{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman{\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f1\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604020202020204}Arial;}{\f2\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 02070309020205020404}Courier New;}{\f3\froman\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05050102010706020507}Symbol;}
{\f4\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604020202020204}Helvetica;}{\f5\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 02070409020205020404}Courier{\*\falt Courier New};}{\f6\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603040505020304}Tms Rmn;}
{\f7\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604020202030204}Helv;}{\f8\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02040503060506020304}New York;}{\f9\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}System;}
{\f10\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05000000000000000000}Wingdings;}{\f11\fmodern\fcharset128\fprq1{\*\panose 02020609040205080304}MS Mincho{\*\falt ?l?r ??\'81\'66c};}
{\f12\froman\fcharset129\fprq2{\*\panose 02030600000101010101}Batang{\*\falt \'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7EcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7E\'a2\'aeEcEcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7E\'a2\'aeEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE};}
{\f13\fnil\fcharset134\fprq2{\*\panose 02010600030101010101}SimSun{\*\falt ??????????\'a1\'a7??????};}{\f14\fnil\fcharset136\fprq2{\*\panose 02010601000101010101}PMingLiU{\*\falt !Ps2OcuAe};}
{\f15\fmodern\fcharset128\fprq1{\*\panose 020b0609070205080204}MS Gothic{\*\falt ?l?r ?S?V?b?N};}
{\f16\fmodern\fcharset129\fprq1{\*\panose 020b0600000101010101}Dotum{\*\falt \'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7EcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7E\'a2\'aeEcEcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7E\'a2\'aeEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE};}
{\f17\fmodern\fcharset134\fprq1{\*\panose 02010600030101010101}SimHei{\*\falt o??????????????????????????????};}{\f18\fmodern\fcharset136\fprq1{\*\panose 02010609000101010101}MingLiU{\*\falt 2OcuAe};}
{\f19\froman\fcharset128\fprq1{\*\panose 02020609040305080305}Mincho{\*\falt ??\'81\'66c};}
{\f20\froman\fcharset129\fprq1{\*\panose 020b0600000101010101}Gulim{\*\falt \'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7E\'a2\'aeEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7EcEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE};}
{\f21\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02040604050505020304}Century;}{\f22\froman\fcharset222\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Angsana New;}{\f23\froman\fcharset222\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0304020202020204}Cordia New;}
{\f24\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}Mangal;}{\f25\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}Latha;}{\f26\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 010a0502050306030303}Sylfaen;}
{\f27\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 01010600010101010101}Vrinda;}{\f28\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}Raavi;}{\f29\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}Shruti;}
{\f30\froman\fcharset1\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}Sendnya;}{\f31\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}Gautami;}{\f32\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}Tunga;}
{\f33\froman\fcharset1\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Estrangella Edessa;}{\f34\fswiss\fcharset128\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604020202020204}Arial Unicode MS;}{\f35\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604030504040204}Tahoma;}
{\f36\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f37\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}DejaVu Sans;}{\f38\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Marlett;}
{\f39\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Lucida Console;}{\f40\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Verdana;}{\f41\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial Black;}
{\f42\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Comic Sans MS;}{\f43\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Impact;}{\f44\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Georgia;}
{\f45\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Franklin Gothic Medium;}{\f46\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Palatino Linotype;}{\f47\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Trebuchet MS;}
{\f48\froman\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Webdings;}{\f49\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2 Estrangelo Edessa;}{\f50\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2 MV Boli;}{\f51\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Microsoft Sans Serif;}
{\f52\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Alba;}{\f53\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Alba Matter;}{\f54\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Alba Super;}
{\f55\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Baby Kruffy;}{\f56\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Chick;}{\f57\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Croobie;}
{\f58\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Fat;}{\f59\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Freshbot;}{\f60\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Frosty;}
{\f61\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}GlooGun;}{\f62\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Jenkins v2.0;}{\f63\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Jokewood;}
{\f64\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Poornut;}{\f65\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Porky's;}{\f66\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Pussycat;}
{\f67\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Weltron Urban;}{\f68\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Mistral;}{\f69\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Lucida Sans Unicode;}
{\f70\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Blackadder ITC;}{\f71\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Bradley Hand ITC;}{\f72\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Copperplate Gothic Bold;}
{\f73\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Copperplate Gothic Light;}{\f74\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Curlz MT;}{\f75\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Edwardian Script ITC;}
{\f76\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Engravers MT;}{\f77\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Eras Demi ITC;}{\f78\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Eras Light ITC;}
{\f79\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Eurostile;}{\f80\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Felix Titling;}{\f81\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Franklin Gothic Book;}
{\f82\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Franklin Gothic Demi;}{\f83\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Franklin Gothic Medium Cond;}{\f84\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}French Script MT;}
{\f85\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Century Gothic;}{\f86\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Kristen ITC;}{\f87\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Lucida Sans;}
{\f88\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Maiandra GD;}{\f89\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Matisse ITC;}{\f90\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Papyrus;}
{\f91\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Perpetua;}{\f92\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Rockwell Extra Bold;}{\f93\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Tempus Sans ITC;}
{\f94\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Vivaldi;}{\f95\froman\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Wingdings 2;}{\f96\froman\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Wingdings 3;}
{\f97\fswiss\fcharset128\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@Arial Unicode MS;}{\f98\froman\fcharset129\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@Batang;}{\f99\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Book Antiqua;}
{\f100\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Bookman Old Style;}{\f101\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Garamond;}{\f102\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Haettenschweiler;}
{\f103\fmodern\fcharset128\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS Mincho;}{\f104\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Outlook;}{\f105\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Monotype Corsiva;}
{\f106\fnil\fcharset134\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@SimSun;}{\f107\froman\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman Special G2;}{\f108\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial Narrow;}
{\f109\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial Special G2;}{\f110\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial Special G1;}{\f111\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial Narrow Special G1;}
{\f112\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial Narrow Special G2;}{\f113\froman\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman Special G1;}{\f114\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Kartika;}
{\f115\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Albertus Medium;}{\f116\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Albertus;}{\f117\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Albertus Extra Bold;}
{\f118\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}ITC Avant Garde Gothic;}{\f119\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}ITC Avant Garde Gothic Demi;}{\f120\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}ITC Bookman Light;}
{\f121\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}ITC Bookman Demi;}{\f122\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}CG Omega;}{\f123\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}CG Times;}
{\f124\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}ITC Zapf Chancery;}{\f125\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Clarendon;}{\f126\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Clarendon Condensed;}
{\f127\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Clarendon Extended;}{\f128\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Coronet;}{\f129\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}CourierPS;}
{\f130\froman\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}ITC Zapf Dingbats;}{\f131\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Helvetica Narrow;}{\f132\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Letter Gothic;}
{\f133\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Marigold;}{\f134\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}New Century Schoolbook;}{\f135\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Antique Olive;}
{\f136\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Antique Olive Compact;}{\f137\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Palatino{\*\falt Book Antiqua};}{\f138\froman\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}SymbolPS;}
{\f139\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Univers;}{\f140\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Univers Condensed;}{\f141\froman\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MT Extra;}
{\f142\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}???????????????????????????????;}{\f143\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New (W1){\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f144\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Microsoft Sans Serif (Vietnames;}{\f145\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Franklin Gothic Medium Cond Gre;}
{\f146\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Franklin Gothic Medium Cond Bal;}{\f147\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}ITC Avant Garde Gothic Demi Bal;}
{\f148\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604030504040204}MS Reference Sans Serif;}{\f149\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05000500000000000000}MS Reference Specialty;}{\f150\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05010101010101010101}Bookshelf Symbol 7;}
{\f151\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0504020104020203}Andale Mono IPA;}{\f152\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02040502050405020303}MS Reference Serif;}{\f153\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604030504040204}Verdana Ref;}
{\f154\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02040502050405020303}Georgia Ref;}{\f155\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05000000000000000000}MS Reference 1;}{\f156\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Reference 2;}
{\f157\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 02000500000000000000}RefSpecialty;}{\f158\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0506030101010103}Abadi MT Condensed;}{\f159\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0a06030101010103}Abadi MT Condensed Extra Bold;}
{\f160\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0306030101010103}Abadi MT Condensed Light;}{\f161\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0503020202020204}Agency FB;}{\f162\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04020705040a02060702}Algerian;}
{\f163\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03080602030302030203}Andy;}{\f164\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020f0704030504030204}Arial Rounded MT Bold;}{\f165\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020602080505020303}Baskerville Old Face;}
{\f166\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04030905020b02020c02}Bauhaus 93;}{\f167\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04040a05050d02020502}Beesknees ITC;}{\f168\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02050806060905020404}Bernard MT Condensed;}
{\f169\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 030202020406070a0903}Bickley Script;}{\f170\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04030b070d0b02020403}Braggadocio;}{\f171\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0903060703020204}Britannic Bold;}
{\f172\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04040905080b02020502}Broadway;}{\f173\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03060802040406070304}Brush Script MT;}{\f174\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02040603050505030304}Calisto MT;}
{\f175\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020a0402060406010301}Castellar;}{\f176\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04020404031007020602}Chiller;}{\f177\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 0208090404030b020404}Cooper Black;}
{\f178\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04020505060803040902}Edda;}{\f179\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020904090505020303}Elephant;}{\f180\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04030405020f02020502}Enviro;}
{\f181\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03060602040506080206}Fine Hand;}{\f182\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 030804020302050b0404}Freestyle Script;}{\f183\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04040504061007020d02}Gigi;}
{\f184\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0502020104020203}Gill Sans MT;}{\f185\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0506020104020203}Gill Sans MT Condensed;}{\f186\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0a02020104020203}Gill Sans Ultra Bold;}
{\f187\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020502050305020303}Goudy Old Style;}{\f188\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 0202090407030b020401}Goudy Stout;}{\f189\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04030604020f02020d02}Harlow Solid Italic;}
{\f190\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04040505050a02020702}Harrington;}{\f191\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04020605060303030202}Imprint MT Shadow;}{\f192\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 030604020304060b0204}Informal Roman;}
{\f193\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04090605060d06020702}Jokerman;}{\f194\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04040403040a02020202}Juice ITC;}{\f195\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 040307050d0c02020703}Kino MT;}
{\f196\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 030304020206070d0d06}Kunstler Script;}{\f197\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020a0a07050505020404}Wide Latin;}{\f198\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03010101010101010101}Lucida Calligraphy;}
{\f199\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03010101010101010101}Lucida Handwriting;}{\f200\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03020802060602070202}Matura MT Script Capitals;}{\f201\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02070704070505020303}Modern No. 20;}
{\f202\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 020b0609020202020204}OCRB;}{\f203\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03040902040508030806}Old English Text MT;}{\f204\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04050602080702020203}Onyx;}
{\f205\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 030303020206070c0b05}Palace Script MT;}{\f206\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03080702040402020b04}Parade;}{\f207\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03040602040708040804}Parchment;}
{\f208\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03060402040502070804}Pepita MT;}{\f209\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020502060505020804}Perpetua Titling MT;}{\f210\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0606030402050204}Placard Condensed;}
{\f211\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 040506030a0602020202}Playbill;}{\f212\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02080502050505020702}Poor Richard;}{\f213\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03060402040406080204}Pristina;}
{\f214\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03070502040507070304}Rage Italic;}{\f215\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02060603020205020403}Rockwell;}{\f216\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020a0606050403050204}Runic MT Condensed;}
{\f217\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03040602040607080904}Script MT Bold;}{\f218\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04040a07060a02020202}Snap ITC;}{\f219\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03070502030502020203}Viner Hand ITC;}
{\f220\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03050402040407070305}Vladimir Script;}{\f221\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}normal verdana;}{\f222\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}IAGB5 Symbol;}
{\f223\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0706030402020204}Franklin Gothic Demi Cond;}{\f224\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0903020102020204}Franklin Gothic Heavy;}{\f225\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02010509020102010303}OCR A Extended;}
{\f226\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03020802040602020201}American Uncial;}{\f227\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04060505051002080904}Augsburger Initials;}{\f228\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04020505020e03040504}Desdemona;}
{\f229\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03060902040502070203}Forte;}{\f230\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03080302020302020206}Gradl;}{\f231\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 01010101010101010101}Mercurius Script MT Bold;}
{\f232\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 01010601010101010101}Monotype Sorts;}{\f233\froman\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05020102010208020808}Monotype Sorts 2;}{\f234\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 040c0101020201010102}Ransom;}
{\f235\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 040409050d0802020404}Stencil;}{\f236\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04030805020b02020404}Stop;}{\f237\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020503060305020303}Bell MT;}
{\f238\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 0207040306080b030204}Californian FB;}{\f239\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 0204060206030a020304}Footlight MT Light;}{\f240\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02040502050506030303}High Tower Text;}
{\f241\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04040805050809020602}Ravie;}{\f242\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04020904020102020604}Showcard Gothic;}{\f243\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 050b0604020202020204}Bookshelf Symbol 1;}
{\f244\froman\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05050102010706020507}Bookshelf Symbol 3;}{\f245\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 050b0604020202020204}Bookshelf Symbol 4;}{\f246\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05010101010101010101}Bookshelf Symbol 5;}
{\f247\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Franklin Gothic Demi Cond CE;}{\f248\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Franklin Gothic Demi Cond Cyr;}
{\f249\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Franklin Gothic Demi Cond Greek;}{\f250\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Franklin Gothic Demi Cond Tur;}
{\f251\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Franklin Gothic Demi Cond Balti;}{\f252\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Franklin Gothic Heavy CE;}
{\f253\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Franklin Gothic Heavy Cyr;}{\f254\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Franklin Gothic Heavy Greek;}
{\f255\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Franklin Gothic Heavy Tur;}{\f256\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Franklin Gothic Heavy Baltic;}
{\f257\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Reference Sans Serif (Vietna;}{\f258\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}BR-01T;}{\f259\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}BR-05B;}
{\f260\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Brougham;}{\f261\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}BR-11U;}{\f262\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Albertville;}
{\f263\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Albertville Extrabold;}{\f264\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Antique Oakland;}{\f265\froman\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}BR Symbol;}
{\f266\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}PC Brussels Demi;}{\f267\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}PC Brussels Light;}{\f268\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Cleveland Condensed;}
{\f269\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Conneticut;}{\f270\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Guatemala Antique;}{\f271\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Helsinki;}
{\f272\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Maryland;}{\f273\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Oklahoma;}{\f274\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}PC Tennessee Roman;}
{\f275\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Tennessee Roman;}{\f276\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Utah;}{\f277\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Utah Condensed;}
{\f278\fdecor\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}W Dingbats;}{\f279\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Courier (W1);}{\f280\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02000702030000020004}Twentieth Century Poster1;}
{\f281\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04010502060101010303}Creepy;}{\f282\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020c0804040000000001}EraserDust;}{\f283\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 01010101010101010101}Figaro MT;}
{\f284\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 01010101010101010101}KidTYPEPaint;}{\f285\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03010101010101010101}Mistral AV;}{\f286\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0904020202020204}Plump MT;}
{\f287\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02000509000000000005}Space Toaster;}{\f288\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02000800000000000004}Team MT;}{\f289\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0504020203020204}News Gothic MT;}
{\f290\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04040506030f02020702}Westminster;}{\f291\fmodern\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0809000000000003}Arial Alternative;}{\f292\fmodern\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0809000000000003}Arial Alternative Symbol;}
{\f293\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0606020104020203}Tw Cen MT Condensed;}{\f294\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0803020000000004}Tw Cen MT Condensed Extra Bold;}{\f295\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 020b0509000000000004}Andale Mono;}
{\f296\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Uncial ATT;}{\f297\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Tw Cen MT Condensed Extra Bold ;}{\f298\fnil\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Uncial ATT CE;}
{\f299\fnil\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Uncial ATT Tur;}{\f300\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial (W1){\*\falt Arial};}{\f301\fnil\fcharset255\fprq3{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Roman;}
{\f302\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial (W1) CE;}{\f303\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial (W1) Cyr;}{\f304\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial (W1) Greek;}
{\f305\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial (W1) Tur;}{\f306\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial (W1) (Hebrew);}{\f307\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial (W1) (Arabic);}
{\f308\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial (W1) Baltic;}{\f309\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial (W1) (Vietnamese);}
{\f310\froman\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New (W1) CE{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f311\froman\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New (W1) Cyr{\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f312\froman\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New (W1) Greek{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f313\froman\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New (W1) Tur{\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f314\froman\fcharset177\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New (W1) (Hebrew){\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f315\froman\fcharset178\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New (W1) (Arabic){\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f316\froman\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New (W1) Baltic{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f317\froman\fcharset163\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New (W1) (Vietnamese){\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f318\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0402020202020204}AvantGarde Bk BT;}{\f319\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04030205020b02020502}BernhardFashion BT;}{\f320\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}Boink LET;}
{\f321\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02050604050505020204}BookmanITC Lt BT;}{\f322\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03060802040406070304}BrushScript BT;}{\f323\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0904040702060204}Compacta Blk BT;}
{\f324\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0508030702060204}Compacta Lt BT;}{\f325\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 0208060305030b020404}Cooper Md BT;}{\f326\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020e0605020203020404}CopprplGoth BT;}
{\f327\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 0204050203030b020204}Dauphin;}{\f328\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03060902030202020203}DomBold BT;}{\f329\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03060902030302020204}DomCasual BT;}
{\f330\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 030306020406070f0b05}English111 Presto BT;}{\f331\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03030702030607090b03}English111 Vivace BT;}{\f332\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04040805071002020d02}FlamencoD;}
{\f333\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0806020204020204}Futura XBlkCn BT;}{\f334\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0602020204020303}Futura Md BT;}{\f335\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0506020204030204}Humanst521 Cn BT;}
{\f336\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03050502040202020203}Kids;}{\f337\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020602070506020304}NewBskvll BT;}{\f338\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03030602040405080b03}Nuptial BT;}
{\f339\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Scruff LET;}{\f340\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03050502040202020b03}Technical;}{\f341\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020f0702020204020204}VAGRounded BT;}
{\f342\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03010101010101010101}VivaldiD;}{\f343\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05000000000000000000}Animals 1;}{\f344\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05000000000000000000}Animals 2;}
{\f345\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0603050302020204}Arrows2;}{\f346\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0603050302020204}Balloons;}{\f347\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0603050302020204}Buildings;}
{\f348\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0603050302020204}CommonBullets;}{\f349\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0603050302020204}Computers;}{\f350\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}DF Calligraphic Ornaments LET;}
{\f351\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}DF Diversions LET;}{\f352\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}DF Diversities LET;}{\f353\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0603050302020204}Festive;}
{\f354\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0603050302020204}Food;}{\f355\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0603050302020204}Household;}{\f356\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0603050302020204}Hygiene;}
{\f357\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05000000000000000000}Kidnap;}{\f358\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05000000000000000000}Music;}{\f359\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0603050302020204}Plants;}
{\f360\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0603050302020204}SportsFigures;}{\f361\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0603050302020204}Transportation;}{\f362\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0603050302020204}Weather;}
{\f363\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02040603050705020303}CentSchbook BT;}{\f364\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03080402030202060204}Van Dijk;}{\f365\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 040b0500000000000000}Lithograph;}
{\f366\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 01010101010101010101}Adolescence;}{\f367\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0803020204040204}AntigoniBd;}{\f368\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0406020204020204}Antigoni Light;}
{\f369\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0703020204030204}Antigoni Med;}{\f370\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0603020204030204}Antigoni;}{\f371\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020e0806020206070204}MGI Archon;}
{\f372\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020d0802060808030204}AucoinExtBol;}{\f373\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020d0602050304030204}AucoinLight;}{\f374\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0804040403020303}Banjoman Open Bold;}
{\f375\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020e0803080505070304}Bedini;}{\f376\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02000503000000000004}Bermuda Solid;}{\f377\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0900020202060204}Eurostar Black Extended;}
{\f378\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0504020202050204}Eurostar;}{\f379\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0507020202060204}Eurostar Regular Extended;}{\f380\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02000507000000000004}Falstaff Festival MT;}
{\f381\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020e0602060706020304}Gourmand;}{\f382\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0704030103070804}Metro Nouveau;}{\f383\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02000504000000000003}Orbus Multiserif;}
{\f384\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02000306050000000002}Palace Script MT Semi Bold;}{\f385\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02090502050106070304}Palladius;}{\f386\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020e0702050806020304}Peinaud;}
{\f387\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020e0302020206020904}Schindler;}{\f388\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020e0402020206020904}Schindler Small Caps;}{\f389\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03010101010101010101}Wendy Medium;}
{\f390\fscript\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 03020602050506090804}Vianta;}{\f391\fdecor\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 04040604020b02020304}LcdD;}{\f392\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020502060200020303}GiovanniITCTT;}
{\f393\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00050102010706020507}Map Symbols;}{\f394\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Eurostar Regular Extended Balti;}{\f395\fdecor\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Creepy CE;}
{\f396\fdecor\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Creepy Tur;}{\f397\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}EraserDust CE;}{\f398\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}EraserDust Tur;}
{\f399\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Tw Cen MT Condensed CE;}{\f400\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Andale Mono CE;}{\f401\fmodern\fcharset204\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Andale Mono Cyr;}
{\f402\fmodern\fcharset161\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Andale Mono Greek;}{\f403\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Andale Mono Tur;}{\f404\fmodern\fcharset186\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Andale Mono Baltic;}
{\f405\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}AvantGarde Bk BT CE;}{\f406\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}AvantGarde Bk BT Greek;}
{\f407\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}AvantGarde Bk BT Tur;}{\f408\fdecor\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}BernhardFashion BT CE;}
{\f409\fdecor\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}BernhardFashion BT Greek;}{\f410\fdecor\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}BernhardFashion BT Tur;}{\f411\fnil\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Boink LET Greek;}
{\f412\froman\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}BookmanITC Lt BT CE;}{\f413\froman\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}BookmanITC Lt BT Greek;}
{\f414\froman\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}BookmanITC Lt BT Tur;}{\f415\fscript\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}BrushScript BT CE;}{\f416\fscript\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}BrushScript BT Greek;}
{\f417\fscript\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}BrushScript BT Tur;}{\f418\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Compacta Blk BT CE;}{\f419\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Compacta Blk BT Greek;}
{\f420\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Compacta Blk BT Tur;}{\f421\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Compacta Lt BT CE;}{\f422\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Compacta Lt BT Greek;}
{\f423\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Compacta Lt BT Tur;}{\f424\froman\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Cooper Md BT CE;}{\f425\froman\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Cooper Md BT Greek;}
{\f426\froman\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Cooper Md BT Tur;}{\f427\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}CopprplGoth BT CE;}{\f428\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}CopprplGoth BT Greek;}
{\f429\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}CopprplGoth BT Tur;}{\f430\fscript\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}DomBold BT CE;}{\f431\fscript\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}DomBold BT Greek;}
{\f432\fscript\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}DomBold BT Tur;}{\f433\fscript\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}DomCasual BT CE;}{\f434\fscript\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}DomCasual BT Greek;}
{\f435\fscript\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}DomCasual BT Tur;}{\f436\fscript\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}English111 Presto BT CE;}
{\f437\fscript\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}English111 Presto BT Greek;}{\f438\fscript\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}English111 Presto BT Tur;}
{\f439\fscript\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}English111 Vivace BT CE;}{\f440\fscript\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}English111 Vivace BT Greek;}
{\f441\fscript\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}English111 Vivace BT Tur;}{\f442\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Futura XBlkCn BT CE;}
{\f443\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Futura XBlkCn BT Greek;}{\f444\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Futura XBlkCn BT Tur;}{\f445\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Futura Md BT CE;}
{\f446\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Futura Md BT Greek;}{\f447\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Futura Md BT Tur;}{\f448\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Humanst521 Cn BT CE;}
{\f449\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Humanst521 Cn BT Greek;}{\f450\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Humanst521 Cn BT Tur;}{\f451\froman\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}NewBskvll BT CE;}
{\f452\froman\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}NewBskvll BT Greek;}{\f453\froman\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}NewBskvll BT Tur;}{\f454\fscript\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Nuptial BT CE;}
{\f455\fscript\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Nuptial BT Greek;}{\f456\fscript\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Nuptial BT Tur;}{\f457\fnil\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Scruff LET Greek;}
{\f458\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}VAGRounded BT CE;}{\f459\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}VAGRounded BT Greek;}{\f460\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}VAGRounded BT Tur;}
{\f461\fscript\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}VivaldiD CE;}{\f462\fscript\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}VivaldiD Tur;}{\f463\froman\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}CentSchbook BT CE;}
{\f464\froman\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}CentSchbook BT Greek;}{\f465\froman\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}CentSchbook BT Tur;}{\f466\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}AntigoniBd CE;}
{\f467\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}AntigoniBd Greek;}{\f468\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}AntigoniBd Tur;}{\f469\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}AntigoniBd Baltic;}
{\f470\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Antigoni Light CE;}{\f471\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Antigoni Light Greek;}{\f472\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Antigoni Light Tur;}
{\f473\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Antigoni Light Baltic;}{\f474\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Antigoni Med CE;}{\f475\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Antigoni Med Greek;}
{\f476\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Antigoni Med Tur;}{\f477\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Antigoni Med Baltic;}{\f478\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Antigoni CE;}
{\f479\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Antigoni Greek;}{\f480\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Antigoni Tur;}{\f481\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Antigoni Baltic;}
{\f482\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MGI Archon CE;}{\f483\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MGI Archon Greek;}{\f484\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MGI Archon Tur;}
{\f485\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MGI Archon Baltic;}{\f486\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}AucoinExtBol CE;}{\f487\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}AucoinExtBol Greek;}
{\f488\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}AucoinExtBol Tur;}{\f489\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}AucoinExtBol Baltic;}{\f490\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}AucoinLight CE;}
{\f491\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}AucoinLight Greek;}{\f492\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}AucoinLight Tur;}{\f493\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}AucoinLight Baltic;}
{\f494\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Bedini CE;}{\f495\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Bedini Greek;}{\f496\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Bedini Tur;}
{\f497\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Bedini Baltic;}{\f498\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Eurostar Black Extended CE;}
{\f499\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Eurostar Black Extended Greek;}{\f500\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Eurostar Black Extended Tur;}
{\f501\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Eurostar Black Extended Baltic;}{\f502\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Eurostar CE;}{\f503\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Eurostar Greek;}
{\f504\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Eurostar Tur;}{\f505\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Eurostar Baltic;}{\f506\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Eurostar Regular Extended CE;}
{\f507\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Eurostar Regular Extended Greek;}{\f508\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Eurostar Regular Extended Tur;}
{\f509\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Gourmand CE;}{\f510\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Gourmand Greek;}{\f511\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Gourmand Tur;}
{\f512\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Gourmand Baltic;}{\f513\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Metro Nouveau CE;}{\f514\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Metro Nouveau Greek;}
{\f515\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Metro Nouveau Tur;}{\f516\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Metro Nouveau Baltic;}{\f517\froman\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Palladius CE;}
{\f518\froman\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Palladius Greek;}{\f519\froman\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Palladius Tur;}{\f520\froman\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Palladius Baltic;}
{\f521\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Peinaud CE;}{\f522\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Peinaud Greek;}{\f523\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Peinaud Tur;}
{\f524\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Peinaud Baltic;}{\f525\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Schindler CE;}{\f526\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Schindler Greek;}
{\f527\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Schindler Tur;}{\f528\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Schindler Baltic;}{\f529\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Schindler Small Caps CE;}
{\f530\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Schindler Small Caps Greek;}{\f531\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Schindler Small Caps Tur;}
{\f532\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Schindler Small Caps Baltic;}{\f533\fscript\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Vianta Greek;}{\f534\fdecor\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}LcdD CE;}
{\f535\fdecor\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}LcdD Tur;}{\f536\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}????????????????????????\'a8\'ac?????;}
{\f537\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}??????????????????????\'a8\'ac???????;}{\f538\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}?????????????????????????\'a1\'ec????;}
{\f539\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}??????????????????????????????\'a8;}{\f540\froman\fcharset0\fprq2 Times New Roman CYR;}{\f541\froman\fcharset0\fprq2 Times New Roman TUR;}{\f542\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2 Arial CYR;}
{\f543\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2 Arial TUR;}{\f544\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1 Courier New CYR;}{\f545\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1 Courier New TUR;}{\f546\fnil\fcharset178\fprq2{\*\panose 02010000000000000000}Traditional Arabic;}
{\f547\fnil\fcharset178\fprq2{\*\panose 02010000000000000000}Arabic Transparent;}{\f548\fnil\fcharset178\fprq2{\*\panose 02010000000000000000}Andalus;}{\f549\fnil\fcharset178\fprq2{\*\panose 02010000000000000000}Simplified Arabic;}
{\f550\fmodern\fcharset178\fprq1{\*\panose 02010009000000000000}Simplified Arabic Fixed;}{\f551\fmodern\fcharset134\fprq1{\*\panose 02010609030101010101}NSimSun;}{\f552\fmodern\fcharset134\fprq1{\*\panose 02010609030101010101}@NSimSun;}
{\f553\fnil\fcharset134\fprq2{\*\panose 02010600030101010101}@SimHei;}{\f554\froman\fcharset128\fprq2{\*\panose 02020600040205080304}MS PMincho;}{\f555\froman\fcharset128\fprq2{\*\panose 02020600040205080304}@MS PMincho;}
{\f556\fmodern\fcharset128\fprq1{\*\panose 020b0609070205080204}@MS Gothic;}{\f557\fswiss\fcharset128\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0600070205080204}MS PGothic;}{\f558\fswiss\fcharset128\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0600070205080204}@MS PGothic;}
{\f559\fswiss\fcharset128\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0600070205080204}MS UI Gothic;}{\f560\fswiss\fcharset128\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0600070205080204}@MS UI Gothic;}{\f561\froman\fcharset222\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}AngsanaUPC;}
{\f562\fswiss\fcharset222\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604020202020204}BrowalliaUPC;}{\f563\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604020202020204}Browallia New;}{\f564\fswiss\fcharset222\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0304020202020204}CordiaUPC;}
{\f565\froman\fcharset222\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}DilleniaUPC;}{\f566\froman\fcharset222\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}EucrosiaUPC;}{\f567\fswiss\fcharset222\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604020202020204}FreesiaUPC;}
{\f568\fswiss\fcharset222\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604020202020204}IrisUPC;}{\f569\froman\fcharset222\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}JasmineUPC;}{\f570\froman\fcharset222\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}KodchiangUPC;}
{\f571\fswiss\fcharset222\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604020202020204}LilyUPC;}{\f572\fswiss\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 050b0604020202020204}Typographic Ext;}{\f573\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05000000000000000000}Iconic Symbols Ext;}
{\f574\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05000000000000000000}Math Ext;}{\f575\froman\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05020603050405020304}Multinational Ext;}{\f576\froman\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05020603050405020304}Greek Symbols;}
{\f577\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}SPSS Marker Set;}{\f578\froman\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05050102010607020607}MapInfo Cartographic;}{\f579\fmodern\fcharset136\fprq1{\*\panose 02020309000000000000}@MingLiU;}
{\f580\froman\fcharset136\fprq2{\*\panose 02020300000000000000}@PMingLiU;}{\f581\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}(Use Asian text font){\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f582\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}PMingLiU Western{\*\falt !Ps2OcuAe};}{\f583\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Gothic Western{\*\falt ?l?r ?S?V?b?N};}
{\f584\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Gothic CE{\*\falt ?l?r ?S?V?b?N};}{\f585\fmodern\fcharset204\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Gothic Cyr{\*\falt ?l?r ?S?V?b?N};}
{\f586\fmodern\fcharset161\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Gothic Greek{\*\falt ?l?r ?S?V?b?N};}{\f587\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Gothic Tur{\*\falt ?l?r ?S?V?b?N};}
{\f588\fmodern\fcharset186\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Gothic Baltic{\*\falt ?l?r ?S?V?b?N};}{\f589\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MingLiU Western{\*\falt 2OcuAe};}
{\f590\froman\fcharset163\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman CYR (Vietnamese;}{\f591\froman\fcharset0\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}{\f592\froman\fcharset163\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman Greek (Vietname;}
{\f593\froman\fcharset163\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman TUR (Vietnamese;}{\f594\froman\fcharset0\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}{\f595\froman\fcharset163\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times New Roman Baltic (Vietnam;}
{\f596\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}NSimSun Western;}{\f597\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@NSimSun Western;}{\f598\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS PMincho Western;}
{\f599\froman\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS PMincho CE;}{\f600\froman\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS PMincho Cyr;}{\f601\froman\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS PMincho Greek;}
{\f602\froman\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS PMincho Tur;}{\f603\froman\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS PMincho Baltic;}{\f604\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS PMincho Western;}
