset186\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Andale Mono Baltic;}
{\f415\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}AvantGarde Bk BT CE;}{\f416\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}AvantGarde Bk BT Greek;}
{\f417\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}AvantGarde Bk BT Tur;}{\f418\fdecor\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}BernhardFashion BT CE;}
{\f419\fdecor\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}BernhardFashion BT Greek;}{\f420\fdecor\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}BernhardFashion BT Tur;}{\f421\fnil\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Boink LET Greek;}
{\f422\froman\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}BookmanITC Lt BT CE;}{\f423\froman\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}BookmanITC Lt BT Greek;}
{\f424\froman\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}BookmanITC Lt BT Tur;}{\f425\fscript\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}BrushScript BT CE;}{\f426\fscript\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}BrushScript BT Greek;}
{\f427\fscript\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}BrushScript BT Tur;}{\f428\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Compacta Blk BT CE;}{\f429\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Compacta Blk BT Greek;}
{\f430\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Compacta Blk BT Tur;}{\f431\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Compacta Lt BT CE;}{\f432\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Compacta Lt BT Greek;}
{\f433\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Compacta Lt BT Tur;}{\f434\froman\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Cooper Md BT CE;}{\f435\froman\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Cooper Md BT Greek;}
{\f436\froman\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Cooper Md BT Tur;}{\f437\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}CopprplGoth BT CE;}{\f438\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}CopprplGoth BT Greek;}
{\f439\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}CopprplGoth BT Tur;}{\f440\fscript\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}DomBold BT CE;}{\f441\fscript\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}DomBold BT Greek;}
{\f442\fscript\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}DomBold BT Tur;}{\f443\fscript\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}DomCasual BT CE;}{\f444\fscript\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}DomCasual BT Greek;}
{\f445\fscript\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}DomCasual BT Tur;}{\f446\fscript\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}English111 Presto BT CE;}
{\f447\fscript\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}English111 Presto BT Greek;}{\f448\fscript\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}English111 Presto BT Tur;}
{\f449\fscript\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}English111 Vivace BT CE;}{\f450\fscript\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}English111 Vivace BT Greek;}
{\f451\fscript\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}English111 Vivace BT Tur;}{\f452\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Futura XBlkCn BT CE;}
{\f453\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Futura XBlkCn BT Greek;}{\f454\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Futura XBlkCn BT Tur;}{\f455\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Futura Md BT CE;}
{\f456\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Futura Md BT Greek;}{\f457\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Futura Md BT Tur;}{\f458\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Humanst521 Cn BT CE;}
{\f459\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Humanst521 Cn BT Greek;}{\f460\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Humanst521 Cn BT Tur;}{\f461\froman\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}NewBskvll BT CE;}
{\f462\froman\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}NewBskvll BT Greek;}{\f463\froman\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}NewBskvll BT Tur;}{\f464\fscript\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Nuptial BT CE;}
{\f465\fscript\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Nuptial BT Greek;}{\f466\fscript\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Nuptial BT Tur;}{\f467\fnil\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Scruff LET Greek;}
{\f468\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}VAGRounded BT CE;}{\f469\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}VAGRounded BT Greek;}{\f470\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}VAGRounded BT Tur;}
{\f471\fscript\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}VivaldiD CE;}{\f472\fscript\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}VivaldiD Tur;}{\f473\froman\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}CentSchbook BT CE;}
{\f474\froman\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}CentSchbook BT Greek;}{\f475\froman\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}CentSchbook BT Tur;}{\f476\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}AntigoniBd CE;}
{\f477\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}AntigoniBd Greek;}{\f478\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}AntigoniBd Tur;}{\f479\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}AntigoniBd Baltic;}
{\f480\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Antigoni Light CE;}{\f481\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Antigoni Light Greek;}{\f482\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Antigoni Light Tur;}
{\f483\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Antigoni Light Baltic;}{\f484\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Antigoni Med CE;}{\f485\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Antigoni Med Greek;}
{\f486\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Antigoni Med Tur;}{\f487\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Antigoni Med Baltic;}{\f488\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Antigoni CE;}
{\f489\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Antigoni Greek;}{\f490\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Antigoni Tur;}{\f491\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Antigoni Baltic;}
{\f492\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MGI Archon CE;}{\f493\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MGI Archon Greek;}{\f494\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MGI Archon Tur;}
{\f495\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MGI Archon Baltic;}{\f496\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}AucoinExtBol CE;}{\f497\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}AucoinExtBol Greek;}
{\f498\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}AucoinExtBol Tur;}{\f499\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}AucoinExtBol Baltic;}{\f500\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}AucoinLight CE;}
{\f501\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}AucoinLight Greek;}{\f502\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}AucoinLight Tur;}{\f503\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}AucoinLight Baltic;}
{\f504\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Bedini CE;}{\f505\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Bedini Greek;}{\f506\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Bedini Tur;}
{\f507\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Bedini Baltic;}{\f508\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Eurostar Black Extended CE;}
{\f509\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Eurostar Black Extended Greek;}{\f510\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Eurostar Black Extended Tur;}
{\f511\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Eurostar Black Extended Baltic;}{\f512\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Eurostar CE;}{\f513\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Eurostar Greek;}
{\f514\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Eurostar Tur;}{\f515\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Eurostar Baltic;}{\f516\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Eurostar Regular Extended CE;}
{\f517\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Eurostar Regular Extended Greek;}{\f518\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Eurostar Regular Extended Tur;}
{\f519\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Gourmand CE;}{\f520\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Gourmand Greek;}{\f521\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Gourmand Tur;}
{\f522\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Gourmand Baltic;}{\f523\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Metro Nouveau CE;}{\f524\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Metro Nouveau Greek;}
{\f525\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Metro Nouveau Tur;}{\f526\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Metro Nouveau Baltic;}{\f527\froman\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Palladius CE;}
{\f528\froman\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Palladius Greek;}{\f529\froman\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Palladius Tur;}{\f530\froman\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Palladius Baltic;}
{\f531\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Peinaud CE;}{\f532\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Peinaud Greek;}{\f533\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Peinaud Tur;}
{\f534\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Peinaud Baltic;}{\f535\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Schindler CE;}{\f536\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Schindler Greek;}
{\f537\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Schindler Tur;}{\f538\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Schindler Baltic;}{\f539\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Schindler Small Caps CE;}
{\f540\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Schindler Small Caps Greek;}{\f541\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Schindler Small Caps Tur;}
{\f542\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Schindler Small Caps Baltic;}{\f543\fscript\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Vianta Greek;}{\f544\fdecor\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}LcdD CE;}
{\f545\fdecor\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}LcdD Tur;}{\f546\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}????????????????????????\'a8\'ac?????;}
{\f547\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}??????????????????????\'a8\'ac???????;}{\f548\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}?????????????????????????\'a1\'ec????;}
{\f549\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}??????????????????????????????\'a8;}{\f550\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman CYR;}
{\f551\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman TUR;}{\f552\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial CYR;}{\f553\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial TUR;}
{\f554\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New CYR;}{\f555\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New TUR;}{\f556\fnil\fcharset178\fprq2{\*\panose 02010000000000000000}Traditional Arabic;}
{\f557\fnil\fcharset178\fprq2{\*\panose 02010000000000000000}Arabic Transparent;}{\f558\fnil\fcharset178\fprq2{\*\panose 02010000000000000000}Andalus;}{\f559\fnil\fcharset178\fprq2{\*\panose 02010000000000000000}Simplified Arabic;}
{\f560\fmodern\fcharset178\fprq1{\*\panose 02010009000000000000}Simplified Arabic Fixed;}{\f561\fmodern\fcharset134\fprq1{\*\panose 02010609030101010101}NSimSun;}{\f562\fmodern\fcharset134\fprq1{\*\panose 02010609030101010101}@NSimSun;}
{\f563\fnil\fcharset134\fprq2{\*\panose 02010600030101010101}@SimHei;}{\f564\froman\fcharset128\fprq2{\*\panose 02020600040205080304}MS PMincho;}{\f565\froman\fcharset128\fprq2{\*\panose 02020600040205080304}@MS PMincho;}
{\f566\fmodern\fcharset128\fprq1{\*\panose 020b0609070205080204}@MS Gothic;}{\f567\fswiss\fcharset128\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0600070205080204}MS PGothic;}{\f568\fswiss\fcharset128\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0600070205080204}@MS PGothic;}
{\f569\fswiss\fcharset128\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0600070205080204}MS UI Gothic;}{\f570\fswiss\fcharset128\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0600070205080204}@MS UI Gothic;}{\f571\froman\fcharset222\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}AngsanaUPC;}
{\f572\fswiss\fcharset222\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604020202020204}BrowalliaUPC;}{\f573\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604020202020204}Browallia New;}{\f574\fswiss\fcharset222\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0304020202020204}CordiaUPC;}
{\f575\froman\fcharset222\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}DilleniaUPC;}{\f576\froman\fcharset222\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}EucrosiaUPC;}{\f577\fswiss\fcharset222\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604020202020204}FreesiaUPC;}
{\f578\fswiss\fcharset222\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604020202020204}IrisUPC;}{\f579\froman\fcharset222\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}JasmineUPC;}{\f580\froman\fcharset222\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}KodchiangUPC;}
{\f581\fswiss\fcharset222\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604020202020204}LilyUPC;}{\f582\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 050b0604020202020204}Typographic Ext;}{\f583\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05000000000000000000}Iconic Symbols Ext;}
{\f584\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05000000000000000000}Math Ext;}{\f585\froman\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05020603050405020304}Multinational Ext;}{\f586\froman\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05020603050405020304}Greek Symbols;}
{\f587\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}SPSS Marker Set;}{\f588\froman\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05050102010607020607}MapInfo Cartographic;}{\f589\fmodern\fcharset136\fprq1{\*\panose 02020309000000000000}@MingLiU;}
{\f590\froman\fcharset136\fprq2{\*\panose 02020300000000000000}@PMingLiU;}{\f591\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}(Use Asian text font){\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f592\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}PMingLiU Western{\*\falt !Ps2OcuAe};}{\f593\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Gothic Western{\*\falt ?l?r ?S?V?b?N};}
{\f594\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Gothic CE{\*\falt ?l?r ?S?V?b?N};}{\f595\fmodern\fcharset204\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Gothic Cyr{\*\falt ?l?r ?S?V?b?N};}
{\f596\fmodern\fcharset161\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Gothic Greek{\*\falt ?l?r ?S?V?b?N};}{\f597\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Gothic Tur{\*\falt ?l?r ?S?V?b?N};}
{\f598\fmodern\fcharset186\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Gothic Baltic{\*\falt ?l?r ?S?V?b?N};}{\f599\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MingLiU Western{\*\falt 2OcuAe};}
{\f600\froman\fcharset163\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman CYR (Vietnamese;}{\f601\froman\fcharset163\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman Greek (Vietname;}
{\f602\froman\fcharset163\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman TUR (Vietnamese;}{\f603\froman\fcharset163\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman Baltic (Vietnam;}
{\f604\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}NSimSun Western;}{\f605\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@NSimSun Western;}{\f606\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS PMincho Western;}
{\f607\froman\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS PMincho CE;}{\f608\froman\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS PMincho Cyr;}{\f609\froman\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS PMincho Greek;}
{\f610\froman\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS PMincho Tur;}{\f611\froman\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS PMincho Baltic;}{\f612\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS PMincho Western;}
{\f613\froman\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS PMincho CE;}{\f614\froman\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS PMincho Cyr;}{\f615\froman\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS PMincho Greek;}
{\f616\froman\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS PMincho Tur;}{\f617\froman\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS PMincho Baltic;}{\f618\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS Gothic Western;}
{\f619\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS Gothic CE;}{\f620\fmodern\fcharset204\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS Gothic Cyr;}{\f621\fmodern\fcharset161\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS Gothic Greek;}
{\f622\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS Gothic Tur;}{\f623\fmodern\fcharset186\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS Gothic Baltic;}{\f624\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS PGothic Western;}
{\f625\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS PGothic CE;}{\f626\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS PGothic Cyr;}{\f627\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS PGothic Greek;}
{\f628\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS PGothic Tur;}{\f629\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS PGothic Baltic;}{\f630\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS PGothic Western;}
{\f631\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS PGothic CE;}{\f632\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS PGothic Cyr;}{\f633\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS PGothic Greek;}
{\f634\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS PGothic Tur;}{\f635\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS PGothic Baltic;}{\f636\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS UI Gothic Western;}
{\f637\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS UI Gothic CE;}{\f638\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS UI Gothic Cyr;}{\f639\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS UI Gothic Greek;}
{\f640\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS UI Gothic Tur;}{\f641\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS UI Gothic Baltic;}{\f642\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS UI Gothic Western;}
{\f643\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS UI Gothic CE;}{\f644\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS UI Gothic Cyr;}{\f645\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS UI Gothic Greek;}
{\f646\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS UI Gothic Tur;}{\f647\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS UI Gothic Baltic;}{\f648\fswiss\fcharset222\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Browallia New (Thai);}
{\f649\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MingLiU Western;}{\f650\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@PMingLiU Western;}
{\f651\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}????????????????????\'a1\'a7?????????;}{\f652\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Sans Serif{\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f653\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0502040204020203}Segoe Media Center;}{\f654\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0702040200020203}Segoe Media Center Semibold;}{\f655\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0804030504040204}Tahoma Small Cap;}
{\f656\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Elite{\*\falt Arial};}{\f657\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}GothicPS{\*\falt Arial};}
{\f658\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}????????????\'a1\'a7???????;}{\f659\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}??????????????????\'a8\'ac?????????;}
{\f660\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}????????????????????????\'a1\'a7?????;}{\f661\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}??????????????????????\'a1\'a7???????;}
{\f662\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}CG Times (W1){\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f663\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}CG Times 12pt;}
{\f664\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}????????????????????\'a8\'ac?????????;}{\f665\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}?????\'a1\'ec???;}
{\f666\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}????\'a1\'a7???;}{\f667\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Prestige;}{\f668\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}?????????????????\'a1\'ec?????????;}
{\f669\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}??????????????????\'a1\'a7??????????;}{\f670\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}o{\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f671\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}ome{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f672\fnil\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times Roman{\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f673\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Plain text{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f674\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}boscombe{\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f675\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}??????????????????????????\'a8\'ac???;}{\f676\froman\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Rockwell CE;}
{\f677\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Reference Sans Serif CE;}{\f678\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Reference Sans Serif Cyr;}
{\f679\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Reference Sans Serif Greek;}{\f680\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Reference Sans Serif Tur;}
{\f681\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Reference Sans Serif Baltic;}{\f682\froman\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Reference Serif CE;}
{\f683\froman\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Reference Serif Cyr;}{\f684\froman\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Reference Serif Greek;}
{\f685\froman\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Reference Serif Tur;}{\f686\froman\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Reference Serif Baltic;}
{\f687\froman\fcharset163\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Reference Serif (Vietnamese);}{\f688\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Verdana Ref CE;}{\f689\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Verdana Ref Cyr;}
{\f690\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Verdana Ref Greek;}{\f691\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Verdana Ref Tur;}{\f692\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Verdana Ref Baltic;}
{\f693\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Verdana Ref (Vietnamese);}{\f694\froman\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Georgia Ref CE;}{\f695\froman\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Georgia Ref Cyr;}
{\f696\froman\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Georgia Ref Greek;}{\f697\froman\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Georgia Ref Tur;}{\f698\froman\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Georgia Ref Baltic;}
{\f699\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Gill Sans MT CE;}{\f700\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Gill Sans MT Condensed CE;}
{\f701\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Gill Sans Ultra Bold CE;}{\f702\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}Sydnie;}{\f703\fnil\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Sydnie Greek;}
{\f704\froman\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman CYR CE;}{\f705\froman\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman CYR Cyr;}
{\f706\froman\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman CYR Greek;}{\f707\froman\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman CYR Tur;}
{\f708\froman\fcharset177\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman CYR (Hebrew);}{\f709\froman\fcharset178\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman CYR (Arabic);}
{\f710\froman\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman CYR Baltic;}{\f711\froman\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman TUR CE;}
{\f712\froman\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman TUR Cyr;}{\f713\froman\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman TUR Greek;}
{\f714\froman\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman TUR Tur;}{\f715\froman\fcharset177\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman TUR (Hebrew);}
{\f716\froman\fcharset178\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman TUR (Arabic);}{\f717\froman\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman TUR Baltic;}
{\f718\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial CYR CE;}{\f719\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial CYR Cyr;}{\f720\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial CYR Greek;}
{\f721\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial CYR Tur;}{\f722\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial CYR (Hebrew);}{\f723\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial CYR (Arabic);}
{\f724\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial CYR Baltic;}{\f725\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial CYR (Vietnamese);}{\f726\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial TUR CE;}
{\f727\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial TUR Cyr;}{\f728\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial TUR Greek;}{\f729\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial TUR Tur;}
{\f730\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial TUR (Hebrew);}{\f731\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial TUR (Arabic);}{\f732\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial TUR Baltic;}
{\f733\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial TUR (Vietnamese);}{\f734\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New CYR CE;}
{\f735\fmodern\fcharset204\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New CYR Cyr;}{\f736\fmodern\fcharset161\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New CYR Greek;}
{\f737\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New CYR Tur;}{\f738\fmodern\fcharset177\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New CYR (Hebrew);}
{\f739\fmodern\fcharset178\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New CYR (Arabic);}{\f740\fmodern\fcharset186\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New CYR Baltic;}
{\f741\fmodern\fcharset163\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New CYR (Vietnamese);}{\f742\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New TUR CE;}
{\f743\fmodern\fcharset204\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New TUR Cyr;}{\f744\fmodern\fcharset161\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New TUR Greek;}
{\f745\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New TUR Tur;}{\f746\fmodern\fcharset177\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New TUR (Hebrew);}
{\f747\fmodern\fcharset178\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New TUR (Arabic);}{\f748\fmodern\fcharset186\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New TUR Baltic;}
{\f749\fmodern\fcharset163\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New TUR (Vietnamese);}{\f750\froman\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman Greek CE;}
{\f751\froman\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman Greek Cyr;}{\f752\froman\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman Greek Greek;}
{\f753\froman\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman Greek Tur;}{\f754\froman\fcharset177\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman Greek (Hebrew);}
{\f755\froman\fcharset178\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman Greek (Arabic);}{\f756\froman\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman Greek Baltic;}
{\f757\froman\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman Baltic CE;}{\f758\froman\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman Baltic Cyr;}
{\f759\froman\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman Baltic Greek;}{\f760\froman\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman Baltic Tur;}
{\f761\froman\fcharset177\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman Baltic (Hebrew);}{\f762\froman\fcharset178\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman Baltic (Arabic);}
{\f763\froman\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman Baltic Baltic;}{\f764\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial Baltic CE;}{\f765\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial Baltic Cyr;}
{\f766\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial Baltic Greek;}{\f767\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial Baltic Tur;}{\f768\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial Baltic (Hebrew);}
{\f769\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial Baltic (Arabic);}{\f770\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial Baltic Baltic;}
{\f771\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial Baltic (Vietnamese);}{\f772\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New Baltic CE;}
{\f773\fmodern\fcharset204\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New Baltic Cyr;}{\f774\fmodern\fcharset161\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New Baltic Greek;}
{\f775\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New Baltic Tur;}{\f776\fmodern\fcharset177\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New Baltic (Hebrew);}
{\f777\fmodern\fcharset178\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New Baltic (Arabic);}{\f778\fmodern\fcharset186\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New Baltic Baltic;}
{\f779\fmodern\fcharset163\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New Baltic (Vietnamese);}{\f780\froman\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman CE CE;}
{\f781\froman\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman CE Cyr;}{\f782\froman\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman CE Greek;}
{\f783\froman\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman CE Tur;}{\f784\froman\fcharset177\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman CE (Hebrew);}
{\f785\froman\fcharset178\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman CE (Arabic);}{\f786\froman\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman CE Baltic;}
{\f787\froman\fcharset163\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman CE (Vietnamese);}{\f788\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial CE CE;}{\f789\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial CE Cyr;}
{\f790\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial CE Greek;}{\f791\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial CE Tur;}{\f792\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial CE (Hebrew);}
{\f793\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial CE (Arabic);}{\f794\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial CE Baltic;}{\f795\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial CE (Vietnamese);}
{\f796\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial Greek CE;}{\f797\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial Greek Cyr;}{\f798\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial Greek Greek;}
{\f799\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial Greek Tur;}{\f800\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial Greek (Hebrew);}{\f801\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial Greek (Arabic);}
{\f802\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial Greek Baltic;}{\f803\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial Greek (Vietnamese);}{\f804\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New CE CE;}
{\f805\fmodern\fcharset204\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New CE Cyr;}{\f806\fmodern\fcharset161\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New CE Greek;}{\f807\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New CE Tur;}
{\f808\fmodern\fcharset177\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New CE (Hebrew);}{\f809\fmodern\fcharset178\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New CE (Arabic);}
{\f810\fmodern\fcharset186\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New CE Baltic;}{\f811\fmodern\fcharset163\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New CE (Vietnamese);}
{\f812\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New Greek CE;}{\f813\fmodern\fcharset204\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New Greek Cyr;}
{\f814\fmodern\fcharset161\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New Greek Greek;}{\f815\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New Greek Tur;}
{\f816\fmodern\fcharset177\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New Greek (Hebrew);}{\f817\fmodern\fcharset178\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New Greek (Arabic);}
{\f818\fmodern\fcharset186\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New Greek Baltic;}{\f819\fmodern\fcharset163\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier New Greek (Vietnamese);}
{\f820\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f821\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f823\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek{\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f824\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f825\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew){\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f826\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic){\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f827\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f828\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese){\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f830\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Arial CE;}{\f831\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Arial Cyr;}
{\f833\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Arial Greek;}{\f834\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Arial Tur;}{\f835\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2 Arial (Hebrew);}{\f836\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2 Arial (Arabic);}{\f837\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Arial Baltic;}
{\f838\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2 Arial (Vietnamese);}{\f840\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1 Courier New CE;}{\f841\fmodern\fcharset204\fprq1 Courier New Cyr;}{\f843\fmodern\fcharset161\fprq1 Courier New Greek;}{\f844\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1 Courier New Tur;}
{\f845\fmodern\fcharset177\fprq1 Courier New (Hebrew);}{\f846\fmodern\fcharset178\fprq1 Courier New (Arabic);}{\f847\fmodern\fcharset186\fprq1 Courier New Baltic;}{\f848\fmodern\fcharset163\fprq1 Courier New (Vietnamese);}
{\f860\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Helvetica CE;}{\f864\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Helvetica Tur;}{\f867\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Helvetica Baltic;}{\f932\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1 MS Mincho Western{\*\falt ?l?r ??\'81\'66c};}
{\f930\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1 MS Mincho CE{\*\falt ?l?r ??\'81\'66c};}{\f931\fmodern\fcharset204\fprq1 MS Mincho Cyr{\*\falt ?l?r ??\'81\'66c};}{\f933\fmodern\fcharset161\fprq1 MS Mincho Greek{\*\falt ?l?r ??\'81\'66c};}
{\f934\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1 MS Mincho Tur{\*\falt ?l?r ??\'81\'66c};}{\f937\fmodern\fcharset186\fprq1 MS Mincho Baltic{\*\falt ?l?r ??\'81\'66c};}
{\f942\froman\fcharset0\fprq2 Batang Western{\*\falt \'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7E\'a2\'aeEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7EcEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE};}
{\f940\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Batang CE{\*\falt \'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7E\'a2\'aeEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7EcEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE};}
{\f941\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Batang Cyr{\*\falt \'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7E\'a2\'aeEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7EcEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE};}
{\f943\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Batang Greek{\*\falt \'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7E\'a2\'aeEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7EcEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE};}
{\f944\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Batang Tur{\*\falt \'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7E\'a2\'aeEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7EcEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE};}
{\f947\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Batang Baltic{\*\falt \'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7E\'a2\'aeEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7EcEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE};}{\f952\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2 SimSun Western{\*\falt ??????????\'a8\'ac?????};}
{\f1030\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Century CE;}{\f1031\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Century Cyr;}{\f1033\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Century Greek;}{\f1034\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Century Tur;}{\f1037\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Century Baltic;}
{\f1042\froman\fcharset0\fprq2 Angsana New;}{\f1052\froman\fcharset0\fprq2 Cordia New;}{\f1080\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Sylfaen CE;}{\f1081\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Sylfaen Cyr;}{\f1083\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Sylfaen Greek;}
{\f1084\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Sylfaen Tur;}{\f1087\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Sylfaen Baltic;}{\f1162\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2 Arial Unicode MS Western;}{\f1160\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Arial Unicode MS CE;}
{\f1161\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Arial Unicode MS Cyr;}{\f1163\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Arial Unicode MS Greek;}{\f1164\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Arial Unicode MS Tur;}{\f1165\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2 Arial Unicode MS (Hebrew);}
{\f1166\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2 Arial Unicode MS (Arabic);}{\f1167\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Arial Unicode MS Baltic;}{\f1168\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2 Arial Unicode MS (Vietnamese);}{\f1169\fswiss\fcharset222\fprq2 Arial Unicode MS (Thai);}
{\f1170\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Tahoma CE;}{\f1171\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Tahoma Cyr;}{\f1173\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Tahoma Greek;}{\f1174\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Tahoma Tur;}{\f1175\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2 Tahoma (Hebrew);}
{\f1176\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2 Tahoma (Arabic);}{\f1177\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Tahoma Baltic;}{\f1178\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2 Tahoma (Vietnamese);}{\f1179\fswiss\fcharset222\fprq2 Tahoma (Thai);}
{\f1190\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times CE{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f1194\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times Tur{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f1197\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times Baltic{\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f1210\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1 Lucida Console CE;}{\f1211\fmodern\fcharset204\fprq1 Lucida Console Cyr;}{\f1213\fmodern\fcharset161\fprq1 Lucida Console Greek;}{\f1214\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1 Lucida Console Tur;}
{\f1220\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Verdana CE;}{\f1221\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Verdana Cyr;}{\f1223\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Verdana Greek;}{\f1224\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Verdana Tur;}{\f1227\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Verdana Baltic;}
{\f1228\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2 Verdana (Vietnamese);}{\f1230\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Arial Black CE;}{\f1231\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Arial Black Cyr;}{\f1233\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Arial Black Greek;}
{\f1234\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Arial Black Tur;}{\f1237\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Arial Black Baltic;}{\f1240\fscript\fcharset238\fprq2 Comic Sans MS CE;}{\f1241\fscript\fcharset204\fprq2 Comic Sans MS Cyr;}
{\f1243\fscript\fcharset161\fprq2 Comic Sans MS Greek;}{\f1244\fscript\fcharset162\fprq2 Comic Sans MS Tur;}{\f1247\fscript\fcharset186\fprq2 Comic Sans MS Baltic;}{\f1250\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Impact CE;}{\f1251\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Impact Cyr;}
{\f1253\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Impact Greek;}{\f1254\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Impact Tur;}{\f1257\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Impact Baltic;}{\f1260\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Georgia CE;}{\f1261\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Georgia Cyr;}
{\f1263\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Georgia Greek;}{\f1264\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Georgia Tur;}{\f1267\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Georgia Baltic;}{\f1270\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Medium CE;}
{\f1271\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Medium Cyr;}{\f1273\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Medium Greek;}{\f1274\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Medium Tur;}{\f1277\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Medium Baltic;}
{\f1280\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Palatino Linotype CE;}{\f1281\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Palatino Linotype Cyr;}{\f1283\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Palatino Linotype Greek;}{\f1284\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Palatino Linotype Tur;}
{\f1287\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Palatino Linotype Baltic;}{\f1288\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Palatino Linotype (Vietnamese);}{\f1290\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Trebuchet MS CE;}{\f1291\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Trebuchet MS Cyr;}
{\f1293\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Trebuchet MS Greek;}{\f1294\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Trebuchet MS Tur;}{\f1297\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Trebuchet MS Baltic;}{\f1330\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Microsoft Sans Serif CE;}
{\f1331\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Microsoft Sans Serif Cyr;}{\f1333\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Microsoft Sans Serif Greek;}{\f1334\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Microsoft Sans Serif Tur;}{\f1335\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2 Microsoft Sans Serif (Hebrew);}
{\f1336\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2 Microsoft Sans Serif (Arabic);}{\f1337\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Microsoft Sans Serif Baltic;}{\f1338\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2 Microsoft Sans Serif (Vietnamese);}
{\f1339\fswiss\fcharset222\fprq2 Microsoft Sans Serif (Thai);}{\f1343\fnil\fcharset161\fprq2 Alba Greek;}{\f1353\fnil\fcharset161\fprq2 Alba Matter Greek;}{\f1363\fnil\fcharset161\fprq2 Alba Super Greek;}{\f1373\fnil\fcharset161\fprq2 Baby Kruffy Greek;}
{\f1383\fnil\fcharset161\fprq2 Chick Greek;}{\f1393\fnil\fcharset161\fprq2 Croobie Greek;}{\f1413\fnil\fcharset161\fprq2 Freshbot Greek;}{\f1423\fnil\fcharset161\fprq2 Frosty Greek;}{\f1433\fnil\fcharset161\fprq2 GlooGun Greek;}
{\f1443\fnil\fcharset161\fprq2 Jenkins v2.0 Greek;}{\f1483\fnil\fcharset161\fprq2 Pussycat Greek;}{\f1493\fnil\fcharset161\fprq2 Weltron Urban Greek;}{\f1500\fscript\fcharset238\fprq2 Mistral CE;}{\f1501\fscript\fcharset204\fprq2 Mistral Cyr;}
{\f1503\fscript\fcharset161\fprq2 Mistral Greek;}{\f1504\fscript\fcharset162\fprq2 Mistral Tur;}{\f1507\fscript\fcharset186\fprq2 Mistral Baltic;}{\f1510\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Lucida Sans Unicode CE;}
{\f1511\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Lucida Sans Unicode Cyr;}{\f1513\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Lucida Sans Unicode Greek;}{\f1514\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Lucida Sans Unicode Tur;}{\f1515\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2 Lucida Sans Unicode (Hebrew);}
{\f1630\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Book CE;}{\f1631\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Book Cyr;}{\f1633\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Book Greek;}{\f1634\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Book Tur;}
{\f1637\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Book Baltic;}{\f1640\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Demi CE;}{\f1641\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Demi Cyr;}{\f1643\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Demi Greek;}
{\f1644\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Demi Tur;}{\f1647\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Demi Baltic;}{\f1650\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Medium Cond CE;}{\f1651\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Medium Cond Cyr;}
{\f1653\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Medium Cond Greek;}{\f1654\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Medium Cond Tur;}{\f1657\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Medium Cond Baltic;}{\f1670\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Century Gothic CE;}
{\f1671\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Century Gothic Cyr;}{\f1673\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Century Gothic Greek;}{\f1674\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Century Gothic Tur;}{\f1677\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Century Gothic Baltic;}
{\f1792\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2 @Arial Unicode MS Western;}{\f1790\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 @Arial Unicode MS CE;}{\f1791\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 @Arial Unicode MS Cyr;}{\f1793\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 @Arial Unicode MS Greek;}
{\f1794\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 @Arial Unicode MS Tur;}{\f1795\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2 @Arial Unicode MS (Hebrew);}{\f1796\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2 @Arial Unicode MS (Arabic);}{\f1797\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 @Arial Unicode MS Baltic;}
{\f1798\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2 @Arial Unicode MS (Vietnamese);}{\f1799\fswiss\fcharset222\fprq2 @Arial Unicode MS (Thai);}{\f1802\froman\fcharset0\fprq2 @Batang Western;}{\f1800\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 @Batang CE;}
{\f1801\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 @Batang Cyr;}{\f1803\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 @Batang Greek;}{\f1804\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 @Batang Tur;}{\f1807\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 @Batang Baltic;}{\f1810\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Book Antiqua CE;}
{\f1811\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Book Antiqua Cyr;}{\f1813\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Book Antiqua Greek;}{\f1814\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Book Antiqua Tur;}{\f1817\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Book Antiqua Baltic;}
{\f1820\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Bookman Old Style CE;}{\f1821\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Bookman Old Style Cyr;}{\f1823\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Bookman Old Style Greek;}{\f1824\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Bookman Old Style Tur;}
{\f1827\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Bookman Old Style Baltic;}{\f1830\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Garamond CE;}{\f1831\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Garamond Cyr;}{\f1833\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Garamond Greek;}{\f1834\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Garamond Tur;}
{\f1837\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Garamond Baltic;}{\f1840\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Haettenschweiler CE;}{\f1841\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Haettenschweiler Cyr;}{\f1843\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Haettenschweiler Greek;}
{\f1844\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Haettenschweiler Tur;}{\f1847\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Haettenschweiler Baltic;}{\f1852\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1 @MS Mincho Western;}{\f1850\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1 @MS Mincho CE;}
{\f1851\fmodern\fcharset204\fprq1 @MS Mincho Cyr;}{\f1853\fmodern\fcharset161\fprq1 @MS Mincho Greek;}{\f1854\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1 @MS Mincho Tur;}{\f1857\fmodern\fcharset186\fprq1 @MS Mincho Baltic;}
{\f1870\fscript\fcharset238\fprq2 Monotype Corsiva CE;}{\f1871\fscript\fcharset204\fprq2 Monotype Corsiva Cyr;}{\f1873\fscript\fcharset161\fprq2 Monotype Corsiva Greek;}{\f1874\fscript\fcharset162\fprq2 Monotype Corsiva Tur;}
{\f1877\fscript\fcharset186\fprq2 Monotype Corsiva Baltic;}{\f1882\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2 @SimSun Western;}{\f1900\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Arial Narrow CE;}{\f1901\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Arial Narrow Cyr;}
{\f1903\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Arial Narrow Greek;}{\f1904\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Arial Narrow Tur;}{\f1907\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Arial Narrow Baltic;}{\f1970\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Albertus Medium CE;}
{\f1974\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Albertus Medium Tur;}{\f1977\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Albertus Medium Baltic;}{\f1980\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Albertus CE;}{\f1984\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Albertus Tur;}{\f1987\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Albertus Baltic;}
{\f1990\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Albertus Extra Bold CE;}{\f1994\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Albertus Extra Bold Tur;}{\f1997\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Albertus Extra Bold Baltic;}{\f2000\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 ITC Avant Garde Gothic CE;}
{\f2004\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 ITC Avant Garde Gothic Tur;}{\f2007\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 ITC Avant Garde Gothic Baltic;}{\f2010\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 ITC Avant Garde Gothic Demi CE;}
{\f2014\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 ITC Avant Garde Gothic Demi Tur;}{\f2017\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 ITC Avant Garde Gothic Demi Baltic;}{\f2020\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 ITC Bookman Light CE;}{\f2024\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 ITC Bookman Light Tur;}
{\f2027\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 ITC Bookman Light Baltic;}{\f2030\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 ITC Bookman Demi CE;}{\f2034\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 ITC Bookman Demi Tur;}{\f2037\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 ITC Bookman Demi Baltic;}
{\f2040\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 CG Omega CE;}{\f2044\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 CG Omega Tur;}{\f2047\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 CG Omega Baltic;}{\f2050\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 CG Times CE;}{\f2054\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 CG Times Tur;}
{\f2057\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 CG Times Baltic;}{\f2060\fscript\fcharset238\fprq2 ITC Zapf Chancery CE;}{\f2064\fscript\fcharset162\fprq2 ITC Zapf Chancery Tur;}{\f2067\fscript\fcharset186\fprq2 ITC Zapf Chancery Baltic;}
{\f2070\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Clarendon CE;}{\f2074\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Clarendon Tur;}{\f2077\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Clarendon Baltic;}{\f2080\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Clarendon Condensed CE;}
{\f2084\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Clarendon Condensed Tur;}{\f2087\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Clarendon Condensed Baltic;}{\f2090\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Clarendon Extended CE;}{\f2094\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Clarendon Extended Tur;}
{\f2097\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Clarendon Extended Baltic;}{\f2100\fscript\fcharset238\fprq2 Coronet CE;}{\f2104\fscript\fcharset162\fprq2 Coronet Tur;}{\f2107\fscript\fcharset186\fprq2 Coronet Baltic;}{\f2110\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1 CourierPS CE;}
{\f2114\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1 CourierPS Tur;}{\f2117\fmodern\fcharset186\fprq1 CourierPS Baltic;}{\f2130\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Helvetica Narrow CE;}{\f2134\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Helvetica Narrow Tur;}
{\f2137\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Helvetica Narrow Baltic;}{\f2140\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1 Letter Gothic CE;}{\f2144\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1 Letter Gothic Tur;}{\f2147\fmodern\fcharset186\fprq1 Letter Gothic Baltic;}
{\f2150\fscript\fcharset238\fprq2 Marigold CE;}{\f2154\fscript\fcharset162\fprq2 Marigold Tur;}{\f2157\fscript\fcharset186\fprq2 Marigold Baltic;}{\f2160\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 New Century Schoolbook CE;}
{\f2164\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 New Century Schoolbook Tur;}{\f2167\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 New Century Schoolbook Baltic;}{\f2170\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Antique Olive CE;}{\f2174\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Antique Olive Tur;}
{\f2177\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Antique Olive Baltic;}{\f2180\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Antique Olive Compact CE;}{\f2184\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Antique Olive Compact Tur;}{\f2187\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Antique Olive Compact Baltic;}
{\f2190\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Palatino CE{\*\falt Book Antiqua};}{\f2194\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Palatino Tur{\*\falt Book Antiqua};}{\f2197\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Palatino Baltic{\*\falt Book Antiqua};}{\f2210\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Univers CE;}
{\f2214\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Univers Tur;}{\f2217\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Univers Baltic;}{\f2220\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Univers Condensed CE;}{\f2224\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Univers Condensed Tur;}
{\f2227\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Univers Condensed Baltic;}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255;\red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;
\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0;\red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;\red51\green51\blue51;}{\stylesheet{
\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 \snext0 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph Font;}{\*
\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv 
\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{\s15\ql \li0\ri0\sb240\sa120\keepn\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 
\f4\fs28\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 \sbasedon0 \snext16 Heading;}{\s16\ql \li0\ri0\sa120\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 \sbasedon0 \snext16 Body Text;}{
\s17\ql \li0\ri0\sa120\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f37\fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 \sbasedon16 \snext17 List;}{\s18\ql \li0\ri0\sb120\sa120\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 
\i\f37\fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 \sbasedon0 \snext18 \ssemihidden caption;}{\s19\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f37\fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 \sbasedon0 \snext19 Index;}{
\s20\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext20 Plain Text;}{\s21\ql \fi-1134\li1134\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1134\tx1418\tx9781\nooverflow\faauto\rin0\lin1134\itap0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext21 dday;}{\*\cs22 \additive RTF_Num 2 1;}{\*\cs23 \additive RTF_Num 3 1;}{\*\cs24 \additive RTF_Num 4 1;}{\*\cs25 \additive RTF_Num 5 1;}{\*\cs26 \additive RTF_Num 6 1;}{\*\cs27 
\additive RTF_Num 7 1;}{\*\cs28 \additive RTF_Num 8 1;}{\*\cs29 \additive RTF_Num 9 1;}{\*\cs30 \additive RTF_Num 10 1;}{\*\cs31 \additive RTF_Num 11 1;}{\*\cs32 \additive RTF_Num 12 1;}{\*\cs33 \additive RTF_Num 13 1;}{\*\cs34 \additive RTF_Num 14 1;}{\*
\cs35 \additive RTF_Num 15 1;}{\*\cs36 \additive RTF_Num 16 1;}{\*\cs37 \additive RTF_Num 17 1;}{\*\cs38 \additive RTF_Num 18 1;}{\*\cs39 \additive RTF_Num 19 1;}{\*\cs40 \additive RTF_Num 20 1;}{\*\cs41 \additive RTF_Num 21 1;}{\*\cs42 \additive 
RTF_Num 22 1;}{\*\cs43 \additive RTF_Num 23 1;}{\*\cs44 \additive RTF_Num 24 1;}{\*\cs45 \additive RTF_Num 25 1;}{\*\cs46 \additive RTF_Num 26 1;}{\*\cs47 \additive RTF_Num 27 1;}{\*\cs48 \additive RTF_Num 28 1;}{\*\cs49 \additive RTF_Num 29 1;}{\*\cs50 
\additive RTF_Num 30 1;}{\*\cs51 \additive RTF_Num 31 1;}{\*\cs52 \additive RTF_Num 32 1;}{\*\cs53 \additive RTF_Num 33 1;}{\*\cs54 \additive RTF_Num 34 1;}{\*\cs55 \additive RTF_Num 35 1;}{\*\cs56 \additive RTF_Num 36 1;}{\*\cs57 \additive RTF_Num 37 1;}
{\*\cs58 \additive RTF_Num 38 1;}{\*\cs59 \additive RTF_Num 39 1;}{\*\cs60 \additive RTF_Num 40 1;}{\*\cs61 \additive RTF_Num 41 1;}{\*\cs62 \additive RTF_Num 42 1;}{\*\cs63 \additive RTF_Num 43 1;}{\*\cs64 \additive RTF_Num 44 1;}{\*\cs65 \additive 
RTF_Num 45 1;}{\*\cs66 \additive RTF_Num 46 1;}{\*\cs67 \additive RTF_Num 47 1;}{\*\cs68 \additive RTF_Num 48 1;}{\*\cs69 \additive RTF_Num 49 1;}{\*\cs70 \additive RTF_Num 50 1;}{\*\cs71 \additive RTF_Num 51 1;}{\*\cs72 \additive RTF_Num 52 1;}{\*\cs73 
\additive RTF_Num 53 1;}{\*\cs74 \additive RTF_Num 54 1;}{\*\cs75 \additive RTF_Num 55 1;}{\*\cs76 \additive RTF_Num 56 1;}{\*\cs77 \additive RTF_Num 57 1;}{\*\cs78 \additive RTF_Num 58 1;}{\*\cs79 \additive RTF_Num 59 1;}{\*\cs80 \additive RTF_Num 60 1;}
{\*\cs81 \additive RTF_Num 61 1;}{\*\cs82 \additive RTF_Num 62 1;}{\*\cs83 \additive RTF_Num 63 1;}{\*\cs84 \additive RTF_Num 64 1;}{\*\cs85 \additive RTF_Num 65 1;}{\*\cs86 \additive RTF_Num 66 1;}{\*\cs87 \additive RTF_Num 67 1;}{\*\cs88 \additive 
RTF_Num 68 1;}{\*\cs89 \additive RTF_Num 69 1;}{\*\cs90 \additive RTF_Num 70 1;}{\*\cs91 \additive RTF_Num 71 1;}{\*\cs92 \additive RTF_Num 72 1;}{\*\cs93 \additive RTF_Num 73 1;}{\*\cs94 \additive RTF_Num 74 1;}{\*\cs95 \additive RTF_Num 75 1;}{\*\cs96 
\additive RTF_Num 76 1;}{\*\cs97 \additive RTF_Num 77 1;}{\*\cs98 \additive RTF_Num 78 1;}{\*\cs99 \additive RTF_Num 79 1;}{\*\cs100 \additive RTF_Num 80 1;}{\*\cs101 \additive RTF_Num 81 1;}{\*\cs102 \additive RTF_Num 82 1;}{\*\cs103 \additive 
RTF_Num 83 1;}{\*\cs104 \additive \f3 RTF_Num 84 1;}{\*\cs105 \additive \f2 RTF_Num 84 2;}{\*\cs106 \additive \f10 RTF_Num 84 3;}{\*\cs107 \additive \f3 RTF_Num 84 4;}{\*\cs108 \additive \f2 RTF_Num 84 5;}{\*\cs109 \additive \f10 RTF_Num 84 6;}{\*\cs110 
\additive \f3 RTF_Num 84 7;}{\*\cs111 \additive \f2 RTF_Num 84 8;}{\*\cs112 \additive \f10 RTF_Num 84 9;}{\*\cs113 \additive RTF_Num 85 1;}{\*\cs114 \additive RTF_Num 86 1;}{\*\cs115 \additive RTF_Num 87 1;}{\*\cs116 \additive RTF_Num 88 1;}{\*\cs117 
\additive RTF_Num 89 1;}{\*\cs118 \additive RTF_Num 90 1;}{\*\cs119 \additive RTF_Num 91 1;}{\*\cs120 \additive RTF_Num 92 1;}{\*\cs121 \additive RTF_Num 93 1;}{\*\cs122 \additive RTF_Num 94 1;}{\*\cs123 \additive RTF_Num 95 1;}{\*\cs124 \additive 
RTF_Num 96 1;}{\*\cs125 \additive RTF_Num 97 1;}{\*\cs126 \additive RTF_Num 98 1;}{\*\cs127 \additive RTF_Num 99 1;}{\*\cs128 \additive RTF_Num 100 1;}{\*\cs129 \additive RTF_Num 101 1;}{\*\cs130 \additive RTF_Num 102 1;}{\*\cs131 \additive 
RTF_Num 103 1;}{\*\cs132 \additive RTF_Num 104 1;}{\*\cs133 \additive RTF_Num 105 1;}{\*\cs134 \additive RTF_Num 106 1;}{\*\cs135 \additive RTF_Num 107 1;}}{\*\revtbl {Unknown;}}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid460933\rsid548649\rsid1786625\rsid9113064}
{\*\generator Microsoft Word 10.0.6612;}{\info{\author matt}{\operator John Palmer}{\creatim\yr2007\mo7\dy21\hr20\min56}{\revtim\yr2007\mo7\dy30\hr18\min44}{\printim\yr2113\mo1\dy1}{\version3}{\edmins51}{\nofpages149}{\nofwords66390}{\nofchars378428}
{\*\company  University of Hull}{\nofcharsws443931}{\vern16389}}\deftab1080\widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\makebackup\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\hyphcaps0\horzdoc\dghspace120\dgvspace120\dghorigin1701\dgvorigin1984\dghshow0\dgvshow3
\jcompress\viewkind4\viewscale100\nolnhtadjtbl\rsidroot9113064 \fet0\sectd \sbknone\linex0\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3
\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}
{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain 
\s21\qc \fi-1080\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\nooverflow\faauto\rin0\lin1080\itap0\pararsid1786625 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\b\insrsid9113064 NOTES
\par }{\insrsid9113064\charrsid460933 (version 1a)}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }\pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid1786625 \fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 {\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Details from the Tax Returns for Dorset (Exon 17a1 to 24a2; see \{Introduction: Tax Returns\}
) have only been given in the Notes in the following instances: where they support a place-name identification; where they supply or suggest a byname for a holder given only a simple name in Domesday; where they record tax unpaid in cases where the identi
fication of the holding is fairly certain. Not included are conjectural identifications, nor exact identifications where the return adds no information to Domesday, nor where there are large discrepancies in the lordship land.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab When quoting from the text, the abbreviated forms are retained wherever possible, or the extensions to them are enclosed in square brackets; only where there is no doubt is the Latin extended silently. The Anglo-Saxon}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 letters thorn (\'fe) and eth (\'f0) are reproduced as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 th}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab These Notes follow the numbered order of the text, ignoring displacements in the manuscript; thus the notes for DOR 51 (which was added later) follow those for DOR 50, rather than those for DOR 54.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 DORSET. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote the running title}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  DORSETE.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 in vermilion capitals across the top of folios 75ab-75cd, 77ab-80cd, 82ab-85a, centred above both columns, and also at the head of the List of Landholders on folio 75a and in 1,8. There is no running title on the inserted pieces of parchment (fol
ios 76ab and 81ab,cd), nor on folio 85cd which is blank.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid1786625 
\par }\pard \ql \fi-1080\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\faauto\rin0\lin1080\itap0\pararsid1786625 {\cf1\insrsid9113064 B1\tab [Exon 11b1]}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab THE DETAILS of only four boroughs are listed in this section on Boroughs, but there appears to have been a fifth borough in Dorset in 1086: Wimborne Minster. Although never actua
lly called a borough in Domesday, it had burgesses and houses. The information on it appears in several places in Domesday Dorset (1,3;21;31. 14,1. 31,1). Details of boroughs in the adjacent Somerset are similarly scattered across the text of that county.
 Wimborne Minster appears to be first called a borough in 1362; see }{\insrsid9113064 Beresford and Finberg, }{\i\insrsid9113064 English Medieval Boroughs}{\insrsid9113064 , p. 105.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WERE 172 HOUSES ... 88 HOUSES THERE ... 100 ... DESTROYED. If one of these figures is not in error, the difference probably suggests new building since Hugh's time.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab For Domesday's '88 houses there', the corresponding entry in Exon has '88 [houses] still standing'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab THEY ANSWERED ... GUARDS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'They paid tax in 1066 for 10 hides, that is, 1 silver mark for the guards' use, and for every service of the king they answered for 10 hides'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab Latin s}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 e defendebant}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 /}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 defendebat pro }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('they/it answered for')}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
is a common phrase in other Domesday counties (for example, Sussex, Buckinghamshire, Bedfordshire, Hertfordshire) where it means the same as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 geldabant/geldabat pro }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
('they/he paid tax for'). Here the meaning is slightly different.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab HIDES. The hide is a unit of land measurement, either of productivity, of extent or of tax liability, and contained 4 virga
tes. Administrators attempted to standardize the hide at 120 acres, but incomplete revision and special local reductions left hides of widely differing extents in different areas. See 36,4 hides note; and JRM in SUS \{Appendix; the Hide\}.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 1 SILVER MARK. That is, 13s 4d.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab FOR THE USE OF THE GUARDS. Latin }{\i\f827\cf1\insrsid9113064 ad opus Huscarli\'fb}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The meaning of the fairly common Domesday phrase ad }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
opus }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 varies with the context: here the silver mark is for the guards' upkeep. In HEF 1,2 }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 opus }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is 'use' where a contras
t is implied between money going to the king and what the sheriff receives for administering the land; see also 30,4 mill note. Exon sometimes has, for example, 'value to the bishop' where Domesday has 'value for the bishop's use' (see SOM 6,1 use note); 
and see DOR 11,1 lordship note for a correspondence between 'lordship' and 'use' in the value statement. The predominant Latin meaning of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 opus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
however, is 'work' and there are occasions in Domesday where this is the appropriate rendering. It can also mean 'benefit'; see DEV 15,67 manor note and Worcester H2 in WOR \{Appendix\}.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab NIGHT'S REVENUE. See 1,2 revenue note. Dorchester on its own did not pay one night's revenue, but combined with others in 1,4 to provide it. Similarly for Bridport and Wareham. See Round, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal England}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 113-14.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab MONEYERS ... COINAGE WAS CHANGED. See HEF C9 where on the renewal of the coinage each of the 7 moneyers gave 18s for acquiring the dies and then had a month in which to pay the king 20s. In SHR C11 the 20s had to be paid
 on the 15th day after the moneyers bought their dies.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab PAYING ... 20s. Domesday uses the old English currency system which lasted for a thousand years until 1971. The pound contained 20 shillings, each of 12 pence, abbreviated respectively as \'a3(ibrae), s
(olidi) and d(enarii). Domesday often expresses sums above a shilling in pence (as 35d in 1,2) and above a pound in shillings (for example, 110s in 1,3).}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 100 HAVE BEEN COMPLETELY DESTROYED. Opinion seems to be divided on the cause of the destruction of 
so many houses here and in Wareham and Shaftesbury. According to Taylor, 'Norman Settlement of Gloucestershire', p. 61, they were probably destroyed when in 1068 King William and his men marched towards Exeter (which had refused to surrender to him). Eyto
n, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dorset }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Survey, p. 72, believed that the destruction was perhaps due to internal conflicts between the English and Norman burgesses. Other views, which the phraseology of Great Domesday and Exon Domesday appears to support, are that Hugh the sheriff (see 
B1 Hugh note) was responsible for the devastation, perhaps when clearing ground for work on the castles (compare GLS G4); see Morris, 'Office of Sheriff', p. 162 note 148; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 27.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab HUGH THE SHERIFF. Hugh son of Grip (also called Hugh of Wa
reham; see 23,1 Hugh note) was sheriff of Dorset before Aiulf the chamberlain (see DOR 49 Aiulf note). He was dead by the date of the Tax Returns (1084-1086), if not earlier, and his wife held many of his lands (see DOR 55). He took lands from the churche
s
 of Shaftesbury, Abbotsbury (see 13,1 hide note) and Cerne, as well as from lay tenants. Exon 36b3 (= DOR 11,5) is outspoken about the losses caused by his depredations; see WOR 26 Urso note for the similar behaviour of Urso of Abetot, sheriff of Worceste
rshire. For a discussion of the injustices caused by sheriffs, as well as their judicial, military and financial duties, see Morris, 'Office of Sheriff' pp. 158-63.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 B2\tab [Exon 12a1]
\par \tab THEY ANSWERED ... KING'S GUARDS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'They paid tax in 1066 for 5 hides, that is, \'bd silver mark for the guards' use, and for every service of the king they answered for 5 hides'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab ONE NIGHT'S REVENUE. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'the night's revenue'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 100 HOUSES THERE. The corresponding entry in Exon has '100 [houses] still standing'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 20 HAVE BEEN SO NEGLECTED THAT ... PAY TAX. The corresponding entry in Exon has '20 of these 100 houses have been so ruined that (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ita s}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 un]t adnichilate q}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 uo}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 d}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 interlined in a paler ink; Ellis misprinted }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 na }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 for }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ita}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ) ... pay tax.}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
And 20 houses have been completely destroyed from the time of Hugh the sheriff'. It is not clear whether these are the same 20 houses as those 'ruined'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 B3\tab [Exon 12b1]}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 143 HOUSES IN THE KING'S LORDSHIP. The corresponding entry in Exon has '143 houses in the king's lordship which}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 paid tax'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab THIS TOWN ... KING'S GUARDS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'This town paid tax in 1066 for 10 hides, that is, 1}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 silver mark f
or the guards' use, and for every service of the king it answered for 10 hides'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab ONE NIGHT'S REVENUE. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'the night's revenue'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 70 HOUSES THERE. The corresponding entry in Exon has '70 [houses] standing'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab FROM THE TIME OF HUGH THE SHERIFF. The corresponding entry in Exon adds 'until now'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ^[THE ABBEY OF]^ SAINT-WANDRILLE.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  See DOR 18 abbey note.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab The corresponding entry in Exon has 'The Abbot of Saint-Wandrille'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab DERELICT. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'destroyed (}{\i\f820\cf1\insrsid9113064 destruct\'ea}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab OTHER BARONS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'other of the king's barons'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 B4\tab [Exon 11a1-2]}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab IN THE BOROUGH OF SHAFTESBURY. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'In [the borough of] St Edward (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 in s}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 an}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 c}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 t}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 o}{\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 eduuardo}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )'.}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Shaftesbury was sometimes called after Edward the Martyr to whom its abbey was dedicated.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 104 HOUSES IN THE KING'S LORDSHIP. The corresponding entry in Exon has '104 houses in the king's lordship which}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 paid tax'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab THIS TOWN ANSWERED ... KING'S GUARDS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'It paid tax in 1066 for 20 hides, that is, 2 silver marks}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
for the guards' use, and it always answered for every service of the king for 20 hides'.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab In the Domesday manuscript and Farley there is a full stop after }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 regis}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 the Ordnance Survey facsimile does not reproduce it.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 66 HOUSES THERE. The corresponding entry in Exon has '66 [houses] standing solidly (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 stantes in uirtute}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )'.}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Ellis misprinted a}{
\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 gap after }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 stantes}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ABBESS [* OF SHAFTESBURY *]. The Abbess of }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 St Mary's, Shaftesbury (DOR 19).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 111 HOUSES THERE. The corresponding entry in Exon has '111 houses standing'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab THE ABBESS HAS 151 BURGESSES ... 65s. Omitted from Exon; for the two other major additions}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Dorset by the main scribe of Great Domesday, see 11,12 l
and note and 36,2 water note (and compare 36,3 meadow note). There are}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 only about twenty-five such additions in those parts of the five south-western counties for}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
which Exon survives.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 L1\tab NOTES ON MAJOR LANDHOLDERS appear at the heads of their respective chapters.}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Notes referring to other individuals are under their first occurrence in the text.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab It would seem that in Dorset the main scribe of Great Domesday had already begun at least the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Terra Regis }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
when he came to write the Landholders' List (and possibly also the section on boroughs, though these may have been written first of all) and that he had left himself insufficient room for the List. Normally the Landholders are indexed in two columns of mo
re or less equal length; in Dorset, however, no account is taken of the rulings and in the first column 24 entries (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 I}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 -}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 XXIV}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
) are squeezed in and in the second 27 entries (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 XXV}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 -}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 LI}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ) occupy almost the same length of parchment (not as Farley printed). }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 LII}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064  to }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 LVII}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  are then written on the last ruled line of the folio, across folio 75ab; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 LVIII}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  is added below }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 LVII}{
\f823\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; they are linked to the second column of the List by transposition signs in the form of a decorated and rubricated upsilon (\'f8) (Farley printed 'hands'). Alf}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
red of 'Spain' was omitted from the list and a number given to the land of Isolde; see DOR 45 Alfred note. In the Phillimore printed edition Farley's text was cut to fit the page, the entries at the bottom of folio 75b (L 54-58 inclusive, though DOR 55-58
 in the text) forming a further three lines, indented.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 L8\tab GLASTONBURY. In the manuscript the abbreviation at the end of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Glastingbe}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  is}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 not as Farley printed it: it resembles a capital }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 R }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 with a diagonal line through it, not the abbreviation sign which is like a }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 z }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 with a tail, the sign normally used by the main scribe of Great Domesday after }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 q }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (= }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 quarentina}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 'furlong').}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 L22\tab FOR THE DISCREPANCY between the numbering of the Landholders' List and that of the text, see DOR 22 Landholders note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 L23\tab FOR THE DISCREPANCY between the numbering of the Landholders' List and that of the text, see DOR 22 Landholders note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 L45\tab FOR THE DISCREPANCY between the numbering of the Landholders' List and that of}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 the text for this and the following chapters (L46-55), see DOR 45 Alfred note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 1\tab LAND OF THE KING.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  This was entered by the main scribe of Great Domesday in four distinct groups:}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab 1,1-6 Portland (1,1) and five groups of royal manors (1,2-6) forming the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 vetus dominicum coronae }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (land held }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 T.R.E.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 by King Edward), each group providing a half or one night's revenue;}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab 1,7-14 lands formerly held by 'Earl' Harold;}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab 1,15-29 lands held by and from Queen Matilda (William's queen, died 1083);}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab 1,30-31 lands held by Countess Goda, King Edward's sister.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab Exon enters the manors somewhat differently. The first section headed }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dominicatus Regis in Dorseta}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 (folios 25a-28b) contains holdings in the following order: l,7-8;14;9-10;1;11-13;2-4. [24,1.] 1,5-6. [24,2. 18,1. 24,3. 18,2]; for a holding in 'Winterborne' not in Domesday, see 1,6 'Winterborne' note and DOR 49 Aiulf note. The section headed }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Terra Regine Mathildis in Dorseta}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  (folios 29a-30b) corresponds to 1,15-21, while that headed }{\i\f820\cf1\insrsid9113064 Terr\'ea Quas Ten}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ebant Milites de Regina in Dorseta}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064  (folios 31a-32a) corresponds to 1,22-25;27-29;26. There are no corresponding entries in the extant portion of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Liber Exoniensis}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  for 1,30-31, which were added; see 1,30 entry note.}{
\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab There is a discussion of the arrangement and a table of the supposed members of the royal manors in Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dorset Survey}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 78-101.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab The main scribe of Great Domesday omitted the rubricated }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 I }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 beside the chapter heading; in a great many counties in Domesday the initial chapter numbers are 
omitted, probably in error.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 1,1\tab [Exon 26a1]
\par \tab PORTLAND. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The land probably included }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wik' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Helewill' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Wyke Regis, SY6577,}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
and Holwell in Radipole, SY6583 (rather than Elwell in Upwey as proposed by F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 158);}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 90, Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 850, and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 267] as well as Melcombe Regis (SY6880)}{\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 and Weymouth (SY6779).}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab The fact that Exon has 'which King Edward held on the day on which he was alive', omitting }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 et mortuus }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
('and dead'), its usual formula for pre-1066 tenure, lends some support to the idea that King Edward did bequeath Portland to the Old Minster, Winchester, but the writ announcing this bequest is of doubtful authenticity; see Harmer, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Anglo-Saxon Writs}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 112 p. 400, and pp. 385-87, 526-27. The bequest was presumably to take effect after King}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Edward's death, but was ignored by King William and no claim by the monks of Winchester}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 appears in Domesday. However, in a writ of Henry I, dated 1100 x 1107, the monks of St Swithun's}{\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 of Winchester are to hold Portland given them by King Edward (and also }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wike}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  portum}{\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Waimuth }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Melecumbe }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 with their dependencies); see Galbraith, 'Royal Charters to}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Winchester' p. 390 no. xviii; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ii. p. 52 no. 745.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab DURING HIS LIFE. [***]. The rest of the line has been left blank after this, perhaps for the}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 plough estimate. Exon does not give any additional information. Other examples of gaps}{
\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 left in Domesday being paralleled by lack of information in Exon include 1,26. 11,13;16. 55,28}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and perhaps 55,10.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 100 SMALLHOLDERS. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 bordarii}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 apparently from a Frankish word }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 borda }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
('a wooden hut').}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 In Domesday they are usually listed after the villagers, but before the cottagers, who, though very}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 similar in 
many respects (see 1,2 cottagers note and 1,8 cottagers note), seem to have been poorer. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bordarii }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 form}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
almost half the recorded population in Domesday Dorset. They frequently hold land (for example, in}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 12,16. 55,5 and 56,56), as well as ploughs, and in 1,2
3 1 smallholder paid 30d and in 57,2 2 smallholders paid 20d (see 57,2 smallholders note). It would seem probable that smallholders also owed their lords some form of labour service; see HEF 19,1. See MDX \{Appendix\}
 on a summary of the land holdings of smallholders, among other classes, in that county, and Lennard, 'Bordars and Cottars'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 100 LESS 10. This edition keeps to the exact translation here and elsewhere with }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 minus}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
rather than translating as 90, because sometimes the reason for the subtraction is noted}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (for example, in WIL 2,1 '100 hides, less 3' where the removal of the 3 hides is explained).}{\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 Exon has the same phrase.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab ACRES. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Acra }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (Exon }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 agra}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  ager}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
is used in Domesday both as a linear measure (as in 5,1. 26,40. 54,9;11) and as a square measure, as here. See 5,1 woodland note on the linking of furlongs and acres in measurements and 36,4 hides note on the number of acres in a hide.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab FURLONGS. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 quarentina}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Exon }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 quadragenaria}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 a subdivision of the league (see 1,2}{\insrsid9113064  leagues }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 note), reckoned at 220 yards, an eighth of a mile. The largest number of furlongs recorded}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
in one entry in Dorset is pasture 42 furlongs long in 54,6. In a great number of cases in Domesday}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 the furlong is used linearly, both measurements of the land being given, as here. In many}{\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 other instances, however, only one measurement is given, as in 1,7 'pasture, 2 furlongs';}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 it is possible that here the furlong is being used as a square measure, the pasture measuring}{
\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 2 furlongs by 1 furlong (so Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dorset Survey}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 pp. 31-35). However, there is a good deal of}{\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 evidence to suggest that to the main scribe of Great Domesday the phrase 'pasture, 2 furlongs' meant}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 'pasture, 2 furlongs in length and 2 furlongs in width' (= 4 square furlongs of pasture);}{
\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see 55,29 pasture note; 55,36 pasture note; 55,38 woodland note; 55,40 woodland note. There, in the first instance (55,29), for Domesday's plain 'pasture,}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
8 furlongs', the corresponding entry in Exon has 'pasture, 8 furlongs in both length and width'. The facts that on}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 several occasions Exon also gives just the one measurement (as for 1,11 'pasture, 6}{
\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 furlongs') and that Domesday often has the phrase (as in 41,1) 'pasture, 4 furlongs in length}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
and width' suggest that the phrases were interchangeable when the length and width of}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 the land were the same.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab COBS. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Roncini}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 probably pack-horses. However, see SOM 8,5 horses note where }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 roncinos }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
is glossed above }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 caballos }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 which is ordinarily to be translated 'riding horses', 'war horses', but in that case Medieval Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 caballus }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 may be r
eflecting Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 capel}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Old Norse }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 kapall }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('a nag').}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab CATTLE. Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 animalia}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 commonly called }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 animalia otiosa }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
('idle animals') elsewhere, that is, beef or dairy cattle in contrast to ploughing oxen, though occasionally in Exon and Domesday they seem 
to be oxen (see SOM 25,41 plough note; CON 4,23 plough note; DEV 17,28 ploughs note; DEV 17,39 plough note; and NTH 48,13). Cattle and other animals were generally omitted from Domesday, though sometimes they were mistakenly not eliminated when the origin
al returns were abstracted (see GLS 3,7 and GLS 3,7 animal note); sometimes they may have been included to make a particular point, as probably in HRT 31,8 where a catalogue of livestock etc. is given for land wrongfully appropriated by Bishop Odo.}{
\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab PIGS. Without doubt there were a great many more pigs in Dorset than Exon records, as only those pigs which formed part of the lordship are given, whereas according to Lennard, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Rural England}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 255-60, the pigs were largely the responsibility of the special pig-farmers (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 porcarii}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
or the 'villagers' themselves. See DEV 1,18 pigs note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab SHEEP. Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 oues }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
('ewes'), providing milk, cheese, wool and mutton. Sheep were extremely important in the economy of Dorset, several hundred frequently being recorded on individual manors in the surviving portion of Exon.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab THIS MANOR ... PAYS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'This manor ... pays ... a year'; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 per annum }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
here and elsewhere with values of manors and, generally, with the payments of mills (for example, 1,8).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab BLANCHED. Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 albas}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 also }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 candidas }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 blancas }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Domesday. A sample of coin was melted as a tes
t for the presence of alloy or baser metal. Money could also be said to be blanched when, without a test by fire, a standard deduction was made to compensate for alloying or clipping; see }{\insrsid9113064 Richard Fitz Nigel, }{\i\insrsid9113064 
Dialogus de Scaccario}{\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\insrsid9113064  }{\insrsid9113064 (Johnson, }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 p. 125).}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 1,2\tab [Exon 27a1]
\par \tab THIS ENTRY and the following four (1,3-6) each consist of a number of manors grouped partly on a geographical basis, but made up so that each group can contribute one night's revenue; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, iii. p. 28. Similar groupings are found in the other Wessex shires of Somerset, Hampshire and Wiltshire.