{\f605\froman\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS PMincho CE;}{\f606\froman\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS PMincho Cyr;}{\f607\froman\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS PMincho Greek;}
{\f608\froman\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS PMincho Tur;}{\f609\froman\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS PMincho Baltic;}{\f610\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS Gothic Western;}
{\f611\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS Gothic CE;}{\f612\fmodern\fcharset204\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS Gothic Cyr;}{\f613\fmodern\fcharset161\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS Gothic Greek;}
{\f614\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS Gothic Tur;}{\f615\fmodern\fcharset186\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS Gothic Baltic;}{\f616\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS PGothic Western;}
{\f617\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS PGothic CE;}{\f618\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS PGothic Cyr;}{\f619\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS PGothic Greek;}
{\f620\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS PGothic Tur;}{\f621\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS PGothic Baltic;}{\f622\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS PGothic Western;}
{\f623\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS PGothic CE;}{\f624\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS PGothic Cyr;}{\f625\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS PGothic Greek;}
{\f626\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS PGothic Tur;}{\f627\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS PGothic Baltic;}{\f628\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS UI Gothic Western;}
{\f629\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS UI Gothic CE;}{\f630\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS UI Gothic Cyr;}{\f631\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS UI Gothic Greek;}
{\f632\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS UI Gothic Tur;}{\f633\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS UI Gothic Baltic;}{\f634\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS UI Gothic Western;}
{\f635\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS UI Gothic CE;}{\f636\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS UI Gothic Cyr;}{\f637\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS UI Gothic Greek;}
{\f638\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS UI Gothic Tur;}{\f639\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MS UI Gothic Baltic;}{\f640\fswiss\fcharset222\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Browallia New (Thai);}
{\f641\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@MingLiU Western;}{\f642\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@PMingLiU Western;}
{\f643\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}????????????????????\'a1\'a7?????????;}{\f644\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Sans Serif{\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f645\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0502040204020203}Segoe Media Center;}{\f646\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0702040200020203}Segoe Media Center Semibold;}{\f647\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0804030504040204}Tahoma Small Cap;}
{\f648\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Elite{\*\falt Arial};}{\f649\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}GothicPS{\*\falt Arial};}
{\f650\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}????????????\'a1\'a7???????;}{\f651\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}??????????????????\'a8\'ac?????????;}
{\f652\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}????????????????????????\'a1\'a7?????;}{\f653\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}??????????????????????\'a1\'a7???????;}
{\f654\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}CG Times (W1){\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f655\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}CG Times 12pt;}
{\f656\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}????????????????????\'a8\'ac?????????;}{\f657\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}?????\'a1\'ec???;}
{\f658\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}????\'a1\'a7???;}{\f659\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Prestige;}{\f660\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}?????????????????\'a1\'ec?????????;}
{\f661\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}??????????????????\'a1\'a7??????????;}{\f662\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}o{\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f663\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}ome{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f664\fnil\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Times Roman{\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f665\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Plain text{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f666\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}boscombe{\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f667\froman\fcharset0\fprq0{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}??????????????????????????\'a8\'ac???;}{\f668\froman\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Rockwell CE;}
{\f669\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Reference Sans Serif CE;}{\f670\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Reference Sans Serif Cyr;}
{\f671\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Reference Sans Serif Greek;}{\f672\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Reference Sans Serif Tur;}
{\f673\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Reference Sans Serif Baltic;}{\f674\froman\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Reference Serif CE;}
{\f675\froman\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Reference Serif Cyr;}{\f676\froman\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Reference Serif Greek;}
{\f677\froman\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Reference Serif Tur;}{\f678\froman\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Reference Serif Baltic;}
{\f679\froman\fcharset163\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}MS Reference Serif (Vietnamese);}{\f680\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Verdana Ref CE;}{\f681\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Verdana Ref Cyr;}
{\f682\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Verdana Ref Greek;}{\f683\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Verdana Ref Tur;}{\f684\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Verdana Ref Baltic;}
{\f685\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Verdana Ref (Vietnamese);}{\f686\froman\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Georgia Ref CE;}{\f687\froman\fcharset204\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Georgia Ref Cyr;}
{\f688\froman\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Georgia Ref Greek;}{\f689\froman\fcharset162\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Georgia Ref Tur;}{\f690\froman\fcharset186\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Georgia Ref Baltic;}
{\f691\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Gill Sans MT CE;}{\f692\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Gill Sans MT Condensed CE;}
{\f693\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Gill Sans Ultra Bold CE;}{\f694\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000400000000000000}Sydnie;}{\f695\fnil\fcharset161\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Sydnie Greek;}
{\f696\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2 Arial Baltic;}{\f697\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1 Courier New Baltic;}{\f698\froman\fcharset0\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;}{\f699\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2 Arial CE;}{\f700\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2 Arial Greek;}
{\f701\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1 Courier New CE;}{\f702\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1 Courier New Greek;}{\f703\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f704\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr{\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f706\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f707\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f708\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew){\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f709\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic){\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f710\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f711\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese){\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f713\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Arial CE;}{\f714\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Arial Cyr;}{\f716\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Arial Greek;}{\f717\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Arial Tur;}{\f718\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2 Arial (Hebrew);}
{\f719\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2 Arial (Arabic);}{\f720\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Arial Baltic;}{\f721\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2 Arial (Vietnamese);}{\f723\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1 Courier New CE;}{\f724\fmodern\fcharset204\fprq1 Courier New Cyr;}
{\f726\fmodern\fcharset161\fprq1 Courier New Greek;}{\f727\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1 Courier New Tur;}{\f728\fmodern\fcharset177\fprq1 Courier New (Hebrew);}{\f729\fmodern\fcharset178\fprq1 Courier New (Arabic);}
{\f730\fmodern\fcharset186\fprq1 Courier New Baltic;}{\f731\fmodern\fcharset163\fprq1 Courier New (Vietnamese);}{\f743\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Helvetica CE;}{\f744\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Helvetica Cyr;}{\f746\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Helvetica Greek;}
{\f747\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Helvetica Tur;}{\f748\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2 Helvetica (Hebrew);}{\f749\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2 Helvetica (Arabic);}{\f750\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Helvetica Baltic;}
{\f751\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2 Helvetica (Vietnamese);}{\f815\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1 MS Mincho Western{\*\falt ?l?r ??\'81\'66c};}{\f813\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1 MS Mincho CE{\*\falt ?l?r ??\'81\'66c};}
{\f814\fmodern\fcharset204\fprq1 MS Mincho Cyr{\*\falt ?l?r ??\'81\'66c};}{\f816\fmodern\fcharset161\fprq1 MS Mincho Greek{\*\falt ?l?r ??\'81\'66c};}{\f817\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1 MS Mincho Tur{\*\falt ?l?r ??\'81\'66c};}
{\f820\fmodern\fcharset186\fprq1 MS Mincho Baltic{\*\falt ?l?r ??\'81\'66c};}{\f825\froman\fcharset0\fprq2 Batang Western{\*\falt \'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7EcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7E\'a2\'aeEcEcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7E\'a2\'aeEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE};}
{\f823\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Batang CE{\*\falt \'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7EcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7E\'a2\'aeEcEcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7E\'a2\'aeEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE};}
{\f824\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Batang Cyr{\*\falt \'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7EcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7E\'a2\'aeEcEcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7E\'a2\'aeEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE};}
{\f826\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Batang Greek{\*\falt \'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7EcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7E\'a2\'aeEcEcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7E\'a2\'aeEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE};}
{\f827\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Batang Tur{\*\falt \'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7EcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7E\'a2\'aeEcEcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7E\'a2\'aeEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE};}
{\f830\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Batang Baltic{\*\falt \'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7EcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7E\'a2\'aeEcEcE\'a1\'cb\'a2\'e7E\'a2\'aeEcE\'a2\'aeE\'a1\'cbcE};}{\f835\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2 SimSun Western{\*\falt ??????????\'a1\'a7??????};}
{\f913\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Century CE;}{\f914\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Century Cyr;}{\f916\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Century Greek;}{\f917\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Century Tur;}{\f920\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Century Baltic;}
{\f925\froman\fcharset0\fprq2 Angsana New;}{\f935\froman\fcharset0\fprq2 Cordia New;}{\f963\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Sylfaen CE;}{\f964\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Sylfaen Cyr;}{\f966\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Sylfaen Greek;}
{\f967\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Sylfaen Tur;}{\f970\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Sylfaen Baltic;}{\f1045\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2 Arial Unicode MS Western;}{\f1043\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Arial Unicode MS CE;}
{\f1044\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Arial Unicode MS Cyr;}{\f1046\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Arial Unicode MS Greek;}{\f1047\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Arial Unicode MS Tur;}{\f1048\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2 Arial Unicode MS (Hebrew);}
{\f1049\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2 Arial Unicode MS (Arabic);}{\f1050\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Arial Unicode MS Baltic;}{\f1051\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2 Arial Unicode MS (Vietnamese);}{\f1052\fswiss\fcharset222\fprq2 Arial Unicode MS (Thai);}
{\f1053\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Tahoma CE;}{\f1054\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Tahoma Cyr;}{\f1056\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Tahoma Greek;}{\f1057\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Tahoma Tur;}{\f1058\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2 Tahoma (Hebrew);}
{\f1059\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2 Tahoma (Arabic);}{\f1060\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Tahoma Baltic;}{\f1061\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2 Tahoma (Vietnamese);}{\f1062\fswiss\fcharset222\fprq2 Tahoma (Thai);}
{\f1063\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times CE{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f1064\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times Cyr{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f1066\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times Greek{\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f1067\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times Tur{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f1068\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times (Hebrew){\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f1069\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times (Arabic){\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f1070\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times Baltic{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f1071\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times (Vietnamese){\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f1093\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1 Lucida Console CE;}
{\f1094\fmodern\fcharset204\fprq1 Lucida Console Cyr;}{\f1096\fmodern\fcharset161\fprq1 Lucida Console Greek;}{\f1097\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1 Lucida Console Tur;}{\f1103\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Verdana CE;}{\f1104\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Verdana Cyr;}
{\f1106\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Verdana Greek;}{\f1107\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Verdana Tur;}{\f1110\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Verdana Baltic;}{\f1111\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2 Verdana (Vietnamese);}{\f1113\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Arial Black CE;}
{\f1114\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Arial Black Cyr;}{\f1116\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Arial Black Greek;}{\f1117\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Arial Black Tur;}{\f1120\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Arial Black Baltic;}
{\f1123\fscript\fcharset238\fprq2 Comic Sans MS CE;}{\f1124\fscript\fcharset204\fprq2 Comic Sans MS Cyr;}{\f1126\fscript\fcharset161\fprq2 Comic Sans MS Greek;}{\f1127\fscript\fcharset162\fprq2 Comic Sans MS Tur;}
{\f1130\fscript\fcharset186\fprq2 Comic Sans MS Baltic;}{\f1133\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Impact CE;}{\f1134\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Impact Cyr;}{\f1136\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Impact Greek;}{\f1137\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Impact Tur;}
{\f1140\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Impact Baltic;}{\f1143\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Georgia CE;}{\f1144\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Georgia Cyr;}{\f1146\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Georgia Greek;}{\f1147\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Georgia Tur;}
{\f1150\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Georgia Baltic;}{\f1153\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Medium CE;}{\f1154\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Medium Cyr;}{\f1156\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Medium Greek;}
{\f1157\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Medium Tur;}{\f1160\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Medium Baltic;}{\f1163\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Palatino Linotype CE;}{\f1164\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Palatino Linotype Cyr;}
{\f1166\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Palatino Linotype Greek;}{\f1167\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Palatino Linotype Tur;}{\f1170\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Palatino Linotype Baltic;}{\f1171\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Palatino Linotype (Vietnamese);}
{\f1173\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Trebuchet MS CE;}{\f1174\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Trebuchet MS Cyr;}{\f1176\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Trebuchet MS Greek;}{\f1177\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Trebuchet MS Tur;}
{\f1180\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Trebuchet MS Baltic;}{\f1213\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Microsoft Sans Serif CE;}{\f1214\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Microsoft Sans Serif Cyr;}{\f1216\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Microsoft Sans Serif Greek;}
{\f1217\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Microsoft Sans Serif Tur;}{\f1218\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2 Microsoft Sans Serif (Hebrew);}{\f1219\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2 Microsoft Sans Serif (Arabic);}{\f1220\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Microsoft Sans Serif Baltic;}
{\f1221\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2 Microsoft Sans Serif (Vietnamese);}{\f1222\fswiss\fcharset222\fprq2 Microsoft Sans Serif (Thai);}{\f1226\fnil\fcharset161\fprq2 Alba Greek;}{\f1236\fnil\fcharset161\fprq2 Alba Matter Greek;}
{\f1246\fnil\fcharset161\fprq2 Alba Super Greek;}{\f1256\fnil\fcharset161\fprq2 Baby Kruffy Greek;}{\f1266\fnil\fcharset161\fprq2 Chick Greek;}{\f1276\fnil\fcharset161\fprq2 Croobie Greek;}{\f1296\fnil\fcharset161\fprq2 Freshbot Greek;}
{\f1306\fnil\fcharset161\fprq2 Frosty Greek;}{\f1316\fnil\fcharset161\fprq2 GlooGun Greek;}{\f1326\fnil\fcharset161\fprq2 Jenkins v2.0 Greek;}{\f1366\fnil\fcharset161\fprq2 Pussycat Greek;}{\f1376\fnil\fcharset161\fprq2 Weltron Urban Greek;}
{\f1383\fscript\fcharset238\fprq2 Mistral CE;}{\f1384\fscript\fcharset204\fprq2 Mistral Cyr;}{\f1386\fscript\fcharset161\fprq2 Mistral Greek;}{\f1387\fscript\fcharset162\fprq2 Mistral Tur;}{\f1390\fscript\fcharset186\fprq2 Mistral Baltic;}
{\f1393\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Lucida Sans Unicode CE;}{\f1394\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Lucida Sans Unicode Cyr;}{\f1396\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Lucida Sans Unicode Greek;}{\f1397\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Lucida Sans Unicode Tur;}
{\f1398\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2 Lucida Sans Unicode (Hebrew);}{\f1513\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Book CE;}{\f1514\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Book Cyr;}{\f1516\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Book Greek;}
{\f1517\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Book Tur;}{\f1520\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Book Baltic;}{\f1523\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Demi CE;}{\f1524\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Demi Cyr;}
{\f1526\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Demi Greek;}{\f1527\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Demi Tur;}{\f1530\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Demi Baltic;}{\f1533\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Medium Cond CE;}
{\f1534\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Medium Cond Cyr;}{\f1536\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Medium Cond Greek;}{\f1537\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Medium Cond Tur;}
{\f1540\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Franklin Gothic Medium Cond Baltic;}{\f1553\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Century Gothic CE;}{\f1554\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Century Gothic Cyr;}{\f1556\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Century Gothic Greek;}
{\f1557\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Century Gothic Tur;}{\f1560\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Century Gothic Baltic;}{\f1675\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2 @Arial Unicode MS Western;}{\f1673\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 @Arial Unicode MS CE;}
{\f1674\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 @Arial Unicode MS Cyr;}{\f1676\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 @Arial Unicode MS Greek;}{\f1677\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 @Arial Unicode MS Tur;}{\f1678\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2 @Arial Unicode MS (Hebrew);}
{\f1679\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2 @Arial Unicode MS (Arabic);}{\f1680\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 @Arial Unicode MS Baltic;}{\f1681\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2 @Arial Unicode MS (Vietnamese);}{\f1682\fswiss\fcharset222\fprq2 @Arial Unicode MS (Thai);}
{\f1685\froman\fcharset0\fprq2 @Batang Western;}{\f1683\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 @Batang CE;}{\f1684\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 @Batang Cyr;}{\f1686\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 @Batang Greek;}{\f1687\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 @Batang Tur;}
{\f1690\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 @Batang Baltic;}{\f1693\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Book Antiqua CE;}{\f1694\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Book Antiqua Cyr;}{\f1696\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Book Antiqua Greek;}{\f1697\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Book Antiqua Tur;}
{\f1700\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Book Antiqua Baltic;}{\f1703\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Bookman Old Style CE;}{\f1704\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Bookman Old Style Cyr;}{\f1706\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Bookman Old Style Greek;}
{\f1707\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Bookman Old Style Tur;}{\f1710\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Bookman Old Style Baltic;}{\f1713\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Garamond CE;}{\f1714\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Garamond Cyr;}
{\f1716\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Garamond Greek;}{\f1717\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Garamond Tur;}{\f1720\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Garamond Baltic;}{\f1723\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Haettenschweiler CE;}{\f1724\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Haettenschweiler Cyr;}
{\f1726\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Haettenschweiler Greek;}{\f1727\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Haettenschweiler Tur;}{\f1730\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Haettenschweiler Baltic;}{\f1735\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1 @MS Mincho Western;}
{\f1733\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1 @MS Mincho CE;}{\f1734\fmodern\fcharset204\fprq1 @MS Mincho Cyr;}{\f1736\fmodern\fcharset161\fprq1 @MS Mincho Greek;}{\f1737\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1 @MS Mincho Tur;}{\f1740\fmodern\fcharset186\fprq1 @MS Mincho Baltic;}
{\f1753\fscript\fcharset238\fprq2 Monotype Corsiva CE;}{\f1754\fscript\fcharset204\fprq2 Monotype Corsiva Cyr;}{\f1756\fscript\fcharset161\fprq2 Monotype Corsiva Greek;}{\f1757\fscript\fcharset162\fprq2 Monotype Corsiva Tur;}
{\f1760\fscript\fcharset186\fprq2 Monotype Corsiva Baltic;}{\f1765\fnil\fcharset0\fprq2 @SimSun Western;}{\f1783\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Arial Narrow CE;}{\f1784\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Arial Narrow Cyr;}
{\f1786\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Arial Narrow Greek;}{\f1787\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Arial Narrow Tur;}{\f1790\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Arial Narrow Baltic;}{\f1853\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Albertus Medium CE;}
{\f1857\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Albertus Medium Tur;}{\f1860\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Albertus Medium Baltic;}{\f1863\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Albertus CE;}{\f1867\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Albertus Tur;}{\f1870\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Albertus Baltic;}
{\f1873\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Albertus Extra Bold CE;}{\f1877\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Albertus Extra Bold Tur;}{\f1880\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Albertus Extra Bold Baltic;}{\f1883\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 ITC Avant Garde Gothic CE;}
{\f1887\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 ITC Avant Garde Gothic Tur;}{\f1890\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 ITC Avant Garde Gothic Baltic;}{\f1893\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 ITC Avant Garde Gothic Demi CE;}
{\f1897\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 ITC Avant Garde Gothic Demi Tur;}{\f1900\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 ITC Avant Garde Gothic Demi Baltic;}{\f1903\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 ITC Bookman Light CE;}{\f1907\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 ITC Bookman Light Tur;}
{\f1910\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 ITC Bookman Light Baltic;}{\f1913\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 ITC Bookman Demi CE;}{\f1917\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 ITC Bookman Demi Tur;}{\f1920\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 ITC Bookman Demi Baltic;}
{\f1923\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 CG Omega CE;}{\f1927\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 CG Omega Tur;}{\f1930\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 CG Omega Baltic;}{\f1933\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 CG Times CE;}{\f1937\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 CG Times Tur;}
{\f1940\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 CG Times Baltic;}{\f1943\fscript\fcharset238\fprq2 ITC Zapf Chancery CE;}{\f1947\fscript\fcharset162\fprq2 ITC Zapf Chancery Tur;}{\f1950\fscript\fcharset186\fprq2 ITC Zapf Chancery Baltic;}
{\f1953\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Clarendon CE;}{\f1957\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Clarendon Tur;}{\f1960\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Clarendon Baltic;}{\f1963\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Clarendon Condensed CE;}
{\f1967\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Clarendon Condensed Tur;}{\f1970\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Clarendon Condensed Baltic;}{\f1973\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Clarendon Extended CE;}{\f1977\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Clarendon Extended Tur;}
{\f1980\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Clarendon Extended Baltic;}{\f1983\fscript\fcharset238\fprq2 Coronet CE;}{\f1987\fscript\fcharset162\fprq2 Coronet Tur;}{\f1990\fscript\fcharset186\fprq2 Coronet Baltic;}{\f1993\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1 CourierPS CE;}
{\f1997\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1 CourierPS Tur;}{\f2000\fmodern\fcharset186\fprq1 CourierPS Baltic;}{\f2013\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Helvetica Narrow CE;}{\f2017\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Helvetica Narrow Tur;}
{\f2020\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Helvetica Narrow Baltic;}{\f2023\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1 Letter Gothic CE;}{\f2027\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1 Letter Gothic Tur;}{\f2030\fmodern\fcharset186\fprq1 Letter Gothic Baltic;}
{\f2033\fscript\fcharset238\fprq2 Marigold CE;}{\f2037\fscript\fcharset162\fprq2 Marigold Tur;}{\f2040\fscript\fcharset186\fprq2 Marigold Baltic;}{\f2043\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 New Century Schoolbook CE;}
{\f2047\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 New Century Schoolbook Tur;}{\f2050\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 New Century Schoolbook Baltic;}{\f2053\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Antique Olive CE;}{\f2057\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Antique Olive Tur;}
{\f2060\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Antique Olive Baltic;}{\f2063\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Antique Olive Compact CE;}{\f2067\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Antique Olive Compact Tur;}{\f2070\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Antique Olive Compact Baltic;}
{\f2073\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Palatino CE{\*\falt Book Antiqua};}{\f2077\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Palatino Tur{\*\falt Book Antiqua};}{\f2080\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Palatino Baltic{\*\falt Book Antiqua};}{\f2093\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Univers CE;}
{\f2097\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Univers Tur;}{\f2100\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Univers Baltic;}{\f2103\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Univers Condensed CE;}{\f2107\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Univers Condensed Tur;}
{\f2110\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Univers Condensed Baltic;}{\f6103\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CYR CE;}{\f6104\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman CYR Cyr;}{\f6106\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman CYR Greek;}
{\f6107\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman CYR Tur;}{\f6108\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman CYR (Hebrew);}{\f6109\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman CYR (Arabic);}{\f6110\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman CYR Baltic;}
{\f6111\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman CYR (Vietnamese);}{\f6113\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman TUR CE;}{\f6114\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman TUR Cyr;}{\f6116\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman TUR Greek;}
{\f6117\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman TUR Tur;}{\f6118\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman TUR (Hebrew);}{\f6119\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman TUR (Arabic);}{\f6120\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman TUR Baltic;}
{\f6121\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman TUR (Vietnamese);}{\f6123\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Arial CYR CE;}{\f6124\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Arial CYR Cyr;}{\f6126\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Arial CYR Greek;}
{\f6127\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Arial CYR Tur;}{\f6128\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2 Arial CYR (Hebrew);}{\f6129\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2 Arial CYR (Arabic);}{\f6130\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Arial CYR Baltic;}
{\f6131\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2 Arial CYR (Vietnamese);}{\f6133\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Arial TUR CE;}{\f6134\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Arial TUR Cyr;}{\f6136\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Arial TUR Greek;}{\f6137\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Arial TUR Tur;}
{\f6138\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2 Arial TUR (Hebrew);}{\f6139\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2 Arial TUR (Arabic);}{\f6140\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Arial TUR Baltic;}{\f6141\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2 Arial TUR (Vietnamese);}
{\f6143\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1 Courier New CYR CE;}{\f6144\fmodern\fcharset204\fprq1 Courier New CYR Cyr;}{\f6146\fmodern\fcharset161\fprq1 Courier New CYR Greek;}{\f6147\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1 Courier New CYR Tur;}
{\f6148\fmodern\fcharset177\fprq1 Courier New CYR (Hebrew);}{\f6149\fmodern\fcharset178\fprq1 Courier New CYR (Arabic);}{\f6150\fmodern\fcharset186\fprq1 Courier New CYR Baltic;}{\f6151\fmodern\fcharset163\fprq1 Courier New CYR (Vietnamese);}
{\f6153\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1 Courier New TUR CE;}{\f6154\fmodern\fcharset204\fprq1 Courier New TUR Cyr;}{\f6156\fmodern\fcharset161\fprq1 Courier New TUR Greek;}{\f6157\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1 Courier New TUR Tur;}
{\f6158\fmodern\fcharset177\fprq1 Courier New TUR (Hebrew);}{\f6159\fmodern\fcharset178\fprq1 Courier New TUR (Arabic);}{\f6160\fmodern\fcharset186\fprq1 Courier New TUR Baltic;}{\f6161\fmodern\fcharset163\fprq1 Courier New TUR (Vietnamese);}
{\f6613\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek CE;}{\f6614\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek Cyr;}{\f6616\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek Greek;}{\f6617\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek Tur;}
{\f6618\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek (Hebrew);}{\f6619\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek (Arabic);}{\f6620\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek Baltic;}
{\f6621\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek (Vietnamese);}{\f6643\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic CE;}{\f6644\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic Cyr;}{\f6646\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic Greek;}
{\f6647\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic Tur;}{\f6648\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic (Hebrew);}{\f6649\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic (Arabic);}
{\f6650\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic Baltic;}{\f6651\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic (Vietnamese);}{\f7663\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Arial Baltic CE;}{\f7664\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Arial Baltic Cyr;}
{\f7666\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Arial Baltic Greek;}{\f7667\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Arial Baltic Tur;}{\f7668\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2 Arial Baltic (Hebrew);}{\f7669\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2 Arial Baltic (Arabic);}
{\f7670\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Arial Baltic Baltic;}{\f7671\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2 Arial Baltic (Vietnamese);}{\f7673\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1 Courier New Baltic CE;}{\f7674\fmodern\fcharset204\fprq1 Courier New Baltic Cyr;}
{\f7676\fmodern\fcharset161\fprq1 Courier New Baltic Greek;}{\f7677\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1 Courier New Baltic Tur;}{\f7678\fmodern\fcharset177\fprq1 Courier New Baltic (Hebrew);}{\f7679\fmodern\fcharset178\fprq1 Courier New Baltic (Arabic);}
{\f7680\fmodern\fcharset186\fprq1 Courier New Baltic Baltic;}{\f7681\fmodern\fcharset163\fprq1 Courier New Baltic (Vietnamese);}{\f7683\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE CE;}{\f7684\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman CE Cyr;}
{\f7686\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman CE Greek;}{\f7687\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman CE Tur;}{\f7688\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman CE (Hebrew);}{\f7689\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman CE (Arabic);}
{\f7690\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman CE Baltic;}{\f7691\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman CE (Vietnamese);}{\f7693\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Arial CE CE;}{\f7694\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Arial CE Cyr;}
{\f7696\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Arial CE Greek;}{\f7697\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Arial CE Tur;}{\f7698\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2 Arial CE (Hebrew);}{\f7699\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2 Arial CE (Arabic);}{\f7700\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Arial CE Baltic;}
{\f7701\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2 Arial CE (Vietnamese);}{\f7703\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Arial Greek CE;}{\f7704\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Arial Greek Cyr;}{\f7706\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Arial Greek Greek;}
{\f7707\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Arial Greek Tur;}{\f7708\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2 Arial Greek (Hebrew);}{\f7709\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2 Arial Greek (Arabic);}{\f7710\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Arial Greek Baltic;}
{\f7711\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2 Arial Greek (Vietnamese);}{\f7713\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1 Courier New CE CE;}{\f7714\fmodern\fcharset204\fprq1 Courier New CE Cyr;}{\f7716\fmodern\fcharset161\fprq1 Courier New CE Greek;}
{\f7717\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1 Courier New CE Tur;}{\f7718\fmodern\fcharset177\fprq1 Courier New CE (Hebrew);}{\f7719\fmodern\fcharset178\fprq1 Courier New CE (Arabic);}{\f7720\fmodern\fcharset186\fprq1 Courier New CE Baltic;}
{\f7721\fmodern\fcharset163\fprq1 Courier New CE (Vietnamese);}{\f7723\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1 Courier New Greek CE;}{\f7724\fmodern\fcharset204\fprq1 Courier New Greek Cyr;}{\f7726\fmodern\fcharset161\fprq1 Courier New Greek Greek;}
{\f7727\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1 Courier New Greek Tur;}{\f7728\fmodern\fcharset177\fprq1 Courier New Greek (Hebrew);}{\f7729\fmodern\fcharset178\fprq1 Courier New Greek (Arabic);}{\f7730\fmodern\fcharset186\fprq1 Courier New Greek Baltic;}
{\f7731\fmodern\fcharset163\fprq1 Courier New Greek (Vietnamese);}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255;\red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;
\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0;\red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 \snext0 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph Font;}{\*
\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv 
\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{\s15\ql \li0\ri0\sb240\sa120\keepn\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 
\f4\fs28\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 \sbasedon0 \snext16 Heading;}{\s16\ql \li0\ri0\sa120\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 \sbasedon0 \snext16 Body Text;}{
\s17\ql \li0\ri0\sa120\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f36\fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 \sbasedon16 \snext17 List;}{\s18\ql \li0\ri0\sb120\sa120\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 
\i\f36\fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 \sbasedon0 \snext18 \ssemihidden caption;}{\s19\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f36\fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 \sbasedon0 \snext19 Index;}{
\s20\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f35\fs16\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 \sbasedon0 \snext20 \ssemihidden Balloon Text;}{\s21\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1134\nooverflow\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 
\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext21 Plain Text;}{\s22\ql \fi-1134\li1134\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1134\tx1418\tx9781\nooverflow\faauto\rin0\lin1134\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 
\sbasedon0 \snext22 dday;}{\*\cs23 \additive RTF_Num 2 1;}{\*\cs24 \additive RTF_Num 3 1;}{\*\cs25 \additive RTF_Num 4 1;}{\*\cs26 \additive RTF_Num 5 1;}{\*\cs27 \additive RTF_Num 6 1;}{\*\cs28 \additive RTF_Num 7 1;}{\*\cs29 \additive RTF_Num 8 1;}{\*
\cs30 \additive RTF_Num 9 1;}{\*\cs31 \additive RTF_Num 10 1;}{\*\cs32 \additive RTF_Num 11 1;}{\*\cs33 \additive RTF_Num 12 1;}{\*\cs34 \additive RTF_Num 13 1;}{\*\cs35 \additive RTF_Num 14 1;}{\*\cs36 \additive RTF_Num 15 1;}{\*\cs37 \additive 
RTF_Num 16 1;}{\*\cs38 \additive RTF_Num 17 1;}{\*\cs39 \additive RTF_Num 18 1;}{\*\cs40 \additive RTF_Num 19 1;}{\*\cs41 \additive RTF_Num 20 1;}{\*\cs42 \additive RTF_Num 21 1;}{\*\cs43 \additive RTF_Num 22 1;}{\*\cs44 \additive RTF_Num 23 1;}{\*\cs45 
\additive RTF_Num 24 1;}{\*\cs46 \additive RTF_Num 25 1;}{\*\cs47 \additive RTF_Num 26 1;}{\*\cs48 \additive RTF_Num 27 1;}{\*\cs49 \additive RTF_Num 28 1;}{\*\cs50 \additive RTF_Num 29 1;}{\*\cs51 \additive RTF_Num 30 1;}{\*\cs52 \additive RTF_Num 31 1;}
{\*\cs53 \additive RTF_Num 32 1;}{\*\cs54 \additive RTF_Num 33 1;}{\*\cs55 \additive RTF_Num 34 1;}{\*\cs56 \additive RTF_Num 35 1;}{\*\cs57 \additive \b \sbasedon10 Strong Emphasis;}}{\*\revtbl {Unknown;}}{\*\pgptbl {\pgp\ipgp0\itap0\li0\ri0\sb0\sa0}}
{\*\rsidtbl \rsid4139880\rsid4356906\rsid5400429\rsid8798677\rsid14225564}{\*\generator Microsoft Word 10.0.6612;}{\info{\author matt}{\operator John Palmer}{\creatim\yr2007\mo7\dy21\hr20\min53}{\revtim\yr2007\mo7\dy31\hr15\min23}{\printim\yr2113\mo1\dy1}
{\version6}{\edmins7}{\nofpages292}{\nofwords136952}{\nofchars780629}{\*\company  University of Hull}{\nofcharsws915750}{\vern16389}}\margl1797\margr1797 
\deftab1080\widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\makebackup\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\hyphcaps0\horzdoc\dghspace120\dgvspace120\dghorigin1701\dgvorigin1984\dghshow0\dgvshow3\jcompress\viewkind4\viewscale100\nolnhtadjtbl\rsidroot4139880 
\fet0\sectd \sbknone\linex0\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4
\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}
{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \s22\qc \fi-1080\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar
\tx1080\tx1440\nooverflow\faauto\rin0\lin1080\itap0\pararsid8798677 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\b\insrsid5400429 NOTES
\par }{\insrsid5400429 (version 1a)}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }\pard \s22\ql \fi-1080\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\nooverflow\faauto\rin0\lin1080\itap0\pararsid8798677 {\insrsid8798677 
\par }\pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid8798677 \fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 {\cf1\insrsid4139880 SHROPSHIRE. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote the running title }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 SCIR0PESC1RE. }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in vermilion capitals across the top of the page centred above both columns, on each side of folios 252ab to 260cd inclusive. The form }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Sciropescire }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
also appears in the heading of the Landholders' List on folio 252a.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4356906 \tab }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 When quoting from the text, the abbrev
iated forms are retained wherever possible, or the extensions to them are enclosed in square brackets; only where there is no doubt is the Latin extended silently. The Anglo-Saxon}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 letters thorn (\'fe
) and eth (\'f0) are reproduced as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 th}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }\pard \ql \fi-1080\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\faauto\rin0\lin1080\itap0\pararsid8798677 {\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 C1\tab [* IN SHREWSBURY HUN
DRED *]. The city paid tax for 100 hides in 1086 (C13) and was evidently considered to be a hundred, like Cambridge. Headings for land in or associated with Shrewsbury occur at 1,3-4. 3c,12. 3d,3. 6,33 and in this edition a hundred head has been supplied 
above any possession in the city of Shrewsbury, whether measured in hides or not.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab SHREWSBURY. Little is known about the early history of Shrewsbury. The name appears to mean 'the fortified place in or of the scrubland' and has nothing to do with the person
al name Scrob as in Richard Scrob or Scrope. In 901 Ealdorman Aethelred of Mercia and his wife Aethelflaed stayed }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 in civitate scrobbensi}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  with leading Mercians: Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , no. 221. There must have been sufficient accommodation for such a host. The Latin adjective }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 scrobbensis}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 contains no reference to defences, and coins struck there later in the reign of Edward the Elder (899-924) tend to bear the name }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Scrob}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, though this might be an abbreviation. However, a mint could probably only be estab
lished in a fortified place and it is likely that the defences of the borough were the work of Ealdorman Aethelred of Mercia or of his wife Aethelflaed, as part of their wider arrangements to fight off the Danes. The name of the fortified town, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Scropesbyrig}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, makes its first appearance in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle (version F) for 1006, then, with the name of its shire, in the same chronicle (versions D and E) in 1016. See Bassett, 'Anglo-Saxon Shrewsbury and its Churches', p. 1; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 267, iv. pp. xiii-xv.
\par \tab \tab For a thirteenth-century survey of this borough, see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 78b-80b, 106a-106b.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab BEFORE 1066. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Te[m]pore Regis E[dwardi]}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 usually abbreviated to }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 literally 'in the time of King Edward', i.e. from 1042 to 5th January 1066, but translated here as 'before 1066'. The phrase }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 T.R.W. (Tempore Regis Willelmi}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 :}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 'in the time of King William', i.e. 1066-1087) also occurs frequently in Great Domesday and is translated as 'after 1066'. Compare }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 T.R. chnut }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ('in King Ca
nute's time') in 3c,2, and see also 4,1,12 'in the time of (King) Aethelred'.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab PAID \'a37 16s 8d. Domesday uses the old English currency system which lasted for a thousand years until 1971. The pound contained 20 shillings, each of 12 pence, abbreviated respectively as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \'a3}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 ibrae}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 s}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 olidi}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 d}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
enarii}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ). Domesday often expresses sums above a shilling in pence (as 22d for the fisheries in 4,1,3) and above a pound in shillings (as 45s and 40s in 1,7).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab IN TRIBUTE. Domesday has }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de gablo}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 gablum }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 gafol) }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
here was a rent paid to the landlord (in this case the king) from the houses he held in lordship in a borough; see Ballard, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday Boroughs}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, pp. 88-91. The rate of payment per house varied from county to county; here it would seem to have been 7 \'bd d, if one reads \'a37 16s 8d as a scribal error for \'a37 17s 6d. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 294, errs in making the average payment just over 1s 7d a house, which would make the total payment almost \'a320.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 C2\tab KING'S P
EACE ... MADE AN OUTLAW ... 100s. Identical forfeitures are given in the account of the customs of Worcester (WOR C4). In Chester, however, the fine of 100s was due also when the peace was given 'by the king's hand' (CHS C3) and a different fine was payab
le in Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire (NTT S1).
\par \tab \tab See also Fleming, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday Book and the Law}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 223 no. 1307.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab HIGHWAY ROBBERY OR HOUSE-BREAKING. A fine of 100s for}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  forestel(lum) }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ('waylaying' or 'ambush') and for }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 heinfare }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
('breaking into a house' or 'breach of the peace within a house') is also recorded in Domesday for Worcestershire (WOR C4) and Herefordshire (WOR C13), and for the latter only in Oxfordshire (OXF 1,13). In Chester there were two rates for these crimes: 
\'a34 if they were committed on the 12 days of Christmas, certain other holy days or on a Sunday, but 40s if committed on any other day (CHS C6).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 C3\tab TO STALL GAME. Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 ad stabilitionem. }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Compare HEF C3 where one man from each house in Hereford had to stall game in the woodland (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 ad stabilitionem in silua
}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ) and BRK B11 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 ad stabilitionem uenationis}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 : 'stalling for the hunt'),}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
a fine being payable if a man did not go. The method was to drive deer and other game from all sides into the centre of a gradually contracting circle of men, where, presumably, there would be a net, pen or stall in which to trap the animals; see Ellis, }
{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 General Introduction to Domesday Book}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 111. In CHS Rl,40a a cognate word }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 stabilitura }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
seems to imply an enclosure formed of nets or fences, similar in purpose to a 'hay' (see 3c,2 enclosures note).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab MARSLEY? PARK. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Parcus }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 was usually an area of woodland reserved for hunting within the bounds of the manor (but see HEF 1,41 park note) and contrasts with}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 foresta}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 land outside. On several occasions in Great Domesday the phrase }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 parcus bestiarum }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 siluaticarum}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 'a park for (woodland or wild) beasts' is used (for example, DEV 1,64. CAM 14,78. CAM 41,1) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 parcus ferarum }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
occurs in HEF 1,41. It is possible that here quite an extensive 'chase' is intended, in view of the isolation of Marsley (if correctly identified). To the south and west the nearest Domesday vills are Ratlinghope and Overs (between 3 \'bd
 and 4 miles away) and Rorrington, Middleton and Priestweston (5-7 miles).
\par \tab \tab The park intended was probably at Marsley in Habberley parish, apparently the only occurrence of the name in modern Shropshire: Foxall, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Gazetteer of the County of Salop}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 It had probably been a Saxon hunting-lodge; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 309 note 4, viii. p. 239; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 45.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 C4\tab SH
ERIFF ... WALES ... 40s. An identical fine for not following the sheriff's orders to march into Wales appears in HEF C10; compare HEF A8. HEF 1,49. WOR C5. The fine in WAR B6 was 100s for not following the king on an expedition by land.
\par \tab \tab See also Fleming, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday Book and the Law}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 224 no. 1308.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab SUMMONED. The Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 edictus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  could imply a proclamation or posting of the list in the form of an edict.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 C5\tab WOMAN ... HUSBAND ... 20s ... GIRL ... 10s. It is interesting that the same payment was due in Chester from a widow and from a girl if they committed intercourse unlawfully: CHS C9.
\par \tab \tab See also Fleming, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday Book and the Law}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 224 no. 1309.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab IN ANY WAY \'85 IN WHATEVER WAY. Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 maritum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 'husband' implies marriage, not co-habitation or adultery. Marriage in the Anglo-Saxon period was normally a contract between a man and his spouse's kinsfolk. The provisions here govern a first marriage and one after a hu
sband's death. The formula 'in any way \'85 in whatever way' is probably intended to cover all eventualities and does not in itself suggest that there were several different forms of marriage.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 C6\tab HOUSE BURNT DOWN ... 40s ... 2s. In CHS C13 a man from whose}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 house a fire started paid a fine of 3 "orae"}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
of pence and gave 2s to his next door neighbour.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab ACCIDENT, HAPPENING OR CARELESSNESS. This is a more exact translation than the 'misfortune, accident or carelessness' of the Phillimore printed translation. Latin }{\i\insrsid4139880 casus}{\insrsid4139880  is from the verb }{
\i\insrsid4139880 cado}{\insrsid4139880  ('to fall') and refers to a fall, or collapse or to something that falls on or befalls someone. Latin }{\i\insrsid4139880 eventus}{\insrsid4139880  is from the verb }{\i\insrsid4139880 evenio}{\insrsid4139880 
 ('to happen, result, emerge, turn out') while }{\i\insrsid4139880 negligentia}{\insrsid4139880  (from }{\i\insrsid4139880 nec}{\insrsid4139880  and }{\i\insrsid4139880 lego}{\insrsid4139880 
) means 'ignoring something' or 'a failure to do something'. The Alecto edition has 'by misfortune or accident or by negligence'. }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Fleming, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday Book and the Law}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 224 no. 1310, has 'misfortune, accident, or negligence'.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 siue}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  ('or') was wr
itten over erasure by the main scribe of Great Domesday; there is an erased memo in the inner margin next to it. There are 12 other marginal memos in Shropshire: 1,1;8. 2,1. 3b,1. 3f,2. 4,3,28;31;58;61. 4,25,3;6. 6,30. In each case the scribe jotted down 
i
n the margin a note of what he wanted to insert in the adjacent text (not necessarily the full insertion), generally because he had erased something there and was waiting for the surface of the parchment to be re-prepared for writing after the removal by 
s
craping of the original text. He then usually erased his marginal notes when he had inserted the material, but see 4,3,28 hide note and 4,3,61 woodland note. On these marginal memos in Great Domesday, see Thorn, 'Marginal Notes and Signs', p. 126 (= Erski
ne and Williams, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 The Story of Domesday Book}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 191).}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 C7\tab IN DEATH-DUTY. Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 releuamentum }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 releuatio }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 was similar to the Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 heregeatu}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,
}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Middle English }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 heriot}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 :}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 a}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
form of death-duty, payable by an heir on taking up his inheritance. Originally the he
riot and the 'relief' were payments in horses and arms (for example, HEF C5. HEF 1,49. BRK B10. CAM B13-14), but like many other customary dues in kind they came to be commuted for payments in money, as here. A payment of 10s was also due by someone wanti
ng to take possession of his land in Chester (CHS C11) and by a man without a horse in HEF C5, although there an alternative due was the man's land with its houses; see NTT C3 note; Ellis, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 General Introduction to Domesday Book}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. pp. 268-72; Freeman, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Norman Conquest}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. Appendix, note II.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab See also Fleming, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday Book and the Law}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 224 no. 1311.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 C8\tab BROKE THE TIME-LIMIT. The Latin is }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 frangebat terminum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
According to Morris, 'Office of Sheriff', p. 158, this was to do with the sheriff's holding of local
 courts in Shrewsbury: if a burgess did not present himself at one he was fined. Compare HEF A7, which records that a fine was due from anyone who, when summoned by the sheriff, did not attend the shire or hundred meetings, and CHS R1,40c where the fine w
as 10s for staying away from the shire moot without reasonable excuse and 5s for staying away from the hundred. This court might be the one trying his particular case: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 295. It is possible, however, that the 'time-limit' was the date imposed by the sheriff for paying a fine and if this date were missed a further fine of 10s would be exacted. Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 terminus }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
can also mean a physical limit, a boundary, which is how it was translated in CHS Rl,41. CHS R5,3. However, that sense does not seem to be applicable here.
\par \tab \tab See also Fleming, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday Book and the Law}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 224 no. 1312.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 C9\tab SHED BLOOD ... 40s. The fine in Chester (CHS C5) for shedding blood depended on when it was shed: 20s if on certain holy days and from Saturday noon to Monday morning, but 10s for the rest of the week. Compare C2 robbery note.

\par \tab \tab See also Fleming, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday Book and the Law}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 224 no. 1313.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 C10\tab SHERIFF SENT HIM 24 HORSES FROM? LEINTWARDINE. The Latin reads }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 mitteb' ei .xxiiii. caballos uicecom' Lenteurde. }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Since }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lenteurde }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
is not inflected, its case is in doubt. It is hardly likely to be genitive 'the sheriff of Leintwardine' or locative, 'the sheriff at Leintwardine'. Nor will it be accusative of direction 'sent ... to Leintwardine' since the king's journey to Staffordshir
e from Shrewsbury would have taken him along Watling Street; Staffordshire would not easily be reached via Leintwardine. A double journey seems implied: 24 horses are despatched from Leintwardine to Shrewsbury and then accompany the king on his journey to
 
Staffordshire. Leintwardine had been a royal manor before 1066 (6,11) and stood in a strategically important gap in the hills at the confluence of the Rivers Teme and Clun; it would have been a key manor for controlling the Welsh March. It may be that cav
alry was available from there; compare LEC C2.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab THE FIRST MANOR IN STAFFORDSHIRE. If the journey was along Watling Street, the first manor would be Sheriffhales (STS 8,5), the centre of which lies to the north of the road; Weston under Lizard (STS 14,1) lie
s directly on the line. The Alecto edition translates }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 mansionem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  as 'house'. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Mansio}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  is the normal term employed in Exon for }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 manerium}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , and it is possible that, in this unusual phrase, the scribe failed to change the term that he found in the circuit volume that preceded Domesday Shropshire.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 C11\tab AFTER. In the manuscript this is }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 postq}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  with a line through the descender of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 q}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (= }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 postquam}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 ).}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Farley misprinted it with an elongated }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 z}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 -shaped abbreviation mark after the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 q}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
; this ending usually abbreviates }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 que}{\insrsid4139880  in }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 the Great Domesday manuscript. Farley also used the same elongated }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 z}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  abbreviation wrongly in 3g,7 (in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 s'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ) and in 3d,7 his }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 usq}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  with it, while technically correct, did not reproduce the manuscript reading of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 usq;}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
. He also occasionally reproduced a capital letter in the manuscript as a lower-case one (as in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 modo }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in 4,1,9;25 etc. and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 wast' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,1,11-12 etc.) and vice versa (as in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Leuuedes }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in 4,1,30 and see 5,7 leagues note and SHR 8 Hugh note). Such minor errors occ
ur in other Great Domesday counties as well. See also L3 church note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab LIKE OTHER MONEYERS IN THE COUNTRY ... 20s. The phrase }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 ut alii monetarii patriae}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (genitive, meaning }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Angliae}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , 'England')}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 would seem to belong to the buying of the dies to strike the coin
age, because in fact the payment which moneyers made varied somewhat over the country. In Hereford the custom was that each moneyer paid 18s for acquiring the dies and then within a month of returning with them had to pay the king 20s (HEF C9), whereas in
 Worcester the payment for receiving the dies in London was 18s (WOR C1). In Chester, Lewes, Dorchester, Bridport, Wareham and Shaftesbury the rate was \'a3
1 when the coinage was changed, but no mention is made of acquiring dies or of a time-limit for the due:
 CHS C19. SUS 12,1. DOR B1-4. In the Dorset boroughs referred to above the moneyers also each paid the king 1 mark of silver (13s 4d) which appears to be separate from the 20s payable on a change of coinage. In Huntingdon three moneyers paid 40s, but are 
no longer there: HUN B19.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 C12\tab 
KING HAD TWO PARTS AND THE SHERIFF THE THIRD. The division of a borough's total revenues between the king and the sheriff (or more often the earl), particularly before 1066, at a rate of two-thirds to one-third is frequently re
corded in Domesday Book (for example, HEF C12. STS B12. CHS C2;22. DEV C2. KEN D1. GLS B1); see Tait, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Medieval English Borough}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, pp. 139-93. These revenues generally included the house rents, ground rents, market tolls, profits of the court, the mint, the king's mill etc; see Tait, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Medieval English Borough}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 141; Round 'The 'Tertius Denarius' of the Borough',}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 pp. 62-64. Domesday Herefordshire (HEF C12) states that the customary dues detailed 'above' (i.e. in HEF C2-11), many of them the same as in this Shr
opshire section, 'formed (part of) the revenues (of Hereford)'. In 1086 Earl Roger received all the revenues of Shrewsbury amounting to \'a340 in 1085; on the total revenue from the city and the county, see 4,1,37. See also Morris, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Medieval English Sheriff}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 44 note 32. For 'the third penny of the hundred' which is quite different, see 4,1,1 pennies note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab THIS SURVEY. The Latin is }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 huius descriptionis}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
genitive, that is the Enquiry resulting in Great Domesday including the actual writing of it. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Descriptio}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  is
 also used in Great Domesday with this meaning in CHS FT2,19 and KEN 2,2; in GLS 1,63 the meaning is restricted to the Enquiry. The most famous occurrence is in the colophon of Little Domesday Book, which states that 'in the1086th year from the incarnatio
n of the lord, the 20}{\cf1\up6\insrsid4139880 th}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  of the reign of William, this }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 descriptio}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  was made, not only throughout these three counties, but also throughout others'.
\par \tab \tab Shropshire was probably surveyed as part of the same circuit as Herefordshire, Worcestershire, Cheshire and Gloucestershire (circuit V); see \{Introduction: Circuit\}
. The names of the Commissioners responsible for Worcestershire (and probably for the whole of this circuit) are given in Hemming's Cartulary (Hearne, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hemingi Chartularium}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 288) as Bishop Remigius (
of Lincoln), Henry of Ferrers, Walter Giffard and Adam (brother of Eudo the steward); none of them held land in Shropshire.
\par \tab \tab See also Fleming, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday Book and the Law}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 224 no. 1314.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 C13\tab HIDES. The hide is a unit of land measurement, either of product
ivity, of extent or of tax liability; it contained 4 virgates. Administrators attempted to standardize the hide at 120 acres, but incomplete revision and special local reductions left hides of widely differing extents in different areas. There is some evi
dence that there were smaller hides of perhaps 40 or 48 acres in the south-west as well as in Northamptonshire; see 7,4 acres note and \{Hides\}
. In many counties the number of hides corresponds quite closely to the ploughland estimate (1,5 hide note), but in
 Shropshire there are more than twice the number of ploughs either at work or possible than there are hides. This fact and the fact that the 'County Hidage', probably dating from the eleventh century ( Maitland, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Domesday Book and Beyond}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 455-60) states that Shropshire had 2400 hides whereas only about 1500 are recorded in Great Domesday suggest that a reduction in tax assessment had taken place; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire
}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. pp. 281-82 and \{Introduction: History\}.
\par \tab \tab Unlike in Herefordshire, where there was a distinction between areas that had long been under English rule and were measured in hides and those that had been recently acquired from the Welsh and were measured in terms of ploughlands }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 (carucatae)}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in Shropshire all the land, with two or perhaps three 
exceptions, whether newly conquered or not, either was not measured at all (for example, the land of Ial in 4,2,1, and the 3 Welsh districts in 4,1,13 and 4,3,42) or was assessed in hides: Clunbury (4,20,4) and Neen Sollars (5,8) are stated never to have 
paid tax and not to be hidated and see 4,1,15 ploughs note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab OF THESE. St Alkmund's 2 hides are mentioned, but not named, at 3g,2. St Juliana's \'bd hide is also unnamed and unidentified at 3h,1. The 1 hide of St Milburga's was at Sutton (3c,12); the 1\'bd hides 
of St Chad's were at Shelton (1,4), held from the Bishop of Chester; St Mary's 1 virgate was at Meole Brace (3d,3); the Bishop of Chester's 1 hide was at Crow or 'Monk' Meole (1,3) while Edith's 3 hides held by Ralph of Mortimer were at Meole Brace (6,33)
.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [* OF SHREWSBURY *] ... [* OF MUCH WENLOCK *]. On all these churches, see SHR 3c St Milburga note, 3d St Mary note, 3f St Chad's note, 3g St Alkmund's note and 3h St Juliana's note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [* QUEEN *] EDITH. See 4,27,6 Edith note.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab }{\insrsid4139880 The Domesday forms of her name - }{\i\insrsid4139880 Eddid}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Edid}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Eddied}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Ediet}{
\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Edied}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Edded}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Edged}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Edit}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Eddiet}{\insrsid4139880 
 - represent Old English }{\i\insrsid4139880 Eadgyth}{\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\insrsid4139880 
, pp. 231-32. JRM preferred the modern name Edith, as does the Alecto edition (except for KEN D25, where it has Eadgyth, perhaps in error).}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 C14\tab THIS ENTRY was a later addition by the main scribe of Great Domesday at the end of this section on the 'customs'
 of the borough of Shrewsbury. This complaint by the English burgesses that they were paying too much in tax may have arrived after the compilation of the circuit volume, which was the main, if not the only, source for Domesday Shropshire. It was written 
in paler ink and smaller writing than the preceding customs and was inserted at the same time as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 7 tenuit}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 on folio 252b (see 1,9 held note) and probably as an unnamed holding on folio 256d (see 4,9,4 entry note). The scribe wrote it on the first line of the horizontal scorings that appear only on this column in Shropshire (see \{
Introduction: Writing and Correction\}).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab IT IS VERY HARD ON THEM. Fleming, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday Book and the Law}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 224 no. 1315, translates 'The English burgesses of Shrewsbury say that is is very hard for them to pay \'85
 '. However, the Latin is clear: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 dicunt \'85 multum grave sibi esse quod ipsi reddunt\'85}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 literally 'it is very heavy on them namely that \'85 '. The use of Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 grave}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880  here is idiomatic (compare }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 graviter fero}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  'I take badly', literally 'I bear heavily'). The }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 quod}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 clause is explanatory. The meaning Fleming gives corresponds to }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 multum difficile sibi esse reddere}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab AS MUCH TAX. The main scribe of Great Domesday originally wrote }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 tot }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ('so many'), but corrected it immediately to }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 t\'f1t}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
; the new verticals of an }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 n}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 can be seen inside the curves of the original }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 o}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Farley misprinted }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 tot}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  with an abbreviation line over the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 t}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , though there is no need for one in this word.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab AS WAS PAID. The Latin is }{\i\insrsid4139880 reddebat' }{\insrsid4139880 with the abbreviation sign that indicates an omitted }{\i\insrsid4139880 -ur}{\insrsid4139880 , which extends to }{\i\insrsid4139880 reddebatur}{
\insrsid4139880 , the third person singular of the imperfect passive tense. The same abbreviation sign is used twice in 4,26,3 in }{\i\insrsid4139880 calumniat'}{\insrsid4139880  (= }{\i\insrsid4139880 calumniatur}{\insrsid4139880 ) and }{
\i\insrsid4139880 testat'}{\insrsid4139880  (= }{\i\insrsid4139880 testatur}{\insrsid4139880 ). However, }{\i\insrsid4139880 reddebat'}{\insrsid4139880  here was mistranslated as }{\i\insrsid4139880 reddebant }{\insrsid4139880 ('they paid') in }{
\i\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 310, the Phillimore printed edition, the Alecto edition and }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Fleming, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday Book and the Law}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 224 no. 1315.}{
\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab EARL'S CASTLE HAS TAKEN OVER ... . A common cause of the disappearance of houses in boroughs was the building of a castle there; see, for example, GLS G4. WAR B2. CAM B1. DEV C3. However, }{\i\f703\cf1\insrsid4139880 masur\'ea }
{\cf1\insrsid4139880 here probably mean messuages, that is the sites of houses with or without the houses themselves: C14 messuages note.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Shrewsbury occupies a naturally defended site in a bend of the River Severn and the name itself refers to some early fortification. A royal garrison (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 praesidium regis}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
) was besieged here in 1069 by the 'Welsh and the men of Chester', and Robert of Bell\'eame's men were beset here in 1102 during his rebellion; see Orderic Vitalis, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Ecclesiastical History}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 (Chibnall, ii. pp. 228-29; vi. pp. 28-31). King Henry took the castle and deprived Earl Robert of all his English lands and titles
. The ex-earl went to the continent. Those who had held under him, but had not rebelled with him, were mostly allowed to retain their lands and become tenants-in-chief, their lands usually descending in their families for some generations. On the other ha
nd, no new earl was appointed, the county being administered by its sheriff and initially by a local justiciar: \{Introduction: Administration of the Shire\}.
\par \tab \tab On the castle, see King, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Castellarium Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 430, 436.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 51 MESSUAGES. Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 ma}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 n}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 sura }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
is an awkward word to translate: it can mean a plot (of land) for a house, or the land and a house built on it (as in 3b,3) or sometimes, apparently, the house itself, and the meaning can change between one entry and the next in Great Domesday. For ex
ample, in WIL M1, 'In ... Malmesbury ... 25 messuages (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 masuras}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in which are houses (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 domus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 )',}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 the meaning of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 masuras }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 must be plots of land, but thereafter in this Wiltshire section the meaning seems to change to the dwelling itself (WIL M2;11 'half a derelict dwelling (}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 masura uasta}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 )').}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 In this Shropshire entry, too, the meaning may change; here the 51 messuages may possibly be empty sites, but the 50 }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
masurae ... vastae }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 seem likely to have been houses now derelict and empty.
\par \tab \tab The related term }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 mansio }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 also has several meanings similar to }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 ma(n)sura}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see NTT B8 where there are 3 }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 mansiones }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 in which 11 houses (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 domus) }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 are sited. In the account of Norwich (NFK 1,61) a distinction seems to be made several times between }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 mansurae }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 domus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 : for example, Rabel is stated to have 2 houses and 2 messuages. But in SOM 40,1 the main scribe of Great Domesday changed the '1 house (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 domus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ) in Bath ...}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and another messuage (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 mansuram}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ) also in this borough' in Exon to 'in Bath 2 houses'. In Colchester (ESS B1), there were }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 iiii mansi
ones terrae}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  ('plots of land', that is, for building purposes).}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Haga}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 usually translated in this edition as 'site' when in a town (it is linked etymologically with }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 haia}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
: 3c,2 enclosures note), also seems to have a similar meaning to }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 ma}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 n}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 sura}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 :}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
in Wallingford (BRK B1) 8 }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 hagae }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 were destroyed for a castle, like the 51 }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 masurae }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 here, the four in WAR B1, the 14 }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 domus }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 in GLS G4 and the 27 }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 domus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  in CAM B1. In BRK B2 (as in SUR 19,1) both }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 mansurae }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 hagae }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
occur as paying dues and it is not clear whether a distinction is intended between them. Ballard, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday Boroughs}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 13, agrees that the terms }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 masura}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  domus }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 haga }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 were practically synonymous and that a rent coming from a burgess would seem to be the same as that coming from a }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 mansura}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 the house he lived in. See also Ellis, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 General Introduction to Domesday Book}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
i. pp. 244-45 note 2.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ABBEY, WHICH HE IS BUILDING THERE. That is, St Peter's; see SHR 3b St Peter's note. The burgesses are mentioned in 3b,1.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 200 MESSUAGES, LESS 7. This edition keeps to the exact translation here and elsewhere with }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 minus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  ('less'),}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
rather than translating them as 193 messuages, because sometimes the reason for the subtraction is noted (for example, in 4,20,8 the 'less 5s' of the value of the men-at-arms' holding is accounted for in the \'a3
6 5s of Picot's holding; see also WIL 2,1 '100 hides, less 3' where the removal of the 3 hides is explained. Th
e total of 193 messuages here is made up of the 183 messuages mentioned in the rest of the entry which for one reason or another did not pay tax (assuming one burgess per house) and (presumably) the 10 unoccupied messuages recorded in Shrewsbury in 1,1.}{
\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 LIST 2\tab LIST OF THOSE WHO HOLD LAND. Most county schedules begin with the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Terra Regis}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, the king's land. But Shropshire was in effect a palatine earldom under Roger of Montgomery. Thus Earl Roger held the lands that had come into King William's hands by conquest; see 4,1,37 county note, 4,28,5 Farlow note, 4,1 Roger note and \{
Introduction: History\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 L3\tab SAINT-REMY'S CHURCH. In the manuscript the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 S' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Sanctus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
has been written over what appears to be un-erased ink blot and is rather blurred, especially in the facsimile. Farley here and elsewhere in Shropshire has }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 S}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 with a horizontal line through it or above it instead of the diagonal line through it that is used in the manuscript (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 $}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ); compare C11 after note.
\par \tab \tab Saint-R\'e9my's Church is only the first of the eight churches to be detailed in chapter 3; see SHR 3a Saint-R\'e9my's note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 L4\tab EARL ROGER ... REMAINDER. This was written on the line immediately below the line containing }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 .IX. Nigellus medicus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
not with a space before it as Farley printed.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 L5\tab OSBERN SON OF RICHARD. Lewis ('Introduction', }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Shropshire Domesday}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 7) maintains that the entries for Osbern son of Richard, Ralph of Mortimer (L6), Roger of Lacy (L7), Hugh the ass (L8) and Nigel the doctor (L9) were later additions to the Landholders' List, inserted beside numbers }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 I}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880  to }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 IIII}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, with two on one line in order to 'leave the statement that Earl Roger and his men held what remained as the last item, though the numbering was not altered and the logic of the list as it was left is unsatisfactory'. However, a study of th
e manuscript reveals that the reason why the main scribe of Great Domesday did not write entry }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 IIII}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  immediately after }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 III}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  was because he had already written }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 V}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  to }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 IX}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , the last opposite a space. There is no sign from a change of ink, pen or style that numbers }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 V}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  to }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 IX}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  were not written after }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 I}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  to }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 III}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 . The scribe then wrote }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 IIII}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 : }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 COMES ROGERIUS}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (lined through in red)}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Q}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 uo}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\f710\cf1\insrsid4139880 d Reliqu\'fb \'e7 tenet c\'fb suis hominib}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 us}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ] below both columns of landholders because of its length and the important and unusual information it con
tained; compare the similar statement in Cheshire (after CHS C25). The order of inscription of this list was therefore }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 I}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  to }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 III}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 V}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880  to }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 IX}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 IIII}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , in one stint as part of the initial writing campaign. In Lewis' view the scribe only became aware of the existen
ce of these five tenants-in-chief after he had finished writing the first quire and so had to start a second quire for them: if he had found them earlier he could have 'inserted extra leaves' into the first quire. He could in fact still have added a half-
s
heet (one folio) to the end of the first quire, as he did at the end of Wiltshire, Dorset and Northamptonshire. There is similarly no evidence that the fiefs of these five tenants were overlooked and added later. On the probable reason for the scribe's st
arting a second quire, rather than adding a half-sheet at the end of the first quire, see \{Introduction: Writing and Correction\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 L6\tab RALPH OF MORTIMER. See L5 Osbern note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 L7\tab ROGER OF LACY. See L5 Osbern note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 L8\tab HUGH DONKEY. See L5 Osbern note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 L9\tab NIGEL THE DOCTOR. See L5 Osbern note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 1\tab LAND OF THE BISHOP OF CHESTER. The lands that became Shropshire lay in two dioceses, those of Chester and of Herefordshire (SHR 1-2).}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab }{\insrsid4139880 The see of Mercia was fixed at Lichfield in Staffordshire by Ceadda (St Chad), Bishop of the Mercians, the }{\i\insrsid4139880 Lindisfari}{\insrsid4139880 
 (the inhabitants of Lindsey, later in Lincolnshire) and the Middle Angles between 664 and 672. The church was built on land that had apparently been given earlier by King Wulfhere of Mercia (657-674) to Bishop Wilfrith of York
 for the foundation of a monastery. St Chad's original diocesan church was on a site adjacent to the later cathedral. A new church was constructed by Bishop Headda and consecrated in 700. It was apparently dedicated to St Mary, although Bede (}{
\i\insrsid4139880 Ecclesiastical History}{\insrsid4139880 
, iv. 3: Colgrave and Mynors, pp. 344-45) gives St Mary as the dedicatee of the original church and St Peter as that of the new one. It was later dedicated to St Chad. In 822 there were 20 canons including a provost, that is, 11 pries
ts and 9 deacons. They were then living in accordance with the rule of Bishop Chrodegang of Metz.
\par \tab \tab The work of the bishops will have been disrupted by the Danish marauding and settlement of the late ninth century, since Lichfield itself would have lain ju
st within the Danish part of Mercia, if the boundary between the kingdoms was Watling Street; see \{Introduction: History\}.
\par \tab \tab The see was transferred by Bishop Peter to Chester in 1075. The cathedral church there was the church of St John the Baptist, a sec
ular college, possibly founded by King Ethelred of Mercia in 689; more likely by the earl of that name in 906. It was repaired and endowed by Earl Leofric under Edward the Confessor. The see was moved to Coventry in 1102 by Bishop Robert of Lim\'e9
sy who had been consecrated in 1086, at which point the church of Chester reverted to being a college. Canons are mentioned in Domesday. See Knowles and Hadcock, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Medieval Religious Houses}{\insrsid4139880 , pp. 413, 422.
\par \tab \tab Unless there is other evidence, it is likely that the estates 
listed in Domesday had been held by the see from much earlier times. The initial endowment of the see, like the gift of Lichfield itself, was probably due to King Wulfhere of Mercia; see \{Introduction; Ecclesiastical Organization\}.}{\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab The hundredal order of this chapter is as follows:
\par \tab \tab 1,1-2 [Shrewsbury] Hundred
\par \tab \tab 1,3-4 City (Shrewsbury) Hundred
\par \tab \tab 1,5 Wrockwardine Hundred
\par \tab \tab 1,6-7 Condover Hundred
\par \tab \tab 1,8 Hodnet Hundred
\par \tab \tab 1,9 Wrockwardine Hundred
\par \tab The entry for 'Chatshall' (1,9) appears to have been missed at some stage, as a place in Wrockwardine Hundred had already been entered.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 1,1\tab [IN SHREWSBURY HUNDRED]. The heading is implied by 1,3 'In the City Hundred'; see 1,3 city note and C1 hundred note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab THE BISHOP ... TAX. The first 1 \'bd lines of this entry (up to }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 geldant'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
) were written over erasure by the main scribe of Great Domesday. There is an erased memo in the outer margin next to the first line. On these erased marginal notes, see C6 accident note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 1,2\tab CANONS. They belonged to St Chad's in Shrewsbury; on this church, see SHR 3f St Chad's note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 1,3\tab IN THE CITY ^[SHREWSBURY]^ HUNDRED. This statement and the one at 1,4 are written in capitals and rubricated and are in the correct position for hundred
 heads in the manuscript; however, the second one is not needed as such because there is no change in hundred. One would perhaps have expected the Shrewsbury hundred head to have come before 1,1. In 4,9,4 an identical phrase }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
In eod' hund' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is written in the body of the entry, in a similar position, but it is not in capitals and is not rubricated.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [CROW] MEOLE. Crow Meole was also known as 'Monk' Meole, and was formerly in the Ancient Parish of Shrewsbury St Chad, now in the Ecclesiastical Parish of Shelton 
and Oxon. From C13 it is clear that the manor was 1 hide in extent. Much of the land formed part of the endowment of Buildwas Abbey for Cistercian monks (1,7 Buildwas note), being named as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Cronyet }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (or }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Crowmehill) }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Monkemeyt }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 iii. p. 191; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 260b; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 359; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 203.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 1,4\tab IN THE SAME HUNDRED. That is in the City (Shrewbury) Hundred; see 1,3 city note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab SHELTON. It lay in the Ancient Parish of Shrewsbury St Chad and is now in the Ecclesiastical Parish of Shelton and Oxon. On the estate, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, vi. p. 360; Bassett 'Anglo-Saxon Shrewsbury and its Churches', p. 11. For St Chad's, see SHR 3f St Chad's note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab MORE PLOUGHS WOULD BE POSSIBLE. The Latin is}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  carucae plus possent esse}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
subjunctive: in Shropshire the scribe uses this form more often than the indicative (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 potest/possunt esse}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
e.g. in 3c,8. 4,1,27-28. 4,14,18 etc.), though in Herefordshire and Worcestershire, for 
example, both forms are represented roughly equally. As the scribe may have intended to convey a slightly different meaning by the use of the subjunctive, the translation has preserved the distinction, the indicative being rendered as 'more ploughs possib
le'. It is perhaps interesting that in several entries (e.g. 4,1,5. 4,3,15) both forms occur. On this phrase being a substitute for the more common Great Domesday estimate of the ploughland, see 1,5 land note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab VALUE. By the use of the verb }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 valere }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ('to be w
orth') the Great Domesday scribe normally meant the amount due to lords from their lands; see, for example, 3d,6 where the 1086 value of Bromfield to the canons of St Mary's, Bromfield, was 50s, and HEF 24,13 where Richards Castle was worth 20s to Osbern 
son of Richard in 1086. There are also relevant examples in Devon (DEV 5,1;4. 45,3). That these amounts were due annually is made clear in Exon}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 where the phrase }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 per annum }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 frequently accompanies the value statements (it also occurs in Great Domesday in DEV 45,3).
\par \tab \tab In Shropshire, as in Bedfordshire, Berkshire etc., the scribe very often gives the value of a manor at three dates: before 1066 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ),}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 later (}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 post) }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and in 1086 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 modo}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ): for example, in 1,7. 2,1. 3b,3. The intermediate date was that at which the t
enant-in-chief took possession of the manor from King William, as can be seen by the phrases }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 quando recepit }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 invenit }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(or occasionally both, as in 4,3,11) taking the place of}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  post }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 on several occasions (often when the land was waste); see 4,3,9 acquired no
te and SHR 6 Ralph note. To establish the value at three dates seems to have been part of the brief of those undertaking the Domesday Enquiry according to the questions reproduced at the beginning of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Inquisitio Eliensis }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Hamilton, p. 97). In Exon, the 
phrase 'when he acquired it' or 'when X (the tenant-in-chief) acquired it' is regularly used when the corresponding Great Domesday entry has simply 'the value was' or 'formerly', so that when in Shropshire the scribe merely has }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
valebat }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 valuit }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 as here, with no reference to date, it is possible that he meant the value at the time the manor was acquired.
\par \tab \tab Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 reddit }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (present: 'pays') and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 reddebat/reddidit }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (past: 'paid') would seem to have a similar meaning to }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 valet}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880  and}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  valebat/valuit. }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 They often occur in the same value statement, as in 4,9,1. 4,14,27 etc. There is a view that, when }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 reddere }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 was}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 being used, it meant that a manor was being held at a revenue (i.e. 'farmed', see 3d,5 revenue note) and also that the use of}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  valere }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 often concea
led a similar fact; see Hoyt, 'Farm of the Manor' and Lennard, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rural England}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 105-41. Certainly there seems to be a distinction between }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 valet }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 reddit }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in 3f,2 and 4,4,7 and compare 4,4,8 which apparently conveys the same information in a different way. However, there are many cases in Shropshire where }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 reddebat }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 is used and there is no hint that the manor was being 'farmed': see 3b,2. 3f, 1. 3g,6 etc. Moreover, there is much evidence available from a comparison of Exon}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
with the corresponding Great Domesday entries for the south-west counties that seems to prove the interchangeability of the two verbs; see DEV 2,2 value note; CON 2,3 value note. On hawks forming part of the value of a manor, see 3c,5 eyrie note.