\par \tab \tab This particular group lies predominantly in the south-west of the county to which have been added Bere Regis and Colber. Outlying portions of some of the manors of this group may have been Kingston Russell (SY5891), held as }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Kingeston' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 by}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 John }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Russel }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 92 (see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 1268), and possibly Litton Cheney (SY5590), a major holding not so far identified with any Domesday land, but which may have been the holding of Hugh of Boscherbert (53,2 land note); see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , vi. (Edward II) no. 724; Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 749.
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
The corresponding entry in Exon has 'The king has 1 manor called Burton ... Chideock'. In the value paragraph, however, it has 'These manors ... pay'. It would appear that the Exon scribe began the entry (and those
 corresponding to 1,3-6) in the normal manner, realizing by the end of the entry that a group of manors was involved.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab BURTON [BRADSTOCK].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bridetone}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 named like the places called Bredy from the River Bride; see F\'e4gersten, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 256. Burton lay in 'Goderthorn' Hundred; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 34, 54.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab BERE [REGIS]. It was h}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 eld later by the Earl of Hereford; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 11. It was sometimes called }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Kyngesber'}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 :}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 28, 44, 48. See 1,27 "Scetre" note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab COLBER.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Now represented by Colber Crib House in Sturminster Newton: F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 48.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab SHIPTON [GORGE].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  In 'Goderthorn' Hundred, held by Thomas }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Gorges }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from the Countess of Albemarle (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Albemarlie}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 10; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 425; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. pp. 34, 54.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab BRADPOLE.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 1268, records 1 \'bd virgates outlying at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Kenilecumb' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Lower Kingcombe, SY5599]; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 92; and 47,7 Wraxall note. Kingsland in Netherbury (SY4597) was probably an outlying part; see Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 109.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab CHIDEOCK.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  See 26,63 Wootton note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab IT IS NOT KNOWN ... AND THEY DID NOT PAY TAX. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'It is not known ... because they did not pay tax'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab THEY DID NOT PAY TAX. Or perhaps 'it', referring to the group of places as a whole (see Domesday's use of 'this, manor' in the value statement). Similarly for 1,3-6. See 1,2 known note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab LAND FOR 55 PLOUGHS. This estimate of the ploughlands, very common in the south\-
west counties and elsewhere in Domesday, but rare in Gloucestershire, Worcestershire and Herefordshire, is a convenient way of giving the true arable extent without the complexities associated with the hide (see B1 hides note). It does not alwa
ys agree with the details of the ploughs recorded in lordship and on the villagers' land. On a little less than half the occasions where both details are given do they tally with the assessment, and on about the same number of occasions (as here) they fal
l
 short (sometimes, as in 24,4. 26,50 and 56,57 a space has been left for one or other of the details). In some twenty-nine instances more ploughs are recorded than are estimated, sometimes as many as six more (as in 12,14); in some seven entries (for exam
ple, 7,1) attention is expressly drawn to this fact. On the frequent artificiality of the numbers in the plough assessment, see Finn, 'Teamland', pp. 97-98; Moore, 'Domesday Teamland'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 41 VILLAGERS. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 xli uill}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 anu}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 s}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
The singular occurs regularly in Domesday with 21, 31 etc. Compare }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 p}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ro}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  .xxi. hida }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in 13,1. But see 36,4: }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 viginti 7 un}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 us}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  tein}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 us}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  tenuer}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 unt}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ].}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 7 FREEDMEN. Domesday}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  coliberti}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
former slaves. A continental term, not otherwise found in England; used in Domesday to render a native term, stated on three occasions to be (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ge}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 bur }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
(WOR 8,10a and HAM 1,10;23). The }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 coliberti }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 are found mainly in the counties in
Wessex and western Mercia, particularly in Wiltshire and Somerset. There were 33 freedmen recorded in Domesday Dorset, 20 on the king's land and 13 on Glastonbury Abbey land, some of them being listed with the villagers and holding ploughs (as here), othe
rs (as in 1,4-5) appearing with the slaves and so perhaps working the lordship ploughs. In other counties in Domesday some held land (SOM 2,1 etc.) and paid dues (HEF 1,6. WOR 8,7 etc.). See Vinogradoff, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
English Society in the Eleventh Century}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 468-69; Maitland, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Domesday Book and Beyond}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 36-37, 328-30; and OXF boors note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 74 COTTAGERS. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 cotarii}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 inhabitants of a }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 cote}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 sometimes with land of their own (as in MDX 2,2. 3,1 etc.; see MDX \{Appendix\}), but in Dorset they are only stated as having a share in the ploughs and land. See 1,8 Cottagers note on the allied group }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 coscez }
{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('Cottagers'). The terms }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 cotarius }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 bordarius }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
('smallholder'; see 1,1 smallholders note) were sometimes confused: in the summary of the Glastonbury lordship holding in Exon folio 527b4 the 72 }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 bordarii }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 correspond to the 40 }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 bordarii 
}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and 32 }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 cotarii }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 of SOM 8,1;3. See also Lennard, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Rural England}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, pp. 346, 353-54; Lennard, 'Bordars and Cottars'. Likewise two of the Exon scribes dealing with Devon material never used the terms }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 cotarii }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 coceti }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 but only }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 bordarii}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and it is more likely that the former categories were included with the latter, than that there were no 'cottagers' on so many manors; see Finn, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Liber Exoniensis}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 50.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab LEAGUES. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 leuga}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  leuua}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  leuuede}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 . A}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
measure of length, usually of woodland and pasture, traditionally reckoned at a mile and a half. If so, some will have been of enormous length (see Round in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Northamptonshire}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, i. p. 280; and WOR 1,1c leagues note). The league is used regularly as a linear m
easure, both measurements being given for the land, as here. In the numerous entries where only one measurement is given, it is possible that the league, like the furlong apparently (see 1,1 furlongs note), is not being used as a square measure (as Eyton,
 }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dorset Survey}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
pp. 31-35), but that the same figure represents both the length and width. Thus in 17,2 ('pasture, 2 leagues') the pasture would have actually measured 2 leagues in length and 2 leagues in breadth.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WOODLAND ... WIDE. The main scribe of Gre
at Domesday may have intended to leave blank the rest of the line after this for more information to be added when available. Or the gap may be the usual one left before the 'value' statement, as appears regularly in other counties (for example, Worcester
shire and Gloucestershire). A similar gap occurs in 1,4. 3,6. 10,2. 55,10;44 etc.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab ONE NIGHT'S REVENUE. Many royal manors, especially in the south-west, had to pay this revenue which took the place of the normal tax payment, the manors not usually being as
sessed in hides. Originally this meant the amount of food needed to support the king and his household for one night, though by the eleventh century these food rents were generally commuted. From examples in Somerset and Hampshire \'a3
80 appears to be a probable figure before 1066, and \'a3100 after, for one night's revenue; see Poole }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Exchequer in the Twelfth }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Century, p. 29. It would seem that in Dorset, as in Gloucestershire (GLS 1,9;11;13) and sometimes in Wiltshire (for example, WIL 1,2-4), these rents were no
t commuted. In Domesday Somerset, as here, there are several instances of manors combining to provide this rent; see SOM l,2 revenue note; SOM 1,10 revenue note). Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 firma }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 here represents Old English}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  feorm}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  ('a food rent'); }{\insrsid9113064 see }{\i\insrsid9113064 Oxford English Dictionary}{\insrsid9113064 , under farm (substantive i). }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 1,9 value note for another sense of }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 firma }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and also HEF1,1 night's revenue note and HEF 1,1 revenue note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab SCRUBLAND AT 'HAWCOMBE' ... CAEN. In the manuscript }{\i\f827\cf1\insrsid9113064 Boscus de havoc\'fbbe}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Farley misprinted }{\i\f827\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Boscus ten' havoc\'fbbe}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 as if }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Boscus }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
were a personal name, the holder of 'Hawcombe'. 'Hawcombe' is a lost name in the area of Shipton Hill (SY5092); see Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 284. It is placed by Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Dorset Survey}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 p. 85, in Burton Bradstock parish and by F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 260, in Shipton Gorge parish.
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Scrubland at 'Hawcombe' belongs to the said manor, that is, Burton [Bradstock]. In 1066 two parts of this scrubland were attached to the king's revenue in such a
 way that (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ita ut}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 no one had any part of this scrubland except for Earl Godwin who had by reckoning (}{\i\f827\cf1\insrsid9113064 per adnumeration\'e7}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 the third oak of this scrubland: this [third oak] now belongs to the manor of Saint-Etienne, Caen, called Frampton'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab [AND BELONGED] IN SUCH A WAY. The main scribe of Great Domesday seems to have had trouble with the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ita ut }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
phrase in Exon (see 1,2 scrubland note), hence the need for the bracketed words in the translation.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab EARL EDWIN. In Exon 'Earl Godwin', which is prob
ably correct, as his wife, Gytha, held Frampton (17,1) before 1066, to which the third oak of 'Hawcombe' belonged by 1086. Earl Godwin was Earl of the West Saxons and father of Earl (King) Harold and Edith (wife of King Edward); he died in 1053.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 1,3\tab [Exon 27a2]
\par \tab THESE MANORS lie in the eastern part of the county. For Knowlton, which would form a natural geographical grouping with them, see 1,6.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab WIMBORNE [MINSTER]}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  ... WIMBORNE [ST GILES]. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Winborne}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Opewinburne}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 Between them the two places called 'Wimborne' must have covered a considerable area although the hidage was not known in 1086. Wimborne Minster included the manors of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Kyngesto }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ' and }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bernardesleye }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Kingston Lacy in Pamphill, SZ9701 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 167), and Barnsley farms also in Pamphill, SZ9903]: }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 14, see pp. 32, 51; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 91; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, i. p. 97a. 'Up Wimborne', conveniently distinguished by Domesday, will have included at least}{\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Winterborn' Malemains }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 750), otherwise }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Up Wymburn Malemeyns}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 28), held from the honour of Gloucester, that is the parish of Wimborne St Giles (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 263), as well as All Hallows farm (SU0212; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 264) and Monkton Up Wimborne (SU0113; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 265). For 'Philipston', see 20,2 Wimborne note. For the river name, see\{
Introduction: Places Named from Rivers\}.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab SHAPWICK. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 14; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 91; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 97a.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab [MOOR] CRICHEL. Domesday }{\i\insrsid9113064 Chirce}{\insrsid9113064 . It was identified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 65 no. 3 as Crichel and by }{\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{
\insrsid9113064  as Long Crichel and/or Moor Crichel.}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 There are now two parishes, Moor Crichel in Badbury Hundred and Long Crichel in Knowlton Hundred
. The latter is found in the same hundred in 1086 (see 34,11 Crichel note and 49,16 Crichel note), but the former cannot be found in a Tax Return. Since Domesday does not give its extent, it is not clear whether the land involved both places called Criche
l or only one. There was certainly royal land at Moor Crichel in Badbury Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 14, held as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Kerchil Sifrast }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from the honour of Chewton in }
{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 753 (see 56,14 Edwin note), also at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Parva Kerchelle }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 14 
['Little Crichel', lost in Moor Crichel; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 141] and at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Kerchel Freinel }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
in Badbury Hundred which was granted with Shapwick and 'Up Wimborne' to the Count of Meulan by Henry I (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 91). This is also identified with 'Little Crichel' by }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 141.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab GOATS. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Caprae}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 she-goats, important for their milk.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab THIS MANOR WITH ITS DEPENDENCIES PAYS ... . The corresponding entry in Exon has 'These manors with their dependencies and customary dues pay ...'. See 1,2 Burton note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 1,4\tab [Exon 27b1]
\par \tab A GROUP OF ROYAL MANORS mainly close to Dorchester, but including Gillingham in the north of the county.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab DORCHESTER. Royal land, either part of Dorchester or of the unidentified 'Frome' below, lay at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Kyngeston Crubbe }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Kingston Maurward in Stinsford parish, SY7191] in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 17, 31, and probably at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cherleton }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Charlton, SY6895, in Charminster parish] held by Thomas }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Hyneton }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 from the Earl of Lincoln in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 31, 51, as well as at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wolfeton }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Wolfeton, SY6792, in Charminster parish] held by Thomas }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Maubaunk }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Byngeham }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. pp. 31, 51. All these places lay in Dorchester (later St George) Hundred; see 26,5 'Cerne' note, 27,4 Mayne note and 53,1 'Cerne' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 
FORDINGTON. This former Liberty occupied a crescent-shaped area to the east, south and west of Dorchester, Fordington being marked at SY6990 on the first edition one-inch Ordnance Survey map (sheet 17 of 1811, reprint sheet 92 of 1969); Fordington Fields 
are south of the borough and Fordington Down is at SY6691 on current maps; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 348. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 88-89, it included }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Witewill' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Frome Whitwell, SY6791, now in Bradford Peverell parish, possibly the unidentified 'Frome' below; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 379], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Burton' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Burton, SY6891, now in Charminster parish], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Herleg }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (or }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Ertleg' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 379, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hertleye }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , v. (Edward II) no. 404) [Hartley farm in Minterne Magna, ST6406] and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dalewde }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Dalwood, ST2400, formerly a detached part of Dorset, transferred to Devon in 1832; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, i. p. 100]. The Liberty of Fordington also included 'Loops' (in Dorchester) and Hermitage parish (ST6407); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. pp. 334, 363; Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 414, 791.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab SUTTON [POYNTZ].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  In Cullifordtree Hundred. It later formed part of the honour of Gloucester and was held from it in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 95, by Nicholas }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Puinz}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 18, it is said to include }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Prestone }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
[Preston, SY7083], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Podintone }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Putton in Chickerell, SY 6580], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Estchykerel }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [East Chickerell; for West Chickerell see 56,8 Chickerell note] and }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Sutwaye }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ['Southwey', lost in Broadwey: }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 201]; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 38, 57; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iv. (Edward II) no. 346.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab GILLINGHAM. A }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 villa regalis }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 21.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab `FROME'. Domesday }{\i\insrsid9113064 Frome}{\insrsid9113064 . }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 This holding, which cannot at present be identified, is named from the River Frome; see \{Introduction: Places Named from Rivers\}. }{
\insrsid9113064 It was left unidentified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 65 no. 4. }{\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{\insrsid9113064  identified it as Chilfrome and/or Frome Vauchurch }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
but without supporting evidence; see 1,4 Dorchester note and 1,4 Fordington note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab HIDES ARE THERE. Latin }{\i\f820\cf1\insrsid9113064 hid\'ea sint ibi}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 subjunctive, here and in 1,5-6; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 s't }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
in 1,2-3 which could abbreviate }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 sint }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 sunt}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Exon has }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 s't }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 throughout. 
}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Sint }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 occurs in the same phrase in the first chapter of Wiltshire, Somerset and Devon. The subjunctive and indicative are interchangeable in indirect questions in Medieval Latin. But see Round, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal England}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 109 and note 200.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab THIS MANOR WITH ITS DEPENDENCIES PAYS ... . The corresponding entry in Exon has 'These manors with their dependencies and customary dues pay ...'. See 1,2 Burton note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 1,5\tab [Exon 27b3]
\par \tab THESE MANORS lie within four miles of one another in the eastern central part of the county.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab PIMPERNE. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 It probably included Blandford Forum, not separately mentioned in Domesday; see 26,29 Blandford note; and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, i. p. 97a. It was later associated with Kingston Lacy; see 1,3 Wimborne note; and Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 217.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab CHARLTON [MARSHALL]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Presumably an outlier of Pimperne in 1086; it was later a detached part of Cogdean Hu
ndred, though locally in Combsditch Hundred. Charlton Marshall, like Sturminster Marshall, belonged after 1086 to the Count of Meulan who in 1099 gave the tithes and church of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cerlentone }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Posteberies }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Spetisbury] for the souls}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 of King William and Queen Matilda: Round, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Documents}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  France}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 111 no. 326, and p. 118 no. 352.}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Charlton Marshall will have included a part of Spetisbury and of 'Great Crawford'. The}{\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 Abbot of Pr\'e9aux (DOR 28 Roger note) holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Sp'ttebury }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cherleton }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 184b, and in}{\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 44, he holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Crauford }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Loosebarrow Hundred, the successor to Charborough Hundred; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iv.}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (Edward I) no. 34; Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iv. p. lxxvii.}{\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab THIS MANOR. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hooc M'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 a scribal error for }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hoc M'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 . On this occasion Farley
}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 did not correct the scribe's mistake, as he did at 9,1 and 37,4.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab HALF OF ONE NIGHTS REVENUE. The other half of the one night's revenue may}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 have been provided by the group of manors in 1,6. See 1,2 revenue note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab THIS MANOR WITH ITS DEPENDENCIES PAYS ... . The corresponding entry in Exon has 'These manors with their dependencies and customary dues pay ...'. See 1,2 Burton note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 1,6\tab [Exon 28a1]
\par \tab THESE MANORS appear (with the exception of Knowlton; see1,3 manors note) to lie in the south-east of the county.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab WINFRITH [NEWBURGH]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Held by John }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Novo Burgo }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Newburgh] in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 9; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 425. The holding seems to have included }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Knysteton }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Buriton }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
[East Knighton, SY8185, and Burton, SY8386, both in Winfrith parish]: }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 10; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 89.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab LULWORTH. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 It certainly included East Lulworth, held as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Est Loleworth }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 29, by John }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Novo Burgo}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; see 26,50 Lulworth note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab `WINTERBORNE'.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\insrsid9113064 Domesday }{\i\insrsid9113064 Wintreborne}{\insrsid9113064 . It was left unidentified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 
, iii. p. 65 no. 6, but identified as a place lying on the eastern River Winterborne by }{\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{\insrsid9113064 . }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The grouping of manors suggests a
 place on the eastern River Winterborne. Winterborne Zelston, whose 1086 hundred is unknown, but which later formed (with West Morden tithing) the hundred of Rushmore, is possible, especially since, like many royal manors, it is later held by the honour o
f Gloucester (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Winterborn' Maureward'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 :}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 750; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 25; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 68; Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 336; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dorset Survey}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 pp. 97, 100). Convincing evidence is lacking and the descent of Winterborne Kingston also requires further study.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab The next Exon entry contains the details of a part of Winfrith held by Bolla the priest (see 24,2 and DOR 24 almsmen note), followed by another part of 'Winterborne' (presumably the same place), held as reeveland 
by Aiulf the sheriff. This latter entry does not appear in Domesday (see DOR 49 Aiulf note); although it rightly belongs in DOR 1, this brief entry was probably missed by the main scribe of Great Domesday when excerpting, because it was amongst almslands.
}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab KNOWLTON. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Only a few houses now remain, but the medieval village has left impressive mounds; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Royal Commission on Historical Monuments }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ), v. p. 113. It is held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 750, from the honour of Gloucester; see also }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 91.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab AS WIDE. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ta'ntd' lat'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Farley omitted the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 a }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
ta'ntd' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in error. The abbreviation sign over the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 a }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is not needed, as no letter is omitted [although the word }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 tantundem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 is shortened in the middle]; the scribe probably added it by mistake at the same time as the one over the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 n }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 t'ntd' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 later in the line.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab AS MUCH WOODLAND IN LENGTH AND WIDTH. The Latin is ambiguous and could mean either that the woodland measured the same in length and width (compare the phrase 'woodland, 7 furlongs in b
oth length and width' at 47,9) or that it measured the same as the pasture (although here one would expect }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 totidem }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 'as many [leagues]' to be used in place of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 tantundem }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 and compare }{\i\f820\cf1\insrsid9113064 pastur\'ea similiter }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in 19,2). However, Exon shows that in fact both meanings are correct in this case, the woodland, like the pasture, measuring 3 leagues by 3 leagues.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab THIS MANOR ... PAYS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'These manors ... pay'. See 1,2 Burton note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 LIST 3\tab 
EARL HAROLD. Son of Earl Godwin and brother of Queen Edith; King of England from 6th January to 14th October 1066. William the Conqueror did not recognize his title to the crown, hence the persistent use in Domesday of 'Earl' instead of 'King'. Harold was
 Earl of East Anglia (1045), received half of Swein's earldom (1046), was Earl of the West Saxons on his father's death in 1053, and Earl of Hereford (1058).}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 1,7\tab [Exon 25a1]
\par \tab [CHILD] OKEFORD. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The place can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Retur
n for Farrington Hundred whereas Okeford Fitzpaine is in that for 'Hundesburge'; see 8,2 Okeford note, A third 'Okeford' is now Shillingstone; see 54,6 Shillingstone note. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Child Acford }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
in Gillingham and Redlane Hundred, into which Farrington Hundred was absorbed, is held by the Countess }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Albamara }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 22; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 91, 753.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab OF WHICH. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 De ea }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('of it'), referring to }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 terra }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('land'); see 55,1; not }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 car}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ucas}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('ploughs').}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 8 SMALLHOLDERS. The corresponding entry in Exon has '9 smallholders'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 2 MILLS WHICH PAY 20s. The corresponding entry in Exon has '... of which the king has half the value (}{\i\f827\cf1\insrsid9113064 medietat\'e7 p}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 re}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 tii}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Ellis misprinted }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 p'tu }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 for }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 p'tii}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , which led }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 22, to put }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 'medietatem partu }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (sic)'; that is 10s, the Count of Mortain having the other 10s from the 2 mills there (see 26,4 and 26,4 Okeford note).}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab PASTURE, 2 FURLONGS. The same phrase occurs in Exon; see 1,1 furlongs note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Valet }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 valebat}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  valuit}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
past tenses) normally means the sums due to lords
 from their lands (for example, 'Value to him of this castle ...' in HEF 24,13; 'Value to Gerald ...' in DEV 45,3; where 'him' and 'Gerald' are the 1086 holders). Compare 'Value of the bishop's lordship' in 2,2. Exon frequently has 'value when he (1086 ho
lder) acquired it' for Domesday's plain past tense (but see 28,2 and 47,7).
\par \tab \tab The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Value of this manor \'a310 a year and when Fulcred acquired it at a revenue from the king (that is, 'farmed' it; see 1,9 value note) it paid as much'. In the Exon manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ual& }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 with }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 reddit }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 interlined above. In this case the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ual& }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
is not underlined for deletion or erased, but it is in many others (for example, for 11,1-2;4;7 etc.) where the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 reddit }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
written in a darker ink by a different scribe.
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 reddit}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 reddidit }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('pays, paid') would seem to have a similar meaning to }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 valet
}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  (see 1,19, and also 17,1-2 and 26,29 where both occur together). In fact in Somerset and Devon }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 valet }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 reddit }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
appear interchangeable in Domesday and Exon, so it may be that there was no real difference between the two words; see SOM \{Introduction: Exon Extra Information and Discrepancies\}. However, there is a belief that when }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 reddit }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 is used it means that the manor is being 'farmed' (see Hoyt, 'Farm of the Manor'; Lennard, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Rural England}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 105-41); and that Exon's frequent interlineations of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
reddit }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 above }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 valet }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and vice versa, sometimes in correction, are intended to draw the distinction between the two terms (but see the reservation of Lennard, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Rural England}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 123).
\par \tab \tab For evidence that Domesday's simple }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 valet }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
sometimes concealed the fact that a manor was being held at a revenue (was being 'farmed') either by an individual not resident on the estate or by the villagers themselves, see Hoyt, 'Farm of the Manor', and Lennard, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Rural England
}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 105-41. See also 47,7 hides note, 47,7 man-at-arms note, DEV 25,28 pays note and DEV 26,1 value note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 1,8\tab [Exon 25a2]
\par \tab PUDDLETOWN.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  In Puddletown Hundred according to an analysis of the Tax Returns. Two-thirds of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pideleton' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 are held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 91, by the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Comes de Insula }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (de Lisle), a frequent later holder of land in DOR 1; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 15; and 26,21 'Piddle' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab TAX FOR \'bd HIDE. This would appear to be an example of beneficial hidation, consider\-ing the number of plough-teams, the population and the value of the manor.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 29 COTTAGERS. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 coscet }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (singular), }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 coscez}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  cozets }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (plural), indeclinable; (Exon }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 cocetus }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (singular), }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 cotseti}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  coceti }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (plural), second declension). These forms represent Angl
o-Norman versions of Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 cot-seta }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (singular), }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 cotsetan }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (plural), 'a cottage-dweller'; 'cottage holder' (Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 cot}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  saeta}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 English Place-name Elements}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 under }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 cot-saeta}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Oxford English Dictionary}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , under }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 cotset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ):}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
the Anglo-Norman letter }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 z }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 represents the sound }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ts }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and the spelling }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 sc }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 a miscopied }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 st }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 representing metathesis of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ts}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 so }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 coscet }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 = }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 cotset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}
{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  coscez }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 cozets }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 = }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 cotsets}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 . The plural in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 -s }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 represented by }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 cozets }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (= }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 cotsets}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is the result of either a French adaptation or an Old English change
 of inflexion, and is the form used in WIL 1,1-15.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab 'Cottagers' are almost entirely confined to the south-west counties in Domesday, Wiltshire providing about 80% of the total entries. In Dorset there are 209 Cottagers on some 30 manors, ranging in number
 from 29 here and 20 at Melbury Abbas (19,6) to single Cottagers at Watercombe (1,29), Loders (26,58) etc. Unlike in Domesday Somerset where, with one exception, they occur on the eastern side of the county, in Dorset they are recorded for manors througho
ut. They are normally listed after the villagers (but see 3,9. 26,15) and in 31,2 they appear before cottagers (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 cotarii}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
who were apparently a different class, though the distinction is obscure. In Domesday Wiltshire, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 coscez }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 cotarii }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 regularly occur in t
he same entry, suggesting that they were not identical. The }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 bordarii }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('smallholders'; see 1,1 smallholders note) also had aspects in common with the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 coscez}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 It is interesting that in the Domesday satellite Bath A (see SOM \{Appendix: Two Texts from a Bath Cartulary\}) }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 coceti }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
are replaced in the corresponding Exon and Domesday entries by }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 bordarii}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See Lennard, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Rural England}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, pp. 346, 353-54; Lennard, 'Bordars and Cottars'.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab Not much is known about the status and economic position of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 coscez}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
though as can be seen from this entry and many others they shared ploughs with other 'villagers' and 7 Cottagers in 26,31 had \'bd
 plough on their own, but in 3,9 the 6 Cottagers are excluded from a share in the 4 ploughs. They also had some land, as can be s
een from the corresponding entries in the surviving portion of Exon, such as for 1,28 and 47,8, and shared land with other 'villagers' in 11,11-13. 12,12 and 13,2. A class of person called in Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 cotsetla }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('cottage-dweller'), which seems equivalent to that of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 coscet}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 has its obligations detailed in the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Rectitudines Singularum Personarum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 which dates from the tenth or eleventh century}{\insrsid9113064 ; see Liebermann, }{\i\insrsid9113064 Die Gesetze der Angelsachsen}{\insrsid9113064 , I.}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 pp. 445-46. His rights varied according to local custom: in som
e places he had to work for his lord every Monday throughout the year or (so the Anglo-Saxon version; 'and' in the Latin) 3 days a week at harvest; in some places every day at harvest, reaping 1 acre of oats or \'bd
 acre of other corn (that is, cereal crops);
 he was to be allowed his sheaf by the steward; he was not to pay land-tax; he was to have 5 acres of his own, more where customary, but less would be too little because his duty-labour was frequently called for; he was to pay his hearth-penny at Holy Thu
rsday like every free man, to relieve his lord's demesne, if required, of its obligations to sea-defences, royal deer parks and such things, according to his condition, and pay his church-dues at Martinmas.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WOODLAND. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'woodland, 1 league and 8 furlongs in length and 1 league in width; in another place woodland, 2 furlongs in length and as much in width'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab `PURBECK'.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Purbeck is the name of the hill which crosses the Isle of Purbeck from west to east, Purbeck Hills on Ordn
ance Survey six-inch map, Purbeck Hill on Ordnance Survey one-inch first edition of 1811 (sheet 16, reprint sheet 93 of 1969), in Steeple and Tyneham parishes. The reference here could be to a lost settlement name derived from the hill; but it is more lik
ely that 'Hundred' has been omitted, Purbeck Hundred being an alternative name for the Tax Return hundred of Ailwood, later Rowbarrow Hundred; see 37,13; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, i. p. 2. The Tax Return for Ailwood Hundred records 1 \'bd hides of Harold's land held by the villagers, from which the king had no tax; they are probably this land, which was}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 possibly at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Lesseton' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Leeson in Langton Matravers parish, SZ0078] held from the}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 honour of Gloucester in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 750; but see Hutchins, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 633.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab MAPPOWDER.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Mapertone}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 identified by }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, iii. p. 66 no. 8, tentatively with Mapperton in Almer}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and by }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  with Mapperton near Beaminster. The Domesday form may be a confusion between}{
\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Mapperton and Mappowder both of which have the same origin: Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 mapuldor }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('mapletree').}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Elsewhere in Domesday Mappowder is }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Mapledre}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 In this instance Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 tun }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 seems to have been}{\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 attached. More decisive evidence is the Tax Return for Buckland [Newton] Hundred where}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 the king is said to have \'bd hide of Harold's land in lordship. Mappowder was also in Buckland}{
\insrsid9113064  [Newton] }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred later.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab LAND FOR 1 \'bd PLOUGHS. The rest of the line in the manuscript has been left blank after this,}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 either for more details to be added or because the scribe wanted a gap before the separate}{
\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 information about the third penny. Compare the space after the woodland details in 3,1 and}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 after the mill in 3,9.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par \tab \tab }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 In the corresponding entry in Exon 1 plough can plough the 1 \'bd hides in 'Purbeck' and \'bd plough can plough the \'bd hide in Mappowder.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab THIRD PENNY OF THE WHOLE SHIRE OF DORSET. This is the third penny of the pleas of the county, as in}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
WAR 1,6 (see WAR 1,6 penny note), to which Earl Harold had been entitled as holder of the manor.}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 This and the third penny of a hundred (see SHR 4,1,1 and HEF 19,2 and}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
HEF 19,2 penny note) are not to be confused with the third penny of a borough's total revenues (see GLS B1 penny note).}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab For 'shire', the corresponding entry in Exon has 'county' (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 comitatu}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ).}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab AIULF [* THE CHAMBERLAIN *]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Probably Aiulf the sheriff, also known as Aiulf the chamberlain (DOR 49 Aiulf note), who would have had the 'farming' of this manor as}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
well as of Frome St Quintin 1,15 (see 1,15 value note). The name represents Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 \'c6thelwulf}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 1,9\tab [Exon 25b2]
\par \tab CHARBOROUGH. In the manuscript the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 R }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 E }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 CEREBERIE }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 have been written over an erasure and the }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 R }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 has a long tail to link it to the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 E}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Charborough Hundred, subsequently renamed Loosebarrow Hundred; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 88; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 44.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 1 PLOUGH THERE. The corresponding entry in Exon has '1 \'bd ploughs'. The }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 & dim' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
is interlined, in the same colour ink and probably by the same scribe as the rest of the entry; this was perhaps the reason for its omission in Domesday.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VILLAGERS ... 1 \'bd HIDES. According to an analysis of the Tax Return for Charborough Hundred the king did not have tax from 1 \'bd hides of Haold's land held by the villagers.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Value when he acquired it'; the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ille}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  perhaps refers to Fulcred who acquired the manor immediately preceding this one in Exon (= DOR
 1,14). Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 recepit }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
('acquired') may mean 'acquired at a revenue', that is, he 'farmed' the land: it seems likely that Fulcred is the same man as the one who acquired Child Okeford at a revenue (1,7; see 1,7 value note). However, Exon regularly, especial
ly for Devon, has 'value when he (the 1086 holder) acquired it' for Domesday's plain 'value was' or when no past value is given in Domesday; see 11,8 value note and compare 1,18 value note and 47,7 acquired note. Lennard, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Rural England}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 148, agrees that the subject of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 recepit }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
does not necessarily 'farm' the manor and that there is doubt as to whether Fulcred, who may have been a sheriff at some stage, did 'farm' all the manors in Dorset that Exon says he 'acquired', but that he may have had charge of the
m and let out the 'farming' to someone else. With the exception of 56,39, Domesday Dorset does not mention the practice of 'farming', whereby a }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 firmarius }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
acquired at a fixed rent a manor from the lord (or perhaps the sheriff; see GLS 1,62). Many Domesday c
ounties refer to land being 'held at a revenue', for example, HEF 1,75, GLS 1,36, CAM 1,18; see also 1,7 value note; 1,13 value note and 11,7 Woodsford note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 1,10\tab [Exon 25b3]
\par \tab IBBERTON. The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Hilton Hundred (later renamed Whiteway Hundred). It is held by the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Comes de Insula }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hedbredinton' }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 90; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Ethbrichinton }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 13.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Value when Fulcred acquired it'. Similarly for the past values of 1,11-12;14.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 1,11\tab [Exon 26a2]
\par \tab FLEET. The Tax Return for 'Uggescombe' Hundred states that Fulcred (see 1,10 value note) paid tax in another hundred on 1 \'bd hides of Harold's land. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 93, Hawisia }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Ripariis }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (Rivers) holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Flete }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in 'Uggescombe' Hundred from the Earl of Devon; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 426; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 6.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 1,10 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 1,12\tab [Exon 26b1]
\par \tab CHALDON.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Chaldon Herring or East Chaldon, distinct from the holding at 55,33; see Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 339. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Chavedon' Hareng }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 is a fee of the Earl of Warwick in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 425. An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in Winfrith Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 1,10 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 1,13\tab [Exon 26b2]
\par \tab LODERS.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Possibly an old river name, referring in Domesday to a number of settlements on its banks, such as Loders itself, Up Loders and Loders Lutton, now Matravers, all within the modern parish of Loders; see F\'e4gersten, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 257. Of these Loders and Matravers can be confidently identified with individual Domesday holdings and Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dorset Survey}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, pp. 127-28, would go further. The king's land here has its own Tax Return. Other holdings seem to have fallen into two Tax Return hundreds, Eggardon and 'Goderthorn'; see 26,41 Loders note, 26,58 Loders note, 55,24 Loders note and 56,51 Loders note. In 
}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 92, the Abbey of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Monteburc }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Montebourg] holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Lodres }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 by gift of Richard }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
de Revers}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The same land in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 11, in 'Goderthorn' Hundred includes }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bothenamtone }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Bothenhampton, SY4791] and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pymor }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Pymore, SY4694, in Allington and Bradpole parishes].}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VILLAGERS ... 10 HIDES. According to an analysis of the Tax Return for Loders Hundred the king has not had tax from 10 hides which the villagers hold from Earl Harold's land.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS AND IS \'a333. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'It pays \'a334 and when Roger acquired it at a revenue it paid as much'. In the Exon manuscript the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 xxx }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
is at the end of a line and the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 iiii }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 at the beginning of the next and the first }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 i }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
is slightly apart from the others and rather smudged, so easily missed by the main scribe of Great Domesday.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 2 HIDES [OF] THANELAND WHICH DO
 NOT BELONG THERE. These 2 hides are also entered in the Tax Return for Loders Hundred: they were added to the manor and the king did not have tax from them. Compare HEF 1,75. Generally thaneland was part of the lordship land (see SOM 8,16) of either a la
y
 or an ecclesiastical landholder, set aside to maintain a thane, armed and mounted. In return for the land the thane would provide certain services, often military. This land, especially if it was part of the church's land, was usually inalienable: the ho
l
der was not free to transfer his allegiance to another lord nor to sell the land (see 49,10;17 and 11,2 Puddle note and 11,13 man-at-arms note; but compare 1,31). Thaneland was not automatically hereditable, though it could sometimes be granted for a peri
o
d of 'three lives' (a common length of lease). The holder of thaneland was not necessarily a thane, however; see 1,31 where he is a priest and 11,13 where in Exon (11,13 man-at-arms note) he is a French man-at-arms. From several entries, this one included
, it would seem that thaneland was often simply land once held by a thane.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 1,14\tab [Exon 25b1]}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab LITTLE PUDDLE. The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Puddletown Hundred; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 425; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 15, 34, 54; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. (Edward I) no. 689, where }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Litele Pydele }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is held from Stephen }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Baiocis }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ( on whom, see 1,22 'Wey' note).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab EARL HAROLD'S MOTHER. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Countess Gytha, wife of Earl Godwin.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab IT PAID TAX. Or perhaps 'she paid tax' here and elsewhere with}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  geldb'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 However, see 1,7-13 etc., where the subject of }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 geldb' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 must be the manor; also 57,4 where }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 q' geldb' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 must refer to the lands of the thanes. See 26,43 paid note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE. See 1,10 value note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 LIST 4\tab QUEEN MATILDA. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wife of King William; she died in 1083.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\insrsid1786625 \tab \tab }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Exon has 'Land of Queen Matilda in Dorset' heading the entries for 1,15-21.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 1,15\tab [Exon 29a1]
\par \tab FROME [ST QUINTIN]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Litelfrome}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 This holding can be deduced from an analysis of the Tax}{\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 Return for 'Modbury' Hundred. It was later in Tollerford Hundred, held from}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 the Earl of Gloucester; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 426, 750; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 35, 55; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i.}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (Henry III) no. 530, and iii. (Edward I) no. 371.}{
\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab SMALLHOLDERS. The corresponding entry in Exon adds '8 cottagers' after the smallholders. 'Cottagers' (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 cotarii}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 were}{\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 often excluded by the main scribe of Great Domesday for some reason: apart from the 5 cottagers for 11,5 and the 2 cottagers}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 for 36,6, there are some 4
6 cottagers in Somerset and 17 cottagers in Devon who appear in Exon, but not}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Domesday.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS \'a312. The main scribe of Great Domesday originally wrote }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .xiiii. lib' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 for the past value,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 then erased the first two minims}{
\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (although they are still visible in the Ordnance Survey facsimile) to make }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .xii.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Value when Aiulf acquired it'; probably Aiulf the sheriff (see 1,21 value note).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab NOW \'a318. The main scribe of Great Domesday originally wrote }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .xii. lib'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , then corrected the number to }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .xviii. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 by joining the }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ii}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 together, adding a }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 i}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  after them and interlining }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ii }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 above. All these corrections to the value}{
\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 were done in a much darker ink.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab BRICTRIC [* SON OF ALGAR *]. See 1,17 Brictric note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 1,16\tab [Exon 29a2]
\par \tab CRANBORNE. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 In 'Alvredesberge' Hundred, according to the evidence of the Tax Return; later in Cranborne Hundred, held by the Earl of Gloucester: }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 26, 39.}{
\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab PASTURE 2 LEAGUES LONG AND 1 FURLONG AND 1 LEAGUE WIDE. Or perhaps, as one would expect the league to precede its subdivision the furlong (as in 4,1. 13,1 etc.), the scribe omitted the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 una q' }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 before the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 lg' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and the meaning should be 'pasture 2 leagues and 1 furlong 
long and 1 league wide'. See 5,1 woodland note for another case where the scribe may have added part of a length measurement. The corresponding entry in Exon, however, also gives the width as}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
'1 furlong and 1 league', but gives the length as 2 \'bd leagues.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WOODLAND 2 LEAGUES LONG. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'woodland 2 \'bd leagues long'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS \'a324. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'This manor paid \'a324 while the queen was alive'. Similarly for the \'a315 past value of 1,17. She died in 1083.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab THREE THANES ... THEY PAY \'a33 ... . }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Three thanes held and still hold 3 hides of these 10 hides from Brictric; they could not}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
be separated from him. Each of them pays 20s a year apart from service'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab APART FROM SERVICE. Both Domesday and Exon have }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 excepto seruitio }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 which is ambiguous. The meaning could be either that the thanes owed service as well as \'a33, or that the \'a3
3 was instead of doing service. However, the Exon addition to 11,1 (see 11,1 Brictwin's note) suggests that the \'a33 was paid to exempt the thanes from doing service, in other words the service was commuted to a render. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset
}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 67, translates 'render \'a33 excepting service'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab BRICTRIC [* SON OF ALGAR *]. See 1,17 Brictric note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 1,17\tab [Exon 29b1]
\par \tab ASHMORE ... 4 HIDES. According to the Tax Return for 'Langeburgh' Hundred the king had no tax from 4 hides of the queen's land. Ashmore is later in Cranborne Hundred and held from the Earl of Gloucester: }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 750; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 26, 39, 46.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab BRICTRIC [* SON OF ALGAR *].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 Almost certainly Brictric son of Algar, a great English thane who had held much land in the west. Most of his lands passed to Queen Matilda before going to the king on her death in 1083. A romantic tale told by the Continu
ator of Wace and others (quoted in Freeman, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of the Norman Conquest}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, iv. Appendix, Note O) alleges that Matilda had seized his lands because in youth he had spurned her hand. See also 10,2 Brictric note.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par \tab \tab The bulk of his lands were in Gloucestershi
re, where he held the massive manor of Tewkesbury. Much of his land was subsequently granted to Queen Matilda and this link allows many of his other holdings in Cornwall, Devon, Dorset and Wiltshire to be identified. His estate has been carefully reconstr
u
cted by Ann Williams whose detailed and persuasive arguments need not be repeated here: Williams, 'A West-Country Magnate of the Eleventh Century', pp. 41-68. Dr Williams has also suggested that Brictric was the unnamed lord of the pre-Conquest holders of
 the manors acquired by Walter and Gotshelm of Claville in Devon (fiefs 24-25). See also Clarke, }{\i\insrsid9113064 English Nobility}{\insrsid9113064 
, pp. 260-62, who excludes these and also the Brictric holdings on fiefs 24, 40, 42 and 50 from his list; he identifies the predecessor of Odo son of Gamalin as another Brictric (}{\i\insrsid9113064 ibidem}{\insrsid9113064 
, p. 265). Dr Williams, however, has shown that complex interrelationships between these and other fiefs make it probable that all had been held by the son of Algar (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 1,18\tab [Exon 29b2]
\par \tab EDMONDSHAM.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Medesham}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; for the}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 spelling, see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 217. The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Alvredesberge' Hundred; it was later in Cranborne Hundred; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 27, 39, 46.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab DODA [* THE MONK *]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Probably the same Doda who was the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 T.R.E.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  holder of another part of Edmondsham (50,1).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab HELD IT BEFORE 1066. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The corresponding entry in Exon adds '... and he could go with his land to whichever lord he would'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab TAX FOR 2 HIDES ... 1 HIDE ... IN LORDSHIP. T
here is no mention in the corresponding Exon entry of any land (or ploughs) held by the smallholders. Similarly for 47,4 and 55,25. This omission of the villagers' land holding, when the lordship land is nevertheless given, is very common for some reason 
in the Exon sections relating to Devon. The reason may have been lack of information for the villagers' holding or lack of a holding altogether or scribal error (the last being less likely because of the regularity of the omission). See 1,19 tax note.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 
VALUE. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Value 60s a year; value when Ascelin acquired it, as many [shillings]; he held this manor from the queen'. This may mean that Ascelin 'farmed' the land for the queen (an Ascelin held Foddington in Somerset at a 
revenue from the king; see SOM 45,15 value note), though in the Tax Return for 'Alvredesberge' Hundred Ascelin holds 1 hide in lordship, which, with the evidence of 1,20 and 56,19, suggests that he was simply a sub\-
tenant of the queen. However, it is possible that Ascelin was both a subtenant and a 'farmer' (so Lennard, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Rural England}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 125 note 2). See 1,9 value note on 'farming'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 1,19\tab [Exon 30a1]
\par \tab HAMPRESTON.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hame}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 224. The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Canedone' Hundred where the king has had no tax from 2 hides and 1 virgate which a thane holds at a revenue from him.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The corresponding entry in Exon has '... which William Bellett held from the queen and Saul held it befor
e1066 and he could go with his land to whichever lord he would'. The Latin does not make it clear whether the 'he' is William Bellett or Saul.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab TAX FOR 2 HIDES AND 1 VIRGATE. The details given for the lordship and villagers' land total 1 hide, 3 virgate
s and 6 acres. Other examples in Dorset of the total hidage details not agreeing with the tax include 11,16. 15,1. 36,5. 47,4(?)-5. 55,11;16;40. The details can only be checked against the tax total in the Dorset entries for which Exon survives, as the vi
l
lagers' land holding is not given in Domesday for this county, and only where Exon gives both lordship and villagers' land (see 1,18 tax note). There are a large number of manors in Exon for Dorset for which no detail of villagers' and lordship land and p
loughs is given.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab LAND FOR 2 PLOUGHS. For the corresponding entry in Exon Ellis printed }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 potest arare ii d,icar'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 In the Exon manuscript the }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  is below}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 di }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (perhaps the beginning of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 dimidia}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 making the land ploughable by 2 \'bd ploughs) and is}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 probably a deletion mark.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 1 HIDE ... LORDSHIP. The corresponding entry in Exon has '1 \'bd hides, less 6 acres, in lordship'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 5 VILLAGERS. The corresponding entry in Exon has '2 villagers'. In the Exon manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 iii }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 iiii }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 was originally written and the last}{
\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 i}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , or }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ii}{\scaps\cf1\insrsid9113064 , }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 erased and an attempt possibly made to join the remaining }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ii }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
together to form a }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 v}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The villagers, smallholders and slaves are interlined.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 1,20\tab [Exon 30a2]
\par \tab WITCHAMPTON. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 This holding and that at 26,40 can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Badbury Hundred. Witchampton was later in Cranborne Hundred, where the land formed part of the honour of Gloucester: }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 750; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 26, 39, 45.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab TWO THANES ... 1066. The corresponding entry in Exon adds '... and they could go with their land to whichever lord they would'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 2 PARTS OF 1 HIDE. Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 pars }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (genitive: }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 partis}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
is ambiguous, the fraction of the whole varying; see 1,31 'the third pa
rt of 1 hide'; 47,10 'the fourth part of 1 virgate'; NTH 18,54 'the fifth part of 1 hide'. In this case, however, the parts of the hide, and of the virgate in lordship, must be thirds or the details of the lordship and villagers' land would not add up to 
the taxed hidage, which they generally do (see 1,19 tax note, however).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 5 VILLAGERS. So the Exon manuscript; Ellis misprinted }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 vi}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Value before when Ascelin acquired it, as much [100s]. He held it from the queen and never paid tax to the king on the 2 parts of 1 hide which we have mentioned above (}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 nominauimus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ) in this manor'. This is a rare occurrence of the first person in Exon; see also SOM 36,7 hide note, SOM 40,2 hides note and DEV 23,5 land note. Althou
gh the scribe of the two Somerset entries was the same, a different scribe wrote each of the Dorset and Devon entries.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab Ellis misprinted }{\i\cf1\up6\insrsid9113064 &}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,icelin' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 for the Exon manuscript }{\i\cf1\up6\insrsid9113064 \'e6}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,scelin}{\i\cf1\up6\insrsid9113064 9}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (for }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 aescelinus }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 etscelinus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 :}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Old German }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Azelin
}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , }{\insrsid9113064 Old French }{\i\insrsid9113064 Ascelin}{\insrsid9113064 ; see Forssner, }{\i\insrsid9113064 Continental-Germanic Personal Names in England}{\insrsid9113064 , pp. 38-39}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
). The Tax Return for Badbury Hundred also mentions the fact that the king has had no tax from the 2 parts of 1 hide which Ascelin (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Eschelin'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 holds.}{
\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 1,21\tab [Exon 30b1]
\par \tab WIMBORNE [MINSTER]. D}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 omesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Winburne}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; it can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Badbury Hundred; see 1,3 Wimborne note.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab The corresponding entry in Exon has 'The king has 1 manor which is attached to (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 adiacet}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wimborne'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ODO [!1! THE TREASURER !1!].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Odo }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 thesaurari}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 us}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ] in the corresponding entry in Exon.}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 He seems to have given his name to 'Odenham', a lost part of Wimborne Minster; see 7,1 'Odenham' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab IN LORDSHIP. In the corresponding entry in Exon}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  in dominio }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is omitted, perhaps in error.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WOODLAND. In the corresponding entry in Exon the woodland is not written in its usual place before the meadow, but after the value}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 statement: 'To this manor belongs woodland ...'.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Value when the sheriff acquired it'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab DOES NOT BELONG TO THE REVENUE OF ... . The corresponding entry in Exon has 'does not belong at all to the night's}{\insrsid9113064  r}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
evenue of ...'. See 1,3 for the payment of one night's revenue by the Wimborne Minster}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 group of manors.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 LIST 5\tab HUGH SON OF GRIP ... QUEEN. Exon has 'Lands which men-at-arms held from the Queen in Dorset' heading the entries corresponding to 1,22-29. All the eight manors, however, were held by plain Hugh (no doubt Hugh son of Grip).
}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 1,22\tab [Exon 31a1]
\par \tab `WEY'.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  The holding can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Cullifordtree Hundred. The various Domesday lands named from the River Wey cannot all be identified with certainty, see \{
Introduction: Places Named from Rivers\}. This land appears to have been at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Waye Bause }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (derived from Stephen }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Baiocis}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 a representative of a family which came from Bayeux in Normandy), held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 18-19, by Peter }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Rabeyne}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 the same man who then held 1,14. The same land later appears (in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 57) as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Upweye }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Upwey]; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. (Edward I) no. 689; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, i. pp. 199, 245-46; and also 26,14 'Wey' note and 55,5 'Wey' note. If the present 'Wey' encompassed part or all of Weymouth, then it may have 
included Melcombe Regis in that parish which was royal land (see 1,1 Portland note), although part seems to have belonged to Cerne Abbey in 1086, being surveyed as part of Radipole (11,3); see Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 448.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Now the king holds this land in lordship'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 1,23\tab [Exon 31a2]
\par \tab LANGTON [HERRING]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The royal land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Uggescombe' Hundred. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Langetun }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in 'Uggescombe' Hundred is held from the 
Earl of Gloucester by Hugh }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Poynz }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and from him by Philip }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Harang }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 6. Another part of the village is held by the wife of Hugh; see 55,31 Langton note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ALWARD [!1! COLLING !1!].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Alwar}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 d[}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 us}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  colin}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 us}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ] in the corresponding entry in Exon; a}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
man of the same name is a 1086 holder of land in Domesday Wiltshire (WIL 67,14) and see 56,15 Thornicombe note. On the form Alward, see 3,1 Alward note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 8 SMALLHOLDERS; 1 WHO PAYS 30d. It is not clear from the Latin whether or not the 1 smallholder is s
eparate from the 8. Exon has '7 smallholders' with 'and 1 smallholder who pays 30d a year' interlined with no omission sign (by the same scribe as the rest of the entry and in the same colour ink, so obviously not a later addition). The fact that the main
 scribe of Great Domesday corrected }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 vii. bord' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 to }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 vii.i }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 by interlining }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 i}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, perhaps as a result of a closer look at the Exon during checking, suggests that there were 8 smallholders altogether, 1 of whom paid 30d.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 1,24\tab [Exon 31a3]
\par \tab `TARRANT'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 . See \{Introduction: Places Named from Rivers\}
. Both the 'Tarrant' here and the one at 1,26 can be located by an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Langeburgh' Hundred and the order of entries suggests that the 'Tarrant' at 1,25 was}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
there as well. These places called 'Tarrant' may have been Tarrant Gunville (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Tarente Gundevil'}{\i\cf1\up6\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Gundevyleston}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and Tarrant Rushton (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Tarente Petri de Russell'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Tarente Vilers}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Tarrante Russeaston}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ),}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 held from the Earl of Gloucester in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 26, 39, and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 750, in
 Cranborne Hundred (which later incorprated 'Langeburgh' Hundred); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. (Henry III) no. 530, and iii. (Edward I) no. 371.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 3 SMALLHOLDERS. In the manuscript and Farley }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 iii. bord' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 but the Ordnance Survey facsimile does not reproduce them clearly.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab PASTURE 7 FURLONGS LONG AND 2 FURLONGS WIDE. In the manuscript there is a smear of pale orange/brown paint or ink (or perhaps a water blot), probably contemporary, over }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 7}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ii. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and under the preceding words, but there is no difficulty in reading them. See 55,15 land note for a similar blot.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Value when Hugh acquired it'. Similarly for 1,26-28.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 1 VIRGATE ... AELFRIC. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Aelfric, Hugh's predecessor ...'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \'bd GOLD MARK. That is, \'a33.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 1,25\tab [Exon 31b1]
\par \tab `TARRANT'.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\insrsid9113064 Domesday }{\i\insrsid9113064 Tarente}{\insrsid9113064 . It was tentatively identified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 69 no. 25, as Tarrant Gunville and by }{
\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{\insrsid9113064  as plain 'Tarrant'. Se}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 e 1,24 'Tarrant' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 1,26\tab [Exon 32a1]
\par \tab `TARRANT'. Domesday }{\i\insrsid9113064 Tarente}{\insrsid9113064 . It was tentatively identified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 69 no. 26, as Tarrant Rushton and by }{\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{
\insrsid9113064  as plain 'Tarrant'. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 1,24 'Tarrant' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 
2 VILLAGERS AND 4 SMALLHOLDERS [***]. A gap of about seven letters' width has been left after this in the manuscript, presumably for the villagers' ploughs, which Exon also omits. A similar gap for the villagers' ploughs appears in 8,4. 11,16. 26,50 and 5
6,57. Compare 1,1 life note and 24,4 lordship note on the space left for lordship ploughs.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab THE VALUE WAS. See 1,24 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 1,27\tab [Exon 31b2]}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab "SCETRE".}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\insrsid9113064 It was identified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 69 no. 27, as Shitterton (in Bere Regis), but left unidentified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 
Domesday Gazetteer}{\insrsid9113064 . It is }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 possibly to be identified with Shitterton (or Sitterton), SY8495, in Bere Hundred; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, i. p. 276. The order of the entries at this point, however, suggests a place in 'Langeburgh'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred or 
in Pimperne Hundred where this land seems to be required to make up the holding of the queen in the Tax Return. There is a Shitley in Winterborne Houghton (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 130) which may be derived from }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Scetre}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 but Pimperne Hundred is unlikely to have stretched this far west in 1086. Sitterton, which included }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Westmauston }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ['Westmyngton', lost in Turners Puddle: }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 295], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Suthbroke }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
[Southbrook, SY8494] and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Fulcume }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [now a field name; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 281] may have been counted as part of Bere Regis (1,2) in 1086; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 42.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab THE VALUE WAS. See 1,24 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 1,28\tab [Exon 31b3]
\par \tab NUTFORD. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in Pimperne Hundred. The name is now represented by two places, less than a mile from each other, Nutford in Pimperne parish and France Farm, earlier Nutford Lockey in Stourpaine parish. Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dorset Survey}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
pp. 137-38, identifies the second Domesday holding (57,12) with France farm, so called from the holding there of the Norman Abbey of Fontevrault. But from Round, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Documents}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 France}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 385 no. 1085, it is clear that the gift by Robert. Earl of Leicester, of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Nutford}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Pimpre }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Pimperne: 1,5] and }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Beneford }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Blandford: 1,5 Pimperne note] must have been out of royal land. Thus 1,28 is France farm.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 2 \'bd HIDES. The corresponding entry in Exon has '... of these the king has in lordship 2 \'bd hides and 1 plough, less 8 acres which}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 2 Cottagers hold'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 3 COTTAGERS. The corresponding entry in Exon has '2 Cottagers (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 duo coceti}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
hold the 8 acres (see 1,28 hides note), but immediately after this in the account of the people and resources: 'The king has 3 Cottagers' (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ii }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 with }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 i }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
interlined). The Exon scribe may have omitted to correct the first number because it was written in full father than in the more usual figures.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab THE VALUE WAS. See 1,24 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 1,29\tab [Exon 31b4]
\par \tab WATERCOMBE. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Chilbury Hundred, part of the later hundred of Winfrith.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \'bd MILL. The \'bd mill at 4s complements that at Ringstead (52,2) which lay to the south.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab PASTURE ... 1 FURLONG [WIDE]. The main scribe of Great Domesday omitted }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 lat' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('wide') in error; it has been supplied from Exon.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab THE HOLDERS ... COULD GO TO WHICH LORD THEY WOULD. They were free to choose any lord as their patron and protector of their la
nds. Many other lands were 'tied' to a particular manor or lord, as is seen in 2,4. 11,1 etc. Compare Exon for 47,9 (47,9 Alfrith note): 'Alfrith ... could not be separated from the king's service'.
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 In the corresponding entries in Exon this is entered for every section except for the one corresponding to 1,22.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 1,30\tab THIS ENTRY was written by the main scribe of Great Domesday in a smaller script and compressed. It would seem that he stopped after 1,29, leaving a space for the remaining land of the 
king, but this did not prove large enough for both this entry and 1,31, both of which were later additions; see 1,31 entry note. Neither of these entries appears in the surviving portion of the king's lands in Exon; perhaps, as they had been held by Count
ess Goda in 1066, they were in a}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
separate gathering from the king's lordship lands and those held by and from Queen Matilda. Or, in the case of the present entry, the problem of its wrongful removal from Shaftesbury Abbey by Earl Harold may have caused information on it to be delayed.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab MELCOMBE [HORSEY]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Now incorporating Melcombe Bingham and Binghams Melcombe, the manorial names representing grants of royal land later than Domesday. The land can be located by an analysis of the Tax Return for Hilton Hundred, later renamed Whiteway Hundred; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 90; the Red Book of the Exchequer (Hall, ii. p. 544); }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. pp. 13, 36, 40. Another Melcombe (Melcombe Regis) is probably surveyed as part of Portland or Weymouth (see 1,1 Portland note and 1,22 'Wey' note).}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab EARL HAROLD WRONGFULLY TOOK IT AWAY ... COUNTESS GODA HELD IT. Goda was the sister of King Edward (GLS 24,1) and wife first of Count Drogo of Mantes and then the first wife of Count Eustace of Boulogne; she died }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 c}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 1056. She presumab
ly bequeathed this manor to Shaftesbury Abbey and then Earl Harold seized it. He also took Cheselbourne and Stour from Shaftesbury, and although these were returned to the abbey because of the discovery of a writ of King Edward ordering it, King William k
ept Melcombe Horsey in his possession; see 19,14.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab TO WULFGAR WHITE. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wlgaro uuit}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Wlgaro }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 may be a scribal error for }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Ulwardo}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dorset Survey}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 p. 112 note 6. For Wulfward White, see 35,1 Wulfward note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab THREE FREE THANES.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Tres lib}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 er}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 i taini}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 perhaps a mistake for '3 thanes held them freely', as the thane was basically a free man (see Maitland, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Domesday Book and Beyond}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 161-66; Vinogradoff, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
English Society in the Eleventh Century}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 80-83). Unless they were thanes holding church land (f
or example, 49,10;17 and 11,1 Brictwin's note) they were usually free to choose their lord (for example, 4,1. 15,1 and see 55,34 Wulfnoth note). However, the phrase 'free thanes' does occur elsewhere in Dorset (for example, 50,3. 56,7).}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 3 \'bd VIRGATES ... IN BUCKLAND [NEWTON] HUNDRED. These seem to be the \'bd hide and \'bd
 virgate which in the Tax Return for Buckland [Newton] Hundred are said not to have paid tax and to have been taken from a thane by Robert d'Oilly and placed in the king's revenue of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Melecome }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
[Melcombe]. In Domesday the action is attributed to Countess Goda.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 In the manuscript the Latin words for 'In Buckland [Newton] Hundred' are written in capitals the same size as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 MELCOME}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 similarly lined through in red, not as Farley printed them. Compare 37,13.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 1,31\tab 
THIS ENTRY was written by the main scribe of Great Domesday right across (that is, not in columns) a small separate piece of parchment, cut off from the side of a presumably spoiled sheet which had already been ruled out, so that the or
iginal horizontal rulings are seen as vertical scores. This piece was set into a larger sheet (probably in the nineteenth century) to make it the same size as the other folios. As the entry is rubricated the addition was an early one by the scribe. A tran
s\-
position sign indicates its correct position in the chapter. The other side of the parchment (76cd) is blank. Apart from folio 81 (see 36,4-11 and DOR 42), there are only two other cases in Domesday of material being added on a separate piece of parchment
: SUR 8,23-27 (folio 33) and HAM 4 and 6,13-17 (folio 42); see SUR 8,23 entry note and HAM 4 chapter note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab HINTON [MARTELL]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The 6 hides and 1 virgate in lordship appear in the Tax Return for 'Canedone'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hyneton Martel }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Parva Hyneton }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Hinton Parva, SU0004] are held respectively from the heirs of Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Martel }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and the Countess }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
de Insula }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Badbury Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 15, representing the holdings of the honour of Chewton and of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Comes de Insula }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 425, 753. Hinton Parva in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 753, includes }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Esseton' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [now Ashton farm, SU0004]; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 149.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab PRIEST HELD 1 HIDE IN THANELAND. According to Ellis, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 General Introduction to Domesday Book}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 299, he held it in hereditary succession. See 1,13 thaneland note.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab BISHOP OF LISIEUX }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ... 1 HIDE. Gilbert Maminot. This hide duly appears in his fief as Preston (6,2).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab MEADOW, 11 ACRES. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Acras}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 accusative after }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 habet}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 as also the woodland measurements, and houses, and probably the mill. Compare 1,31 15 acres note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab WULFRIC [* THE HUNTER *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab WIMBORNE CHURCH. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The 1 \'bd hides and \'bd virgate are unnamed, but appear as 1 \'bd hides in the Tax Return for Badbury Hundred held by the Bishop of London.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab BISHOP MAURICE. Bishop of London from April 1086 to 1107.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab MEADOW, 15 ACRES. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Acras }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is in the accusative after }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 habet }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('has'). The mill and the pasture may also be the objects of }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 habet}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Compare 2,4 and 2,4 meadow note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 2\tab LAND OF THE BISHOP OF SALISBURY. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
This chapter together with that following (DOR 3 [Land of the Monks of Sherborne]) represents the lands of the former see of Sherborne. Sherborne and Ramsbury were united in 1058 and the episcopal seat was transferred to Salisbury between 1075 and 1078. 