\par \tab \tab The word }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 ualuit}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  here seems to have been written over an erasure as it is blurred, though the parchment is very rough here so it is impossible to be certain.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 1,5\tab LONGNER. It lay in the Ancient Parish of Shrewsbury St Chad and was in Wrockwardine Hundred in}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 1086. It was later in Atcham Civil Parish
. Bassett, 'Anglo-Saxon Shrewsbury and its Churches', p. 5, suggests that Longner originated as a part of Ercall.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab In the mid-twelfth century it was held by Geoffrey son of Reginald under the Bishop of Coventry and he later gave \'bd virgate in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Longenholre }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 t
o Haughmond Abbey; see the Black Book of the Exchequer (Hearne, i. p. 133); the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, nos. 727-29); Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 205; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. no. 198.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 HIDE [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday did not put a dot after }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 hida }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
and left a small space between it and the side marginal ruling, though many lines on this column extend past this ruling by a}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 few letters. Throughout Shropshire, as in Domesday Cheshire, Herefordshire and Worcester
shire, there}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 are numerous occasions where a space has been left after the hidage of a manor. These spaces seem to have been left for the addition of the word(s) }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 geld' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
or }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 non geld' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (= }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 geldans}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , singular, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 geldantes}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , plural; see 1,6 pay note), rather than, as 
has been thought sometimes, for a fraction of a hide to be added. For example, in 4,3,31 the hidage is 4 hides and 1 virgate and so the space left after it cannot be for a fraction, and see 4,3,45 where }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 7 dimid'}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880  is interlined above}{\i\f703\cf1\insrsid4139880  viii hid\'ea geld'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  where a space would have been left for the fraction if that was the meaning of these spaces (but no space was left because }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 geld' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 had already been included). Moreover, the size of these spaces (wide enough for 4-6 letters to be inserted) would suit the addition of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 geld'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  or }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 n}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 on}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  geld'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , but would be too small for fractions such as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 7}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 dimid'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Various parts of the verb }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 geldare}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  were then later inserted, mostly by scribe B in Shropshire (see 4,1,1 pay note), though, a great many of these spaces were never filled. Someti
mes no space was left after the hidage and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 geld'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (or }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 geldant'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
) had to be interlined, as happened in 4,1,2. 4,3,5 and 4,14,17, all done by scribe B, and in 6,3 done by the main scribe. There are several other cases where the scribe left no space after the h
idage, as in 3e,1. 3g,9. 4,1,5 etc., but in many cases the hidage comes at the end of a line and the scribe may have thought that the relevant word(s) could be added in the margin, as he did in 4,7,2 and as scribe B did in 4,1,1. 4,11,17 and 4,14,15; see 
a
lso 4,3,35 hides note. Occasionally the scribe seems to have forgotten initially to leave a space and to have then left it later in the entry; see 4,24,4 land note and compare 4,17,2 land note. In some cases the manor was waste (for example, 4,23,15. 5,5-
7) and so perhaps would not have paid tax (though some waste manors did, for example, 4,20,21-23) and the scribe did not feel it necessary to mention this. It is perhaps interesting that in 1,4 no space was left after the '1 \'bd
 hides' and the statement that the manor paid tax had to be added at the end of the entry and that in the next entry (this one) a space was left.
\par \tab \tab It is possible that the reason why the scribe did not know whether certain hides paid tax or not was because the original returns for some 
holdings did not differentiate between the hidage of the lordship land (which did not pay tax) and that of the land of the villagers, subtenants etc. which did. Certainly, with the possible exception of 4,1,3, in those cases where the lordship land is giv
en in Shropshire (4,1,2 lordship note) the scribe either had included the information that the non-lordship hides paid tax or had left no space for such information to be added later.
\par \tab \tab In just over half the cases where a space has definitely been left afte
r the hidage, no dot was written after that hidage, but in the other, smaller, half there are dots; the significance of this is not clear: one would have thought that if the scribe did not intend to add anything to the hidage, which the dot seems to imply
, he would not have left a space. The dots may in several instances be accidental; for example in 4,14,13. 4,21,13 etc. there is a dot after }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 hida }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (at the end of the first line) with }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
geld' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 at the beginning of the next, not added. In Herefordshire also there are sometimes dots, and sometimes not, after the hidage: see HEF 1,9 hides note.
\par \tab \tab In some five entries the space left after the hidage is due to an erasure, which in the case of 4,27,29 was definitely of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 geld' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and was probably also in 4,19,4. 4,27,2;3 and
 possibly in 4,27,9 too (see 4,19,4 hides note, 4,27,2 hides note, 4,27,3 hide note, 4,27,9 hide note and 4,27,29 hides note). Similarly placed erasures also occur in Domesday Herefordshire. Unless, as in HEF 29,16, a link-line was drawn over the erasure 
t
o indicate that the scribe did not intend to add anything there, it is not clear whether he intended to insert something later if available and so did not write over the erasure (this would be the case if the erasure were immediate) or whether the erasure
 was done at the correcting stage of the work (in which case a link-line ought to have been drawn, unless there was suddenly a question of whether the land paid tax or not, so the scribe erased the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 geld' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
and intended later to insert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 geld' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 non geld'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  when}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
he had found out the true position); see 4,27,29 hides note. The fact that in nine or ten entries where there was an erasure after the hidage scribe B inserted }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 geld'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 (see 4,14,16. 4,19,1;5. 4,23,3;5 and perhaps 4,14,18, and also CHS A15. 1,6-8) may suggest that the main Great Domesday scribe had sometimes begun the next sentence and then realized he ought to have left a space for the possible insertion of }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 geld'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  and then continued after the erasure.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab LAND FOR 2 PLOUGHS. An estimate of the ploughlands is a co
nvenient way of giving the true arable extent of a manor without the complexities associated with the hide (on which see C13 hides note). In Domesday Shropshire two methods of giving such an estimate were used. As here, the scribe used the phrase }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Terra est ... carucis}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
normally after the hidage, and then recorded the number of ploughs actually on the manor, whether employed on the lord's own estate or by the villagers (used in the general sense). This phrase was very common in the south-west counties, in Ch
eshire, Staffordshire and elsewhere in Great Domesday, though for some reason was rarely used in Herefordshire, Worcestershire and Gloucestershire. In the vast majority of the entries in Shropshire where it is used, it can be seen that the actual ploughs 
o
n the land fall far short of the estimate (by 48 ploughs in 4,20,8 and see 2,1 ploughs note), although in some 36 cases the manors seem to have been fully 'stocked' and Pulley (6,30) had an excess of 2 ploughs in use (see also 4,19,13 ploughs note and 7,4
 servants note). In many cases, especially of the shorter entries, no ploughs were recorded, only the estimate given.
\par \tab \tab The other method used here to estimate the ploughlands was to record the ploughs on the land (whether lordship or villagers') and then to
 state how many more ploughs would be possible there. Normally this phrase on the potential ploughs occurs after the villagers' ploughs are given, though in the case of 1,4. 3b,2 and a few other entries it appears immediately after the lordship ploughs; o
c
casionally it occurs at the end of an entry or after the resources. The fact that in 4,1,5-6 the scribe states twice that more ploughs were possible, first after the lordship ploughs and then after the villagers' ploughs, would suggest that the position o
f
 these phrases was important and reflected the actual areas of plough potential; the scribe presumably either had fuller information for these manors or failed to remove it when editing from the circuit volume. In some ninety entries no estimate of the pl
oughland is given but the ploughs are merely recorded; this may indicate that these manors could support no more ploughs, though it is possible that the scribe's information was defective there, as elsewhere in Shropshire (see \{
Introduction: Writing and Correction\}).
\par \tab \tab There is no obvious reason why in Shropshire the scribe should have used both phrases to assess and record plough capacity; he cannot have been reflecting the phrase used in the original returns for different areas, as every hundred has both p
hrases represented in its lands (except perhaps Shrewsbury in the case of the 'Land for' formula). The 'more ploughs possible' form is used largely up to the end of 4,13, only appearing twice thereafter, at 4,14,18 and 4,19,1, and the 'Land for' phrase is
 
used mostly from 4,14 to the end of the county, although it does occur 49 times in the earlier part of the county, seven times in added entries (see 3d,7 land note). However, it is possible that after 4,13 he decided or was told to use the 'Land for' form
ula. In Domesday Yorkshire he had initially begun using the formula 'where there can be }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 n}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 ploughs' but changed to the 'Land for' formula on folio 325c (after YKS 14E50); where the 'Land for' formula occurs in entries before YKS 14E50 it is almost always bec
ause those entries are later additions and this gives a clue as to when the additions were made. In 4,4,20 both forms are used together: there is 'land for 41 ploughs' and '4 ploughs possible' in the lordship. The fact that both formulae occur together in
 
several fiefs and sub-chapters does not suggest that the use of one phrase or the other was the result of different preferences among those making the returns. It is possible, however, that as the positioning of the 'more ploughs possible' seems to have h
ad some meaning, the scribe used the vaguer phrase 'Land for }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 n }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
ploughs' when his material did not specify whether there could be more ploughs on the lord's manor or on the villagers' land. But this would not explain why he seems to have used two ways of sta
ting that a manor was fully stocked (by merely recording the ploughs on that manor, if that is the meaning of this, or by making those ploughs equal those in the 'Land for' statement). In some other Great Domesday counties, such as Leicestershire, more th
a
n one ploughland formula was used and it is not clear there either what occasioned the scribe's change from one phrase to another; see LEC 1,12 land note. It is interesting that in two virtually identical entries in Yorkshire the phrase '6 ploughs possibl
e' occurs in the first and 'land for 6 ploughs' in the repeat: YKS 9W131;144 (the latter entry was added, then erased).
\par \tab \tab On the frequent artificiality of the numbers in the plough assessment, see Finn, 'Teamland', pp. 96-98; Moore, 'Domesday Teamland'.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab SLAVES. As in Gloucestershire, Cornwall and Devon, the proportion of slaves (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 servi}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
in Shropshire to other categories of population was high, almost one in five, although there are numerous manors where no slaves are recorded. The slave came at the bottom en
d of the social scale; he belonged to his master utterly, providing most of the labour on his land, he could be bought and sold, had almost no rights and rarely any share in the villagers' land and ploughs; see below and Finberg, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Tavistock Abbey}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 pp. 36-38
, 60-61. He could also be freed: in GLS 38,2 William Leofric had freed 12 slaves at Hailes. In Domesday Shropshire in the folios up to folio 253a (the end of chapter 3g) the slaves are almost always listed after the villagers and their ploughs (as regular
ly in Domesday Gloucestershire and Worcestershire), but they never occur in such a position thereafter, being given either after the lordship ploughs as in such phrases as '}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 n}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  ploughs there, with }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 n }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 slaves' or 'he has ... }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 n }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 slaves'. It should be noted that Sh
ropshire never definitely states that the slaves were in lordship: although they are regularly listed after the lordship plough(s), the punctuation is ambiguous because of the ubiquitous connecting }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 7}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
. In 5,1 where no lordship ploughs are stated, the slaves
 are listed before the villagers, but the word order there is unusual in other respects as well. In four entries (4,1,36. 4,8,12. 4,14,5. 7,6) and possibly a fifth (6,6), slaves appear to have a share in the villagers' ploughs and in 4,9,4 1 villager and 
2
 slaves 'have nothing', presumably referring to their lack of ploughs. There is evidence elsewhere in Great Domesday that slaves had ploughs, or at least a share in them; for example, see HEF 1,10a. WAR 17,16. SOM 47,16. DEV 6,13. For the position of slav
es in Exon}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and whether they were classed with other }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 villani }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and so had a share in their land and ploughs, see DEV 1,3 slaves note. From the Exon}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 for Somerset (SOM 21,55; and see SOM 21,71 slave note and SOM 45,7 slaves note) it would seem that slaves occasionally held land and in the Exon}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
for Devon (DEV 3,54) a slave is said to live on a 'ferling', but see CON 5,2,7 acre note. It is perhaps also noteworthy that Domesday Middlesex, which lists the land holdings of various 'villagers' (men-at-arms, Frenchmen, 
villagers proper, smallholders and cottagers; see MDX \{Appendix\}) makes no mention of slaves with land. Exon}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 also supplies the interesting fact that slaves as well as villagers and smallholders paid \'a3
8 from Lympstone (DEV 26,1) to King William in revenue; on the practice of 'farming' land, see 3d,5 revenue note.
\par \tab \tab For the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 bouarii }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 who, like the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 servi}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 also seem to have worked the lord's ploughs, see 1,8 ploughmen note.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 1,6\tab BETTON. It was in Condover Hundred in 1086 and later divided between Condover Hundred 
and Shrewsbury Liberty. The Domesday holding is now represented by Betton Strange (SJ5009) and Betton Abbots (SJ5107). The former (in the Ancient Parish of Shrewsbury St Chad, then in Bicton Civil Parish and Ecclesiastical Parish) was alienated, probably 
in the twelfth century, by the Lestrange family (see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 215) who granted lands here to Haughmond Abbey: the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, no. 18, appendix A. i). The other portion (in Berrington Ancient Parish), called Betton Abbots, went to S
hrewsbury Abbey (the Shrewsbury Cartulary: Rees pp. xx, 23, 24 etc.). It was sometimes known as Little Betton in contrast to Great Betton (Betton in Norton-in-Hales, 4,23,9) which was also later held by Shrewsbury Abbey, sometimes as Great Betton to disti
nguish it from Betton Strange; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 iii. p. 189; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 181; }
{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 19.
\par \tab \tab Bassett, 'Anglo-Saxon Shrewsbury and its Churches', p. 5, suggests that Betton originated as a part of the great estate of Condover (4,1,2).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab WHICH PAY TAX. Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 geld' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 here and elsewhere after the hidage statement probably abbreviates the plural }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 geldantes }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 geldans}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 singular) 'paying tax' (in this series the present participle has been translated as if it were a }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 qui- }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
clause), rather than plural }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 geldant }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (singular}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  geldat}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ) 'they pay tax'. In 4,1,2 }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 geldant' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
is interlined above the hidage and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 geldantes }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is written out in full in many identical phrases in Great Domesday: for example, in GLS 11,9. 28,4. 31,2) and see also 
HEF 2,21. Later extracts from Great Domesday often use the adjectival form }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 geldabiles }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (singular }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 geldabilis}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ) 'taxable'. There are occasions when }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 geld'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  refers to the hidage and must be extended to the active finite verb }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 geldat}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  or }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 geldant }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (such 
as in 3c,9 and HEF 2,49;51), but only when a separate phrase is involved, not merely }{\i\f703\cf1\insrsid4139880 Ibi ii hid\'ea geld' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 as here.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 1,7\tab BUILDWAS. This was an Ancient Parish which lay in Condover Hundred in 1086 and was later in 'Bradford' Hundred. Any suggestion that it could
 have been in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086 is ruled out by the way the woodland is assessed (in pigs): see \{Introduction: Writing and Correction\}.
\par \tab \tab In 1135 Roger of Clinton, Bishop of 'Chester' (1129-1148), founded an abbey here for Cistercian monks as a daughter-house of Savigny. The manor of Buildwas was given to it and continued to be held by it until the Dissolution; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 163a; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. pp. 191-92; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. pp. 356-61; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 iii. pp. 49-50 no. 132; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 317; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 50-59. The remains of the abbey are at SJ642043.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab REEVE. The nine reeves (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 prepositi}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 recorded for Shropshire, one in each of nine villages, are listed wi
th the other villagers, with a share in the ploughs except for the reeve in 6,12 who had \'bd
 plough to himself. The functions of the reeve as a subordinate of the sheriff and as a local official in the manor and in the village were probably varied: Lennard, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rural England}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, pp. 271-76; Morris, 'Office of Sheriff', pp. 157-58; and HEF 1,3 reeve note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab A MILL. This was of course a water-mill, as elsewhere in Great Domesday; windmills did not appear in Britain for another century. Apart from the mills mentioned ge
nerally in 3b,1, there are some 90 mills recorded in Shropshire; only on five occasions (3c,2. 4,1,21. 4,3,16. 4,20,24 and 7,4) is more than one mill recorded per entry. More than half these mills paid a money render, ranging from 6d (in 4,3,31) to 20s in
 6,33 (the 2 mills at 26s in 7,4 are regarded as paying 13s each); two paid 3 "orae"}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (at 4,1,16;32). Seventeen mills rendered grain in some form or other; or so many packloads (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 summae}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 see 4,1,5 packloads note) of corn in eight instances and of malt and wheat in three, 8 sesters of rye in 4,17,3 (see 4,17,3 sesters note), 3 }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 mensurae }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 of wheat in 4,3,45, 24 }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 uascula }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 of corn in 4,27,21 and a }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 modium }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
of corn in 5,8 with an unspecified amount of corn in 4,4,12. Three mills rendered eels (from the mill-pond), two of
 them paying money as well. Two mills are linked with fisheries and eels also formed part of the (joint) render of the second one (4,19,2). The mill at Lydham (4,1,14) paid a pig, a very unusual render (compare the rare payment of a sester of honey from a
 mill in WOR 2,76). Three mills paid nothing and there are nine mills entered on their own with no information given, though the one at Chetton (4,1,31) is described as new. There are three references to mills serving the court (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
curia}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ),}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and one to a mill serving the Hall (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 aula)}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
meaning the lord's court on his lordship estate in each case, while the 2 mills at Much Wenlock (3c,2) served the monks (of St Milburga's). Finally, the mill at Welbatch (4,4,1) only worked in the winter not the summer, presumably be
cause the stream had insufficient water in the summer.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab WOODLAND, 200 PIGS. In Domesday Shropshire phrases such as this where there is no verb or preposition before }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 porc' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
probably mean that the woodland was of sufficient size to provide food (acorns and be
ech-mast) for a certain number of pigs (see 4,4,20;22): in 6,32 'woodland, 100 pigs' is rendered as 'woodland for fattening 100 pigs' in the duplicate entry 4,11,1. Elsewhere in Great Domesday this phrase can mean that a payment was made of so many pigs (
sometimes as many as one in three) for the right to pasture them in the woodland: MDX 2,1 pigs note. WOR 3,3 pigs note.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab In Shropshire almost three times as many woodland entries are thus described in proportion to woodland measured in another common manne
r, of extent, that is by 'square' leagues (see 3g,3 league note) in all but five entries. On the two different methods of description being linked to the hundred in which the woodland lay, see \{Introduction: Writing and Correction\}
. In 4,4,20;22 both forms of measurement are used: in each the woodland is 2 leagues long (no width is mentioned, as also in 4,23,2) and is enough to fatten 200 pigs. Some five entries state that there are hedged enclosures (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 haiae}
{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ) in the woodland: 3c,2 enclosures note. Occasionally woodland in Shropshire has a render: \'bd league pays 11d in 4,3,22, but only 3d in 4,3,23, while 1 league pays 16d in 4,3,25 and a small wood (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 silua modica
}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 pays 5d in 4,3,21, but the small woods (both described as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 silua parua}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
in 4,1,4;11 pay nothing. These may be commuted pasturage dues; compare the common Domesday phrase 'from (pig) pasturage }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 n }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 s(hillings)'.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab For three statements concerning the ownership of woodland, see 3g,7. 4,3,28 and 4,25,6; on }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 parua landa siluae}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , see 4,3,34 tract note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab LATER 40s. }{\insrsid4139880 The questions purported to have been those asked by the 'king's barons' in their enquiry, which are given in the }{\i\insrsid4139880 Inquisitio Eliensis}{\insrsid4139880 
 (Hamilton, p. 97), state that the answers should be for three periods: 'in the time of King Edward, when King William gave
 it and as it is now'. Great Domesday generally has very little information at two dates, let alone at three, though the value was usually given for when King Edward held it (or at an undisclosed time in the past) as well as 'now' and sometimes an interme
diate value was given, such as 'later' or 'when acquired', especially in the returns for circuits I and III, but see also 4,3,9 acquired note. (On the use of 'when acquired' in the }{\i\insrsid4139880 Liber Exoniensis}{\insrsid4139880 
 for the value 'formerly' in the corresponding entries in Gr
eat Domesday - usually when acquired by the tenant-in-chief but occasionally by his subtenant - see CON 1,4 value note and DEV 2,14 formerly note.) In Domesday Shropshire, however, the provision of the intermediate value is remarkably full.}{
\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 1,8\tab PREES. This was an Ancient Parish. It was in Hodnet Hundred in 1086 and later in 'Bradford' Hundred. It continued to be held by the Bishops of 'Chester': }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, iv. pp. 222, 226. In 1255 6 \'bd hides are recorded at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Pres}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 : }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 57b. The }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880  (p. 117) gives the members as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Darlaston }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Darliston SJ5833), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Leeton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (unidentified), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wotenhull' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(unidentified), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Mitteley }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Mickley SJ6132), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Willaston }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Willaston SJ5935) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Millheyth' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(Millenheath SJ5735) said to be held by the Bishop of 'Chester' of his barony of Eccleshall; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 244; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 250b; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 iii. p. 128; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, i. no. 170, v. no. 5.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab A PRIEST. There appears to have been a Saxon superior church or minster here: }{\insrsid4139880 Knowles and Hadcock, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Medieval Religious Houses}{\insrsid4139880 , p. 435;}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  \{
Introduction: Ecclesiastical Organization\}. Its work may have been interrupted by the fact that it was waste for some time between 1066 and 1086.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab SMALLHOLDERS. The term }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 bordarius}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 written in full in 4,1,26 (which is rare in Great Domesday), apparently comes from }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 borda }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 'a wooden hut' (perhaps Frankish hypothetical }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 bord(e)}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 derived from common Germanic }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 bord}
{\cf1\insrsid4139880  'plank'). Unlike the slave (see 1,5 slaves note) the smallholder seems to have had a hut of his own to live in: Finberg, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Tavistock Abbey}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 62. Although there are not quite as many smallholders mentioned in Domesday Shropshire as in neighbouring Herefordshire, Staffordshire and Cheshire, they still form almost
 a quarter of the recorded population. In Shropshire they are always listed after any villagers in an entry, though, as here, not always immediately after, and (except in 4,3,68) before the cottagers (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 cotarii}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
),}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 who, though like them in many respects, may have been poorer (see 3c,10 cottager note). Smallholders seem to have been very similar to, if not identical with, Cottagers (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 coscez}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 ),}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 before whom they are also listed in this county; see 2,2 Cottager note.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Smallholders are often recorded as having ploughs of their own (for example, in 4,8,6 where 1 smallholder has \'bd}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
plough and see 3b,5. 3c,7. 3g,4 etc.), but they may also have shared in the ploughs ascribed to other 'villagers' (as here and in 2,1. 3b,2-3 etc.). They are also recorded occasionally in Grea
t Domesday as having some land of their own (for example, in HRT 33,17. 34,13. SOM 9,5. 21,22;25;31. DEV 20,6). See MDX \{Appendix\}
 for a summary of the land holdings of smallholders, among other classes, in that county. There is also the evidence of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Inquisitio Eliensis}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  and of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Inquisitio Comitatus Cantabrigiensis}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  for smallholders in Cambridgeshire who had land, ranging from 1 \'bd}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 acres to 15 acres (though 5 acres is the commonest holding, as it is for the }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 cotarius}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 see 3c,10 cottager note). See also 4,14,15 smallholder note.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Smallholders may also have shared in the land holding recorded for the 'villagers' as a whole in Exon;}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 this is most likely to be the case where Exon}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 replaces the general term }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 uillani }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 with the more specific }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 bordarii}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 DOR}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 12,16 smallholders note; CON 1,7 smallholders note; SOM \{Introduction: Exon Extra Information and Discrepancies\}.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Smallholders are sometimes recorded in Great Domesday as paying dues: KEN 5,150. 9,54. SUR 6,1. DOR 1,23. 57,2 (see DOR 57,2 smallholders no
te). They probably owed their lords some form of labour service: HEF 19,1. In 4,23,17 here it is not clear whether the 4 smallholders recorded paid the 2s as well as the settler: 4,23,17 pays note.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab See Lennard, 'Bordars and Cottars'.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab PLOUGHMEN. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bouarii}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 literally men who look after the oxen (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 boues}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ),}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 apparently of the lordship plough, which they worked. There were probably two men to a plough, though single ploughmen are recorded in 4,3,8;63. 4,6,1. 4,14,11 and 4,21,4 and there are several cases in Shrops
hire where there is not a ratio of two ploughmen to one plough, even if the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 servi }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 are included with the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 bouarii. }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
They may have been of servile status though perhaps on the way to becoming free (in the early twelfth century they seem to have held land, perhaps as much as \'bd virgate each and they may have been armed). A }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 liber bouarius }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 is recorded in 4,3,63, while 'free ploughmen' are mentioned in HEF 8,2. 9,6-7;9, although in all but one case they are listed with slaves, so the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 liber }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 may not contrast one sort of }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 bouarius }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 with another, but the whole class of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 bouarii }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 with the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 serui. }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
There must have been a real distinction between the ploughmen and slaves, even though their jobs were identical for much of the time, because Great Domesday records both categories together in several manors. In 4,11,2 the scribe wrote }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 serui }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and then underlined it for deletion and interlined }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 bouar'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
but this may merely have been because he misread his exemplar.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par \tab \tab }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Although }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 bouarii }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 are}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 recorded in Domesday Shropshire, Herefordshire, Worc
estershire and Cheshire and once in Warwickshire, nearly half of them appear in Shropshire - almost 390 on about 90 manors. They are usually listed immediately after the lordship plough(s) - with the slaves before them in some seven instances and after th
em in three - though sometimes they appear after the 'villagers' and occasionally (as in the sub-holdings in 4,1,2;8) they seem to have had a share in their ploughs.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab For a full discussion, see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Worcestershire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i.}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 pp. 274-76; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Herefordshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, i. pp. 288-89; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. pp. 302-304; Tait, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday Survey of Cheshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 67-70; Slack, 'Shropshire Ploughmen'; Nelson, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Normans in South Wales}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 51-57.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab IN LORDSHIP ... PLOUGHS AND 2 VILLAGERS. Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 uill}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 an}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 os}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  is}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 accusative after }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 h}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 abe}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 nt}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 it is un
likely, however, that the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 in d}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 omi}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 nio }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
governs the villagers too, as it would be very unusual for villagers to be part of the lordship: 4,8,4 villager note. 4,11,4 villagers note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab WITH 1 PLOUGH. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote this over an erasure; there is an erased memo in the outer margin next to it. On these marginal notes, see C6 accident note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab 3}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  OTHER MEN WHO PLOUGH THERE PAY 10s. This is an unusual statement; the 10s was presumably a rent but whether for land or for the right to plough is not clear.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 1,9\tab 'CHATSALL'. The form is }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Cesdille }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 here and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Cestulle }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 at 4,23,5. It is also known as 'Chesthill': }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 76. It lay in Wrockwardine Hundred}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. This 'lost' manor was at the meeting point of the township of Moreton Say (in Hodnet Ancient Parish) and Stoke-on-Tern Ancient Parish. It was situated
 in the angle of the Bailey Brook's confluence with the River Tern and included Tern Hill (SJ6332) to the south, Stoke Grange (SJ6331) in the east and part of Helshaw (SJ6329, see 4,8,7 Stoke note) to the south-east. The name was known in the early ninete
enth century as an }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 alias }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 for Stoke Grange: in a series of deeds of the Corbet family of Adderley it is }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Chatsal}{\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Grainge }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
otherwise }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stoke Grainge}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 sometimes spelled }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Chatsale}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 sometimes }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Chatshall. }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 These deeds are in an uncatalogued collection in the Shropshire 
Record Office (call mark 327/1) in boxes 56 and 65. The formula is repeated many times, the first occurrence found by the editors of the Phillimore printed edition of Shropshire being in 1803, the last in 1825. The name may well have ceased to be in curre
nt use many years previously.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab This portion of the manor seems to have been combined with Gerard's part (4,23,5) and to have passed to his heirs. In 1212 it is described (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 147) as an escheat of Gerard }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Thurnay }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 held by Richard }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Chesthull'. }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 It was sold by him to the Abbot of Combermere (in Cheshire, see Knowles and Hadcock,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Medieval Religious Houses}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 107, and 4,15 William Malbank note), the sale being confirmed (with bounds) in a charter of Henry III: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, v. p. 326 no. vii. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 539, the Abbot of}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Cumbremere }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds \'bd}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 fee in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Chethull' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 as a fee of}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Thurney }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and continued to do so until the Dissolution: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 55a; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 113; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 261a; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 227, 237; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 216; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 200; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 311 note 9.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab HE HELD IT. The main scribe of Great Domesday squeezed }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 7 tenuit}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  into a space he had left after the place-name. It was writt
en in the same paler ink and smaller hand that he had used for the six-line addition to the customs of Shrewsbury (see C14 entry note) and probably as an unnamed holding of Robert son of Theobald under Earl Roger (see 4,9,4 entry note).}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 2\tab LAND OF THE BISHOP OF HEREFORD. The lands that became Shropshire lay in two dioceses, those of Chester and of Herefordshire (SHR 1-2).}{\insrsid4139880 
\par \tab \tab The see of Hereford was established in 676 and a cathedral and secular college built there, dedicated to St Mary and later additionally 
to St Ethelbert, decapitated in 794 by King Offa of Mercia. The first bishop was Putta who was translated from Rochester (Kent). The cathedral was rebuilt in stone }{\i\insrsid4139880 c}{\insrsid4139880 
. 825. There was a further rebuilding by Bishop Athelstan after 1012, but it was said to be ruinous when Robert Losinga was made bishop in 1079. He began building an enlarged cathedral.
\par \tab \tab The bishops of the eleventh century were:
\par \tab 1012-1056 Athelstan
\par \tab 1056-1056 Leofgar
\par \tab 1056-1060 Ealdred (who held the bishopric with that of Worcester also 1056-1060)
\par \tab 1061-1079 Walter of Lorraine, chaplain to Queen Edith.
\par \tab 1079-1095 Robert Losinga. (Probably educated in Li\'e8ge; cleric to Edward the Confessor }{\i\insrsid4139880 c}{\insrsid4139880 . 1050.
\par \tab \tab See Knowles and Hadcock, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Medieval Religious Houses}{\insrsid4139880 , pp. 415, 426-27; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\insrsid4139880 , p. 384.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab In addition to the lands given in his fief, the Bishop of Hereford claimed Montford (4,4,23) and had Bayston (4,14,12) restored to him after 1086; see 4,14 12 Bayston note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab The hundredal order of this chapter is as follows:
\par \tab \tab 2,1 "Rinlau" Hundred.
\par \tab \tab 2,2 "Culvestan" Hundred}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 2,1\tab THE BISHOP ... HOLDS ... HE HELD IT BEFORE 1066. Two different bishops are of course meant, Robert Losinga and Walter of Lorraine; see SHR 2 bishop note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab LYDBURY [NORTH]. This was an Ancient Parish. The Domesday form is }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lideberie}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 . It is later called 'North' to distinguish it from Ledbury (Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Liedeberge) }
{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in Herefordshire which was also held by the Bishop of Hereford. It lay in "Rinlau" Hundred in 1086, later in Purslow Hundred. It is not certain when the Church of Hereford acquired the estate. According to Walter Map, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 De Nugis Curialium}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 79-82 it was given to the church by Alnoth, son of Edric the Wild, after he was cured of paralysis.
\par \tab \tab This large manor contained 53 hides and since it lay on the western edge of the county it effectively made its bishop a Marcher lord; a castle, first known as Lydbury Castle, later Bishops Castle, was erected here before 1148: it is }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 castrum Episcopi }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 233 with its church held by the Abbot of Wigmore (see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 167a); on the castle see King, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Castellarium Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 421. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lidebur' Nort }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 contained a number of members surveyed in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 77b-78a. They were: 1 hide at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Castrum Ep'i }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Snellescroft }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(Bishops Castle SO3288 and Snakescroft SO3387); 1 hide at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Linleg' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Linley SO3592), held by the Abbot of Haughmond (see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 163b; the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, nos. 143, 685, 700-22); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 233; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 207); 1 hide in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Norbur'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Herdewyke }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bolle }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Norbury SO3692, Hardwick SO3690 and Bow SO3689; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 234); 1 hide at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Estampton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Witicote}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (Asterton SO3991 and Whitcot SO3791); 1 hide at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Eyton'}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Ploeden }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Walecot' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Eyton SO3787, Plowden SO3786, and Walcot SO3485; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, iv. pp. 233-34); 1 hide at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Cot'dun }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Acliche }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Totterton SO3687 and Oakeley SO3388); 1 hide at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Burhton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Eston }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Broughton SO3090 and Aston SO2991, the latter dependent on Montgomery in 1086: 4,1,35 Aston note; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 233); 1 hide at }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lideburi }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and half of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Brocton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Lydbury and Brockton SO3285); 1 hide in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 La Lee }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and the other half of }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Brocton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Lea SO3589 and Brockton); and 1 hide in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Colebech }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Widebech }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(Colebatch SO3187 and Woodbatch SO3088). On the whole manor, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. pp. 194-225.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 4 SMALLHOLDERS ... 28 SMALLHOLDERS. It is possible that one of these two mentions of smallholders is an error, but a rider also seems to have smallholders (and ploughmen) in 4,1,8 and in CHS 1,1 there is a rider with a villager.
}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab RIDERS. The forms }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 radman}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (singular), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 radmans}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (plural) are from Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 rad-mann}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 (plural }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 radmen}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ). They are very similar to, if not identical with, the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 radchenistre}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (plural }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 radchenistres}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
) which are from Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 rad-cniht}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (plural }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 radcnihtas}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ) and are translated 'riding man' in this edition to maintain the Latin distinction. Like the }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 bouarii}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (1,8 ploughmen note), the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 radmans}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 radchenistres}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 appear almost exclusively in the Welsh border counties in Domesday. The term }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 radman}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  is common in north-western Mercia up to the River Ribble, whereas the term }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 radchenistre}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880  predominates in the south-western Welsh Marches, and also in Hampshire (where only five are recorded). In Domesday Herefordshire both terms are found and appear interchangeable (see HEF 
1,4 riding men note, to which should be added the fact that the 8 }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 radchenistres}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  recorded in 1066 for Leominster, HEF 1,10a, are almost certainly the same as the 6 }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 radmans}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880  mentioned for the same place in 1086). In Shropshire 174 }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 radmans}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  are recorded with 3 }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 radchenistres }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
at Stanton Lacy (7,4) in the south of the county. In more than half the entries which record riders only one rider is mentioned, with two or three in most of the rest of the entries; besides the eight here there are seven at 4,5,14, six at 4,
1,14 and four each at 3c,8. 4,3,30 and 4,27,21.