The main scribe of Great Domesday was uncertain how to treat the resulting division of lands; thus he entered a }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 III}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 in the left-hand margin of folio 77a to indicate land held by the monks of Sherborne, but omitted a chapter head and included the value of 2
,6 in 3,1; moreover, subsequent entries in DOR 3 are held by the Bishop of Salisbury, although 'for the monks' supplies' (see List 6 manors note and 3,6 Stalbridge note on the Tax Return treatment). In other counties, for example, Worcester\-
shire and Herefordshire, such divisions are made within a single chapter. The diocese of Sherborne had originally been larger and was split under Edward the Elder }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 c}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
. 909 into three based on Sherborne, Wells and Crediton (see Stenton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Anglo-Saxon England}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 433). From th
at time Sherborne seems to have possessed 300 hides, but some lands had already been alienated early in the eleventh century according to a letter of Bishop Aethelric (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 c}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 . 1001 - }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 c}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 . 1012); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 41. There is a confirmation charter addressed to the Church by King Aethelred II (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 c}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
. 978-1016) concerning Bradford Abbas, Compton, Oborne, Stalbridge, Stalbridge Weston, Thornford and Lyme Regis (Kemble, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Codex Diplomaticus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 701 = }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Early Charters of Wessex}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 614 p. 174 = Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 895); a grant by the same king of Corscombe (Kemble, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Codex Diplomaticus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 1309 = }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Early Charters of Wessex}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 617 = Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 933); and one by King Cnut (1016-1035) of 16 }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 mansae }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 also in Corscombe (Kemble, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Codex Diplomaticus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 1322 = }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Early Charters of Wessex}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 623 = Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 975). Lyme Regis had been a grant of King Cynewulf (757-786), Bradford Abbas and Stalbridge of King Athelstan (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 c}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .
 924-939) and Oborne of King Edgar (959-975) (Birch, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cartularium Saxonicum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , nos. 224, 695-96, 1308 = }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Early Charters of Wessex}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , nos. 562, 578-79, 611 = Sawyer, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , nos. 263, 422-23, 813). King Aethelred's confirmation includes land in Stockland (see 12,14) and Halstock not separately mentioned in Domesday, also at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Wulfheardigstoke }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Osanstoke}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 both probably parts of Stoke Abbott (3,9).}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab The Bishop of Salisbury in 1086 was Osmund, who held the see from 1078 to 1099; he was also Chancellor from }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 c}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 . 1073 to }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 c}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
. 1078-1082 before Bishop Maurice of London; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 i. pp. xvi-xvii.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this chapter.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 2,1\tab THE BISHOP OF SALISURY HOLDS. The scribe omitted the abbreviation sign over }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ten}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Farley did not correct the error, as he did on several occasions (for example, 9,1. 37,4).}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab CHARMINSTER. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 This large holding in Dorchester (later St George) Hundred also included land at Stratton (SY6593) and Grimstone (SY6494): }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 94; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 100; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 17. On Wolfeton in Charminster, see 3,14 'Cerne' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab AS MUCH LAND AS 2 PLOUGHS CAN PLOUGH. That is, 2 carucates of land (see 2,6 and 2,6 carucates note), not hidated and so not paying tax. Similarly in 2,2;4-5. 8,1;3.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 2,2\tab ALTON [PANCRAS].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  The land may well have lain in "Stana" Hundred in 1086, although in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 4, 36, 41, it is in Sherborne Hundred.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 6 VILLAGERS. Originally written }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 vi. uill'o }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in the manuscript and corrected to }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 uill'os}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
the added }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 s }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 being squashed in very close to the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 7}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 . Or it is possible that it was the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 7}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  that was the addition.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE ... \'a313. Originally }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .xii. lib' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 with }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 i}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  interlined in correction; Farley did not show the small hair-line below and between the }
{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 xi }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 i }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 which was intended to indicate the position of the omitted }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 i}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 2,3\tab UP CERNE. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Held by the Bishop of Salisbury in Sherborne Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 4; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. pp. 36, 58. It may well have lain in "Stana" Hundred in 1086.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 2,4\tab YETMINSTER.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in Yetminster Hundred. It is }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Iatmynstre }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 41, where it is coupled with }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Legh }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Leigh, ST6108] and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Chateknoll }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Chetnole, ST6008]. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Rym }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Ryme Intrinseca, ST5810, so called to distinguish it from 'Ryme Extrinseca' in Long Bredy: Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iv. p. 491], held from the Bishop of Salisbury by Humphrey }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Bello Campo }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 36, 41, was also probably part of Yetminster.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab MEADOW, 12 ACRES. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Acras }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is in the accusative after }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 habet}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
; the mill should also be. The woodland is probably not, however, although it is hard to tell because the tail of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 7}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  in the line above covers where the abbreviation line over the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 a }
{\cf1\insrsid9113064 of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 silua }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 would be to make it accusative. Compare 1,31 and 1,31 11 acres note and 1,31 15 acres note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab HOLDERS ... COULD NOT BE SEPARATED. See 1,29 holders note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 2,5\tab LYME [REGIS]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 In 1316 part of the borough of Lyme [Regis] was held by the Abbot of Sherborne (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 45) in Whitchurch Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab FISHERMEN ...}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 PAY 15s TO THE MONKS FOR FISH. As no 'value' statement is given for this entry, it would appear that this clause replaces it, the fishermen's payment being for the right to fish (compare 49,13). Or it could be a commuted money payment, th
e fishermen paying 15s instead of so many fish to the monks in rent (compare the use of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ad pisces }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
in HEF 1,10a). For other instances of omitted value statements, see 12,13 salt-workers note, 47,7 man-at-arms note and 57,2 smallholders note, and compare 54,2 [Value] note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 2,6\tab SHERBORNE. The 43 hides will have included a number of villages. From }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 4-5, it is clear that apart from Sherborne itself (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Schireburn Camel}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ),}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 the bishop held }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Buryton }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Longburton, ST6412], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wotton }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 or }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wotton Episcopi }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [North Wootton, ST6514], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Caundel Episcopi }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Bishops Caundle, ST6913; see 26,70 Caundle note], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Holnest }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
[Holnest, ST6509], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Combe }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Coombe in Castleton, ST6218], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Folke }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Alveston }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
[Folk, ST6513, no doubt including Bishops Down, ST6712, and Allweston, ST6614], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pyneford }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Pinford, ST6617], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Lydelinch }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Lydlinch, ST7413; see also }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 8], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bere }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Beer Hackett, ST5911]; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Lyllington }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Lillington, ST6212], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Prinnesle }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ['Prinsley', lost in Castleton: F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 211], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Haydon }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Haddon }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Haydon, ST6715] and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Leweston }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Leweston, ST6312].}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 A place }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dewelepole}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 recorded in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. pp. 7-8, is perhaps to be associated with Poll Bridge}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 farm in Caundle Marsh (ST6812); see F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 212. Caundle Marsh (}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Le Marsh }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Le}{\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Merssh}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 was also part of the bishop's land; see Hutchins, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iv. p. 141.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab QUEEN EDITH. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wife of King Edward the Confessor, daughter of Earl Godwin. She}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 died in 1075.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab BISHOP ALWOLD.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Alwold (Aelfweald) II, Bishop of Sherborne from 1045 to 1058.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab SINOTH. Domesday }{\i\insrsid9113064 Sinod }{\insrsid9113064 represents }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Sigenoth}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; see }{\insrsid9113064 von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid9113064 
Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\insrsid9113064 ,}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  p. 360.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WIFE OF HUGH ... 2 HIDES. They were at Pinford (see 2,6 Sherborne note) according to }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 4,}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 where Alfred }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Nichol }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is a mistake for Alfred }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Lincoln}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 as also in the Glastonbury Feodary (Weaver, p. 31). The land}{
\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 also appears in the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i (Henry III) no. 580, concerning Alfred of Lincoln; see DOR 55 wife note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 16 CARUCATES. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Carucatae }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 here and elsewhere in the south-west counties and Domesday Gloucestershire}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
and Herefordshire are not the carucates of the former Danish areas (which are equivalent to}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 the hide), but are the same as 'land for }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 y }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
ploughs' (see 2,1 land note). The fact that on many}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 occasions, Exon uses the term }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 carucatae terrae }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 where Domesday has }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 terra est}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ... }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 car' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 proves that}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 the two terms were synonymous; see, for example, Exon 527b4, the summary of Glastonbury Abbey}{\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 lordship lands in Dorset ( = Domesday 8,1;3) and compare SOM 2,1 land note. As can be seen}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from this entry and 3,1;9-l 1 land was measured in carucates when it had not been hidated;}{
\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 it did not pay tax. In Domesday Herefordshire there is a distinction between the newly-conquered}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 lands measured still in carucates and the older acquisitions assessed in hide}{
\insrsid9113064 .}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab OF THIS EXEMPT LAND. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Quieta}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 commonly in Domesday meaning 'immune from dues or}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
service' (see HEF 1,44), 'free from tax' (as here, referring to the 16 carucates) or}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 'quit', 'settled', 'discharged' (as in WOR 2,74 and HEF C14).}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 3\tab [LAND OF THE MONKS OF SHERBORNE]. See DOR 2 bishop note.
\par \tab \tab No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this chapter.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 3,1\tab SHERBORNE. This and the next four places (Oborne, Thornford, Bradford [Abbas] and Compton, 3,2-5) can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Sherborne Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WOODLAND ... WIDE. The rest of the line in the manuscript is blank after this; see 1,8}{\insrsid9113064  land note }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 on a similar space left.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE OF WHAT THE BISHOP ... MEN-AT-ARMS ... THANES [HAVE]. Referring}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 to 2,6.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ALWARD.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Aluuardus }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is a common reduction in Domesday for Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 \'c6thelweard }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 \'c6
lfweard}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see von Feilitzen, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , \'a7\'a7 109, 111 and pp. 155-157, under }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Al-weard }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and pp. 188-189, under }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 \'c6thelweard}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 As it is usually impossible to discern which form is intended, the present editors on the}{
\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 advice of JMcND have decided to keep to the base form }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Alward}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 36,2 Aethelward note and 36,7 Alward note.}{
\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 3,2\tab OBORNE. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wocburne}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 For the grant, see Birch, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cartularium Saxonicum}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 1308 (= }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Early Charters of Wessex}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 611 p. 173 =}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Robertson, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, no. L, pp. 104-107, 349 = Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 813). It is }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Woburn }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 5, 41.}{
\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 3,3\tab THORNFORD. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Originally a grant of 8 }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 cassati }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 to the Sherborne Cathedral clergy by Eadred, king of the West Saxons (946-955): }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Early Charters of Wessex}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 594 p. 170 (= Birch, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cartularium Saxonicum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 894 = Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 516). See }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 5, 41.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 3,4\tab BRADFORD [ABBAS]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Originally a grant, dating from 933, of 10 }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 cassati }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bradan-forda }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 by King Athelstan: Birch, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cartularium Saxonicum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 695 = }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Early Charters of Wessex}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 578 p. 166 = Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, no. 422). The land involved part of 'Castleton' (ST6417) lying to the east of Sherborne, now surviving only as a parish name; see 2,6 Sherborne note. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bradeford }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is associated with }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Wyke }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Wyke farm in Castleton, ST6014, formerly in Bradford Abbas; see F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 211] in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. pp. 5, 41.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 3,5\tab COMPTON.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  The land included both Over Compton and Nether Compton (F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 213; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 36, 41) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Stawell }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Stallen in Compton, ST6016]: }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 4-5. It is }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cumpton Hauwey }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 36, 58.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 3,6\tab STALBRIDGE. In the Tax Return for Brunsell Hundred it is the monks 
of Sherborne, rather than the bishop as in Domesday, who hold 11 hides in lordship which correspond to the 6 hides of lordship land in the present entry and the 5 hides of lordship land in the next entry (Stalbridge Weston, 3,7). The Abbot of Sherborne ho
lds }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Stapulbrigg }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Weston }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Brunsell Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 40; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 8.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab MANASSEH [* THE COOK *]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Manasseh the cook: the Tax Return for Brunsell Hundred records that the king has not had tax from the 3 virgates which Manasseh the cook (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 q}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
[}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 o}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 cus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ) holds from the land of the monks of Sherborne.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab W[ILLIAM] SON OF THE KING. William Rufus, King of England 1087-1100. His seizures of church land began early.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 3,7\tab [STALBRIDGE] WESTON. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Also known as Weston [Abbot]: F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 38. See 3,6 Stalbridge note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab A WOOD OF MEDIUM SIZE [TREES]. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Silua modica}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 as also in 3,9. Perhaps the same as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 silua minuta}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 here translated 'underwood' (as in 3,4): SOM 1,26 and SOM 5,12;17 have }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 silua modica }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 where the corresponding Exon entries have }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 nemusculus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 the normal equivalent of Domesday's }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 silua minuta}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 . According to }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Domesday Geography of South-West England}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 177, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 silva modica}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 silva minuta }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
('underwood') were interchangeable. See, however, STS 11,11 wood note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 3,8\tab CORSCOMBE. The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Beaminster Hundred. It is }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Coriscumbe }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. pp. 7, 41. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Halghestok }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Halstock, ST5307], held by the Abbot of Sherborne in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 4, may have been part of it.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 3,9\tab STOKE [ABBOTT].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  See DOR 2 bishop note. In the order of Domesday this }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Stoche }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 appears between two places in Beaminster Hundred; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 7 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Stoke Abbatis}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ); }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 179b.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab A MILL WHICH PAYS 5s. [***]. The main scr
ibe of Great Domesday left blank the rest of the line after the mill's details, perhaps for details of meadow; or possibly for some pence to be added to the mill's render, although there is a dot after }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 solid'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .
}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 1,8 land note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 LIST 6\tab NINE MANORS ... FOR THE SUPPLIES OF THE MONKS. The revenues from 3,1-9 are devoted to supplying the monks of Sherborne with provisions, and perhaps clothing as in 12,14.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 3,10\tab BEAMINSTER. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 According to }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 7-8, 41, the land was at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bemenistre }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Beaminster], }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Langedon }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Langdon in Beaminster, ST5001], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cedindon }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Codyngton }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Cheddington, ST4805], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Axnolre 
}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Axnoller farms, ST4803 and 4904], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pikiete }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Picket farm in South Perrot, ST4705], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 La Chapele }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Chapel Marsh in Beaminster, ST4804] and }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Seweberge }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [probably a part of Seaborough, Somerset (ST4206) lying in Dorset; the church held Seaborough in SOM 3,1. Seaborough is now entirely in Dorset]. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cotteleye }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
[Coltleigh farm in Mapperton, SY5199] may have been a part of Beaminster or of Netherbury (3,11).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab H[UMPHREY] OF CARTERET.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  The }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 H. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 probably abbreviates }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hunfridus }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
who occurs in the Tax Return for Witheridge Hundred, in Devon (Exon 66b3). Mauger of Carteret, probably a relation, occurs in Domesday Somerset and Devon. Carteret is in the d\'e9partement of Manche, France: Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 81.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 19 SMALLHOLDERS, 2 VILLAGERS. Unusually, the villagers do not head the list of population, as also in 26,15;25;49.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 3,11\tab NETHERBURY.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 7-8, 36, 41, list land at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Nitherbury }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Netherbury], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Mangertone }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Mangerton, SY4895], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Melepes }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Melepleychs }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Melplash, SY4898], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Worth }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
[now Bingham's farm, SY4796, in Netherbury; see F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 275] and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Esse }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Ash in Netherbury, SY4695; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 8; F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 275]. Mangerton and Melplash may have been associated with Bowood (3,17).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 2 PLOUGHS THERE. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ibi h't .ii. car' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('he has 2 ploughs there') with the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 h't }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 corrected to }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 s't }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('there are'), although }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 h't }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 occurs in the similar phrase in 3,10, and as the 2 ploughs are obviously in lordship }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 h't }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 would not be out of place.
}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 3,13\tab CHARDSTOCK. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 An outlying part of Beaminster Hundred in the Middle Ages. The 12 hides probably included Wambrook (ST2907) granted as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Awanbruth }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
by Egbert king of the West Saxons (802-839): }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Early Charters of Wessex}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 121 no. 402 (= }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 337); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
VCH Somerset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iv. p. 222. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 36, Wambrook is held }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 cum membris }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from the Bishop of Salisbury and is 
coupled with Chardstock in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 41. Modern boundary changes have placed Chardstock in Devon, but Wambrook in Somerset; see \{Introduction: The County Boundary\}.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WOODLAND 2 LEAGUES. Originally written }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .iii leu'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 but corrected to }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .ii }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 with }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 as }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (for }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 duas}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 interlined to emphasize the correction.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 LIST 7\tab 'SHIPLEY'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 . In WIL 3,5, under the land of the Bishop of Salisbury, Charnage is said to have been exchanged for 'Shipley'. There is no indication in Domesday Wiltshire nor in Domesday Dorset of}{
\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 the date of the exchange, nor is 'Shipley' surveyed elsewhere. It is possibly the place of that name in Aldbourne (in Wiltshire, SU2278); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 293. In that case the 'exchange' may have been connected with the adjustments that took place in the sees of Ramsbury, Sherborne and Salisbury in the eleventh
 century or between the Bishop of Salisbury and the monks of Sherborne (see DOR 2 bishop note).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 3,14\tab `CERNE'.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  An unidentified land named from the river (see \{Introduction: Places Named from Rivers\}) in Dorchester (later St George) Hundred or in "Stana"
 Hundred (later part of Cerne, Tatcombe and 'Modbury' Hundred). In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 8, the Bishop of Salisbury holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wolwowetone }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
[Wolfeton in Charminster, SY6792; see 1,4 Dorchester note and 26,5 'Cerne' note]. This might be a part of Charminster (2,1) or this present holding.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ALMER. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Originally written }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Algar }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 with an }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 m }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 interlined above the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 g }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
in correction, but with no line or dot under the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 g }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 to indicate its deletion.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab A WOMAN }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 HAS IT THERE. The }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 hanc }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 refers to the plough, not the land, although she \'84 als
o holds the land in this instance. This Domesday phrase is regularly made clear by Exon's fuller wording. Also, see 26,56 and 34,14 where }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 has }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
can only refer to the 3 ploughs in each entry (but compare DEV 22,2 where in a similar phrase the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 hanc }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 must refer 
to the land, perhaps in error; see DEV 22,2 villagers note). See also DOR 13,7 villagers note and 58,3 land note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 4 SMALLHOLDERS. In the manuscript and Farley }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .iiii. bord'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 the Ordnance Survey facsimile reproduces the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 b }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 bord' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 badly so that it looks like }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 hord' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 which does not make sense.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab MEADOW, 3 ACRES. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Acras }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is in the accusative after }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 tenet}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
From the Latin it does not appear that the woman held the pasture as well.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE 20s. Originally written }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .x. solid}{\i\cf1\up6\insrsid9113064 '}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 but a second }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 x }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 has
 been squashed in to correct the value to }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .xx. solid'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 3,15\tab `BARDOLFESTON'.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Like Athelhampton (3,16) this was in Puddletown Hundred. These two places were }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pidele Bardalston and Pidele Athelamston }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
held from the Bishop of Salisbury in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 16, 35, 54. Both appear to be identifiable from an analysis of the Tax Return for Puddletown Hundred. For the lost 'Bardolfeston', see F\'e4gersten, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 176; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 315; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Royal Commission on Historical Monuments }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ), iii. p. 229. The holding at 3,15 must have been 'Bardolfeston' since it is held in 1086 by the wife of Hugh and is found among the lands held by Alfred of Lincoln from the Bishop of Salisbury in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i (Henry III) no. 580; see DOR 55 wife note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 3,16\tab ATHELHAMPTON. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 3,15 'Bardolfeston' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 3,17\tab BOWOOD. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 7-8, 41; and 3,11 Netherbury note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab OSMER AND AELFRIC. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Osmar }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 clearly; Farley misprinted }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Oswar}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 . }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Elfric }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
was written over the erasure of a smaller word, so is compressed.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 3,18\tab BUCKHAM. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bukeham }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 7-8, 36.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab WELLWOOD. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Welle }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 attached to Buckham is unlikely to be Wool (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 72 no. 54); this hide seems
 to be identifiable as lying in Beaminster Hundred from an analysis of the Tax Returns and is more likely to have lain within that hundred than to have been remote from it; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, iii. p. 133. The identification with Wellwood is due to }{\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{\insrsid9113064 .}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE 40d. Written in darker ink, not quite aligned, with the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .xl. den' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in the right margin; probably added later.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 4\tab BISHOP OF BAYEUX. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Odo, half-b
rother of King William and elder brother of Count Robert of Mortain. Earl of Kent 1066 x 1067 to 1082, then 1087 to 1088. He was 'regent' during some of King William's absences abroad, notably in 1067 with Earl William of Hereford. At the time when Domesd
a
y was written he was in prison in Rouen and many of his lands (for example, those in Gloucestershire and Worcestershire) were treated as forfeited to the king. He was released by King William on his deathbed in 1087 and returned to England, but rebelled a
gainst William Rufus, was defeated in 1088 and all his lands in England confiscated. He fled to Normandy and died in 1097. Bayeux is in the d\'e9partement of Calvados, France.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this chapter.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 4,1\tab RAMPISHAM.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  It can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Tollerford Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab WADARD <OF COGGES>. The name Wadard occurs on some 50 holdings in Domesday Book, all probably held by one individual. All but a couple of properties in Kent were held as a tenant
 of the Bishop of Bayeux, the exceptions being held from St Augustine's Abbey which accommodated other of Odo's tenants. This singular distribution proves Wadard's identity, confirmed by the descent of his holdings to form the core of the barony of Cogges
: Sanders, }{\i\insrsid9113064 English Baronies}{\insrsid9113064 , pp. 36-37; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday People}{\insrsid9113064 , p. 444 (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab [* EARL *] LEOFWIN. The name Leofwin is so common that it is an almost hopeless task to identify the earl of that name if the scribe has omitted his title. Even in the Suss
ex heartland of the Godwinson family where Leofwins are suspiciously thick on the ground, there are few cases where a reasonably secure identification can be suggested. It is likely, for instance, that most if not all of the substantial manors held by a L
e
ofwin in the county (11,21;68. 12,40. 13,20;38;43) had belonged to the earl; but which of them is guesswork. Only in the case of Worthing and Sompting (13,35-40), where the interdependence of holdings and the coincidence of the names of Earl Godwin, Leofw
i
n and Tosti suggest a family holding, has an identification been accepted as reasonably secure. Outside the county, it is probable that the Leofwins at Islington (MDX 11,2) and Libury (HRT 5,10) were the earl since no other Leofwin was a lord of men in Mi
d
dlesex and other men held from the earl in Libury. It is also likely that it was the earl who held the present substantial manor since this devolved upon the Bishop of Bayeux who succeeded Earl Leofwin in several other counties. Finally, Count Eustace of 
Boulogne probably acquired his very valuable manors of Stanford and Laver (ESS 20,43;45) from the earl, these being by a very considerable margin the most valuable manors held by a Leofwin in Essex. See also Clarke, }{\i\insrsid9113064 English Nobility}{
\insrsid9113064 , pp. 200-203, who omits from his list the substantial manors held by the earl's men in Hemel Hempstead and King's Langley (HRT 15,10-11) (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 5\tab BISHOP OF COUTANCES. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Geoffrey of Mowbray, one of King William's chief justices. He held a great deal of land in the south-west, esp
ecially in Somerset and Devon. He is also sometimes (as in GLS 6,1 and the Somerset Tax Returns) called the Bishop of Saint-L\'f4, which is near Coutances in the d\'e9partement of Manche, France.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this chapter.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 5,1\tab `}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 WINTERBORNE'. }{\insrsid9113064 Domesday}{\i\insrsid9113064  Wintreburne}{\insrsid9113064 . It was left unidentified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 
, iii. p. 73 no. 56, but identified as a place lying on the eastern River Winterborne by }{\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{\insrsid9113064 . }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 It has not proved possible to locate this and the next }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Wintreburne}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  (5,2) in a particular}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 hundred or even on one of the two rivers. It is identified by Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dorset Survey}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 p. 121, as Winterborne Houghton, a view followed by }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 7, but without supporting evidence. Geoffrey's land might be expected to descend
 to the honour of Gloucester and might be }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Winterborn' Clench }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Clencheston }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Winterborne Clenston] held from that honour in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 750, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 29, in Combsditch Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WOODLAND 3 \'bd FURLONGS LONG AND 4 ACRES AND 2 WIDE. There are two}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 possible interpretations of these dimensions as they stand. The scribe may have originally}{\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 omitted the '4 acres' from the length, although it is unusual for acres and furlongs to be mixed in measurements
, there are several instances in Dorset (19,4, 26,40;63. 54,9. 55,8) and in Devon (DEV 1,53). Or the width may be 4 + 2 acres. The scribe may also have omitted }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 q' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 for }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 quarentinas }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('furlongs') after }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ii}{\i\cf1\up6\insrsid9113064 as}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , making the translation either 'woodland 3 \'bd furlongs and 4 acres long and 2 furlongs wide' or 'woodland 3 
\'bd furlongs long and 4 acres and 2 furlongs wide'. On the accusative case of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 acras}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see 26,40 woodland note. Compare 1,16 pasture note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 5,2\tab `WINTERBORNE'. Domesday}{\i\insrsid9113064  Wintreburne}{\insrsid9113064 . It was left unidentified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 
, iii. p. 73 no. 57, but identified as a place lying on the eastern River Winterborne by }{\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{\insrsid9113064 . }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 5,1 'Winterborne' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab PASTURES. Latin }{\i\f820\cf1\insrsid9113064 pastur\'ea}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 nominative plural, or perhaps genitive singular 'of pasture 8 fur
longs ...', although the genitive is not normally used in this particular phrase; it is possible that }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 was omitted before }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 l'g }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
as in 6,3. Compare the plural used in the Exon entry corresponding to 48,1 (48,1 meadow note), and see DEV 1,57 pasture note for another example of }{\i\f820\cf1\insrsid9113064 pastur\'ea}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 6\tab THE BISHOP OF LISIEUX. Gilbert Maminot, King William's doctor and chaplain, Bishop of Lisieux 1077-1101: Orderic Vitalis, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Ecclesiastical History}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 (Chibnall, iii. pp. 18-21). Lisieux is in the d\'e9partement of Calvados, France. Hugh Maminot (his son; see Sanders, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 English Baronies}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 97) holds from him in the Tax Return for Badbury Hundred; the latter's daughter married Ralph }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Keynes }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 whence the names Tarrant Keyneston, Coombe Keynes in Dorset and Somerford Keynes (this las
t being in Wiltshire Domesday (WIL 6,2), now in Gloucestershire).
\par \tab \tab No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this chapter.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 6,1\tab TARRANT [CRAWFORD].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Later}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Parva Crawford }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 to distinguish it from 'Great Crawford' (Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Craveford}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Spetisbury; see 56,12; and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 181. It is adjacent to Tarrant Keyneston (6,3) and can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Badbury Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 6,2\tab PRESTON. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 In Tarrant Rushton parish. Tarrant Rushton itself probably lay in }{\insrsid9113064 \lquote Langeburgh' Hundred in 1086 }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
and was subsequently in Cranborne Hundred, but an analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that Preston lay in Badbury Hundred in 1086. Subsequently it seems to have been partly in Pimperne Hundred and partly in Badbury Hundred, straddling the River Tarrant (
}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 14; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Lay Subsidy Roll (1334)}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 76). It is sometimes called Tarrant Preston; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 252. Before 1066 it had been part of the royal manor of Hinton Martell; see 1,31 bishop note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab EDWARD THE CLERIC.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 clericus }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
can refer to a lay job or to an ecclesiastical office, and Domesday rarely indicates which is intended. The English 'cleric' preserves the ambiguity of the Latin. According to Lennard, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Rural England}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 404, there is no real distinction between the terms }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 clerici}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  canonici }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  presbiteri}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 :}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Domesday Staffordshire the holders are called the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 canonici }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 of Wolverhampton in the Landholders' List (folio 246a), but both the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 clerici }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and 
}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 canonici }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in STS 7 itself, and the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 presbiteri }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 of Wolverhampton in STS 12,1.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab NO VILLAGE POPULATION is recorded for this holding, perhaps in error. There are some eighty entries in Dorset where no 'villagers' are mentioned; although many of these entries are by no means full (as 3,12. 19,11 etc.) about 
half record ploughs, mills, meadows etc., with no one, apparently, to work them, not even in most cases any slaves on the lordship land. Compare 54,2 [Value] note on omitted value statements.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 6,3\tab TARRANT [KEYNESTON]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in 'Langeburgh' Hundred. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 87, William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
de Kaines }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Tarent' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Langeber' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred. The same holding is }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Tarente de Kaynes }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 1, and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Tarente Keyneston }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 27, both in Pimperne Hundred; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 43, 46; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 123; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. (Edward I) no. 433, and viii.(Edward III) no. 504.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 1,000 EELS. From the mill-pond, a common render from mills in Domesday Herefordshire, but the only one in Dorset.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 6,4\tab COOMBE [KEYNES]. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cumb' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is held by William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Kaines }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Winfrith Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 87, and by the heirs of Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Kaynnes }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 9; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 2
9, 49. An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it also lay in Winfrith Hundred in 1086. A separate settlement, now lost, was 'Southcombe'; see Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, i. p. 347, Taylor, 'Lost Dorset Placenames', p. 215; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i.}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 p. 116; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. (Edward I) no. 637.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 7\tab [LAND] OF THE BISHOP OF LONDON. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Terra }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 omitted in error in the manuscript, as happens on several occasions.
\par \tab \tab The bishop in 1086 was Maurice, Bishop of London 1086-1107; also Chancellor after Bishop Osmund of Salisbury: }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
i. p. xvii; see DOR 2 bishop note.
\par \tab \tab No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this chapter.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 7,1\tab `ODENHAM'. Domesday }{\i\insrsid9113064 Odeham}{\insrsid9113064 . It was left unidentified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 73 no 62, followed by }{\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{
\insrsid9113064 . However,}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  'Odenham' is a lost place in the parish of Wimborne Minster; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 189; and 1,21 Odo note. It can be located i
n Badbury Hundred by an analysis of the Tax Returns.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab LAND FOR \'bd PLOUGH; 1 PLOUGH THERE, HOWEVER. See also 55,21. 56,12;20. 57,1;3;12, and compare HEF 2,5 'the villagers have more ploughs than ploughable land'. See also CAM 26,18 ploughs note for anoth
er example of the scribe drawing attention to the excess of ploughs on the land over the number in the estimate.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 8\tab LAND OF ST MARY'S, GLASTONBURY. No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this chapter. A summary of the}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Glastonbury Abbey fief in Dor
set appears in the incomplete folios at the end of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Liber Exoniensis }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (folio 527b4-6). It corresponds fairly closely to DOR 8; see 8,1 land note; 8,1 villagers note and 1,2 cottagers note.}{\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\insrsid9113064 8,1\tab [STURMINSTER] NEWTON.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Sometimes called }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Sturminster Abbatis }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from Glastonbury}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Abbey's holding; see F\'e4gersten, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 48. It is }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Niweton' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Sturminster] Newton Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 87. The Feodary of Glastonbury Abbey dating from 1342, (Weaver pp. 30-50) gives a survey of all the abbey's 
Dorset lands, with additional details. The 30 hides of Sturminster Newton consisted of 8 at Okeford Fitzpaine (listed separately in Domesday at 8,2), 5 hides of the abbot's}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
lordship at Newton itself and 7 hides and 1 virgate of his lordship at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Kentlesworth qui modo dicitur Marnhulle }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ['Kentleworth', lost in Marnhull: F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 42; Marnhull is at ST7818]. Land held by subtenants consisted of 5 hides and 3 virgates in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Kentlesworth}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 2 \'bd hides in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Colbere }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Colber, ST7714; see 1,2], 2 \'bd hides in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Stoche }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
[?Hewstock, ST786154, on the first series Ordnance Survey one-inch map (sheet 18 of 1811, reprinted 1969 as sheet 84), Yewstook on the six-inch map of 1886] and 2 hides in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bagber }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
[Bagber in Sturminster Newton, ST7615]. The 5 hides and 3 virgates of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Kentlesworth }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 are further subdivided by the Feodary into 2 hides and 3 virgates there [also called }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Kentlesworth'}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Burton vel Marnhulle}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pointing to Burton Street in Marnhull, ST776187] held by Alfred of Lincoln (a descendant of the wife of Hugh so
n of Grip who held other Glastonbury land in 1086; see 8,2 wife note and DOR 55 wife note); 1 hide in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Knyghtestrete }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ['Knightstreet', lost in Marnhull: F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 43; perhaps the same as Marnhull Street, on the first series Ordnance Survey one-inch map at ST7719] held by William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Sancto Martino }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
(see 8,1 Waleran note); 1 hide in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Yerdegrove }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Yardgrove in Marnhull, ST7717: F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 44]; and a further 1 hide in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Kentlesworth}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See also }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 42; Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iv. p. 314.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab LAND FOR 14 PLOUGHS. That is, 14 carucates: together with the 'land for 8 ploughs' in 8,3, these formed the '22 carucates of land not paying tax' in the summary of the Glastonbury lordship lands in Dorset (Exon 5
27b4). See 2,1 land note and 2,6 carucates note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VILLAGERS ... . Though Domesday does 
not mention their ploughs, it would seem from the summary of Glastonbury lordship lands in Dorset (Exon 527b4) that they had 12 ploughs: 20 ploughs are given for the 'villagers' for the lordship sections of the manors of Sturminster Newton and Buckland Ne
wton (8,3), and 8 ploughs are recorded for the 'villagers' in Domesday for the latter. Similarly the lordship ploughs can be worked out at 5 here (9 in all and 4 are recorded at Buckland Newton).}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WALERAN HOLDS 6 HIDES. The 6 hides are probably those found in the Glastonbury Feodary (Weaver, pp. 30, 34) as 2 \'bd hides each at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Colbere }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Stoche }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 and 1 hide at 'Knightstreet' (see 8,1 Newton note) held by William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Sancto Martino}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Members of this family hold some of the lands of Waleran that descend from his fief; see DOR 40 Waleran note. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 37, 56, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Esse }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
[not Ash in Stourpaine (as in the index to }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ), but Nash Court in Marnhull, ST7819: F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 58] is held by Roger }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Sancto Quintino}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ROGER [* ARUNDEL *]}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  1 HIDE. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 37, 56, Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 filius Pagani }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (Fitzpaine) holds }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Baggeber' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Bagber, ST7615] from the Abbot of Glastonbury. Many of Roger Arundel's lands (DOR 47) descend to this Robert and it is probable that the 1086 tenant here is thus Roger Arundel.}{\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab KETEL 1 HIDE. Perhaps represented by 'Kentleworth' in Marnhull; see Taylor, 'Lost Dorset Placenames', p. 208; and 8,1 Newton note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab THESE 8 HIDES CAN BE PLOUGHED BY 11 PLOUGHS. This formula is one of the common ones used by Exon where Domesday has 'Land for }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 n}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 ploughs', the estimate of the arable. It is an unusual phrase in Domesday (but see WIL 13,2 and compare HEF 25,7). It may be that the main scribe of Great Domesday in this instance failed to alter the formula he was copying to fit in
 with the usual Domesday phraseology.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE \'a37. Originally written }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Valet}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 but corrected to }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Valent }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 to agree with the }{
\i\f820\cf1\insrsid9113064 .viii. hid\'ea}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 However, the singular is often used in the Value' statement where the plural would be grammatically correct, as in the next 
statement of Gotshelm's 4 hides.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 4 HIDES ... FROM THE KING. Glastonbury land also appears in the king's hands in Domesday Somerset, owing to the difficulty "Turstin" had in controlling his church; see the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle (C version) for 1083. It
 is possible that this indicates that the land was already separated from the church. The location of the four hides is unknown, but a portion of Bagber certainly became permanently alienated and passed to the Earl of Gloucester, becoming an outlying part
 of his hundred of Cranborne; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 87; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 26, 39, 46; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. (Henry III) no. 530. The other portion of Bagber remained in [Sturminster] Newton Hundred.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab MEADOW, 16 ACRES. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Acras}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 accusative, after }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 habet }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
'has'; the mill may also be an object, but apparently not the woodland.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 8,2\tab OKEFORD [FITZPAINE].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in 'Hundesburge'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred, although later a part of [Sturminster] Newton Hundred
. It is held there by Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 filius Pagani }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (Fitzpaine) from the Abbot of Glastonbury in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 37. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Adford }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 appears to be an error for }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Acford}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see 1,7 Okeford note and 54,6 Shillingstone note. The land included }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Southgarston}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 a lost place (F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 47), held from the Abbot of Glastonbury by Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
filius pagani }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , v. (Edward II) no. 607.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab FROM IT. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de ea}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 feminine to agree with }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ecclesia}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 has been corrected from the masculine }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 eo}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab MEADOW, 21 ACRES. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 xxi. ac' p'ti}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,; Farley omitted the abbreviation sign over }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ac }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in error.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab HUGH'S WIFE}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  HAS 4 HIDES. The land was at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Lollebrok }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Lowbrook Farm in Okeford Fitzpaine, ST7809], held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. pp. 37, 56, by William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Gouiz}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see DOR 55 wife note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ALFRED [* OF `SPAIN' *] }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 2 HIDES. The Tax Return for 'Hundesburge'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred states that the king has had no tax from 2 \'bd
 hides which Alfred of 'Spain' holds from Glastonbury Church. As no other 
Alfred is mentioned in Domesday as holding from Glastonbury, it would appear that this Alfred is Alfred of 'Spain': perhaps he originally had more than 2 hides of the 8 in Okeford Fitzpaine.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 8,3\tab BUCKLAND [NEWTON].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Buckland Newton and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Plussh' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Plush, a detached part of Buckland Newton parish, ST7102] were granted by King Edmund (939-946) to }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Elfleda }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and later sold to Glastonbury Abbey; see Birch, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cartularium Saxonicum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 768 (= }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Early Charters of Wessex}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, no. 584 p. 168 = Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 474). See also Birch, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cartularium Saxonicum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 1177 (= }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Early Charters of Wessex}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 606 p. 173 = Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 742). The land is held by Glastonbury Abbey in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 30. The Glastonbury Feodary (Weaver pp. 30-50) divides Buckland into 7 hides and 1 \'bd virgates at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dontyssh' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hermyngeswell' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
[Duntish, ST6907, and Armswell, ST7203], 2 hides in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Knolle }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Knoll in Buckland Newton, ST7004], 2 \'bd virgates in}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Plussh' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Plush] and}{\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 1 hide in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Brochamton' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Brockhampton, ST7106] divided into three holdings one of which, 1 virgate held by Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Belet}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , was at }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Othull }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [unidentified]. The land at Duntish and Armswell is the 7 hides and 1 \'bd virgates held by the wife of Hugh in 1086, by Alfred of Lincoln in the Glastonbury Feodary (Weaver p. 31) and by William }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Gouiz }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (DOR 55 wife note) in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. pp. 30, 42, 50. Godlingston (SZ015802) in Swanage is said to have been an outlying part of Duntish manor; it is perhaps surveyed here or under the land of the wife of Hugh at 55,42; see }{\i\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Miscellaneous}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. no. 614; Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 662.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab LAND FOR 8 PLOUGHS. 8 carucates; see 8,1 land note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 8,4\tab WOODYATES. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The Glastonbury land consisted only of East Woodyates in later times; see Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, iii. p. 441. West Woodyates had a different subsequent history, passing into the hands of Tarrant Abbey; see Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, iii. p. 607. West Woodyates was later fully in Wimborne St Giles Hundred, East Woodyates remaining a tithing of Cranborne Hundred; see \{Introduction: Tithings\}.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab H[UGH]'S WIFE.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Uxor H.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
the wife of Hugh son of Grip, the sheriff, a large landholder in Dorset. The land is held in the Glastonbury Feodary (Weaver, p. 30) by Alfred of Lincoln, to whom Hugh's fief descended (DOR 55 wife note).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 2 VILLAGERS AND 5 SMALLHOLDERS [***]. There is a gap of about nine letters' width in the manuscript after this, presumably left for the villagers' ploughs. See 1,26 villagers note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 8,5\tab PENTRIDGE. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Originally granted with }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Domerham }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Damerham] and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Mertone }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Martin], as 100 }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 mansae}
{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , by King Edmund (939-946) to Aethelfled his queen for life with reversion to St Mary's of Glastonbury; see Birch, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cartularium Saxonicum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 817 (= }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Early Charters of Wessex}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 169 no. 63 = Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, no. 513). Damerham and Martin were both formerly in Wiltshire (WIL 7,1), later transferred to Hampshire. The land was alienated from the church in 1086 (hence }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ipsa \'e6cclesia tenuit }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 for the usual }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ipsa \'e6cclesia tenet}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and never subsequently returned, becoming part of the honour of Gloucester, in Cranborne Hundred; compare 8,1 hides note and see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 26; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. (Henry III) no. 530.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab WULFWARD [* WHITE *].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Wulfward White, from whom the king did not have tax on the 1 hide and 3 virgates he held (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 tenuit}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; Ellis misprinted }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
tenent}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from Glastonbury Church in the Tax Return for 'Alvredesberge' Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 8,6\tab LYME [REGIS]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Lym}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The holding was at 'Colway' now represented by the Colway Lane estate; see F\'e4
gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 287; Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 40, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, iii. p. 56 and p. 74 note 83. It is }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Colbegh iuxta Netherlym }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 coleheygh' inter Uplym in Devonia at Netherelym in Dorset'}{\i\cf1\up6\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
in the Glastonbury Feodary (Weaver, pp. xxx, 31, 49. The abbey holds Uplyme just over the border in Devon (DEV 4,1).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WULFGEAT. His subtenancy seems to have passed to the wife of Hugh son of Grip or her descendants, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Coleweye }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 being held from Alfred of Lincoln in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 751; see DOR 55 wife note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 13 SALT-WORKERS. At Lyme Regis itself; see 26,15 salt-houses note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 9\tab ST PETER'S ABBEY, WINCHESTER. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 That is, the New Minster, renamed Hyde Abbey when it was moved in 111
0 from its original situation near the Old Minster (Winchester Cathedral) to Hyde outside the city walls. Probably founded in 901 and dedicated to the Holy Trinity, the Virgin Mary and St Peter, it was originally for secular canons, but they misbehaved an
d were replaced by Benedictine monks.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this chapter.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 9,1\tab PIDDLETRENTHIDE. An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in "Stana" Hundred in 1086. The Domesday form is }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pidrie }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 to which the hidage in French (}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 trente hides}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 '30 hides') has been attached. For the probable grant to the New Minster at Winchester, see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Early Charters of Wessex}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 621 p. 176 (= }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 436), although Roger Arundel's tenure suggests a more complex history. It is held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 92, by the Abbot of Hyde as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pidele Trentehydes }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 to clothe his monks (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ad vestiendum suos monachos}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 );}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 436; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 179a.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE OF THE CHURCH'S LORDSHIP. In the manuscript }{\i\f827\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dni\'fb }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in error for }{\i\f827\cf1\insrsid9113064 D'ni\'fb }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (as in 11,1 etc.). Farley corrected to }{
\i\f827\cf1\insrsid9113064 D'ni\'fb}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 though he did not always correct the scribe's mistakes (for example in 1,5. 2,1).}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ALMER <OF PIDDLETRENTHIDE> AND ALFRITH <OF PIDDLETRENTHIDE> ... ROGER ARUNDE
L. All of Alfrith's holdings in Dorset and Somerset appear to have devolved upon Roger Arundel, but Almer's name is too common to be sure of that in his case. On the basis of these facts Peter Clarke suggests that Alfrith and Almer were brothers, designat
ed joint predecessors of Roger Arundel; but Piddletrenthide is the only manor he acquired from both of them and that is stated here to have been two separate manors before the Conquest so their relationship cannot be safely assumed. Clarke (}{
\i\insrsid9113064 English Nobility}{\insrsid9113064 
, pp. 234-35) includes three estates where the pre-Conquest holder was an Aelmer, not Almer (47,5-7). But these are forms which the scribe can be shown to have often confused; and given the clear status of Almer as a predecessor of Roger and the substanti
al nature of the three holdings, a scribal error is perhaps more likely than a third significant predecessor in Dorset (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 10\tab ST MARY'S, CRANBORNE. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 It was founded }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 c}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 . 980, most of the community moving to Tewkesbury in 1102 whereupon Cranborne became a cell of the latter; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 70-71; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iv. p. 465.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this chapter.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 10,1\tab IN GILLINGHAM. In the manuscript }{\i\f827\cf1\insrsid9113064 INGELINGEH\'c2}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 one word in error for two. Normally when the scrib
e stated that a holding was 'in' a village or town, he gave the hidage (for example, in 10,5).}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab HUGH [* SON OF GRIP *] }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ... GAVE IT ... .Another gift of Hugh [son of Grip] to Cranborne Church is Orchard (55,47). Neither gift is cross-referenced in Domesday.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 10,2\tab BOVERIDGE. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in 'Alvredesberge'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab BRICTRIC [* SON OF ALGAR *].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Probably Brictric son of Algar: }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 31. On him, see 1,17 Brictric note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 2 \'bd HIDES. In the manuscript there is an ink blot covering the }{\i\f820\cf1\insrsid9113064 \'ea }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and part of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 7}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  of the }{\i\f820\cf1\insrsid9113064 hid
\'ea }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 7.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab HEATHLAND. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bruaria}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from Late Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 brucus }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (Modern French }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 bruy\'e8
re}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ).}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 This is the only reference to it in Domesday, but see 34,5 water-meadow note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 10,3\tab WIMBORNE [ST GILES].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  The place lies in Domesday in a group of manors that were certainly in 'Alvredesberge' Hundred or in 'Langeburgh'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Hundred in 1086. It is probably Monkton Up Wimborne in Wimborne St Giles parish, held as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wymburne Abbatis }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 39 by the Abbot of Tewkesbury, with which Cranborne Abbey was associated; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 265;}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and DOR 10 St 
Mary's note. Cranborne Abbey received part of the revenues of the church of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wymborn Karentlim }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 178b, now All Hallows (farm) in the same parish (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 264).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 10,4\tab `LEFTISFORD'. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 A lost place in Verwood parish, described in an Inquisition of 1416 as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 juxta le Fairewode}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 256.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 10,5\tab `LANGFORD'.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  The order of Domesday suggests a place in 'Alvredesberge' Hundred or 'Langeburgh'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Hundred, so the manor is unlikely to be Langford in the parish of Stratton, as suggested tentatively by Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 571; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, iii. p. 74 no. 74; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 373. It is more probably 'Langford' in West Parley; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 232. It }{\insrsid9113064 
was left unidentified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{\insrsid9113064 .}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 2 VILLAGERS HAVE IT THERE. The plough; see 3,14 woman note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 10,6\tab TARRANT [MONKTON]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Langeburgh' Hundred and is later held by Tewkesbury Abbey, being transferred to Monkton Up Wimborne Hundred; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 292.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 11\tab ST PETER'S OF CERNE [ABBAS]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The list of lands given in Domesday should be compared with the foundation charter of this abbey (Kemble, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Codex Diplomaticus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, no. 656 = }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Early Charters of Wessex}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 613 p. 174 = Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, no. 1217), a grant by the ealdorman Aethelmaer, son of Aethelweard, in 987. The lands include }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cernel}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  [Cerne Abbas, 11,1] and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 \'c6schere }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [unidentified], 6 }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 cassati }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 at Minterne (ST6504) not mentioned separately in Domesday and the holdings at Winterborne Abbas (11,11), Renscombe (11,16), Poxwell (11,6), Affpuddle (11,5) and Bloxworth (11,4).The 6 hides at }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bridian }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and the}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 12 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ulteriore Bridian }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
seem to correspond to Domesday's 11 hides at Little Bredy and 9 hides in Long Bredy (11,10;12). Most of the lands reappear in a list of fees in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 92. See }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 43.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 11,1\tab [Exon 36a1]}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab ST PETER'S CHURCH ... HOLDS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'The abbot has', as also elsewhere in DOR 11. The church is only mentioned in Exon in the heading for this Domesday chapter.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab CERNE [ABBAS].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in "Stana" Hundred in 1086. The 22 hides probably included }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Nithercerne}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 [Nether Cerne, SY6698] and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Minterne}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  [Minterne Magna, ST6504], whose churches are held by the abbey in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 184a; see Hutchins, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iv. pp. 17, 469. Hawkchurch which appears as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Havekechirche}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  in}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 183a, and is now in Devon and remote from Cerne Abbas, was a possession of the abbey and a tithing in Cerne, Tatcombe and 'Modbury' Hundred and may have been included in these hides; see the Cerne Abbey Cartulary (Stubbs, p. 68); Hutchins, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iv. p. 46. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Godmanston }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Godmanstone, SY6697] and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Sydelinch }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Up Sidelinch }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Up Sydling, ST6201] may also have been part of this land; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 39, 58.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab BRICTWIN HOLDS 4 HIDES. According to an analysis of the Tax Return for "Stana" Hundred, the king has not had tax from 2 \'bd hides which Brictwin holds from the abbot of Cerne.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab The corresponding entry in Exon has 'A thane called Brictwin holds 4 hides of thaneland'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab HE HELD THEM LIKEWISE. The 4 hides.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE OF THE CHURCH'S LORDSHIP WAS AND IS \'a321. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'This manor pays \'a321 for the church's use; value when the abbot acquired it, as much'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab OF BRICTWIN'S, 100s. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'This land [of Brictwin] pays 100s a year. And this thane pays 30s a year to the church apart from service'. The Latin for the second sentence reads }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Et iste tegn}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 us}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  reddit p}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 er}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\f827\cf1\insrsid9113064  ann\'fb
 .xxx. sol}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 idos}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\f820\cf1\insrsid9113064  \'eaccl}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 esi}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\f820\cf1\insrsid9113064 \'ea quo min}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 us}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  excepto seruitio}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 which is untranslatable as it stands (the translation in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. pp. 74-75 no. 76, 'And this thegn renders 30s a year to the church by which (it is) the less except service' does not make sense). }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Quominus }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
is a conjunction restricted to use after verbs of hindering and preventing. It looks as if the Exon scribe intended to write }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 quominus seruitium faciat }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (or some such), the clause }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 reddit 
}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ...}{\i\f820\cf1\insrsid9113064 .xxx. solidos \'eacclesi\'ea }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
having the force of a preventing' clause, the whole meaning being 'this thane pays 30s a year to the church to avoid (or to discharge his obligation of doing) service'. The scribe may have been unable to manage the construction after }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 quominus }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (rare in Medieval Latin) and fallen back on the usual phrase in these circumstances }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 excepto seruitio }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
'apart from service' (see 1,16 and the corresponding entry in Exon), which is ambiguous, and then failed to delete the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 quominus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
. Apart from this, the entry is clear and neat and there is no change of scribe, either within the entry or immediately after it, to account for this lapse in grammar.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 11,2\tab [Exon 36a2]
\par \tab LITTLE PUDDLE. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The corresponding entry in Exon has 'It is [part] of the church's own land'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab WILLIAM [!1! OF MOUTIERS !1!]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 In the manuscript there is an erased (though still visible) }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 7 }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 before }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Will's}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 It was probably erased because William was a subtenant of the abbot, rather than of the church (but see 8,4. 10,4 etc.). Exon has }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Willelm}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 us
}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ] }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de monasterio }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 here and for 55,22, but }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de monasteriis }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 for 55,15. Moutiers-Hubert is in the d\'e9partement of Calvados, France; see Tengvik, 
}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 102. Winterborne Muston is named after his descendants, as is Muston (SY7295) which was probably part of this holding; see Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 802; and 26,21 'Piddle' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab IN LORDSHIP 1 PLOUGH. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'In lordship 1 \'bd ploughs'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Value when W[illiam] acquired it'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 11,3\tab [Exon 36b1]
\par \tab RADIPOLE. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 1,22 'Wey' note. The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Cullifordtree Hundred and is }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Reppole }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Rapely }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Cullifordtree Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 19, 38, 57.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab OF WHICH HALF IS IN LORDSHIP. Half the land, 1 \'bd hides, see 1,7 of which note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WITH ... 1 VILLAGER; 5 SMALLHOLDERS HAVE 2 PLOUGHS AND 1 \'bd HIDES. }{\i\f827\cf1\insrsid9113064 Ibi ... c\'fb ... i. uill'o 7 v. bord' h'nt .ii. car' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ... . Either }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 h'nt }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 (= }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 habent}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is a scribal error for }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 h'ntibus }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (= }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 habentibus}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 :}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 'with ... 1 villager and 5 smallholders who have 2 ploughs ...') or }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 uill'o }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is an error for the nominative }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 uill's }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 (= '1 villager and 5 smallholders have 2 ploughs ...'). Exon supports this latter, stating that the villagers (used generically) have 1 \'bd
 hides and 2 ploughs and that (the abbot) has there 1 villager and 5 smallholders etc. Compare 56,21 smallholders note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 11,4\tab [Exon 36b2]
\par \tab BLOXWORTH. . The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Combsditch Hundred. It is held by the Abbot of Cerne as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Blockysworth }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Combsditch Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 29, 43, 48.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab LAND FOR ... . In}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 T'ra}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Farley omitted the abbreviation sign in error, probably because it occurs in the middle of the interlined 7 }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 dimid' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (of '5 \'bd hides').}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 9 SMALLHOLDERS. So Exon manuscript; Ellis misprinted }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .viii.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 17 PIGS; 26 [SHEEP?]. The corresponding entry in Exon has }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 x 7 vii. porcos 7}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 xx. 7}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 vi. porcos}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 one of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 porcos }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is a scribal error, probably
 the second as pigs are normally entered after cobs, with sheep succeeding them. However, '17 cattle; 26 pigs' could be the intended meaning.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 11,5\tab [Exon 36b3]
\par \tab AFFPUDDLE. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in Bere Hundred in 1086. It is Aeffa's or Aelfrith's 'Puddle', given by ealdorman Aethelmaer to Cerne Abbey in 987; see DOR 11 Cerne note; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 179a; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 289. The land was later in Barrow Hundred and included }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Palyngton }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
[Pallington, SY7891]: }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 21, 36, 42.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 4 SMALLHOLDERS. The corresponding entry in Exon adds '5 cottagers' after them; see 1,15 smallholders note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab [WIDE]. Supplied from Exon The main scribe of Great Domesday appears to have omitted the end of the}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 entry, perhaps because he was not sure of the meaning of the last sentence in Exon, or}{
\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 because it might have been written later; 11,5 when note. There is no full-stop after}{\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 t'ntd' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
but an illegible erasure of a few letters, with the rest of the line blank. The scribe}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 may have intended to finish it later, began a new folio for the next entry and promptly}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
forgot it.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab SAID TWO MANORS. Bloxworth and Affpuddle.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WHEN ... GRIP. The corresponding entry in Exon has }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 & q}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ua}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\f827\cf1\insrsid9113064 ndo abbas recepit ualeb\'e2t c. solidos plus p}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 re}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 dict}{\i\f820\cf1\insrsid9113064 \'ea due mansiones q}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ui}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 a p}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ro}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  h. filio grip fuer}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 unt}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  dep}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 re}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 dati}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 depredati }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is a scribal error for the feminine }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 depredatae }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 to agree with }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 mansiones}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ).}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 This is a confused sentence with }{\i\f820\cf1\insrsid9113064 predict\'ea
 due mansiones }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 out of place. It would seem by the use of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 pro }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
('on behalf of') that Hugh son of Grip got his henchmen to do the plundering for him. In the Exon manuscript there is an erasure of about 14 letters before this statement, part of an erasure which began after }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .vii. lib' }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 in}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 the preceding line. The Exon scribe definitely changes with this last sentence (but possibly as early as after the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .vii. lib'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and it might be that this sentence was added after the main scribe of Great Domesday had used the manuscript, though this would not explain the omission in Domesday of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 in lat'}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064  ('in width') in the woodland measurement, nor of the value of the manor.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 11,6\tab [Exon 37a1]
\par \tab POXWELL.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  The Abbot of Cerne holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pokeswell }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 9, 30, 49, and part of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Upryngstede }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ['Up Ringstead', now Upton, SY7483, adjacent to Poxwell] in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 29,. See 52,2 Ringstead note and 55,34 Ringstead note. An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that the land lay in Chilbury Hundred in 1086.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 4 VILLAGERS ... SHEEP. In the corresponding entry in Exon, these details follow the statement about the wife of Hugh son of Grip and it is not clear whether the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 habet }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
refers to Roger Bushell (see 11,6 hides note and 55,3 Roger note) or to the abbot.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 26 'RODS'. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Virg' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 here (and also in 11,17 and 30,2) may abbreviate }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 uirgas }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 uirgatas}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Exon regularly uses }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 uirga }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 where Domesday has }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 uirgata }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('virgate') in the hidage state\-
ment (see B1 hides note). The measure intended here, however, appears to be linear not areal (which the virgate is) and is of uncertain length. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Virga }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is the Lati
n for a rod or pole or measuring stick and like many Domesday measurements its size seems to have been subject to local variations or is not attested by contemporary evidence. From 11,17 it would appear that more than 10 }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 uirgae }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 constituted a furlong. See }{\i\insrsid9113064 Revised Medieval Latin Word List}{\insrsid9113064 ,}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  under }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 uirga}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab PERCHES. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 pertica }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 perca}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 a measure of length, usually reckoned at 5 \'bd
 yards, though a 20-foot perch was in use for measuring woodland until last century; see Zupko, }{\i\insrsid9113064 Dictionary of English Weights and Measures}{\insrsid9113064 ,}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  under }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 perch}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 In Dorset it is used as a measure of both pasture (as here) and woodland (as in 19,8).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab HUGH'S WIFE.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  That is, Hugh son of Grip; Roger Bushell (see 11,6 hides note) is also a tenant of hers on alienated church land at 55,3; see 55,3 Roger note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 3 HIDES ... 1 PLOUGH THERE. In the corresponding entry in Exon, Roger Bushell holds the 3 hides from Hugh's wife and}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 he has 1 plough there.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab THIS LAND WAS. The corresponding entry in Exon has '... in 1066'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE 40s ... \'a37. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Value of this village for the abbot's use \'a37; for Roger Bushell's}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 use, 40s.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 11,7\tab [Exon 37a2]
\par \tab WOODSFORD. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 East Woodsford, held as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Estwerdesford }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 by the Abbot of Cerne in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 9, 30, 49 in Winfrith Hundred; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 88; the Red Book of the Exchequer (Hall, ii. p. 545). For West Woodsford, see 57,13.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab In the corresponding entry in Exon, Brictwin has it from the abbot at a revenue; he has 2 ploughs there. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bristuin' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in the Exon manuscript; Ellis misprinted }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bristuan'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 11,8\tab [Exon 37a3]}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab HETHFELTON. Part or all of the village may have been in Bere Hundred in 1086 according to an analysis of the Tax Returns, though later it was in Winfrith Hundred; see 49,14 Hethfelton note. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids
}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 39, 58, the Abbot}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 of Cerne holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Welesbrigg }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Barrow Hundred (probably the same as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Celebrigg }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 37), that is Wool Bridge in East Stoke (SY8487), probably a part of this holding; see the Cerne Abbey Cartulary (Stubbs, p. 69).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab 3 VIRGATES. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The corresponding entry in Exon has '3 virgates of land called Hethfelton'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Value when the abbot acquired them'. Similarly for the past values in 11,11;15-17.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 11,9\tab [Exon 37a4]
\par \tab WORGRET.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Part or all can be located in Bere Hundred in 1086 from an analysis of its Tax Return; see 49,14 Hethfelton note and 57,7 Worgret note. It was 
later locally in Hasler Hundred, though a tithing of Barrow Hundred, a later subdivision of Bere Hundred. It is included in Barrow Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 42.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 1 HIDE. The corresponding entry in Exon has '1 hide called Worgret'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \'bd MILL. The other half of the mill in Worgret is recorded in 37,10.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 11,10\tab [Exon 37a5]}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab LITTLEBREDY. Together with Long Bredy (11,12), it was held by the Abbot of Cerne in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 92, as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Langebrid' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Litlebrid'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Littlebredy can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Uggescombe' Hundred, Long Bredy from that for Eggardon Hundred. }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Lytelebridye }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Langebridie }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 are}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 both held from the Abbot of Cerne in 'Uggescombe' Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 6, 33-34, 53.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Value in the time of Abbot E.' He is Abbot Edward; see }{\insrsid9113064 Knowles, Brooke and London, }{\i\insrsid9113064 Heads of Religious Houses}{\insrsid9113064 , }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 p. 37.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 11,11\tab [Exon 37b1]
\par \tab WINTERBOURNE [ABBAS]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in Eggardon Hundred in 1086, as it did in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 3,}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
33. In the latter it is }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wynterborn Waterlyse}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; see F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 242.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab LAND FOR 10 PLOUGHS. The corresponding entry in Exon has '10 ploughs can plough them (the 10 hides) a year'; the inclusion of}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  per annum }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is rare in this phrase.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Value when the abbot acquired it'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 11,12\tab [Exon 37b2
\par \tab LONG BREDY.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  See 11,10 Littlebredy note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab LAND FOR 9 PLOUGHS. Omitted in the corresponding entry in Exon and perhaps obtained by the main scribe of Great Domesday by adding the lordship, villagers' and thane's ploughs (though this was not a rel
iable method because of the discrepancies elsewhere between the plough estimate and the actual ploughs; see 1,2 ploughs note). A similar addition by the main Domesday scribe occurs in DEV 3,51 and DEV 23,1; see DEV 3,51 land note and DEV 23,1 land note. I
t is interesting that the Domesday scribe did not give a plough estimate for the next entry (11,13) where it is similarly missing in Exon, though he could have 'deduced' one from the 3 (or 3 \'bd
 ) ploughs actually recorded; see also 55,28 hide note and compare 19,14 land note. It is of course possible that the Domesday scribe had additional information for 11,12, but not for 11,13. For the other additions by him, see B4 abbess note.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 7 VILLAGERS AND 9 COTTAGERS. In the corresponding entry in Exon they are classed as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 rustici }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('countrymen') when their ploughs are mentioned, but as the usual }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
villani }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 when their land is stated. Compare 55,24 villager note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab A THANE. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The corresponding entry in Exon has 'an English thane'; he has the plough.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'This manor pays \'a318 for the abbot's use and \'a33 for the thanes' use' (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 tagnorum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
genitive plural, a scribal error for the singular }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 tagni}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 11,13\tab [Exon 38a1
\par \tab NETTLECOMBE.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Both Nettlecombe and [West] Milton (11,14) can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Eggardon Hundred. The holdings seem to have included Mappercombe in Powerstock (SY5195); see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 3, 33.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab LAND [FOR *** PLOU
GHS]. A gap of about seven letters' width has been left after this in the manuscript for the number of ploughs to be added when known. Compare 19,14 and see 1,1 life note on similar omissions by both Domesday and Exon.