\par \tab \tab They were of higher standing than villagers, though in Shropshire they are regularly listed after them (but see 4,5,4;13. 4,7,3. 4,27,9;20. 5,9. 6,30. 7,3) and sometimes after, and sometimes before, the smallholders. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Radchenistres}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  are glossed twice as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 liberi homines}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  ('free men') in GLS 1,15 and GLS 19,2, while in WOR 8,9b }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 liberi homines }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and in 8,10a }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 radmans}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  perform similar services. However, they were apparently not allowed to be separated from the manor (se
e HEF 1,4 and GLS 3,1) and they had many obligations. Originally, as their names imply, they seem to have been men who rode with messages or on escort duty, for the king or for their lord (see WOR 2,29 and WOR 2,29 rider note), though they may have had so
m
e military functions, if only defence of the border. They also worked their own lands and those of their lord (see WOR 8,10a, GLS 1,24. HEF 29,4). Here in Shropshire they are several times recorded with ploughs of their own, separate from the villagers' p
loughs: for example, in 4,14,10. 4,15,1. 4,20,7. 4,21,1;5. 4,27,24. 6,33. The }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 radchenistres}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  in 7,4 have land for 2 \'bd
 ploughs and as many ploughs there. In the majority of entries, however, they seem to have a share in the ploughs recorded for the other vill
agers, smallholders etc. They may have had smallholders, ploughmen and even villagers of their own (see 2,1 smallholders note); presumably these or other 'villagers' worked the riders' land when they were absent on duty. They also apparently paid dues: 2 
riders in 4,20,8 pay 2 cattle in dues (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de censu}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ), 7 riders in 4,5,14 pay 20s (though this may be a money rent) and in HEF 1,10a the riding men gave 14s 4d and 3 sesters of honey.
\par \tab \tab For discussion, see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Worcestershire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. pp. 250-51; Maitland, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday Book and Beyond}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 57, 66, 305-308; Vinogradoff, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
English Society in the Eleventh Century}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 69-71; Nelson, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Normans in South Wales}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 44-51; Gwynne, 'Domesday Society in Shropshire', pp. 95-97.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab HALL. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Aula}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 the house in which the owner or lord of an est
ate lived and from which the manor was administered. It has the same meaning as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 curia }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in 3c,8 (3c,8 court note) where a mill also serves (provides grain for) the court. On mills, see 1,7 mill note.}{
\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab A CERTAIN FRANK <OF LYDBURY>. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 311, translates }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 quidam Franco }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
as 'a certain Frenchman' and says in note 10 there 'or perhaps more probably "a free man" '. However, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Franco }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 must be nominative (because of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 quidam}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 )}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and so is far more likely to be the Old German personal name }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Franco }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Forssner, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Continental-Germanic Personal Names}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 92) which occurs several times in Domesday (DEV 28,4. NFK 8,137. YKS 14E33;37;47;51) than an unusual form of}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  francus }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (a hypothetical third declension name,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  franco}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  -onis}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; the term}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  francones homines }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 occurs in WAR 17,27, b
ut there it is an adjective and translated as 'freemen'). The common form for 'Frenchmen' is}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  francigena}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 as in C14 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 passim }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 in Shropshire. Nor is it easy to see how }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Franco }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 on its own could be taken for }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 francus homo }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ('freeman') which the scribe used in 4,
3,24;29 (and compare LIN 26,53 }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 quidam francus homo}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 );}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 see 3c,12 free(men) note. On }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 franc'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (= }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
francus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ) representing }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Franco}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  in an entry in Suffolk, see SUF 48,1 Frank note. The Alecto edition has the personal name Franco.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab His name was written over an erasure, together with }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 ten' de ep'o}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 before it; there is an erased memo in the outer margin next to it. On these erased marginal notes, see C6 accident note.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab }{\insrsid4139880 The name Frank occurs eight times in Domesday Book, representing
 three, or possibly only two individuals. No other Frank held land within 200 miles of the Shropshire holding which was probably therefore the sole possession of its tenant (JP).}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab WILLIAM THE CLERIC. Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 clericus }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 can refer to a lay job or to an ecclesias
tical office, and Great Domesday rarely indicates which is intended. However, although the English word 'clerk' would preserve the ambiguity of the Latin, William is a church tenant holding part of a church and its land, so he is more likely to have been 
a priest or canon. In STS 7 the holders are called the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 canonici }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 of Wolverhampton in the Landholders' List (folio 246a), but both the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 clerici }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 canonici }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in STS 7 itself and the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 presbiteri }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 of Wolverhampton in 12,1. In any case many members of the clergy, be
ing literate, no doubt helped their lay and illiterate lords with the written work necessary in the administration of their lands, so their jobs had both ecclesiastical and lay aspects. William is probably one of the Bishop of Hereford's }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 clerici}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  who witnessed his grant of Holme Lacy (HEF 2,12) and Onibury (2,2) to Roger of Lacy; see Galbraith, 'An Episcopal Land-Grant of 1085', p. 360; and 2,2 Lacy note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab THIS MANOR'S CHURCH. Domesday mentions priests and land attached. On the possibility that this was the minster church for the territory of "Rinlau" Hundred, see \{Introduction: Ecclesiastical Organization\}.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 92 MORE PLOUGHS WOULD BE POSSIBLE. An extreme example of an understocked manor, probably because 32 \'bd}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 hides were waste in 1086; there were only 28 ploug
hs in use. On the two ways of estimating the plough capacity used in Domesday Shropshire, see 1,5 land note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 2,2\tab THE BISHOP ALSO HELD. That is, Walter of Lorraine, but the bishop referred to by 'him' in}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 the next statement is Robert Losinga; see SHR 2 bishop note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ONIBURY. This was an Ancient Parish. It was in "Culvestan" Hundred in 1086, later in Munslow Hundred. For a period the Lacy mesne tenure here seems to have excluded the bishop's overlordship. Roger of Lacy gave the tithes of }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Aneberie }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 to Shrewsbury Abbey (the Shrewsbury Cartulary: Rees, pp. 34, 39), although the abbey was not able to keep them, and there is no mention of the bishop in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 70a (nor in 80b) where }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Walton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Onibur' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Walton SO4679, a member of Onibury), 3 hides, are held by Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
de Lascy }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from the heirs of Walter }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Lascy. }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 On the other hand, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 223, records that }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Onebari }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Walton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 are held from the lords of Ludlow (the Lacys) and by them from the Bishop of Hereford; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 229; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 194; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 55. For the church here in 1086, see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 166b, and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 201.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ROGER OF LACY HOLDS FROM HIM. Bishop Robert's grant of 
Onibury, for Roger's life only, for an annual payment of 20s at Martinmas survives: Galbraith, 'An Episcopal Land-Grant of 1085'. The 20s rent appears here as the 1086 value of Onibury.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 4 WHOLE AND 6 HALF VILLAGERS. Domesday has }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 uillani integri ... dimidii}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
These half villagers may have been men who held half the normal holding of the average 'whole' villager in the area. In Gloucestershire, 38 'half-villagers' occur in four manors; see GLS 67,1 Ampney note on the probability that the average villager, of 
South Gloucestershire at least, held 1 virgate, also Vinogradoff, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 English Society in the Eleventh Century}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 448 and note 3. However, the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 dimidius uillanus }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
in DEV 19,43 and DEV 34,45 was one villager whose (land and) services were divided between two tena
nts-in-chief (brothers) who held in the same village (Ivedon). It is possible that this is the meaning here and that the other 'halves' of three at least of these six villagers are recorded in 7,4, Stanton Lacy, the next holding to Onibury and also held b
y Roger of Lacy, though in chief (see 7,4 half-villagers note). According to Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 4 note 4, the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 dimidii uillani }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
were the same as the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 coliberti}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 i.e. partially enfranchized villagers, but he gives no evidence to support this view; moreover 'half Freemen' (}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 sochemanni}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and 'half priests' occur as well as 'half villagers' in Great Domesday: compare LIN 27,20 freemen note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 COTTAGER. In Shropshire }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 cozet }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 both singular and plural, but elsewhere in Great Domesday the singular is }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
coscet}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , and the plural }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 coscez}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  cozets}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 . These forms, all indeclinable, represent Anglo-Norman versions of Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
cot-seta }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (singular), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 cotsetan }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (plural), 'a cottage-dweller; cottage holder' (Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 cot}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  saeta}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 :}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 English Place-Name Elements }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 under }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 cot-saeta}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 Oxford English Dictionary}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  under }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 cotset}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ). The Anglo-Norman letter }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 z }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 represents the sound }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 ts }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
and the spelling }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 sc }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 a miscopied }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 st }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 representing metathesis of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 ts}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 so }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 coscet }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 = }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 cotset}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 coscez}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  cozets = cotsets}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 The plural in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 -s }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 represented by }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 cozets }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (= }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 cotsets) }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 is the result of either a French adaptation or an Old English change of inflexion, and is the form used in WIL 1,1-15 (JMcND).
\par \tab \tab 'Cottagers' are almost entirely confined
 to the south-west counties in Great Domesday, Wiltshire providing about 80 per cent of the total entries. In Shropshire there are only nine Cottagers recorded: here and in 7,4;6. Not much is known about their status and economic position, though as can b
e
 seen from the few Shropshire entries they are listed after the villagers and either priests, smiths or smallholders and apparently shared ploughs with the other 'villagers'. Some of them at any rate seem to have had land of their own and they may all hav
e shared in the land holding that was ascribed to the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 villani }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 as a class in Exon:}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 DOR 1,8 Cottagers note. A class of person called in Old English }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 cotsetla }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ('cottage-dweller'), which seems equivalent to that of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 coscet}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 has its obligations detailed in the }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rectitudines Singularum Personarum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 pp. 445-46, which dates from the tenth-eleventh century; see DEV 2,24 Cottagers note for a translation.
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Cotarii }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ('cottagers', see 3c,10 cottager note) were apparently a different class: in Domesday Wiltshire, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 coscez }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 cotarii }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 regularly occur in the same entry. The distinction, however, is obscure and what one person called a }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 coscet}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 another might call a }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 cotarius}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 they do not occur together in Shropshire. The }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 bordarii }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ('smallholders': 1,8 smallholders note) also had a
spects in common with the Cottagers. It is interesting that in the Domesday satellite text Bath A (SOM \{Appendix: Bath A\}) }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 coceti }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 are replaced in the corresponding Exon and Great Domesday entries by }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 bordarii}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and it may be suggestive that in Devon smallhol
ders are not recorded on estates which had Cottagers (DEV 2,24 Cottagers note), though they are here. It is worth noting that all the Shropshire occurrences of}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  cozet }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
are on manors held by Roger of Lacy, either in chief or as a subtenant, and it may be that the returns for these manors (all in the same area) were provided by Roger and that he (or his steward or bailiff) designated as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 cozet }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 men who were elsewhere counted among the smallholders; see \{Introduction: Writing and Correction\}. On the whole topic, see Lennard, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rural England}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, pp. 346, 353-54; Lennard, 'Bordars and Cottars'; Finberg, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Tavistock Abbey}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 61-62.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab HE HAS 1 PLOUGH. The manuscript reads }{\i\f710\cf1\insrsid4139880 i c\'e2r'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 . Farley
 omitted the first abbreviation sign which is in error. His practice as regards correcting obvious manuscript errors was varied, however: in 3g,1;5 in}{\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 burgens}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 es}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 tenuit }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 respectively he kept the line above the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 g}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 burgens}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 es}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ] and the abbreviation sign above the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 n}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 tenuit}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  which should have been}{\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 removed by the scribe when he extended these words, but in 4,9 1 (see 4,9,1 Morcar note) he added a}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 sign that was omitted.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 5 VILLAGERS. It is not possible to tell the case of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 uill'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 though it is probably the}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab accusative }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 uill}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 anos}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and is the object of 'he has'. }{
\cf1\lang1036\langfe2057\langnp1036\insrsid4139880 Compare 4,1,19 villagers note, 4,3,29 villagers note, 4,20,8 ploughmen note and 6,11 villagers note. }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 In 4,1,17 scribe B clarified (or corrected) the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 uill'}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880  of the main scribe of Great Domesday to }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 uill}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 an}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 os}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab BEFORE 1066 \'85 9 PLOUGHS. There are only three references in Domesday Shropshire to }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 ploughs; the others are in 3a,1, and in 4,20,4 which lacks all detail for 1086. The inclusion of the number of ploughs on an estate before 1066 is very sporadic in Great Domesday, although the information seems to have been asked for (}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Inquisitio Eliensis}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : Hamilton, p. 97) and it appears regularly in Little Domesday Book. It was probably included in other circuit volumes and then abbreviated out. Leicestershire is 
the only county where the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 ploughs are mentioned in any quantity, though there are a few references in Staffordshire and Northamptonshire which are also in circuit IV. In OXF 6,16 and HEF 29,11 this information was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab NOW 20s. This was apparently the rent paid by Roger of Lacy for holding Onibury: 2,2 Lacy note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3a\tab LAND OF SAINT-REMY'S. }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 This was the cathedral church of St Remigius (Saint-R\'e9my) at Reims (formerly known as Rheims) in the French d\'e9partement of Marne; see Keats-Rohan, }{
\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 524.
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab It is unusual for a foreign church to be found holding English land before the Conquest, but the }{\i\insrsid4139880 Annals of Lapley}{\insrsid4139880 
 appear to give an authentic explanation: Edward the Confessor had intended to 
visit Rome, but in the event sent Archbishop Aldred of York who took with him some English nobles. Among them was Burchard, son of Earl Algar of Mercia, who on his return fell ill and died in Rheims, but not before asking to be buried in the church of Sai
nt-R\'e9my and granting it land out of his patrimony in England. Archbishop Aldred reached England in 1061 and these gifts were subsequently approved by Earl Algar and King Edward; see }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Domesday Studies: Staffordshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 42, and }{\insrsid4139880 STS 5 Saint-R\'e9my note.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab When he rubricated Shropshire, the main scribe of Great Domesday inscribed Saint-R\'e9
my as the holder of chapter 3, probably because its holding was the first and only one in this chapter on folio 252b. However, there are in fact nine churches whose lands f
orm the chapter; for clarity they are here numbered 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d, 3e, 3f, 3g, 3h; 3d contains the lands of two different churches dedicated to St Mary (see SHR 3d St Mary note). He omitted a rubricated heading above the section referring to the lands of
 St Peter's (3b), but he wrote }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 III }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 on}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
the first line of folio 252c (level with the first line of 3b,1) and then erased it, though it is still visible in the manuscript. However, probably when he realized that other churches were the subjects of the chapter,
 he inserted headings ('What the Church of St Milburga [etc.] holds') above the remaining sections 3c-3h inclusive. Chapter 4 in Domesday Cornwall similarly contains the lands of several churches and the main scribe of Great Domesday similarly inserted th
e
 rubricated heading 'Land of St Michael's' at its start, although St Michael's only appeared in the first entry; in the Landholders' List in Cornwall, however, the true state of affairs was recorded as the fourth item is 'The Churches of Various Saints' (
folio 120a).
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 
It is likely that the lands of these nine separate churches formed a single composite chapter, arranged by hundred, in the circuit volume (the likely source of Domesday Shropshire and the other counties in circuit V). At first sight, there is
 little evidence to support this notion in the order of Domesday, though nothing flatly contradicts it. A closer inspection reveals that any previous hundredal arrangement would have been disrupted by two editorial operations carried out by the }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 main scribe of Great Domesday: the order in which he recorded these churches and the order of the entries within them. He arranged the churches in order of importance, beginning with a foreign church (Saint-R\'e9
my of Rheims: SHR 3a), proceeding to Earl Roger's new Benedictine abbey of St Peter (SHR 3b), then to the lands of Wenlock (SHR 3c) which was the largest church in Shropshire, already a priory and attached to the }{\insrsid4139880 Abbey of La Charit\'e9
-sur-Loire. Local }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 churches were then detailed, the first of them (St Mary's of Shr
ewsbury: SHR 3d,1-3;5) probably being the oldest. Compare the order of the similar group of churches in Domesday Cornwall (CON 4 St Michael's note), which the Great Domesday scribe had changed from the order found in his source, Exon. The hundredal order 
w
ithin each section of chapter 3 was distorted by the scribe's putting the most important holding of each church first, generally what it held in Shrewsbury, but thereafter there are no inconsistencies in the order, though it is not the 'standard' order fo
und in several sub-chapters of Earl Roger's chapter 4 (see \{Introduction: Standard Order of Hundreds\}). The order of hundreds in the lands of each church is given in the notes to them in this edition.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab If these churches were detailed in one composite secti
on in the circuit volume, it would explain several of the problems encountered by the Great Domesday scribe, such as the brief omission of a holding of Shrewsbury Abbey (see 3b,4 entry note) and of a holding of St Milburga which was not found until after 
r
ubrication had taken place (see 3c,14 entry note). Likewise a large detail on St Mary's of Bromfield was added (see 3d,7 entry note) as were all of the holdings of St Michael's Church and St Juliana's Church (SHR 3c, SHR 3e). Moreover, the confusion over 
t
he two churches of St Mary (see SHR 3d St Mary note) can best be explained by their being intermingled, as they would have been in a composite chapter, probably with their location only mentioned at the first occurrence, if at all. Finally, chapter 3 as a
 
whole has more corrections in it than other chapters (sub-chapters in the case of chapter 4) in Shropshire, which would have been caused by the need to pick out each church's holdings and probably rearrange the order of these. A study of how the main scri
be of Great Domesday rearranged the composite chapters that he found in Exon and the problems this caused is added proof that chapter 3 was so arranged in his source.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab There seems no reason to think that the churches in 3b-3h were tenants of Earl Roger (so }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 291), rather than holding directly from the king, as the Landholders' List implies (chapter 4 there is the only one dedicated to Earl Roger and his men), despite the fact that the king is not mentioned in 3b-3h (though he is in 3a,1)
. St Michael's is said to hold Poston (3e,1) from the earl, but perhaps this was because St Michael's lay in or very near Shrewsbury castle or because Earl Roger seems to have been its founder. Earl Roger was also closely linked with the churches in 3b an
d 3c, but this does not mean that they were his subtenants. Lewis ('Introduction', }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Shropshire Domesday}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 11) reproduces the view of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  and adds that the absence from the Landholders' List of the churches in 3b-3h 'shows that they did not hold 
directly from the king, but under Earl Roger'. However, their omission was entirely due to the Great Domesday scribe mentioning only Saint-R\'e9my's land when rubricating, as explained above: this was then reproduced in the list.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3a,1\tab A MANOR OF 1 HIDE. The land was at Silvington (SO6279) which was an Ancient Parish.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 74b, for 'Overs' Hundred, Philip }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 le Bret }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 as guardian of the heir of Adam }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Beysin }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 1 hide in 
}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Silveton'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  from}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 the prior }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of Lappele}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lapley in Staffordshire was a dependency of Saint-R\'e9my of Rheims (Knowles and Hadcock, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Medieval Religious Houses}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 86). This was among several manors that Burchard son of Earl Algar gave to Saint-R\'e9my while dying at Rheims; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. pp. 1042-1043; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. nos. 503, 557, vi. no. 168; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 166b; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii. p. 201; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 378.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THERE WERE \'85 2 PLOUGHS. Presumably this refers to 1066; see 2,2 before note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3b\tab [WHAT ST PETER'S [* OF SHREWSBURY *] HOLDS]. See SHR 3a Saint-R\'e9my's note.
\par \tab \tab St Peter's was the Benedictine abbey founded by Roger of Montgomery, first Earl of Shrewsbury. Its monks are mentioned in 1086. Its predecessor, dedicated to St Peter and St Paul, was a small wooden church or chapel, a }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 lignea capella}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, built outside the east gate of Shrewsbury by Siward son of Aethelgar, a kinsman of King Edward (see 4,27,32 Siward note). This church had Boreton and Lowe (3b,5 and 6,5) and the tithes of Upton Magna (4,3,24
 Upton note)as its endowments. Under William I it was administered by Odelerius, a cleric of Earl Roger and father of Orderic Vitalis. Together in 1083 Odelerius and the earl began the building of an abbey dedicated to the same saints; its first abbot, Fu
lcred, came from the monastery of S\'e9es (also founded by Earl Roger }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
. 1087 in Normandy). Roger himself became a monk there three days before his death and was buried there. Siward gave the site of his church for the abbey in exchange for the restorat
ion to him of Cheney Longville (4,27,32) and Odelerius later gave to the abbey 1 hide at Charlton in Wrockwardine (4,1,1 St Peter note). In 1086 eight churches contributed income: Baschurch (4,1,3), Berrington (4,3,14), Corfham (4,1,6), Hodnet (4,1,4), Mo
r
ville (4,1,5), Great Ness (4,1,17), Stottesdon (4,1,30) and Wrockwardine (4,1,1). Before his death Earl Roger gave the churches of Condover (4,1,2), Donington (4,1,25), Edgmond (4,1,23), High Ercall (4,1,21), Tong (4,1,24) and Wellington (4,1,22). This su
g
gests that the church may have been more important than tradition suggests, and might have been a late-Saxon minster church, founded by an ealdorman to complement the episcopal minster of St Chad (3f) and the royal minster of St Mary (3d). Domesday calls 
it a }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 monasterium}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
: 3b,1 monastery note. The abbey's extensive early endowments are recorded in its cartulary: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. x-xi, and nos. 2-3, 34-36 and p. 254). See also Orderic Vitalis, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ecclesiastical History}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  (Chibnall, ii. pp. 415-22); }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii. p. 189; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 163a; Knowles and Hadcock, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Medieval Religious Houses}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 57, 76; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, i. pp. 30-37; Bassett, 'Anglo-Saxon Shrewsbury and its Churches', pp. 13-14; Williams, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The English and the Norman Conquest}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 95; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 523. On Odelerius, see Mason, 'Officers and Clerks',}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 p. 253.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab The hundredal order of this chapter is as follows:
\par \tab \tab 3b,1 [Shrewsbury] Hundred
\par \tab \tab 3b,2 Wrockwardine Hundred
\par \tab \tab 3b,3-5 Condover Hundred
\par \tab It is likely that Shrewsbury Hundred was included first because the church was in the city and had possessions there.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3b,1\tab [IN SHREWSBURY HUNDRED]. See C1 Hundred note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab SHREWSBURY. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 SCIROPESBERIE }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is written in the same size capitals as the}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
manor names. Farley misprinted it the same size as the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 SCIROPESBERIE }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in the first line of}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
the county (C1), though it is unlikely that he thought it was a continuation of the section on the Shrewsbury 'customs' on folio 252a, despite the first three words being the same.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 
MONASTERY. The church founded by Siward is not otherwise said to be a monastery in the strict sense. It could however have been a 'minster', that is a community of secular priests or canons who used their church as a base from which to pr
each and minister in the countryside. See 3b,1 parish note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WHERE THE PARISH [CHURCH?] OF THE CITY WAS. The Latin is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ubi erat parochia civitatis}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  and the meaning is unclear. The word }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 parochia
}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  can stand on its own for 'parish church' (Niermeyer, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lexicon Minus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , under }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 parochia}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
). This is illustrated by an entry in the Tutbury Cartulary (Saltman, p. 63 no. 51) where Henry of Ferrers and his wife Bertha, after granting Marston-on-Dove, Doveridge and West Broughton (all in Derbyshire) continue: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Ad huc autem donavimus parochiam castelli mei}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 ... ('Moreover, in addition, we have granted the parish church of my castle [at Tutbury]'). If that is the meaning intended here, the clause will be describing the position and status of the church on which Earl Roger was basing 
his abbey, referring to the wooden church built by Siward son of Aethelgar: SHR 3b St Peter's note. Because the sense of the word }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 monasterium}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 in the preceding clause is unclear, it could be that this clause is intended to make clear that this was not a monastery in the sense of withdrawal from the world, but a 'minster'.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab However, i}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 t was not the only parish church because Shrewsbury had several parishes. The scribe could have made this meaning much clearer if he had said }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
ubi erat quaedam parochialis ecclesia civitatis}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  ('where there was a parish church of the city'). If, however, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 parochia}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 has its usual meaning of 'parish', then 'where there was a city parish' is also not clear in meaning. Again the scribe could have clarified by saying }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 cui adiacebat quaedam parochia civitatis}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, 'to which belonged a city parish'. Here the tense of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 erat}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 becomes important. Whereas a church might be said to 'have been' if replaced by an abbey, the parish continued to exist; it is represented by some or all of the later Holy Cross parish.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Because the church that preceded St Peter's Abbey was a late foundation (SHR 3b St Peter's note), its parish will have been carved out of some other. Basset, 'Anglo-Saxon Shrewsbury and its Churches', p. 13, takes }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 parochia}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  as 'parish' and further proposes that the rural land that formed part of it was drawn from the land of the church of Ercall Magna.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab See also Fleming, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday Book and the Law}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 224 no.1316.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab FROM HIS BURGESSES. Their houses probably lay in the areas of Shrewsbury called
\par }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab Monkeyate alias Foryate }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Castelforyate }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii. p. 189, that is Abbey Foregate (formerly 'Monk Foregate') and Castle Foregate; see the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, p. 37). They may have been among the 39 burgesses mentioned in C14 as
 having been given by Earl Roger to the abbey.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [HE HAS GIVEN] ... AS MUCH AS PAYS \'a312. In this long sentence }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ded}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 it}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
] ('has given') has two objects: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 monasterium}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  ('monastery')}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 tantum }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
('as much'). It seems that at first 'the abbey', represented by the dative }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 eid}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 em}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ],}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 was said to have been given both the monastery and the render of \'a312, but the scribe transferred the \'a312 to the monks by adding a second dative }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 monachis }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
at the end of the sentence and partially interlined, upsetting its flow in so doing. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Redd' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 could abbreviate }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 reddebat}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 ('paid'), rather than }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 reddit}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  ('pays'), because of the past }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 dedit}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 xii}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  of the render was written over an erasure by the main scribe of Great Domesday; there is an erased memo in the outer margin next to it. On these erased 
marginal notes, see C6 accident note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3b,2\tab EYTON[-ON-SEVERN]. It lay in Wroxeter Ancient Parish and was in Wrockwardine Hundred in}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred, and continued to be held by Shrewsbury Abbey until the Dissolution. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 58a, the Abbot of Shrewsbury holds 9 hides in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Eiton'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 the gift of Earl Roger }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Belem }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (i.e. Roger of Montgomery). It is }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Eyton Abbatis }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  (p. 116) with members }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Aston }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(Aston SJ6109), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Siwaldeton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ('Snalston' in Eyton), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Riston }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Rushton SJ6008),}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Donynton }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Donnington SJ5707, apparently shared with Wroxeter: 4,3,26 Wroxeter note) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Drayton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Dryton SJ5805); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 221, 228; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 260a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii. p. 189; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, viii. p. 279; and 3b,3 Emstrey note. Aston may perhaps have originally been a berewick of Wellington (4,1,22 Wellington note).}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 'Snalston' appears as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Snalston alias Shevalstone}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 in 1655, and was later represented by 'Snalston's Hill', now apparently Charlton Hill (SJ5807): Purton, 'Corselle and Siwaldston'.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab EARL LEOFRIC. One of the three great earls (Siward and Godwin were the others) whom King Canute appointed to govern his kingdom. Leofric was created Earl of Mercia }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 c}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .1018. His wife was Lady (Countess) Godiva. He died in 1057 and was succeeded in Mercia first by his son Algar, then by his grandson Edwin (see 3b,3 Edwin note). Although Domesday names Leofric as the }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  holder
, by which the holder at the death of King Edward is usually meant, it can be assumed that the land remained in his family. Domesday Book does sometimes assign a fief to a holder who was dead, deprived or had gone overseas. There are examples in Domesday 
L
eicestershire, where the fiefs of Earl Aubrey, Countess Godiva and Countess Aelfeva are still listed under their names (LEC 10-12). By 1086, Earl Aubrey had returned to the continent and the two countesses were dead, but the implication is that their fief
s remained intact and had neither been re-granted nor broken up.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab For the suspicion that Earl Leofric's tenure had been illegal, see Fleming, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday Book and the Law}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 224 no. 1317.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 2 FISHERIES. There are 28 fisheries and two 'half' fisheries recorded
 in Domesday Shropshire; see 4,1,16 mill note and 4,4,23 fishery note. Three fisheries are linked with mills with a joint render at 4,1,23 of 10s and at 4,19,2 of 5s and 64 sticks of eels. Five other entries record fisheries and mills together. Apart from
 
these joint renders, eleven and a half of these fisheries paid money dues, four of which may have paid 1,000 eels as well (4,6,5 eels note). The fishery at High Ercall (4,1,21) rendered 1,502 large eels, while one of the fisheries in the present entry was
 
reserved for the monks' supplies. Two fisheries paid nothing (of which one is said to be on the Severn, 4,3,21) and the one at 4,3,24 'pays what it can'. The five at 4,18,2 were rented by the villagers (4,18,2 fisheries note). Four and a half fisheries ar
e entered on their own with no detail of render; this was probably because information on them was incomplete, though some fisheries in Great Domesday definitely paid no dues: HEF 1.4. KEN 5,141.
\par \tab \tab Fisheries were not just areas where fishing was done, but were fixed contrivances for catching fish, whether weirs, 'stake-nets', 'draw-nets' or hatches etc.: Lennard, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rural England}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 248; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Essex}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. pp. 424-25.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THE OTHER IS FOR THE MONKS' SUPPLIES. That is, all the fish coming from it went to feed the monks
 of St Peter's; compare the fisheries in KEN 13,1. HAM 16,5 and HAM 35,4 which were reserved for the lord's hall (i.e. they supplied fish only for the lord's table).}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left two-thirds of a line blank after the fisheries, perhaps for the later addition of other resources, such as woodland, meadow or pasture; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout
\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3b,3\tab EMSTREY. The name means 'minster-church on an island site' (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 123) though nothing is kn
own of any minster there. The estate was, however, held by the minster of St Peter's of Shrewsbury. Emstrey lay in Atcham Ancient Parish. While Atcham was in Wrockwardine Hundred in1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred, Emstrey was in Condover Hundred. The sp
urious foundation charter of Earl Roger to Shrewsbury Abbey (the Shrewsbury Cartulary: Rees, no. 2 p. 5) grants }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Eitona }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Eyton-on-Severn 3b,2), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Eministra }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Emstrey) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Burtona }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Boreton 3b,5). }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Emystre }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is held by the Abbot of Shrewsbury in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 229; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 260a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. pp. 519, 521 (nos. iii and x); Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 170.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab EARL EDWIN. }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 He was the son of Earl Algar and grandson of Earl Leofric. He succeeded his father as Earl of Mercia on his death at some date between 1062 and 1066}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
. He rebelled and made peace with King William at least twice and was finally killed by his own followers }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 1071}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . Although he inherited his father's estates and title, it is Algar who is often said to be the }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  holder.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  See also \{Introduction: History\}.}{
\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab FRENCHMAN. There are 36 }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 francigenae }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
recorded in Domesday Shropshire, including the three 'who serve' in 3g,3 (3g,3 Frenchmen note). As with the Welshmen (4,1,8 Welshmen note) about half appear on manors
 held by Reginald the sheriff. They occur rarely in the western part of the county, being for the most part entered for manors in the central and eastern areas. They always appear among the other 'villagers' and they share the ploughs ascribed to the vill
agers as a whole, except in the cases of 4,3,53 and 9,1 where no ploughs are recorded. However, the Frenchman in 9,1 had a mill. See Gwynne, 'Domesday Society in Shropshire', pp. 93-95.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab PLOT OF LAND. Here Latin }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 masura terrae }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 obviously means a plot of land 
suitable for houses to be built on, rather than the dwelling itself; see C14 messuages note on the varied meanings of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 masura}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 mansura}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}
{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3b,4\tab THIS ENTRY was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday almo
st immediately, as the ink is the same colour as the preceding entries; it is rubricated. Transposition signs link it to the end of 3b,3. Farley did not reproduce these signs as they appear in the manuscript, but as circles with a line emerging on the rig
ht.
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
After this entry the scribe left a space (for some 11 lines of writing) for more details of the holding of Shrewsbury Abbey to be added if necessary. None of this space was used, but he was able to add material in the similar spaces he had left after 
the end of the fief of St Milburga (see 3c,14 entry note); see also 3d,7 entry note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HE COULD GO WHERE HE WOULD. This means that he was free to choose any lord as patron and protector of his land; compare the phrases 'free with this land' in 4,3,6;8 etc. 
and 'he could grant and sell' in 4,3,18. Many holdings were 'tied' to a particular manor (thus, the \'bd hide of the outlier Hopton (4,8,3) could not be separated from its }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 caput }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Stoke-on-Tern) and holders and their lands were often bound to a particular lord, often a church, (for example, Aelfric, the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 holder of Bourton, 3c,8, could not withdraw from the Church of St Milburga, and Edric could not alienate Bayston from the Bishop of Hereford, 4,14,12).}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3b,5\tab BORETON. It lay in Condover Ancient Parish and i
t was in Condover Hundred. Boreton had belonged to the old Church of St Peter and St Paul before 1066 and continued in the hands of the abbey that replaced it until the Dissolution, though not always in its demesne; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii. p. 189;}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 173; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 40; and 3b,3 Emstrey note, 6,5 St Peter note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WITH 1 PLOUGH. So the manuscript. There are several oblique pen-marks scattered over 3b,3;5}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and one of them falls just before the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .i.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 cu' .i. car'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 so that in the Ordnance Survey facsimile and in the Alecto facsimile the }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .i. }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 could be taken for a }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .ii}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3c\tab WHAT THE CHURCH OF ST MILBURGA [* OF MUCH WENLOCK *] HOLDS}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 In 1086 St Milburga's was described as a church (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ecclesia}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ) though it was in fact a Cluniac priory that had recently been reformed from a secular college.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab A monastery at Wenlock was founded before 690 on land (144 }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 manentes}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  including 97 at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wimnicas}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
) bought from Merewald, ruler of the West 'Hani' or 'Hecani', under-king of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Magonsaete }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and brother of King Wulfhere of Mercia, by Aethelheah, the abbot of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Icheanog }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (?Iken in Suffolk). Initially Aethelheah and an abbess Liobsynd governed this double house. Merewald also founded Leominster Abbey in Herefordshire. St Milburga was his daugh
ter and the granddaughter of King Penda of Mercia. In a rather obscure transaction, she seems to have given 60 }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 manentes}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  at a place called }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Homtun}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 in exchange for all 144 hides including }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wimnicas}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (which no doubt encompassed Much Wenlock) and become its abbes
s. The charter quoted in St Mildburg's Testament simply records the grant of 144 by Aethelheah to Milburga, but other details included in the Testament suggest that the story was more complex: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Early Charters of the West Midlands}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 204-206.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The next stages of its history are unclear prior to its destruction by the Danes }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
874. By 901 there appears to have been a minster here dedicated to the Holy Trinity served by secular priests: Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , no. 221; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 436. Earl L
eofric of Mercia is said to have re-founded it as a college of secular clergy some time between 1017 and 1035. About 1080 St Milburga's nunnery appears to have been deserted and, at about that time, Earl Roger 'instituted there a new and strictly monastic
 order of things represented in Domesday by the word 'Abbey' (Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, iii. p. 226), though in fact Wenlock was never an 'abbey' in the strict sense. He also made it a priory dependent on Sainte-Marie of La-Charit\'e9-sur-Loire, between Cosne and Nevers in the French d\'e9partement of Ni\'e8
vre, itself a daughter-house of Cluny; see William of Malmesbury, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Gesta Pontificum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (Hamilton, p. 306), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Gesta Regum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (Mynors, Thomson and Winterbottom, i. p. 268); }
{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 i. no. 358 p. 92. Earl Roger's chaplains held part of the priory's lands (3c,9) briefly between }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 c}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 1074 and 1102: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 291, iii. pp. 7, 18, x. pp. 187-95, 416, xi. p. 35. For a history of the abbey, see Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. pp. 224-27; Knowles and Hadcock, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Medieval Religious Houses}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 97, 101, 416, 433; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 38-46, x. pp. 187-95; Goscelin's }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Life of }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 St}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Milburga }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and that part of it called St Mildburg's Testament which is included in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Early Charters of the West Midlands}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 197-216; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 529; Graham, 'Priory of Wenlock'; Edwards, 'Translation of St Milburga'.
\par \tab \tab Charters recorded a number of these early grants. Several of these charters no longer exist but are deduced from St Mildburg's Testament (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Early Charters of the West Midlands}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, pp. 205-206). In the earliest charter issued between 675 and 690 (Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , no. 1798 = }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Early Charters of the West Midlands}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, no. 404 p. 147) Aethelheah, Abbot of}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Icheanog}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , grants to the nun Mildburg 144 }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 manentes }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in various places including 47 at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Magana}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lydas}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  and 'another place by the River Monnow' (which lay in the area of the later Herefordshire) and 97 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wimnicas }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(presumably near and including Much Wenlock 3c,2). This land he had purchased from the under-king Merewald. The grant of nearly 100 hides at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wimnicas}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 will have included many of the lands mentioned or implied in Domesday.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Between 674 and 704 (Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , no. 1799 = }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Early Charters of the West Midlands}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p
. 147 no. 428) Merchelm and Milfrid with the consent of King Aethelred of Mercia give to their sister Mildburg 63 }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 manentes}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 in various places, some around the hill called Clee, some by the River Corve; some at a place called }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Kenbecleag}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (which has been thoug
ht to be Beckbury: 4,26,5 Beckbury note) and some in Chelmarsh. The lands around the Clee Hill were probably Stoke St Milborough (3c,9) and Cleestanton (3c,13) which between them will have included Clee Downton, Moor, Heath and Norncott. Those by the Rive
r
 Corve were probably Shipton (3c,6), including Larden and Skimblescott, Bourton (3c,8) and Sutton (3c,12). Also included were probably Easthope (4,3,11) and Patton (4,8,4), surrendered in 901 for other lands (see below). Chelmarsh itself was held by Ralph
 
of Mortimer in 1086 (4,11,6) with no mention of any claim by Wenlock Priory, though the abbey held Deuxhill (3c,10) and had held Eardington (4,1,32; see 4,21,3 Millichope note) which were perhaps among the 'some lands' at Chelmarsh, although Eardington, t
hough close, lay the other side of the Mor Brook.
\par \tab \tab In a lost charter of 727-736 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Early Charters of the West Midlands}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , no. 429 p. 148 = Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, no. 1802) Sigward granted to the Abbess Mildburg 3 }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 manentes }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Magdalee }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Madeley: 3c,4). Then in 901 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Early Charters of the West Midlands
}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , no. 430 p. 148 = Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , no. 221), Aethelred and Aethelflaed, rulers of the Mercians, granted to the church of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wimnicas }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Much Wenlock) 10 }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 cassatae }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stantune }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Stanton Long?; see 4,8,6 Stanton note), previously surrendered to the king's lordship, and 3 }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 manentes }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Cahing Laeg }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Caughley; see 3c,2 Wenlock note). In return these rulers were granted 8 }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 manentes }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Easthope }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Easthope: 4,3,11) and 5 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Peattingtune }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Patton; see 4,8,4 Patton note).
\par \tab \tab 
Of Wenlock's early lands, Domesday records that in addition to Eardington (see 4,1,32 St Milburga's note) the church had also held Beckbury (4,26,5), a detached part of Patton Hundred. It also records that Stoke St Milborough was in 1086 in the hands 
of Earl Roger's chaplains; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 291. Earl Roger later gave Millichope (4,21,3) to St Milburga's in compensation for Eardington.
\par \tab \tab The priors of Wenlock gradually consolidated their lands into a Liberty, the contents of which are surveyed in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, ii. pp. 84b-86b. A number of useful acquisitions, such as Willey (4,19,11 Willey note), Oxenbold (4,21,4 Oxenbold note), Wigwig (4,19,13 Wigwig note) and Patton (reacquired: 4,8,4 Patton note) gave the church a continuous belt of 
territory to its south. For the lands of the priory and their value shortly before the Dissolution, see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. pp. 72-73; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}
{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 iii. pp. 215-16.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab The hundredal order of this chapter is as follows:
\par \tab \tab 3c,1-9 Patton Hundred}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 3c,10-11 "Alnodestreu" Hundred}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 3c,12 Shrewsbury Hundred}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 3c,13 "Culvestan" Hundred}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 3c,14 Condover Hundred}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab It seems probable that the holdings in Patton Hundred were placed first as the priory was there, and Much Wenlock was the first manor to be entered in the fief.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3c,1\tab AN ABBEY. Earl Roger re-founded the church }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . 1080, but as a priory, not as an abbey; see SHR 3c St Milburga note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3c,2\tab THE SPACE left by Farley at the beginning of the first line of this entry is due to the large rubricated }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 E }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Eccl'am }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in the line above in the manuscript. Farley similarly included a space at the beginning of the second lines of 2,1 and 4,1,1, but he did not for 1,1. 3d,1. 4,6,1. 4,15,1.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
4,19,1. 5,1.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab [}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 MUCH] WENLOCK. This was an Ancient Parish and lay in Patton Hundred in 1086, later perhaps at times considered a part of Munslow Hundred (see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 84b; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 228) but it formed the core of the great Liberty of Wenlock. The manor continued to be held by the priory until the Dissolution; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 1283; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 164a, 167b; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
iii. p. 215. It will have contained a number of members of which the survey in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 84b-86b (see also pp. 110a-12b) gives }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wonl' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Wenlock), }
{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calweton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Callaughton SO6197), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bradeleg' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Bradeley SO5994)}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Wigewig' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Wigwig, a later addition: 4,19,13 Wigwig note), 
}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wike }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Wyke SJ6402), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Barewe }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Barrow SO6599; see}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 224), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Walton' }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Wenlock Walton SO6398), and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Atterleg' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Atterley SO6497; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, iii. nos. 194, 587). Other lands included in that survey of the Liberty lay sufficiently close to Wenlock manor to have been included in it in 1086. They were:}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Burewardesleg' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Broseley SJ6701; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 503, vi. no. 168, viii. no. 507, x. no. 633; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 228; and 4,21,11 Bosle note);
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Edulleskot }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Arlescott SJ6400; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 224);
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 another}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Bradeleg' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Bradley SJ6301);
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Benethale }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Benthall SJ6602; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 iii. nos. 194, 587, v. no. 611);

\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Posenhale }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Posenhall SJ6501; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 365);
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Ligleg' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Linley SO6898; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  i. no. 801; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, x. p. 350; and 4,19,11 Willey note);
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Kakeleg'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (Caughley}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 SJ6900; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 164a; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 170; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 85a; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 233);
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Presthope }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Presthope SO5897).
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab It is probable that }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Weston' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Weston SO5992), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hopton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Monkhopton SO6293) and }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Mughal' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Monkhall? SO6194, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Monghale Prioris }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, v. p. 77 no. viii; see 4,3,6 Acton note and 4,14,29 Buchehale note) were also in the 20 hides as well; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 39, 43, iii. pp. 223-95; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 42-43; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 304. However, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 373, places these in Oxenbold which was a thirteenth-century grant to the priory.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Caughley was among lands granted by Aethelred and Aethelflaed to the church of Wenlock in 901: 3c St Milburga's note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab EXEMPT FROM TAX. The meaning of}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  quietus }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 here is clear, as in HEF 19,10 and, probably, in DOR 2,6, but elsewhere in Great Domesday it can mean 'free from c
ustomary dues' (as in CHS Rl,3;7 etc. and DEV 3,2) or 'exempt from service' (as in HEF 1,44) or 'undisturbed', 'without interference' (DEV 25,3 attached note. LIN CK67) or 'quit, settled, discharged' (WOR 2,74 discharged note. HEF C14). Exempt hides are a
lso recorded in 3c,3-7;9.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab IN KING CNUT'S TIME. That is, 1016-1035.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab PAID TAX. Great Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geld' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 can abbreviate both the present tense }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geldat }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (plural: }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geldant}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ) or the past imperfect}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  geldabat}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  (plural: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geldabant}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
), or the past perfect }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geldavit}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  (plural:}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  geldaverunt}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ). When the past is meant, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geld'}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  is regularly, but by no means always, accompanied by the phrase }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 T.R.E. }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ('before 1066'). Here the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geld' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
statement is probably governed by 'in King Cnut's time' in the preceding clause. Other Great Domesday counties, such as those in the south-west, invariably have 'Before 1066 it (the manor) paid tax (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geldabat) }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 for }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 n }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hides'. However, as Shropshire has the present participle }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geld}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ans}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ], plural }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geld}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 antes}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ], for the tax statement (see 1,6 pay note), it is possible that }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geld'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  here abbreviates the present tense too and that the remaining 16 hides 'pay tax'.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 2 HEDGED ENCLOSURES. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Haia }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ('hedge') is a Latinization of a Frankish word which gave Old English (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ge}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 )}
{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 haeg }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and Old French and Modern French }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 haie}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . Here it means}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 a 'hay'
 or 'hedged enclosure' into which game were driven for capture. In 4,8,10 and 6,14 they are 'for capturing roe-deer'; see WOR 18,4. They were artificial: according to CHS R6,2 the men from Leyland and Salford made one in the woodland, as did the thanes of
 West Derby Hundred in CHS Rl,40a. The }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 haia }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 at }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Donnelie }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in WAR 16,17 is unusual in having a measurement, \'bd league by \'bd
 league. There are over 80 }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 haiae }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 recorded in Domesday Shropshire for about half that number of places, more than elsewhere in the West Midl
and shires. Several times (for example in 4,1,27. 4,4,20. 4,18,3) they are specifically said to be in the woodland; the three at Longnor (4,3,15) are described as }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 firmae }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
'fixed' or 'solid' (4,3,15 enclosures note). See Ellis, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 General Introduction to Domesday Book}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 114; Du Cange, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Glossarium}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , under }
{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 haga}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  English Place-Name Elements}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. under (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ge}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 )}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 haeg}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  haga.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3c,3\tab TICKLERTON. This lay in the Ancient Parish of Eton under Heywood, Eton having been one of its members in 1086, but later displacing it as the m
anorial centre. Ticklerton was in Patton Hundred in 1086, then no doubt in Munslow Hundred, then in the Liberty of Wenlock, remaining with the priory until the Dissolution. It is not certain when the church of Wenlock acquired it. In }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 85b, the priory holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Eton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Eaton-under-Heywood SO5090; see 3c,4 Madeley note), }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Herton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Harton SO4888), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Tycleworthin }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Ticklerton), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Longefeud }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(Longville-in-the-Dale SO5493) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lussekote }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Lushcott SO5595). It is quite possible that the two previous entries in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hatton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Hatton SO4690) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wlv'eton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Wolverton SO4787), should be included; see Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 311; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 323.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 7 HIDES. The figure }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 vii}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  was squeezed in, probably over an erasure.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab VALUE ... 100s; [***]. The space left between the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 and present values may be for the later insertion of the value of the estate when acquired, although none of St Milburga's estates included the value at this intermediate date. See 3c,4 value note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3c,4\tab MADELEY. This was an Ancient Parish, and lay in Patton Hundred in 1086, then in Brimstree Hundred (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 85a) before being absorbed by Wenlock Liberty. It came into the possession of the church of Wenlock between 727 and 736 when Sigward, a follower of King Ethelbald of Mercia, sold it to Mildburg; see Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , no. 1802 = }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Early Charters of the West Midlands}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 148, 203, 206, 212 no. 429; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 35; and SHR 3c St Milburga note. It was }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Maddeleye }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 228, held by the prior of 
}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wenloc }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Eton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Eton under Heywood: 3c,3 Ticklerton note) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Burghton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(Bourton: 3c,8); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 164a; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 319; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 291, iii. pp. 7, 10, xi. p. 35; and SHR 3c St Milburga note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab VALUE ... \'a34; [***]. The space left between the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 and present values may be for the later insertion of the value of the estate when acquired, although none of St Milburga's estates included the value at this intermediate date. See 3c,3 value note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3c,5\tab [LITTLE] WENLOCK. This was an Ancient Parish. In 1086 it was, like Madeley (3c,4), a projecting or}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
isolated part of Patton Hundred lying north of the River Severn. It is not certain when this estate came into the possession of the church of Wenlock. It may well have been early and included under some other name: SHR 3c St Milburga note. }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Parva Wonl'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  was held by the priory until the Dissolution; see}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 164a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 85a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 215; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iii. p. 324; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 45, xi. p. 80.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 2 HEDGED ENCLOSURES AND A HAWK'S EYRIE. Hawks' nests were regarded as of considerable value and are regularly recorded in Great D
omesday, either in connection with hedged enclosures, as here and in 4,14,4, or on their own, as in 4,8,5; they are particularly well recorded in Cheshire. Hawks are often mentioned as part of a manor's value or render, as in 4,8,16. 4,24,4 (compare 4,27,
4). Where they are commuted for a money render, frequently among a borough's customary dues, the rate seems to have been at least \'a3
10: WOR C2. LEC C4. WIL B2. WAR B4. NTH B36. On the types of falcon, see WOR C2 hawk note. Payments were even made 'for (the upkeep of?) hawks', as in GLS W2.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3c,6\tab 
SHIPTON. This was a chapelry of Much Wenlock, then an Ancient Parish. It was in Patton Hundred in 1086, then in Munslow Hundred, later in Wenlock Liberty. It appears to have come into the possession of the church of We
nlock between 674 and 704: SHR 3c St Milburga note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The holding included }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lav' den' Inferior }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lav'dene Superior }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Larden SO5693); see }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 164a, 167b; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 85b; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 473. It is likely that the next two entries in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , that is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Kilmescot }
{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Skimblescott? SO5892) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Cornee }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Corve SO5993, part of Brockton (4,3,13) in 1086), were also there in 1086; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 303; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 370.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3c,7\tab PERKLEY. Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Petelie}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 It lay in the Ancient Parish of Much Wenlock.}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 This place, which lay in Patton Hundred, has long been regarded as lost, but was identified by Dr. David C. Cox in the course of editing }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Petelia }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 occurs }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . l 102 (Edwards, 'Translation of St Milburga', p. 146), is }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Purteley }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in 1339 (Shropshire Record Office 3320/22/3-4), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pertlie }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 field in 1727 (Shropshire Record Office, uncatalogued 3614) and }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pertley }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 on the Tithe Apportionment. It has no representative in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, probably because it was early absorbed by the adjacent Much Wenlock in which parish it lies; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 83 no. ii; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 328.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab In the Alecto facsimile the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 P}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 PETELIE}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  resembles a }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 B}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
. According to the Editors' note at the end of the Places Index in the Alecto edition of Shropshire (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Shropshire Domesday}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 53), this phenomenon was caused by 'the continuous-tone process of 
reproduction employed for the facsimile ... where the red of the rubrication is either contiguous with or superimposed over the dark browns of the lettering'. In Shropshire similar misreadings of place-names could occur in five other entries there; see 4,
1
,35 Dudston note, 4,11,6 Chelmarsh note, 4,21,3 Millichope note, 4,21,6 Holdgate note and 8,1 Knighton note. They could also occur in two hundred names; see 4,22,1 Leintwardine note and 4,27,27 Baschurch note. The omission of the rubrication of a place-na
me is probably also caused by this phenomenon (4,27,16 Eyton note).}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3c,8\tab BOURTON. This was a chapelry of the Ancient Parish of Much Wenlock, then was itself an Ecclesiastical Parish. It was in Patton Hundred in 1086, then presumably in Munslow, later in Wen
lock Liberty. It appears to have come into the possession of the church of Wenlock between 674 and 704: SHR 3c St Milburga note. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Burton'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 2 hides 3 virgates, belonged to the prior of Wenlock in 1255 (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 85b); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 164a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii. p. 215; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 300; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 420; and 3c,4 Madeley note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab EDRIC. Edric son of Aelfric here and 'Aelfric's son' in 3c,14 were probably the same as Edric of Wenlock; see Mason, 'Edric of Bayston',}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 p. 115; Williams, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The English and the Norman Conquest}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, pp. 92-93. Williams is further inclined to identify him with Edric the wild (4,1,14 Edric note). Edric of Wenlock was one of the witnesses to the grant by the Bishop of Heref
ord of land in Onibury (2,2) to Roger of Lacy: Galbraith, 'An Episcopal Land-Grant of 1085'.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 3 VIRGATES OF LAND. This seems to have been a correction by the }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 main scribe of Great Domesday}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  over an erasure.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab MILL WHICH SERVES THE COURT. Latin }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 curia }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 here means the same as }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 aula}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 ('hall'), that is, the lord's house, the centre of the manor and of his lordship estate. It occurs in an almost identical phrase involving a mill in 2,1; see also 4,20,8 and 4,21,2 and DEV 5,1 mill note for other examples of a mill servi
ng (i.e. providing flour for) the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 curia. }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Compare '2 mills which serve the monks' in 3c,2 and see 1,7 mill note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3c,9\tab STOKE [ST MILBOROUGH]. Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Godestoch }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ('God's Stoke'), referring to its possession by St Milburga's priory. This was an Ancient Parish and lay in}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Patton Hundred in 1086, then in Munslow Hundred and later in Wenlock Liberty. It appears to have come into the possession of the church of Wenlock between 674 and 704: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 383; and SHR 3c St Milburga note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab This large manor had a number of members and in later times seems to have included Cleestanton, separately listed in Domesday (3c,13) and adjacent in "Culvestan" Hundred: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stoke }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Staunton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 are held from the prior of Wenlock in Munslow Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 228. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 85a, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Sthoke }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 at 20 hides includes }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hunton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Cleedowntown? SO5880), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Newton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Newton SO5882), }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bothton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Bockleton SO5783) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Ekinestaneston' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Kinson SO5782). The next three entries in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 85a, were probably part of this manor; they are}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Staunton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Cleestanton 3c,13), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 LaHethe }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Heath SO5585; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 224; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 684, iii. no. 194) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Normonechot }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Norncott SO5686; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. no. 618). These last two lie a little further off to the north, beyond Clee St Margaret; Heath was a detached part of the Ancient Parish of Stoke St Milborough. See }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 164a, 166b; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 6.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab EARL ROGER GAVE IT. He and his successor held it }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 1074-1102; see SHR 3c St Milburga note.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THE CHURCH OUGHT TO HAVE IT. Earl Roger seems to have appropriated this land which was an ancient possession of the church; see Fleming, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday Book and the Law}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 224 no. 1318.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a third of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3c,10\tab DEUXHILL. This was an Ancient Parish, united bef
ore 1535 with Glazehill Ancient Parish. It appears to have come into the possession of the church of Wenlock between 674 and 704, probably being granted as part of Chelmarsh: SHR 3c St Milburga note. It was in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086, probably passi
ng to Stottesdon Hundred before being absorbed by Wenlock Liberty. \'bd hide is held from the prior in}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Dewkeshul' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 85b; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 219; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 295.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 COTTAGER. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Cotarius}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 an inhabitant of a }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 cote }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Old English for cottage), sometimes recorded in Great Domesday as having land of his own (as in MDX 2,2. 3,1: MDX \{Appendix\}
, and in HRT 33,17). In Cambridgeshire (CAM 5,41 cottagers note. CAM 11,3 and CAM 26,34) cottagers who appear in Great Domesday have 5 acres of land each in the corresponding entries in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Inquisitio Eliensis}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  and the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Inquisitio Comitatus Cantabrigiensis}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . This same amount is recorded for the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 cotsetla }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in the }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rectitudines Singularum Personarum }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (see 2,2 Cottager note), and often for the smallholder (1,8 smallholders note), though cottagers with fewer and greater numbers of acres are also recorded in the 
}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Inquisitio Eliensis}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  and the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Inquisitio Comitatus Cantabrigiensis}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  (CAM 5,47 cottagers note. CAM 5,50 cottagers note. CAM 11,4 
cottagers note). On several occasions in Great Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 cotarii }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 are recorded as paying dues or rent, for example, in MDX 4,1 where the rent was for their 'gardens' (}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ortis}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and also MDX 1,3. MDX 3,27. SUS 9,53. SUS 9,64. KEN 5,139.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab In Shropshire there are 15 }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 cotarii }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
recorded on five manors (3c,10. 4,3,2;68. 4,5,9. 4,10,1) in four hundreds. In each case they appear to have a share in the villagers' ploughs. They are listed after the villagers proper (where there are any) and after the
 smallholders except in 4,3,68. There are also 9 'female cottagers' in 7,5, but they are listed separately from the villagers and their ploughs.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Cotarii }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 are very rarely mentioned in Domesday for the West Midlands, though they are numerous in other areas 
of the country, especially in the south and south-west and in Cambridgeshire. This does not mean that they did not exist here, but that they were either included with another class of inhabitants, probably the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 bordarii }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (see 1,8 smallholders note), or that }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 cotarii }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 bordarii}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
if not actually synonymous, had so many aspects in common that the two terms were frequently interchangeable (the foreign term }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 bordarii }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 was eventually completely replaced by the native term }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 cotarii}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ). In the summary of Glastonbury Abbey s lordship holding in Dorset in Exon}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 folio}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 527b4, the 72 }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 bordarii }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 correspond to the 40 }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 bordarii }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and 32 }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 cotarii }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
recorded in Great Domesday for Dorset (DOR 8,1;3); see also CAM 5,34 smallholders note. CAM 5,41 smallholders note. CAM 5,8 and 28,2 have }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 bordarii }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 where the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Inquisitio Eliensis}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880  (Hamilton, p. 101) has }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 cotarii }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 for the same manors, though the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Inquisitio Eliensis}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  Summary (Hamilton, p. 168) has }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
bordarii}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  for those in CAM 5,8 and the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Inquisitio Comitatus Cantabrigiensis }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Hamilton, p. 3) has }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 bordarii}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  for CAM 28,2. The }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Inquisitio Comitatus Cantabrigiensis}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (Hamilton, p. 80) has cottagers for the smallholders of Great Domesday CAM 31,6. The reverse occurs in the corresponding }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Inquisitio Eliensis Breviate}
{\cf1\insrsid4139880  entries for CAM 5,49;51;55;59-63 etc. In Cambridgeshire }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 cotarii }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 are}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
not recorded at all in a group of hundreds in the south-east, though elsewhere in that county they occur, together with }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 bordarii}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
; as this area seems to have been the first to be surveyed, it is probable that personal preference for the term }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 bordarii }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 rather than for }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 cotarii }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
may be the reason. For the Exon}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
evidence on this matter, see DEV 15,21 cottagers note. Likewise in the Berkshire hundreds of 'Blewbury', 'Slotisford', Wantage and Beynhurst, cottagers take the place of smallholders after vil
lagers in the list of population; the first three of these hundreds are adjacent, though Beynhurst is quite separate, so this phenomenon cannot be due entirely to a particular local variation. It is more likely to be the choice of whichever clerk drew up 
the lists for those hundreds: Baring, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday Tables}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 11, 40. Certainly there is no mention of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 bordarii }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in the introductory paragraph to the }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Inquisitio Eliensis}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (Hamilton, p. 97) which purports to list the Commissioners' questions, while }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 cot' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (or }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 cothcethle }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
in one version) is mentioned there after the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 villani }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 where the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 bordarii }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 usually occur in Great Domesday.
\par \tab \tab In Shropshire, however, cottagers and smallholders do appear to be separate categories, at least as far as this entry and those at 4,3,68. 4,5,
9 and 4,10,1 are concerned. Other counties in Great Domesday also regularly record smallholders and cottagers in the same entry, though cottagers are not mentioned in every county. There probably were differences between the two classes, though perhaps on
ly of wealth. The }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 bordarius }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 seems to have had slightly more land and ploughs than the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 cotarius }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
who may sometimes only have owned nothing more than his cottage, though there was much overlapping and the distinction between the two terms may have only grown up gradually and not to have been universally accepted.
\par \tab \tab The Cottager (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 coscet}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 also had several aspects in common with the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 cotarius }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
and may have been regarded as identical sometimes; see 2,2 Cottager note.
\par \tab \tab On these population categories, see Lennard, 'Bordars and Cottars'.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3c,11\tab PICKTHORN. It lay in Stottesdon Ancient Parish and was in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086, then in Stottesdon Hundred, later in Wenlock Liberty. It is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pikethorn }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 85a; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 164b; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 218, 231; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 921, ii. no. 595; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 230.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3c,12\tab SUTTON. It was an Ancient Parish, later in Meole Brace parish a
s part of Shrewsbury Liberty. It was in Shrewsbury Hundred in 1086 and is mentioned in the 100 hides of Shrewsbury (C13). It appears to have come into the possession of the church of Wenlock between 674 and 704: SHR 3c St Milburga note. It is }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Sutton' prope Salop' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ('near Shrewsbury') in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 85b; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 164b; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii. p. 215; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v. pp. 78, 81; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 363. It is no doubt called 'south }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 tun}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ' by r
eference to Shrewsbury.
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab }{\i\insrsid4139880 Sudtone}{\insrsid4139880  was written by the}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  main scribe of Great Domesday}{\insrsid4139880  over an erasure.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 HIDE. [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the rest of the line, measuring about an inch to the side ruling, after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 i hida.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see 1,5 hide note.}{
\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab FREE[MEN]. Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 homines ... francos}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 In this edition }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 francus homo 
}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is translated 'freeman' to distinguish it from }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 liber homo}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
translated here as 'free man'; the difference between the two terms is unclear, however. In the Alecto edition it is translated as 'free man'. In Medieval Latin }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 francus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 can mean both 'free' and 'French' depending on the context and can be used as a noun ('a Frenchman'). To avoid possible confusion }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 francigena}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 is available for 'Frenchman', but is rather grand, like }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 angligena}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  for }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 angli}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  when there is no possible doubt about the meaning of }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 angli}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . The main scribe of Great Domesday evidently attempted to use }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 francigena}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  for 'Frenchman' and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 francus
}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  for 'free'. There seems to be no unequivocal case where }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 francus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  means 'French' or Frenchman. In the present context the use of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 homines
}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 francos}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 rules out the possibility of 'French' and it is also unlikely because of its contrast with villagers who do not seem to have been free in every sense (Maitland, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday Book and Beyond}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, pp. 41-52). However, Maitland (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ibidem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 46 note 1) suggests that in 4,3,24 }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 francus homo}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  is an equivalent of }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 francigena }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 because in 4,3,23 a Frenchman is listed. However, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 francigena }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is the term invariably used, in Shropshire at least, for '
Frenchman' and in the examples Maitland quotes in his note the '}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 francos}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 '}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of MDX 2,1 (a very similar phrase to the one here) and '}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 francus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 '}{\i\cf1\up6\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of WIL 26,3 are both }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 franc' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
in the manuscript which is more likely to abbreviate}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  francigena}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 s}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ],}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
the 'lightning' sign used very rarely abbreviating }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 -os }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 or }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \endash us.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 Those two examples are translated by 'Frenchmen' and 'Frenchman' respectively in this edition, as also in the Alecto edition. On the two meanings of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 francus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , see Freeman, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Norman Conquest}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v. Appendix. Note E; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Middlesex}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. pp. 90-91.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3c,13\tab 
CLEESTANTON. It lay in the Ancient Parish of Stoke St Milborough. It lay in "Culvestan" Hundred in 1086, then in Munslow Hundred and later in Wenlock Liberty. It appears to have come into the possession of the church of Wenlock
 between 674 and 704: SHR 3c St Milburga note. In the Middle Ages it was often counted as a part of Stoke St Milborough (3c,9) and called }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Stanton}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Staunton }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 or }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 La Cleye S'ce Milburge}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 :}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 166b. It had been subinfeudated by }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . 1200 and Wenlock's overlordship was gradually lost: Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, v. p. 111. Cleestanton had probably once formed a single land-unit with Clee St Margaret (4,21,2): }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 88.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 2 HIDES. [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a gap suitable for some five letters after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hid\'ea}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 see 1,5 hide note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a third of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3c,14\tab THIS ENTRY was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday in a space left at the end of St Milburga's fief. He used a paler ink than he had used for the preceding text and
\par \tab the entry was not rubricated, so was a late addition. It was done at
 the same time as the other unrubricated additions in Shropshire: 4,1,33-34. 4,12,1. 6,28;32. 7,2. The ink is very similar in colour to that used for both the unrubricated entries in Bedfordshire, for one in Northamptonshire and for most of those in Derby
s
hire (BDF 24,11. 53,22. NTH 57,3. DBY 1,17. 6,100-101. 10,4. 16,3-8. 17,22-23), suggesting that he amassed several items for inclusion before adding them. However, the writing is more formal in the Shropshire added entries. Three of the seven unrubricated
 additions are for places in Condover Hundred. Very unusually for an unrubricated entry, he included the hundred head (written in a space at the end of the preceding entry), perhaps because the location of this \'bd
 hide holding was unavailable. The only other
 occurrence of this is in Leicestershire (see LEC 1,12 entry note), but see HAM 5a fief note and, for the inclusion of one by scribe B, see CAM 1,22 entry note. See also SHR 3e fief note, SHR 3h fief note and 4,1,34 entry note.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ST [MILBURGA]'S. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 WITBURGA }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is obviously a mistake for}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  MILBURGA }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
as the descent of the land proves, as does its tenancy by Aelfric's son (presumably Edric: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 313 note 14) who was St Milburga's tenant at Bourton (3c,8 Edric note). The source of this late addition was probably faulty; see also 3c,14 \'bd hide note. There was a St Withburga who died in the mid-eighth century, some years after St Milburga.
}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \'bd}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 HIDE. This unnamed land was probably Hughley (SO5698), an Ancient Parish. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 85b, \'bd}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hide in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Leg'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
formerly in Condover Hundred, is held by Hugh }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Leg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from the prior of Wenlock; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Leye }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is associated with }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Presthope }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Presthope: 3c,2 Wenlock note) in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 228, and is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Huglye }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii. p. 216. See Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 302; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 313 note 14, x. p. 233. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, x. p. 337, suggests that this might be the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lingen}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  alias }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Liya}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 given by King Coenred of the Mercians to the nun Feleburg between 704 and 709 (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Early Charters of the West Midlands}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 139 no. 405 = Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , no. 1801) and which she subsequently gave to the church of Wenlock. However, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Liya}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 may well be the Lye that is near Lingen, both of which are now in Herefordshire (6,14 Lingen note; 6,16 Lye note).}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab FROM IT. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de eo}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  in error for }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de ea}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : the feminine }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ea}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  is needed}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 to agree with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Sancta Witburga}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3d\tab WHAT THE CHURCH OF ST MARY HOLDS. At some stage in the Domesday process two separate returns, one concerning St Mar
y's Church of Shrewsbury (3d,1-3;5) and one from St Mary's of Bromfield (3d,4;6-7) have become amalgamated. If, as suggested in SHR 3a Saint-R\'e9
my's note, the holdings of the two churches were part of a composite chapter on churches in Shropshire in the cir
cuit volume, it is likely that the identifying location of each only appeared once, if at all. That the main scribe of Great Domesday had problems with the lands of St Mary's of Bromfield is suggested by most of 3d,6 being corrected over erasure and 3d,7 
being a later addition and also corrected over erasure; see 3d,6 now note and 3d,7 entry note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab St Mary's of Shrewsbury was traditionally said to have been founded by King Edgar (957-975) who established secular canons there. In reality, it was probably a middle Saxon foundation, perhaps a minster for the }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Magonsaete}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 and, with St Chad, one of the two senior churches in Shrewsbury. Its parish lay in the northern part of the promontory on which Shrewsbury was built, and it had further land, north of the River 
Severn. It seems probable that the parishes of St Juliana, St Alkmund and St Michael were carved out of it. If not founded by King Edgar, it probably had a royal origin and had become a royal free chapel by the thirteenth century; see }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 119-23; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 1464; Knowles and Hadcock, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Medieval Religious Houses}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 418, 438, 482; Bassett, 'Anglo-Saxon Shrewsbury and its Churches', pp. 7-8; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 530.}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The minster Church of Bromfield was of pre-Norman origin, certainly founded before 1061, and probably, in view of its extensive and uninterrupted }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 parochia}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , much older: \{
Introduction: Ecclesiastical Organization\}. It had been granted extensive liberties by Edward the Confessor (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Early Charters of the West Midlands}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 150 no. 433 = Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , no. 1162), had 12 canons and had enjoyed considerable estates, although 10 hides of Bromfield (3d,7) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Chinbaldescote }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(4,20,21) had been lost to the church by 1086. In 1086 it was a secular college containing canons, and from 1115 it was a Benedictine priory. It was annexed to Gloucester Abbey in 1155; see the Gloucester Cartulary (Hart, pp. 214-14); }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 155; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. pp. 207-208; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Early Charters of the West Midlands}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 150 no. 433; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 18, 27-29; Knowles and Hadcock, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Medieval Religious Houses}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 52, 61, 112, 116, 468; Keats-Rohan, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 530; Harmer, 'A Bromfield and a Coventry Writ'; Blair, 'Secu
lar Minster Churches', pp. 128-31. On the relation of this church to the Hundred of "Culvestan" and to the other minster churches of Shropshire, see \{Introduction: Ecclesiastical Organization\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab The hundredal order of this chapter is as follows:
\par \tab \tab 3d,1-2 Baschurch Hundred (St Mary's, Shrewsbury)
\par \tab \tab 3d,3 Shrewsbury Hundred (St Mary's, Shrewsbury)
\par \tab \tab 3d,4 'Overs' Hundred (St Mary's, Bromfield)
\par \tab \tab 3d,5 Baschurch Hundred (St Mary's, Shrewsbury)
\par \tab \tab 3d,6-7 ["Culvestan"] Hundred (St Mary's, Bromfield).
\par \tab It is probable that the largest manor of St Mary's of Shrewsbury (at Broughton) was entered first, as that church is recorded as having nothing in the city.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3d,1\tab BROUGHTON. Broughton was a chapelry of the Ancient Parish of Shrewsbury St Mary, then was itself an Ancient Parish. It lay in}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Baschurch Hundred in 1086, later in Pimhill Hundred, Broughton itself being held by St Chad's Church (3f,5). This holding actually lay at }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Cleve }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Sansall }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Clive SJ5124 and Sansaw SJ5023), which were likewise part of the Ancient Parish of Shrewsbury St Mary and are now in the Civil Parish of Clive. The }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pimhill Hundred Roll}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 121, states that they were held by the Dean and Canons of the Church of St Mary, Shrewsbury, in free alms from the king; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 75a.