\par \tab \tab In the corresponding entry in Exon, the plough estimate is totally absent. Compare 11,12 land note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 2 PLOUGHS. The corresponding entry in Exon has '2 \'bd ploughs'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WOODLAND. After the dimensions, the corresponding entry in Exon adds 'this woodland bears no fruit'. In other words, it}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 did not provide beechmast and acorns for pigs; compare 11,16 }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 silua infructuosa}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab A MAN-AT-ARMS }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 HOLDS 2 HIDES. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'A man-at-arms, a Frenchman, has 2 hides of thaneland,}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
which could not be separated from the church, and 2 ploughs'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS \'a312. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Value when the abbot acquired it, 20s more', thus making the whole}{\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 T.R.E.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  value \'a311 15s.}{\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\insrsid9113064 11,14\tab [Exon 38a2
\par \tab [WEST] MILTON.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  So called to distinguish it from Milton Abbas: F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 242. It can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Eggardon Hundred; see 11,13 Nettlecombe note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 5 PLOUGHS. The corresponding entry in Exon has '3 ploughs'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Value when he acquired it', presumably referring to the abbot.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 11,15\tab [Exon 38b1]
\par \tab KIMMERIDGE.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in Hasler Hundred in 1086. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cumerygge }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Hasler Hundred is held by the abbot in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 23, and associated with an unidentified }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hamelton }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 71) in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 37.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Value when the abbot acquired it'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 11,16\tab [Exon 38b2
\par \tab RENSCOMBE.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Hasler Hundred although it was later transferred to Rowbarrow Hundred; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 44.}{
\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 5 HIDES AND 1 VIRGATE. The details of the lordship and villagers' holdings amount to 6 hides. See 1,19 tax note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 7 VILLAGERS AND 7 SMALLHOLDERS [***]. In the manuscript there is a gap of about 16 letters' width after this, presumably for the villagers' ploughs; Exon similarly omits them; see 1,1 life note and 1,26 villagers note).}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab UNPRODUCTIVE WOODLAND. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Silua infructuosa}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; that is,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
it did not provide beechmast and acorns for pigs (see 11,13 woodland note). The pigs that Exon records must have fed elsewhere. Woodland was also used to provide fuel and timber for building and repairing houses and for salt-houses, as well as for hu
nting; see WOR 2,15;31 and WIL 13,10.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WETHERS. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Berbices}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 :}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 male sheep kept for mutton. The milk for this manor was presumably provided by the cows and goats.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Value when Abbot W. acquired it'. Perhaps the William, Abbot of Cerne,}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
who was present at the council of Gloucester in 1085 according to the compiler of the}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Chronicle of Lanercost: British Library, Cotton Claudius D. vii, folio 53v (= folio 55v of the modern foliation).}{
\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 11,17\tab [Exon 38b3
\par \tab SYMONDSBURY. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in Whitchurch Hundred in 1086. It is }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Symondesbergh}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , also}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
in Whitchurch Hundred, in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 45.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 10 'RODS'. See 11,6 'rods' note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Value when the abbot acquired it'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 12\tab LAND OF MILTON ABBEY. In Exon the heading for the section containing lands in DOR 12 is 'Land of St Peter's Church, Milton. In Dorset'.
\par \tab \tab The list of holdings in Domesday should be compared with King Athelstan's Charter of which a Latin and a Middle English version exist: Birch, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cartularium Saxonicum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , nos. 738-39 (= Kemble, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Codex Diplomaticus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , nos. 1119 and 375 = }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Early Charters of Wessex}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 580 p. 167 = Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, no. 391). Land is granted at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Muleborn }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 26 hides [probably Milton Abbas, 24 hides in 12,2]; at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wonlonde }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 5 hides [Wolland, 12,10]; at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Fromemuthe }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ['Fromemouth'] 3 hides of which 2 are on }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Ye }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Green Island] and 1 at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Ore }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Ower, where Domesday (12,13) places all 3 hides; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 13]; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Clyve }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 3 hides [Clyffe,}{\insrsid9113064  2 }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 hides in 12,6]; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Liscombe }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 3 \'bd hides [Lyscombe, 12,9]; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bordelestone }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 1 hide [Burleston,}{\insrsid9113064  3 }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 hides in 12,5]; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Litele Pidele }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
1 hide [Little Puddle, 2 hides in 12,15]; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Sidelyng }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 30 hides [Sydling, 29 hides in 12,1]; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Stoke }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (or }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cattestoke }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
in Middle English version) 5 hides [Cattistock, 10 hides in 12,4]; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cumptune }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 6 hides [West Compton, 5 hides in 12,3]; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Osmingtone }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 5 hides [Osmington, 10 hides in
 12,7]; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wydecombe }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 2 hides [Whitcombe, 6 hides in 12,8]; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Holewourthe }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 6 hides [Holworth, 5 hides in 12,12]; and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Stokelonde }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 (or }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Ercecombe }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in the Middle English version) 10 hides [Stockland,12,14, alternatively named from Yarcombe, ST2408]. The charter also gr
ants 2 hides in Chalmington (in Cattistock, ST5900) and 6 hides at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hyllefeyld }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Hilfield, ST6305] which are not separately mentioned in Domesday. The charter is summarized in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 90; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 44. The possessions of the abbey are usefully studied in Traskey, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Milton Abbey}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 231.}{
\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 12,1\tab [Exon 43a1]
\par \tab CHURCH ... HOLDS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'The abbot has', as also elsewhere for DOR 12.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab SYDLING. This holding can be identified with Sydling St Nicholas from an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Modbury' Hundred. The missing 1 hide of the original 30 hides may be held by the Count of Mortain in 26,27. In an }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Inquisitio}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ad quod damnum }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 cited in Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, iv. pp. lxxvii-lxxx, Sydling consists of 38 hides and contains }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Brodesidlinge }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Sydling St Nicholas] with }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hulfeld }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Hilfield; see DOR 12 Milton note], }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 La Halfehid }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ['Halfhide'; see F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 202], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Upsidlinge }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Upsydling], }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Eliston }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Ellston, ST6302], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Chalminton }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Chalmington; see DOR 12 Milton note], and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Blakmore }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
[either Blackmore in Glanvilles Wootton, ST6709, or Blackmore Vale or Forest; see F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 208].}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab OF THESE. Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de his}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  is}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 probably a scribal error for the more usual }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de ea }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
'of this [land]' (see 1,7 of which note), unless it refers back to the 29 hides.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 12,2\tab [Exon 43b5]
\par \tab MILTON [ABBAS]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The holding can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Hilton (later Whiteway) Hundred; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 13, 40.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab IT IS THE HEAD OF THE ABBEY. Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 caput}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 the chief manor and head of the abbey's fief.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 12,3\tab [Exon 43a2]
\par \tab [WEST] COMPTON.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Formerly Compton Abbas West; see 19,5 Compton note. It is locally in Tollerf
ord Hundred although in fact a detachment of Cerne, Tatcombe and 'Modbury' Hundred. It was in the same situation in 1086, being identifiable from an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Modbury' Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 6 VILLAGERS AND 5 SMALLHOLDERS. There is no dot after }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 bord' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
in the manuscript, but, as the marginal ruling here cannot be seen, it is unclear whether the Domesday scribe intended to add the villagers' ploughs at a later stage; there is no apparent reason, however, why he did not include the 2 ploughs mentioned
 in Exon (similarly the villagers' ploughs in 16,2. 36,7 and 55,26;34).}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 12,4\tab [Exon 43a3]
\par \tab CATTISTOCK. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Stoche}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 but see DOR 12 Milton note. It can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Modbury' Hundred. In the }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Inquisitio}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ad quod damnum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  cited in 12,1 Sydling note, Cattistock is said to consist of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Doudeleshegh }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
['Dudley Moor'; see F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 195], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Witham }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Witcham, ST568021], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bestedene }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
['Bestedon'; see F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 195] and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Chantmerle }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Chantmarle, ST5802], all places in Cattistock parish.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 12,5\tab [Exon 43b1]}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab BURLESTON. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pidele}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 . The foundation charter (see DOR 12 Milton note) grants Burleston and Little Puddle to Milton Abbey. The two Domesday holdings at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Pidele }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (here)}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pidre }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (12,15, identified as Little Puddle) are likely to represent these, but it is not clear which is which.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab SMALLHOLDERS [HAVE] \'bd HIDE. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'The villagers [have] \'bd hide. The Abbot has 5}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 smallholders ...'. This is an exa
mple of 'villagers' being used in a general sense. The same happens}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 for 12,11 and 36,7, but see 12,16 smallholders note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 12,6\tab [Exon 43b2]
\par \tab CLYFFE.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  The Abbot of Milton's 1 hide of lordship in the Tax Return for Bere Hundred may represent this holding, which was later in Puddletown Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 5 VILLAGERS HOLD THEM. The two ploughs; see 3,14 woman note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 12,7\tab [Exon 43b3]
\par \tab OSMINGTON. An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in Cullifordtree Hundred, where it is also held by the Abbot of Milton in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 19-20.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 127 SHEEP. The corresponding entry in Exon has }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 c. oues }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 7 }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 xx. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 7 }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 vii}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Numbers are often written like this in Exon, especially}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 with }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 c}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  cc}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  ccc }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 etc.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 12,8\tab [Exon 43b4]}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WHITCOMBE. An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in Cullifordtree Hundred, where it is also held by the Abbot of Milton in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 19-20.}{\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 12,9\tab [Exon 44a1]
\par \tab LYSCOMBE. This land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Hilton (later Whiteway) Hundred.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 12,10\tab [Exon 44a2]
\par \tab WOOLLAND. This land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Hilton (later Whiteway) Hundred. It is held by the Abbot of Milton in Whiteway Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 13.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 12,11\tab [Exon 44a3]
\par \tab WINTERBORNE [WHITECHURCH].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\insrsid9113064 Domesday}{\i\insrsid9113064  Wintreburne}{\insrsid9113064 . It was left unidentified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 
, iii. p. 79 no. 103, but located on the eastern River Winterborne by }{\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{\insrsid9113064 . However, t}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 he manor can be identified from an analysis of 
the Tax Return for Combsditch Hundred; it included land at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 La Leye }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [La Lee, ST8301] in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 p. 184b; see 
}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 83. The prior of Milton Abbey receives a portion of the revenues of the church of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Albi Monasterii}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 that is [Winterborne] Whitechurch, in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 178b.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 12,12\tab [Exon 44b1]
\par \tab HOLWORTH.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in Chilbury Hundred in 1086. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. 9, the Abbot of Milton holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Holeworth }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Winfrith Hundred which by then had absorbed Chilbury Hundred.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab SESTER OF HONEY. The sester is a measure, sometimes of liquid, as here, sometimes dry; of uncertain and probably variable size (see GLS G1 measure note and GLS 19,2 measure note). It was reckoned at 32 oz. for honey; see Zupko, 
}{\i\insrsid9113064 Dictionary of English Weights and Measures}{\insrsid9113064 , }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 p. 155. Sesters of honey also occur in the value statement of 37,9. See Lennard, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Rural England}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 126, on the significance of this render.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 12,13\tab [Exon 44b2]
\par \tab 
THIS ENTRY and those that follow to the end of folio 78b (12,13-16. 13,1) are written smaller, though in the same colour ink; it may be that the main scribe of Great Domesday had a break after 12,12 and began again the next morning when the light was bett
er. The writing shows a gradual increase in size from the top of folio 78b to the end of 12,12, suggesting perhaps that it was getting dark. Compare 26,46-61 on folio 79d where the writing also suddenly becomes much smaller.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab OWER. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Ailwood (later Rowbarrow) Hundred. 1 hide was at Ower, 2 hides on the island of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Ye }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (or }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Sancte Elene }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Inquisitio}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ad quod damnum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 cited in 12,1 Sydling note), that is Green Island; see DOR 12 Milton note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab NO PLOUGH IS RECORDED THERE. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'There is no plough on these [3 hides] and none (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 nec}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
can plough [them]'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 13 SALT-WORKERS WHO PAY 20s. Their payment may be a money-rent as there is no value statement for this entry (as is pr
obably the case in 57,2; see 57,2 smallholders note), but salt-workers also pay money in 8,6 and the value is given for that entry. See 54,2 [value] note on omitted value statements.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 12,14\tab [Exon 44b3]
\par \tab STOCKLAND.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Now in Devon, but long a detached part of Whitchurch Hundred. It is held there by the abbot in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 45. Dalwood (see 1,4 Fordington note) was a part of this land according to the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Inquisitio}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ad quod damnum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  cited in 12,1 Sydling note.}{\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE \'a39 [***]. As there is no full stop after }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 lib'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
it may be that the scribe intended to add the 1066 value of Buckland when available; it is not recorded in Exon either.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab THIS MANOR ... CLOTHING. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'This manor was always for the monks' supplies and clothing and it was always before 1066 [part] of the lordship revenue of the abbot'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 12,15\tab [Exon 44b4]
\par \tab [LITTLE] PUDDLE. Domesday }{\i\insrsid9113064 Pidre}{\insrsid9113064 . It was identified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 79 no. 107, as Little Puddle and by }{\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{\insrsid9113064 
 as Briants Puddle and/ or Turners Puddle. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 12,5 Burleston note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 1 PLOUGH ... THERE. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'The abbot has 1 plough there'; in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 dominio }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 omitted, perhaps in error.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 12,16\tab [Exon 45a1]
\par \tab `CERNE'. Domesday }{\i\insrsid9113064 Cerne}{\insrsid9113064 . It was left unidentified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 79 no. 108, identified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{\insrsid9113064  as Godmanstone. }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 The land was possibly the holding of the abbot later called Little Minterne, or Minterne Parva, in Buckland Newton (ST6603); see Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iv. p. 17.}{\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab AIULF [* THE CHAMBERLAIN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab [1] HIDE. Plain }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 hida}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 i }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 una }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 was often omitted by the main scribe of Great Domesday; se
e also 26,22 and 56,14.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab LESS 5 ACRES. Briefly omitted by the scribe and added at the end of the line with transposition signs (which are more interlined than Farley printed them). It is interesting that in Exon }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 v. agros min' }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 is interlined, and so could have been momentarily missed by the main scribe of Great Domesday if, as seems likely, he was copying; see 12,16 mill note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 5 SMALLHOLDERS [HAVE]. The corresponding entry in Exon has '7 smallholders', the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .vii. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 corrected early on from }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .iii.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 . Exon has }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 bordarii}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 instead of the usual }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 villani}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
in the statement of their land; likewise for 55,5. See 12,5 smallholders note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab MILL ... 20d. In the corresponding entry in Exon the mill render is 25d; the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 v. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is interlined and for that reason probably missed by the ma
in scribe of Great Domesday; the Exon scribe and the colour of the ink is the same as for the rest of the entry, implying that the interlineation was not a later correction. The fact that the other interlineation in the entry (the 'less 5 acres' of the lo
r
dship land) was originally missed by the Domesday scribe and then added at the end of the line (see 12,16 acres note), does not prove that these interlineations in Exon were done after the main Domesday scribe had seen the entry, because the omitted words
 were obviously added almost immediately, before the scribe wrote the next line with the population etc.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS 10s. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Value when Aiulf acquired it, 10s'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab THE HOLDER ... CHURCH. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Edric held before 1066; he could not be separated from the church's service'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 13\tab LAND OF ABBOTSBURY ABBEY. Exon has the heading 'Land of St Peter's Church, Abbotsbury', with 'In Dorset' added by a different scribe, for the lands in DOR 13.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab St Peter's, Abbotsbury, was founded by Urk, a }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 huscarl }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 of King Cnut and King Edward the Confessor, and his wife Tole whose name distinguishes Tolpuddle (13,2); see Kemble, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Codex Diplomaticus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 841 (= }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Early Charters of Wessex}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 628 p. 177 = Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 1064) and }
{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i.}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 no. 108 p. 28 . In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 92, the abbey holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Abbedesbir'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Portesham}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Helton}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Tolepidele }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wdeton}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064  given}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  per Oro }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (that is, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Orc}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  et Tolam uxorem suam}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 All these lands are held by the abbey in Domesday; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset,}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  iii. p. 44.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 13,1\tab [Exon 39a3]}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab ABBOTSBURY CHURCH HOLDS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'The Abbot has', as also elsewhere for DOR 13.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ABBOTSBURY.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  The manor can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Uggescombe' Hundred. The land seems to have}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 included }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Raddun }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Rodden, SY6184] and an unidentified }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Finelegh }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Fynle }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Lay Subsidy Roll (1334)}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 77]; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 5, 33, 53.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab TO THIS MANOR ... BY FORCE. In the corresponding entry in Exon this is written in the left margin.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 1 HIDE. Hugh son of Grip appears to have despoiled this church of several lands; his wife holds part of Abbotsbury here and part of Portesham in 13,4. A further 'acquisition' is mentioned i
n 55,3, but none is cross-referenced in Domesday. See B1 Hugh note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 13,2\tab [Exon 39a1]
\par \tab TOLPUDDLE. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See DOR 13 Abbotsbury note. Abbotsbury Abbey holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Tolle Pudele }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 15, in Puddletown Hundred; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 35, 54; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 184a.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 14 COTTAGERS. In the manuscript above the last }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 i }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 xiiii }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is a small and irregular }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 /.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, more probably a slip of the pen than a correction to the figure; Farley omitted it.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 13,3\tab [Exon 39a2]
\par \tab HILTON.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Held in Whiteway Hundred by the abbot in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 13, 36, 40, 55.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 13,4\tab [Exon 39b1]
\par \tab PORTESHAM.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that Portesham was in 'Uggescombe' Hundred in 1086, and it remained there; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 5, 33, 53. The church had 
also held the dues of the adjacent village of Waddon (23,1) before 1066.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 1 VIRGATE OF LAND. See 13,1 hide note. This land may have been at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Corfton }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Corton in Portesham, SY6385], given by a descendant of the wife of Hugh to East Holme Priory; see DOR 55 
wife note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab HOLDS IT BY FORCE. Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ui }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 '(by force') is interlined. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 49, misreads it as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 vi}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064  ('six [manors]'): 'his widow has taken six'. it is, however, correctly translated in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 80 no 112.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 13,5\tab [Exon 39b2]
\par \tab SHILVINGHAMPTON. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The manor can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Uggescombe' Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 13,6\tab [Exon 40a1]
\par \tab [ABBOTTS] WOOTTON. T}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 he taxable size of this holding together with that of Atrim (13,8), leaving aside the 1 hide of lordship at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Widetone}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 is 3 \'bd hides. This amount is entered in the Tax Return}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
for Whitchurch Hundred where both places lay in 1086, as paid in another hundred. The 'other hundred' is 'Uggescombe' Hundred where Abbotsbury itself lay. The Abbot of Abbotsbury holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wodeton Abbatis }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 45, in Whitchurch Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 13,7\tab [Exon 40a2]
\par \tab POORTON. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Now North Poorton, a parish in Beaminster Hundred, and South Poorton, a part of Powerstock parish in Eggardon Hundred. With the exception of 54,7, all the other fo
ur occurrences of Poorton can be identified by an analysis of the Tax Return for Redhove Hundred and are therefore probably North Poorton. The Tax Return records the hidage of the present entry in Redhove Hundred, but mentions that \'bd
 hide pays tax in another hundred, probably 'Uggescombe', for in the Tax Return for 'Uggescombe' Hundred payment is received on 4 hides that belong to other hundreds: these are probably the 3 \'bd
 hides of Abbotts Wootton and Atrim (13,6;8, see 13,6 Wootton note) together with the \'bd hide of the present holding.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The Domesday form }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bourtone }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is probably another form of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Povertone }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
rather than Burcombe Farm in North Poorton, as suggested by Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dorset Survey}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 137-38, followed }{\insrsid9113064 by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 80 no.115, and by }{
\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; see F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 281.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 2 VILLAGERS HAVE IT THERE. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hanc}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
referring to the plough; see 3,14 woman note. However, according to the corresponding entry in Exon the villagers also hold the \'bd hide, though not the woodland.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 13,8\tab [Exon 40a3]
\par \tab ATRIM. See 13,6 Wootton note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab BOLLA [!1! THE PRIEST !1!]}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  ... WIDOW. In the corresponding entry in Exon Bolla the priest holds 1 hide and the widow the other hide.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 2 PLOUGHS ... THERE. In the corresponding entry in Exon Bolla has 1 plough and the widow the other plough; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 in dominio }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is omitted, perhaps in error, as also for the land.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 1 VILLAGER. In the corresponding entry in Exon the widow has the villager.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 3 SMALLHOLDERS ... SHEEP. In the corresponding entry in Exon Bolla has them.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 14\tab HORTON ABBEY. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 For the history of the priory, see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 71-73.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par \tab \tab No account }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 of the lands of Horton Abbey in Dorset survives in Exon.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 14,1\tab HORTON. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 It was granted by King Cnut in 1033 as 7 }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 mansae }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 to his thane Bovi; see Kemble, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Codex Diplomaticus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no.}{
\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 1318 (= }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Early Charters of Wessex}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 176 no. 622 = Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, no. 969). An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in 'Canedone'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred in 1086.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab TWO BETTER HIDES. Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 meliores}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  is}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 translated 'best' by }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 80, and in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Domesday Geography of South-West England}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 103,}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 for which the corresponding Latin is rightly }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 optimas}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The implication here seems to be}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 that of the 7 hides some land (extent unspecified) is better than other land. Of this better}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
land, 2 hides are held by the king; not only has he taken land into his Forest, but some}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 of the more productive land.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab FOREST OF WIMBORNE. Now Holt Forest; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 150-51.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab IN THE LEFT MARGIN of the manuscript, level with lines 5 and 6 of this entry, is a large}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
comma-type mark, not shown by Farley but probably contemporary. It seems to refer to forest land, like the 'commas' next to GLS 31,4 and 37,4; see Thorn, 'Marginal Notes and Signs', p. 133 }{\insrsid9113064 (= Erskine and Williams, }{\i\insrsid9113064 
The Story of Domesday Book}{\insrsid9113064 , p. 199).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 15\tab LAND OF ATHELNEY ABBEY.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  St Peter's.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab Exon has the heading 'Land of the Abbot of Athelney', with 'in Dorset' added by a different scribe.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 15,1\tab [Exon 41a1]
\par \tab ATHELNEY CHURCH HOLDS. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The corresponding entry in Exon has 'The abbot has'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab [PURSE] CAUNDLE.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  See 26,70 Caundle note. This land is to be identified with the unnamed gift of 4 hides of land by King Alfred (871-899) in Sherborne Hundred recorded in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 90. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Purscaundel }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pruscaundel }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is held by Athelney Abbey in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 178a, 
}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 41, and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 103. From these last two entries, it is clear that the abbot held half the village less \'bd
 hide (see 56,55 Caundle note), the other half being held by the Abbess of Shaftesbury (see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. (Edward I) no. 111; Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iv. p. 143). Athelney Abbey's holding was given by Count Robert of Mortain in exchange for 'Bishopstone' in Somerset, where he raised his castle of Montacute; the Somerset entry (SOM 19,86) reads: '}{\insrsid9113064 
 The Count holds 'BISHOPSTONE' himself, in lordship. His castle, called Montacute, is there. This manor paid tax for 9 hides before 1066; it was [part] of Athelney Abbey and for it the Count gave that church the manor called |[Purse] Caundle'.}{
\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab TAX FOR 4 HIDES AND 1 \'bd VIRGATES. The details of lordship and villagers' land together with Alfred's holding would appear to total 4 hides and 3 virgates. However, Exon states that Alfred held '1 \'bd
 virgates of these 4 hides': unless the 4 hides is a scribal error for the total 4 hides and 1 \'bd virgates (and perhaps the villagers' 1 \'bd virgates are also a mistake), the Exon scribe seems to be stating that Alfred's 1 \'bd
 virgates were part of the lordship 4 hides.}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 This would be most unusual, but would make the details tally with the tax total. However, see 1,19 tax note for other examples of discrepancies between details and total.
}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ALFRED [!1! THE BUTLER !1!].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Alueredus pincerna}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  in the corresponding entry in Exon.}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 He was the Count of Mortain's but
ler and held a considerable amount of land from him in many other counties, including 1 \'bd hides in 'Bishopstone' (SOM 19,86) which was exchanged with Purse Caundle.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab 1 \'bd VIRGATES. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Alfred the butler who holds from the}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 abbot 1 \'bd
 virgates of these 4 hides'; see 15,1 tax note. This information is written in the midst of the value statement.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE OF THE WHOLE 67s 6d. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Value for the abbot's use, 60s; for Alfred the butler's use ... 7s 6d'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 16\tab LAND OF TAVISTOCK ABBEY. Exon has the heading 'Land of the Abbot of Tavistock in Dorset, by the name of Geoffrey'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 16,1\tab [Exon 42a1]}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab ASKERSWELL. The Tax Return for Redhove Hundred records 2 \'bd hides as paying tax in another hundred. Askerswell was later in Eggardon Hundred; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. pp. 3, 33, 53. Its status seems to have been uncertain in 1086; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 133. Part of this land was apparently in Sturthill, in 'Goderthorn' Hundred, for in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 11, the Abbot of Tavistock holds a half of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Stertel }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (the other half being 55,19).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 2 TRIBUTARIES. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Censores }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 here and in 33,4; in the corresponding entry in Exon here }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 gablatores }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 gablum }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Old English}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  gafol}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 : 'tribute', 'rent'], meaning 'people who pay tribute'. They paid 15s in rent (compare the 5 }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 censarii }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
who paid 5s in DBY 6,38). See also NTT 10,3 tributaries note; Lennard, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Rural England}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 372; Lennard, 'Bordars and Cottars', p. 361 note 1. In the corresponding en
try in Exon, as in Domesday, they are entered after the other classes of 'villagers', just before the Value statement.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE ... WHEN HE ACQUIRED IT. That is, Abbot Geoffrey; see DOR 16 Tavistock note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 16,2\tab [Exon 42a2]
\par \tab POORTON. The manor can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Redhove Hundred; see 13,7 Poorton note; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 425.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WOODLAND. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'underwood' (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 nemusculi}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ),}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
as on some dozen occasions in Devon and some five occasions in Somerset; the reverse - Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 silua minuta }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('underwood') for Exon's }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 nemus }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
('woodland') - also occurs.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Value when the abbot acquired it'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 17\tab LAND OF SAINT-ETIENNE OF CAEN. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 STEFANI }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
is written over an erasure. The church of Saint-Etienne was founded in 1064 by Duke William and consecrated in 1066. Lanfranc, afterwards Archbishop of Canterbury, was the first abbot. Caen is in the d\'e9partement of Calvados, France.
\par \tab \tab The Church of La Trinit\'e9 at Caen also held land in Domesday; see DOR 21 and DEV 13.
\par \tab \tab No account of the lands of Saint-Etienne of Caen in Dorset survives in Exon.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 17,1\tab FRAMPTON ... 2 HIDES. The bulk of the manor forms the major part of Frampton Hundred Tax Return; an analy
sis of the Tax Returns suggests that the added 2 hides were in Cullifordtree Hundred. The wood at 'Hawcombe' is shared with the royal manor of Burton Bradstock, see 1,2 scrubland note. Frampton and Bincombe (17,2) are granted by William I to the Church of
 Saint-Etienne}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i.}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
no. 105 pp. 27-28 ) and confirmed in charters of Henry II and Richard, Archbishop of}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Canterbury (Round, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Documents}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  France}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , nos. 453, 459 pp. 156, 162; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , vi. pp. 1070-7; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 94). The confirmation charters given in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ii. p. 224 no. 1575,}{\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 list the members of the manor of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Frantona }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Biencome }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Bincombe, 17,2] as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Alphilicome}{\insrsid9113064  [}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 Philleyholme? in Hawkchurch, ST3500, now in Devon; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Devon}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 655],}{\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bethescome }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
[Bettiscombe parish, SY3999; see F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 283], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Omouskerigge }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [unidentified], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Erneleys }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
['Ernly', now Benville in Corscombe parish, ST5303; see Drew, \lquote Manors of the Iwerne Valley\rquote ; Boswell, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Civil Division of the County of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 77], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Sedelinch }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Sydling St Nicholas, SY6399], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wintreborna }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Winterborne Came, SY7088], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Ceirnell }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [a holding on the River Cerne] and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Pubich }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [land in Purbeck, that is in Ailwood (later Rowbarrow) Hundred; see 1,8 'Purbeck' note]. Winterborne Came, locally in Cullifordtree Hundred, was a member of Frampton Liberty, the name being derived from Caen; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 261; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 183b. Winterborne }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Huntindon }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
[Winterborne Huntingdon] in Winterborne Came was probably a part of this land, being named from the Earls of Huntingdon who had a grant of part of Frampton (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 263; F\'e4gersten, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 163; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. pp. 38, 57). The land in Purbeck can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Ailwood (later Rowbarrow) Hundred, where tax on 1 hide is said to be paid in another hundred. It lay in Swanage; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 183b; Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, i. p. 661. In later times Frampton Liberty consisted of the tithings of Benville, Bettiscombe, Bincombe, Burton Bradstock, Winterborne Came and Compton Valence. Burton Bradstock was a gift of Henry I; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Regesta Regum Anglo-Nor
mannorum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ii. p. 175 no. 1341, and p. 24 no. 601.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab [* COUNTESS *] GYTHA. Wife of Earl Godwin and mother of Earl Harold Godwinson, easily confused with Gytha, wife of Earl Ralph of Hereford and mother of another Earl Harold. In a number of manors where she
 is not identified by her title or as the wife or mother of earls, she can be confidently identified by the status of the holdings concerned. The four royal manors held by a Gytha in Somerset and Wiltshire, for instance, were collectively valued at over 
\'a3150, and the present huge manor of Frampton held by Saint-Etienne of Caen and evidently once a royal manor was worth \'a3
40. The modest Cornish holdings had been detached from her son's manor of Lanow: see CON 5,7,6 Gytha note. All these manors were in Godwinson territory so Gytha was the Countess of Wessex not the Countess of Hereford. See also Clarke, }{\i\insrsid9113064 
English Nobility}{\insrsid9113064 , pp. 204-205, who list omits Little Puddle [1,14] (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab QUEEN MATILDA. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Mathildis regina }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 with }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 regin }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 interlined, but the last letter was not co
mpleted, possibly because the scribe realized that there was no need for the interlineation.}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Farley printed }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 regine }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (genitive) which would be the wrong case.}{
\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab THE WHOLE WAS VALUED AT AND PAYS ... . It is unusual for both }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 valuit }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 reddit }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 to appear in the 
same statement; see 1,7 value note. Also occurs in 17,2 and 26,29.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 17,2\tab BINCOMBE. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The manor can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Cullifordtree Hundred. See 17,1 Frampton note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab PAYS. Although Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 redd' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 can abbreviate both the present }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 reddit }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and the past }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 reddebat/ reddidit}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 the present is more likely here in view of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 reddit }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in the similar phrase in 17,1.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 18\tab LAND OF THE ABBEY OF SAINT-WANDRILLE]. Farley omitted the chapter number }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 XVIII}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 which is very clear in t
he manuscript. There is no chapter heading in the manuscript, however, due to lack of space. The first three words of 18,1 are written in the same size script as the initial words in DOR 14-17, not in large capitals that the main scribe of Great Domesday 
used for a chapter heading, which is how Farley printed them.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab The Abbey of Saint-Wandrille, originally the Benedictine Abbey of Fontanelle, was founded in 654 by St Wandregisilius (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, vi. p. 1107) and lies on the Seine between Lillebonne and Rouen in the d\'e9partement of Seine-Maritime, France. King William also granted it lands}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
in Surrey (SUR 9) and Cambridgeshire (CAM 10); see also DOR B3, WIL l,9;23g and NTH 56,61.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par \tab \tab The holdings in this chapter }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 appear in Exon under the heading of the king's lordship land in Dorset; see DOR 24}{\insrsid9113064  almsmen }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 18,1\tab [Exon 28a4]}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab THE CHURCH OF SAINT-WANDRILLE HOLDS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'The Abbot of Saint-Wandrille's has'; so also for}{\insrsid9113064  18,2.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab BURTON [BRADSTOCK]}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  ... BRIDPORT ... WHITCHURCH [CANONICORUM]. There is}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 a charter of William I (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 i. no. 110 pp. 28-29 = }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , vi. p. 1108) confirming on Saint-Wandrille's }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Mincherte }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Whitchurch] and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bridetune }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Burton Bradstock; see 1,2 Burton note]. A charter of Jocelyn, Bishop of Salisbury 1142-1184, confirms on Saint-Wandrille's the churches of }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Witchercha}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Bridiport }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Britidon}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; see}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Round, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Calendar of Documents}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  France}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 60 no. 174. These churches, like those of DOR 24, were granted out of royal lands or boroughs and are entered in Exon in the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Dominicatus Regis }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (DOR 1 king note). Burton Bradstock is called }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Briditone Sancti Wandrigesili }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 11.}{\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 18,2\tab [Exon 28b1]
\par \tab WAREHAM ... 1 HIDE. The hide is not named, but lay in Hasler Hundred according to analysis of the Tax Returns.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 1 HIDE BELONGS; 1 PLOUGH THERE. The corresponding entry in Exon has '1 hide of land belongs, which can be ploughed [with] 1 plough, which is on this land'. There is no obvious reason (as there sometimes is; see 4
7,8 woodland note and 36,4 garden note) why the main scribe of Great Domesday failed to record the plough estimate.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 19\tab LAND OF}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  SHAFTESBURY ABBEY. A charter of King Alfred grants 100 hides to the Church of Shaftesbury, of which there lay in Dorset 20 hides at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hanlee }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
[Sixpenny Handley, 19,1] and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Gissic }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Gussage, 26,44; see 19,1 Handley note]; 10 hides at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Terente }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Tarrant Hinton, 19,8]; 15 hides at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Ywern 
}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Iwerne Minster, 19,7] and 15 at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Funtemel }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
[Fontmell Magna, 19,4]. Iwerne Minster is 18 hides in Domesday (see 19,7 Iwerne note), otherwise the hidages are the same. The charter is in Birch, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cartularium Saxonicum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , nos. 531-532 (= Robertson,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. XIII, pp. 24-25, 284-86 = }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Early Charters of Wessex}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 212 p. 165 = Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 357); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 42. Three surveys of Shaftesbury Abbey lands, dating from the twelfth century, in British 
Library, Harley 61, folios 37r-52v, 55v (or 54v)-89r, can usefully be compared with Domesday Dorset. The abbey also held land in Purse Caundle, not mentioned in Domesday; see 15,1 Caundle note.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par \tab \tab }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this chapter.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 19,1\tab [SIXPENNY] HANDLEY. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 87; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 31, 39. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Hanlege }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 to which the name of the hundred has been added. Sixpenny, now represented by Sixpenny farm (ST8416) near Pen Hill in the parish of Fontmell Magna and by the
 adjacent Sixpenny Covert, was originally the western half of the two-part hundred of Sixpenny Handley which was surveyed as two separate hundreds in the Tax Returns. Handley has its own Tax Return and probably included Gussage St Andrew; see 26,44 Gussag
e note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 19,2\tab HINTON [ST MARY]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in [Sturminster] Newton Hundred in 1086 as it did later. 6 \'bd
 of its 8 hides, however, paid tax in Handley Hundred which consisted entirely of Shaftesbury lands. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 87, and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. pp. 37, 42, 56, record this holding in [Sturminster] Newton Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 19,3\tab STOUR. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The Shaftesbury lands no doubt encompassed both East Stour and West Stour. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Sture Cosin }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (see F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 16) is held from the Abbess of Shaftesbury in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 22, in Gillingham and Redlane Hundred; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 40. Part of the land may have been at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Liland' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (now Nyland); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 8.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 19,4\tab FONTMELL [MAGNA].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  The manor can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Sixpenny Hundred; see 19,7 Iwerne note.}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Fontemel }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
is a holding of the Abbess of Shaftesbury}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Sixpenny Handley Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 39.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab Fontmell Parva has a different history, being a part of Child Okeford parish in Gillingham and Redlane Hundred.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 19,5\tab COMPTON [ABBAS]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The manor can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Sixpenny Hundred; see 19,7 Iwerne note. It was form
erly known as Compton Abbas East to distinguish it from Compton Abbas West, now West Compton (12,3).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 19,6\tab MELBURY [ABBAS].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  The manor can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Sixpenny Hundred; see 19,7 Iwerne note. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Melebury }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is a holding 
of the Abbess of Shaftesbury}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Sixpenny Handley Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 50.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab It was also sometimes known as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Mel}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 e}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 bury Abbatissae}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 'Abbess' Melbury': F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 27.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 19,7\tab IWERNE MINSTER. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The place is named from the River Iwerne (see \{Introduction: Places Named from Rivers\}and 30,3 Ranston note) but distinguished as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Euneminstre }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
by Domesday. In Alfred's grant the hidage is 15 and that number is implied by the Tax Return for Sixpenny Hundred. The excess 3 hides may have lain south of the village in Pimperne Hundred where in the Tax Return the Abbess of Shaftesbury has 1 hide and 
\'bd virgate in lordship, not otherwise accounted for.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Ywerne}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  is a holding of the Abbess of Shaftesbury}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Sixpenny Handley Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 30.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab IN IWERNE MINSTER WOODLAND ... . The main scribe of Great Domesday added this in the space at the end of 19,8, and directed it with transposition signs to its correct position in 19,7.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 19,8\tab TARRANT [HINTON]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 For King Alfred's grant, see DOR 19 Shaftesbury note. There is a separate grant of 12 hides at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Terenta }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
by King Athelstan (924-939) to the nuns of Shaftesbury; see Birch, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cartularium Saxonicum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 708 (= }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Early Charters of Wessex}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 168 no. 581 = Sawyer, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 429). The affix Hinton is Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 higna-tun }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
('farm of the monastic community'). The lordship land is accounted for in the Tax Return for 'Langeburgh' Hundred. Later, Tarrant Hinton was in Pimperne Hundred; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. pp. 1, 27, 46. In 1086 and later, an outlying part of the manor, 1 hide, lay adjacent to Pimperne itself; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 87; Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 315; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 140. It is now represented by Hyde farm (ST906093) in a part of Pimperne parish transferred from Tarrant Hinton parish in 1933; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 120.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 19,9\tab FIFEHEAD [ST QUINTIN].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  'Fifehead' means 'five hides', other examples being 27,1 and 40,6. This Fifehead can be identi
fied from an analysis of the Tax Return for [Sturminster] Newton Hundred, but the land seems to have been alienated from the church some time after 1086 and become a part of the honour of Gloucester and so of Cranborne Hundred; see 8,1 hides note. Various
 members of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Sancto Quintino }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 family hold }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Fifhyde }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and its constituents }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Belle }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Chaldewelle }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from that honour in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 750, and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 27, 39, 46. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Belle }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Chaldewelle }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 later fused to become the parish of Belchalwell (ST7909) w
hich long contained Fifehead St Quintin. More recently, however, Fifehead St Quintin has been part of Fifehead Neville parish (see 40,6) and so, notionally, of Pimperne Hundred; and the remainder of Belchalwell parish has been absorbed by Okeford Fitzpain
e, [Sturminster] Newton Hundred; see F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 46, 53; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 95; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Dorset Survey}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 p. 135; and \{Introduction: Tithings\}.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 53, gives 1920 as the date of the remova
l of Fifehead St Quintin from Belchalwell parish to Fifehead Neville parish. The date is in fact 1884, when Belchalwell Ancient Parish was abolished for civil purposes; see Youngs, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Local Administrative Units}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, i. p. 106.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 19,10\tab KINGSTON.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  In Corfe parish, also called Kingston }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Abbatissae}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 87; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 44; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, i. p. 15. An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in two hundreds: 3 hides, less \'bc virgate, of}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 lordship in Ailwood (later Rowbarrow) Hundred, and 1 hide, less 6 acres, in Hasler Hundred; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 142. The holding seems to have included }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Blachenewell }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Blashenwell in Corfe, SY9580] and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Enecumbe }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
[Encombe in Corfe parish, SY9478], also a detached portion at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Harn }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Arne, now a separate parish, formerly in Holy Trinity parish}{\insrsid9113064 , }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wareham, SY9788]; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 23.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab THE REST OF THIS ENTRY and all of 19,11 were added by the main scribe of Great Domesday below the bottom marginal ruling of folio 78d (with the exception of the }{\f823\cf1\insrsid9113064 
first line), and some 3 letters into the central margin. Transposition signs in the shape of a upsilon (\'f8), not the 'hands' that Farley printed, indicate the position of this addition in the text above. There is no sign}{\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 that the scribe intended to add details of population, resources and value to 19,11,}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 probably because these are to be found in the fiefs of Aiulf and of Hugh's wife.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WAREHAM CASTLE. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 castellum Warham}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 now Corfe Castle (SY9582). The }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 91,}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 records that Shaftesbury Abbey holds the advowson of Gillingham church 'in exchange for the land where Corfe Castle is situated' (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 in escambium pro terra ubi castellum de corf'}{
\i\cf1\up6\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 positum est}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 );}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, i. p. 11. The reason for the original omission of this detail may be}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 that the scribe thought it had been included in the return for the king's lands, or perhaps}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
information on this exchange came in late.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WILLIAM OF BRAOSE HAS 1 VIRGATE. This detail may have been omitted from the}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 main part of the Kingston entry because the scribe was unsure whether to include it under}{\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 William of Braose's fief in DOR 37.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 19,11\tab FOR THE ADDITION OF THIS ENTRY, see 19,10 entry note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab FARNHAM}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  ... AIULF AND HUGH SON OF GRIP'S WIFE. The hide is divided between}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Aiulf the chamberlain (49,17) and the wife of Hugh (55,21), though in those entries Aiulf and}{
\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hugh's wife are tenants-in-chief, not subtenants. This entry may have been added later as}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 part of an attempt by Shaftesbury to recover the land in Farnham by info
rming the Domesday}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Commissioners that the hide was only leased to Aiulf and Hugh's wife. The abbey}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 succeeded in recovering Aiulf's \'bd hide; see 49,8 Farnham note.}{
\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab AIULF [* THE CHAMBERLAIN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 19,12\tab STOKE [WAKE]. T}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 he land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Hilton (later Whiteway)}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred. It is held by Shaftesbury Abbey in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 13, and by John Wake from}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Shaftesbury in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ix. (Edward III) no. 117.}
{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 19,13\tab MAPPERTON. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Originally granted by King Edmund (939-946) as 11 }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 mansae }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 at}{\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Mapeldertune}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 : Birch, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cartularium Saxonicum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 781 (= }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Early Charters of Wessex}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 169 no. 586 = Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, no. 490). It can be located by an analysis of the Tax Return for Charborough Hundred. It will have contained West Almer; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 87; Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 495.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab PASTURE AND WOODLAND, BETWEEN THEM ... The Latin is }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 int}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 er}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\f827\cf1\insrsid9113064  pastur\'e2 7 silu\'e2}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ...;
}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 the}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 pasture was mixed in with the woodland, the whole measuring 11 furlongs by 11 furlongs. Compare the term }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 silua pastilis}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064  ('pasturable woodland') which is frequently found in the counties of the east Midlands and elsewhere. That combines the two resources, pasture and woodland; see NTT 1,1 woodland note. Compare WOR 8,6 wood note.}{\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\insrsid9113064 19,14\tab CHESELBOURNE. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Sometimes called Long Cheselbourne to distinguish it from 'Little Cheselbourne' (55,3). It can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Hilton (later Whiteway)}{\insrsid9113064  }
{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred and is held by the Abbess of Shaftesbury in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 87, and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 13. The}{\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 land was granted as 16 }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 cassati }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 given by King Cnut (1016-1035) to his thane Agemund: Kemble, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Codex Diplomaticus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 730 (= }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Early Charters of Wessex}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 619 p. 176 = Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 955).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab LAND [FOR [***] PLOUGHS]. There is a gap of only two letters' width after }{\i\f827\cf1\insrsid9113064 T'ra \'e7}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
. The main scribe of Great Domesday obviously intended to write into the margin when the information became available. Compare 11,13 land note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WRIT. Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 breuis}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 an alternative and rarer form of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 breue}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 both originally derived from the}{\insrsid9113064  Latin }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 adjective meaning 'short', 'brief'. Here it has its more common meaning of the king's writ,}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
but in Domesday it can also mean 'return', referring to the returns made by landholders and the}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 king of their fiefs (for example, WOR X 2-3). See Galbraith, 'The Making of Domesday Book', pp. 171-75.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab MELCOMBE [HORSEY]}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  WHICH THE KING STILL HOLDS. See 1,30.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab `PIDDLE'.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\insrsid9113064 Domesday }{\i\insrsid9113064 Pidele}{\insrsid9113064 . It was left unidentified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 83 no. 138, but identified by }{
\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{\insrsid9113064  as one or more of Tolpuddle, Athelhampton, Piddlehinton and Bardolfeston. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The land was probably the 10 }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 cassati }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 granted by Wyn
flaed grandmother of King Edgar to the Church of All Saints, Shaftesbury, in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Uppidelen }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (Birch, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cartularium Saxonicum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 1186 = }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Early Charters of Wessex}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 607 p. 173 = Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 744), which Finberg in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Early Charters of Wessex}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  id
entifies as part of Piddletrenthide.}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The land is said in Domesday to be held by the Count of Mortain. The only 'Piddle' held by him}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
and of sufficient size is Piddlehinton (see 26,20 Piddlehinton note) granted by him to the monks of}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Marmoutier.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 20\tab LAND OF WILTON ABBEY. No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this chapter.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 20,1\tab DIDLINGTON. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Canedone'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred. The 6 hides probably originated in the grant of Edwy (}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Eadwig}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ),}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  '}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 King of Albion' (955-959) to his nobleman Alfred (Birch, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cartularium Saxonicum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 958 = }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Early Charters of Wessex}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 599 p. 171 = Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, no. 609) and will have consisted of 5 hides at Didlington and 1 hide at Uddens (SO0402) in Holt parish. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 14, the Abbess of Wilton holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dudelyngton }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Badbury Hundred with which 'Canedone'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 had been merged.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 20,2\tab WIMBORNE [ST GILES].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  The land was at 'Philipston' (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Felipston'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 held by the Abbess of Wilton in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 426; it is }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Phelipeston }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Knowlton Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 28. It survives as a field name 'Upper Philipston' and 'Lower Philipston' on the 1839 Tithe map of Wimborne St Giles parish (SU027108); see Taylor, 'Lost Dorset Placenames', pp. 210-211; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, iii. p. 83 note 32; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 266. An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that the land lay in Knowlton Hundred in 1086.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 21\tab LAND OF LA TRINITE OF CAEN. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this chapter.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab This nunnery was founded }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 c}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 . 1066 by Queen Matilda.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 21,1\tab HOLDS. In the manuscript and Farley }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ten' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; the Ordnance Survey facsimile fails to reproduce the abbreviation sign clearly. Compare DOR 23 Montivilliers note.}{\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab TARRANT [LAUNCESTON].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  This }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Tarente }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 can b
e identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Langeburgh' Hundred. For the grant of this manor and others in 1082 to the Abbey of La Trinit\'e9, Caen, see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 i. no. 149, and Round, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Documents}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  France}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 141 no. 422 and p. 143 no. 427. The abbey's holding here appears as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Tarente de Lowyheston }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 1, in Pimperne Hundred and as }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Tarent' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Langeburgh }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 87. Part of the adjacent Tarrant Monkton may have been inv
olved in it; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 184b.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab BRICTRIC [* SON OF ALGAR *].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Probably Brictric son of Algar; see 1,17 Brictric note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VILLAGERS. According to the Tax Return for 'Langeburgh' Hundred the king has not had tax from the 6 hides and 4 acres which the villagers of the Abbess of Caen hold.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 22\tab IN THE LANDHOLDERS' LIST on folio 75a this chapter and the next (DOR 23) are reversed, L22 being the Abbess of Montivilliers and L23 being the Canons of Coutances.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab LAND OF THE CANONS OF COUTANCES CHURCH.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  This is their only holding in England recorded in Domesday.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this chapter.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 22,1\tab WINTERBORNE [STICKLAND].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  This 'Winterborne' can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Hundesburge'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 43; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 178b. In the confirmation charter of Herbert, Bishop of Salisbury (1194-1217), to the Canons of Coutances it is }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Winterburn Stikellane}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; see Round, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Documents}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  France}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 344 no. 966; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 178b; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Miscellaneous}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. no. 1602. In the adjacent village of Quarleston lies a Normandy farm, which might recall the Coutances holding; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 132; F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 63.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 23\tab LAND [OF THE CHURCH] OF SAINTE-MARIE, MONTIVILLIERS. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 monasterium villare }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('monastery on a country estate, or at a place there called Villare'), Old French }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Mouti}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 er}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 villier}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 s}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ),}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
is Montivilliers near Le Havre in the d\'e9partement of Seine-Maritime, France. See Longnan }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Noms de Lieux}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 353; Dauzat and Rostaing, }{\i\insrsid9113064 Dictionnaire des Noms de Lieux en France}{
\insrsid9113064 ,}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  p. 463, under }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Monast\'e8re}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab For the order of this chapter in the Landholders' List, see DOR 22 Landholders' note.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this chapter.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 23,1\tab MONTIVILLIERS. In the manuscript and Farley }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VILLAR'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; the Ordnance Survey facsimile does not reproduce the abbreviation sign. Compare 21,1 holds note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab WADDON.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Broad Waddon, held as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Brodewaddon' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in 'Uggescombe' Hundred of the fee of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Mustervilers}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 93; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 7. It is also called Friar Waddon or Waddon Monks from the holding of Netley Abbey which acquired the land from the Abbey of Montivilliers.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab HUGH SON OF GRIP}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  GAVE THIS LAND TO THIS CHURCH. A copy of a charter granting Waddon to the church of Sainte-Marie, Montivilliers, appears in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Gallia Christiana }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
(2nd edition) vol. xi Appendix col. 329 E. The grant is said to have been made by }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hawise }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Haduidis}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ),}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 the daughter
 of Nicholas de }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Baschelvilla }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and wife of Hugh of Wareham (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Varham}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
son of Grip, on the advice and with the consent of her husband for the sake of her soul and those of her husband and friends, with King William's assent, in the presence of various barons
, including Bishop Odo, Earl Roger (of Montgomery), Walter Giffard, Geoffrey Martel (Hugh's brother) etc.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab CHURCH TAXES. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Circscez}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 plural (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 circset }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 singular), also }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 circieti }
{\cf1\insrsid9113064 plural: Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ciric-sceat}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 An obscure tax; see Maitland, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Domesday Book and Beyond}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, pp. 321-22. It was due in kind and payable at Martinmas; see WOR 9,7 and the quotation from the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Rectitudines Singularum Personarum }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 on the duties and rights of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 cotsetla }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 in 1,8 cottagers note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 24\tab LAND OF THE KING'S ALMSMEN. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The Landholders' List on folio 75a has 'Reinbald the priest and other clerics' at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 XXIIII}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab In Exon the first three entries are found in the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dominicatus Regis}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see DOR 1 king note.}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
No doubt they were originally recorded separately as well (together with 24,4-5, for which 
no Exon at all survives, and probably 18,1-2) under the heading 'Lands given in alms in Dorset', like the entries for SOM 16, and these entries in the king's land are merely cross-references.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab All the six churches listed (24,1-3) have been awarded from royal land (1,4;2;6;8;12;11 respectively), as is the case of some of the churches in SOM 16 ('What the King's Clerics [hold]').}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 24,1\tab [Exon 27b2]
\par \tab BRICTWARD THE PRIEST. Probably the same man as Brictward the priest who in 1086 held the church of Bedwyn in WIL l,23j.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 24,2\tab [Exon 28a2]}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \'bd PLOUGH THERE. In the corresponding entry in Exon Bolla has it; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 in dominio }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 omitted, perhaps in error.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 24,4\tab REINBALD THE PRIEST. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Reinbald, or Regenbald, was also called Reinbald of Cirencester (BRK 61) and in 1130 Alfred of Lincoln paid 60 silver marks to have the manor of Pulham 'from the honour of Cirencester' (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pipe Roll (1130)}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 16), of which church he was dean or provost, according to Leland }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Itinerary}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  (Toulmin Smith,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
i. p. 128). Reinbald was probably also the first chancellor of England (see HEF 1,46 for this title) and held land in Somerset, Wiltshire, Gloucestershire, Herefordshire, Berkshire, and Buckinghamshire. See Round, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal England}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 421-30; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 i. pp. xiii, xv; Stevenson, 'Charter of William the Conqueror', p. 731 note.}{\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab PULHAM. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 This land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Buckland [Newton] Hundred and is probably a separate village from 36,4 (see 36,4 Pulham note) which was in 'Hundesburge'}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred. It is possibly West Pulham; see Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 735. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 42, the land is held by the Abbot of Cirencester.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab IN LORDSHIP; [***]. The gap of about 11 letters' width in the manuscript was presumably left for details of the ploughs in lordship. Compare 1,26 villagers note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 24,5\tab WALTER THE DEACON.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 diacon' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is only partially visible, due to the parchment's being sc
raped rather messily here, perhaps as a result of ink being spilt.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab `CERNE'. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cernel}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
. It appears that this 3-hide holding is needed to complete the sum of the hides in the Tax Return for "Stana" Hundred. If so, it will have lain on the upper reaches of the river and may have been at Godmanstone (SY6697); so Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dorset Survey}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 133-34, although he included it in 'Modbury' Hundred. The 3 hides with the 22 hides of Cerne Abbas (11,1) will have made a 25-hide unit.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par \tab \tab This place was left unidentified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 84 no. 147, but identified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer }{\insrsid9113064 (following Eyton) as Godmanstone.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab THERE IS A GAP of about 13 lines after this entry, presumably left for further details of}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 land held in alms to be added when and if available.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 25\tab COUNT ALAN.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Count of Brittany and Earl of Richmond (Yorkshire); m
arried to Constance, King William's daughter. He held much land in the north, also in Cambridgeshire, Hampshire, Hertfordshire, Northamptonshire, Nottinghamshire etc.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this chapter.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 25,1\tab DEWLISH. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 It can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Puddletown Hundred, but was later sometimes included in Whiteway Hundred as explained in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 16.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab BRICTRIC [* SON OF ALGAR *].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Probably Brictric son of Algar because Dewlish was later part of the honour of Gloucester (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 93) and Brictric's lands formed the nucleus of that honour; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 31. Also Count Alan had been a prot\'e9g\'e9
 of Queen Matilda who had possession of most of Brictric's lands (see 1,17 Brictric note).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 26\tab COUNT OF MORTAIN. Robert, half-brother of King William and younger brother of Bishop Odo of Bayeux. He held more land in England than any other follower of King William (see Freeman, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
History of the Norman Conquest}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iv. p. 762), especially in Cor
nwall and other south-west counties. According to the summary of his fief in Dorset, Devon, Cornwall and Wiltshire on Exon folio 531a3 he held 623 manors. He was the greatest lay landholder in Dorset after the king. He was responsible for the 'removal' of
 
numerous parts of manors, illegally in many cases, and for the cessation of payment of various customary dues owed to royal manors in Somerset and Devon. In the 'exchanges' he made of manors he invariably got the better bargain (for example, 56,36 and SOM
 
19,86 which relates to Dorset). After rebelling against William Rufus in 1088, he was reconciled and died in 1091. When his fief escheated to the king, many of his tenants became tenants-in-chief, their lands forming separate baronies. Later fees or holdi
ngs are described as of Morton, Montague or Montacute; among principal later holders are the}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Beauchamps. Mortain is in the d\'e9partement of Manche, France.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this chapter.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,1\tab [BUCKHORN] WESTON.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  This }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Westone }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is held as a Mortain fee in Gillingham Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 91, and as }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bokeres Westone }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 21, 32.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab JOINTLY. Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 in parag}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 io}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 here and elsewhere in Domesday Dorset, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 pariter }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Exon, is a form of land}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 tenure whereby a man's estate was not physically divided among his heirs, often his}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
children (as probably in 26,37 and 30,3), but enjoyed equally by them, with one heir}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 being responsible to the lord and king for the services due from the land and the other}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
heirs being answerable only to the first, thus preserving the unity of the manor. See }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. pp. 34-35, on the advantages of this type of tenure. Sometimes, as in Devon 16,7, it}{\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 was not a man's sons or daughters who shared the manor. Moreover, there are numerous}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 cases of just one person, often a thane, holding land 'jointly' (for example, 55,42;44-46), for which}{
\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see SOM \{Introduction: Exon Extra Information and Discrepancies}{\insrsid9113064 \}}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and DEV 1,15 thane note. In Dorset there are no occurrences of the phrase in the accounts of
 the king's land or of church land (though it appears there regularly in Devon), but some 27 occurrences thereafter, mostly in DOR 26 and DOR 55. The words }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 in parag' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 are interlined in all but 4 cases}{
\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (where they are written at the end of a line, perhaps la
ter; see 27,6 jointly note). There is some evidence to suggest that they were added when a check was made of the Exon manuscript where the phrase appears more frequently than in Domesday; see DEV 15,47 jointly note. The importance of knowing the way in wh
i
ch a manor was held in 1066 cannot be stressed too much when so many lands were acquired unlawfully: perhaps the reason why the phrase occurs so often in the fiefs of the two greatest land-thieves in Dorset: the Count of Mortain (DOR 26) and Hugh son of G
rip (DOR 55). The phrases }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 pariter / libere / poterat ire ad quemlibet dominum / pro uno manerio / pro duobus maneriis }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
appear to be interchangeable in Domesday and Exon (see DEV 1,15 thane note for examples) and in Dorset all but two occurrences of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 libere }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and some of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 pro duobus maneriis }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 are interlineations or marginal insertions, again suggesting the result of a check. Because so many of those who held 'jointly' are described as 'thanes' who were by their position free to choose whichever lord they would, it 
would seem that joint tenure implied free tenure and the land thus held possibly then having the status of a }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 manerium}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 rather than a mere piece of land.}{
\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,2\tab NYLAND. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Gillingham Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab DROGO [* OF MONTACUTE *]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Drogo of Montacute: he gave 2 hides in Nyland to Shaftesbury Abbey when his daughter became a nun there; see the confirmation charter of 1121 x 1122 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ii. pp. 346-47 no. clv (Calendar no. 1347).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,3\tab HANFORD. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in Farrington Hundred in 1086. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hanford }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
in Gillingham Hundred (which absorbed Farrington Hundred) is a Mortain fee in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 91; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 22. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 425, there is a Mortain fee at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Lathirton' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Lazerton; see 30,3 Ranston note and 56,32 Lazerton note] which may have been part of this land.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,4\tab [CHILD] OKEFORD. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 This land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Farrington Hundred. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 22, 33, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Chyldakford }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is a Mortain fee in Gillingham Hundred (which absorbed Farrington Hundred after 1086). The 2 mills shared with the king (1,7; see 26,4 mills note) support the identification.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab HALF OF 2 MILLS WHICH PAYS 10s. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Redd' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 here must have as its subject }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 medietas}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
as, according to Exon, the king has the other half of the value of the 2 mills at 20s, recorded in 1,7.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 26,5\tab `CERNE'. The order of Domesday suggests that this entry and 26,8-11 formed a group of holdings named from the River Cerne and}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
lying in Dorchester (later St George) Hundred. Most of 26,8-11 can certainly be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Dorchester Hundred. Mortain fees are later found at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Fosardeston' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Forston] in }
{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 425, held of the honour of Odcombe, and in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 18; at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Haringston' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
[Herrison], held by Philip }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hareng }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 425 (see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 18); and at }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pulleinston' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Pulston], held by John }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pulein }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 424 (see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 17, 31). In the Red Book of the Exchequer (Hall, ii. p. 218) Bernard }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pullus }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cerna Pulli }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
from the honour of Montacute in St George Hundred. The honour o
f Odcombe is formed later around the Domesday holdings of Ansger; thus either 26,8 or 26,11 will have been at Forston. In the Montacute Cartulary, among the grants by Count William of Mortain, son of Count Robert, frequent mention is made of 'the three }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cernels}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 '}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 perhaps implying these three villages; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 i. pp. 180-81 nos. 1367-68; and 26,44 Gussage note. But there was also a Mortain interest in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wolfeton }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Wolfeton in Charminster parish (1,4 Dorchester note), now represented b
y Wolfeton Clump, SY6995, Wolfeton House, SY6792, and Wolfeton Eweleaze, SY6893] held from Cecilia }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Bello Campo }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 31 (see 26,6 Bhompston note); also at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cherleton }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Charlton in Charminster parish (1,4 Dorchester note), SY6895], where two Mortain fees are held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 752. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 18, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cherleton' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 paid its tax with Herrison and it is held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 31, from Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Martin }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 who also holds Pulston.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 26,6\tab BHOMPSTON. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Frome}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\insrsid9113064 It was identified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 
, iii. p. 84 no. 156, as Bhompston Farm (in Stinsford) and by }{\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{\insrsid9113064  as Frome Billet and Frome Whitfield. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The two holdings at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Frome }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
(26,6;12) together formed a 5-hide unit and may well have involved several villages along the River Frome. In later times there was Mortain land at Bhompston in Stinsford parish in St George Hundred, earlier }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Frome Bonevileston }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 17), a half fee held by John }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Wytefeld }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from John }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Quintin }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and he from John 
}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Bello Campo }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 17; in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 31, it is held under Glastonbury Abbey. It is held as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Frome }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 by Philip }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Quintyn }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Bello Campo }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in 
}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 1468; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. (Edward I) no. 609, and vii
i (Edward III) no. 470. The larger of these 'Frome' holdings (26,6) seems later to have been known as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Styntesford }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Stinsford] held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 31, as 1 fee by Walter }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Haddon }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from Cecilia }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Bello Campo }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (and by her from Glastonbury); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calend
ar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, vii (Edward III) no. 431, and viii (Edward III) no. 470. In Domesday, Stinsford is a name applied to two other holdings (52,1. 56,40). Neither 26,6 nor 26,12 can be located in any Tax Return hundred, but they fall in a group
 of places in Cullifordtree Hundred and Dorchester (later St George) Hundred in the order of the text.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,7\tab ROBERT [* SON OF IVO *]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Perhaps Robert son of Ivo, a subtenant of the Count of Mortain in several of his Somerset manors and his constable (possibly of Montacute Castle, see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
VCH Somerset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 427; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Somerset Survey}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
i. p. 97). The Tax Return for Cullifordtree Hundred states that the king has not had tax from \'bd hide he holds from the count. However, that holding could be 'Wey' (26,16).}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab STAFFORD. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Stanford}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
It is in a group of places in Dorchester (later St George) Hundred. The Domesday holdings are probably represented by the modern West Stafford parish (subsequently in}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Cullifordtree Hundred). 'East Stafford' is a lost place in West Knighton parish; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 209. See 27,4 Mayne note and 55,8 Stafford note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,8\tab ANSGER [* OF MONTACUTE *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab `CERNE'. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 26,5 'Cerne' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab FREELY. See 26,1 jointly note on the correspondence between }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 libere }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 in paragio }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 etc.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,9\tab RALPH [* THE CLERIC *]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Probably Ralph the cleric, from whom the king has not had tax from the 2 hides and 1 virgate he holds from the Count of Mortain in the Tax Return for Dorchester Hundred.}{
\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab `CERNE'. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 26,5 'Cerne' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 2 FRENCHMEN WHO SERVE. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Seruientes francig'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; similarly in WOR 8,11. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Seruientes }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is probably being used in the sense of }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 faciebant seruitium }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 'did service' (see WOR 8,9b;14), rather than implying land held by serjeanty, on which see LEC 13,63 Frenchmen note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab MEADOW, 3 ACRES. Originally written }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .ii. a'c}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 but corrected to }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 iii. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 by the addition of a }
{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 i}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  at the beginning, covering the original }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 punctus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,10\tab `CERNE'.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  See 26,5 'Cerne' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,11\tab ANSGER [* OF MONTACUTE *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab `CERNE'.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  See 26,5 'Cerne' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,12\tab BRETEL [* "DE SANCTO CLARO" *].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Bretel here and elsewhere in this chapter may be Bretel of Saint-Clair (see Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 112): in the Tax
 Return for the Somerset Hundred of 'Bulstone' (Exon 526b1) the king has no tax from \'bd hide which }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 britell}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 us}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  de s}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
[}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 an}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 c}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 t}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 o claro}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  holds. This \'bd
 hide can be identified as Swell (SOM 19,15), held by Bretel from the Count of Mortain. A Bretel was also the cou
nt's subtenant on many of his manors in Somerset and Devon. See 26,28 Littleton note. For a different identification, see CON 5,13,10 Bretel note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab BHOMPSTON. Domesday }{\i\insrsid9113064 Frome}{\insrsid9113064 . It was identified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 85 no. 160, as Bhompston Farm (in Stinsford) and by }{\i\insrsid9113064 
Domesday Gazetteer}{\insrsid9113064  as Frome Billet and Frome Whitfield. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 26,6 Bhompston note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,13\tab ROBERT. Perhaps Robert the constable; see 26,13 'Winterborne' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab `WINTERBORNE'.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\insrsid9113064 Domesday}{\i\insrsid9113064  Wintreburne}{\insrsid9113064 . It was left unidentified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 85 no. 161, but identified by }
{\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{\insrsid9113064  as Winterborne St Martin.
\par \tab \tab }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The nine places called 'Winterborne' held by the Count of Mortain (26,13;18-19;30-31;33-34;36;48) are difficult to identify. Only one (26,36) can be located with certain
ty (in Combsditch Hundred) by an analysis of the Tax Returns. In the case of the others, the order of entries gives some indication. Thus 26,13;18-19 seem to fall in a group of places in Dorchester Hundred or Cullifordtree Hundred, and therefore lie on th
e
 River South Winterborne; 26,30-31;33-34 are probably in a group of places in Combsditch Hundred and thus on the eastern River Winterborne, while 26,48 falls before Bestwall which is identifiable from an analysis of the Tax Return for Bere Hundred and pro
bably also lay in that hundred.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab In the early feudal documents, Mortain or Beauchamp lands are found in St George Hundred (the successor to Dorchester Hundred) at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wynterborn Seint Martyn }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
[Martinstown; see 55,1 Martinstown note], a holding which also included }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 La Rewe }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Rew, SY6389]; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. (Edward I) no. 481, viii. (Edward III) no. 470, ix. (Edward III) no. 190. In the last two cases, the holder is John }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Bello Campo }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and it is to the Beauchamps of Hatch Beauchamp (in So
merset) that the lands of Robert (if he is Robert the constable) descend. This probably represents Robert's 1 hide of 26,13.
\par \tab \tab In Cullifordtree Hundred, Mortain lands lay at Winterborne }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Germain }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Winterborne}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Farringdon in Winterborne Came] and at Winterborne }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Harang }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Winterborne Herringston,}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 also called Winterborne }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Beauchamp}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ], both held by the Beauchamp family in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 751,}{\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 19-20, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. (Edward I) no. 609, viii. (Edward III) no. 470; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. pp. 262, 265; Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 521. In }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 1468, a list of the lands of Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Bello Campo}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Blaunch' }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 holds one-third fee in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 South' Wynterburne }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Dorset, and Philip }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Germain }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 holds 1 fee in the same vill, that is probably in Winterborne }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Germain, }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 that is, Winterborne Farringdon. These lands are likely to account for 26,18-19, held by Robert.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab In Combsditch Hundred are found Winterborne Clenston (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Clencheston}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 held from John }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Bello Campo}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and Anderson (Winterborne }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Fyhasse}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ):}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 29, the latter held by William }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Stokes }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (see 26,52 Stoke note) from the heirs of John }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Burgo}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 a frequent Mortain or Beauchamp tenant; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. (Edward I) nos. 142-43; Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, i. p. 160. Some or all of the land in Winterborne Clenston may have been in 'Winterborne Phelpston' [a lost place in this parish: }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 80], possibly named from Philip, son of William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Wynterburne}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 who holds in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 1469, from Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Beauchamp}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Some may also have been at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Winterborn Nichole }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Winterborne Nicholston: }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 79], held by John }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Bello Campo }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. (Edward I)
 no. 609 and viii. (Edward III) no. 470. Also in Combsditch Hundred there was Mortain land at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Winterborn Wytchurche }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Winterborne Whitechurch] and at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wynterborn Watecombe }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Whatcombe in Winterborne Whitechurch, ST8301; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 84], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 44, and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , viii. (Edward III) no. 470. These will account for the lands of 26,30-31;33-34, those of 26,30-31 held by Robert in 1086 being no doubt the lands later held by the Beauchamps.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab Finally, in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 751, Winterborne }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Musters }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Muston] in Bere Hundred is held from Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
de Bello Campo }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and may account for 26,48 (see 40,4 'Winterborne' note). In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 1468, it is held from Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Beauchamp }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
by William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Wytefeld }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and from him by William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Monasterio }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Moutiers }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Musters}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Est Wynterburne juxta Warham}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Further, in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 43, the Abbess of Tarrant holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Turbervileston }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Winterborne Muston]; she likewise holds Gussage (26,44), Hanford (26,3) and Studland (26,61) f
rom Mortain. Winterborne Muston with the holdings of 55,12 and 57,10 formed a five-hide unit.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,14\tab `WEY'.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  See 1,22 and \{Introduction: Places Named from Rivers\}. The Mortain lands certainly included }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Waye Hamondevill }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Upwey: }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 246] in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , viii. (Edward III) no. 470, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Waywestbrok }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
[now Westbrook in Upwey, SY6684] in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 38, and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Waye Rewald }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ['Rowaldsway', lost in Broadwey] in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 19; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 200. The latter holding is identified by Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 479, and Taylor, 'Lost Dorset Placenames', p. 215, with Causeway farm (SY6581). The fact that one of the subtenants of 'Rowaldsway' in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 19, is Geoffrey }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
de Wermewell }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 may suggest that both 'Wey' and Warmwell (26,57) had the same 1086 holders: a Robert holds both Warmwell and 'Wey' (26,16). William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cruket}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 who is a later Mortain tenant at Holwell (26,17), may have named 'Creketway' in Broadwey; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 38; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, i. p. 200. The salt-houses of 26,15 may suggest a coastal or tidal site such as Weymouth, but see Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 420.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }\pard\plain \s20\ql \fi-1080\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin1080\itap0\pararsid1786625 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\insrsid9113064 \tab SHEERWOLD <OF GOTHERS>. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
The name Sheerwold occurs 14 times in Domesday Book o
r Exon, four times as the predecessor of the Count of Mortain in Cornwall (CON 5,24,10), Dorset (26,14;54), and Somerset (SOM 19,1). In 1086 he continued to hold Gothers from the count. The Mortain manor in Somerset is adjacent to William of Mohun's manor
 
of Leigh, held by Sheerwold in 1066; and the two Devon manors of Sheerwold held by Haimeric of Arques and Odo son of Gamalin in 1086 lay on the route from Gothers to the Mortain manors in Somerset and Dorset. It seems likely that all these properties had 
b
een held by one individual in 1066. There are no apparent links with the remaining holdings in Somerset, Gloucestershire and Wiltshire; but given the rarity of the name and its restricted distribution, it is possible that all were held by the same individ
ual in 1066. }{\insrsid9113064 See also Keats-Rohan, }{\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday People}{\insrsid9113064 , p. 421 (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }\pard\plain \ql \fi-1080\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\faauto\rin0\lin1080\itap0\pararsid1786625 \fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 {\cf1\insrsid9113064 26,15\tab HOLDS. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ten}{
\i\cf1\up6\insrsid9113064 o}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 instead of the usual }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ten' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 which Farley printed, presumably in correction.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab `WEY'. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 26,14 'Wey' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab SALT-HOUSES. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Salinae }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
comprehend all kinds of salt-workings from coastal pans, as here, to the boilers of Worcestershire and Cheshire, with their associated sheds and buildings. 'Salt-house' is the most comprehensive term. See WOR 1,3a brine-pits note and WOR 1,3a }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 hocci}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  note on salt extraction. In Dorset there were three areas of salt production: the Isle of Purbeck, the mouth of the River Wey and Lyme Regis; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, iii. pp. 22-23. The only other mention of salt-houses in Dorset is 26,61 where the Count has 32 at Studland. Salt-workers are mentioned at 8,6. 12,13. 26,67. 57,14.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,16\tab ROBERT [* SON OF IVO *]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 26,7 Robert note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab `WEY'.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  See 26,14 'Wey' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,17\tab BRETEL. See 26,12 Bretel note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab HOLWELL.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Halwell }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hallewolle }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is a Mortain land held by William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cruket }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
in Cullifordtree Hundred: }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 19, 38, 57.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,18\tab `WINTERBORNE'.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  On the River South Winterborne probably in Cullifordtree Hundred; see 26,13 'Winterborne' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,19\tab `WINTERBORNE'. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 On the River South Winterborne probably in Cullifordtree Hundred; see 26,13 'Winterborne' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 1 \'bd PLOUGHS, WHICH ARE THERE. Latin ... }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 q}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 uae}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  ibi s}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 un}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 t}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 normally the singular is used with }{\scaps\cf1\insrsid9113064 '1 \'bd ' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
in Domesday, as in 3,4 and 26,40 (see 26,40 paid note) and 27,2. The plural, however, also occurs in 26,39;65 and 50,1.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,20\tab ABBEY OF MARMOUTIER.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  In Tours in the d\'e9partement of Indre-et-Loire, France. It was founded in the fourth century by St Martin. Its importance gained it the name of 'the greater monastery' (}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 maioris monasterii}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 genitive). Compare the place-name Moutiers: 11,2 William note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab PIDDLEHINTON ... }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 5 HIDES ... LORDSHIP. It had belonged to Matilda, Count Robert's wife, and was granted on her death and for her soul's sake by him and by King William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 c}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 . 1082-84 to the Church of Sainte-Marie, Mortain, which belonged to the monks of Marmoutier; see Round, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Documents}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  France}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, no. 1206 p. 435 (= }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 i. p. 55 no. 204). See also }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 184a; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ii. p. 32 no. 645. The grant is of 10 hides at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pidele Hinctune}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 of which only 4 hides are to pay tax, the remaining 6 hides being in lordship. This holding can also be ide
ntified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Puddletown Hundred, which states that the Abbot of Marmoutier has 5 hides and 3 virgates in lordship from the land of the Countess (an error for 'Count') of Mortain (Piddlehinton is his only holding in this h
undred). In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 15, Piddlehinton, held by the prior of Mortain, is }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hine Pudele }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and is probably the same land as the 10 }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
cassati }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Uppidelen }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 restored to Shaftesbury Abbey in 966 by King Edgar: }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 43; see 19,14 'Piddle' note.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,21\tab HUMPHREY <OF WIGGINGTON>. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
The distribution of unidentified tenants named Humphrey is skewed in the extreme. In Great Domesday only five tenants-in-chief subinfeudated more than a single holding to a tenant of that name who cannot plausibly be id
entified from documentary sources: the Bishop of Coutances (2), Odo of Bayeux (2), the Bishop of London (2), William son of Stur (3), and the Count of Mortain (23). The Count of Mortain evidently did not have 23 tenants named Humphrey and may have had onl
y
 one. The distribution of the Mortain tenants makes this a possibility. In three counties - Buckingham, Cornwall, and Northamptonshire - all Humphreys were Mortain tenants; and in the remaining four counties with Mortain tenants named Humphrey, their dist
ribution was distinct from that of other tenants of the same name. }{\insrsid9113064 See also Keats-Rohan, }{\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday People}{\insrsid9113064 , p. 276.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab `PIDDLE'.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\insrsid9113064 Domesday }{\i\insrsid9113064 Pidele}{\insrsid9113064 . It was left unidentified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 85 no. 169, but identified by }{
\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{\insrsid9113064  as one or more of Tolpuddle, Athelhampton, Piddlehinton and Bardolfeston.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab These two holdings at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pidele }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (26,21-22)}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
appear to be needed to complete the sum of the hides in the Tax Return for Puddletown Hundred; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 130. There was later Mortain land at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pideltun}{\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 (Puddletown: }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Piretone }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pitretone }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Domesday) according to }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 93, 261, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 15, but this appears to have been an exchange since in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 93, William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Monte Acuto }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
is stated to hold a third of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pideleton' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (the rest being 1,8) in exchange for the claim his predecessors had in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Huneton' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
(Piddlehinton). The land belonging to the count's fief in 1086 seems to have lain within the parishes of Piddlehinton and Puddletown. Thus in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 426, William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
de Monte Acuto }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 holds in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Luveford}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 16, John }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
de Witefeld }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and John }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Deverel }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 hold in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pudele Loveford }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from Simon of Montacute. This is 'Lovard', a lost place lying in both parishes; see }
{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 318; Taylor, 'Lost Dorset Placenames', pp. 211-12. 'South Lovard' is probably to be identified with Higher Waterston (SY7295). One of the holders of 'Lovard' in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 35, is Richard }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Portes}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Lytle Pydle }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Little Puddle] is also}{\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 held from him by Matilda }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Deverel}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Musterston }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
[Muston farm, SY7295, in Piddlehinton, compare Winterborne Muston: 26,13 'Winterborne' note] from him by Richard }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Musters }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 35. The Deverel family will also have held and named 'Combe Deverel', an alternative name for Little Puddle; see F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 175; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 311. It is possible that Little Puddle and Muston were thus also Mortain lands, together with Druce farm in Puddletown (SY7495) named perhaps from the later Drogo of Montacute (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 316).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 1 \'bd HIDES. In the manuscript and Farley }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .i. hida 7 dim'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; the Ordnance Survey facsimile fails to reproduce the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 7 }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
which is father faint.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WHICH PAYS. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 redd'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; in}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Farley it is }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 edd'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 undoubtedly a printing error as there is a space for a letter at the beginning of the line before }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 edd'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,22\tab HUMPHREY <OF WIGGINGTON>. See 26,21 Humphrey note (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab `PIDDLE'. See 26,21 'Piddle' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab MEADOW, [1] \'bd ACRES. Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ac' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 7 }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 dimid'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see 12,16 hide note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 26,23\tab THE COUNT HOLDS. There is a black ink blot over the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 t }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ten' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
in the manuscript, identical to the one on the opposite folio (27,7 'held').}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 3 \'bd VIRGATES. In the manuscript the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .iii. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 has been corrected from }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .ii.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  by the addition of a third minim over the original }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 punctus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  at the beginning; a new }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 punctus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  was then added.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,24\tab ROBERT [* SON OF IVO? *].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 Perhaps Robert son of Ivo (on whom see 26,7 Robert note), from whom the king has never had tax on 1 virgate which he holds from the count in Charborough (later Loosebarrow) Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab MORDEN. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in Charborough (later Loosebarrow) Hundred. There was Mortain land at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 West Mourden}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 :}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , viii. (Edward III) no. 470; Morden is a fee of Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Bello Campo}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  in}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Book of Fees}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 751 (see also p. 1469). West Morden (see 41,5 Morden note) was later a tithing in the post-Domesday hundred of Rushmore, though in Morden parish; see Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, iii. p. 511; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 54, 58-59. East Morden seems to have been a part of Lytchett Matravers in 1086 (see 34,5 Lytchett note), as well as a holding of}{\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wulfric (56,13 Morden note).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab A MILL WHICH PAYS 6s 3d. Other mills at Morden are 41,5 (paying 45d) and 56,13}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (part of a mill paying 11d).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,25\tab SPETISBURY. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Charborough Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab THE COUNT HAS 1 VIRGATE. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 una v' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in error for the accusative }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 unam }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 after }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 habet}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; Farley did not correct this error (see 1,5 manor note).}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,26\tab ANSGER [* OF MONTACUTE *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab SYDLING. This 5-hide holding is probably 'Sydling Fifehead' (that is, 'Five Hides'), a tithing in Sydling St Nicholas parish; see F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 202.
 The land will have included }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Upseteling' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (Up Sydling, ST6201], a Mortain fee in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 425, held from the honour of Odcombe to which Ansger's manors descended; see 12,1 Sydling note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab EDMER [* ATOR *]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Here and elsewhere in Dorset he is probably Edmer Ator who was one of the}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Count of Mortain's predecessors in Somerset and Devon and, as plain Edmer, in Cornwall. On the byname, see DEV 15,12 Edmer note.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par \tab \tab Edmer Ator was among the wealthiest two dozen magnates in Anglo-Saxon England. He was
 the predecessor of Count Robert of Mortain in eight counties, named as such in DEV 15,31. So far as is known, only three estates in Somerset (37,5;12. 47,10) and one in Hertfordshire (HRT 19,1) in which Edmer had had an interest were in the hands of othe
r
 tenants-in-chief in 1086, though the disproportionate number of Edmer's in Devon probably means that there are unidentified Edmer Ators in that county. Elsewhere, however, Edmer's status as predecessor to the count aids identification where his byname is
 omitted, further strengthened by the fact that in five of the eight counties there were no Edmers other than the count's predecessor. See also Clarke, }{\i\insrsid9113064 English Nobility}{\insrsid9113064 
, pp. 281-82, whose list omits the Cornish holdings and SOM 37,5;12 and 47,10 (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,27\tab SYDLING. A further part of Sydling, distinguished from the previous estate (26,26) by the difference both of 1066 and 1086 holders. It was probably not 'Sydling Fifehead' or Up Sydling; }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
see 26,26 Sydling note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,28\tab BRETEL. See 26,12 Bretel note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab LITTLETON. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
This can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Combsditch Hundred. It was long in the parish of Langton Long Blandford in Pimperne Hundred, but since 1933 has been in Blandford St Mary (Combsditch Hundred). It is, however,
 included in Combsditch Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 29, where Henry }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Lytleton }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 holds from John }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Sancto Claro}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 probably a descendant of the 1086 holder, Bretel, who may thus be Bretel of Saint-Clair (see 26,12 Bretel note).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,29\tab BRETEL. See 26,12 Bretel note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab BLANDFORD [ST MARY].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\insrsid9113064 Domesday }{\i\insrsid9113064 Bleneford}{\insrsid9113064 . It was left unidentified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 
, iii. p. 86 no. 177, but identified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{\insrsid9113064  as Blandford St Mary.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Blaneford}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Bleneford}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 probably represents variously Blandford St M
ary, Langton Long Blandford and Bryanston (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 90). Blandford Forum, a further }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Blaneford}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
does not seem to be mentioned in Domesday, and was probably surveyed as part of Pimperne (1,5). Of the three other places called 'Blandford'
, Blandford St Mary lay in 1086 in Combsditch Hundred (the holdings at 34,6. 49,1 and 56,14 being locatable from an analysis of the Tax Return for that hundred), and Langton Long Blandford (the holdings at 47,4 and 56,31) can be identified from an analysi
s of the Tax Return for 'Langeburgh'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred (later absorbed by Pimperne Hundred). Bryanston (see 26,46 Bryanston note and 56,34 Bryanston note) can be placed in 'Hundesburge'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred, by an analysis of the Tax Returns. Where the Tax Returns provide no clue
, the places called 'Blandford' have to be identified from the order of the text or from later evidence. In the case of the present entry this 'Blandford' seems to lie within a group of places in Combsditch Hundred begun by Littleton (26,28); it was later
 given to Clerkenwell Priory; see Hassall, \lquote Dorset Properties of St. Mary, Clerkenwell'; Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, i. p. 163; and the Clerkenwell Cartulary, (Hassall, nos. 6, 9, 35, 37). There was also Mortain land at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Blaneford' Belet }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Langton Long Blandford] in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 752; held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 27, 43, as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Langeton' Botyler }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 by Elizabeth }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Guldene }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
who holds Littleton (26,28) in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 49; this is probably the entry at 26,37 which will have lain in 'Langeburgh' Hundred.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab IT PAYS ... VALUE WAS. See 17,1 valued note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,30\tab `WINTERBORNE'. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 On the eastern River Winterborne, possibly in Combsditch Hundred; see 26,13 'Winterborne' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,31\tab `WINTERBORNE'. Domesday}{\i\insrsid9113064  Wintreburne}{\insrsid9113064 . It was left unidentified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 86 no. 179, but identified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 
Domesday Gazetteer}{\insrsid9113064  as Winterborne Kingston. It lay on}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  the eastern River Winterborne, possibly in Combsditch Hundred; see 26,13 'Winterborne' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,32\tab RO[BERT] }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ... HIMSELF. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Ipse Ro. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 has been written over an erasure and the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Ro. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
is not absolutely clear, although 'Robert' is probably intended as the subtenant.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab `WIMBORNE'. Domesday }{\i\insrsid9113064 Winburne}{\insrsid9113064 . It was left unidentified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 86 no 180, but identified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{
\insrsid9113064  as Wimborne Minster.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,33\tab HUBERT [* OF SAINT-CLAIR *]. The count's subtenant Hubert here and in 26,39-40 is p}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 robably Hubert of Saint-Clair; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, iii. p. 50. The count's subtenant Hubert in Somerset is identified as Hubert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de sancto claro}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  in the Exon entry corresponding to SOM 19,10.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab `WINTERBORNE'.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  On the eastern River Winterborne, possibly in Combsditch Hundred; see 26,13 'Winterborne' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,34\tab IN '}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 WINTERBORNE'. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 IN }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is interlined with the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 I }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 e
xtended down to the line below, the normal method of indicating the position of an interlineation; in Farley only the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 N }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is interlined, in error.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab This 'Winterborne' lay on the eastern River Winterborne, possibly in Combsditch Hundred; see 26,13 'Winterborne' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,35\tab MELBURY. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Meleberie}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Melesberie}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
are later represented by Melbury Abbas in Sixpenny Handley Hundred (19,6 Melbury note) and by a separate group of three adjacent parishes: Melbury Osmond and Melbury Bubb in Yetminster Hundred 
and Melbury Sampford in Tollerford Hundred. It has not been possible to identify all four Domesday entires (26,35. 32,2. 47,2. 56,17) with these three adjacent modern villages. An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that all four Domesday holdings were Y
e
tminster Hundred in 1086, and if Melbury Sampford was among them it must later have been transferred to Tollerford Hundred. The holding at 47,2 can be confidently identified with Melbury Bubb and the Count of Mortain's land here with Melbury Osmond, given
 by his son William to Montacute Priory; see the Montacute Cartulary (Maxwell Lyte and others, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bruton and Montacute Cartularies}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ), }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 passim}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 185a; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 86 note 49; F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 226. Melbury Sampford is held in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 35, by }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Alda de Sanford }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Mellbyry Turberevyle }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from Hugh }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Despensar}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The latter is a Mohun tenant at Winterborne Houghton (36,3; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 27) and it is possible that Melbury Sampford was part of the Mohun holding of West Chelborough (36,8) and not separately accounted for in Domesday.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 2 \'bd HIDES. The Tax Return for Yetminster Hundred states that the king has not had tax from \'bd hide held by Dodman from the Count of Mortain 'this year'. See }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. pp
. 117-18, on the dating of the Tax Returns.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,36\tab `WINTERBORNE'.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  This 'Winterborne' can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Combsditch Hundred; see 26,13 'Winterborne' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,37\tab [LANGTON LONG] BLANDFORD. Domesday }{\i\insrsid9113064 Blaneford}{\insrsid9113064 . It was identified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 86 no 185, as Blandford St Mary, followed by }{
\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{\insrsid9113064 . }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 26,29 Blandford note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,38\tab MANNINGTON. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The place can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Canedone'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred. It was la
ter in Badbury Hundred with which 'Canedone' Hundred was merged.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,39\tab HUBERT. See 26,33 Hubert note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab HEMSWORTH. A Mortain fee in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 426; held from John }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Meriet }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 by John }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Cormayles }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Cranborne Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 27, 46.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,40\tab HUBERT. See 26,33 Hubert note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WITCHAMPTON. See 1,20 Witchampton note; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 29. An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in Badbury Hundred in 1086.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WOODLAND 1 FURLONG LONG AND 8 ACRES WIDE. Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 acras}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
accusative of extent, as on several occasions (for example, 5,1); however, the nominative appears in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 una quarentina }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and in numerous other instances. The number of different phrases used to describe the measure
\-ments of pasture, woodland etc. probably confused the scribe; for example, both the genitive }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 siluae }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and the nominative }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 silua }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 are used in the phrase 'woodland, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 y }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 furlongs in both length and width'. The accusative }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 acras }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 may, however, be the result of the main scribe of Great Domesday's copying of 
Exon: in a great many Exon entries all the details of population, livestock, pasture, woodland etc. are put in the accusative as the objects of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 habet }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (the subject being the holder of the manor).}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab ON WHICH HE HAS NEVER PAID TAX. On the 1 virgate and the third part of 1 virgate, rather than just on the one-third virgate (the singular }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de qua }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
is normally used after 1 virgate and one-third virgate; but see 26,19 ploughs note): the Tax Return for Badbury Hundred states that the king has never had tax from the th
ird part of 1 hide which Picot holds from the Count of Mortain (Picot apparently holding before Hubert or being a subtenant, or a scribal error).}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 26,41\tab LODERS. The first of these two holdings (26,41-42) can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Goderthorn' Hundred. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 11, 34, two parts of }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Lodres Luttone }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in 'Goderthorn' Hundred [now Matravers in Loders parish; see F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 258] are Mortain fees, another part being derived from the land of the wife of Hugh (55,24). See 1,13 Loders note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 26,42\tab LODERS. See 26,41 Loders note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ALFRED [* THE BUTLER *]. Prob}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ably Alfred the (count's) butler (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 pincerna}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
who is a subtenant of the Count of Mortain in Somerset (and perhaps Cornwall) and who in 15,1 holds part of Purse Caundle from Athelney Abbey, which the count had given that abbey in exchange for 'Bishopstone' (see SOM 19,86), where Alfred also held land.
 The Alfred in 26,62 is probably also Alfred the butler.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,43\tab ANSGER [* OF MONTACUTE *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab KNOWLTON. It probably included Woodlands which has the same later descent; see Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 151. Woodlands is now the parish name.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab IT PAID TAX. Or perhaps, in this case, 'he (Aelmer) paid tax [on the 2 hides]', as one would expect the plural }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 geldabant }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 referring to the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .ii. hid'}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 unless the scribe meant the singular }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 geldabat }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 to refer to the holding as a whole. See 1,14 paid note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,44\tab GUSSAGE [ALL SAINTS]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Three modern villages bear the name. Gussage St Michael was an outlying part of Badbury Hundred, held in 1086 by Earl Aubrey and wrongly entered in the Wiltshire folios; see \{
Introduction: Places Entered in the Wrong Domesday County\}. Gussage St Andrew was held by the Abbess of Shaftesbury (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. pp. 30, 39, 50) and was probably included by Domesday in the details of Handley (19,1), The present Mortain holding was Gussage All Saints, held as a Mortain fee in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 91 (see pp. 378, 752); see also the Montacute Cartulary (Maxwell Lyte and others, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bruton and Montacute Cartularies}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 8 p. 124); Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, iii. p. 489.}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 It can be located in Knowlton Hundred by an analysis of its Tax Return. Portions of this holding were at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Boressen }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
[Bowerswain farm in Gussage All Saints, SU0009; see F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 92; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 279] held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 42, in Knowlton Hundred by the prior of Montacute; also }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hunecroft }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Loverlay }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
['Hunecroft' surviving only as a field name (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 283) and Loverley, SU0008, both in this same parish of Gussage All Saints] confirmed on Montacute Priory by Henry I: }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ii. pp. 180-81 nos. 1367-68.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab EDMER [* ATOR *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,45\tab WILLIAM [* OF LESTRE *]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 William is probably William of Lestre (who as William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Estra }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
in the Tax Return for Whitchurch Hundred holds from the count land identifiable as Catherston Leweston; see 26,64 Catherston note).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab KNIGHTON. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dervinestone}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , that is Durweston, of which William's portion can be specifically identified as Knighton.}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 In 1212 (}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 87) 2 \'bd hides are held by Richard }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Estre }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Knicteton' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in 'Hundesburge'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }
{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred, and in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 92, by Richard }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Atrio }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [the Latin version of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Estre}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  or }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de l'Estre}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Durewneston'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Dorset Survey}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 131; F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 52; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 93.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 26,46\tab THIS ENTRY and those following (26,47-61) are written in a smaller script and paler ink than the preceding ones; see 12,13 entry note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab BRYANSTON.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\insrsid9113064 Domesday }{\i\insrsid9113064 Blaneford}{\insrsid9113064 . It was tentatively identified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 
, iii. p. 87 no. 194, as Blandford Forum and by }{\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{\insrsid9113064  as Bryanston;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
see 26,29 Blandford note. This land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Hundesburge'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred and is thus distinct from Blandford St Mary and Langton Long Blandford; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 90; F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 51.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab EDMER [* ATOR *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 26,47\tab BROCKINGTON. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Brochem'tune}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 In Gussage All Saints parish; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 280. The holding can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Alvredesberge' Hundred and is thus unlikely to be Brockhampton Green in Buckland Newton, as proposed by }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. }{\insrsid9113064 p. 87 no 195. The identification with Brockington is due to }{\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{\insrsid9113064 .}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,48\tab `WINTERBORNE'. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 On the eastern River Winterborne, possibly in Bere Hundred; see 26,13 'Winterborne' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 26,49\tab BESTWALL. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Beastewelle }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 meaning '[place] to the east of the [town] wall' (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, i. p. 158), the town being Wareham. The holding can be located in Bere Hundred by an analysis of its Tax Return, though it was later in Winfrith Hundred; see 49,14 Hethfelton note. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 42, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Byestewall }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is held by William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Estok }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Barrow Hundred. The same man holds [East] Stoke (26,52).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab EDMER [* ATOR *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 26,50\tab LULWORTH. An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in Winfrith Hundred. This land is included among fees of Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Bello Campo }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 751, and contained }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Gatemerston }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ['Gatemerston',}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 SY8481, in East Lulworth parish; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}
{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 124] held from John }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Bello Campo }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 29; also }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Sanctum Andream }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }
{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Behylde Hywysche }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Saint Andrew's farm in West Lulworth, SY8380, and Belhuish also in West Lulworth, SY8282] held by Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 filius Pagani }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (Fitzpaine) in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 29. In these last two the subtenant is William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Stok }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
who holds Bestwall and East Stoke (see 26,49 Bestwall note and 26,52 Stoke note); see also Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 377. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Gatemershton }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
appears as a Mortain fee in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. (Edward I) no. 609, and viii. (Edward III) no. 470; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Stokes St Andrew }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bustewall }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 appear in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. (Edward I) nos. 142-43 concerning William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Stokes}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{
\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ALSI. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Alsi }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 represents Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 \'c6lfsige }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 \'c6thelsige}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see von Feilitzen, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 151-52. As with }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Aluuardus }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
(3,1 Alward note) safety indicates keeping to the base form.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 4 SMALLHOLDERS [***]. The gap of about 11 letters' width left after this in the manuscript was presumably for their ploughs. See 1,26 villagers note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 26,51\tab LULWORTH. See 26,50 Lulworth note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab TRASWIN. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Trauuin'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , which}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 occurs only here in Domesday, is either Old German }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Traswin }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 with Anglo-Norman loss of -}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 s-}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 or a scribal error for }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Frauuin'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  ('Frawin'); von Feilitzen, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 388, 252. A 'Frawin' occurs four times as a }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 T.R.E.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  holder in Domesday Devon.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 26,52\tab [EAST] STOKE. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Stoches}{\insrsid9113064 . }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 In the order of the text, this place falls in a group of holdings in Winfrith Hundred a
nd Hasler Hundred and is identified with East Stoke (in Winfrith Hundred) by Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 410, Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dorset Survey}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 142, and }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 . }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. pp. 87, 142, identifies Stock Gaylard in Lydlinch, but an entry in S
herborne Hundred would not be expected at this point in the schedule. The location of West Stoke is uncertain; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 145. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 9, East Stoke in Winfrith Hundred is held by Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 filius Pagani }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Fitzpaine] who holds Wootton (26,63) from Mortain. The subtenant in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Stok}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 also holds Mortain land; see 26,49 Bestwall note and 26,50 Lulworth note; Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 410.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab EDMER [* ATOR *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 26,53\tab STOBOROUGH. An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in Hasler Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,54\tab BRETEL. See 26,12 Bretel note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab CREECH. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Now represented by the parish of East Creech and by Creech Grange and West Creech in Steeple parish. The form }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Erlescrich }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (1301), cited in F\'e4gersten, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 133, and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 90, may refer to the Count of Mortain. Although Robert of Mortain was never an earl, the Latin }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 comes}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  can be translated as both 'earl' and 'count'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab This holding falls in a group of places in Winfrith Hundred and Hasler Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab SHEERWOLD <OF GOTHERS>. See 26,14 Sheerwold note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,55\tab BRETEL. See 26,12 Bretel note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 26,56\tab MORETON. In Winfrith Hundred. A Mortain fee, held with Hemsworth (26,39) and 'Winterborne' in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 426; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. pp. 10, 30, 49.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 6 VILLAGERS. In the manuscript the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 punctus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  after the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 vi }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is written higher than usual, level with the 
top (rather than with the bottom) of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 i}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; it is not an attempted correction to }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 vii}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,58\tab LODERS. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 This holding can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Eggardon Hundred; see 26,41 Loders note and 1,13 Loders note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,59\tab WILLIAM [* OF LESTRE *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab HOOKE. In Eggardon Hundred; it is a Mortain fee in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 424, and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 2, 33, 53. The holder in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , is William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Lestre}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 suggesting that the 1086 holder is the same
 William of Lestre who probably holds Knighton (26,45) and Catherston Leweston (26,64).}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,60\tab BRETEL. See 26,12 Bretel note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab WOOL. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Welle}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 which can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Winfrith Hundred.}{
\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 26,61\tab STUDLAND. In Ailwood (later Rowbarrow) Hundred. It is a Mortain fee in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 752; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 101; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 44.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 5 VILLAGERS AND 13 SMALLHOLDERS. The main scribe of Great Domesday may have failed to record any ploughs they had, when he began a new folio for the rest of the entry; compare 11,5 [wide] note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab SALT-HOUSES. See 26,15 salt-houses note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,62\tab ALFRED [* THE BUTLER *].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  See 26,42 Alfred note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab `STANTON [ST GABRIEL]'. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The name survives only as a parish and in St Gabriel's House near the remains of the church.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,63\tab BRETEL. See 26,12 Bretel note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WOOTTON [FITZPAINE]. A Mortain fee held by Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 filius Pagani }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Whitchurch Hundred: }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 38; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 45. It is possible that one of the two Mortain holdings at Wootton (26,63;69) was at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Merscwode }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Marshwood, SY3899] held by John }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Maundevile }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 38. Marshwood was }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 caput }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
of a barony (descent, like that of the honour of Bampton, from Walter of Douai, later held by a branch of the Mandevilles); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Devon}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. pp. 563-65 and Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}
{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii p. 260. The same John holds Buckhorn Weston (26,1) from Mortain in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 32. Marshwood may equally have been an outlier of Chideock (1,2), with which it is associated in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. (Edward I) no. 154.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab EDMER [* ATOR *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,64\tab WILLIAM [* OF LESTRE *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab CATHERSTON [LEWESTON]. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cerneli}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The name 'Cerne' applies to the modern rivers Cerne and Char; see \{
Introduction: Places Named from Rivers\}. The Tax Return for Whitchurch Hundred records that the king has never had tax 'from 1 hide which William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de estra }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [of Lestre, d\'e9
partement of Manche, France: Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 94-95], holds from the Count of Mortain; half this hide is [par
t of] the king's revenue'; this last sentence is interlined by the Exon scribe of the entry. This clearly refers to this entry and locates it on the River Char. It is identified by Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dorset Survey}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 pp. 141-42, with Catherston Leweston, an identification not mentioned by F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 284. Cerne Abbey holds it in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 38, and it must be the same as 'Cerne' held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 92, by Richard }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Altrio}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 a descendant of William of Lestre; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 60. The same man holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Durewneston' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
[Knighton, 26,45] also held by William in 1086. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 45, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cardeston Leuston }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is held by John}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  de Pavely}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , who is a Mortain tenant at Hooke (26,59) in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 2; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 426. Hooke wa
s also held by William [of Lestre] in 1086.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab WAS [}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 PART] OF THE LORDSHIP REVENUE OF 'CERNE'. In the Tax Return for Whitchurch Hundred this \'bd hide is stated to be }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de firma regis}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 In Domesday, however, the king holds no manor of 'Cerne' and if the Tax Ret
urn is correct, the king may have been holding land belonging to Cerne Abbey, temporarily alienated, as was some of the land of Glastonbury Abbey (see 8,1 hides note). This may explain why Cerne Abbey holds the land in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}
{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 38, it having been restored; see 26,64 Catherston note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,65\tab WILLIAM [* OF LESTRE *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,66\tab DROGO [* OF MONTACUTE *]. Pr}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 obably Drogo of Montacute; see 26,2 Drogo note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab TOLLER [WHELME].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  The holding can be identified from an analysis 
of the Tax Return for Beaminster Hundred and thus represents Toller Whelme, up river and in a different hundred from Toller Fratrum and Toller Porcorum (40,9 Toller note). The name is that of the river, Whelme being Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
aewielm }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('river-spring'). In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 426, William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Monte Acuto }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 renders for 1 fee in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Tore }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Luveford}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 that is, Toller and 'Lovard'; see 26,21 'Piddle' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 26,67\tab CHARMOUTH. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cernemude }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('mouth of the [River] Cerne'), now the River Char; see 26,64 Catherston note and \{Introduction: Places Named from Rivers\}
. The land lay in Whitchurch Hundred and was held from Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Bello Campo }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 751; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 94, 1468.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 26,68\tab SHILVINGHAMPTON. A Mortain fee in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 426; it can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Uggescombe' Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,69\tab BRETEL. See 26,12 Bretel note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab WOOTTON [}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 FITZPAINE]. See 26,63 Wootton note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 26,70\tab [STOURTON] CAUNDLE.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  There are now four parishes representing Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Candel}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 :}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Stourton Caundle (earlier Caundle Haddon) in Brunsell Hundred, and Purse Caundle, Caundle Marsh and Bishops Caundle all in Sherborne Hundred. The exact relation of these parishes to the nine Domesday entries is not entirely clear. Bishops Caundle a
nd Caundle Marsh were probably accounted for in the 43 hides of Sherborne (2,6), since the Bishop of Salisbury holds them in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 4. Purse Caundle is the land held by Athelney Abbey (15,1) and probably also the 2 \'bd virgates of 56,55 which we
re in Sherborne Hundred in 1086, although some of Purse Caundle may have been in Brunsell Hundred according to an analysis of the Tax Returns. The remaining places called }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Candel}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 have been provisionally assigned to Stourton Caundle, of which Caundle Wake was a hamlet (Caundle }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bevin }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 40; see}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 211-12) before being absorbed by Bishops Caundle. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 40, Caundle Haddon (the
 later Stourton Caundle) is divided between five holders and thus in 1316 still seemed to preserve the mixed ownership of Domesday. Of these Caundle holdings those of 26,70. 38,2. 54,2 and 56,54 can be identified as lying in Brunsell Hundred from an analy
sis of its Tax Return.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ALSTAN [* OF BOSCOMBE *]. Predecessor of William of Eu who acquired almost all of Alstan's holdings as well as those of his men; see Clarke, }{\i\insrsid9113064 English Nobility}{\insrsid9113064 
, pp. 229-31, to which should be added "Slacham" (HAM 1,32), Boxbury (HRT 2
8,3), Eckweek (SOM 19,61), and possibly the present holding and Barton (SOM 21,92). Boxbury was evidently omitted by accident; but the Alstan of "Slacham" is identified by the intermediate ownership of Ralph of Lim\'e9
sy, while he of Eckweek is named in Exon.
 Eckweek devolved upon the Count of Mortain so it is possible that the two other holdings he acquired from an Alstan in Dorset and Somerset, both of which lay in the same general area as the remainder of Alstan of Boscombe's in those counties, came from t
he same man (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 26,71\tab AELFEVA. Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Aelfgifu}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 feminine.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 27\tab EARL HUGH. Hugh of Avranches (d\'e9partement of Manche, France), nephew of King}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 William; Earl of Chester 
1071/1077 to 1101. His daughter Matilda married Count Robert of Mortain and his sister Count William of Eu. His lands later formed the honour of Chester, on which see Farrer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Honours and Knights' Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ii. pp. 284-87.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this chapter.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 27,1\tab FIFEHEAD [MAGDALEN].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Granted to the canons of St Augustine's, Bristol, by Robert fitz Harding, probably grandson of Ednoth the staller, a gift confirmed by Earl Ranulf of Chester: }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , vi. p. 366; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 22, 40. There is a confirmation by John (then Count of Mortain, later King); see Patterson }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Earldom of Gloucester Charters}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 p. 49 no. 31.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab GILBERT [* THE HUNTER *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab ALNOTH}{\insrsid9113064  [* EDNOTH THE CONSTABLE *]}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 . Alnoth here 
and in 27,1;8-11 and Ednoth in 27,3-4;6 are probably one man, that is, Alnoth (or Ednoth) the constable who was Earl Hugh's predecessor in other counties as well. He was killed in battle against Earl Harold's sons in 1067. See SOM 18,1 Ednoth note and SOM
 39,1 Alnoth note.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab }{\insrsid9113064 Ednoth, named Ednoth the constable (}{\i\insrsid9113064 Ednod}{\insrsid9113064  }{\i\insrsid9113064 Stalre}{\insrsid9113064 ) in BRK 7,7 and Ednoth the steward (}{\i\insrsid9113064 Ednod dapifer}{
\insrsid9113064 ) in WIL 22,5, was one of the predecessors of Earl Hugh of Chester, a fact which permits the identification of many of those holdings wher
e he is named simply Ednoth. He has also been plausibly identified as the Ednoth of Ugford in Wiltshire and of Whitchurch in Hampshire. In many instances, however, Earl Hugh's predecessor is called Alnoth}{\i\insrsid9113064  (Alnod, Elnod}{
\insrsid9113064 ), and scholarly opinion is divided as to whether this is the same individual as Ednoth. Since Ednoth the constable had a son Harding (William of Malmesbury, }{\i\insrsid9113064 Gesta Regum}{\insrsid9113064 
, p. 471), and Harding son of Alnoth (}{\i\insrsid9113064 Harding filius Alnod}{\insrsid9113064 ) held land in Wiltshire in 1086 (SOM 47,3-8), the identity of Edno
th and Alnoth seems probable, further strengthened by the appearance of a Ceolred - a rare name - among the dependents of both Harding son of Alnoth and Harding son of Ednoth: Lewis, }{\cf17\insrsid9113064 'Formation of the Honour of Chester',}{
\insrsid9113064  pp. 67-68; Williams, }{\i\insrsid9113064 The English and the Norman Conquest}{\insrsid9113064 
, pp. 119-22. As Dr Williams has pointed out, a similar scribal confusion between Alnoth and Ednoth can be detected in Cornwall and Lincolnshire (}{\i\insrsid9113064 ibid}{\insrsid9113064 
em, p. 121 note 127). A like confusion may account for the omission of Ednoth's lands in Devon and Dorset from Peter Clarke's lists, along with Knowle, Ugford and Whitchurch: Clarke, }{\i\insrsid9113064 English Nobility}{\insrsid9113064 , pp. 281-82 (JP).
}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 27,2\tab WILLIAM [* MALBANK *].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 Here and elsewhere in this chapter William is probably William Malbank, a subtenant of Earl Hugh in other counties. Clifton Maybank (27,6) is named after him. See also 27,10 virgate note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ALNOTH ... HELD}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ... THROUGH EARL HAROLD. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Elnod tenuit}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ... }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 p}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 er}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  H}{\i\f827\cf1\insrsid9113064 erald\'fb comit}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 em}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]; the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 per }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
implies that this was not a normal subtenancy: it would appear that Earl Harold obtained the manor illegally and gave it to Alnoth. On Alnoth, see 27,1 Alnoth note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab LAND FOR 1 \'bd PLOUGHS, WHICH ARE THERE. Latin ...}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 q}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 uae}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  ibi e}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 st
}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ],}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 singular; see 26,19 ploughs note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 27,3\tab WILLIAM [* MALBANK *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab EDNOTH [* THE CONSTABLE *]. See 27,1 Alnoth note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 27,4\tab WILLIAM [* MALBANK *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab MAYNE.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  There were two
 estates at Mayne in 1086 (27,4-5) and there are now three places, Broadmayne (SY7286), Fryer Mayne (SY7386) and Little Mayne (SY7287), the first a detached parish of St George (formerly Dorcherster) Hundred within Cullifordtree Hundred, the last two a pa
r
t of West Knighton parish, Cullifordtree Hundred. The exact relation of the two Domesday holdings to these is unclear, though an analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that in 1086 some of the land lay in Chilbury Hundred (part of the later Winfrith Hundred
). One of the Domesday lands was undoubtedly Little Mayne, earlier Mayne }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Syrard }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 named from Sirard to whom it descended from the Earls of Chester and who gave it to St Werburgh's Abbey, Chester; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 19-20; Farrer }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Honours and Knights' Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ii. pp. 284-87; F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 154-155; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 208. The other may well have been Fryer Mayne, earlier }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Mayne Ospitalis }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 18, 20), held by the Knights Hospitalers. This seems to have had dependencies at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Stafford Ospitalis }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
['East Stafford' in West Knighton parish coupled with Mayne in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Lay Subsidy Roll (1334)}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 73; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, i. p. 209; and 26,7 Stafford note] and at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Waye }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Westebroke Ospitalis }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Westbrook in Upwey, earlier }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Weywestbrok}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 SY6684; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 248; and 26,14 'Wey' note]; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. pp. 90-91. Broadmayne is held as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Mayne Martel }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in St George Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 31, 51, by Peter son of Reginald and Reginald son of Peter from J
ohn son of Peter or John }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Vyvonia}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Both the names of the holders and the fact that Broadmayne was a detachment of St George Hundred suggest a different origin for this holding, which may have been part of the royal manor of Dorchester (1,4) in 1086; in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 C
alendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , vi. (Edward II) no. 724, it is associated with }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hyneton }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (1,31), }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Mapoudre }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (1,8), }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Mapelerton }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (Mapperton) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wolverton }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (1,4 Dorchester note).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab EDNOTH [* THE CONSTABLE *]. See 27,1 Alnoth note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 27,5\tab WILLIAM [* MALBANK *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab MAYNE. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 27,4 Mayne note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 27,6\tab WILLIAM [* MALBANK *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab CLIFTON [MAYBANK].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  In Yetminster Hundred; see 27,2 William note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab EDNOTH [* THE CONSTABLE *]. See 27,1 Alnoth note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab TRILL. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Lying to the east of the River Wriggle, a tributary of the River Yeo which divided Sherborne Hundred from Yetminster Hundred. It had belonged to Sherborne Abbey (Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iv. p. 431) and clearly had been unlawfully joined to Clifton. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Clifton }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Tryll }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 are held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 41, in Yetminster Hundred by Philip }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Maubank}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab JOINTLY. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 in par'ag' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
written into the right margin in darker ink, perhaps later, the first abbreviation sign being faint and perhaps intended to be erased, as it is superfluous. Farley printed }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 in parag' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
in correction (see 1,5 manor note).}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 27,7\tab WILLIAM [* MALBANK *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab HELD. An ink blot in the manuscript covers the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 u }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and part of the second }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 e }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 tenuer'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see 26,23 holds note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 27,8\tab WILLIAM [* MALBANK *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ALNOTH [* EDNOTH THE CONSTABLE *]. See 27,1 Alnoth note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 27,9\tab WILLIAM [* MALBANK *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab [SOUTH] PERROTT. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 North Perrott is in Somerset, held in 1086 by the Count of Mortain (SOM 19,45).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ALNOTH [* EDNOTH THE CONSTABLE *] B}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 OUGHT THIS MANOR FOR HIS LIFETIME ONLY. In other words he}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
purchased the lease of South Perrott for his own life only. Also in 27,10. On Alnoth/Ednoth, see 27,1 Alnoth note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab BISHOP ALWOLD. Of Sherborne; see 2,6 Sherborne note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab RESTORED TO THE CHURCH. Neither this manor nor Catsley (27,10) appears to have}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 been restored to Sherborne.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 27,10\tab WILLIAM [* MALBANK *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ALNOTH [* EDNOTH THE CONSTABLE *]. See 27,1 Alnoth note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 1 VIRGATE ... AFTER 1066. Entered in the right marg
in with no transposition signs to indicate its correct position in the text. The Tax Return for Beaminster Hundred states that the king has never had tax from 1 virgate which William Malbank (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Malbeenc}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 holds from Earl Hugh. Compare the additional information from Exon in 55,16 (55,16 'Puddle' note) and also DEV 19,6 where \'bd
 virgate has been concealed with the result that the king has no tax from it; see DEV 19,6 virgate note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 27,11\tab WILLIAM [* MALBANK *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ALNOTH [* EDNOTH THE CONSTABLE *]. See 27,1 Alnoth note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 28\tab ROGER OF BEAUMONT. Roger, who also held land in Gloucestershire (GLS 40), appears to have been an old man by the time of Domesday Book. About 1094-1095 he entered the monastery of St Pierre at Pr\'e9aux, which his 
father Humphrey of Vieilles had founded }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 c}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 . 1034. He died some years later; see Orderic Vitalis, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Ecclesiastical History}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, (Chibnall, ii. pp. 12-13, iv. pp. 302-305) Roger's son Robert inherited the title of the Count of Meulan through his mother Adeline and 
was a tenant-in-chief in Northamptonshire, Warwickshire and Leicestershire. Another son, Henry, became Earl of Warwick }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 c}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
. 1089. Roger of Beaumont's lands passed to his son Count Robert of Meulan, then to Waleran (also Count of Meulan), and thence to his grand-daughter Mabel, wife of William of Redvers, Earl of Devon. Beaumont is most probably Beaumont-le-Roger in the d\'e9
partement of Eure, France; see Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 71.
\par \tab \tab No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this chapter.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 28,1\tab STOUR.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Stur}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The land was at Stour Provost in Gillingham Hundred, a corruption of Stour }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pratellorum }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pr\'e9aux }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from the Abbey of Saint-L\'e9ger of Pr\'e9
aux in Normandy (founded, like its twin monastery of Saint-Pierre, by Roger's father; see DOR 28 Roger note). Although there is no mention of the grant in Domesday, the Tax Return for Gillingham Hundred records 3 \'bd
 hides of lordship land for the Abbess of Pr\'e9aux and a further 3 \'bd hides on which no tax has been paid, thus accounting for the 7 hides of the Domesday holding. See }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. pp. 37, 141; F\'e4
gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 17. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 22, the Abbess of Pr\'e9aux holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Sture Pratell}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 is}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from the Earl of Leicester; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 177a.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 28,2\tab STURMINSTER [MARSHALL].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Held by the Earl Marshall from the Count of Meulan in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 90; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, iii. p. 55. The tithes were given in a charter of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 c}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 . 1080 to the Abbey of Pr\'e9aux by Robert, Count of Meulan, and Henry, Earl of Warwick, the sons of Roger of Beaumont; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 i. no. 130 p. 34; Round, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Documents}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  France}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 85 nos. 251-52. The manor can be indentified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Cogdean Hundred; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 60-61; and 1,5 Charlton note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ARCHBISHOP STIGAND. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Stigand was Bishop of Elmham (East Anglia) in 1043, then 1044-47, before becoming Bishop of Winchester in 1047, which see he held with the Archbishopric of Canterbury from 1052 until he was deposed in 1070. He died in 1072. Se
e Darlington, 'Ecclesiastical Reform', p. 420, on Stigand's status as Archbishop of Canterbury.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WHEN HE ACQUIRED IT. Exon regularly gives the former value of a manor as 'when acquired' by the 1086 holder, but this was usually changed to 'Value was'
 or 'Formerly' in Domesday. Here and in 31,2 and 47,7 the main scribe of Great Domesday may have copied Exon too closely; however, this was also the case in a number of entries in Domesday Somerset and Devon. See 47,7 acquired note.}{\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 28,3\tab CREECH. This place, like Steeple and [Church] Knowle (28,4-5) can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Hasler Hundred. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 89, Geoffrey }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Nevile }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Knolle}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Stupel }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Crihz }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
in Hasler Hundred as Gloucester fees, formerly held by Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Tebovill'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Cnolle }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Stypele }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
are also held of the Earl of Gloucester in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 23; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. (Henry III) no. 530; Hutchins, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 597.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab KOLBRAND <OF CREECH>. The name Kolbrand occurs six times in Domesday Book, on modest holdings scattered between Devon and Yorkshire. There are no apparent connections between the other holdings and that in Dorset (JP).}{
\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 28,4\tab STEEPLE. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 28,3 Creech note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 28,5\tab [CHURCH] KNOWLE. Domesday }{\i\insrsid9113064 Glole}{\insrsid9113064 . It was identified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 89 no. 235, as Church Knowle and by }{\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{
\insrsid9113064  as Lutton Gwyle}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; but see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 87. See also 28,3 Creech note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 28,6\tab AFFLINGTON.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  The place was later fully in Rowbarrow Hundred. In 1086 it was divided between}{\insrsid9113064  Ailwood Hundred, }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Rowbarrow Hundred's predecessor, (the holdings at 28,6-7) and Hasler Hundred (41,1 and 57,20), according to an analysis of the Tax Returns for the two hundreds
. The entry at 37,7 cannot be identified in a Tax Return, but is sandwiched between two places in Hasler Hundred. Afflington is named after Aelfrun, the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 T.R.E.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  holder of the present entry; see F\'e4gersten, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 117; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 7.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 2 VILLAGERS AND 2 SMALLHOLDERS. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .ii. uill'is 7 ii. bord'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Farley omitted the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 7}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064  in error.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 28,7\tab AFFLINGTON. See 28,6 Afflington note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab LEODMER <OF AFFLINGTON>. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 29\tab ROGER OF COURSEULLES.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Also known as Roger Whiting; see Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 11. He is named from Courseulles-sur-Mer which is in the d\'e9
partement of Calvados, France.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this chapter.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 29,1\tab CORTON. In 'Uggescombe' Hundred; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 6, 34, 53.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 30\tab ROBERT SON OF GERALD. For the descent of his lands, see Cazel, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Norman and Wessex Charters of the Roumare Family}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 77-88.
\par \tab \tab No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this ch
apter. Summaries of the total holding of Robert son of Gerald in Dorset, Somerset and Wiltshire are given in Exon 530b3-5, but the figures and values given do not relate very closely to his lands in these counties.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 30,1\tab CORFE [MULLEN]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 It can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Cogdean Hundred. The affixed name is from Old French }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 molin}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  
}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 molendinum }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (Modern French }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 moulin}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
'mill', and perhaps refers to the valuable mill here in 1086; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 15. Later there were two manors here, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Corf Molyn }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Corf Huberd}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 held respectively by Henry }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Herdynton }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and Hubert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 La Veylle }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 as small Mortain fees in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 28; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 90.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab WADA [* SON OF AETHELGYTH *].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Perhaps Wada son of Aethelgyth (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wada \'e6gelgethe sunu}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ); see}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 von Feilitzen, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 407 note 2.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par \tab \tab The name Wada occurs on six holdings in Domesday Book and may represent four, five or six individuals. The two Dorset holdings [see also 55a,1] are the only on
es in southern England and are only a few miles apart; it is likely they were held by the same individual (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 30,2\tab LEIGH. In Colehill parish. The identification is not secure, although the order of Domesday makes it not improbable; see F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 79; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 137.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 3 VILLAGERS HAVE IT THERE. The plough, see 3,14 woman note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 5 'RODS'. See 11,6 rods note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 30,3\tab IN THE CENTRAL MARGIN beside this entry is written a large backward sloping }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 f}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , not printed by Farley. It is similar to the letters }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 f}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 n}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  and other marginal figures found in Domesday Gloucestershire and which are discussed in GLS \{Introduction: The Manuscript\}, and resembles the letter }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 f}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 that appears in the margins of Domesday Nor
folk, also not printed by Farley. This is the only occurrence of such a marginal figure in Dorset and, unlike the Gloucestershire ones, it is not written next to the first entry of the chapter. See Thorn, 'Marginal Notes and Signs', pp. 129-31 }{
\insrsid9113064 (= Erskine and Williams, }{\i\insrsid9113064 The Story of Domesday Book}{\insrsid9113064 , pp. 195-97).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab RANSTON. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Iwerne}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Iwerne is a river name, applied in Domesday to five settlements on its banks. Of these, Iwerne Minster (}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Euneminstre}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 19,7) in Handley Hundred is separately identified by Do
mesday and the identifications of Iwerne Courtney (42,1) in Gillingham Hundred and Iwerne Stepleton (36,9) in Pimperne Hundred rest on firm evidence. Of the remaining places called 'Iwerne', the land at 56,32 is identifiable from an analysis of the Tax Re
t
urn for Pimperne Hundred and it is probable that the present holding was there as well since it is entered at the wrong point in the chapter for a place in Gillingham Hundred or Handley Hundred. The lands of 30,3 and 56,32 are represented by Ranston and L
azerton; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 117; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dorset Survey}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 pp. 63, 137-38; F\'e4gersten, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 11, 59. Ranston was later in Iwerne Courtney (and so, notionally, in Gillingham and Redlane Hundred) and Lazerton in Stourpaine, alth
ough they were both formerly in Pimperne Hundred. Ranston is possibly derived from Ranulf }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 le Meschin }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 who may have inherited Robert son of Gerald's estate; see F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 12. It is held as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Randolfeston }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Pimperne Hundred from the honour of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cammel }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
[Queen Camel in Somerset] to which Robert's estates descended; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 1, 43, 46; Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, iii. p. 95. Iwerne Stepleton or Stepleton Iwerne survives as a parish name; the name is also represented by Stepleton House (ST8611).}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 30,4\tab POVINGTON. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 This estate can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Hasler Hundred. It was granted by Robert son of Gerald to the Abbot of Bec-Hellouin in Normandy; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 89; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 24; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 118 note 91; Morgan, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
English Lands of the Abbey of Bec}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 141.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab IN WAREHAM A BURGESS ... 2s. This was written by the main scribe of Great Domesday in the left margin of the manuscript and probably at an early stage because the two 
vertical ink lines surrounding it have been rubricated. No transposition signs indicate its correct position in the entry.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab MILL ... FOR THE KING'S USE. The revenue from the mill went to the king. It is possible that the king was claiming the mill as part of the adjacent land at Lulworth (1,6). On }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 opus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see B1 use note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 31\tab EDWARD OF SALISBURY.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Sheriff of Wiltshire in 1086. No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this chapter.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 31,1\tab CANFORD [MAGNA]. The 25 hides probably included the modern parishes of Hamworthy, Parkstone, Longfleet and Poole. Little Canford is in Hampreston: }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 2. Canford Magna is identifiable from an analysis of the Tax Return for Cogdean Hundred. The Earl of Salisbury (a descendant of Edward) holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Caneford }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 90, and the Earl of Lincoln holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Caneford }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Kynstenston }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Kinson, 31,2] in Cogdean Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 28, 47.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab WULFWYNN [* OF CRESLOW *]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 She was one of Edward of Salisbury's predecessors in Wiltshire and Somerset.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WATER-MEADOW. }{\i\f820\cf1\insrsid9113064 Broc\'ea}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 genitive singular, a first declension Latinization of Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 broc}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See Domesday HEF 24,2 water-meadow note for other forms. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Broc }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
came to mean 'a brook', but originally the word (like its cognates Middle Dutch and Dutch }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 brock}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Low German }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 brok}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Old High German and Modern German }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 bruch}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 meant 'marsh', 'bog' etc., a sense retained by }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 brook 
}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('water-meadow') in the Modern English dialects of Kent, Sussex and Surrey and in medieval field names in Cambridgeshire and Essex and in some place-names; see }{\insrsid9113064 Ekwall, }{\i\insrsid9113064 
Dictionary of English Place-Names}{\insrsid9113064 ,}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  under }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 broc}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Canford Magna lies on the River Stour at a point where it winds slowly through a flat and formerly marshy valley. See 34,5 water-meadow note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 31,2\tab KINSON. An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in Cogdean Hundred. It was transferred to Hampshire in 1930; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 22; and 31,1 Canford note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab WULFWYNN [* OF CRESLOW *]. S}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ee 31,1 Wulfwynn nore.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WHEN HE ACQUIRED THEM. See 28,2 value note and 47,7 acquired note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 32\tab ARNULF OF HESDIN. A large landholder in Wiltshire. Hesdin is in the d\'e9partement of Pas-de-Calais, France.