 These lands still lay in the parish of St Mary, Liberty of Shrewsbury, in the nineteenth century; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 160; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 313 note 15; and 3d, 2 Astley note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab A PRIEST. He was probably a canon of St Mary's, Shrewsbury.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3d,2\tab ASTLEY. The Domesday form is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hesleie.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  It formerly lay in the Ancient Parish of Shrewsbury St Mary and is now a separate Civil Parish. It was in}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Baschurch Hundred in 1086, then in Pimhill Hundred and Shrewsbury Liberty. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Estleg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 was held by t
he Dean and Canons of St Mary's, Shrewsbury, as 3 hides of the King's Chapel in Shrewsbury in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 75b; it is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Astleye }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 coupled with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Klive }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (3d,1 Broughton note) in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 230; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Pimhill Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 121, and Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 157.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab A PRIEST. He was probably a canon of St Mary's, Shrewsbury.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3d,3\tab MEOLE [BRACE], RALPH OF MORTIMER'S MANOR. This 1 virgate is mentioned among the}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 100 hides of the City of Shrewsbury in C13. Ralph of Mortimer's manor was 
Meole Brace (6,33), an Ancient Parish.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3d,4\tab IN 'OVERS' HUNDRED ... \'bd HIDE. It appears that this land, like 3d,6 Bromfield, was a}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
possession not of St Mary's of Shrewsbury, but of St Mary's of Bromfield. It lay at Lower Ledwyche (SO5374) in Ludford which was formerly a chapelry of Bromfield, then a separate Ancient Parish. It is the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Presteledewych' }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 held by the prior of Bromfield from the king in 'Overs' Hundred in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 74b; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 155, 157; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii. p. 155; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 377; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 313 note 16. For Upper Ledwyche, see 4,14,22.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3d,5\tab 
MYTTON. It lay in Fitz Ancient Parish.. It was in Baschurch Hundred in 1086. It would seem that the 1086 tenant Picot (of Say) alienated it from St Mary's of Shrewsbury and incorporated it in his own manor of Fitz (4,20,15), since it soon ceased to be an 
independent manor: Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 156. Picot likewise appears to have alienated }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Chinbaldescote }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
from the Church of St Mary of Bromfield (4,20,21 Chinbaldescote note).}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab PICOT [* OF SAI *]. Picot here may be the same as Earl Roger's subtenant of that name, who may have come from Sai, see 4,20 Picot note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a third of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab NOW IT IS AT A REVENUE FOR 11s. In Domesday Book}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  firma }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 has several meanings (see also 4,1,12 revenue note and 4,8,8 revenue note), but here the phrase }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ad firmam pro }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 seems to mean that the manor was being held at a revenue, i.e. for a money rent, that it was being 'farmed'. Under this system the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 firmarius }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 or 'farmer' (here probably the subtenant Picot) agreed to pay a fixed sum of money annually to the king, the sheriff, or the lord of the manor (here St Mary's Church) which he hoped he would more than recov
er from the rents and dues he received from that manor as well as from the profits of the lordship. Other examples in Shropshire of land being held in such a way include 4,4,8. 4,25,4. 4,26,7. 4,27,5;30. 6,31, and see 4,5,14. 4,16,1. 4,26,5. 4,27,4. Occas
i
onally the villagers themselves 'farmed' a manor: perhaps the men in 4,26,7. 4,27,30 and 6,31 who paid so much 'in revenue' and the Welshman in 4,27,4 who paid a hawk in revenue fall into this category, though it is possible that they merely paid a rent f
or a holding. See Lennard, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rural England}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 105-75, especially pp. 153-54; Hoyt, 'Farm of the Manor'; and DEV 6,6 villager note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3d,6\tab [IN "CULVESTAN" HUNDRED]. This hundred head is supplied from geographical probability and from the later history of the manor (3d,6 Bromfield note).}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 
BROMFIELD. This was an Ancient Parish. It was probably in "Culvestan" Hundred in 1086, later in Munslow Hundred. As in 3d,4 St Mary's of Bromfield has become confused with St Mary's of Shrewsbury; see SHR 3d St Mary note; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 313 note 17. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 225, the prior of}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Bromfeld }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bromfeld }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 with members from the king; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 229; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 70a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 163b, 166b. One of these members was }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bromfeld Parva }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 223 ('Little Bromfield': }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lay Subsidy Roll (1334)}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 254; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 220), also called }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bromfeud Simonis }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 70a ('Simons' Bromfield). Other members were probably }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Acley }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 or }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Okeleye }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Oakly Park SO4876) held by Simon }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Halton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 70a and in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 223, and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 West Halhton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 or }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Halecton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Lady, Hill and Priors Halton SO4775, SO4875, SO4975) in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 70a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 223. The charter of Henry III given in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 155 (no. ii) includes lands at }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Haverford }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Halford SO4383); }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Dudingehope }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(Upper and Lower Dinchope SO4583, SO4584; see 4,20,21 }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Chinbaldescote }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 note); }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Efford }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (perhaps Ashford Bowdler, in Herefordshire); }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feltune }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Felton and Clayfelton SO5076); }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Burgeheye }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Burway SO5075); }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lethewic }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(Lower Ledwyche; see 3d,4 hide note) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Halentone }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Halton, see above); see also the Henry VIII survey in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 155; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 207; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 27. In 1155 there were prebends from Burway, Pontesbury, Felton, Halford, Dinchope, Ashford Bowdler?, Lower Ledwyche and Halton: }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 the Gloucester Cartulary (Hart,}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  pp. 214-14).}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Halford (including Dinchope) is now a separate parish, but was formerly a detached part of Bromfield Ancient Parish.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab IS SITED THERE. Domesday has }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ibi consistit. }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Thus the church stands at Bromfield not in Shrewsbury; see SHR 3d St Mary note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab NOW ... MANOR. Almost all of this entry (2 \'bc lines) was written by the main scribe of Great Domesday over an erasure, perhaps at an early stage. He had probably written the details of another holding here.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3d,7\tab THIS ENTRY was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday in a space original
ly left after this fief, probably at the same time as the fiefs of St Michael's Church (immediately below it: SHR 3e) and of St Juliana (at the foot of the column opposite: SHR 3h). The writing is compressed in all three additions and slopes upwards here.
 Almost a whole line (from }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 totu}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 m}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ] in the first line to }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 teneb}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 at}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ] in the second line was written over an erasure. On a possible indicator as to when this entry was added, see 3d,7 land note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HAD THE WHOLE. This corrects the 'held' of the Phillimore printed translation.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 
SPIRTES ^[THE PRIEST]^. In this entry he is called a canon, but elsewhere in this county he is called Spirtes the priest (4,20,18. 9,1). He was a wealthy churchman who had held a total of over 80 hides in Shropshire, Herefordshire, Wiltshire
, Somerset and Hampshire. He had been a favourite of King Cnut\rquote s sons Harold and Harthacnut; see }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hearne, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hemingi Chartularium}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
p. 254, and Worcester G8 (in WOR \{Appendix\}) which also mentions his expulsion from England (by King Edward) for an unknown reason. He had also held some land from St Alkmund's (9,1).}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ROBERT SON OF WIUHOMARCH. He was the father of Swein, the sheriff of Essex, and is also probably to be identified with Robert of Moyaux (in the French d\'e9partement of Calvados, canton Lisieux). Apparen
tly a Norman by residence, but having a father or a mother with a Breton name, he held land under Edward the Confessor, was his staller and a close counsellor. He is said to have sent news of the battle of Stamford Bridge to William, then Duke of Normandy
, to whom he was apparently related. He was sheriff of Essex under William and was succeeded by his son Swein. The exact dates are unclear, and it is possible that Robert relinquished the shrievalty in favour of his son before his death; see Green, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 English Sheriffs}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 39. Robert is recorded as dead in ESS 24,59 and it is most likely that he had died before or during the conduct of the Domesday Survey and been succeeded in his lands by Swein. If Robert son of Wiuhomarch is the same as Robert the constable (u
nless Robert son of Ivo, also a constable, is meant) who appears in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Liber Exoniensis }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (both in the main entry, Exon folio 266a3, and in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Terrae Occupatae, }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Exon folio 510a6) and in SOM 19,7 as holding Crowcombe in 1086, then he is there recorded as still living. The same might apply to the present entry; see 3d,7 holds note. This apparent discrepancy may be explained if Robert
\rquote s death took place during the Domesday Survey and the Essex returns were later than those for the south-western circuit, or wer
e updated to take account of this fact (Robert being a local lord of importance), or the news had not had time to travel to the west. See }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Huntingdonshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. pp. 335-36; Harmer, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Anglo-Saxon Writs}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 571; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 393, 424.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The Domesday forms of this name - }{\i\insrsid4139880 Wimarc}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Wimarch}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Wimarc}{\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\insrsid4139880 a}{\insrsid4139880 )}{
\i\insrsid4139880 e}{\insrsid4139880  (genitive), }{\i\insrsid4139880 Wim'}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Wicmarc}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Witmarce}{\insrsid4139880  (genitive), and, for 1086 holders, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Wihomarc}{
\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Wihumar}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Wihumarc}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Wihunmard}{\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\insrsid4139880 us}{\insrsid4139880 ], }{\i\insrsid4139880 Guihu'mar'}{\insrsid4139880 
 - represent Old Breton }{\i\insrsid4139880 Wiuhomarch}{\insrsid4139880 , which is both a masculine and feminine name: von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\insrsid4139880 , pp. 349-50, 415; Tengvik, }{
\i\insrsid4139880 Old English Bynames}{\insrsid4139880 , p. 231; Reaney, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Dictionary of British Surnames}{\insrsid4139880 , under Wymark. The Phillimore printed edition has the 
forms Wymarc, Wiuhomarch, Wihomarch; these have now been standardized as Wiuhomarch. The Alecto edition has Wimarc (for Robert son of Wiuhomarch), but generally reproduces the Domesday forms for the 1086 holders, except for Wymarc in Norfolk.}{
\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab AS IF TO A C
ANON. Robert was not a canon, but King Edward gave Spirtes' forfeited hides to him as he might (and probably ought to) have done to a canon. If the main scribe of Great Domesday had wanted to imply Robert was a canon (so Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 209), he would either have omitted the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 sicut }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 altogether or put }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ut }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in its place.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab SON-IN-LAW. According to Eyton, 'Robert Fitz Wimarch', p. 5, this was Richard Scrope (SHR 5 Osbern note), but he does not provide any evidence to support this assertion; the identification is unlikely.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab TO BE RETURNED. The Alecto edition has 'revert'. Latin r}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 everti}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , the passive infinitive of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 reverto}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 and the infinitive of the derived verb }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 revertor}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , can have these and several other meanings. On this, see Fleming, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday Book and the Law}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 224 no. 1319. She translates 'he immediately ordered that the land ought to be returned to the church', but there is no word for 'ought' in the Latin.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab COULD COMMAND. That is, he was expecting to see Robert at the Christmas court.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THE KING HIMSELF DIED. That is, on 5th January 1066.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab NOW ROBERT HOLDS IT FROM EARL ROGER. It is not certain which Robert is intended. Robert son of Wiuhomarch may have been dead by 1086 (certainly his son Swein was in possession of his lands and shrievalty in 
1086 (see 3d,7 }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wiuhomarch}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  note) though the most obvious emphasis of the Latin is that Robert son of Wiuhomarch had held this land by gift of King Edward, but now (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 modo}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ) holds it under Earl Roger. However, Robert might be the name of Robert son of Wiuhomarc
h's son-in-law (and therefore perhaps the Robert who was a tenant of Robert's son, Swein, in Essex), or possibly one of the Roberts (Robert son of Corbet, Robert son of Theobald, Robert the butler) who hold under Earl Roger.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab A Robert (of Stratford) also holds from Swein in SFK 27,9.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 
LAND FOR 54 PLOUGHS. This formula for the plough estimate was not used by the main scribe of Great Domesday as much as the other formula (how many ploughs would be possible) at this point in the text; see 1,5 land note. It ma
y be an indicator as to when this entry was added, as it has this formula (as do 3e,1-2. 4,1,33. 4,3,71. 4,9,4 and 4,12,1, all additions), whereas only 43 other entries up to 4,14 have the 'Land for' formula, compared to over 250 after it. Other added ent
ries and chapters in Great Domesday Book contained differences in formulae, layout or content compared to the adjacent text; see LEC 1,12 entry note.
\par \tab \tab The use of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Int}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 er}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ] }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 tot}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 um}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ] ('in total') implies that this estimate was for the whole of the manor of Bromfield; the preceding entry (3d,6) lacks a plough estimate.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3e\tab THIS FIEF was a later addition by the main scribe of Great Domesday in a space he had left after the lands of St Mary's Church (SHR 3d). It was entered at the same time as the fief of St Juliana
 (SHR 3h) and probably as an insertion on Bromfield (see 3d,7 entry note). As was the case with many other added fiefs and entries (especially unrubricated ones; see 3c,14 entry note), he failed to include the hundred head. On a possible indicator as to w
hen this fief was entered, see 3d,7 land note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WHAT ST MICHAEL'S [* OF SHREWSBURY *] HOLDS. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 QD' TENET SCS' MICHAEL'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; Farley printed }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 SCI'}
{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  in error and omitted the (albeit small) abbreviation line through the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 L}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 MICHAEL'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 
In 1086, St Michael's was a secular college, containing canons. The church lay in or immediately adjacent to the boundary of the castle at Shrewsbury. Its small parish appears to have been carved out of that of St Mary's of Shrewsbury: SHR 3d St Ma
ry note. It may have been founded by Earl Roger, or possibly earlier in the Conqueror's reign by William himself. By the twelfth century it was a royal free chapel, known as the King's Chapel, and was later granted by Henry IV to his college of Battlefiel
d (founded in 1409); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. pp. 1426, 1464; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 291; Knowles and Hadcock, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Medieval Religious Houses}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 418, 438; Bassett, 'Anglo-Saxon Shrewsbury and its Churches', p. 13; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 533.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab The hundredal order of this chapter is as follows:
\par \tab \tab 3e,1 ["Culvestan"] Hundred}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 3e,2 [Hodnet] Hundred}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3e,1\tab [IN "CULVESTAN" HUNDRED]. A hundred head is clearly missing here at the start of this fief. It is assumed to be "Culvestan" from the later history of Poston (3e,1 Poston note).}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [LESSER] POSTON. Lower or Lesser Poston was a township and chapelry of the Ancient Parish of Hopton Cangeford. For Upper or Greater}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Poston, see 4,21,17. It probably lay in "Culvestan" Hundred in 1086, later in Munslow Hundred
. Lesser Poston was given to the Church of St Michael by Earl Roger, but escheated to the crown on the fall of Earl Roger's son. It was later held by the Fitz Alan barony. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 70a, Richard }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Thonglond }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \'bd hide in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Possethorne }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
from John Fitz Alan; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 206; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 239; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 167.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab LAND FOR \'bd PLOUGH. On this plough estimate formula, see 3d,7 land note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab FOR IT. Domesday has }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 inde}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 which literally mean
s 'from it', suggesting that the box-wood actually came from the 1 virgate of land in Poston. But since the box-wood is clearly a render, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 inde }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is probably been loosely used to mean 'for it'.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3e,2\tab [IN HODNET HUNDRED]. This head needs to be supplied because of the geographical position and later history of Soulton (3e,2 Soulton note).}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab SOULTON. This was a township of Wem Ancient Parish. It was apparently in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 220, Ivo }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Soleton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Soleton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from Robert }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Corbet }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
who holds from the King's Chapel in Shrewsbury Castle; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 55a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 118; Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 12; and 4,10,2 Lacon note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab BRICTRIC. Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Brictric }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 represents Old English }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Beorhtric}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab LAND FOR 1 PLOUGH. On this plough estimate formula, see 3d,7 land note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3f\tab WHAT ST CHAD'S [* OF SHREWSBURY *] HOLDS. St Chad's lay in Shrewsbury and in 1086 was a episcopal college, }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 that is the private property of the bishops of Lichfield (or of Chester from 1075),}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  containing canons. It was dedicated to Ceadda, the}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
first Bishop of Lichfeld (669-672), but its date of foundation is uncertain. Its parish occupied the southern half of the promontory on which Shrewsbury was built and it
 also possessed lands south of the River Severn. It seems probable that St Chad's and St Mary's were the two most ancient churches in Shrewsbury. St Chad's was possibly established as the minster for the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wreocensaete}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  and subsequently became a
 possession of the Bishops of Lichfield. There is some evidence that it had the right to collect church-scot, a due associated with important minster churches. The link with Lichfield (the Bishopric of Chester in Domesday: SHR 1 bishop note) makes the exa
ct tenure of some manors unclear. Thus, 1 \'bd}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
hides are said to be held by St Chad's in Shrewsbury in C13, but are said to be held under the Bishop of Chester (at Shelton) in 1,4. Wrentnall (4,26,3) had been lost to the church before 1086, and possibly also W
elbatch and Woodcote (4,4,1. 4,5,8) from which it received the tithes; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 114-19; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, vi. p. 1463; Knowles and Hadcock,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Medieval Religious Houses}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 418, 438, 482; Bassett, 'Anglo-Saxon Shrewsbury and its Churches', pp. 3-7; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Domesday People}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 531.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab The hundredal order of this chapter is as follows:
\par \tab \tab 3f,1 Condover Hundred}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 3f,2 Wittery Hundred}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 3f,3-7 Baschurch Hundred}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3f,1\tab '[LITTLE] ETON'. A lost place in Pitchford Ancient Parish; it lay in Con
dover Hundred in 1086. St Chad's overlordship is last mentioned in 1253 and the place itself in 1484. Its site is probably now ocupied by Pitchford Hall and the parish church, half a}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
mile north-west of Pitchford village; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 569; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, vi. p. 284; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 240, viii. pp. 117, 119. The }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday Gazetteer}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  wrongly identifies it with Eaton Mascott.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab TUROLD [* OF VERLEY *] FROM IT. It is not clear from the Latin whether Turro
ld was the 1066 or 1086 subtenant of St Chad's (or both). However, in view of the facts that the 1086 holder of the adjacent Pitchford (4,19,12) was Turold (probably Turrold of Verley: 4,19 Turold note) and that in the similar phrasing in 3d,5 Picot is de
finitely the 1086 tenant because of the later history of the holding and that in 3g,5-6;8 Godebold is almost certainly St Alkmund's tenant there as he is in 3g,3, it is more likely that the main scribe of Great Domesday merely omitted }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ten}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 et}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Turold}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 here. Moreover, there are only a handful of mentions in Domesday of people holding from the }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  tenant.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3f,2\tab MARTON. This was a township of Chirbury Ancient Parish. It lay in Wittery Hundred in 1086 and was later in Chirbury. It was lost to St Chad's
 after Domesday, being given to the honour of Montgomery (4,1,15 Montgomery note), first to }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Bollers }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 then to the Cantilupe family under whom it was held by the Hunalds. In the }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 966, among fees of William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Cantilupo}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 William }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Honaud }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds half a}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 fee in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Merton'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 61a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 233, 240; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. no. 17; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 80.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ALWARD [* SON OF ALMUND *]. }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The Domesday forms of the name-form Alward - }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Aluuard}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ), }{
\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Eluuard}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ), }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Aeluuard}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ), }{
\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Aluuart}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Aluard}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ], }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Awart}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 - could represent Old English \'c6}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 lfweard}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  or Old English }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \'c6thelweard}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , or even Old Danish }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Halwarth}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 155-57, under }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Al-weard}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , and see also p. 142, under }{
\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Al-}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . JRM followed von Feilitzen in keeping to the base form, but preferred the second element -ward for Old English }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 -weard}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, as it reflected the majority of the Domesday spellings. The printed Phillimore edition has the forms Al
ward, Alfward, occasionally Aethelweard, and in Yorkshire Alweard; these have now been standardized as Alward. The Alecto edition has Alweard for those appearing under }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Al-weard}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
. Some of those called Alward in the present edition appear under Old English }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \'c6lfweard}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  in von Feilitzen, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 181, but only because the forms in the }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Liber Exoniensis}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  suggest this, or because of other evidence. Some also appear under Old English }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \'c6thelweard
}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  in von Feilitzen, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 188-89, as they do in the Alecto edition, but their Domesday forms lack the medial \-}{
\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 -d-}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  or }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 -g-}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  that JRM thought necessary for inclusion under that form.
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Alward is a common name, but family and tenurial links make it probab
le that the Alward who held from Earl Roger (3f,2. 3g,10. 4,1,2;36. 4,27,9;17-21;23-25), or whose estates were acquired by Reginald of Bailleul (4,3,61;64;68;70), was Almund's son. It is improbable that two Anglo-Saxon survivors named Alward would share t
he same tenurial patterns. Of the remaining estates held by Alward }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 in Shropshire (4,4,21. 4,5,15. 4,21,6;10. 4,27,35), all except Holdgate (4,21,6) was a close neighbour to one of the holdings of Alward or Almund, and even Holdgate was conveniently s
ituated midway between two clusters of their estates. It is likely that these, too, belonged to Alward son of Almund (JP).}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab On Almund the father of Alward, see 4,27,17 Almund note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HOLDS FROM THE CHURCH. [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a gap suitable for about four letters after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \'eaccl'a}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
. It is not clear whether he intended to add anything here, though almost all of the spaces he left in Shropshire were for a reason (1,5 hide note, 4,1,22 Earl note and \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}), but 
compare 4,20,18 land note, 4,26,3 land note, 5,1 ploughs note and 7,6 ploughs note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab RIDERS. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 radmans}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 over an erasure; there is an erased memo in the inner margin level with it. On these erased marginal notes, see C6 accident note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 
VALUE NOW 10s, BUT IT ONLY PAYS 6s 2d. The manor was probably being held at a revenue ('farmed'); see 4,4,8 which states that Bausley's value is 2s but it is 'at a revenue for 6s 8d', and compare 4,4,7 pays note. On the practice of 'farming
', see 1,4 value note and 3d,5 revenue note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3f,3\tab BICTON. This was a township and chapelry of the Ancient Parish of Shrewsbury St Chad. It is now a separate Civil Parish and Ecclesiastical Parish. In 1086 it was in Baschurch Hundred, then in Pimhill Hundre
d. It was held from the church in the thirteenth century by a family named from the place, later by the Abbey of Buildwas. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 75b, in Pimhill Hundred, the heirs of William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Bukedon' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hold}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Bukedon' of }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 St Chad's in Shrewsbury; see }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pimhill Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 120; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii. p. 191; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 261a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 230; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix. no. 432; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 164.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3f,4\tab 
YORTON. Yorton is in Broughton which was a chapelry of the Ancient Parish of Shrewsbury St Mary, then was itself an Ancient Parish. Yorton and Broughton (3f,5) both lay in Baschurch Hundred in 1086, later in Pimhill Hundred and the Liberty of Shrewsbury. 
In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 75a (Pimhill Hundred) }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Burchton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ivarton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
are held by the Dean and Canons of St Chad's in Shrewsbury and by them from the fee of the Bishop of Chester; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pimhill Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 120; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 160.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab A PRIEST. He was probably a canon of St Chad's of Shrewsbury.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3f,5\tab BROUGHTON. It was a chapelry of the Ancient Parish of Shrewsbury St Mary, then was itself an Ancient Parish. See 3f,4 Yorton note and 3d,1 Broughton note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3f,6\tab ROSSALL. 'Little' Ross
all was in the Ancient Parish of Shrewsbury St Chad and is now in Bicton parish. Bicton was a township and chapelry of the Ancient Parish of Shrewsbury St Chad. It is now a separate Civil Parish and Ecclesiastical Parish.. It}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 lay in Baschurch Hundred in 1086, later in Pimhill Hundred and Shrewsbury Liberty. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 75b, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Roshal' Parva}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 1 hide, is held by William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Terum }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of the fee of St Chad's; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Pimhill Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 120; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lay Subsidy Roll (1334)}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 251 (where part is taxed with Bicton, 3f,3); }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix. no. 432; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 168.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3f,7\tab ONSLOW. This was in the Ancient Parish of Shrewsbury St Chad, now in Bicton. Bicton was a township and chapelry of the Ancient Parish of Shrews
bury St Chad. It is now a separate Civil Parish and Ecclesiastical Parish. Another part of Onslow (4,5,7) lay in "Rinlau" Hundred in 1086, but it is not necessary to supply a hundred head: the two parts went to different medieval hundreds, this holding of
 St Chad's being later in Pimhill Hundred, the expected successor for a place in Baschurch Hundred in 1086. This will have been the 1 hide held in Pimhill Hundred by Roger }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Ondeslauwe }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
from the fee of St Chad's in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 75b; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pimhill Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 120; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 171, x. p. 169.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 PLOUGH. In the manuscript there is a full-stop after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 car'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
although it is not particularly faint, it is not reproduced in the Ordnance Survey facsimile. This happens quite
 often with full-stops and attention is not generally drawn to it again in these notes. The stop is reproduced clearly in the Alecto facsimile. For other instances of letters and signs' being either imperfectly or wrongly reproduced or not reproduced at a
l
l in the facsimile, see 4,3,9;51;55;61. 4,5,1;5;7;10. 4,6,1. 4,11,7;13. 4,19,3;9;11. 4,20,1. 4,23,16. 4,27,6. 4,28,5. 8,1 notes. For an example of something reproduced in the Ordnance Survey facsimile that is not in the manuscript, see 4,3,32 facsimile no
te.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3g\tab WHAT ST ALKMUND'S [* OF SHREWSBURY *] HOLDS. The Church of St Alkmund was in 1086 a college of secular canons. St Alkmund was a Northumbrian prince said to have been murdered }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 c}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . 800 on the orders of King Eardwulf. The foundation of the church was att
ributed to the Lady Aethelflaed of Mercia (daughter of King Alfred) who died in 918. King Edgar (died 975) increased its endowment and created 10 prebends for it. It appears to have been carved out of the land of St Mary's of Shrewsbury (SHR 3d) and to ha
ve been closely associated with the Church of St Juliana (SHR 3h).
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab After the Conquest the patronage passed from the king to Earl Roger who gave many of the estates to his cleric Godebold: Mason, 'Officers and Clerks', p. 253. The lands passed to Godebold 
's illegitimate son Robert, then to Richard (I) }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Belmeis}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bishop of London (1108-1127), who acted as viceroy in Shropshire after 1102. Richard (II) }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Belmeis }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (brother of Philip }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Belmeis}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 elder nephew of Richard (I) }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Belmeis}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 secured the prebends
 and granted them to the Arrouaisian canons from Dorchester-on-Thames (Oxfordshire) who had been invited to Lilleshall by his brother Philip. The new Augustinian abbey was established at Lilleshall by 1148 and held St Alkmund's lands until the Dissolution
. Lilleshall (3g,3) was among its possessions in 1086; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 262; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 210; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 70-80, xi. p. 153; Knowles and Hadcock,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Medieval Religious Houses}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 418, 438, 482; Basse
tt, 'Anglo-Saxon Shrewsbury and its Churches', pp. 9-11; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 531.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The lands held by this church can be found in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 261; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. pp. 197-98; and }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. pp. 263-64. A thirteenth-century cartulary of the abbey, owned by the Duke of Sutherland, is British Library, Loan MS 39 and was transcribed by Eyton for his }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 his transcription is in the Bodleian Library, Oxford (Top. Salop, d.3); see Davis, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Medieval Cartularies}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 65 no. 577. The confirmation charter of Pope Alexander III (see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 219) enumerates the prebends as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lilleshull }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(Lilleshall: 3g,3), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Ettingham }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Atcham: 3g,6), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Ukington }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Uckington: 3g,5), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Longedon }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Longdon-upon-Tern: 3g,4), }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Edbricteleg }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Albrightlee: 3g,7), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hennecot }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Hencott: 3g,2 hides note), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Preston }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Preston[(Gubbals]: 3g,8), }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lee }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Lea: 3g,8 Preston note), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Cherlton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ('Charlton': 3g,9), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Dinthill }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Dinthill: 3g,11), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Wiluuredeschot }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (i.e. Wistanstow: 9,1) and 9 acres in another }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Cherlton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ('Charlton':3g,8 Preston note). The Confirmation of Henry III, given in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum
}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 264 (no. xi), is similar, but adds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Preston juxta Moneford }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Preston Montford: 3g,10) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wystanstowe }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(Wistanstow which had been alienated by 1086: 9,1). The prebend of Wistanstow contained 4 hides (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 262, no. i) consisting of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wilfrescota }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (unidentified), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Mora }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Blakemore? and Bushmoor etc. SO4288, SO4387), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Mersse }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Marsh SO4488; see 4,3,47 Strefford note), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Effechota }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Affcot SO4486) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wistanestowe }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 itself. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Caurtune }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (4,20,9) had also belonged to the church before 1066.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab The hundredal order of this chapter is as follows:
\par \tab \tab 3g,1-2 [Shrewsbury Hundred]}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 3g,3-7 Wrockwardine Hundred}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 3g,8 Baschurch Hundred}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 3g,9 [Wrockwardine Hundred]}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 3g,10-11 "Reweset" Hundred}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab As with SHR 3b, what this church holds in the city of S
hrewsbury is entered first. At 3g,9 ('Charlton'), Domesday has a "Culvestan" Hundred head, but there are strong reasons for believing that it is erroneous: 3g, 9 'Charlton' note. However, the correct head (Wrockwardine Hundred) involves repeating a headin
g.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3g,1\tab [IN SHREWSBURY HUNDRED]. See C1 Hundred note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab SHREWSBURY. For the site of the houses held by St Alkmund's (near the castle), see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii. pp. 197, 198; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 265; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 368.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 21 BURGESSES. It would seem that the main scribe of Great Domesday originally wrote }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 burg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and then changed it to }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 burg'ens'}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , but}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 forgot to erase the first abbreviation sign which was no longer necessary. Compare 3g,5 held note. It is not clear whether }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
burg'ens' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 abbreviates the singular }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 burgensis }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (the scribe commonly used the singular after '21', '31', '41' etc.) or the plural }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
burgenses}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3g,2\tab 2 HIDES. They are mentioned in C13 among the 100 hides of the city and may well be the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hennecot }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Hencot
t SJ4815) of Pope Alexander III's confirmation charter (SHR 3g St Alkmund's note). Alkmond Park (SJ4815) will also have been included.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3g,3\tab LILLESHALL. This was an Ancient Parish. It was in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086, then in 'Bradford' Hundred. It was o
ne of the twelve prebendal estates of St Alkmund's whose interests were transferred to the abbey in Lilleshall on its foundation; see SHR 3g St Alkmund's note. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 57a, the Abbot of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lilishull' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lilishull' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in 'Bradford' Hundred; in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , (p. 113) its members are said to be }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Donyngton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Donnington SJ7012) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Mokeleston }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(Muxton SJ7114); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 227; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 210; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 153.
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab }{\i\insrsid4139880 Linleshalle }{\insrsid4139880 may have been written over an erasure; although the parchment here is quite rough, a finer pen was used for this place-name.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 10 HIDES [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a gap suitable for about six letters after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hid\'ea}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 see 1,5 hide note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab FRENCHMEN WHO SERVE. The Latin }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 francig}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 enae}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  seruientes}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  here is also found in WOR 8,11 and DOR 26,9. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Seruientes }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is probably being used in the sense of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 faciebant seruitium }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 'did service' (see WOR 8,9b;14), rather than implying land held by serjeanty, on which see LEC 13,63 servants note and, in contrast, see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Worcestershire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 i. p. 273. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Seruientes }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 are}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
also mentioned on their own in 4,4,25 and 7,4. Land held by serjeanty is normally found in the penultimate or final chapter of a Great Domesday county. In such 
cases the Frenchmen are named, and the nature of the serjeanty is clear from the text or from the later history of the holding. In the present case the Frenchmen are unnamed and it seems probable that }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 servientes}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  is included specifically to show that they are no different from the villagers. The Alecto edition has 'French sergeants'.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WOODLAND. See 4,1,1 woodland note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab LEAGUE. Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 leuuede }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 leuua }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in Shropshire (also }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 leuga }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in other counties) was a measure of length, used only of woodland in this count
y, though pasture and sometimes meadow were measured in leagues elsewhere in Great Domesday. It was traditionally reckoned at a mile and a half; but if so, some stretches of woodland etc. will have been of immense length; see }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Northamptonshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 280; and WOR 1,1c leagues note. In Shropshire the league (in both forms }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 leuuede }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 leuua}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ) is used mainly as a 'square' measure, as here, though the form }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 leuua }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
is used as a linear measure in 4,1,1;25. 4,2,1. 4,4,20;22 and 4,23,2 (in 4,4,20;22 and 4,23,2 only
 the length of the woodland is given). When the main scribe of Great Domesday wrote, for example 'woodland, 2 leagues' (4,1,7-8 etc.), it seems probable from the list of corresponding phrases in Great Domesday and Exon}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 for Devon (DEV 1,4 leagues note), that he meant the woodland measured 2 leagues by 2 leagues (i.e. 4 square leagues), not 2 leagues by 1 league, as Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Dorset Survey}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 pp. 31-33, believed.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab When indicating the genitive }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 siluae }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 here and elsewhere in this phrase, the scribe added a diphthong squiggle to the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 a}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  of }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 silua }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 rather than writing the normal }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 silu\'ea}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; this is a peculiarity of the scribe in Shropshire, though he did use it occasionally in other Great Domesday counties.