\par \tab \tab No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this chapter.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 32,1\tab KINGTON. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 It can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Gillingham 
Hundred. The name is now represented by the parish of Kington Magna and by Little Kington farm in West Stour parish (see 40,2 Kington note and 56,2 Kington note). Arnulf's holding was Kington Magna, which passed to the Earls of Salisbury and Lincoln, unli
ke the rest of his fief (see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 58). }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Magna Kington' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is a fee of the Earl of Salisbury in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 753; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 22, 33.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab EDRIC <OF OLDBURY>. Edric was the predecessor of Arnulf of Hesdin in five counties, survived b
y his wife who was allowed to retain two holdings in Wiltshire as a tenant of Arnulf, with a house in Malmesbury. Edric had also held Linkenholt (HAM 7,1), adjacent to his manor at Combe, which Arnulf had granted to St Peter's of Gloucester. The name Edri
c is so common that it is probable that he had held other manors in those counties and possibly elsewhere. See also Clarke, }{\i\insrsid9113064 English Nobility}{\insrsid9113064 , p. 305 (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab AND 1 VIRGATE OF LAND. It was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday in the left margin with transposition signs to show its correct position in the text. It is poorly written in a cursive script.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\insrsid9113064 32,2\tab MELBURY.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  It can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Yetminster Hundred; see 26,35 Melbury note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 4 \'bd HIDES. The Tax Return for Yetminster Hundred states that the king has never had tax from \'bd hide which Urso holds from Arnulf of Hesdin.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 32,3\tab KINGCOMBE.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Possibly Higher Kingcombe, now in Toller Porcorum parish, Tollerford Hundred. It could well have lain in Eggardon Hundred in 1086; see 47,7 Wraxall note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 32,4\tab THIS ENTRY was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday below the last ruling on folio 80c, extending some four letters into the left margin, with a gap of a line (not shown by Farley) between it and 33,4.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab POORTON. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 13,7 Poorton note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE 12s 6d. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 xii. sol' 7}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 vi. den'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Farley misprinted }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 xx sol' 7.vi den'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 32,5\tab MAPPERTON. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The position in the schedule suggests the Mapperton near Beaminster, probably North Mapperton; see Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 158; and 36,11 Mapperton note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 33\tab "TURSTIN" SON OF ROLF}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 . Perhaps the standard bearer at Hastings (see Ellis, 'Landholders of Gloucestershire', pp. 186-87) who was rewarded with land in Gloucestershire, Somerset, Herefordshire, D
orset, Devon etc. His lands in Dorset passed to Wynebald de Ballon; his grandson was Henry }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Neufmarch\'e9 }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Novo Mercato}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ),}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 and the lands were later divided between Ralph }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Russel }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and Nicholas }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Moels}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
husbands of Henry's descendants.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this chapter.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 33,1\tab BERNARD [* PANCEVOLT *].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Probably Bernard Pancevolt ('Paunch-face': Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, pp. 324-25) who was a subtenant of "Turstin" son of Rolf in Somerset and probably in Gloucestershire too.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ALWOLD [* THE BALD *]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Aluuold }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 for Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 \'c6lfweald }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 \'c6thelweald}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see von Feilitzen, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 154-55. As with }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Aluuardus }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
(see 3,1 Alward note) safety indicates keeping to the base form.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }\pard\plain \s20\ql \fi-1080\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin1080\itap0\pararsid1786625 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab }{\insrsid9113064 
One of the predecessors of "Turstin" son of Rolf, named in Exon (SOM 36,7), an entry which indicates that Alwold was an officially designated antecessor, as also in SOM 36,2. His holding in Cheriton (SOM 36,14) makes it almost certain that he was the
 Alwold who leased land in the same vill from Cerne Abbey (SOM 28,2). See Clarke, }{\i\insrsid9113064 English Nobility}{\insrsid9113064 , pp 231-32 who, curiously, omits the entry in which he is named (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }\pard\plain \ql \fi-1080\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\faauto\rin0\lin1080\itap0\pararsid1786625 \fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 {\insrsid9113064 33,2\tab NYLAND.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 33, by Nicholas }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Mortesththorn }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Rossel de Horsington }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Gillingham Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 33,3\tab BERNARD [* PANCEVOLT *]. See}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  33,1 Bernard note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab IN THIS VILLAGE. That is, in Nyland; see 33,2 Nyland note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab DODA [* THE MONK *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 33,4\tab ALLINGTON.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Avicia }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Mortesthorne }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 holds in 'Goderthorn' Hundred from William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Russel }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 10; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 425.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab TRIBUTARIES. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Censores}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; see}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 16,1 tributaries note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 33,5\tab `STOKE [WALLIS]'. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Stoches}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 This land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for}{
\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Whitchurch Hundred, although all 7 virgates (1 hide in the present entry and 3 virgates in 33,6) pay tax in 'Goderthorn' Hundred. 'Stoke Wallis' is a lost site in Whitchurch Canonicorum parish (F\'e4gersten, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 297), recorded as Stoke on the first series one-inch Ordnance Survey map (no. 18 of 1811, reprint no. 84 of 1969). Thurstanshay, another lost name in the same parish, may preserve "Turstin"'s name. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , x. (Edward III) no. 312, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Stok Waleys Whitchurch }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is held from Eleanor }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Russel }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 by knight service.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 1 HIDE. The main scribe of Great Domesday originally wrote }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 car' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('plough') and then underlined it for deletion and interlined }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 hid' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
in correction, positioning it mostly over the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 car'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 rather than to the left as printed in Farley.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 33,6\tab `STOKE [WALLIS]'. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 33,5 Stoke note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 34\tab WILLIAM OF EU. William, Count of Eu (but see the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle (Whitelock }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 et alii}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 173 note 7) and Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dorset Survey}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 p. 120 note 7), the second son of Count Robert of Eu. More than half his fief lay in Wiltshire and Dorset. His second wife w
as the sister of Earl Hugh of Chester. He rebelled against William Rufus in 1088 and in 1094 and was charged with treason in 1096, was blinded and castrated and probably died soon after; see Orderic Vitalis, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Ecclesiastical History}
{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , (Chibnall, iv. pp. 284-85). He was executed in 1096 according to Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dorset Survey}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
p. 76. See GLS W16 William note. Some of his lands were later held by the Earls Marshall, Earls of Pembroke. Some of the earlier entries in the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  record these lands as held by Adam }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Port}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 On his exile, the fief was re-allotted. Eu is in the d\'e9partement of Seine-Maritime, France.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this chapter.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 34,1\tab WILLIAM. In the manuscript and Farley }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 WILLELM'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 the Ordnance Survey facsimile fails to
 reproduce most of the abbreviation sign, Compare 40,1 Waleran note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab THORNTON. This holding seems to be required to complete the analysis of the Tax Return for Gillingham Hundred Tax Return by making up the total. It was later in Marnhull in [Sturminster
] Newton Hundred, although a tithing of Redlane Hundred; see F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 44. Adam }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Port }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Thornton' }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Gillingham Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 91; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 22, 52.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab WILLIAM [* BELLETT *].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Probably William Bellett; see 34,2 Bradford note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ALSTAN [* OF BOSCOMBE *].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 Most probably the great Anglo-Saxon thane Alstan of Boscombe, both here and elsewhere in this chapter; his lands in some nine counties had apparently passed to William of Eu, though first to Ralph of Lim\'e9
sy (see GLS 31,4 and compare DOR 34,6 Ralph note). See also 26,70 Alstan note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 34,2\tab BRADFORD [PEVERELL].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  This }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bradeford }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
can be located by an analysis of the Tax Return for Dorchester Hundred, where the king has had no tax from 1 hide whichWilliam Bellett holds from William of Eu. Subsequently Bradford belonged to Adam }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Port }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (
}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 379) before being granted by King Richard to Robert Peverel; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 88, 260, 425; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 17. There is a separate place-name Peverell at SY6492.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab THOLF [* THE DANE *]. The Domesday forms of this name - }{\i\insrsid9113064 Tol}{\insrsid9113064 , }{\i\insrsid9113064 Toul}{\insrsid9113064 , }{\i\insrsid9113064 Tolf}{\insrsid9113064 , }{\i\insrsid9113064 Tou}{\insrsid9113064 , }{
\i\insrsid9113064 Toulf}{\insrsid9113064 , }{\i\insrsid9113064 Tulf}{\insrsid9113064 , }{\i\insrsid9113064 Tof}{\insrsid9113064 , }{\i\insrsid9113064 Thol}{\insrsid9113064  - represent Old Norse }{\i\insrsid9113064 Tholfr}{\insrsid9113064 , Old Danish }{
\i\insrsid9113064 Tholf}{\insrsid9113064  : von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid9113064 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\insrsid9113064 , pp. 389-90. Some of the peop
le named Tholf in the present edition appear as Tholfr, Tulf and Toli in some of the Phillimore printed translations; these have now been standardized as Tholf. The Alecto edition has Tholf. (This corrects the note in the Phillimore printed edition for Do
rset.)}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 34,3\tab WILLIAM [* BELLETT *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab "HIWES".}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Tentatively identified by Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dorset Survey}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 123-24, with Muckleford in Bradford Peverell par
ish. There is a Hewish in Portesham and in Milton Abbas, and a Huish in Sydling St Nicholas and in Winterborne Zelston.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 34,4\tab HUGH [* MALTRAVERS *]. See 34,5 Lytchett note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 34,5\tab HUGH [* MALTRAVERS *]. See 34,5 Lytchett note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab LYTCHETT [MATRAVERS]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Probably named from the family of William's tenant Hugh, who appears as Hugh }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Maltravers }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in SOM 26,5. He named the adjacent }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Morden Matravers }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [East Morden] which was probably part of this land in 1086; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , viii. (Edward III) no. 464; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 58; and 26,24 Morden note. John }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Mautravers }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 holds from the Earl of Gloucester in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 28, 47, in Cogdean Hundred. There is a Strigoil fee in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Litsed }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 426 (see 34,6 Ralph note) and a Marshall fee in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Lischet }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 753. The history of the other Lytchett (Lytchett Minster) which lies just to the south (SY9693) is unclear; it may have been a part of this land (see 34,5 water-meadow note) or of Sturminster Marshall (28,2; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 33), yet it appears to have connections with Canford [Magna] (31,1; see Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. pp. 289, 360).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab TOLI [* THOLF THE DANE *]. The Domesday form, }{\i\insrsid9113064 Tholi}{\insrsid9113064 , represents Old Danish/Old Norse }{\i\insrsid9113064 Toli}{\insrsid9113064 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid9113064 
Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\insrsid9113064 , p. 386. However, William of Eu's predecessor here, as in 34,2;6;8;12;14-15, is probably Tholf (see 34,2 Tholf note), called Tholf the Dane in HAM 32,1. William's predeces
sor in two estates in Wiltshire (WIL 32,16-17) and one in Devon (DEV 22,2), on the other hand, was }{\i\insrsid9113064 Toli}{\insrsid9113064 
, so he may have succeeded two different men with similar names or there may have been scribal confusion at some stage.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WATER-MEADOW[?]. }{\i\f820\cf1\insrsid9113064 Broc\'ea}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 genitiv
e singular; see 31,1 water-meadow note. However, Lytchett Matravers lies on rising ground, the only likely places for water-meadow being on the River Stour to the north, near Sturminster Marshall, if the holding stretched that far, or to the south of Lytc
hett Minster (if the latter was part of this holding in 1086; see 34,5 Lytchett note). So }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 broca }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 here might be a first declension Latin variant form of, or a simple error for, Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
brucus }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (whence hypothetical }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 brucaria}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  bruaria}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 French }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 bruy\'e8re }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 'brushwood', 'heathland'; see F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 112, and compare 10,2 heathland note). The reference would then be to Lytchett Heath (SY9695).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 34,6\tab WILLIAM [* OF AUDRIEU *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab BLANDFORD [ST MARY]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
The two places called Blandford are not easy to distinguish; see 26,29 Blandford note. In the present case, the Tax Return for Combsditch Hundred records that the king has never had tax from the 3 virgates which William of Moutiers (}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 demonasterio}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ) holds from William of Audrieu (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 dealdreio}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
). William of Audrieu was a tenant of William of Eu in other counties (for example, Wiltshire) and the 3 virgates may well represent the \'bd}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 hide in the present entry from which the king did not have tax.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab THOLF [* THE DANE *].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  See 34,2 Tholf note}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab HELD. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ten' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 was originally written and immediately corrected to }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 tenuit }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
(although there are numerous cases in Domesday of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ten' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 abbreviating the past tenses, especially when }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 T.R.E. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is in the sentence), without the ab
breviation sign being erased. Farley did not remove the sign;}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see 1,5 manor note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 3 SMALLHOLDERS. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 iii. bord' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is clearly written; in the Ordnance Survey facsimile the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 punctus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  after}{\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 iii }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is smudged upwards making the figure look like }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 iiii}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab RALPH OF LIMESY. William of Eu received many of his lands, as well as the Holding of}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Chepstow (see GLS W16 William note). See 34,1 Alstan note. Chepstow later became the}{\insrsid9113064  
}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 caput }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 of the honour of Strigoil from which some of this chapter's lands are held in the}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 feodaries. Lim\'e9sy is in the d\'e9partement of Seine-Maritime, France.}{
\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 34,7\tab WOOLCOMBE. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 In Melbury Bubb parish. John }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Mautravers }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wellecombe }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
in Yetminster Hundred from the Earl of Gloucester in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 41; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 36. It was sometimes called Woolcombe }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Mautravers}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; see F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 225.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 34,8\tab SWYRE. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Later in 'Uggescombe' Hundred, but an analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it probably lay in 'Goderthorn' Hundred in 1086, its nine hides being needed to make up the Tax Return total; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 131; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 88, 260; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 102; and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 6, 34, 54. Part of this land may have been at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Berewyk }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Berwick in Swyre, SY5289]; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 6; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. (Edward I) no. 2.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab THOLF [* THE DANE *]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 34,2 Tholf note}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab TO TOXUS [THE PRIEST?]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Toxo }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 with another letter (at least) interlined after it, extending down to }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Toxo. }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 The letter appears to be a}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  p }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 rather than a long }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 s}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
having a slight backwards hook at the top left-hand corner. Farley obviously took this letter as an }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 s}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 however (though he did not show that the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
s }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 was interlined), presumably intending }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Toxos }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 to be nominative (despite the nominative form }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Toxus }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
below) and the name of the king's reeve. (The translation would thus be 'Toxus, a king's reeve, had leased it, then returned it ...'.) There may be another letter after the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 p }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (if it is one), possibly an }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 r }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 pr' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is an abbreviation for }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 presbiter}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 'priest') or an}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  i}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , but it is impossible to be sure because the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 i }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 interlined over the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 q }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 q}{
\i\cf1\up6\insrsid9113064 i}{\i\f827\cf1\insrsid9113064 d\'e2 }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 gets in the way. Also, the interlined letter(s) and the -}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 xo }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Toxo are }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
written over erasures. See Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dorset Survey}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 p. 128 note 7. This is the only occurrence of the name-form }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Toxus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 in Domesday.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab BY KING EDWARD. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 p}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 er}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is interlined, the tail of the }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 p }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 extending down between }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 u}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 er}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 o }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\f827\cf1\insrsid9113064 reg\'e7}
{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Farley did not print it as an interlineation.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab SO HE SAYS. Perhaps at one of the hundred or shire courts where rival claims to land were discussed. Other examples of oral testimony in Dorset occur at 40,7. 54,8 and 55,3.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab AT THE [TIME OF HIS] DEATH. King Edward died on 5th January 1066.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab IN THE TIME OF [* EARL *] HAROLD. That is, from 6th January to 14th October 1086; see List 3 Harold note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab PREVIOUSLY IT WAS PASTURE, NOW ARABLE. One of the few explicit references in Domesday to colonization; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Domesday Geography of South-West England}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 110. Compare SUS 13,52 where land for 1 plough was pasture, but is now settled (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 hospitata}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ),}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and HEF 10,43 and HEF 10,43 settle note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\insrsid9113064 34,9\tab WYNFORD [EAGLE]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in Tollerford Hundred; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 35.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ALSTAN [* OF BOSCOMBE *]. See 34,1 Alstan note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 14 HIDES. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 xii. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 with }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ii }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 interlined to correct the figure to }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 xiiii}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{
\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 34,10\tab FROME [VAUCHURCH]. This }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Frome }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
falls in the text after Wynford Eagle which can probably be located in Tollerford Hundred. It seems to be needed to make up the Tax Return total for the hundred; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 133. In }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 425, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Frome }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is a fee of the honour of Strigoil (see 34,6 Ralph note), like Lytchett Matravers (34,5) and Elworth (34,13). In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 35, in Tollerford Hundred John }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de la Tour }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (who also holds Elworth) holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Frome Foechurch}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iv. (Edward I) no. 235.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ALSTAN [* OF BOSCOMBE *]. See 34,1 Alstan note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 34,11\tab [LONG] CRICHEL. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 This holding can be located by an analysis of the Tax Return for Knowlton Hundred where William's mother holds 7 \'bd hides in lordship; see 1,3 Crichel note. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 28, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Lang Kyrchil }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is held from the Earl Marshall (though a small Mortain fee), the other half of the village being held by John }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Gouys}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see 49,16 Crichel note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ALSTAN [* OF BOSCOMBE *]. See 34,1 Alstan note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 3 FEMALE SLAVES. The only occurrence in Domesday Dorset of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ancillae}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
whereas in Gloucestershire, for example, they occur very frequently. Their almost complete absence from Dorset does not mean that they did not exist, merely that they were not listed separately from the male equivalent (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 serui}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , 'slaves'). While much of the female population was not counted by Domesday, presumably since they were deemed not to contribute directly to the value or resources of the village, it would be expected that the female '
working population', like the male, would be; they are therefore likely to be disguised under general population categories which in the Latin of Domesday are masculine.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab NOW \'a315. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .xv. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 was corrected from }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .xii. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 by the main scribe of Great Domesday.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 34,12\tab `TARRANT'.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  An unidentified }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Tarente Grice }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is a Marshall fee in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 753.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab THOLF [* THE DANE *]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 34,2 Tholf note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 34,13\tab ELWORTH. 2 hides are held from the honour of Strigoil (Chepstow) in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 93, in 'Uggescombe' Hundred. John }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Turry }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 or 
}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de la Tour }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 holds in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 6, 34, 53; see 34,10 Frome note}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ALSTAN [* OF BOSCOMBE *]. See 34,1 Alstan note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 3 VILLAGERS. After these last words on folio 80d, the text of this entry continues on folio 82a, as the inserted piece of parchment (folio 81 ab, cd) contains DOR 42 and 36,4-11; see 36,4 entry note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 34,14\tab HUGH [* MALTRAVERS *]. See 34,14 Stock note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab STOCK [GAYLARD]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Probably the 'Stoke' near Stourton Caundle (34,15) which has the same holders in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 40. It was in Brunsell Hundred in 1316 (}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 40), then in Lydlinch, Sherborne Hundred; see F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 219. Like Lytchett Matravers (34,5) it is held by Hugh's descendants; see Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 683, who states that there was a 'Matravers farm' in this parish.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab THOLF [* THE DANE *]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 34,2 Tholf note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab THE LAND OF SHERBORNE. Perhaps meaning that it was held by Sherborne Abbey (DOR 2-3) or that it was taken from the many hides of Sherborne (2,6. 3,1).}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 34,15\tab HUGH [* MALTRAVERS *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab [STOURTON] CAUNDLE. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 26,70 Caundle note. The holding was probably adjacent to Stock Gaylard (34,14), the two being separated by the Caundle Brook; see Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 664.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab THOLF [* THE DANE *]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 34,2 Tholf note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 35\tab WILLIAM OF FALAISE.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  He was married to the daughter of Serlo of Burcy (SOM 27,3). William's daughter Emma married William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Curcy }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and the lands passed to the}{
\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Courcy family. Falaise is in the d\'e9partement of Calvados, France.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this chapter.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 35,1\tab SILTON. An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in Gillingham Hundred. The land included }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Poerstone}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Pierston Farm, ST7928]: }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 22, 32, 40, 52. Silton and Milton are held in}{\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 607, by Margery of Redvers, daughter of Alice }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Curcy}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , widow of Baldwin of}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Redvers, Earl of Devon.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab WULFWARD WHITE.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Uuit }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 here; also }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wit}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Wite}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 albus }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 elsewhere in Domesday. He is called a}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 thane of King Edward in MDX 8,5. See 1,30 Wulfgar note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab REEVE OF HIS. That is, a reeve of King Edward.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab BISHOP OF EXETER. Leofric, who was bishop from 1046 to 1072.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab MILTON[-ON-STOUR].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in Gillingham Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 36\tab WILLIAM OF MOHUN. In Domesday the forms are }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Moion}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Moiun}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; in Exon they are }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Moione}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Mouin}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Though he came from Moyon in the d\'e9
partement of Manche, France, he is rendered as William of Mohun here in deference to the more popular thirteenth-century spelling of the English form of his byname. He was sheriff of Somerset from }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 c}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
. 1068 and 'farmed' various royal manors there (see SOM 1,14 William note). Dunster in Somerset was the seat of his barony and his lands later formed the honour of Dunster.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 36,1\tab [Exon 47a2]
\par \tab TODBER. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Held from John }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Moun}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  in Gillingham Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 22, 33, 40, 52.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab FROM THE KING. Omitted from the corresponding entry in Exon; Exon very rarely notes that a manor is held 'from the king' and no further references to these omissions are made in these notes.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab GEOFFREY [!1! MALLORY !1!].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  In the corresponding entry in Exon }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Maloret}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 351.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 2 PLOUGHS ... THERE, IN LORDSHIP. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Geoffrey has 2 ploughs'; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 in dominio }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 perhaps}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 omitted in error.}{
\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE ... NOW \'a34. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .ii. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 with }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ii }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 interlined to correct the figure to }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .iiii.}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 .
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Value when W[illiam] acquired it' for Domesday's 'value was'. Similarly for the past values in}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 36,3-5;9.}{\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 36,2\tab [Exon 47b1]
\par \tab SPETISBURY. The corresponding entry in Exon has '... which a thane, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Alwardus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  (see 36,2 Aethelward note), held in 1066. It paid tax for 5 hides, 1 virgate and 6 acres. 4 \'bd
 ploughs can plough these. In the same village William has a manor which Godric held in 1066, which paid tax for 2 hides. 1 \'bd ploughs can plough these. William holds these two manors as one'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that this place lay in Charborough (later Loosebarrow) Hundred in 1086.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab AETHELWARD.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Ageluuard}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Exon }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Alwardus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 Agel- }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 here and in 55,14 indicate that his name was Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 \'c6thelweard}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; see von Feilitzen, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , \'a7 111 and pp. 188-89. Compare 3,1 Alward note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab PASTURE ... OVERLOOKING THE WATER. The River Stour winds slowly on the shallow valley floor at this point, nowadays being split into two channels in front of the village. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Aqua }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
was probably a stretch of marshland in 1086.
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The phrase 'overlooking the water' is omitted from the corresponding entry in Exon; see B4 Abbess note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Value when he acquired it', presumably referring to William (but see 55,29 value note and 55,30 value note). Likewise for the past values in 36,7-8.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 36,3\tab [Exon 47b2]
\par \tab WINTERBORNE [HOUGHTON].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Also }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Winterborn' Moyun}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 :}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 753, and simply }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Howeton }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
(in Pimperne Hundred) in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 27; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. (Edward I) nos. 306, 593; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 129. Maxwell Lyte, historian of the honour of Dunster, doubts this identification, considering that Winterborne Houghton was quite distinct from the original Mohun 'Winterborne'; see }{\insrsid9113064 
Maxwell Lyte, }{\i\insrsid9113064 Honour of Dunster}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. ii note 1.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab ALWARD HELD. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Alward held jointly (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 pariter}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab LAND FOR 2 PLOUGHS. In the corresponding entry in Exon, the 1 virgate held by Hugh of Boscherbert 'can be ploughed with 2 ploughs'. No mention is made of a plough estimate for the rest of the land.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab MEADOW, 2 ACRES; PASTURE, 6 FURLONGS; UNDERWOOD, 13 ACRES. The corresponding entry in Exon has }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 xiii. agros nem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 us}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 culi. & .vi. q}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 u}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 adrag}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 enarias}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\f820\cf1\insrsid9113064  pascu\'ea
. & .ii. agros}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The main scribe of Great Domesday, if copying directly from Exon (as seems very likely), supplied }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 prati }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 after }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .ii. agros}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 assuming that the Exon scribe had omitted it as he or his fellow scribes did on a number of occasions (possibly thinking it unnecessar
y in a list with a standard sequence of woodland - or underwood -, meadow, pasture; see DEV 1,46 woodland note). However, as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 prati }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
would thus be out of sequence and as acres are in Dorset several times linked with furlongs in measurements (see 5,1 woodland note), it is possible that the Exon scribe intended the pasture to measure 6 furlongs and 2 acres, but wrote the word }{
\i\f820\cf1\insrsid9113064 pascu\'ea }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 too early in error. See also 55,8 pasture note for a similar case.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 36,1 value note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab OF THESE ... WILLIAM. Ther
e is no apparent reason for the omission of this statement from Domesday: it was not added in Exon, the entry is neat and there is no change in scribe. However, this detail is recorded after the tax assessment there and perhaps the main scribe of Great Do
m
esday preferred to record this illegal holding at the end of the entry (where other such details are listed), but in his haste forgot to turn back to Exon folio 47b once he had reached the value statement on folio 48a. Support is lent to this suggestion b
y his initial omission of the following entries in Exon; see 36,4 entry note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab HOLDS 1 VIRGATE WRONGFULLY. See 55,17.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 36,4\tab [Exon 48a1]}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab THIS ENTRY and the next seven (36,5-11) were added by the main scribe of Great Domesday on a separate scrap 
of parchment, later numbered 81c,d, and are rubricated. Like DOR 42 on the reverse and 1,31 (folio 76) they are written acrosswise;}{\insrsid9113064  }{\f823\cf1\insrsid9113064 
see 1,31 entry note. He indicated their position after 36,3 with large transposition signs in the shape of a upsilon (\'f8) lyi}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ng on its side written in vermilion; Farley printed 'hands'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab The initial omission of these eight manors by the main scribe of Great Domesday is odd, if, as seems probable, he was copying from Exon (see \{Introduction: Exon Extra Information and Discrepancies}{\insrsid9113064 \}}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 
): he cannot have lost a folio or two from Exon, as in Exon the details of Winterborne Houghton (36,3) continue onto folio 48a and are immediately succeeded by those for Pulham, Hammoon (36,4-5) etc. (but see Finn, 'Immediate Sources' p. 70). It is po
ssible that the Domesday scribe broke off after 36,3 for some reason and when he resumed he mistakenly thought he had completed William's lands in Dorset and so began the next fief, but realized his error later.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab PULHAM. Domesday }{\i\insrsid9113064 Poleham}{\insrsid9113064 . It was tentatively identified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 93 no. 276, as Hazelbury Bryan and by }{\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}
{\insrsid9113064  as Pulham. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 This land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Hundesburge'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred. It lay some way to the west of the main body of the hundred, 
and was possibly a detach\-ment in 1086, later coming into [Buckland] Newton Hundred, where another part of Pulham lay in 1086. It is not found later in the Mohun fief and must soon have passed into other hands; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 100; }{\insrsid9113064 Maxwell Lyte, }{\i\insrsid9113064 Honour of Dunster}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. ii, 3.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab TWENTY-ONE THANES HELD. The corresponding entry in Exon adds '... jointly; they could go to whichever lord they would'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 
10 HIDES. The details of lordship and villagers' holdings suggest that there were 10 acres to a virgate (40 to a hide, instead of the more usually reckoned 120 acres; see B1 hides note). A 40-acre geld-hide is also implied in the Wiltshire Tax Return for 
C
alne Hundred, where one of the versions (Exon 13a5) has two parts of a virgate and one part of a virgate while the other two (Exon 1a4 and 7b1) have 7 acres and 3 acres (the virgate was always a quarter of a hide). Another 'small hide' of 48 acres for tax
 purposes has also been suggested; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dorset Survey}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 pp. 14-16. See SUS \{Appendix\}; Tait, 'Large Hides and Small Hides'; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Domesday Geography of South-West }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 England, pp. 80-81; Finn, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Liber Exoniensis}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 122-23. On a larger acre in Cornwall, see CON 1,1 a
cre note. However, there are several examples in Dorset where the details of the lordship and villagers' land do not add up to the tax total given; see 1,19 tax note and compare 36,5 tax note. Moreover, the Tax Return for 'Hundesburge'}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred states that William of Mohun's lordship land there is 4 \'bd
 hides less 4 acres, which then does add up to the 10 hides; this evidence, however, is not conclusive, because there are many discrepancies in the amount of lordship land in the Tax Return and in Domesday (even
 where a holding can be positively identified) and changes could have taken place between the dates of the two surveys.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab A GARDEN ... 3d. Interlined in the corresponding entry in Exon on 2 lines mostly in the right margin, perhaps the reason for its omiss
ion in Domesday. The scribe is the same as, and the ink only slightly different in colour to, the rest of the entry, and nothing indicates that the addition was a late one, after the manuscript had been used by the main scribe of Great Domesday. See DEV 3
,45 Barnstaple note and DEV 10,1 garden note where details of two gardens are also added later and compare B4 where a garden features in the information added by the Domesday scribe.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 36,1 value note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 36,5\tab [Exon 48a2]}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab HAMMOON. Earlier }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hamme Mohun}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 424; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 27, 43, 47; F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 54; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 99. It was a detachment of Pimperne Hundred in 1303 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 27) and was probably in 'Hundesburge'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred in 1086.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab GODRIC. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The corresponding entry in Exon has 'A thane called Godric'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab TAX FOR 5 HIDES. The details of lordship and villagers' land amount to 5 hides, less 4 acres. Although there are several instances in Dorset of the details not tallyin
g with the tax total (see 1,19 tax note), it is probable that in this case the Exon scribe wrote }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .viii. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 for }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .xii. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in the acreage, or vice versa.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 36,1 value note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 36,6\tab [Exon 48b1]
\par \tab CHILFROME.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Childefrome }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Crokeston' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Cruxton, 36,7] are Mohun holdings in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 424, and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 35; see }{\insrsid9113064 Maxwell Lyte,}{\i\insrsid9113064  Honour of Dunster}{\insrsid9113064 ,}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 passim}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; F
\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 229, 233. Since Chilfrome is later held as two fees and Cruxton as one, it is probabl
e that Cruxton is the smaller Domesday holding. Both can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Tollerford Hundred; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 133.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 4 VILLAGERS AND 7 SMALLHOLDERS. In the corresponding entry in Exon 2 cottagers are also recorded; see \{Appendix: Details Table\} and 1,15 smallholders note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab A MILL. In the corresponding entry in Exon two mills may be recorded: it is not clear whether the 18d Dodman and Nigel}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 each get from a mill is from the same mill. See \{
Appendix: Details Table\}.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab PASTURE 17 FURLONGS LONG AND AS WIDE. The two holdings of 8 \'bd furlongs in}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 length and width (see \{Appendix: Details Table\}) amount to half the Domesday measurement, as is}{
\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 also the case in 55,8 (see 55,8 pasture note).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab TWO MEN. Dodman and Nigel; see \{Appendix: Details Table\}.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WILLIAM CLAIMS THESE THREE MANORS AS TWO. He has combined the three manors of the three 1066 holders in Chilfrome into two manors, held by Dodman and Nigel; see\{Appendix: Details Table\}.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 36,7\tab [Exon 48b2]
\par \tab CRUXTON. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 36,6 Chilfrome note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ALWARD.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Aluuardus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Exon }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Ailuuardus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 . Von Feilitzen, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 188-189, listed them under Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 \'c6thelweard}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , presumably because of the Exon form. Exon also has the form }
{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Ailuuardus }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 for Domesday's }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Aluuard}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 us}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in 55,40-42 and }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Aelwardus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  for Domesday's }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Aluuard }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in 36,10. Domesday has the form }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Ailward }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
for 56,25. Compare 3,1 Alward note and 36,2 Aethelward note.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab However, in the present revision of the name-forms in Domesday it has been decided not to take account of variant forms found in 'satellite' texts such as Exon, the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Inquisitio Comitatus Cantabrigiensis}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Inquisitio Eliensis}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Domesday Monachorum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  etc. Compare 47,3 Alfrith note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 36,2 value note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 36,8\tab [Exon 49a1]
\par \tab CHELBOROUGH.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  The Mohun holding was West Chelborough: }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 35; }{\insrsid9113064 Maxwell Lyte, }{\i\insrsid9113064 Honour of Dunster}{\insrsid9113064 ,}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 passim}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 It can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Tollerford Hundred. It is possible that this land included }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Mellbyry Turberevyle }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Melbury Sampford], the next entry in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 35; see 26,35 Melbury note and 47,3 Chelborough note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WOODLAND ... WIDE. There is no obvious reason
 why the main scribe of Great Domesday omitted the woodland details: the corresponding Exon entry is fairly neat and written by just one scribe and the woodland appears in its usual place; it is possible, however, that as the detail occupies exactly one l
ine, the Domesday scribe merely skipped a line in error. Similar omissions for no apparent reasons occur for 55,16;29. Compare 12,3 villagers and also 36,3 meadow note and 36,4 garden note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 36,2 value note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab THE KING ... RIGHT. The corresponding entry in Exon has }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Rex u}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 er}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 o iussit ut i}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 n}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de rectu}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 m}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  habeat}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 3 HIDES ... 1 WHICH DID NOT PAY TAX. The same information is given in the Tax Return for Tollerford Hundred.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 36,9\tab [Exon 49a2]
\par \tab IWERNE [STEPLETON].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Stepelton' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is a Mohun fee in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 426, and held from John }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Mohun }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 27. See 30,3 Ranston note; Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 298, iv. p. 85.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 36,1 value note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 36,10\tab [Exon 49b1]
\par \tab LITTLEWINDSOR.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Parva Windelessor' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is a Mohun fee in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 426.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab ALWARD HELD. In the manuscript there is an }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 7}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  after the place-name which is partially covered by the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 A }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Aluuard
}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 presumably in an attempt to hide it. Farley did not show it. Compare 56,39 land note, 57,7 land note and 57,15 woodland note.
\par \tab \tab The corresponding entry in Exon adds '... and he could go to which lord he wished'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 36,11\tab [Exon 49b2]
\par \tab MAPPERTON. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Near Beaminster, held as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Mapelarton Bret }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 by William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 le Bret }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from the honour of Dunster (}{\insrsid9113064 Maxwell Lyte, }{
\i\insrsid9113064 Honour of Dunster}{\insrsid9113064 ,}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  p. 75), probably South Mapperton; see F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 272; Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 158.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ALMER}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  HELD. The corresponding entry in Exon adds '... and he could go to whichever lord he would'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 37\tab WILLIAM OF BRAOSE.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  From Briouze in the d\'e9partement of Orne, France. Most of his land}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 lay in Sussex.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this chapter.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 37,1\tab [GLANVILLES]}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  WOOTTON. The two estates here (37,1-2) can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Buckland [Newton] Hundred. Glanvilles Wootton is held as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wolfrenewotton }
{\cf1\insrsid9113064 by Henry }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Glaunvyle}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Brewes }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (Braose) in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 30; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 42, 50; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 59.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ABBOT OF MILTON.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Or perhaps 'Milton Abbey', as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 abb' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 can abbreviate both }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 abbas }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('abbot'),}{\insrsid9113064  }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 abbatia }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('abbey'), as well as occasionally }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 abbatissa}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  ('abbess'). The land was restored to the}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 abbey, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Wottingglayvile }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 being held by the abbot in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 184a.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 37,2\tab ALSO IN THIS VILLAGE. That is, in [Glanvilles] Wootton; see 37,1 Wootton note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 37,4\tab ASH. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Aisse}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 . It can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Pimperne Hundred, which states that the king has not had tax from 2 \'bd
 hides which David holds from William of Braose.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 1 PLOUGH THERE. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote a capital }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 I}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  for the usual }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 i}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Farley corrected the error.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 3 SLAVES. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 iii. serui}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Farley misprinted }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 iiii. serui}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 37,6\tab CREECH. Henry }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Glaunvile }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Crugh }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Hasler Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 37, from William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Breouse}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 37,7\tab AFFLINGTON. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 28,6 Afflington note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 37,9\tab W[ILLIAM] ALSO HOLDS. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Idem W. ten' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
. Or perhaps 'W[alter] also holds', referring to the subtenant of 37,6-8, although one would expect 'from William' to be added (but see GLS 48,3 Roger note and compare DOR 34,14 where }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Will'o}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 was interlined later). Compare 37,6 }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Idem W. ten' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 where the meaning is obviously 'William also holds'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab RUSHTON.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  It probably lay in Bere Hundred in 1086, see \{Introduction: Hundreds\}. One of the several holdings here was at, or included, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bennegere }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
[Binnegar, SY8787]: }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 42.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab BURDE HELD IT. Entered in the right margin of the manuscript with no transposition signs to indicate its correct position in the entry. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Burde }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is perhaps from Old French }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Burdel }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 burdo}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 'a mule') with Anglo-Norman loss of final }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 l}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
; see von Feilitzen, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 211. This is the only occurrence of this personal name in Domesday.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab SESTERS. See 12,12 sester note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 37,10\tab WORGRET}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  ... \'bd MILL. See 11,9 mill note. Henry }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Glanvill }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 holds Worgret in Barrow Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 42. One of the Worgret holdings (see also11,9 and 57,7) included Westport in Wareham (SY9287), }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Westeporte }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 42.}{\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\insrsid9113064 37,11\tab HETHFELTON.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  See 49,14 Hethfelton note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 37,12\tab SMEDMORE. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Metmore}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 86.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 37,13\tab IN PURBECK HUNDRED. Written in the same size ca
pitals as the other place-names, and lined through in red, not in large capitals as printed in Farley. Compare 1,30. It was apparently an alternative name for Ailwood Hundred (later named Rowbarrow Hundred); see 1,8 'Purbeck' note. It is perhaps significa
nt that the 7 hides less \'bd virgate of this land, combined with the 17 hides and \'bd
 virgate of Worth (47,9;11), the 3 virgates of Worth (55,43) and the odd 1 virgate of Renscombe (11,16), make a 25-hide unit. This would locate the land near Worth Matravers; see 37,13 wife note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab WIFE OF HUGH SON OF GRIP}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 HOLDS PART OF THIS LAND. The wife of Hugh held two places called 'Langton': Langton Herring (55,31) in her own fief and another 'Langton' in Purbeck. The salt from the salt-pans on this land was given by a des
cendant to Holme Priory (see DOR 55 wife note). This 'Langton' lay in Langton Matravers (SY9978) and was itself given to Ingram }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 le Waleys }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 whence it was called 'Langton Wallis' (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 24). It is possibly the land mentioned in the present entry or less likely a part of Worth Matravers (55,43) or of Acton in Langton Matravers (55,41); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, iii. p. 56 note 10; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. pp. 33-34; Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 630, iv. p. lxxvii.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 5 SMALLHOLDERS. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 v. bord' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 corrected from }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ii. bord'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; the main scribe of Great Domesday no doubt copied the }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ii.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  from the number of smallholders in the other part of this holding.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 38\tab WILLIAM OF ECOUIS. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Scohies}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Ecouis is in the d\'e9partement of Eure, France; see Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 114.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this chapter.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 38,1\tab [WEST] KNIGHTON. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 This land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Cullifordtree Hundred. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Chenistetone }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 means 'farm o
f the thegns or retainers of a high personage' (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 207) and probably refers to the holding by two thanes before 1066. East Knighton is in Winfrith Newburgh parish, Winfrith Hundred.}{
\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 5 VILLAGERS AND 5 SMALLHOLDERS. In the manuscript there is a small gap after }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 bord' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
due to the erasure of a couple of letters; Farley did not show it, as was frequently his practice with erasures. It is unlikely that the main scribe of Great Domesday intended to add }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 coscez }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('Cottagers') or }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 cotarii }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('cottagers'), as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 5, seems to think.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 38,2\tab [STOURTON] CAUNDLE. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 26,70 Caundle note. The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Brunsell Hundred, and the 5 hides are probably represented in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 89, by 2 \'bd hides held by Henry of Haddon from Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Malherbe }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and 2 \'bd
 hides held by Thomas son of Thomas son of Brian both at Stourton Caundle; see the Red Book of the Exchequer (Hall, ii. pp. 547-48).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 39\tab WALSCIN OF DOUAI. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 He is sometimes referred to by his name Walter (OG }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Walt}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 h}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 er}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 :}{\insrsid9113064  Forssner, }{\i\insrsid9113064 Continental-Germanic Personal Names}{\insrsid9113064 , p. 243}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
), as in Domesday Surrey and in some entries in Devon and Somerset (see SOM 24 Walter note), and sometimes, as here and in Domesday Wiltshire and some entries in Devon and Somerset, by the nickname variant of it (not discussed by von Feilitzen, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , }{\insrsid9113064 or Ellis, }{\i\insrsid9113064 General Introduction to Domesday Book}{
\insrsid9113064 ; Searle, }{\i\insrsid9113064 Onomasticon Anglo-Saxonum}{\insrsid9113064  is }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 misleading). }{\insrsid9113064 This }{\i\insrsid9113064 Walscin}{\insrsid9113064 
 appears to be the Norman French version of an Old German hypothetical }{\i\insrsid9113064 Walzin}{\insrsid9113064  (}{\i\insrsid9113064 sc}{\insrsid9113064  etc. for }{\i\insrsid9113064 z}{\insrsid9113064 ; see Zachrisson, }{\i\insrsid9113064 
Anglo-Norman Influence on English Place-Names}{\insrsid9113064 , pp. 37-38; von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid9113064 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\insrsid9113064 , pp. 110-11; Forssner, }{\i\insrsid9113064 Continental-Germanic Personal Names}{
\insrsid9113064 , p. 39, and compare his spellings for }{\i\insrsid9113064 Azelin}{\insrsid9113064 ) which would be a double-diminutive pet-form of }{\i\insrsid9113064 Walter}{\insrsid9113064 : an -}{\i\insrsid9113064 in}{\insrsid9113064 
 suffix derivative (see Forssner, }{\i\insrsid9113064 Continental-Germanic Personal Names}{\insrsid9113064 , pp. 278-79) of the recorded -}{\i\insrsid9113064 z}{\insrsid9113064  suffix form }{\i\insrsid9113064 Walz}{\insrsid9113064 (}{\i\insrsid9113064 e}
{\insrsid9113064 ); see Bach, }{\i\insrsid9113064 Personennamen}{\insrsid9113064 , I, i, paragraphs 97.1 and 100.2.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab Douai (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dwai}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Duai}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Douuai }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Domesday; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 duaco }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Exon for Somerset and Devon) is in the d\'e9partement of Nord in France; see Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 87.
\par \tab \tab No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this chapter.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 39,1\tab `WINTERBORNE'.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Neither the river nor the hundred has been identified.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab ALWARD AND ALWIN HELD. The main scribe of Great Domesday originally wrote }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Aluuard tenuit}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and then added 7 }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Aluuin }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 above and corrected the verb to the plural }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 tenuer'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
For a similar omission and consequent correction, see 57,1 held note. Alwin and Alward may have been brothers, or father and son, or close relatives, with common prototheme in their personal name, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Aethel- }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 or}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  A elf-}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 39,2\tab "}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 WIMER". Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wimer' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 might represent Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wigm\'e6r}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, though if an abbreviation sign were omitted over the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 i}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  at some stage, Old German }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Winemar}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  could be meant.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab [STOURTON] CAUNDLE. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 This land has not been identified in later records; see 26,70 Caundle note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ALSI <OF CASTLE CARY>. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 40\tab WALERAN ^[THE HUNTER]^. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Waleran the hunter, as in the Landholders' List on folio 75a. His lands later formed the Barony of Dean (40,3 Sutton note) and descendants, Walter }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Walerand }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 and William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Sancto Martino}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 are found holding some of his lands }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 passim }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this chapter.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 40,1\tab WALERAN. In the manuscript and Farley }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 WALERAN'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
the Ordnance Survey facsimile fails to reproduce the abbreviation sign. Compare 34,1 William note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab MANSTON. A fee of the heir of Waleran in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 753; held in Gillingham Hundred from William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Sancto Martino }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 22. See }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 425; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 33, 52.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 40,2\tab KINGTON.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Probably in both Great Kington and Little Kington. Little Kington Farm (Kington Parva) in West Stour parish is a fee held from the heir of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Waleran'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  in}
{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 753; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 22, 33, 52; and 32,1 Kington note and 56,2 Kington note. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. (Edward I) no. 7, Maud late wife of Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Waleraund }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 holds one-third of Kington manor, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Little Kyngton}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and one-third of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Mangirston }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Madjeston in Gillingham, ST8025, probably a part of Gillingham (1,4) in 1086].}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 40,3\tab SUTTON [WALDRON]. The affixed name is derived from Waleran, the 1086 holder, or from the early thirteenth-century }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Walerand}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
The land is held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 91, of the heirs of Walter }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Walerant}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}
{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 21, is held by William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Sancto Martino }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from the barony of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dene }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
(now East Dean and West Dean on the Hampshire/Wiltshire border). The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Farrington Hundred.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 40,4\tab `WINTERBORNE'. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Probably Winterborne Muston or Winterborne Tomson, or both, held in 1242-1243 as Winterborne }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Turbervill' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and Winterborne }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Thom'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 a fee of the heir of Waleran: }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 753; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 426; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 39, 43, 48; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, iii. p. 135 note 82. Winterborne Tomson remained in Combsditch Hundred; Winterborne Muston was later in Bere Hundred, but a tithing of Combsditch Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 40,6\tab FIFEHEAD [NEVILLE]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 'Five Hides', held at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Vyfhyde Nevyle }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Pimperne Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 27, from Reginald }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Sancto Martino}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 425. Its hidage seems required to make up the Tax Return total for 'Hundesburge'}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred, whereas Fifehead St Quintin (19,9) can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for [Sturminster] Newton Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 40,7\tab [CHURCH] KNOWLE.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  So identified by }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 96 no 308, and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
. There are a number of other places called Knowle or Knoll in Dorset and no evidence has been found to confirm Waleran's holding here; see Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 578.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab HE WAS FREE WITH THIS LAND. He was free to choose any lord; see 1,29 holders note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab EARL WILLIAM. William son of Osbern (William Fitz Os
bern), brother of Bishop Osbern of Exeter, 'palatine' earl of Hereford from 1067 to his death in battle abroad in 1071. He was most probably also 'palatine' earl of Gloucestershire, and wielded extra powers in Worcestershire; see Wightman, 'Palatine Earld
om of William Fitz Osbern'. William was joint 'regent' with Bishop Odo of Bayeux during King William's absence in 1067 and was responsible (with Walter of Lacy and others) for defending the Welsh border. See HEF \{Introduction: History\}
. He was married to Adeline, sister of Ralph of Tosny. Like Ralph of Lim\'e9sy (see 34,6 Ralph note), Earl William may have held much land in Dorset, but this is the only hint of it in Domesday Dorset.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 40,8\tab [MAIDEN] NEWTON. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 This holding seems to be required to make up the total hidage of the Tax Return for Tollerford Hundred.. It is held as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Mayden Nywton }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 35, from John }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Engham }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 who holds other lands (Kington and Winterborne Tomson 40,2;4) from William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Sancto Martino}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; see DOR 40 Waleran note; Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 682.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 40,9\tab TOLLER.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  P
robably in Tollerford Hundred like the previous entry and thus distinct from Toller Whelme (26,66). There are later two distinct settlements, Toller Porcorum and Toller Fratrum or Great Toller and Little Toller, one of which, and possibly both, represents
 the present Domesday entry; see Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 696; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dorset Survey}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 139-40; F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 235. Walter }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Walerand }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Tore }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 426, possibly the same land that is held from Richard }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Tolre }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Swyne Tolre }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Toller Porcorum] in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. pp. 35, 55, in Tollerford Hundred. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ix. (Edward III) no. 118, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Swyntolre }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is held by the heir of Oliver }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Hyngram}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in a separate entry it is associated with }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Mayden Nywton }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (40,8).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 41\tab WALTER OF CLAVILLE.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 De Clavile }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 here and in the Landholders' List on folio 75a, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Clayilla }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Exon and }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Clavilla }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in the Tax Returns. His place of origin is either Claville-sur-Cany or Claville-Motteville, both in the d\'e9partement of Eure, France; see Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Old English Bynames}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 82; and 41,1 Walter note. Walter's descendants became tenants of the honour of Gloucester, East Holme and Morden (41,3;5) being held by them in 1285 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 24); see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 750.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 41,1\tab [Exon 62a1]}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WALTER OF GLANVILLE OR ^[WALTER]^ OF CLAVILLE. In the manuscript [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ve}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 l Clavile }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is interlined, probably in correction, although }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Glanvile }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 has not been underlined for deletion. The }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 vel }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 l}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  with an abbreviation line through it)}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is not well written (probably because of lack of space, having been added after the rubricated heading), but it is unlikely that it stood for }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 id est }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('that is') rather than }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 vel }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('or'). It does not appear in the corresponding entry in Exon.}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 A Robert of Glanville (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Glanuill'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  de Glauilla}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 d\'e9
partement of Calvados, France) appears frequently in Domesday, but only in Suffolk and, to a lesser extent, in Norfolk, whereas Walter of Claville is a tenant-in-chief in Devon and Dorset and a subtenant in Cornwall. A Robert of C
laville also occurs in Domesday Suffolk. Glanville and Claville are far apart in different d\'e9partements in France. It is likely, therefore, that we are dealing not with a double name here, but with a simple error. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 C }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 G }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 are similar in the script used in Domesday and an abbrevi\-ation sign could easily have been added: thus }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Clavile }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 > }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Glavile }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 > }{\i\f827\cf1\insrsid9113064 Gl\'e2vile }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 > }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Glanvile}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
The main scribe of Great Domesday, not sure whether this was a different holder, decided to include the alternative reading, presumably as a result of further checks made.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 This fief becomes part of the honour of Gloucester, the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Clavile }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 family continuing as tenants.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab AFFLINGTON. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 28,6 Afflington note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab BRICTRIC [* SON OF ALGAR *].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Most probably Brictric son of Algar (1,17 Brictric note): he was Walter's predecessor in DEV 24,21 and CON 1,19.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab IN LORDSHIP 2 PLOUGHS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Walter has 2 ploughs'; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 in dominio }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 perhaps omitted in error or implied.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab PASTURE, 4 FURLONGS IN LENGTH AND WIDTH. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'pasture, 4 furlongs in both length}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and width'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Value when W[alter] acquired it'. Likewise for the past values in 41,2-5.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 41,2\tab [Exon 62a2]
\par \tab [CHURCH] KNOWLE. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 It can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Hasler Hundred. The 1066 holder Beorn seems to have given his name to Barnston Farm (SY9381); see F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 132; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 88.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab BEORN <OF KNOWLE>.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  The corresponding entry in Exon has 'A thane, Beorn'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab The name Beorn occurs three times in Domesday Book, on widely separated holdings of modest size which devolved upon different tenants-in-chief, making it probable that each was held by a different individual (JP).}{
\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 41,3\tab [Exon 62a3]
\par \tab [EAST] HOLME. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Both Walter's holding and that of 56,43 can be
 identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Hasler Hundred. East Holme remained in that hundred; West Holme was in East Stoke parish, Winfrith Hundred, although a tithing of Hasler Hundred; see \{Introduction: Tithings\}. In }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 24, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Holne }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is held from the honour of Gloucester by William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Clavile }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Hasler Hundred; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 750.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ALDRED [!1! A THANE !1!]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Aldred, a thane'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 41,4\tab [Exon 62b1]
\par \tab COOMBE [KEYNES]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in Winfrith Hundred; see 6,4 Coombe note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab TWO THANES HELD. The corresponding entry in Exon adds 'jointly'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 41,5\tab [Exon 62b2]
\par \tab MORDEN. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Charborough (later Loosebarrow) Hundred. It is probable that it covered both East Morden and West Morden, the former a part of Loosebarrow Hundred in later times, the latter a tithing in Ru
shmore Hundred (see \{Introduction: 'New' Hundreds\}). In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 24, West Morden in Rushmore Hundred is held by John }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Clavyle }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
from the Earl of Gloucester (see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 37, 56); while in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 44, John }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Glaunvile }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
holds from the Earl of Gloucester in Loosebarrow Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab FOUR THANES HELD. The corresponding entry in Exon adds 'jointly'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 42\tab THIS CHAPTER was written by the main scribe of Great Domesday on the other side of the scrap of parchment (folio 81ab) to 36,4-11; see 1,31 entry note and 36,4 entry note. It is written in 2 \'bd
 lines with heading and is rubricated.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab No corresponding entry in Exon survives for this chapter.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab BALDWIN ^[THE SHERIFF]^. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Baldwin of Moeles (now Meulles in the d\'e9partement of Calvados, 
France) also known as Baldwin of Clare, and as Baldwin of Exeter (in the Landholders' List on folio 75a). He was the younger son of Count Gilbert of Brionne; his elder brother}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Richard (also known as Richard of Clare, and Richard of Tonbridge) was a landhol
der in Domesday Wiltshire, Devon, Bedfordshire. etc. Baldwin was delegated with other leading men-at-arms to help build a castle at Exeter after the revolt of 1068 and to remain there as part of the garrison (Orderic Vitalis, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Ecclesiastical History}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , (Chibn
all, ii. pp. 214-15)) and the custody of the castle remained in his family. He also had his own castle at Okehampton (DEV 16,3) and became a great landholder in that county. He was sheriff of Devon by 1070 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 i. no. 58 pp. 15
-16) and no doubt held the office until his death some time before 1096 when his son William is addressed in a charter together with Bishop Osbern and Warin the sheriff of Cornwall (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 497). Baldwin was married to a cousin of King William. His heirs were the Courtenay family.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 42,1\tab IWERNE [COURTNEY]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 This manor can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Farrington Hundred, and is held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 91 (as }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Ywern'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ),}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 21 (as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Iwerne Cortenai}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ),}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from the honour of Okehampton. It is also called Shroton ['sheriff's }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 tun}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from Baldwin the sheriff; see F\'e4gersten, 
}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 10; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 260; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 32, 40, 52. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 33, land at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Childakford }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Child Okeford: 1,7 Okeford note] is held from Hugh }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Cortenay}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 possibly a part of this holding; see 44,1 Hill note. For the constituents of this estate, see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. (Edward I) no. 71.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 43\tab LAND OF BERENGAR GIFFARD. No corresponding entry in Exon survives for this chapter.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 43,1\tab BREDY.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  In Burton Bradstock parish. It can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Goderthorn' Hundred; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 11, 34, 54.}{
\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab HARDING [* SON OF ALNOTH *].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  According to the Tax Return for 'Goderthorn' Hundred, Berengar's predecessor (who is not named) holds of him at a revenue (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 tenet}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ... }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ad firmam}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; this sentence is interlined by the scribe of the entry); Berengar's lordship is there given as 1 \'bd hides and the third part of 1 virgate.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab }{\insrsid9113064 The name Harding occurs on 48 holdings in Domesday Book, probably representing six or seven individuals. Peter Clarke has assigned all 33 }{\i\insrsid9113064 T.R.E.}{\insrsid9113064 
 holdings in Great Domesday to Harding son of Alnoth (Clarke, }{\i\insrsid9113064 English Nobility}{\insrsid9113064 , pp. 282-83), while Katharine Keats-Rohan has attributed 15 of the 17 1086 tenancies to the same man (}{\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday People}
{\insrsid9113064 , p. 244). Of the other two, Ann Williams (}{\i\insrsid9113064 The English and the Norman Conquest}{\insrsid9113064 , p. 120 note 125) has shown that the Berksh
ire holding was probably held by the individual who held in Dorset and Wiltshire in 1086, and seventeenth tenancy was held by a burgess of Oxford. The grounds for the majority of these attributions have not been stated but are relatively easy to reconstru
ct. 29 of the 33 }{\i\insrsid9113064 T.R.E.}{\insrsid9113064 
 holdings in Great Domesday were connected in some way with Earl Aubrey of Coucy. Three of these (WIL 67,60-62) were held by Harding at both dates, as were three of the remaining four holdings without the Coucy link. As the survival o
f more than one Englishman with an uncommon name holding the same properties at both dates within a limited area is improbable, all six properties may have been held by the same individual. The final 1066 holding, at Winterslow (20,6) was connected indire
c
tly to the other 32: Harding held another property in the same vill (WIL 23,3), one which also devolved upon Aubrey de Coucy. All 33 1066 holdings therefore probably belonged to one man. Of the 1086 tenancies, Harding is named as the son of Alnoth in the 
S
omerset holdings, which descended to the Merriott family through his eldest son Nicholas (SOM 47,3-8). The remaining properties in Berkshire, Dorset, Somerset, and Wiltshire have been discussed above, leaving those in Buckinghamshire, Gloucestershire, Ham
pshire, and Warwickshire to be accounted for. Ann Williams has suggested that the Gloucestershire Harding is the son of Alnoth, on grounds of proximity to the family's Bristol base (}{\i\insrsid9113064 The English and the Norman Conquest}{\insrsid9113064 
, p. 120); his connections with other ro
yal manors and with Queen Edith offer a possible link with the Hampshire holding (HAM 6,1); and the Warwickshire holding lay between those held by Harding in the county in 1066 (WAR 17,30). The two modest, adjacent Buckinghamshire holdings have no discern
i
ble links to other Harding properties and may have belonged to another English survivor. Doubts have been raised about the identification of the 1066 landholder with Harding son of Alnoth, however, principally on the grounds that William of Malmesbury rep
orts him to have been active in the 1120s (}{\i\insrsid9113064 Gesta Regum}{\insrsid9113064 , p. 471), too old to have held land before the Conquest (Lewis, }{\cf17\insrsid9113064 'Formation of the Honour of Chester',}{\insrsid9113064 
 pp. 67-68). But the tenurial history of Beechingstoke (WIL 12,1) tends to confirm the identification
. Harding held this manor in 1066, and Harding son of Alnoth was litigating about it in the reign of Henry I. Moreover, the tenant-in-chief of Beechingstoke was Shaftesbury Abbey, to which Harding son of Alnoth donated land when his daughter became a nun 
there: Williams, }{\i\insrsid9113064 The English and the Norman Conquest}{\insrsid9113064 , pp. 120-21 (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE \'a33. Almost certainly }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Valet }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is a scribal error for }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Valuit }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('The value was').}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 44\tab LAND OF OSBERN GIFFARD. No corresponding entry in Exon survives for this chapter.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 44,1\tab [GOLD] HILL?. Domesday }{\i\insrsid9113064 Hille}{\insrsid9113064 . }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 This 'Hill' was identified by }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Dorset Survey}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 pp. 125-26, F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, iii. p. 97 no 318, with Hill farm (ST8814) in Iwerne Minster. Despite the arguments of Drew, \lquote Manors of the Iwerne Valley\rquote , and although Hill in Iwerne Minster is said by Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii p. 540, to have belonged to the Courtenays, Earls of Devon (which suggests that it was part of Iwerne Courtney, 42,1), the Hill in Iwerne Minster pr
obably lay in Sixpenny Hundred in 1086 and would have been surveyed as an unspecified part of Iwerne Minster (19,7). Osbern Giffard's 'Hill' is clearly identifiable from an analysis of the Tax Return for Farrington Hundred which later merged with Gillingh
am Hundred; Osbern is called }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Osbertus }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 there (see DEV 43 Osbern note for other examples of Osbern/ Osbert). In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 33, Ralph }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Hulle }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 holds Child Okeford from the Count of Mortain, and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hulle }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from the heirs of John }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Giffard }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Gillingham Hundred.
}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 'Hill' is thus likely to be near Child Okeford and has been tentatively identified with Gold Hill. The same holding is called Hill }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Parva }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 52. See }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , vii. (Edward III) no. 78.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 45\tab ALFRED OF `SPAIN'.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Omitted in error from the Landholders' List on folio 75a, where number }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 XLV}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  is Matthew of Mortagne (number }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 XLVI}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064  in the text). The numbering of the text thus continues one ahead of the Landholders' List until chapter 56 where the numbering tallies because the main scribe of Great Domesday gave no chapter number to the Land of Isolde (number }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 LV}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  in the Landholders' List).}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab Alfred came from Epaignes in the d\'e9partement of Eure, France (Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 92, 134); he is called }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hispaniensis }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 (in the chapter heading the second }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 i }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 was probably omitted in error), also }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Hispania }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 elsewhere in Domesday; this is 
a kind of word-play. He also held land in Devon, Somerset, Wiltshire, Gloucestershire and Herefordshire.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab No corresponding entry in Exon survives for this chapter.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 45,1\tab ALWY [* SON OF BANNA *].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Aluui }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 represents Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 \'c6lfwig }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 \'c6thelwig}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see von Feilitzen, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 157-58. As with }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Aluuardus }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
(see 3,1 Alward note) safety indicates keeping to the base form. This Alwy was undoubtedly the same as Alfred's predecessor }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Aluui }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in his lands in Somerset, Devon and}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Wiltshire, and who on several occasions in Domesday Somerset is called Alwy son of Banna and may also have been Alwy the king's reeve; see SOM 35,1 Alwy note and SOM 35,24 Alwy note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab PASTURE ... 4 IN WIDTH. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 IN }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is interlined, the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 I }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 extending down after }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 iiii. }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 and the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 N }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 being attached to the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 l }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 lat'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Farley printed }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 In }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 interlined.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 46\tab MATTHEW OF MORTAGNE. Mortagne is in the d\'e9partement of Manche, France.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 46,1\tab MILBORNE [ST ANDREW].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  The two Milborne parishes lay adjacent to ea
ch other, but in different hundreds, mainly divided from each other by a tributary of the River Piddle, but Milborne St Andrew parish in its northern part extended both sides of the stream. Milborne St Andrew was in Puddletown Hundred, Milborne Stileham i
n Bere Hundred; see 54,12 Milborne note and 56,53 Milborne note. Since 1933 Milborne Stileham has been incorporated in Milborne St Andrew. The present Milborne can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for}{\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 Puddletown Hundred and is held there from William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Le Moyne }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 16. The same man names Owermoigne (46,2). The northern part of Milborne St Andrew parish was called Milborne Deverel. Although included by }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 306, and F\'e4gersten, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 173, in Puddletown Hundred, it lay in Barrow Hundred (a later subdivision of Bere Hundred) in the Middle Ages and may represent the holding at 54,12. Elias }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
de Deverel }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Muleborn }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 37, 42, 56. The land included Deverel farm (SY8098
) and perhaps a part of Winterborne Whitechurch; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 44.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this chapter.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab JOHN [* THE DANE *].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Probably John the Dane, one of the predecessors of Matthew of Mortagne in}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Somerset and probably also in Gloucestershire.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par \tab \tab Identified in Exon for Clevedon (SOM 44,1) as the predecessor of Matthew of Mortagne who also succeeded him in Dorset and Gloucestershire. Peter Clarke, }{\i\insrsid9113064 English Nobility}{\insrsid9113064 , p. 316, note
s that Matthew was preceded by two other Danes, Strang and Thorkil who, he suggests, may have been related to John (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 46,2\tab OWERMOIGNE. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Ogre}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The holding can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Chilbury Hundred. Ralph }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Monachus }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Oweres }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Winfrith Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 89; see the Red Book of the Exchequer (Hall, ii. p. 547); }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 260, 1387. William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 le Moinne }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 holds in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 9.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab JOHN [* THE DANE *]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 46,1 John note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 47\tab ROGER ARUNDEL.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Arundel }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Domesday, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Arundellus }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Exon, from Old French }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 arondel}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 'little}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 swallow' (Modern French }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 hirondelle}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
'swallow'), ultimately from Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 hirundo}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; see Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 359. There is no connection with the Sussex place-name nor the E
arls of Arundel. Roger's lands later formed the honour of Powerstock, being then held by the Newburgh or Fitzpaine families.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par \tab \tab }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 This fief is entered in Exon under the heading of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Terra Rogerii Arundelli de Dorseta}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  meaning, if literally translated, 'Land of R
oger Arundel of Dorset'. This is potentially ambiguous, as it might imply that Roger Arundel was also known as Roger Arundel of Dorset. A parallel instance is the heading in Exon corresponding to DOR 48: }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Terram}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064  (for }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Terra}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Serlonis de Burceio de Dorseta}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 : '
Land of Serlo of Burcy of Dorset'. Neither man is ever titled 'of Dorset' elsewhere and neither is known to have had an official position in the county which might justify such an appellation. In effect the Latin preposition }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064  is being used as a substitute for }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 in}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , which is much more usual in such headings (see DOR 1 king note). The use of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 arises from phrases such as in HUN D7 }{\i\f827\cf1\insrsid9113064 Terr\'e2 Alurici de Gellinge 7 Emingeforde}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  ('[they testify that] the lands of Aelfric in Yelling and Hemingford') where the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064  has t
he sense of 'consisting of'. Used with the name of a county, the preposition is rather stretched ('Land of Roger of Arundel, consisting of Dorset'), but the usage is adequate, especially if it was an addition; see HUN D7 Aelfric note.}{\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\insrsid9113064 47,1\tab [Exon 50a1]
\par \tab WYNDLAM.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Windelham}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 whose hidage seems to be needed to complete the sum of hides in the Tax Return for Gillingham Hundred. }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Winesham }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is a fee of Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Novo Burgo }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 751.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab ALNOTH HELD. The corresponding entry in Exon adds 'and he could go to whichever lord he would'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Value when R[oger] acquired it'. Likewise for the past value in 47,2.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ROGER [!1! "DE MARGELLA" !1!].}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 It has not proved possible to identify this place-name. A descendant, William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Margellis}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is a tenant in Dorset in the Red Book of the Exchequer (Hall, i. p. 217).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 47,2\tab [Exon 50a2]
\par \tab MELBURY.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  The land was at Melbury Bubb, held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 94, by William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bubbe }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
from Robert of Newburgh. It can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Yetminster Hundred; see 26,35 Melbury note. From }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 36, it seems that the land may have included }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Batecumbe }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Batcombe, ST6104].}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab ROGER ... VIRGATE. In the corresponding entry in Exon }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 in dominio }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('in lordship') is probably omitted in error or implied.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 47,1 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 47,3\tab [Exon 50a3]
\par \tab CHELBOROUGH. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 36,8 Chelborough note. This land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Tollerford Hundred and is probably East Chelborough. Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 filius Pagani }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Chawberge }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 35, 55; see Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 652.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ALFRITH <OF PIDDLETRENTHIDE>. The Domesday forms here and in 47,4;9 are}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Aluert}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Aieluert}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 Ailuert}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; those in the corresponding entries in Exon are }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Ailuert }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Agelferdus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 . In the Phillimore printed edition, following von Feilitzen, 
}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 183, this name was given as Aethelfrith. However, von Feiltitzen was influenced by the presence of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 i }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 e }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 before the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 l}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  and by the Exon form }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Agelferdus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
. In the present revision of the Domesday name-forms it has been decided not to take account of variant forms found in 'satellite' texts such as Exon, the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Inquisitio Comitatus Cantabrigiensis}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , the }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Inquisitio Eliensis}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Domesday Monachorum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  etc. Moreover, JRM did not accept that the form }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Ai}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 e}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 luert}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  represented Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 \'c6thelfrith}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  because of the lack of medial }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 -d- }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 -g-}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  in it. Compare 36,7 Alward note.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid1786625 \tab \tab }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 This holder was identified by Round in VCH }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Somerset }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 i. p. 419, as the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Aeilferth minister}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
who witnessed King Edward's grant of Ashwick (SOM 7,15) to Bath Abbey in 1061. See also Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Somerset Survey}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 156. For his identification as Alfrith <of Piddletrenthide> by JP, see 9,1 Alfrith note.}{
\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab MEADOW, 2 ACRES. So in the Exon manuscript for the corresponding entry; Ellis misprinted }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 vi}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab UNBROKEN MARES. Exon }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 indomitas equas }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (accusative), probably the same as the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 siluestres equae}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 'wild mares' or forest ponies, which occur elsewhere in Exon.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Value when he acquired it', presumably referring to Roger (but see 55,29 value note). Likewise for the past values in 47,4-7;9.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 47,4\tab [Exon 50b1]
\par \tab ROBERT [!1! TILLY !1!]. I}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 n the Exon manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 atilet }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 here (or possibly }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 attlet}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , as Ellis printed) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 atillet }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 for 47,10. Perhaps this is an unexplained surname of local type, from the Old English preposition }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 aet }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('at') with some such word as, say, Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 hlet }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('a share', 'a portion', 'an allotment', 'an estate'), or (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ge}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 laet}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 e}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('a mill-leat or conduit', 'a crossroads'). However, the manor is later in the hands of the Tilly family, so it is possible that }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 atil}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 l}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 et }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is a variant of that surname. Tilly, Old French }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Tilie}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  de Tilli}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
is derived from either Tilly-sur-Seulles, in the French d\'e9partement of Calvados, or Tilly, in that of Eure. The place-name }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Tilly }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 belongs to a type derived from Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 tilius }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 (feminine), 'a lime-tree'. The form }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 atil}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 l}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 et }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 represents Old French }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 \'e0
 tillet }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ad tiletum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 meaning '(place) at a grove of lime-trees'. A Ralph of Tilly (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Tilio}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; see Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 115; Reaney, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dictionary of British Surnames}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , under the name 
Tilly) is found as a subtenant of Tavistock Abbey in the Exon for Devon; see DEV }{\insrsid9113064 \{Appendix: Details Table\}}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  under DEV 5,1.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab [LANGTON LONG] BLANDFORD.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  This is held as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Langeblaneford' Tilly }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from Margery }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Paganus }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 752; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 88; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 43; the Red Book of the Exchequer (Hall, ii. p. 548). She also holds Worth Matravers (47,9) and Rollington (47,10). See 26,29 Blandford note; Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 282.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ALFRITH <OF PIDDLETRENTHIDE>. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 47,3 Alfrith note and 9,1 Alfrith note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab TAX FOR 5 HIDES. Only the lordship land (4 hides) is detailed in the corresponding entry in Exon, the villagers' land holding being omitted; see 1,18 tax note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 15 PIGS. In the corresponding entry in the Exon manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 xii.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  was}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 written originally, but an attempt made to correct it to }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 xv.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  by joining together the two minims.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 47,3 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 47,5\tab [Exon 50b2]
\par \tab BEXINGTON.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bexinton' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is a fee of Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Novo Burgo }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 751, and is held in 'Uggescombe' Hundred from Matilda }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Arundel }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 7. From }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 94, it would appear to have included }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Luk' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Look farm in Puncknowle, SY5488] and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Notinton' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [identified by F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 153, and by }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 200, as Nottington in Broadwey, SY6682, far distant from Bexington].}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab AELMER [* ALMER <OF PIDDLETRENTHIDE> *]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 On this identification by JP, see 9,1 Alfrith note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 9 \'bd HIDES. The details in Exon add up to 9 hides, less \'bd virgate. See 1,19 tax note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 47,3 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 47,6\tab [Exon 50b3]}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab POWERSTOCK. The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Eggardon Hundred and is held in the same hundred by Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Novo Burgo }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from Roger }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Arundel }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 2. It included }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wytherstone }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Wytherston farm, SY5397]; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 93; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i.}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 p. 97; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 33, 53.}{\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab AELMER [* ALMER <OF PIDDLETRENTHIDE> *] . }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 On this identification by JP, see 9,1 Alfrith note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 47,3 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 47,7\tab [Exon 51a1]
\par \tab RALPH HOLDS ... 10 HIDES. Domesday implies that Ralph holds all of Wraxall at 10 hides from Roger and that William's 3 hides and the man-at-arms' hide are separate. However, in the c
orresponding entry in Exon Ralph holds only 6 hides in Wraxall, William and the man-at-arms holding the remaining 4 hides of the 10 hides taxed. See SOM 36,7 Bernard note and DEV 34,27 William note for similar examples of the main scribe of Great Domesday
 giving as the 1086 holder of the whole of a manor someone who held only a part of it.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab WRAXALL. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in Eggardon Hundred. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wroxhale }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is a fee of Roger of Arundel in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 3. Subdivisions of the holding (possibly the lands of William or the man-at-arms) were at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Stapelford }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ['Stapleford', lost in Hooke; see F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 240] and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Nether Keinecumb}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Lower Kingcombe, SY5599, later in Toller Porcorum parish, Tollerford Hundred,}{\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 formerly in Eggardon Hundred]; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 94, 751; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 2, 33, 53; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , v.}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (Edward II) no. 607; and 1,2 Bradpole note, 32,3 Kingcombe note and 40,9 Toller note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab AELMER [* ALMER <OF PIDDLETRENTHIDE> *] . }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 On this identification by JP, see 9,1 Alfrith note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 4 SLAVES. In the manuscript only the top half of the first }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 i }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 iiii. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is there, perhaps added to}{\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 an original }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 iii}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 It is unlikely to be an enlarged }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 punctus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , as 
the main scribe of Great Domesday did not usually have one}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 before a number when it succeeded an }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 7}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 . Farley read it as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 iiii}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}
{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab WILLIAM [* THE GOAT *]}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  HOLDS. Perhaps William the goat (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 cap}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ra}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ],}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 not }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 cap}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ru}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 as Ellis printed)}{\insrsid9113064  from }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
whom in the Tax Return for Eggardon Hundred the king has not had tax on the 3 \'bd hides}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (not 3 hides as here) that he holds from Roger Arundel.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab ALSO IN THIS VILLAGE. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'in the same manor'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 3 HIDES ... 4 VILLAGERS. VALUE \'a33. The corresponding entry in Exon has '4 villagers have these 3 hides for \'a33 in tribute' (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de gablo}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
). From this it would seem likely that the villagers held the 3 hides at a}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 revenue, that is, for a money rent. Compare 56,39 where 6 men hold 1 hide in Ringstead 'at a}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
revenue'. See 1,7 value note and compare 47,7 man-at-arms note, 57,2 smallholders note and 57,17 men note. For clear}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
examples of land being 'farmed' by the villagers, see the Exon addition to DEV 25,28 and DEV 26,1, also MDX 3,17, KEN 5,154 and
, probably, SUR 8,29. See also DEV 21,11 villager note, DEV 25,28 pays note and DEV 34,14 villager note. See Hoyt, 'Farm of the Manor'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab A MAN-AT-ARMS ... VALUE 20s. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'In the same village Roger gave 1 hide to a man-at-arms,}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from whom he has 20s'.}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
From this it would seem that the 20s was a money rent; see}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 47,7 hides note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab IN TOTAL, VALUE ... \'a39. That is, the sum of the values of the 3 \'bd hides of lordship land, of the 2 \'bd hides held by the villagers, of William's 3 hides and of the man-at-arms' hide.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WHEN HE ACQUIRED IT. Although }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Q'do recep' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (Domesday and Exon) could be extended to}{\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 quando recepta }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 est}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 'when [the manor; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 mansio}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 was acquired', a translation favoured}{
\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 elsewhere in this series, it is more likely to abbreviate }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 quando recepit }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 referring to Roger}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
(as also in 28,2). The phrase is very common in Exon and on a great many occasions is}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 written in full as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 quando recepit}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
See 1,9 value note and compare 28,2 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 47,8\tab [Exon 51a2]
\par \tab POORTON. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Roger has ... Poorton, which Alwin held in 1066; it paid tax for 1 \'bd hides. Roger has a further \'bd hide there, which Ulf held. Now Guy holds these 2 hides from Roger'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Redhove Hundred; see 13,7 Poorton note. Redhove Hundred was later part of Beaminster Hundred.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab ALWIN AND ULF HELD IT AS [***] 2 HIDES. Almost certainly 'two manors', though it is possible that the missing words should be }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 T.R.E.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 7 geldab}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 at}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
] ('... held it before 1066 and it paid tax for'). The corresponding entry in Exon shows that there were two manors in 1066, one held by Alwin, the other by Ulf, and that the total tax paid was 2 hides.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab IN LORDSHIP 1 PLOUGH. The corresponding e
ntry in Exon has 'Guy has 1 plough there'. Unusually, it is written separately from the 1 hide and 1 virgate that he has in lordship, though probably only in error (compare the misplaced woodland in this entry). This also occurs in 55,2 (see 55,2 lordship
 note).}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab PASTURE. The corresponding entry in Exon has '... 15 furlongs in both (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 inter}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 length and width'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WOODLAND, 15 ACRES. In the corresponding entry in Exon this detail is written in the middle of the list of livestock, hence, probably,}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 its omission by the main scribe of Great Domesday.}{
\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 47,9\tab [Exon 51b1]
\par \tab WORTH [MATRAVERS]. The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Ailwood (later Rowbarrow) Hundred. Later }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wurthe }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Worzthe }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
is a Fitzpaine fee in Hasler Hundred, together with Rollington (47,10); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 752; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 37, 44, 56.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ALFRITH <OF PIDDLETRENTHIDE>. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 47,3 Alfrith note.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Alfrith held it in 1066 and could not be separated from the king's service'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WOODLAND, 7 FURLONGS IN BOTH LENGTH AND WIDTH. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'woodland, 7 furlongs in length and as many in width'.}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Thus, the furlong is here being used in a linear sense and the phrase apparently being equivalent to 'woodland, 7 furlongs'. See 1,1 furlongs note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 47,3 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 47,10\tab [Exon 51b2]
\par \tab ROBERT [!1! TILLY !1!]. See 47,4 Robert note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ROLLINGTON.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  In Hasler Hundred (28); see 47,9 Worth note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab NINE THANES}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  ... FREELY. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Nine thanes held it in 1066 and could go to whichever lord they would [for 'freely' being omitted, see 55,6 freely note] ... These thane
s [In the Exon manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 illi tagni }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is interlined above }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 habent adhuc in dominio }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 to clarify further] still have in lordship these 2 \'bd
 hides, less the fourth part of 1 virgate [Ellis misprinted }{\i\f827\cf1\insrsid9113064 quarta part\'e7 }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 both here and earlier in the entry for the Exon manuscript's }{\i\f827\cf1\insrsid9113064 quart\'e2 part\'e7}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; the correct grammar, however, is }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 quarta parte}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]';}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
they also have the meadow and probably the pasture. In this manor the lordship appears to have remained unusually in the hands of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 T.R.E.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  holders, not passing to Robert with the r
est of the land. Lower layers of subtenancy are not normally mentioned either in Exon or in Domesday, though they are a feature of satellite documents such}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 as Evesham A; see WOR \{Appendix\}
. In this case the Exon scribe considered the unusual information important, but the main scribe of Great Domesday ruthlessly omitted it.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab TAX FOR 2 \'bd HIDES, LESS THE FOURTH PART OF 1 VIRGATE. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 min' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (= }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 minus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
'less') is added in the margin; the main scribe of Great Domesday obviously took the meaning to be 'it paid tax for 2 \'bd hides and the fourth part of 1 virgate'. When the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 min' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 was added the }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 7}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  after }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 dimid'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  should have been deleted.}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 However, in the Exon manuscript there is also an }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 & }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 in error before the statement 'these thanes still have in lordship these 2 \'bd hides and less (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 & ... min}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 us}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]) the}{\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 fourth part of 1 virgate', though there is not one in the tax statement earlier in the entry; the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 minus }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
is not an addition but begins a new line and could have been overlooked by the main scribe of Great Domesday. This appears to be a clear example of his copying directly from Exon as we have it now, mistakes and all. See 56,56 part note.}{\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 47,11\tab [Exon 52a1]}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab ALWARD HELD. The corresponding entry in Exon adds 'and he could go to whichever lord he would'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \'bd PLOUGH ... THERE. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Roger has \'bd plough there'; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 in dominio }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 perhaps omitted in error.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 47,12\tab [Exon 52a2]
\par \tab HERSTON. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The land appears as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Suanewik' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Swanage] in the list of Arundel fees in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 94; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 751.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab HER.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  It is possible that Herston is named after }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Her}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 standing for Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Here}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 a shortened form of names such as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Herefrith}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Heremod }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 etc., although von Feilitzen, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 289, considers this unsatisfactory; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, i. p. 55. This is the only occurrence of this name in Domesday.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab The corresponding entry in Exon adds 'and he could go to whichever lord he would'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 48\tab LAND OF SERLO OF BURCY. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Land (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Terram}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
accusative, in error) of Serlo of Burcy of (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dorset'; see DOR 47 Roger note.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab Burcy is in the d\'e9partement of Calvados, France. His lands passed to a daughter Geva, then to the children of her first husband, Martin.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 48,1\tab [Exon 53a1]}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WATERSTON. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pidere}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 . }{\insrsid9113064 It was identified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 99 no. 334, as Waterston, but identified by }{
\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{\insrsid9113064  as one or more of Tolpuddle, Athelhampton, Piddlehinton and Bardolfeston. However, }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 the land can be identified from an analys
is of the Tax Return for Puddletown Hundred. It is held as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pidela Walteri }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 93, by William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 filius Martini}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pudele Walterreston }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 15; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}
{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 379; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 35, 54, 61; Taylor, 'Lost Dorset Placenames', pp. 212-13.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 12 VILLAGERS ... The corresponding entry in Exon has 'There are on that land 12 villagers ...', rather than the usual formula '[the 1086 holder] has ...'. This also occurs with the 'villagers' in 55,13-14;31 and five times i
n the Exon for Devon (see DEV 3,86 villagers note).}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab MEADOW. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'meadows', }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 pratorum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 genitive plural, perhaps a scribal error for}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 prati}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 genitive singular, though the plural occurs similarly in the Exon for Devon (DEV 42,2
4), an entry written by a different scribe (see DEV 42,24 meadow note). Compare 5,2 pastures note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 48,2\tab [Exon 53a2]
\par \tab WHITECLIFF. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Ailwood (later Rowbarrow) Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab ALWARD HELD. The corresponding entry in Exon adds 'and he could go to which lord he wished'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Value when he acquired it', presumably referring to Serlo.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 49\tab AIULF THE CHAMBERLAIN. He was the brother of Humphrey the chamberlain; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH}{\i\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Somerset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, i. p. 416. He had succeeded Hugh son of Grip as sheriff of Dorset by 1082/1084 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 i. no. 204 p. 55; Round, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Documents}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  France}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 1206 p. 435; see 26,20 Piddlehinton note) and was sheriff of Somerset by 1091 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
i. no. 315 pp. 81-82), holding both offices in the reign of Henry I and perhaps until 1120. He was probably also at court a deputy to Robert Malet, the king's great chamberlain; see Mor
ris, 'Office of Sheriff', p. 151 note 48. Aiulf also held land in Wiltshire. Some of his Dorset lands are later held by the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Gouiz }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 family, which also holds those of Hugh son of Grip (DOR 55). For the form }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Aiulfus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see 1,8 Aiulf note.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par \tab \tab }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 No Exon survives for Aiulf's fief in Dorset, with the}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
exception of one reference which has no corresponding Domesday entry. On folio 28a3, under the heading of the king's lordship land in Dorset, between entries referring to Domesday 24,2 and 18,1 is found the following:}{\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 'Aiulf the sheriff has 1 virgate of land in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wintreborna }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 of reeveland. It pays 5s a year'.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab That entry was probably included under the king's lordship land in Exon because it was reeveland (land that the sheriff. that is, the 'shire-reeve', has exclusively for 
his own use, all customs, services and payments belonging to him) which is often recorded under the king's land (see HEF 1,2). This 'Winterborne' is probably the same as the 'Winterborne' in the group of manors held by the king in 1,6 which is detailed in
 Exon at 28a1; see 1,6 'Winterborne' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 49,1\tab BLANDFORD [ST MARY].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Combsditch Hundred; see 26,29 Blandford note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 49,3\tab HAMPRESTON. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hame}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 This land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Canedone'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 27, John }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Gouyz }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and Alice }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Lucy }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 hold in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hamme }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Cranborne Hundred (the successor to 'Canedone' Hundred) from the Earl of Gloucester; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 39, 46.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 6 HIDES. In the manuscript the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .vi. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 appears to be a correction, possibly from }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .iii.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
with an odd mark over the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 v}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The parchment is scraped here.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 49,4\tab "}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 SELAVESTUNE".}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The place can be located in Badbury Hundred by an analysis of the Tax Returns, but has not been precisely identified; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 189.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 49,5\tab `TARRANT'. Domesday }{\i\insrsid9113064 Terente}{\insrsid9113064 . It was tentatively identified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 100 no. 340, as Tarrant Gunville and by }{\i\insrsid9113064 
Domesday Gazetteer}{\insrsid9113064  as plain 'Tarrant'. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The association of this place with Stubhampton, Chettle and Farnham (the last in 'Langeburgh'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Hundred, according to an analysis of the Tax Returns) suggests a place on the upper reaches of the river, in 'Langeburgh'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred, possibly Tarrant Gunville; see Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. pp. 451, 459; and \{Introduction: Places Named from Rivers\}.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 49,7\tab "AIRARD".}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  It is unclear what name is represented by the Domesday form }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Airard}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 us}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
], which only occurs here in Domesday; see Forssner, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Continental-Germanic}{\i\insrsid9113064  Personal Names in England}{\insrsid9113064 
, p. 17. It has therefore been decided to keep to the Domesday form for the present revision. The Alecto edition has Airard. The Phillimore printed edition has Aethelhard, reasoning that }{\i\insrsid9113064 Airard}{\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\insrsid9113064 us}
{\insrsid9113064 ] represented Old English }{\i\insrsid9113064 \'c6thelheard }{\insrsid9113064 (von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid9113064 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\insrsid9113064 , p. 184), by }{\i\insrsid9113064 l/r}{\insrsid9113064 
 interchange with the form }{\i\insrsid9113064 Ailard}{\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\insrsid9113064 us}{\insrsid9113064 ] found in DEV 34,53. However, the }{\i\insrsid9113064 Ailardus}{\insrsid9113064  in Devon was a }{\i\insrsid9113064 T.R.E.}{\insrsid9113064 
 holder, whereas }{\i\insrsid9113064 Airard}{\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\insrsid9113064 us}{\insrsid9113064 ] here is a 1086 subtenant of Aiulf. Nonetheless, he might still be an Englishman, and connected in some way with the thane who held in 1066.}{
\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 49,8\tab FARNHAM.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  In 'Langeburgh'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred (as 49,17) in 1086 (see 49,5 'Tarrant' note), later in Cranborne Hundred where Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Lucy }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 and John }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Gouiz }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 hold from the Earl of Gloucester in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 26.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab IT PAID TAX FOR 2 HIDES, WHICH ARE THERE. It looks as though the main scribe of Great Domesday omitted the phrase }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Terra est}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ... }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 car' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
which normally precedes the phrase }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 qui ibi sunt }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 cum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
(see 49,6. 50,3 etc.). It is not possible to tell how many ploughs were there.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 49,9\tab BRADLE. A fee of Alfred of Lincoln in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 750; held in Hasler Hundred from the heirs of William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Gouiz }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and Roger }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Haselden }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 37; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 44, 56.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 49,10\tab TATTON. The entries here and at 55,23 can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Uggescombe' Hundred. Tatton was later in Cullifordtree Hundred, as the result of a change in the boundary between
 'Uggescombe' Hundred and Cullifordtree Hundred. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 7, Brian }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Govis }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and Andrew }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Tattun }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
hold in 'Uggescombe' Hundred from the Earl of Gloucester.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab CERNE CHURCH.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  It had also lost 2 hides in Tatton to Hugh son of Grip (55,23). Compar
e 49,17 and 55,21, other alienations of church land (this time from Shaftesbury Abbey) by Aiulf and by Hugh's wife. However, there is no reference under the holding of Cerne Abbey (DOR 11) to these alienations, as there is under Shaftesbury Abbey (19,11) 
for its alienated lands.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 49,11\tab DURWESTON. In 'Hundesburge'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred in 1086, according to an analysis of the Tax Returns. Bryan }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Gouiz }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
holds in Pimperne Hundred (which absorbed 'Hundesburge' Hundred) from the honour of Gloucester in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 27, 43, 46; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 750.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VINEYARD. Aiulf also had a vineyard on one of his estates in Wiltshire (WIL 55,1), as well as in the next entry here (49,12).}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 49,12\tab WOOTTON [FITZPAINE]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 It can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Whitchurch Hundred. See 26,63 Wootton note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 4 CARUCATES ARE IN LORDSHIP. Domesday }{\i\f820\cf1\insrsid9113064 carucat\'ea }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is perhaps an error for }{\i\f820\cf1\insrsid9113064 hid\'ea}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 which is usual in this phrase (for example, 1,7): carucates were used of land not hidated (see 2,6 carucates note) and this holding paid tax for 12 hides.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VINEYARD. See 49,11 vineyard note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab "ARPENTS".}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 An }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 arpent }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 was a French measure of uncertain and probably variable size, usually applied in Domesday to vineyards, but oc
casionally to meadow and woodland (see WIL 12,4 "arpent" note). The vineyard in 49,11 is measured in acres, unusually; on this vineyard, see 49,11 vineyard note .}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 49,13\tab BRIDGE. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Brige }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 here, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Briga }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in 55,18, the most likely identification being w
ith Bridge farm in Wyke Regis; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 268.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab LAND FOR 2 OXEN. .The number of oxen appear quite frequently in place of '}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 y}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 ploughs' in this phrase in Dorset (for example, 55,12;18. 56,25;41 etc.). There were normally reckoned to be 8 oxen to a plough-team, but there is evidence for smaller teams in the south-west; see Lennard, \lquote Domesday Plough-Teams\rquote 
; and Lennard, }{\insrsid9113064 'Domesday }{\i\insrsid9113064 Caruca}{\insrsid9113064 '; }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Finberg, \lquote Domesday Plough-Team\rquote . In Herefordshire there is evidence that, at least on the king's lor
dship land, a plough-team of 6 oxen was the norm; see HEF 1,50 oxen note. See also DEV 3,37 oxen note, where '6 oxen in a plough' are recorded and examples given of '3 oxen' in Exon corresponding to Domesday's '\'bd
 plough'. In the latter case, however, the main scribe of Great Domesday may merely have rounded up Exon's odd oxen to a \'bd plough: on a number of occasions he seems to have discounted odd oxen, as the 2 oxen in 55,40 (see also DEV 3,44 oxen note).}{
\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 2 FISHERMEN; THEY PAY 5s. Or perhaps, reading }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 redd' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 as abbreviating }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 reddit}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , singular,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
rather than }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 reddunt}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 '2 fishermen. It (the virgate) pays 5s'. See 2,5 pay note, 47,7 hides note and 57,2 smallholders note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 49,14\tab HETHFELTON. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
This entry can be located by an analysis of the Tax Return for Bere Hundred. Since Worgret was similarly in Bere Hundred in 1086, it seems probable that the southern boundary of the hundred was the River Frome. Hethfelton is later in Winfrith Hundred; Wor
gret was later in Hasler Hundred; see 11,9 Worgret note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS 5s; NOW 40s. A large increase; see 56,12 value note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 49,15\tab LULWORTH. It can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Winfrith Hundred.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab ALFRED THE SHERIFF. Sheriff of Dorset before 1066; see Harmer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Anglo-Saxon Writs}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no. 1 pp. 120-21 and p. 557.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 49,16\tab [LONG] CRICHEL. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Lang Kyrchil }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 28 (in 1303), in Knowlton Hundred by John }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Gouyz}
{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 the same man holds Farnham (49,8) and Hampreston (49,3); see 1,3 Crichel note and 34,11 Crichel note; and Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, iii. p. 482.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab AIULF HOLDS ... FOR AS LONG ... SHERIFF. Compare HRT 1,13 where the sheriff Ilbert gave land to a man-at-arms of his while (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 dum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
that is, 'for as long as') he was sheriff.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 49,17\tab FARNHAM. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 49,8 Farnham note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab SHAFTESBURY CHURCH. See 19,11 and 19,11 Farnham note. See 55,21 for another part of Farnham, similarly held before 1066 by Shaftesbury Abbey. See also 49,10 Cerne note. Aiulf restored this \'bd
 hide to Shaftesbury when his daughter became a nun there; see the confirmation charter dated 1121-1122 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
ii. pp. 346-347 no. clv (calendar no. 1347).}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 50\tab HUMPHREY THE CHAMBERLAIN. Brother of Aiulf the sheriff (see DOR
 49 Aiulf note). He was probably of the household of Queen Matilda: he held land in Surrey (SUR 31) from her holding and she gave him two manors in Gloucestershire (GLS 69,6-7) and she herself held the rest of Edmondsham (1,18). His estates became part of
 the honour of Gloucester; some of his heirs and tenants from the Gloucester honour are a branch of the de Gurnay family.
\par \tab \tab No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this chapter.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 50,1\tab EDMONDSHAM. See 1,18 Edmondsham note. The land (50,1-2) seems to have lain in 'Alvredesberge' Hundred in 1086, according to an analysis of the Tax Returns, and was later in Cranborne Hundred where }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Berthin}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 us}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ] }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Payn }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (who also held Stourpaine, 50,4) held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Emodesham }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from John }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Badeham }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 27; see also }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 39,40.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab DODA [* THE MONK *]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 1,18 Doda note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 50,2\tab EDMONDSHAM. See 50,1 Edmondsham note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab EDEVA. Perhaps the widow who in the Tax Return for 'Alvredesberge' Hundred holds 1 hide at a revenue from Humphrey the chamberlain and 
from which the king has had no tax 'because Aiulf states that the queen had remitted it for the soul of her son Richard'. The name represents Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Eadgifu}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 50,3\tab HEMSWORTH. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Probably in Badbury Hundred in 1086, according to an analysis of the Tax Returns.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 50,4\tab STOURPAINE. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Sture}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
The place can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Pimperne Hundred which states that of the 5 hides Humphrey the chamberlain holds in lordship he gave \'bd hide to the church with the king's consent. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 753, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Stures Paen }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is held from Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Gurnay }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 28, has one of the same holders (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Berthin}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 us}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ] Payn) as Edmondsham (50,1-2); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 87; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 43, 46, 47; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , vii. (Edward III) no. 416; Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 304. See also 57,19 Stourpaine note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 51\tab THIS CHAPTER was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday after the end of DOR 54. He squeezed it in at the bottom of folio 83b, 
extending a couple of letters into the central margin, the last line being below the bottom marginal ruling which was done so firmly that it cut the parchment. He used rubricated transposition signs to indicate its position in the text after DOR 50.}{
\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab HUGH OF PORT. From Port-en-Bassin near Bayeux in the d\'e9partement of Calvados, France; see Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 108. He may have been sheriff of Nottinghamshire, and Derbyshire 1086 x 1096, and also sheriff of Hampshire 1070 x 1087 where most of his lands lay; see Green, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 English Sheriffs}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 44, 67.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab No corresponding entry in Exon survives for this chapter.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 51,1\tab COMPTON [VALENCE]. The 10 hides appear in the Tax Returns for both Tollerford Hundred and Frampton Hundred: in each there is a re
cord of 6 hides and 1 virgate of lordship land held by Hugh of Port, and in both the 3 hides and 3 virgates representing the taxable remainder of the 10 hides are recorded as being in Frampton Hundred ('in another hundred' in the Return for Tollerford Hun
dred) but paying tax in Tollerford Hundred ('in another hundred' in the Return for Frampton Hundred).}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 However, the 10 hides fit neatly into the reconstruction of the Tax Return for Frampton Hundred, but are superfluous to the hidage of the Tax Return for To
llerford Hundred. It seems likely that the land was in fact being moved from one hundred to another. Hugh of Port may have been holding it illegally and been trying to remove it from the Abbot of Caen's franchise. Nonetheless, Compton Valence was always i
n Frampton Hundred (or Liberty) in later times; in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 94, William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Pont del Arch }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cumton' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (also 
}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Compton Pundelarche}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; see}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 230) from Adam }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Port}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , perhaps a descendant of Hugh of Port.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab BONDI [* THE C
ONSTABLE *]. Bondi is named as the constable on the fiefs of William son of Ansculf (BUK 17,9), the Count of Mortain (BUK 12,29), and Henry of Ferrers (BUK 27,1), though named Boding the constable in Henry's case. This was certainly Bondi, however, since 
Henry succeeded him in four other counties and laid claim in a fifth as Bondi's successor (GLS 31,2). Apart from other the links through the Count of Mortain and William son of Ansculf, it is probable that the Bondi who held manors valued at over \'a3
10 was, i
n most, of not all cases, the constable; and his status as a lord of men identifies him at Colemore in Hampshire (HAM 57,2), and therefore probably on the adjacent holding at Empshott (HAM 62,1). Finally, the Bondi who preceded Countess Judith in several 
o
f her holdings in Northamptonshire may also have been the constable. There can be little doubt that the Countess had only one predecessor named Bondi, five of his seven holdings being centred on Earls Barton, held with full jurisdiction, the whole complex
 worth \'a3
16. Its status certainly befitted someone of the constable's status, and Earls Barton was just a couple of miles from his manor at Ecton, acquired by Henry of Ferrers. Some further, if slight support, for this identification is supplied by Orderic V
italis, }{\i\insrsid9113064 Ecclesiastical History}{\insrsid9113064 
, according to whom Earl Waltheof granted the manor of Barnack to Crowland Abbey, a gift later defeated by 'the malice of the Normans' (Chibnall, ii. pp. 344-45). Barnack was held in Domesday Book by William son of Ansculf, as
 noted above the constable's predecessor elsewhere. He may, therefore, have stepped into Waltheof's shoes in those cases, too, Waltheof being the first to succeed to those estates of the constable. See also Clarke, }{\i\insrsid9113064 English Nobility}{
\insrsid9113064 , pp. 266-67, whose list omits ESS 29,5. HAM 57,2. 62,1. IoW9,15. NTH 36,2. 56,15-18;37-38;53 (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab IN LORDSHIP 3 PLOUGHS. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .iii. car'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
the first minim stroke is slightly smaller, possibly the reason why Farley missed it. The cut in the parchment comes here (see DOR 51 chapter note).}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 52\tab HUGH OF SAINT-QUENTIN.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Probably Saint-Quentin in the d\'e9partement of Manche, France: Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 113. He also held in chief in Essex (ESS 60) and land in Hampshire.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this chapter.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 52,1\tab STINSFORD.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 425, Philip }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Quentin }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 holds in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Stinteford}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The holding can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Dorchester Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 52,2\tab THE SECOND LINE of this entry is written below the bottom margin ruling of folio 83a. Both 52,1 and the first two lines of 52,2 are compressed.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab RINGSTEAD.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  This holding can be located b
y an analysis of the Tax Return for Chilbury Hundred which was later absorbed by Winfrith Hundred. Ringstead is now in Osmington parish, and so in Cullifordtree Hundred although it was long a tithing in Winfrith Hundred and was a separate parish until the
 
fifteenth century. There were four holdings there in Domesday (see also 55,34;36 and 56,39) and several villages in the Middle Ages. 'West Ringstead' is still on the Ordnance Survey maps, represented by the remains of a church and the earthworks of a dese
rted village. 'Up Ringstead' (perhaps a part of 'West Ringstead'; see 55,34 Ringstead note) is probably represented by Upton (SY7483); East Ringstead survived as a field name on the 1839 Tithe map, while 'Middle Ringstead' is lost; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 212; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Royal Commission on Historical Monuments }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
), ii. part i. pp. 179-83. The present holding is perhaps 'Up Ringstead', the \'bd mill at 4s answering that at Watercombe (1,29). The natural site for the mill would be on the small brook that runs
 east-west between Upton and Watercombe then reaches the sea at Osmington.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab FOUR THANES.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  The }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Q'ttuo}{\i\cf1\up6\insrsid9113064 r}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Quattuor}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 is written over an erasure in the manuscript, hence the unusual abbreviation and cramping.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 53\tab [LAND OF HUGH OF BOSCHERBERT]. The main scribe of Great Domesday omitted the chapter heading through lack of space. Hugh is }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de boscherberti }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
in the Landholders' List on folio 75a and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de boschherberti }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in 53,1. In Exon he occurs as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de bosco herberti }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 for 36,3 and as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
de nemore herberti }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 for 55,46 and in the Tax Returns for 'Uggescombe' Hundred and Dorchester Hundred. The French place-name cannot be identified; see Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 74.

\par \tab \tab No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this chapter.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 53,1\tab `CERNE'.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  O
ne the places (Forston, Herrison or Pulston) on the lower reaches of the River Cerne in Dorchester (later St George) Hundred. It can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Dorchester Hundred and is stated, without supporting evidence, to be 
Wolfeton in Charminster parish (see 1,4 Fordington note) by Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dorset Survey}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 123-24.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 53,2\tab THE UNNAMED LAND lay in 'Uggescombe' Hundred according to an analysis of the Tax Returns, where Hugh of Boscherbert is stated as holding 5 hides in lor
dship (the hidage of 53,1 'Cerne', Hugh's only other holding, being too small to account for it). This major holding has not been identified, but might possibly be Litton Cheney (SY5590), lying in this hundred, an important land in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 93, 425, and in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 6, 34, 53, stated to have been in the king's hands since the time of William I. It included }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Gorewull }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Gorewell farm in Long Bredy, SY5787] and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Ekerdun }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Eggardon, the hundred moot, SY5393]. Further evidence is needed to clinch
 this identification. See 1,2 entry note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 54\tab [LAND OF HUGH OF IVRY AND OTHER FRENCHMEN]. The chapter heading is}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 supplied from the Landholders' List on folio 75a (it is number }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 LIII}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 there; see DOR 45 Alfred note); the main scribe of Great Domesday omitted it here through lack of space.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this chapter.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 54,1\tab HUGH OF IVRY. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 In the manuscript here }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hugo de lVRI }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (or perhaps }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 IVRI}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
but not }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 LVRI }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 as Farley), but }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hugo de Luri }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in the Landholders' List on folio 75a. The form }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Luri}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  luri}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 which also occurs in NTH 24,1 and in NTH 23,16 with Roger of Ivry, is probably due to scribal confusion of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 I }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 L}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , as the byname occurs regularly in Domesday as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Iuri }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Ivri }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and represents Ivry-la-Bataille in the d\'e9
partement of Eure, France; see Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 93. Hugh of Ivry was butler (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 pincerna}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
in the Norman household before 1066 (see Round, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Documents}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  France}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , nos. 1167, 73) and was still called }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 pincerna }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 in 1082 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 i. no. 150 pp. 41-42). He was a tenant-in-chief in Northamptonshire,}{\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 Oxfordshire, and probably Bedfordshire; see Round, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 King's Serjeants}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 141. He was probably the brother (or perhaps the nephew) of Roger of Ivry who was also styled }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 pincerna }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and was a tenant-in-chief in several Domesday counties; see GLS W1 Roger note and GLS 41 Roger note. See also Round, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 King's Serjeants}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, pp. 140-41; White, 'Household of the Norman Kings', p. 141.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab PLACES. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 locis}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Farley misprinted }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Locis}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 54,2\tab [STOURTON] CAUNDLE. T}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 he land can be identified from an analysis of the Brunsell Hundred Tax Return; see 26,70 Caundle note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab [VALUE ***]. Probably omitted in error, as also in 54,14 and 57,16; see also 56,61 and 56,61 [***] note. Compare 55,45 which has
 a value and for which Exon states that the 1086 holder has a plough and 'nothing more'. On other possible reasons for omitted value statements, see 2,5 pay note, 12,13 salt-workers note, 49,13 fishermen note and 57,2 smallholders note.}{\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\insrsid9113064 54,3\tab `WEY'.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Cullifordtree Hundred; see \{Introduction: Places Named from Rivers\}.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 54,4\tab MOORBATH. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in Whitchurch Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 54,5\tab RICHARD OF REVIERS. He came f}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 rom Reviers in the d\'e9partement of Calvados, France; see Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 109.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab MOSTERTON. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The land can be located from an analysis of the Tax Return for Beaminster Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 54,6\tab SHILLINGSTONE. It was}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  earlier Shilling Okeford (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Acforde Eskelin}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ),}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 named from the 1086 holder Ascelin (}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Schelin}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ); see}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. pp. 238-39. The land seems to have been parcelled out of Child Okeford (1,7), both being held by Earl Harold before 1066. Shillingstone is later a detached part of Cranborne Hundred, held of the honour of Gloucester; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 750; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 26, 39, 45.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 54,7\tab POORTON. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 13,7 Poorton note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 54,8\tab ANSKETIL SON OF AMELINA. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 He appears to be the same as Ansketil of Cherbourg: in the Tax Return for Hasler Hundred Ansketil }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Carisburgo}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  holds 2 hides and 1 
\'bd virgates of lordship land. His byname, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Carisburgo}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , is}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Caesaris burgum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 not (as stated by Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 39) Charborough (in Dorset) which is }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cereberie }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in 1,9; nor Carisbrook (as }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 123); compare Osbern of Cherbourg (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Keresburg }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in GLS 71,1);}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab BRICTRIC [* SON OF ALGAR *]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Probably Brictric son of Algar; see 1,17 Brictric note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab HE DID NOT PETITION THE KING [FOR IT]. The Latin is }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 rege}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 m}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  non requ}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 i}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 siuit}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
At Queen Matilda's death in 1083 the land would have fallen to the king and it would have been natural for Ansketil to have requested renewal of his subtenancy, but he did not do so, and seems therefore to have been holding the land illegally in 1086.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 54,9\tab RALPH [* OF CRANBORNE *]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Probably Ralph of Cranborne who is recorded as holding 1 hide and 1 virgate in lordship in the Tax Return for 'Langeburgh' Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab `TARRANT'. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 This land was in 'Langeburgh' Hundred. It is possible that this Ralph, or the man of 55,29, named Tarrant Rawston; see F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 61; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 127; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dorset Survey}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 pp. 131-32.}{\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab BRICTRIC [* SON OF ALGAR *]. See 1,17 Brictric note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 54,10\tab [WEST] PARLEY. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in 'Canedone'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred. East Parley is in the adjacent Hurn parish just o
ver the Hampshire border. West Parley is held from the Earl of Gloucester in Cranborne Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 27, 46, 59.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 54,11\tab FARNHAM. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Langeburgh'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred in 1086.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 54,12\tab MILBORNE [STILEHAM].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Bere Hundred; see 46,1 Milborne note. The subtenant Doda may have named Dodding's farm in Bere Regis; see 55,15 Bere note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab DODA [* THE MONK *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 54,13\tab THE SON OF EVERBOLD. Most probably Odo (54,11) rather than a different son.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 54,14\tab PETERSHAM.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Held as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pitrichesham }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in two portions from the honour of Gloucester in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 750; in Cranborne Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 26, 39, 46. See DOR 55a Isolde note. It lay in 'Canedone'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Hundred in 1086, according to an analysis of the Tax Returns.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab [VALUE ***]. Omitted in error; see 54,2 value note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 55\tab LAND OF THE WIFE OF HUGH SON OF GRIP. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hugonis filii G}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 rip}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
is written over an erasure. She was called Hawise; see 23,1 Hugh note. See B1 Hugh note on her husband as the sheriff of Dorset before Aiulf. She appears to have remarried, this time to Alfred of Lincoln; see Bond, 'Barony of the Wife 
of Hugh Fitz Grip', pp. 116-118. Certainly her lands were later in the possession of Alfred of Lincoln and his heirs. A frequent holder in the feodaries is William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Gouiz}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 Alfred of Lincoln's son Robert founded the priory of East Holme, a cell of Montacute, and endowed it with lands, tithes and churches from his holdings; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, iii. p. 80. The list in the Montacute Cartulary (Maxwell Lyte and others, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bruton and Montacute Cartularies}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 160-61 nos. 118-19), contains 3 virgates in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wrde }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
[Worth Matravers, 55,43], the land of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Plys }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Plush; see 8,3 Buckland note], salt from the salt-pans at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Langeton }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Purbike }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Langton Matravers; see 37,13 wife note], the tithes }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 of Acforde }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Okeford Fitzpaine, 8,2], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Winterburne Gurewambe}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
[see 55,1 Martinstown note], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Langeton }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 near }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Abotesbire }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Langton Herring, 55,31], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Corfton }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
[Corton in Portesham; see 13,4 virgate note], a garden near }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bradle }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [probably Orchard (55,47 Orchard note) near Bradle, 49,9], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cheselburneforde }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
['Little Cheselbourne', 55,3], }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Watercumbe }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [part of Ringstead (?); see 55,36], and the church of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wermewelle }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Warmwell, 55,35]. In the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Inquisition post mortem }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 of Alfred of Lincoln (1264: }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. (Henry III) no. 580) and that of William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Gouyz }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. (Edward I) no. 541) many of the lands held by the wife of Hugh, both in chief and as subtenant, reappear.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,1\tab [Exon 54a1]
\par \tab MARTINSTOWN. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wintreburne}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
the fuller modern form, Winterborne St Martin, survives as the parish name. This entry can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Dorchester (later St George) Hundred and the land later became }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 caput }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 of the barony of Robert Fitzpaine; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 17, 31, 50; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. (Henry III) no. 580.}{
\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab Of the eight holdings named 'Winterborne' in the lands of the wife of Hugh, two (Winterborne Houghton (55,17; see 55,17 Winterborne note) and the present entry) ca
n be positively identified. Of the remainder, 55,9 can be located by an analysis of the Tax Return for Cullifordtree Hundred and 55,11-12 by one for the Tax Return of Combsditch Hundred, while 55,27-28 are to be located by an analysis of the Tax Return fo
r 'Hundesburge'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Hundred. This locates these places called 'Winterborne' in particular hundreds, but does not individually identify them. The only other 'Winterborne' (55,7), while it cannot be located by an analysis of any Tax Return, lies in a group of pla
ces in Cullifordtree Hundred that begins with Buckland Ripers (55,4) and ends with another 'Winterborne' (55,9).
\par \tab \tab Later evidence sometimes identifies more precisely the land of the wife of Hugh. Thus in Cullifordtree Hundred lay }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Winterborne Esse}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 now Asht
on in Winterborne St Martin which is itself in St George Hundred (the successor to Dorchester Hundred), but which was formerly in Cullifordtree Hundred; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 375; Hutchins, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 573. It is held from Alfred of Lincoln in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 750 and from William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Gouiz }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }
{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 19; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. (Edward I) no. 541. This probably represents the land of 55,9.
\par \tab \tab In Combsditch Hundred, Winterborne }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Rocheford }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [now Winterborne Whitechurch] was held from the barony of Alfred of Lincoln in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 751. In }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 29, 44, 48, the same land appears as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wynterburn Blaumuster }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 held by Ralph }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Rocheford }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. (Edward I) no. 541, it is }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wynterburn Whitchurch}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Furthermore, in the grant by Robert of Lincoln to Montacute Priory (see DOR 55 wife note) there appears a }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Winterburne Gurewambe}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
This form is not noted in the Place-Names of Dorset volume, but might be the same as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Winterburn' Guah}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 e}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 bon}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 noted but without decisive evidence of identity, under Whatcombe in Winterborne Whitechurch (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 84; see 55,34 Ringstead note). These lands will probably correspond to one of 55,11-12.
\par \tab \tab Adjacent to Winterborne Whitechurch but in Bere Hundred, William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Gouyz }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 held half of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Kyngeswynterborn }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Winterborne Kingston] in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 12. This holding may well have been in Combsditch Hundred in 1086 and account for one of 55,11-12.
\par \tab \tab Also held from the barony of Alfred of Lincoln was Winterborne }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Quarel }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 751), now Quarleston farm in Winterborne Stickland; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 28, 43, 47; this will probably have lain in 'Hundesburge'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred in 1086 and will correspond to the entries at 55,27-28.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab NINE THANES HELD. The corresponding entry in Exon adds 'from King Edward'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Value when Hugh acquired it'; Hugh son of Grip is meant. Likewise for the past values in 55,2-6;9;12;16;18-2
2;24-28;31;33;35-36;38;40-42;45. For 55,8;17; 34 it has 'value when Hugh son of Grip acquired it'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,2\tab [Exon 54a2]
\par \tab FROME [WHITFIELD].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  The land is held as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Frome Vitefell }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 of the barony of Winterborne St Martin (see 55,1 Martinstown note) in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 17; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 31, 50; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 144. It is a fee of the barony of Alfred of Lincoln in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 751, and in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. (Henry III) no. 580 of 1264; see DOR 55 wife note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab IN LORDSHIP 2 PLOUGHS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'William has 2 ploughs there', written after the statement of the 4 hides in lordship; no doubt the ploughs were also in lordship; see 47,8 lordship note. }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 In dominio }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is similarly omitted for 55,3.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 55,1 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,3\tab [Exon 54a3]
\par \tab ROGER [!1! BUSHELL !1!].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Exon }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 boisellus }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 here and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 bissell}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 us}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 for 11,6 (other spellings being }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 buissel}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  boiscellus }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 etc: Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, pp. 373-74). See 11,6 wife note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab `[LITTLE] CHESELBOURNE'. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 In Puddletown Hundred and alternatively called }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cheselbornford }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ['Cheselbourne Ford'], held by William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Gouiz }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 16, 35, 54. For the location of the place, see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, i. p. 316; Taylor, 'Lost Dorset Placenames', p. 211; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Royal Commission on Historical Monuments }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ), iii. p. 230. The heirs of William }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Gouiz }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 also seem to have had some interest in Dewlish, which is adjacent: }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 38, 57. On the possession by Abbotsbury Abbey, see Hutchins, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iv. p. 348.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 55,1 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,4\tab [Exon 54b1]
\par \tab BUCKLAND [RIPERS].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  The holding can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Cullifordtree Hundred. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 750, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Boclande }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 is a fee of Alfred of Lincoln and is held by John }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Ripirs }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (of Rivers) from Robert Fitzpaine (the latter holds 55,1-2) in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. pp. 19, 38, 57.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab LAND FOR 3 PLOUGHS. So in the Exon manuscript; Ellis misprinted }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 iiii}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 55,1 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,5\tab [Exon 54b2]
\par \tab `WEY'. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Brodewaye }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Broadwey] and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Waye Pigace }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Upwey; see F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 159; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 245], are held from the barony of Alfred of Lincoln in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 750. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 19, 38, and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , v. (Edward II) no. 457, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Brodeweye }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Broadwey] is held from William }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Gouiz}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Rowaldeswey }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ['Rowaldsway', lost in Broadwey] is held by William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Gouiz }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in}{\insrsid9113064  }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. (Edward I) no. 541. Another settlement may have been 'Wayhoughton', a lost place in Broadwey, the name being derived from a Hugh, possibly Hugh son of Grip:}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 201; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 129.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 3 MILLS WHICH PAY 35s. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Hugh's wife has ... 1 mill which pays 10s a year ... 2 mills which pay 25s a year are attached to this manor'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 9 PIGS. So in the Exon manuscript; Ellis misprinted }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 viii}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 55,1 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,6\tab [Exon 55a1]
\par \tab `WEY'. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 55,5 'Wey' note}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab THANES. In the manuscript there is an ink blot over the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 t }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 taini}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
but the meaning is clear.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab FREELY. In the corresponding entry in Exon 'freely' is omitted, probably because implied in the phrase 'they c
ould go to whichever lord they would with their lands' which succeeds the statement of the tenure by the five thanes (see 55,48 thanes note). The word 'freely' is also omitted for the same reasons for 47,10 and 55,32;34.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 55,1 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,7\tab [Exon 55a2]
\par \tab `WINTERBORNE'.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Among places in Cullifordtree Hundred in the order of the text; see 55,1 Martinstown note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab IT PAID TAX FOR 1 HIDE. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Hugh's wife has 1 hide of land in 'Winterborne' '; the tax is 
not mentioned separately. Similar omissions (by a different scribe) occur in the Exon for Devon; see DEV 34,11 Holcombe note and DEV 36,9 Hollowcombe note and compare DEV 34,32 before note. However, see 55,15 hide note for an example of both the hidage an
d tax payment of a manor being given.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,8\tab [Exon 55b1]
\par \tab STAFFORD.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Hugh's wife has a manor called Stafford, which two thanes held jointly in 1066; they could go with their lands to whichever lord they would. It pa
id tax for 4 hides before 1066. 2 ploughs can plough them (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 sunt arare }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in error for }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 possunt arare}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ).}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
In the same manor Hugh's wife has 2 hides of land, which Leofing held as one manor in 1066; he could go to whichever lord he would. 1 plough can plough these 2 hides. Hugh and William hold (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 tenet }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 for }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 tenent}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 the said two manors from the wife of Hugh son of Grip ...'. See \{Appendix: Details Table\}.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab The land was at West Stafford in Cullifordtree Hundred, held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 20, 38, by William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Gouiz }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
and Robert Fitzpaine, the split tenure reflecting the 1086 division. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 750, it is held from the barony of Alfred of Lincoln as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Stafford Turberevil'}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 26,7 Stafford note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab MEADOW ... PASTURE. There is an erasure of about nine letters in the manuscript after }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 p'ti }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 with a line drawn to link up}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  p'ti }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 7 xvi. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 to show that the scribe did not intend to add anything there. Farley did not print the link-line here (nor in 57,1), tho
ugh he did occasionally, for example, in HEF 29,16 (see HEF 29,16 hides note) and WOR 15,11.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab PASTURE, 16 FURLONGS AND 8 ACRES. It is possible that }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 siluae }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 'woodland' has been omitted after }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ac' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 4, and p. 104 note 45), although there is a full-stop after }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ac' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
in the manuscript. The corresponding entry in Exon, which gives details of Hugh's and William's holdings separately (see \{Appendix: Details Table\}), has '8 furlongs of pasture and 4 acres' for each tenant, and again }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 nemoris }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('woo
dland') may have been omitted, though there is no sign of this in the Exon manuscript and it would be out of the normal sequence; see 36,3 meadow note). There are several examples of furlongs and acres being mixed in a measurement; see 5,1 woodland note w
ith special reference to 19,4. It may be that there were 16 furlongs of pasture in one place and 8 acres in another (compare 36,2. 55,29 and 1,8 woodland note).}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Value of these two manors when Hugh son of Grip acquired them'; 'of Grip' is }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Grippi }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 with }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ni }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 inter\-lined (= }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Grippini}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 genitive), not }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 iii }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 interlined as Ellis printed. See 55,1 value note.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,9\tab [Exon 55b2]
\par \tab `WINTERBORNE'. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 One of the places called Winterborne on the River South Winterborne in Culliford\-tree Hundred; see 55,1 Martinstown note and \{Introduction: Hundreds\}.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 55,1 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,10\tab [Exon 56a1]
\par \tab WILLIAM [!1! [OF?] "CHERNET" !1!].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  The forms of this byname which appear in Exon are }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 chernet}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  de creneto }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
chernaet }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 for the present entry, 55,13 and 55,14 respectively. It might be a Breton place-name surname from one of the group: Kernay, Kern\'e9, Kerneac(h), Kernec'h, Kernerc'h, indexed in Falchun and Tanguy, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Les Noms de Lieux Celtiques}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 202. More precise identification is impossible at present.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab MORDEN. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The land was later called Morden }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Roberti}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 a fee of Alfred of Lincoln: }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 751; see 26,24 Morden note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab LAND FOR 
1 PLOUGH. A gap suitable for about 22 letters follows this statement, possibly left for such details as given in the corresponding entry in Exon, although the main scribe of Great Domesday did not always give the amount of land in lordship and never the v
i
llagers' land holding in Dorset. It is more likely that the space was left for the ploughs in lordship and the number of villagers and their ploughs and the resources, information similarly omitted by Exon; see 1,1 life note and 1,2 woodland note on gaps 
left by the main scribe of Great Domesday.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab THE VILLAGERS. In the corresponding entry in Exon the number is not given, however.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Value when he acquired it'. The }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ille }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
probably refers to Hugh, but it could refer to William [of?] "Chernet": see 55,29 value note and 55,30 value note and also DEV 16,88 formerly note. Likewise for the past values in 55,13-14.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 55,11\tab [Exon 56a2]
\par \tab `WINTERBORNE'. This 'Winterborne' and the one in 55,12 is one of the places called Winterborne on the eastern River Winterborne in Combsditch Hundred; see 55,1 Martinstown note and \{Introduction: Hundreds\}.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 5 HIDES ... 3 HIDES ... 1 \'bd HIDES. It is likely the 3 hides of lordship land in the corresponding entry in Exon is a mistake for '3 \'bd
 hides', which is the figure given for the lordship land of Hugh's wife' in the Tax Return for Combsditch Hundred, and which would then add up with the villagers' land to the 5 hides. See 1,19 tax note on other di
screpancies between the details and tax total.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Value when H[ugh]'s wife acquired it'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,12\tab [Exon 56a3]
\par \tab `WINTERBORNE'. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 26,13 'Winterborne' note and 55,11 'Winterborne' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 55,1 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,13\tab [Exon 56a4]
\par \tab WILLIAM [!1! OF "CHERNET" !1!]. Se}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 e 55,10 William note}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab WIMBORNE [ST GILES].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  The ident
ification is not certain, but the order of the text suggests a place in 'Alvredesberge' Hundred rather than in Badbury Hundred (which would imply Wimborne Minster). The part mill may be associated with that of 57,9.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab THE THIRD PART OF A MILL WHICH PAYS 15d. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'He has there the third part (}{\i\f827\cf1\insrsid9113064 treci\'e2 past\'e7}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
a scribal error for }{\i\f827\cf1\insrsid9113064 terti\'e2 part\'e7}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ) of 1 mill, that is 15d';. In Domesday the Latin is ambiguous: the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 redd' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
could refer either to the third part or to the whole mill, but Exon makes the situation clear. Compare 56,12 mill note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 55,10 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,14\tab [Exon 56b1]
\par \tab WILLIAM [!1! [OF?] "CHERNET" !1!].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  See 55,10 William note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab AETHELWARD. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Domesday and Exon }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Ageluuardus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see 36,2 Aethelward note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 1 VILLAGER AND 2 SMALLHOLDERS. The corresponding entry in Exon has '1 villager and 1 smallholder'; the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 7 }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is close to the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 i. bord' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
and was possibly mistaken for a second }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 i}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  by the main scribe of Great Domesday.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 55,10 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,15\tab [Exon 56b2]
\par \tab BERE [REGIS]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Identified by }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 274 (after Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dorset Survey}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
pp. 115-16), and by }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 104 no. 390, as Dodding's farm in Bere Regis, but no evidence is cited. See 54,12 Milborne note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab "LEOMER".}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Leomer}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Exon }{\i\f827\cf1\insrsid9113064 Le\'f4maer'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, which only occur here in Domesday. As these forms might represent Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Leodm\'bfr}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  or Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Leofm\'bfr}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  (von Feilitzen, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 319), it has been decided for the present revision to retain the Domesday form. The Alecto edition has Leomer. The Phillimore printed edition has Leofmer.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \'bd HIDE. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'There is not now, nor was, more than \'bd hide of land and it paid tax for as much before 1066'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab LAND FOR \'bd PLOUGH. In the manuscript there is a pale orange blot of ink (or perhaps a water blot), probably contemporary, partially obscuring the }{\i\f827\cf1\insrsid9113064 \'e7 }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 of }{
\i\f827\cf1\insrsid9113064 T'ra \'e7 }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ... . See 1,24 pasture note for a similar blot.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab A MILL WHICH PAYS 20s. The corresponding entry in Exon has
 'A mill at 20s'. As in Domesday, the mill is written before the smallholder, meadow and pasture (another example of the main scribe of Great Domesday copying from Exon); the livestock in Exon are also written out of the usual order.}{\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 55,15a\tab [Exon 56b3]}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WILLIAM ... 20s. Close study of the manuscript (done for the Phillimore printed edition) of the size of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 W }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Will's }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
and the amount of red ink applied to it, and comparison with the similar Devon 3,32;71 (see DEV 3,32 before note and DEV 3,71 details 
note) suggests that this is not a subdivision of 55,15 (as first thought), but a separate entry (as it is in Exon). There is no evidence there that William is William of Moutiers or that the 1 \'bd virgates were in Bere Regis.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,16\tab [Exon 56b4]
\par \tab WALTER [!1! THUNDER !1!]. On his byname, see 55,16 Puddle note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab [TURNERS] PUDDLE.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  In the corresponding entry, after the statement that Gerling held it }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 T.R.E.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, Exon has 'Hugh [son of Grip] held this manor for 6 hides and there is \'bd hide, 4 acres and a garden; it has never paid tax, but [the tax on it] has been concealed'. The Latin for the second half of this is }{\i\f820\cf1\insrsid9113064 qu\'ea nunq}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 uam}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  gildavit sed celatu}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 m}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  e}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 st}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ];}{\i\f820\cf1\insrsid9113064  qu\'ea }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is feminine singular and could refer to the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 mansio }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 'manor' (as in other similar instances) or to the 
\'bd hide. The latter is proved to be the case in the Tax Return for Bere Hundred which states that the king has never had tax from \'bd hide which Walter Thunder holds from Hugh's wife. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Celatum est }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
is neuter singular and is probably a }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 constructio ad sensum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 the Exon scribe understanding }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 geldum }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (neuter) out of }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 gildavit}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 :}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 'the tax has been concealed', as in 27,10 (see 27,10 virgate note).}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab The land can thus be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Bere Hundred. The affixed name is from the byname of Walter found in the Tax Return and in Exon: }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 tonitrus }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 tonitruum }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 respectively, from Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 tonare}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Old French }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 toner }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
('to thunder'); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 295; Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 382. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 37, the land is held by Henry }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Tonere }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from the heirs of William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Gouiz}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and is named }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pydele Tunere }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. (Henry III) no. 580 dating from 1264; see DOR 55 wife note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab GERLING. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 In the corresponding entry in Exon }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Ierlincus }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (not }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Lerlincus }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 as Ellis printed); see von Feilitzen, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 260.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab TAX FOR 6 HIDES. The details amount to 5 hides; see 1,19 tax note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab IN LORDSHIP 2 PLOUGHS; 4 \'bd HIDES. In the corresponding entry in Exon }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 in dominio }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is omitted, perhaps in error.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab MILL ... YEAR. There is no apparent reason why the main scribe of Great Domesday omitted the mill details: the corresponding Exon entry is neat and clear and written by one scribe. However, the mill appears 
after the woodland, meadow and pasture, rather than in its usual place before them. Compare 36,8 woodland note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 55,1 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,17\tab [Exon 57a1]
\par \tab HUGH [* OF BOSCHERBERT *].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Hugh of Boscherbert; see the Exon addition to 36,3. He may also be the subtenant Hugh in 55,18.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab WINTERBORNE [HOUGHTON].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .This 'Winterborne' is identified by the fact that the disputed 1 virgate is part of William of Mohun's manor of Winterborne Houghton (36,3). The affix }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Houghton }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 may be derived from Hugh of Boscherbert or Hugh son of Grip: }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 129.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 55,1 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab HUGH [* OF BOSCHERBERT *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab TO WILLIAM OF MOHUN. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'to William of Mohun's manor'; that is, of Winterborne [Houghton], 36,3.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,18\tab [Exon 57a2]
\par \tab HUGH [* OF BOSCHERBERT *].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  See 55,17 Hugh note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab BRIDGE. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 49,13 Bridge note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 55,1 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,19\tab [Exon 57b1]
\par \tab WILLIAM [!1! OF DAUMERAY !1!]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The corresponding entry in Exon has }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de almereio}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; Domesday has }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Dalmari }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
for 57,4;11. Daumeray is in the d\'e9partement of Maine-et-Loire, France; see Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 85. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 93, Jordan }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Stertel }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 holds \'bd fee in Sturthill and the other half in Walditch (57,11) which is likewise held in 1086 by William of Daumeray.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 55,1 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,20\tab [Exon 57b2]
\par \tab WILLIAM [* OF DAUMERAY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab GRASTON. In 'Goderthorn' Hundred, held by the Abbot of Abbotsbury from William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Gouiz }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 11.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab IN LORDSHIP 1 PLOUGH. The corresponding entry in Exon has '... 1 \'bd ploughs'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 15? CATTLE. The Exon manuscript for the corresponding entry has }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 v. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 with an }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 x.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  interlined above it; the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 x. }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 could either be intended to add to the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 v. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 making }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 xv.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 or as a replacement, making '10 cattle'.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 55,1 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,21\tab [Exon 57b3]
\par \tab FARNHAM }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ... SHAFTESBURY CHURCH. See 19,11 Farnham note and 49,17 Shaftesbury note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab PLOUGH THERE. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Ilbert has 1 plough there'; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 in dominio }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 not mentioned, either in error or because implied.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WHEN H[UGH] ACQUIRED IT. Hugh son of Grip. Likewise for 55,25;27;36.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,22\tab [Exon 58a1]
\par \tab PUNCKNOWLE.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  In 'Uggescombe' Hundred, held by William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Wytefeuld }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 filius Pagani }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 5, 34, 53.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 55,1 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 55,23\tab [Exon 58a2]
\par \tab TATTON. It can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Uggescombe' Hundred. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 93, in 'Uggescombe' Hundred, Avicia }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Tatton' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
holds in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Tatton' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from Alfred of Lincoln.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab [PART] OF THE LORDSHIP OF THE ABBEY OF CERNE. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'which in 1066 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 die obit}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 us}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 ed}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 wardi}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  regis}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
literally 'on the day of King Edward's death', an unusual phrase in Exon) were Cerne Abbey's own' (or 'the Abbot of Cerne's own': }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 p}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ro}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
prie abb' cerneliensis}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 abb'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  can abbreviate both }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 abbatia }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 abbas}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , see 37,1 abbot note).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab BEFORE 1066 TWO THANES ... . Or perhaps the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 T.R.E. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 belongs with the preceding phrase: '... which were [part] of the lordship of the Abbey of Cerne before 
1066. Two thanes held ...'. Exon favours this alternative; see 55,23 Cerne note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab HUGH ... ABBOT. The corresponding entry in Exon adds 'and his wife still keeps them back'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab DESPITE THE ABBOT. The Latin is }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 sup}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 er}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  abb}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 at}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 em}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 super }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('over', 'against') is 
difficult to render in this sense. The primary notion is that of a battle or contest, fair or unfair, in which Hugh 'wins' and the abbot 'loses'; compare CAM 3,5. The reality, however, could be that the land was taken against the abbot's wish or without h
is knowledge.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,24\tab [Exon 58a3]
\par \tab WALTER [* THUNDER *]. See 55,24 Loders note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab LODERS. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The land held by Walter (perhaps Walter Thunder; see 55,16 Puddle note) is probably }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Lodres Luttone }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (now Matravers) held by }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Egidius Tonere }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 11, in 'Goderthorn' Hundred from William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Gouiz}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
see1,13 Loders note and 26,41 Loders note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 1 VILLAGER. The corresponding entry in Exon has '1 countryman' (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 rusticus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
a rare term in Domesday; see WIL 67,66 countrymen note and WOR 2,57 countryman note and compare 11,12 villagers note).}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab PASTURE. The main scribe of Great Domesday originally wrote }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 p'ti }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (= }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 prati }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 'meadow'). It was then changed to }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
p'st'e }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 for }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 pasture}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , genitive. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pastura }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is not normally abbreviated in Domesday.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 55,1 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 55,25\tab [Exon 58a4]}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \'bd HIDE. Only the lordship land (1 virgate) is detailed, the villagers' land holding being omitted; see1,18 tax note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab `TARRANT'. This holding can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Langeburgh' Hundred, but no hundred
 can be assigned to the places called 'Tarrant' in 55,29-30. One of the three holdings was probably Tarrant Rawston held as Tarrant }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Antioch }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 127) by Nicholas }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Antioche }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 43, and in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 751, whe
re he holds from Alfred of Lincoln. The wife of Hugh also seems to have held land in Tarrant Gunville, since 'Higher Barn Down' and 'Lower Barn Down', lost places in that parish, were earlier }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Barndedon' Gouytz}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
; see}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 243.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 1 VILLAGER AND 1 SMALLHOLDER. The corresponding entry in Exon has '1 villager who lives there has the other virgate and \'bd
 plough. Hugh's wife has 1 villager and 1 smallholder'. There was probably only 1 villager there; but see SOM 5,21 villagers note and DEV
 1,9 villagers note for the splitting of the 'villagers' into those with the land and ploughs and those presumably without them.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab HUGH [* SON OF GRIP *]. See 55,21 H[ugh] note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 55,26\tab [Exon 58b1]
\par \tab [WIDTH]. As Exon; Domesday has }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 l'g }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in error.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 55,1 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 55,27\tab [Exon 58b2]}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab `WINTERBORNE'. }{\insrsid9113064 Domesday }{\i\insrsid9113064 Wintreburne}{\insrsid9113064 . It was identified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 
, iii. p. 106 no. 402, as Winterborne Stickland, but as a place lying on the eastern River Winterborne by }{\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{\insrsid9113064 . }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
This and the next 'Winterborne (55,28) lay on the upper reaches of the eastern River Winterborne, and are perhaps Quarleston in Winterborne Stickland; see 55,1 Martinstown note and \{Introduction: Hundreds\}.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab H[UGH SON OF GRIP]. See 55,21 H[ugh] note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,28\tab [Exon 58b3]
\par \tab `WINTERBORNE'. Domesday }{\i\insrsid9113064 Wintreburne}{\insrsid9113064 . It was identified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 106 no. 403, as Winterborne Stickland, but as a place lying on the eastern River Winterborne by 
}{\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{\insrsid9113064 . }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 55,27 'Winterborne' note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 1 HIDE AND 1 VIRGATE OF LAND, [***]. There is a gap in the manuscript after this, extending to the end of the line, perhaps intended for the plough estimate. Exon does not give one either; see 1,1 life note.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab IN LORDSHIP \'bd PLOUGH. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Robert has \'bd plough there'; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 in dominio }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 probably omitted in error.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE. In the corresponding entry in Exon this is reversed: the value is now 25s and was 20s when H[ugh] acquired it. For other examples of this, see SOM 8,5 Roger note, SOM 26,4 value note and SOM 45,12 value note.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab KING WILLIAM ... 1 VIRGATE. This information also appears in the Tax Return for 'Hundesburge'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,29\tab [Exon 59a1]
\par \tab `TARRANT'. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The 1086 hundred is unknown, though the place may be Tarrant Rawston from the name of the subtenant; see 54,9 'Tarrant' note and 55,25 'Tarrant' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab MEADOW, 16 ACRES. The Exon manuscript for the corresponding entry has '17 acres': }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .xvi. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 changed to }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .xvii. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 with }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
agros }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 inter\-lined. Ellis (who printed }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 xvi}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,),}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and probably the main scribe of Great Domesday, mistook the added }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 i }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 as an omission mark (for }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 agros}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ),}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 but it is quite clearly the lengthened }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 i }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
usually written to emphasize a corrected figure.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab PASTURE, 8 FURLONGS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'pas
ture, 8 furlongs in both length and width', which would appear from 47,9 (see 47,9 woodland note) to mean that the pasture measured 8 furlongs by 8 furlongs. See also for 55,36;38;40. On furlongs, see 1,1 furlongs note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WOODLAND ... WIDTH. See 36,8 woodland note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 
VALUE WAS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Value when R[alph] acquired it'. See 55,30 value note and DEV 16,88 formerly note for other examples of the past value of a manor being when it was acquired by the subtenant, rather than by the te
nant-in-chief (as is usually the case). See also DEV 3,22 formerly note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,30\tab [Exon 59a2]
\par \tab `TARRANT'. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 55,25 'Tarrant' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. 'Value when B[erold] acquired it'; see 55,29 value note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,31\tab [Exon 59a3]
\par \tab LANGTON [HERRING].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Uggescombe' Hundred. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 93, it is held from Alfred of Lincoln in 'Uggescombe' Hundred and in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 6, half the village is held of the fee of William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Gouiz}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
the other half no doubt representing the king's land (1,23). For the gift of Langton Herring to the priory of Holme, a cell of Montacute, see DOR 55 wife note. The wife of Hugh held land in another Langton ('Langton Wallis'); see 37,13 wife note.}{
\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 55,1 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,32\tab [Exon 59b1]
\par \tab TWO MEN-AT-ARMS}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  HOLD \'bd HIDE ... MEADOW ... PASTURE. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Two men-at-arms hold it [the \'bd hide] from Hugh's wife, except for 16 acres of meadow which she holds herself in lords
hip (Ellis omitted the superscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 s}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  above }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 agri }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and above }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 quo }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
in this interlined clause). One of them, Turold, has 10 cattle, 20 goats, 2 acres of meadow and 100 acres of pasture. The other man-at-arms [has] as much in acres (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 agraru}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 m}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ];}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 or possibly }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 agroru}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 m}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
'fields') and pastures and no livestock (}{\i\f820\cf1\insrsid9113064 nihil pecun\'ea}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )'.}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
This unnamed man-at arms may be Hugh, the subtenant of 55,33-34. See DEV 3,91 lordship note for another example of the lordship of a manor remaining with the tenant-in-chief and not passing to the
 subtenant with the rest of the manor; and compare DEV 19,36 where the lordship is held by the villager, and 47,10 thanes note where it is held by the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 T.R.E.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  tenants.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab RUSHTON. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 55,35 Warmwell note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab THREE THANES HELD IT FREELY. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Three thanes held before 1066 and they could go with their land to whichever lord they would'; see 55,6 freely note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,33\tab [Exon 59b2]
\par \tab HUGH [* OF BOSCHERBERT *]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The corresponding entry in Exon has 'A man-at-arms of hers', with 'Hugh' interlined. Likewise for 55,34. On his byname, see 55,33 Chaldon note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab CHALDON.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Probably West Chaldon, held as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Chauedon Boys }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 by William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Gouiz }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 1; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 750; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. (Edward I) no. 541; Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 339; and 1,12 Chaldon note. The affixed name }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Boys}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Medieval Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 boscus}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 French }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 bois }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('wood') may be from the byname of the 1086 tenant, Hugh [of Boscherbert], or a descendant; see 55,46.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab NINE THANES. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 In the manuscript and Farley }{\i\f827\cf1\insrsid9113064 Nou\'e7}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
the Ordnance Survey facsimile fails to reproduce the abbreviation sign.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 55,1 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab IN HUGH ^[SON OF GRIP]^ 'S}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  LIFE-TIME. The exact date of Hugh son of Grip's death is not known; see B1 H
ugh note and DOR 49 Aiulf note. Compare Domesday DEV 1,30 before note for probably another example of the value of a manor being given for three dates.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,34\tab [Exon 60a1]
\par \tab HUGH [* OF BOSCHERBERT *]. For the wording in }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 the corresponding entry in Exon, s}{\insrsid9113064 ee 55,33 Hugh note. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 On his byname, see 55,34 Ringstead note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab RINGSTEAD.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  The two holdings here (55,34;36) are possibly represented by 'East Ringstead' and 'West Ringstead', both held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 9, 29, by William }
{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Gouiz}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 . A comparison of the two surveys in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 suggests that 'Up Ringstead' may have been a part of 'West Ringstead': the holding of Milton Abbey from Nicholas }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Antyoch }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (who holds from William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Gouiz}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is called 'West Ringstead' in one and 'Up Ringstead' in the other. See 52
,2 Ringstead note. The wife of Hugh may have held another part of Ringstead from Cerne Abbey (11,6 Poxwell note). The holder of 'East Ringstead' in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 9, Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Bosco
}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 may be a descendant of Hugh (of Boscherbert; see 55,46) the 1086 holder. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 750, and in the grant to East Holme Priory (DOR 55 wife note), Alfred of Lincoln holds a place called }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Watercombe}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
This is probably Watercombe adjacent to Ringstead (see 1,29), rather than Whatcombe farm (ST8301) in Winterborne Whitechurch which the wife of Hugh also held (55,1 Martinstown note; see Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 199).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab WULFNOTH ... }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 FREELY. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'A thane, Wulfnoth, held it; he could go to whichever lord he would'; see 55,6 freely note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 2 SMALLHOLDERS. In the manuscript and Farley }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ii. bord'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
the Ordnance Survey facsimile fails to reproduce most of the first minim which is rather faint in the manuscript, making the number appear }{\b\cf1\up6\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 i.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 55,1 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,35\tab [Exon 60a2]
\par \tab TUROLD. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The corresponding entry in Exon has 'A man-at-arms of hers, Turold'. Perhaps the same man as one of the subtenants of 55,32 (see 55,32 men-at-arms note).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WARMWELL. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wermewell' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is a fee of Alfred of Lincoln in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 750; it is held from William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Gouiz }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Winfrith Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 9, and coupled with }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Rysston }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Rushton, 55,32] in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 30.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab TAX FOR 1 \'bd HIDES. Perhaps a mistake for 'l \'bd hides and 1 virgate' since the corresponding entry in Exon has 'It paid tax for l \'bd
 hides and 1 virgate', which agrees with the details of lordship and villagers' land held. As the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .i. virg' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
on a new line it could easily have been missed by the main scribe of Great Domesday.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 55,1 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,36\tab [Exon 60a3]
\par \tab RALPH [!1! THE STEWARD !1!]. In}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  the corresponding entry in Exon }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 dapifer}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 He was Ralph of Montpin\'e7on (in the d\'e9
partement of Calvados, France); see Orderic Vitalis, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Ecclesiastical History}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , (Chibnall, iii. pp. 164-67).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab RINGSTEAD. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 55,34 Ringstead note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab HUNWIN.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Onouuin}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 us}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ],}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Exon }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Honowin}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 us}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ] represents Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hunwine}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 296.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab PASTURE, 4 FURLONGS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Pasture, 4 furlongs in both length and width'; see 55,29 pasture note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab HUGH [* SON OF GRIP *]. See 55,21 H[ugh] note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,37\tab [Exon 60b1]
\par \tab ROBERT [!1! THE CORN-DEALER !1!].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  In the corresponding entry in Exon }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Frum'tinus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 a garbled form of Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
frumentarius }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 due to the loss of the second contraction mark and confusion of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 -rius }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 -inus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Not as Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 219.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab "BOLN".}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Boln}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Exon }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bolo}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 . It is suggested by von Feilitzen, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 206, that, because of the Exon form, Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bolla}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 was likely to be represented. The Phillimore printed edition has Bolle. In the present revision of name-forms the variant forms found in 'satellite' texts such as Exon, the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Inquisitio Comitatus Cantabrigiensis}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Inquisitio Eliensis}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Domesday Monachorum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 etc. have been disregarded, so, as there is no certainty as to the name represented by the Domesday form }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Boln}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , it seems safest to keep to that. The Alecto edition has Boln.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \'bd PLOUGH ... THERE. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Robert has \'bd plough'; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 in dominio }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 perhaps omitted in error.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab PASTURE ... 3 FURLONGS IN WIDTH. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Pasture ... 4 furlongs in width', the last }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 i }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .iiii. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
being badly written and slightly apart 
from the rest (probably the reason why the main scribe of Great Domesday missed it). Both meadow and pasture are interlined by a different Exon scribe to the rest of the entry, suggesting some sort of correction of the text here, though at an early stage,
 before the manuscript was seen by the main Domesday scribe.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,38\tab [Exon 60b2]
\par \tab ROBERT [!1! BOY !1!].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Puer}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  in the corresponding entry in Exon;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 similar to }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 cilt }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
'Young', it was probably used as 'younger' to distinguish from a senior Robert. Compare Gruffydd Boy in HEF 1,34-35.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WOODLAND, 1 FURLONG. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'woodland, 1 furlong in length and as much in width'; see 55,29 pasture note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab A BURGESS. Probably in Wareham which is the closest borough to Hurpston.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 55,1 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 55,39\tab [Exon 60b3]
\par \tab \'bd HIDE. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'a manor ... it paid tax for \'bd hide'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE 12s 6d. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'This land has been completely laid waste (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 om}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 n}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ino deuastata
 e}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 st}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]);}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 however (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 tamen}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
the value is 12s 6d'. The Latin implies that the land had been devastated (reason unknown), not merely that it had lain untilled, which is a possible meaning for }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 wasta }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
(see WOR 8,8 and WOR 8,8 waste note), especially in an entry where population and resources are mentioned and which has a value, despite being 'waste'. See also HEF 6,1 waste note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,40\tab [Exon 60b4]
\par \tab WILKSWOOD.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  It can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Ailwood (later Rowbarrow) Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab TAX FOR 3 \'bd HIDES AND 2 PARTS OF 1 VIRGATE. The detail amounts to only 3 \'bd hides; see 1,19 tax note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WOODLAND, 4 FURLONGS. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'woodland, 4 furlongs in length and width'; see 55,29 pasture note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 55,1 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,41\tab [Exon 61a1]
\par \tab ACTON.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  In Langton Matravers parish and perhaps standing for it, Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Tacatone}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 34. It can be located by an analysis of the Tax Return for Ailwood (later Rowbarrow) Hundred; see 37,13 wife note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 55,1 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 55,42\tab [Exon 61a2]
\par \tab SWANAGE. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Swaneswich }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is held as a fee of Alfred of Lincoln in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 750; see 8,3 Buckland note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 1 PLOUGH ... THERE. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Walter has 1 plough there'; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 in dominio }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 omitted, perhaps in error.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 55,1 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 55,43\tab [Exon 61a3]}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab RALPH. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'A man-at-arms of hers', with 'Ralph' interlined.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab WORTH [MATRAVERS]. It f}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 alls in a group of places in Rowbarrow Hundred in the order of the text of Domesday. See 37,13 wife note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \'bd PLOUGH ... THERE. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Ralph has \'bd plough there'; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 in dominio }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 perhaps omitted in error.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,44\tab [Exon 61a4]
\par \tab `THORNE'. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Torne }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 was identified by Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dorset Survey}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 111-12, with Durnford, }{\insrsid9113064 left unidentified by }{
\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 109 no. 419, }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and identified by }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  with Thornham in Church Knowle. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. pp. 5, 35, 42, identifies it with the field name }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 La Thorne }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
at Court Pound, one-third of a mile west of Durnford House. In the order of the text, it falls naturally in a group of places in Rowbarrow Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab LAND FOR 1 PLOUGH. [***]. There is a gap of about 12 letters' width in the manuscript after this, probably left for details of population and resources, but see 1,2 woodland note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,45\tab [Exon 61b1]
\par \tab ROBERT, [!1! HUGH'S NEPHEW !1!].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  It is not clear from
 the corresponding entry in Exon which Hugh this is; whether Hugh son of Grip, or Hugh of Boscherbert who is the subtenant of the next entry, or even the Hugh who according to Exon was a man-at-arms of Hugh son of Grip's wife (55,33-34).}{\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab `THORNE'. Domesday }{\i\insrsid9113064 Torne}{\insrsid9113064 . It was left unidentified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 109 no. 420, but identified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{
\insrsid9113064  as Thornham. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 55,44 Thorne note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 1 PLOUGH ... THERE. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Robert has 1 plough and nothing more'; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 in}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 dominio }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 p
robably omitted in error or implied.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS. See 55,1 value note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,46\tab [Exon 61b2]
\par \tab HUGH [!1! OF BOSCHERBERT !1!].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Other occurrences of Hugh in this chapter may be the same man; see 55,33 Chaldon note and 55,34 Ringstead note. For the name, see DOR 53 Hugh note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,47\tab [Exon 61b3]
\par \tab SHE HOLDS ORCHARD. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The place can be identified from an analysis of the Hasler Hundred Tax Return. This may be the same holding as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Gardinum }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (French }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 jardin }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 'a garden'), held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 750, as a fee of Alfred of Lincoln and identical with the 'garden near Bradle' (DOR 55 wife note); it is }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Gardins }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. (Edward I) no. 541. Another gift of Hugh to Cranborne Church is Gillingham (10,1).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab FOUR THANES HELD ... . The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Four thanes held jointly ...'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab AN ORCHARD. It is }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 uirgultum }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (in Domesday and Exon), which usual
ly means in Classical Latin 'a thicket' or 'shrubbery', but a Mediaeval Latin extension of the meaning is 'orchard', the word being glossed by Ducange, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Glossarium}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 viridarium}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  pomarium}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The English place-name is probably due to the presence here of a notable orchard. See }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset
}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 90. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Uirgultum }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 also occurs in DEV 15,1 (see DEV 15,1 orchard note) where the Count of Mortain has one in Exeter, together with a church and a house.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The corresponding entry in Exon has '1 orchard'.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab HUGH [* SON OF GRIP *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab CHURCH OF CRANBORNE. The corresponding entry in Exon has 'Abbey of Cranborne'.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab HUGH'S WIFE HOLDS THE \'bd HIDE; VALUE 20s. In the corresponding entry in Exon, she also holds the smallholders and orchard. Exon also makes it clear that the interlined }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Valet .xx. sol' }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 belongs with the line below (that is the value of the \'bd hide), rather than with the line above (the orchard being valued at 20s), as the interlineation }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 xv solid' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
in 55,43 does. The value of the 1 \'bd hides is thus 40s.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55,48\tab [Exon 61b4]
\par \tab DURAND [!1! THE CARPENTER !1!] }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 HOLDS \'bd HIDE. The corresponding entry in Exon has }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 carpe'tari'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in the Tax Return }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 carpentari'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
it is not clear whether he was a carpenter by trade or the word had become a surname in his case by 1086. According to the Tax Return for Ailwood (later Rowbarrow) Hundred the king has not had tax from \'bd
 hide which Durand the carpenter holds from Hugh's wife.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 
ALL THE THANES ... COULD GO TO WHICH LORD THEY WOULD. In Exon this is mentioned, with the addition of 'with their land(s)', for 55,1;3-9;11;25;30;32;36-37. It is given as in Domesday for 55,34-35;48. It is not mentioned at all for 55,2;10;12-24;26-
29;31;33;38;40-47, although the 1066 holders are called 'thanes' for 55,40-42;44-46. The 1066 holders are not described as 'thanes' for 55,7;9;25;37.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab Thus this is a rather sweeping statement in Domesday: in 55,21 the 1066 holder Alwin is specifically said not to have been able to separate from Shaftesbury Church. See also 1,29 holders note and 58,3 she note.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 55a\tab [LAND OF ISOLDE]. In the manuscript there is a gap of two lines after 55,48 which is not reproduced in Farley. The space was not sufficient,
 however, for the main scribe of Great Domesday to insert the chapter heading when he rubricated the county and he omitted the chapter number too. See DOR 45 Alfred note. This manor is the only holding of Isolde given in Domesday; it may have passed to th
e honour of Gloucester with the other portion of Petersham (see 54,14 Petersham note). It lay in 'Canedone'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred in 1086 according to an analysis of the Tax Returns.
\par \tab \tab No corresponding entry in Exon survives for this chapter.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 55a,1\tab WADA [* SON OF AETHELGYTH *]. See the note by JP in 30,1 Wada note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56\tab LANDS OF THE KING'S THANES.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this chapter.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,1\tab MILTON[-ON-STOUR].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Mideltone }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Gillingham Hundred. It is probably the land held of the honour of Chewton (56,14 Edwin note) in Gillingham Hundred, in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 753; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 22, 32, 52.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,2\tab KINGTON. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Probably Kington Magna, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Mangna Kyngtone }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (that is, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Magna Kyngtone}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 held by Herbert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Sancto Quintino }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from the Earl of Gloucester in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 22, in Gillingham Hundred. It can also be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Gillingham Hundred. See 32,1 Kington note and 40,2 Kington note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab DODA [* THE MONK *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,3\tab EDWIN [* THE HUNTER *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,4\tab GODRIC [* THE HUNTER *]. P}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 robably Godric the hunter who holds 1 virgate in lordship in the Tax Return for Gillingham Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,5\tab WULFWIN <OF GILLINGHAM>. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The name Wulfwin occurs ten times in the south-western counties and may represent five or six individu
als. The tenant of the one 1086 holding, a tiny property at Gillingham in Dorset, may have been one of the pre-Conquest landowners surviving precariously though this is perhaps unlikely given the isolation of this holding (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,6\tab AELFRIC [* THE HUNTER *].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Perhaps Aelfric the hunter who is recorded in the Tax Return for Bere Hundred as holding 2 hides in lordship; the other hide is probably at 56,60.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab `WINTERBORNE'. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The location in Bere Hundred (according to an analysis of the Tax Return) suggests Winterborne Kingston (see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, iii. p. 134), which was in this hundred in 1285 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 12); see 55,11 'Winterborne' note. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 1387, Richard }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Wytewell' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 holds in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Kingeswynterburn'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Wytewille }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
holds a half of the same village in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 12, in Barrow Hundred. The other half is probably 55,11-12. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, v. (Edward II) no. 346, the same man holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wynterborn Regis}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Craweford }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (56,12) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bovyngton }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
(56,59) all held by Aelfric in 1086.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 56,7\tab MAPPOWDER. The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Buckland [Newton] Hundred and is probably the land held in that same hundred by Edward }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Mortuo Mari }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 30. See }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 425; and 56,9 Brictwin note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab HE HELD IT HIMSELF. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Ipse tenuit }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in the manuscript with a very faint }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 li }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (no doubt the beginning}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 libere}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 above the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 te- }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 tenuit}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 Farley printed the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 li}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 although it was probably erased.}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 56,7 thanes note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 7 FREE THANES. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Liberis}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  is}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 interlined to agree with thanes; perhaps a mistake for }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 libere}{\insrsid9113064  (}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 'freely') which should have been written earlier, where Farley mistakenly began the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 li}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 1,30 thanes note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab MEADOW, 16 [ACRES?]. After }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Ibi }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in the manuscript }{\i\f827\cf1\insrsid9113064 aliq't\'fb }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (= }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 aliquantum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 'a little') is written,}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 but underlined for deletion, and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .xvi. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 interlined above, though with no indication as to the}{
\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 measure; however, with only three exceptions (13,2. 24,4 and 55,5) meadow is recorded}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in acres in Domesday Dorset.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,8\tab BOLLA [* THE PRIEST *].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Probably Bolla the priest who holds 2 \'bd hides and \'bd virgate in lordship in the Tax Return for Cullifordtree Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab CHICKERELL. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 In Cullifordtree Hundred. It is West Chickerell, held as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Westchikerel }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 753, from M
argery }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Revets }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (of Redvers) who also holds 'Great Crawford' (56,12). This land passed to the Courcy family, like 35,1, and then to Matilda }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Revers}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 425, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 19, 38, 57.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,9\tab BRICTWIN [* THE REEVE *].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Perhaps Brictwin the reeve who holds 3 hides, less \'bd virgate, in lordship in the Tax Return for Cullifordtree Hundred. Many of Brictwin's lands are later found in}{
\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 the hands of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Mortuo Mari }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (Mortimer) family.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab `WEY'. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Cullifordtree Hundred; see 1,22 'Wey' note and \{Introduction: Places Named from Rivers\}
. The land appears to have been at 'Stottingway' in Upwey [at SY6684, a name in local use; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 247]. John }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Baiocis }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
holds a fee of Ralph of Mortimer in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Stokingway }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 426; it is }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Stottynways }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 20.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,10\tab BRICTWIN [* THE REEVE *].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  See 56,9 Brictwin note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab `WINTERBORNE'. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 One of the places on the River South Winterborne in Cullifordtree Hundred, according to an analysis of the Tax Return for that hundred; see \{Introduction: Places Named from Rivers\} and \{
Introduction: Hundreds\}. Descent from Brictwin was to the Mortimers; in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 425, Ralph }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Belet }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and Philip }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Mortimer }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 hold an unidentified Winterborne, perhaps 'Winterborne Belet'; see 57,3 note. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 6, and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iv (Edward I) no. 235, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wyntreborn Stupelton }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is held from Edmund }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Mortuo Mari}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Winterborne Steepleton is, however, in 'Uggescombe' Hundred and this cannot be reconciled with the evidence of the Tax Return.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,11\tab BRICTWIN [* THE REEVE *].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  See 56,9 Brictwin note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab LEWELL. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 57,2 Lewell note. It can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Cullifordtree Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,12\tab AELFRIC [* THE HUNTER *]. See 56,6 'Winterborne' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab `[GREAT] CRAWFORD'. Domesday }{\i\insrsid9113064 Craveford}{\insrsid9113064 . It was identified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 110 no. 436, as Tarrant Crawford, but by }{\i\insrsid9113064 
Domesday Gazetteer}{\insrsid9113064  as 'Great Crawford'. 'Great Crawford'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
 lay in Spetisbury parish, Loosebarrow Hundred, the other side of the River Stour from Tarrant [Crawford], the latter sometimes called Little Crawford (6,1 Tarra
nt note). In the order of the text it falls in the right place for a place in Loosebarrow Hundred coming before Morden, which can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Charborough (later Loosebarrow) Hundred. This lost place formed the sout
h-east end of the village of Spetisbury; see Taylor, 'Lost Dorset Placenames', p. 208; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Royal Commission on Historical Monuments }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ), iii. part 2, pp. 242-46; 
}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 64; Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 521. It is recorded on 
the first series one-inch Ordnance Survey map (no. 15 of 1811, reprint sheet 85 of 1969). See }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 753, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. pp. 28, 44, 47; and 1,5 Charlton note, 56,6 'Winterborne' note and 56,8 Chickerell note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab FOURTH PART OF A MILL WHICH PA
YS 30d. The rest of the mill is probably to be found at 57,4. It is not clear from the Latin whether the 30d is the payment of the whole mill or only of the quarter (see 55,13 mill note). 30d is one of the common payments from mills (for example, 2,6. 55,
3
;29), but if the payment of three-quarters of the same mill is 9s, then 30d is more likely to be the payment of the quarter. There is no reason for parts of the same mill to have paid equal renders, although they often did, as in WIL 24,20. 67,22-23;25 wh
ere each of the parts of a mill at Somerford rendered 15d (see also 1,29 mill note).}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS 30d; VALUE 40s. The sixteen-fold increase in value between 1066 and 1086 is unusual and may well be due to a scribal error ('40s' being a mistake for '40d', or
, more likely, '30d' a mistake for '30s'). Compare the lesser, though still large, increase in value in 49,14.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,13\tab WULFRIC [* THE HUNTER *]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Probably Wulfric the hunter who holds 1 \'bd hides in lordship in the Tax Return for Charborough (later Loosebarrow) Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab MORDEN.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 88, 260, Geoffrey }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Pourton' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Mordun' }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Loosebarrow Hundred. This same man holds Thorn Hill (56,18) which was also Wulfric's in 1086. The land appears in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 1182, as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Estmordon'}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 held from the barony of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Tyderleg' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (Tytherley, Hampshire); see 56,30 Wulfric note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WIFE OF WULFRIC'S BROTHER. She is perhaps the Wulfeva who is recorded in the Tax Return for Charborough Hundred as holding 3 virgates in lordship.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,14\tab EDWIN [* THE HUNTER *]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Edwin's lands descended to the Sifrewast family and formed part of the honour of Chewton; see 56,31Edwin note. On his identification, see 56,14 Blandford note.}{\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab BLANDFORD [ST MARY]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bleneforde}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see 26,29 Blandford note. It can be identified from 
an analysis of the Tax Return for Combsditch Hundred. Edwin the hunter is there recorded as having 3 hides and \'bd
 virgate in lordship. He also holds a 'Blandford' at 56,31, but this present land is most probably the Combsditch Blandford because of the odd \'bd
 virgate and because in the order of Domesday entries it is followed by another place in Combsditch Hundred, Thornicombe (see 56,15 Thornicombe note).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab [1] \'bd VIRGATES. See 12,16 hide note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,15\tab ALWARD [* COLLING *]. See 56,15 Thornicombe note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab THORNICOMBE. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 This estate can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Combsditch Hundred, where Alward Colling (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 colinc}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; see 1,23 Alward note)}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 holds 1 hide in lordship.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,16\tab WULFGEAT [* THE HUNTER *]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Probably Wulfgeat Hunter who holds 1 hide in lordship in the Tax Return for 'Alvredesberge' Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab WIMBORNE [ST GILES]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 This }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Winburne }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 lay in 'Alvredesberge' Hundred up the River Allen; see \{Introduction: Places Named from Rivers\}.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,17\tab BRICTWIN [* THE REEVE *].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Probably Brictwin the reeve who had 3 hides in lordship in the Tax Return for Yetminster Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab MELBURY.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  See 26,35 Melbury note. Ralph }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Mortimer }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Melebur' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 426; see 56,9 'Wey' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,18\tab WULFRIC [* THE HUNTER *]. See 56,18 Thorn note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab THORN HILL. The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Canedone'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred, where Wulfric is Wulfric the hunter with 1 virgate of lordship land. In }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 88, \'bd hide in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Thornhll' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Canendona }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred is held by Geoffrey }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
de Pourton'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , and in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 1182, from the manor of Tytherley; see 56,13 Morden note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 56,19\tab THE QUEEN GAVE THIS LAND TO ASCELIN. Queen Matilda; Ascelin (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Schelin }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in the manuscript; Farley misprinted }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Schelm}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is probably the same person as the Ascelin who according to Exon was her subtenant in 1,18;20.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab NOW THE KING HAS IT IN LORDSHIP. He also had in lordship another part of Hampreston which had belonged to Queen Matilda (1,19).}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,20\tab DODA [* THE MONK *]. See 56,20 queen note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \'bd HIDE. This unnamed holding falls among a group of places that probably lay in 'Canedone'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred (56,18-24).}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab QUEEN GAVE THIS LAND TO DODA IN ALMS. Doda is perhaps Doda the monk (57,8).}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,21\tab DODA [* THE MONK *]. See 56,20 queen note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WILKSWORTH. The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Canedone' Hundred.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WITH ... 2 SMALLHOLDERS WHO HAVE. Unless }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 habentes }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is a mistake for }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 habentibus }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (to agree with }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 uill}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 an}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 is }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 after the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 cum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ),}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
which is likely, the smallholders alone have the \'bd plough. Compare 11,3 villager note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 56,22\tab THE THIRD PART OF 1 VIRGATE OF LAND. The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Canedone' Hundred. The odd one-third virgate may be connected with the 3 \u8531\'3f virgates of Hampreston (56,19).}{
\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,23\tab WILKSWORTH. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Canedone' Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,24\tab WALFORD. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Canedone' Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,26\tab `WINTERBORNE'.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  This 'Winterborne' can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Combsditch Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 56,27\tab 1 VIRGATE OF LAND AND 4 ACRES. This unnamed land can be located in Badbury Hundred from an analysis of the Tax Returns.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab MEADOW, 9 ACRES. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Acras}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  is}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 accusative after }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 habet}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,28\tab SWEIN [* OF ESSEX *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab WINTERBORNE [HOUGHTON]. Domesday}{\i\insrsid9113064  Wintreburne}{\insrsid9113064 . It was left unidentified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 
, iii. p. 111 no. 452, but identified as a place lying on the south River Winterborne by }{\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{\insrsid9113064 . However, t}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
his land, like Plumber (56,29), was held by Swein in 1086 and by the Earl of Salisbury in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 753, as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Winterborn' Moyun}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 see 36,3 Winterborne note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab VALUE WAS 100s. In the manuscript the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 c }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 has been corrected from another figure, perhaps }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 v }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (5).}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,29\tab SWEIN [* OF ESSEX *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab PLUMBER.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Plumber' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is a Salisbury fee in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 753, and is held by Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Plomber 
}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from the honour of Canford (see 31,1 Canford note) in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 27, 47.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,30\tab WULFRIC THE HUNTER }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
... 1 HIDE. Wulfric's lands later formed part of the manor or sergeanty of Tytherley, named from the holding of Tytherley mentioned in Domesday Wiltshire (WIL 67,66), although it actually lay in Hampshire. The present land, lying in Woodlands parish in Kn
owlton Hundred, is variously named. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 88, it is }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cnolle }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Knowle Hill, SU0309], held by Geoffrey }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Pourton' }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 (56,13 Morden note); in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 1182, it is }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Chnoldon }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Knowlton, SU0210], held of the barony of Tytherley, and in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 1268, and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 13, it is 1 hide in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Baggeriggestrete }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
['Baggeridge', lost in Woodlands, probably near Bagmans Copse and farm, SU032091; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 284-285; Taylor, 'Lost Dorset Placenames', pp. 209-210].}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,31\tab EDWIN [* THE HUNTER *]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 This Edwin is probably Edwin the hunter who is named in full in the Tax Return for 'Langeburgh'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Hundred where Langton Long Blandford probably lay; }{\insrsid9113064 see 56,31 Blandford note.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab His lands formed the}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 honour of Chewton (56,14 Edwin note).}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab [LANGTON LONG] BLANDFORD.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  The 'Langeburgh'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Hundred Tax Return records Edwin the hunter as holding 2 hides and 3 virgates of lordship land, no doubt part of his 5 hides at }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bleneford}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
see 26,29 Blandford note and 56,14 Blandford note. This land is found in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 753, as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Blaneford Philippi de Tylly }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 107), held from the honour of Chewton (see 56,14 Edwin note).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab A MILL. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 molin'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Farley misprinted }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 moin'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,32\tab EDWIN [* THE HUNTER *]. Probably the Edwin the hunter who is named in full as holding 2 hides and 1 virgate, less 4 acres, of lordship land in the Tax Return for Pimperne Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab LAZERTON. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Werne}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 named from the River Iwerne; see 30,3 Ranston note. This holding is locatable 
in Pimperne Hundred from an analysis of the Tax Returns; see also 56,32 Edwin note. Lazerton was held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 753, from the honour of Chewton as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Latherton'}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Lazerton farm lies in Stourpaine parish, but close to the boundary of Iwerne Stepleton; see 26,3 Hanford note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,33\tab EDWIN [* THE HUNTER *]. Probably the Edwin the hunter who is named in full as holding 2 hides and \'bd virgate of lordship land in the Tax Return for 'Uggescombe' Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab SHILVINGHAMPTON. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 This holding can be identified as lying in 'Uggescombe' Hundred from an analysis of the Tax Returns; see also 56,33 Edwin note. It is held by Richard }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Sifrewast }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 92, from the honour of Chewton; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 6, 34, 53.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,34\tab WULFGEAT [* THE HUNTER *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab BRYANSTON.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bleneford}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 . }{\insrsid9113064 It was identified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 
, iii. p. 111 no. 458, as Langton Long Blandford, followed by }{\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{\insrsid9113064 .
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab There is no Tax Return evidence to locate this 
place. In the order of Domesday entries, it falls after Shilvinghampton which can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Uggescombe' Hundred (see 56,33 Shilvinghampton note). Since other lands in 'Hundesburge'}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred are grouped with those in 'Uggescombe' Hundred, it is possible that this 'Blandford' is Bryanston; see 26,29 Blandford note. This is given some support by }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 87, which records a grant of Bryanston in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundesburg' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundred by William I; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 1, 43.
 None of the other places callled 'Blandford' in DOR 56 could have been in this hundred; see Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 248.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,35\tab BRICTWIN [* THE REEVE *]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The Brictwin of this and the next entry is probably Brictwin the reeve who holds 2 \'bd hides in lordship in the Tax Return for Eggardon Hundred and likewise 1 hide and 3 \'bd
 virgates in lordship in the Tax Return for 'Uggescombe' Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab CHILCOMBE. This lay in Eggardon Hundred in 1086 according to an analysis of the Tax Returns. It was later in 'Uggescombe' Hundred. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Chiltecumbe }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
in Eggardon Hundred is held from Edmund }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Mortuo Mari }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (Mortimer) in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 3; see 56,9 Brictwin note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,36\tab BRICTWIN [* THE REEVE *]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 56,35 Brictwin note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab WADDON. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The place can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Uggescombe' Hundred. The estate probably lay at Waddon }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Krey }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [Little Waddon; see F\'e4
gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 250], held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 34, from Edmund of Mortimer; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, pp. 93, 426; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 53; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iv. (Edward I) no. 235.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab THE COUNT OF MORTAIN NOW HOLDS IT. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Quod }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 presumably refers to }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 manerium }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
understood. The other land exchanged does not seem to be mentioned in Domesday. The Mortain interest in Waddon is recalled in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 7.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,37\tab BRICTWIN [* THE REEVE *].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  The Brictwin of 56,37-38 would appear to be Brictwin the reeve who is s
aid in the Tax Return for Chilbury Hundred to hold 3 hides and 1 virgate in lordship. Presumably the Brictwin of 56,39-40 was also the reeve; see 56,40 Stinsford note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab MORETON. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 This place lay in Chilbury Hundred in 1086 according to an analysis of the Ta
x Returns. It is held in Winfrith Hundred (with which Chilbury Hundred was later merged) by Reginald son of Peter (a Mortimer tenant; see 56,9 Brictwin note) in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 30.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,38\tab BRICTWIN [* THE REEVE *]. See 56,37 Brictwin note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab GALTON. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Chilbury Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,39\tab BRICTWIN [* THE REEVE *]. See 56,37 Brictwin note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab RINGSTEAD. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 52,2 Ringstead note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab LAND FOR. Before }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 T'ra}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  in the manuscript is written an }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 7}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , no doubt a mistake: part of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 T }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 T'ra }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 covers most of it. This is not shown in Farley. The same thing happens in 36,10 and 57,7;15; see 36,10 Alward note, 57,7 land note and 57,15 woodland note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab SIX MEN HOLD IT AT A REVENUE. That is, they paid rent for it: }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Domesday Geography of South-West England}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 92 note 5. See 47,7 hides note and 47,7 man-at-arms note.}{\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,40\tab BRICTWIN [* THE REEVE *]. See 56,40 Stinsford note and 56,37 Brictwin note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab STINSFORD. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Most of this village lay in Dorchester Hundred in 1086
 (52,1 Stinsford note). But in the order of this chapter, Brictwin's Stinsford falls between two places in Cullifordtree Hundred. Moreover, Brictwin the reeve has no lordship land in the Tax Return for Dorchester Hundred but 3 hides, less \'bd
 virgate, in that for Cullifordtree.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab AIULF [* THE CHAMBERLAIN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab BRICTWIN [* THE REEVE *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,41\tab BRICTWIN [* THE REEVE *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab BRIDGE. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 49,13 Bridge note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab THESE LANDS. That is, 56,40-41.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,42\tab EDRIC [* THE REEVE *]. See 56,43 holds note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 56,43\tab HE ALSO HOLDS. As the Edric of 56,43;49 is probably Edric the reeve who is rec
orded as holding 1 hide in lordship in the Tax Return for Hasler Hundred, all these references here (56,42-47;49) are probably to Edric the reeve.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab [EAST] HOLME. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 41,3 Holme note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,44\tab EDRIC [* THE REEVE *]. See 56,43 holds note}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab `STOKE [WALLIS]'. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Stoche}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
If 'Studley' (56,45;47) has been correctly identified, 56,44-47 would form a natural grouping of places in Whitchurch Hundred, thus helping to identify this 'Stoke'. See 33,5 Stoke note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,45\tab EDRIC [* THE REEVE *]. See 56,43 holds note}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab `STUDLEY'. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Slitlege}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Stodlege}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  (56,45;47)}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
may well be different renderings of the same lost place-name; see F\'e4gersten, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 298 note 1. At least one of these holdings is required to make}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
up the total of Edric's lordship in Whitchurch Hundred Tax Return.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,46\tab EDRIC [* THE REEVE *]. See 56,43 holds note}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab PILSDON. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Whitchurch Hundred. It had belonged to Glastonbury}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Abbey; see the Glastonbury Feodary (Weaver, p. 48). Although Domesday does not record the alienation, it is held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 38,}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from Glastonbury Abbey.}{
\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,47\tab EDRIC [* THE REEVE *]. See 56,43 holds note}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab `STUDLEY'. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 56,45 'Studley' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,48\tab GODRIC [* THE PRIEST *]. See 56,58 Briantspuddle note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab BRIANTSPUDDLE. It}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  can be located by an analysis of the Tax Return for Bere Hundred, where Godric is Godric the priest holding 4 hides, less 10 acres, in lordship. Briantspuddle is also called }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Prestes Puddle }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. pp. 289-90) possibly from Godric the priest. As }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Prestpiddle }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
it was confirmed on Christchurch, at 'Twynham' (now itself known as Christchurch) in Hampshire, by William Rufus and in the grant said to be near Affpuddle: }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 i. no. 361 p. 93.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,49\tab EDRIC [* THE REEVE *]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 56,43 holds note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab TYNEHAM. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The land can be identified from the fact that Edric the reeve holds 1 hide of lordship land in the Tax Return for Hasler Hundred in 1086; see 56,43 holds note}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,50\tab DODA [* THE MONK *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab WOOLCOMBE. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Now in Toller Porcorum, Tollerford Hundred. This entry and that at 57,8 can, however, be located in Eggardon Hundred in 1086 according to an analysis of the Tax Returns.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,51\tab LODERS.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  See 1,13 Loders note. This holding is probably to be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Eggardon Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,52\tab AELFRIC [* THE HUNTER *]. See 56,52 Blackmanston note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab BLACKMANSTON.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  The entry seems to be duplicated in 56,65; see the Tax Return for Hasler Hundred, which states that Aelfric the hunter holds \'bd hide in lordship.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab LAND FOR 1 PLOUGH. [***]. The rest of the line has been left blank after this, presumably for further details, which were never added because of the repetition of the entry in 56,65.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,53\tab SWEIN [* OF ESSEX *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab MILBORNE [STILEHAM].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  The holding can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Bere Hundred; see 46,1 Milborne note. The hidage appears to have been omitted in error, but must have been at least 1 
\'bd hides because in the above Tax Return the king has not had tax from 1 \'bd hides which Osmund holds from Swein. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 12 (Barrow Hundred), the}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
land is measured in carucates, one each being held by the Abbot of Bec and John }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de la Strode }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from the heirs of the Earl Marshall.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab OSMUND [* THE INTERPRETER *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,54\tab GODRIC [* THE PRIEST *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab [STOURTON] CAUNDLE. Se}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 e 26,70 Caundle note. Godric's land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Brunsell Hundred and may be the land held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 89, by Henry }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Toneir'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 a grant made }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de conquestu}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 56,55\tab [PURSE] CAUNDLE. }{\insrsid9113064 Domesday }{\i\insrsid9113064 Candele}{\insrsid9113064 . It was identified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 112 no. 478, as Stourton Caundle but by }{
\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{\insrsid9113064  as Caundle Marsh. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 15,1 Caundle note and 26,70 Caundle note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab In the Tax Return for Sherborne Hundred, \'bd hide and \'bd virgate, on which Saeward has not paid tax, are listed. These must correspond to the 2 \'bd virgates of the present holding. With the 4 hides and 1 \'bd virgat
es of Purse Caundle held by Athelney Abbey (15,1) they formed a 5-hide unit. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 103b, records Athelney Abbey as holding }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Prus Candel }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
except for \'bd hide held by }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 John filius Alani }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 for nursing the king's dogs injured in Blackmore Forest. This \'bd hide is probably the 2 \'bd
 virgates of the present entry and is the same piece of land found in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 5, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 90, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. (Edward I) no. 111, and viii. (Edward III) no. 241; see Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iv. p. 144.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 56,56\tab THE FOURTH PART OF 1 VIRGATE. This land lay in Ailwood (later Rowbarrow) Hundred according to an analysis of the Tax Returns and the odd fraction may answer to the 2 \'bd hides, less \'bc virgate, of Rollington (47,10).}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,57\tab AELFRIC [* THE HUNTER *]. See 56,57 Coombe note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab COOMBE. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Come}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
In the Tax Return for Ailwood (later Rowbarrow) Hundred, Aelfric the hunter is recorded as holding 4 hides, less 1 virgate, in lordship.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 1 VILLAGER AND 4 SMALLHOLDERS [***]. There is a gap of about eight letters' width in the manuscript after }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 bord'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
probably for the villagers' ploughs to be added. See 1,26 villagers note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,58\tab SWEIN [* OF ESSEX *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,59\tab AELFRIC [* THE HUNTER *]. See 56,6 'Winterborne' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab BOVINGTON. See 56,6 'Winterborne' note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,60\tab AELFRIC [* THE HUNTER *]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Probably Aelfric the hunter; see 56,6 Aelfric note and 56,6 'Winterborne' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab `WINTERBORNE'. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The place can be located in Bere Hundred by an analysis of the Tax Returns and could therefore be Winterborne Kingston; see 56,6 'Winterborne' note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 56,61\tab [***]. There is a gap of about 1 \'bd lines in the manuscript after this entry, no doubt left for the scribe to enter details of population, resources and value, when available.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,62\tab ALWARD [* THE REEVE *].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Probably Alward the reeve who holds 1 hide in lordship in the Tax Return for Winfrith Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab WOOL. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 57,17 Galton note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,63\tab ALMER [* THE BEADLE *].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Perhaps the beadle who is recorded in the Tax Return for Winfrith Hundred as holding 1 virgate in lordship.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab WOOL.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 24, 1 virgate in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wolle }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Hasler Hundred is recorded as held from}{\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 the Earl of Gloucester. It is odd for it to be included in Hasler Hundred, as it appears to have been in Winfrith Hundred in 1086 and later.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 56,65\tab AELFRIC [* THE HUNTER *]. See 56,52 Blackmanston note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab BLACKMANSTON. See 56,52 Blackmanston note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 57\tab LANDS OF THE KING'S SERVANTS. In the manuscript and Farley }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 SERVIENT'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 the Ordnance Survey facsimile}{\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 fails to reproduce the clear abbreviation sign over the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 T}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Dorset is unusual in placing the lands of the}{\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 king's servants after, instead of before, those of the king's thanes.}{\insrsid9113064 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab No corresponding entries in Exon survive for this chapter.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 57,1\tab WILLIAM BELLETT. A descendant of William Bellett, Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Belet}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 holds his lands in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , and in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  these same lands are found in the hands of Edmund }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Everard}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
which enables more precise identification of some places. The William of 57,3;12-14;19 appears to be or is said to be William Bellett.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab `FROME [BILLET]'.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Named from the Domesday holder or his descendants. It is now represented by Stafford House (S
Y724899) in West Stafford parish and may have included the land called 'Everard's farm'; see Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 511; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, i. p. 243. The parish lay in Cullifordtree Hundred but 'Frome Billet' itself was a tithing of St George Hundred, the successor to Dorchester Hundred, and can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Dorchester Hundred; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 195. It is held by Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Belet }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in St George Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 88; see the Red Book of the Exchequer (Hall, ii. p. 545). It is held as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Frome Belet }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 by Edmund }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Everard }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 17.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab BRICTFRITH <OF FROME>. The name Brictfrith occurs four times in Domesday Book. The Brictfrith who held almsland in Devon is unlikely to be re
lated to the other three, whose modest holdings, lacking tenurial or any other links to each other, are too widely separated to be plausibly linked. They were therefore probably held by different individuals (JP).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab HELD. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 tenuit }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 was corrected to }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 teneb' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (= }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 tenebant}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 imperfect plural) by the main scribe of Great Domesday, probably when he interlined }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 7}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Bricfrid}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 . Farley misprinted }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 tenuit}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 For a similar correction by the scribe, see 39,1 held note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 3 HIDES. LAND FOR ... . In the manuscript there is an erasure from under the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .iii. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .iii. hid' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 to the }{\i\f827\cf1\insrsid9113064 
\'e7 }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 of }{\i\f827\cf1\insrsid9113064 T'ra \'e7}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
the main scribe of Great Domesday drew a line to join up the two phrases to indicate that nothing was to be added in the gap left. Farley did not print this link-line; see also 55,8 and 55.8 meadow note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 57,2\tab HUGH [* GOSBERT *].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Probably Hugh Gosbert who holds 3 virgates in lordship in the Tax Return for Cullifordtree Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab LEWELL. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 20, the prior of St John of Jerusalem holds 1 hide in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Lywolle }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 from Hugh }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Poyntz }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
in Cullifordtree Hundred. This may well account for the 3 virgates of the present holding, plus the 1 virgate of 56,11. The holding can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Cullifordtree Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 2 SMALLHOLDERS WHO PAY 20
d. The lack of a value statement for this entry suggests that the 20d might be a rent paid by the smallholders for 'farming' the land; see 47,7 hides note and 47,7 man-at-arms note, and compare 12,13 salt-workers note, 49,13 fishermen note and 57,17 men n
ote. However, see 54,2 [value] note on other examples of no value statement, and 1,23 where a smallholder pays 30d and a value is given to the holding.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 57,3\tab WILLIAM [* BELLETT *] }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ... TWO THANES HELD IT. William is William Bellett who holds 1 hide in lor
dship in the Tax Return for Cullifordtree Hundred. This Tax Return also states that the king has not had tax from 5 virgates which 1 thane, whose land it had been, holds at a revenue from William Bellett.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab `WINTERBORNE [BELET]'.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Cullifordtree Hundred. Like 'Frome Billet' (57,1) the place is named from William }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Belet }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 or his descendant Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Belet }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 who holds a Winterborne in St George Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 88; see the Red Book of the Exch
equer (Hall, ii p. 545); }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. p. 18. 'Winterborne Belet' lies in Winterborne Came and is probably the same place as the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wynterburn Hundynton }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
[Winterborne Huntingdon], in Winterborne Came (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 263), held in 1303 from Edmund }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Everard }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 30, 49, coupled with Woodsford (57,13); see 17,1 Frampton note}{\insrsid9113064 . This 'Winterborne'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  is now probably represented by Cripton (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. pp. 261-62). Winterborne Came was in Frampton Liberty (see 17,1 Frampton note) and so perhaps was regarded as part of Dorchester (St George) Hundred, but Cripton was a tithing in Cullifordtree Hundred.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 57,4\tab WILLIAM OF DAUMERAY.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  In the manuscript a }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 ten' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('holds') has been erased, though still partially visible, after }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Will's}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 :}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 the main scribe of Great Domesday momentarily did not realize that the man had a surname. Farley did not show it.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab LAND OF THREE THANES. This unnamed land can be located in Charborough Hundred}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
according to an analysis of the Tax Returns. It may have been a part of 'Great Crawford', the 3 parts of a mill at 9s answer\-ing to a \'bc mill at 30d in 56,12 (see 56,12 'Crawford' note).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 57,5\tab HUGH GOSBERT.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 gosbert }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is interlined above }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hugo}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; Farley misprinted }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Gosbert }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 with a capital.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 1 VIRGATE OF LAND. Like the land of the previous entry (57,4), an analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in Charborough Hundred in 1086.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 57,6\tab `WINTERBORNE'. Both this 'Winterborne' and that
 of 57,10 can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Combsditch Hundred and are therefore on the eastern River Winterborne; they must therefore have been one or more of Winterborne Anderson, Winterborne Clenston, Winterborne Tomson, Winterbo
rne Muston, and possibly Winterborne Houghton; see 26,13 'Winterborne' note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 57,7\tab WORGRET. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Bere Hundred. It was later in Hasler Hundred geographically, though a tithing of Barrow Hundre
d (a later subdivision of Bere Hundred). See 49,14 Hethfelton note, 37,10 Worgret note and 11,9 Worgret note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab LAND FOR. In the manuscript an 7 is written before the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 T'ra}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
no doubt by mistake. Farley did not print it. Compare 36,10 Alward note; 56,39 land note and 57,15 woodland note .}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 57,8\tab WOOLCOMBE.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  See 56,50 Woolcombe note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 57,9\tab HERVEY THE CHAMBERLAIN. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Cubicularius }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in Domesday; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 camerarius }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in the Tax Return for
 'Alvredesberge' Hundred. He is Hervey of Wilton who is one of the king's servants in Domesday Wiltshire (WIL 68,1); see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Somerset Survey}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 i. pp. 149-50.}{
\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab WIMBORNE [ST GILES].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  This 'Wimborne' can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Alvredesberge' Hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab MILL 22 \'bd [***]. In the manuscript there is a gap of about six letters' width after }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .xxii 7}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 dim'.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 7}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064  was added later as it covers the dot at the end of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .xxii}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 It is difficult to know what should have been added here: possibly }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 sol' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('shillings') or }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 den' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ('pence'), the mill paying either 22s 6d or 22 \'bd d. The phrase }{\i\f820\cf1\insrsid9113064 in molino uill\'ea }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
is unusual with renders. The mill may be related to the third of a mill paying 15d in 55,13.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 57,10\tab JOHN [* THE USHER *]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Probably John the Usher who holds 1 hide and 1 \'bd
 virgates in lordship in the Tax Return for Combsditch Hundred. He also held land in Domesday Somerset and Wiltshire as one of the king's servants.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab `WINTERBORNE'. Domesday}{\i\insrsid9113064  Wintreburne}{\insrsid9113064 . It was left unidentified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 , iii
. p. 113 no 500, but identified as a place lying on the south River Winterborne by }{\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{\insrsid9113064 . }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
See 26,13 'Winterborne' note and 57,6 'Winterborne' note. With the places called 'Winterborne' in 26,48 and 55,12, this would have formed a 5-hide unit.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab ALWOLD. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 33,1 Alwold note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 57,11\tab WILLIAM OF DAUMERAY.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  See 55,19 William note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WALDITCH. This land can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for 'Goderthorn' Hundred.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 57,12\tab WILLIAM BELLETT. In the manuscript the interlined byname looks more like }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 belot }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 than }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 belet}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , although }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 belet }
{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is the more usual form and occurs in the interlineation in 57,19. Farley printed }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 belet}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab NUTFORD. A fee of Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Belet }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 753. See 1,28 Nutford note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 57,13\tab WOODSFORD. The land was at West Woodsford in Winfrith Hundred, held in 1285 from Edmund }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Everard}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; see}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 9. It lay in Chilbury Hundred in 1086 according to an analysis of the Tax Returns. For East Woodsford, see 11,7 Woodsford note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 57,14\tab LYME [REGIS]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 In }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 88, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Lim' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 is held by Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Belet}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;
}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see the Red Book of the Exchequer (Hall, ii. p. 545).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 57,15\tab HUNDGER SON OF ODIN.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Hundger (Domesday and the Tax Returns for Beaminster Hundred and Whitchurch Hundred: }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hungerus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 is a twelfth-century form of hypothetical Old Scandinavian }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Hundigeirr}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see Fellows-Jensen, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Scandinavian Personal Names in Lincolnshire and Yorkshire}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 144. Odin (Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Odinus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ; Tax Returns }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Audoenus}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 is Old Scandinavian }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Authunn}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see Fellows-Jensen, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Scandinavian Personal Names in Lincolnshire and Yorkshire}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 41; Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 192}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab BROADWINDSOR. Now a parish in Beaminster Hundr
ed, including the village of Little Windsor. In 1086, only 1 hide (perhaps the 1 hide 'in this village', 57,16) lay in Beaminster Hundred according to an analysis of the Tax Returns, though it paid tax in 'another hundred'. This other hundred was presumab
ly Whitchurch Hundred where the present estate must have lain, since Hundger son of Odin's 8 hides of lordship land are listed in the Tax Return for that hundred. The holding can be found in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, p. 94, where in 1212 Thomas of Windsor held }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Windesor' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ...}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  de conquestu et de dono Willelmi Bastardi }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 regis}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ] }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Anglie per seriantiam}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  ('by sergeanty, from [the] Conquest and by gift of William the bastard [king] of England'); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 54.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab BONDI [* THE CONSTABLE *]. See 51,1 Bondi note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab WOODLAND ... IN LENGTH AND 8 ... . In the manuscript an }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 7}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  occurs twice}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in error after }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 lg'}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,
}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 the second one being partially covered by the }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 v }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 of }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 viii}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Farley printed only one }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 7}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 . See 36,10 Alward note, 56,39 land note and 57,7 land note for similar cases of an }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 7 }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 which should not be there.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 57,16\tab ALSO IN THIS VILLAGE. See 57,15 Broadwindsor note. The holding may be represented by Little Windsor in Broadwindsor parish; see 57,15 Broadwindsor note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab [VALUE ***]. See 54,2 [value] note.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 57,17\tab OSMUND THE BAKER.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  The evidence of the Red Book of the Exchequer and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  (see 57,17 Galton note) suggests that in this case Osmund's byname }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 pistor }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 does describe his own occupation, rather than that of one of his ancestors.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab GALTON. From Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 gafol }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 tun }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
('farm subject to tax or rent'), perhaps referring to the render of 12s 4d by four men in 1086; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 140; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, iii. pp. 34, 114. The land was in Chilbury Hundred in 1086: in the Tax Return for this hundred Osmund the baker has 1 hide and \'bd
 virgate of lordship there, corresponding to this entry. This holding of Galton by Osmund the baker in 1086 develops into a serjeanty involving land at Wool (56,62) as well. In the Red Book of the Exchequer (Hall, ii. p. 547) Robert }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 de Welles }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 holds 2 hides in Wool and one in Galton }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 per servicium pistoris}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  ('by baker-service');}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 89, 1387 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 per serianteriam faciendi panem domini regis}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 : 'by serjeanty of making [his] lord the king's bread'); Round, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
King's Serjeants}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 232-33.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 4 MEN. Perhaps the same as the 'four free men' who held in 1066. As no 1086 value is given for the land, it may be that these men held it at a revenue ('farmed' it); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, iii. p. 12. Compare 47,7 and 47,7 hides note and 47,7 man-at-arms note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 57,18\tab WOODSTREET. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 It lay in Winfrith Hundred in 1086, where, according to the Tax Return for that hundred, Osmund the baker has 3 virgates in lordship.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 57,19\tab STOURPAINE.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Sture}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The odd hidage, 1 hide and 2 \'bd virgates, added to that of 50,4 (6 hides and 1 \'bd
 virgates) makes a round figure of 8 hides.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab EDWARD LIP. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Lipe}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  is}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 lippa}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  lippe}{
\cf1\insrsid9113064  ('lip'); see Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 320-21.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 57,20\tab THIS ENTRY and the next two (57,21-22) were added by the }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
main scribe of Great Domesday after the land of the Countess of Boulogne (DOR 58), which was also added (DOR 58 countess note). He directed them to their correct position after 57,19 with rub}{\f823\cf1\insrsid9113064 
ricated transposition signs in the shape of a upsilon (\'f8) lying on its side (not the 'hands' printed in Farley).}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab AFFLINGTON. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 See 28,6 Afflington note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 57,21\tab FOR THIS ADDED ENTRY, see 57,20 entry note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab `MOULHAM'. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 A lost place in Swanage. The name, also spelt 'Mowlem', survives in local use; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, i. p. 55. It can be identified as lying in Ailwood (later Rowbarrow) Hundred since Durand the carpenter is allotted 1 hide of lordship land, corresponding to this entry, in the Tax Return for that hundred.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 57,22\tab FOR THIS ADDED ENTRY, see 57,20 entry note}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab GODFREY SCULLION. }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Scutularius}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , pp. 268-69.}{\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab THESE [***]. The manuscript breaks off abruptly here (see 57,20 entry note), with no note for the main scribe of Great Domesday in the margin reminding him to finish the sentence, and with the rest of folio 85 blank. The Latin }
{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 has }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 could perhaps be the beginning of the phrase, common in Exon but rare in Domesday (but see WIL13,2 and compare DOR 8,1): }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Has possunt arare }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ... }{
\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 car' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 '... ploughs can plough these'), although Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 hanc}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
referring to the 1 virgate, would have been expected here.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 58\tab COUNTESS OF BOULOGNE.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  She was called Ida (see SOM 17,7) of Lorraine, second wife of Count}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Eustace. Her lands passed to the Cluniac priory of Le Wast (arrondissement Boulogne-sur-Mer, canton Desvres) in the d\'e9partement of Pas-de-Calais, France. Her holding here was a
 later addition by the main scribe of Great Domesday. One would normally expect it to have been written either with the lands of other nobles (as it was in Domesday Surrey: SUR 16) or with other female tenants-in-chief (as was the land of Countess Judith 
i
n Domesday Bedfordshire: BDF 53); moreover, as she was of higher standing than the wife of Hugh son of Grip (DOR 55), her fief should have been written first. In Exon her holding appears on folio 33a, the rest of which is blank, as also most of the preced
i
ng folio and the two succeeding ones, which end a gathering that commences with lands held by and from Queen Matilda: this may be the reason why the main scribe of Great Domesday initially overlooked the fief, if, as seems likely, he was copying from Exon
.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 58,1\tab [Exon 33a1]
\par \tab THE COUNTESS OF BOULOGNE. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 The corresponding entry in Exon has 'The wife of Count Eustace'. She is called 'The}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Countess of Boulogne' in the heading in Exon, as well as for 58,2, but plain 'countess' for 58,3.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab BOCKHAMPTON.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  Held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 88, and }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, ii. p. 17, by the Abbot of Le Wast. It lay in Dorchester Hundred in 1086 according to an analysis of the Tax Returns.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab WULFEVA [* BETESLAU *]. See 58,3 Wulveva note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 58,2\tab [Exon 33a2]
\par \tab WINTERBORNE [MONKTON].}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\insrsid9113064 Domesday }{\i\insrsid9113064 Wintreburne}{\insrsid9113064 . It was identified by }{\i\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\insrsid9113064 
, iii. p. 114 no. 514, as Winterborne Monkton, but taken to be a place lying on the eastern River Winterborne by }{\i\insrsid9113064 Domesday Gazetteer}{\insrsid9113064 .
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab \tab It was held in 1212 from Eustace }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 le Moigne }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 who holds from the Abbey of Le Wast: }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , p. 88; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , ii. pp. 19-20. It is also known as Winterborne }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wast}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
, i. p. 266; }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. p. 147. It can be identified from an analysis of the Tax Return for Cullifordtree Hundred.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab 6 HIDES. Originally written }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .v. hid' }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 in the manuscript and corrected to }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 .vi. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 by the main scribe of Great Domesday.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 

\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab WULFEVA [* BETESLAU *]. See 58,3 Wulveva note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 58,3\tab [Exon 33a1]
\par \tab SWANAGE.}{\cf1\insrsid9113064  In the Tax Return for Ailwood (later Rowbarrow) Hundred Count
 Eustace holds 1 hide and one-third virgate in lordship which must be this holding in Swanage. He was a major landholder in his own right; see Domesday Somerset, Oxfordshire, Surrey (where his wife also has a fief), Hertfordshire, Huntingdonshire, Bedford
shire, etc., but according to Ellis, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 General Introduction to Domesday Book}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 i}{\insrsid9113064 . }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
pp. 416-17, this Eustace may be Countess Ida's son, not husband. This parcel of land is said by Hutchins, }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 History of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 660, to have formed a narrow strip at the easte
rn end of Swanage called 'Eight Holds' or 'Eight Holes'; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Place-Names of Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , i. p. 60.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab LAND FOR 1 PLOUGH. 1 VILLAGER HAS IT THERE. The villager has the plough (not the whole manor, as }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 VCH Dorset}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 , iii. pp. 16, 137), which is made clear by the Exon '1 plough}{
\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 can plough it, which 1 villager has on that land'. See 3,14 woman note.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 \tab WULFEVA [* BETESLAU *]. }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Vlueua }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 represents Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064 Wulfgifu}{\cf1\insrsid9113064 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid9113064  }{
\cf1\insrsid9113064 She was probably Wulfeva Beteslau (of}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 Beslow (possibly in Shropshire); see WIL 68,24 Wulfeva note), who was dead by the time of the Domesday survey}{\insrsid9113064  }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 
(HAM 6,12) and was probably also the countess' predecessor in Somerset.}{\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid9113064 \tab SHE COULD ... WOULD. In the corresponding entries in Exon, this is only mentioned for 58,3.}{\cf1\insrsid1786625 
\par }{\insrsid9113064 
\par }}