}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab GODEBOLD THE PRIEST HOLDS IT. There is no dot after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ten' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 the manuscr
ipt, so it is possible that the main scribe of Great Domesday intended to add something to the sentence (perhaps overrunning into the side margin) or he merely omitted the dot in error. Compare 3f,2 Alward note. On Godebold, see Orderic Vitalis, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ecclesiastical History }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Chibnall, ii. p. 220), who states he was one of three learned }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 clerici }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
in Earl Roger's household; see Mason, 'Officers and Clerks',}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 p. 253; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 210; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 314 note 19, xi. p. 153; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 216. He occurs again (as plain Godebold) in 3g, 5-6;8 and may well be the Godebold of 4,21,7 and 4,27,7}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3g,4\tab LONGDON[-UPON-TERN]. This was a chapelry of Pontesbury Ancient Parish, later its own parish. It lay in Wrockwardine Hundre
d in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred and is held by the Abbot of Lilleshall in that hundred as }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Longedon' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 57a; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 234.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Land at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Langandune }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 was left to Burton Abbey }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 . 1003 in the will of Wulfric Spot: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Early Charters of the West Midlands}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 149 no. 144 (= Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , no. 1536 = }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Charters of Burton Abbey}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, no. 29). The county in which }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Langandune}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  lay, and its exact identity, are uncertain. In the case of Longden upon Tern in Shropshire there is no trace of any connection with Burton Abbey. It is possible that }
{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Langandune}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  is in fact Longdon in Staffordshire: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Charters of Burton Abbey}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. xxxiv.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 2 HIDES [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the rest of the line after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hid\'ea}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see 1,5 hide note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining quarter of a line after the mill detail, perhaps for the later insertion of the woodland or another resource; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3g,5\tab HELD. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ten' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 was}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
originally written by the main scribe of Great Domesday, but corrected to }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 tenuit }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
though without the abbreviation sign being erased; compare 3g,1 burgesses note. The present note was misplaced under 3g,6 in the Phillimore printed edition.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab UCKINGTON. It lay in Wroxeter Ancient Parish and was in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086,}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 later in 'Bradford' Hundred. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Uckinton' }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is held by the Abbot of Lilleshall in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 57a, and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Attecham}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(Atcham: 3g,6), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Unkynton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Adbright'lee }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Albrightlee: 3g,7) in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (p. 113) where they are said to be members of the Church of St Alkmund's in}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Shrewsbury; see Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 237.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab GODEBOLD FROM IT. Although the Latin is unclear, Godebold (the priest) was almost}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
certainly the 1086 subtenant, as in 3g,3; see 3f,1 Turold note and 3g,3 Godebold note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3g,6\tab ATCHAM. This was an Ancient Parish. The place was in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086, later in}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 'Bradford' Hundred. It is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Attinham }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 57a, held by the Abbot of Lilleshall; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 228;}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 113 (3g,5 Uckington note); Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 239.}{
\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab GODEBOLD FROM IT. Although the Latin is unclear, Godebold (the priest) was almost}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
certainly the 1086 subtenant, as in 3g,3; see 3f,1 Turrold note and 3g,3 Godebold note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 HIDE [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a gap suitable for five or six letters after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 i hida}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see 1,5 hide note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3g,7\tab ALBRIGHTL
EE. It was formerly in the Ancient Parish of Shrewsbury St Alkmund, then in Uffington Ancient Parish which was succeeded by a Civil Parish of that name. Albrightlee lay in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. It is not mentioned in 1
255 in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , but is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Adbright'lee }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  (p. 113; see 3g,5 Uckington note); see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 246.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab With Albright Hussey (4,3,51;57) and Albrighton (4,3,71), Albrightlee had probably once formed a single land-unit: Bassett, 'Anglo-Saxon Shrewsbury and its Churches', p. 9.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 HIDE. [***].The main scribe of Great Domesday left a gap suitable for five or six letters after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 i hida.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see 1,5 hide note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab EARL ROGER TOOK IT AWAY. It is not clear if the woodland (which may have lain at some distance from this estate) has been joined to any other manor.
\par \tab \tab See also Fleming, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday Book and the Law}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 225 no. 1320.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3g,8\tab 
PRESTON [GUBBALS]. This was a chapelry of Prees Ancient Parish, then a Civil Parish from 1866, later included in Pimhill Civil Parish. The name Gubbals is from the holder Godebold . It was in Baschurch Hundred in 1086, later in Pimhill Hundred, wher
e the Abbot of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lileshull }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 4 hides in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Preston Gubald }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 belonging to the Church of St Alkmund in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 75a; see the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pimhill Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 119; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids
}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 231; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 171. Lea ( SJ4921 ) was a}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
member, as was an unidentified 'Charlton', not the same as 3g,9: see SHR 3g St Alkmund's note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab GODEBOLD FROM IT. Although the Latin is unclear, Godebold (the priest) was almost}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
certainly the 1086 subtenant, as in 3g,3; see 3f,1 Turold note and 3g,3 Godebold note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 4 HIDES [***].The main scribe of Great Domesday left a gap suitable for about five letters after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hid\'ea}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see 1,5}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  hide }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3g,9\tab IN "CULVESTAN" HUNDRED. The heading must be an error since Lilleshall Abbey's
\par \tab 'Charlton' lay in Shawbury parish. No later reference to 'Charlton' has been found that}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab gives its medieval hundred from which its 1086 situation might be deduced. If the error of the main scribe of Great Domesday}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 lay 
in inserting a hundred head, Charlton could have been in Baschurch Hundred, like 3g,8 and the adjacent Moreton Corbet (4,19,9). On the other hand, as it later lay in Shawbury parish, it may well have been in Wrockwardine Hundred, the scribe having failed 
to include it with other Wrockwardine manors (3g,3-7). It has been notionally included in Wrockwardine Hundred for this edition.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 'CHARLTON'. This lost place lay in Shawbury Ancient Parish and was perhaps in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086 (see 3g,9 Hundred no
te). It is mentioned several times in the Lilleshall Cartulary (for example, on folios 61, 62, 81, 86, 123; see SHR 3g St Alkmund's note) and in two deeds in Shrewsbury Borough Library (nos. 5413, 16293) in the last of which it is described as }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Cherleton' iuxta Shawebury}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 261a; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii. p. 197; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 265; Eyton, 
}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 1, vii. p. 202, viii. pp. 219, 250; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 314 note 21, ii. pp. 71-73, iii. p. 
8, xi. pp. 96-97; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 73. It lay in the northern extension of the parish that is between Moreton Corbet and the River Roden, its last recorded mention apparently being on the Ordnance Survey Index to the Tithe Survey sheet 73SW (of}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  c}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 1850, overprinted on the one-inch map of 1833). For other 'Charltons', see 3g,8 Preston note. 4,1,1 St Peter note. 4,4,25 Cherrington note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab IT PAID 4s. Or possibly 'he paid' referring to the rider which would mean that he had been (and presumably 
still was) holding 'Charlton' for a money rent; see 3d,5 revenue note on 'farming', and compare 4,12,1 free man note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3g,10\tab PRESTON [MONTFORD]. This was formerly in the Ancient Parish of Shrewsbury St Alkmund, but is now in Bicton. Bicton was a township an
d chapelry of the Ancient Parish of Shrewsbury St Chad. It is now a separate Civil Parish and Ecclesiastical Parish. Preston Montford lay in "Reweset" Hundred in 1086, later in Ford Hundred. Another portion (4,4,24) lay in Baschurch Hundred. After 1086, P
reston was for a time held of the honour of Montgomery: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 66b, records how the Abbot of Lilleshall holds it as a gift of Robert }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Budlers}
{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 lord of Montgomery. See }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 96b; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 235; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 399; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 194.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ALWARD [* SON OF ALMUND *]. See 3f,2 Alward note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3g,11\tab DINTHILL. Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Duntune. }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 It lay in "Reweset" Hundred in 1086, later in Ford Hundred and was formerly in the Ancient
 Parish of Shrewsbury St Alkmund, now in Bicton. Bicton was a township and chapelry of the Ancient Parish of Shrewsbury St Chad. It is now a separate Civil Parish and Ecclesiastical Parish.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Dunthull }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in Ford Hundred is held by the Abbot of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lilleshull }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 235; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 196.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3h\tab THIS FIEF was a late addition by the main scribe of Great Domesday, done at the same time as the fief of St Michael's Church (SHR 3e) and similarly lacking a hundred head, and pr
obably in the same campaign of addition as the nine lines on Bromfield (3d,7). There are two fairly large holes in the parchment to the right of the entry and in view of this the scribe would normally have begun a new column for a subsection of SHR 3. (He
 
wrote round the holes on the reverse; see 4,1,26 this entry note.) He probably decided to write the addition here in order to keep the lands of the churches together, although if the two-line erasure at the foot of folio 253b had been done when he wrote (
s
ee 4,1,5 after note) he would probably have entered this fief to the right of the holes and extending under folio 253b. For an indicator of when it was added, see 3d,7 land note. These holes, like the one on folio 257 (see 4,11,5 hole note and 4,16,2 than
es note) have been neatly repaired during one of the re-bindings of the manuscript by a piece of parchment inserted from this side of the folio, the edges of the hole being scarfed and the parchment stuck over them.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The Ordnance Survey facsimile does not reproduce the abbreviation line above the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 C}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 SCA }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
in the heading, although it is clear in the manuscript and is in the same deep red as the rest of the heading. It is clearly reproduced in the Alecto facsimile.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WHAT ST JULIANA'S [* OF SHREWSBURY *] HOLDS
. St Juliana's in Shrewsbury was, in 1086, a college for secular canons. The first mention of the church is in Great Domesday, but its foundation was probably earlier: the shape of its small parish and other details suggests that it was related to St Alkm
u
nd's and was possibly founded at the same time as a small house for nuns. It later became a royal free chapel and its history becomes involved with the Church of St Michael (SHR 3e St Michael's note). It is now called the Church of St Julian as if dedicat
ed to a St Julianus. It is unclear which St Juliana is intended; see Auden, 'Church and Parish of St Juliana'; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 1464; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 79a; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 367; Knowles and Hadcock,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Medieval Religious Houses}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 418, 438, 482; Bassett, 'Anglo-Saxon Shrewsbury and its Churches', pp. 11-13; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 530.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3h,1\tab [IN SHREWSBURY HUNDRED]. See C1 Hundred note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \'bd }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 HIDE. This estate is mentioned in C13 under the 100 hides of Shrewsbury and must have been part of the present parish of St Julian, but it has not been precisely identified; see Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 367.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4\tab LAND OF EARL ROGER. }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 He was the son of Roger I of Montgommery, which is represented by the adjacent settlements of Sainte-Foy de Montgommery and Saint-Germain de Montgommery, in the French d\'e9
partement of Calvados (arrondissement Lisieux, canton Livarot). The name was transferred by Earl Roger to Montgomery now in Powys (SO2296) just over the Welsh
 border. In 1086 it was the name of a castle, the centre of an important group of Earl Roger's lands; see 4,1,15. 4,1,35-36, and 4,1,15 Montgomery note. Roger is never called Roger of Montgommery or of Montgomery in Domesday, though his son Hugh was; see 
STS 9.
\par \tab \tab In Normandy Roger was }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 vicomte of the Hi\'e9mois. }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 He was married to Mabel, daughter of William Talvas of Bell\'eame. His children by Mabel were Robert of Bell\'ea
me, Roger of Poitou, Hugh, Arnulf, Philip, Matilda (who married Count Robert of Mortain), Mabel (who married Hugh of Ch\'e2teauneuf) and Sibil (married to Robert son of Hamo). After Mabel's murder }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 c}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
. 1077 Roger married Adelaide du Puiset and by her had a son, Everard.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Roger supplied ships for Duke William's invasion of England, but did not come himself until }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 1067. }{\insrsid4139880 He was a loyal supporter of Duke and King William}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 to whom he was related by the marriage of his father to a niece of Gunnor(a), William's great-grandmother. In England he was granted the Rapes of Arundel and Chichester in Sussex and had a cas
tle at Arundel, but there is no reason to think that he was ever styled Earl of Arundel. On the death of Earl Edwin of Mercia }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
1071, he received most of Shropshire, becoming Earl of Shrewsbury.}{\insrsid4139880  Roger founded the Abbeys of Saint-Martin de S\'e9es and of Almenesches (both in Normandy) and also St Peter's of Shrewsbury.
\par \tab \tab He rebelled against William II in 1088 but managed to extricate himself. In 1094 he retired to his abbey in Shrewsbury Abbey just before his death. His English lands passed to hi
s second son, Hugh of Montgomery, and on Hugh's death in 1098 to Roger's eldest son, Robert of Bell\'eame, who forfeited the fief in 1102 for rebellion. His third son, Roger of Poitou, was given an important fief of his own by the Conqueror.
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab See }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Middlesex}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 110; Loyd, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Some Anglo-Norman Families}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 68; Keats- Rohan, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Domesday People}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 399.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab There are several indications that in the circuit volume, which was the likely predecessor of Domesday Shropshire and the other counties in circuit V, all Earl 
Roger's lands were detailed in one large section that was arranged by hundred, although it is possible that those held by him in lordship (4,1) were in a separate section. The main scribe of Great Domesday would have picked out from this composite section
 
the holdings of the individual subtenants. This is exactly what happened in Domesday Cornwall, where the bulk of the county was in the hands of the Count of Mortain and dealt with in Exon in one huge hundredally-arranged section, which the Great Domesday 
s
cribe split up into 26 sub-chapters arranged by subtenant. The same method of dividing SHR 4 into numbered sub-chapters is employed as it is in CON 5. The scribe's method of indicating the subtenants in SHR 4 is also exactly the same as in CON 5 (see CON 
5
 count note). Thus, the scribe indicated the beginning of each sub-chapter with capitals for the holder's Christian name, lined through in red for emphasis and with the initial letter a large rubricated capital; he used capitals and, with one exception (4
,
27,12, probably accidental), full rubrication for the names of the various holders in chapter 4,27 (which corresponds to the 'Land of the Thanes/French Men-at-Arms/King's Servants' in other counties). Subsequent entries in each sub-chapter almost invariab
ly began 'The same/He also \'85
 holds'. Where the Great Domesday scribe did not adhere to this practice, there is often a suspicion that he was unsure of the tenant's identity, and the descent of the land in question often supports this; see 4,4,23 Roger note,
 4,11,10 Cosford note, 4,11,17 Ralph note, and compare 4,5,5 Brampton note, 4,14,29 Buchehale note and 4,22,2 Hugh note. In Domesday Cornwall there are similar instances of a change in formula within sub-chapters and for the same reason; see CON 5 arrange
ment note. The Great Domesday scribe left a space for one or more lines of writing between these sub-chapters; with the exception of the line between chapters 4,15 and 4,16, Farley indicated these spaces.
\par \tab \tab Moreover, the inclusion within sub-chapters of sev
eral entries that did not belong there suggests that the scribe (probably accidentally) wrote them where he found them; see 4,1 arrangement note. Finally, the brief omission of a number of entries is easily explained by the scribe's need to search repeate
d
ly through a long section to remove the holdings of individual subtenants; these omitted entries would then have been found during the checking of the original and inserted; see 4,3,71 entry note, 4,9,4 entry note, 4,12,1 entry note, 4,14,28 entry note. E
xactly the same errors and subsequent insertions occurred in Domesday Cornwall, though during the initial writing up of that county.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab It is improbable that the circuit volume was perfect. The Count of Mortain's fief in Cornwall in it, though arranged hundr
edally, contains some dislocations which are inevitable, if, as is likely, it was itself a conversion from a territorially-arranged schedule, containing full manorial detail, like the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Inquisitio Comitatus Cantabrigiensis}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ARRANGEMENT. After the land that 
Earl Roger himself held (see 4,1 Roger note), the lands of his tenants were detailed (sub-chapters 4,2 - 4,27). The order of these subtenants was not wholly by importance nor by the number and size of their holdings. An early place seems to have been acco
r
ded to Earl Hugh, Earl Roger's counterpart in Cheshire (4,2), then to Reginald, Roger's sheriff (4,3), who held the most land from the earl. It may be that the Corbet brothers, Roger and Robert, were entered next because of their importance (4,4-5), but i
t is probable that after Reginald the main scribe of Great Domesday entered tenants with the same initial next to each other, as elsewhere in Domesday: thus, 4,4,4 to 4,4,12 contain the lands of subtenants beginning with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 R}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , then 4,4,13 to 4,4,16 those beginning with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 W}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , followed by the holdings of two beginning with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 O}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, and so on. There seems no reason to think that the seven estates of 4,26 (Roger the hunter) were not a sub-chapter in their own right, but part of 4,27, as Lewis, 'Introduction', }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Shropshire Domesday}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 12. Space was left after 4,26 and before the first of the entries in 4,27, as usual; on the layout of the latter, see 4,27 tenants note. When Robert of Bell\'ea
me forfeited his lands in 1102, many of those tenants who had not joined him were allowed to retain their lands as tenants-in-chief. Chapter 4 ends with a brief appendix (4,28) consisting of lands that mostly should have been entered in sub-chapter 4,1.

\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Although the lands of Earl Roger and his men are grouped by holder, not by hundred, there is a reasonably consistent hundredal order within each sub-chapter.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 4,1 Lordship land of Earl Roger
\par \tab \tab 4,2 Earl Hugh [of Chester]}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 4,3 Reginald the sheriff}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 4,4 Roger son of Corbet}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 4,5 Robert son of Corbet}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 4,6 Robert the butler}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 4,7 Roger of Courseulles}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 4,8 Roger of Lacy}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 4,9 Robert son of Theobald}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 4,10 Ranulf Peverel
\par \tab \tab 4,11 Ralph of Mortimer
\par \tab \tab 4,12 Richard
\par \tab \tab 4,13 William of Warenne
\par \tab \tab 4,14 William Pandolf
\par \tab \tab 4,15 William Malbank
\par \tab \tab 4,16 Walkelin
\par \tab \tab 4,17 Osbern [son of Richard]}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 4,18 Odo [of Berni\'e8res]
\par \tab \tab 4,19 Turold [of Verley]}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 4,20 Picot
\par \tab \tab 4,21 Helgot
\par \tab \tab 4,22 Hugh son of Thorgils
\par \tab \tab 4,23 Gerard of Tournai
\par \tab \tab 4,24 Nigel
\par \tab \tab 4,25 Norman [the hunter]}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 4,26 Roger the hunter}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 4,27 Various minor French and English tenants
\par \tab \tab 4,28 Further lands held by Earl Roger
\par \tab Within many of these sub-fiefs all the hundreds or groups of hundreds appear to be entered in a standard order of }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 1 Shrewsbury, 2 Hod
net, 3 Patton, 4 Condover, 5 "Rinlau", 6 "Reweset", 7 Wittery, 8 Wrockwardine, 9 "Merset", 10 "Culvestan", 11 Leintwardine, 12 'Overs', 13 Baschurch, 14 "Alnodestreu" and 15 'Conditre'. This was first suggested by Chris Lewis ('Introduction', }{
\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Shropshire Domesday}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 9). In fact Shrewsbury Hundred does not appear in Earl Roger's fief and the fiefs where it does appear are in disorder or differently ordered. However, Lewis' numbering has been retained in showing the hundredal order of each of the sub-chapters
; see \{Introduction: Standard Order of Hundreds\}.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1\tab [WHAT EARL ROGER HIMSELF HOLDS]. As a quasi-'Palatine' earl, Roger acted as the}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 king within Shropshire. There is thus no }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Terra Regis 
}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in the county. Those manors (4,1,1-12) that were held by King Edward, and would normally have passed to King William, were held by the earl. For the extent of his powers, see 4,1,37.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ARRANGEMENT. Sub-chapter 4,1 is arranged in a series of groups by the identity and status of the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  holder, and within each group by hundred:}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 4,1,1-12. Manors held by King Edward. The hundredal order is: }{\insrsid4139880 Wrockwardine Hundred (}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,1,1); }{\insrsid4139880 Condover Hundred (}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,1,2); }{\insrsid4139880 
Baschurch Hundred (}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,1,3); [}{\insrsid4139880 Hodnet] Hundred (}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,1,4); [}{\insrsid4139880 "Alnodestreu"] Hundred (}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,1,5); [}{\insrsid4139880 "Culvestan"] Hundred (}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
4,1,6); [}{\insrsid4139880 "Reweset"] Hundred (}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,1,7-9); [}{\insrsid4139880 Wittery] Hundred (}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,1,10); [}{\insrsid4139880 "Merset"] Hundred (}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,1,11-12);}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 4,1,13. A Welsh district attached to "Merset" Hundred, two of whose manors (4,1,11-12) have just been entered.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 4,1,14-31. Land held}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 by prominent earls and thanes of King Edward: Edric the wild, Earls Edwin and Morcar, the Lady Godiva and Leofwin Young.}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  The hundredal order is: }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 "Rinlau"] Hundred (}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,14); Montgomery Castle (4,1,15); }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
"Reweset" Hundred (4,1,16); [Baschurch] Hundred (}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,17-20); [}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wrockwardine] Hundred (}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,21-23); [}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 "Alnodestreu"] Hundred (}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,24-25); [}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Patton ?] Hundred or possibly a continuation of "Alnodestreu" Hundred (}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,26); [}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 "Culvestan"] Hundred (}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
4,1,27-29); [}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 'Conditre'] Hundred (}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,30); [}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 "Alnodestreu"] Hundred (}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,31). The reason for entering Montgomery castle here (at 4,1,15) is unclear.
}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 4,1,32-36. A miscellaneous group of entries: land exchanged with Wenlock Church; land held by Steinulf and Siward }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
; lands belonging to Montgomery castle. The hundredal order is: [}{\insrsid4139880 "Alnodestreu"] Hundred (}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,1,32-33); [}{\insrsid4139880 Condover] Hundred (}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,1,34); }{\insrsid4139880 Wittery Hundred (}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,1,35-36).}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 4,1,37. Shrewsbury and Shropshire (summary).
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab For the early entries in this sub-chapter, the hundred heads can be supplied from those manors to which the hundreds are said to have bel
onged. But from 4,1,14 onwards the heads must be supplied largely from later evidence, although the material is clearly arranged in hundredal groups. Thus the lands held by Earl Edwin }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 are not entered together, but apparently hundred by hundred along with those of other of King Edward's leading men. In fact, within the groups, no hundred is entered more than once except }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
"Alnodestreu" Hundred 4,1,24-25;31. This last entry is for the land of Countess Godiva which may have been missed at first or kept apart for some reason.
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 When Robert of Bell\'eame, Earl Roger's son, forfeited his lands by rebellion, all these estates came to the Crown and were granted out at different times to different holders.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,1\tab WROCKWARDINE. This was an Ancient Parish. It was }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 caput }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
of Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086 and was later in 'Bradford' Hundred. After being forfeited in 1102 it was royal demesne until Henry II granted half its annual value (in 1172) to Roger and Jonas of Powys, then (from 1175) its full value. It was farmed out
 to Hamo Lestrange in 1200 and continued in the family. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wrocwurthin' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 was held at farm by John }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Extraneus }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Lestrange) in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 146, and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wrecwrthin }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in 'Bradford' Hundred in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 56b, was held by Hamo }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Extraneus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 221, 227, 238; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. no. 516, ix. no. 224. The }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 117, lists the members of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wrowardyn }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 as }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Admaston }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Admaston SJ6313),}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 Aldescote }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Allscott SJ6113),}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Leyton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Leaton SJ6111), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Burcote }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Burcot SJ6211), }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Nesse }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (probably 'Nash', a township of Wrockwardine, rather than 'Ness Lestrange': 4,1,17, as proposed in the Phillimore printed edition), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Clotley }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (representd by Cluddley and Clotley, both SJ6310; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 328, iv. no. 279) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Walcote }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Walcot SJ5911), of which the Abbot of Haughmond holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Walcote}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, nos. 217, 421, 1237, 1250-55, 1270, appendix A. i).}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 On the whole manor, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 19; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 310.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 7 \'bd
 OUTLIERS. The nine later townships of Wrockwardine were Admaston, Allscott, Bratton, Burcot, Charlton, Cluddley, Leaton, 'Nash' and Orleton. Of these Bratton is separately treated by Domesday (4,14,19). Otherwise the list corresponds 
to that given in 4,1,1 Wrockwardine note, except that Walcot is not included, but Orleton is; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, xi. p. 310. Walcot may have become a member of Wellington (4,1,22 Wellington note) after 1086.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WHICH PAY TAX. Scribe B added }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geld}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ' here in pa
ler ink and in the outer margin. This is the first of his 27 contributions to Shropshire, of which 19 concerned the taxability of the holding. These 19 additions are all parts of the verb }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geldare}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, usually abbreviated by him to }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geld'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  or }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 gld'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . See also 4,1,2
. 4,3,2;4-5. 4,11,17. 4,14,1;14-18. 4,19,1;3;5. 4,23,2-3;5 and, in a longer phrase, 4,24,4. He also made similar insertions in Herefordshire (HEF 10,10. 12,1. 15,10) and Cheshire (CHS A15-16. 1,6-8;31) and once in Wiltshire (WIL 67,27). On the spaces regu
larly left after the hidage by the main scribe of Great Domesday, often with no dot after the word 'hide(s)', as here, see 1,5 hide note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WOODLAND. There is an area called Wrockwardine Wood about five miles from Wrockwardine (at SJ7011). This has been a Ci
vil Parish since 1884, but may represent an ancient area of woodland appurtenant to Wrockwardine manor; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, xi. pp. 323, 326. Adjacent to it is Donnington Wood which belonged to Lilleshall (3g,3). This belt of woodland was probably once a r
esource for the Hundred of Wrockwardine and its precursor royal estate; see Stamper, 'Woods and Parks', in Astill and Grant, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Countryside in Medieval England}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 130.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THE CHURCH OF ST PETER [* OF SHREWSBURY *]. This was Earl Roger's abbey (SHR 3b).}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THIS M
ANOR'S CHURCH WITH 1 HIDE. The church of Wrockwardine was a gift of Earl Roger who founded Shrewsbury Abbey, the St Peter's church referred to here (SHR 3b St Peter's note). The 1 hide is probably that recorded in the Shrewsbury Cartulary, as given by Ode
lerius the priest (the father of Orderic Vitalis) to the abbey. It lay in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Cerletona }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(Charlton in Wrockwardine, SJ5911); see the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. xviii, xix, 5, 6, 30, 32-33, 37, 39, 41 etc.); }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 56b; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 117; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 222; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, i. no. 445, x. nos. 117, 632; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 312.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab On the possibility that this was the minster church for the territory of the royal manor of Wrockwardine which became its hundred, see \{Introduction: Ecclesiastical Organization\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 2 PENNIES ... THIRD PENNY. The 'pennies' of Wrockwardine Hundred were from the pleas of that hundred (only a small portion of its revenues). The two pennies were attached to this manor because Ki
ng Edward had held it; similarly with 4,1,2-3;5 and compare 4,1,6. This also occurs in HEF 19,2;10. HAM 1,19. DEV 1,41;45 etc. The third penny here is the same as the third penny of the pleas of the shire mentioned in WAR 1,6 and DOR 1,8, but is quite dif
ferent from the third penny of the total}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 revenues of a borough C12 parts note); see Round, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Geoffrey de Mandeville}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, Appendix H, pp. 287-96; Round, 'Tertius Denarius', pp. 62-64; Morris 'Office of Sheriff', pp. 33-34. See also }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Dialogus de }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Scaccario, Book I, section xvii, pp. 64-65.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The earl here was Edwin, on whom see 3b,3 Edwin note.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab On this attachment of hundreds to manors, see \{Introduction: Hundreds\}.
\par \tab \tab See also Fleming, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday Book and the Law}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 225 no. 1321.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,2\tab CONDOVER. This was an Ancient Parish. It was }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 caput }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
of the Hundred of Condover in 1086 and later. It reverted to the Crown after the rebellion of Robert of Bell\'eame, was granted in 1226 to Henry III's sister Joan, the wife of Llewelyn the Great, then in 1238
 to Henry of Hastings (in exchange for land in Cheshire), but a successor exchanged it with Robert Burnell (Bishop of Bath and Wells 1275-1292) in 1284 after which it descended like Acton Burnell (4,4,3). The exchange is in a deed translated in Fletcher, 
'Grant by John of Hastings', p. 108; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 63a-64a, 91b, 92b-93b; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 229; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. nos. 194, 587, v. no. 611; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 8; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 37.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Among the members of this manor will have been }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Mangn' Lithe }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Parva Lithe }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Great Lyth SJ4507 and Little Lyth SJ4706) and }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wasseleg' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Westley SJ4606): }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 92a. Other members can be deduced from personal names: Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities
 of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. pp. 20-27. Land later held by the Abbot of Haughmond was described as an assart of this manor, but may have been the place called 'Botwood' in 1086; see 4,27,13 Leebotwood note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WHICH PAY TAX. Scribe B interlined }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geldant' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 above }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hid\'ea }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in
 much paler ink and with a thicker pen than those used by the main scribe of Great Domesday. On the spaces normally left for the taxability to be entered, see 1,5 hide note. On scribe B's other additions on this subject, see 4,1,1 pay note.}{
\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab IN LORDSHIP 7 
HIDES. The main scribe of Great Domesday only gave the lordship land here and in 4,1,3;5;35. 4,11,4 and 4,19,1, though in several counties in Great Domesday it is regularly given. The information seems to have been collected originally - at least in certa
in areas or for certain manors - as it appears (together with details of the villagers' land) in Exon}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(which was the immediate predecessor of Great Domesday for the south-west counties), but was excized for some reason, though imperfectly in some counties, as apparently here. Lordship land was exempt from tax: see, for example, HEF 8,2 and GLS 39,6.}{
\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab A PRIEST. There was a church dedicated to St Andrew in Condover (4,3,14 St Andrew's note). It was given to Shrewsbury Abbey by Earl Roger before his death: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. xix, 5, 30, 32, 37 etc.); }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 247b. On the possibility that this church was the minster for the territory of the royal manor of Condover which became its hundred, see \{
Introduction: Ecclesiastical Organization\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab IT PAYS \'a3
10 WITH THE HUNDRED. That is, the payment includes the two pennies from Condover Hundred; see 4,1,1 pennies note on these 'pennies'. It is not clear whether the 1066 payment also included these pennies, though probably not as the scribe
 started a new sentence for }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Reddeb' x lib'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab See also Fleming, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday Book and the Law}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 225 no. 1322.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ROGER THE HUNTER ... 1 HIDE. This was probably at Great Lyth, Roger's successors being the lords of Pulverbatch (4,26,4) who held Great Lyth in 1368: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Miscellaneous }
{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (1368), iii. p. 258 no. 684.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ALWARD [* SON OF ALMUND *]. See 3f,2 Alward note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,3\tab BASCHURCH. This was an Ancient Parish. In 1086 it was }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 caput }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
of Baschurch Hundred and was later in Pimhill Hundred. In 1086 St Peter's Church (i.e. Shrewsbury Abbey) already held the church and 2 \'bd hides. This gift of Earl Roger is recorded as the church of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bascerche }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 with its possessions, named as }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Prestecota }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Prescott SJ4221), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Noneleia }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Noneley SJ4728) and }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bageleia }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Bagley SJ4027) in the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. 5, 30, 32 nos. 2, 34, 35 etc.). His son Robert of Bell\'eame within a short time gave the rest of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Bascerce }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 'with all that belonged to it': the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. xviii, xix, 5, 19, 30-32, 35, 40, 42 etc.). Thus the whole manor came into the hands of Shrewsbury Abbey; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 76a (which has }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Baschirche }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 2 hides, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Baggeleg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \'bd hide); }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pimhill Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 119; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 230.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The element 'church' in the place-name may suggest an ancient foundation, possibly a minster that served a large multiple estate and later hundred; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 30.
\par \tab \tab On the possibility that this church was the minster for the territory of the royal manor of Baschurch which became its hundred, see \{Introduction: Ecclesiastical Organization\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 2 \'bd HIDES. Scribe B interlined }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 7 dimid'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,4\tab [IN HODNET HUNDRED]. The heading is supplied from the entry below for Hodnet where it is said to be ' the hundred that belongs to the manor'.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HODNET. This was an Ancient Parish. It was }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 caput }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Hodnet Hundred in 1086 and was later in 'Bradford' Hundred. The manor went to the honour of Montgomery (4,1,15 Montgomery note) after Robert of Bell\'eame's forfeiture and was held under that honour by a family named from Hodnet. In }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 58b, Odo }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Hodenet }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hodenet }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
in chief from the honour of Montgomery; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 227; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. nos. 17, 532, vi. no. 52, ix. no. 7, x. no. 115.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab In the course of time the manor was expanded by absorbing holdings that were independent of it in Domesday; thus the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 119 (see also }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 221) records its members as: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Longford }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Longford SJ6433), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Peplow }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Peplow: 4,11,19), }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Parva Bowlas }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Little Bolas SJ6421, probably part of Peplow in 1086), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Preston }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Preston-upon-the-Weald-Moors: 4,11,17), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Horton }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Horton, part of 4,14,20) and a half of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lawley }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Lawley: 4,19,6). Longford is identified by Eyton (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, ix. p. 337) as the place in Moreton Say parish, but it is possible that it is the Longford adjacent to Preston-upon-the-Weald-Moors (SJ7218) and thus part of it in 1086. On the whole manor, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 326.
\par \tab 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 \'bd HIDES. [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a gap suitable for some five letters after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 i hida 7 dimid'.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see 1,5 hide note.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab In view of the 10 ploughs recorded on this manor and the estimate of a further 9 ploughs, Hodnet may have been beneficially hidated; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 282; and compare 6,2 Cleobury note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab A SMALL WOOD WHICH PAYS NOTHING. Domesday has }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 silua parua}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 as also in 4,1,11. 4,19,2 and 4,28,6. }{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Small woods are infrequently mentioned in Domesday: apart from in Shropshire, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 parua silua}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  or }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 silua parua}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 occurs in BRK 8,1. 40,2. 44,2. 65,20. HAM 1,39. 28,6. 45,2. IoW6,11. KEN 2,24. SUS 2,5. 6,3. WIL 1,13. 13,11. 24,37. 27,17. WOR 15,5. 26,11. A }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 paruum nemus}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 is found in KEN 5,126 and there are several examples of diminutives: }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 parua siluula}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  in KEN 5,210. 7,23 and }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 siluula parua}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  in KEN 13,1. There is a }{
\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 paruula silua}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  in HEF 9,9 and a }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 silua paruula}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  in GLS 3,7. To these should be added the }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .ii. siluulae}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 of KEN 2,21, the one in KEN 5,134 and the one in WOR 23,12; in HEF 24,6 there is a }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 siluula}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  in which there is a hedged enclosure (}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 haia}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ). There is a }{
\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 parua landa siluae}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  ('a small tract of [wild] woodland') in 4,3,34.
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The extent of these small woods is very rarely given, the use of }{\i\insrsid4139880 parua}{\insrsid4139880  or }{\i\insrsid4139880 paruula}{\insrsid4139880 
 presumably implying that the wood is too small to have a value. Twice this is explicitly stated (}{\i\insrsid4139880 silua parua nil reddens}{\insrsid4139880 ), here and in 4,1,11. Sometimes a use is given: }{\i\insrsid4139880 ad clausuram}{
\insrsid4139880  ('for fencing') at KEN 2,21. 5,134. 13,1. SUS 2,5. 6,3, while KEN 5,126 has }{\i\insrsid4139880 paruum nemus}{\insrsid4139880  }{\i\insrsid4139880 de .xii. acris pastur\'ea}{\insrsid4139880 
 ('containing12 acres of pasture') and compare HAM IoW 6,11 }{\i\insrsid4139880 silua parua sine pasnagio}{\insrsid4139880  ('a small wood without pasturage').
 Where an extent is given, it is, with two exceptions, small. Thus in Wiltshire two woods are of 10 acres and one is of 3 acres (WIL 1,13. 13,11. 24,37).
\par \tab \tab All this tends to suggest that }{\i\insrsid4139880 parua}{\insrsid4139880  refers to the extent of the woodland, not to the size of the trees and this must also be the sense of }{\i\insrsid4139880 paruula}{\insrsid4139880 
. The two exceptions are in WIL 27,17 where the }{\i\insrsid4139880 parua silua}{\insrsid4139880  is 1 league by 1 league and in WOR 23,12 which has 1 league of }{\i\insrsid4139880 siluula}{\insrsid4139880 
. The contrast with the other examples suggests that, in these cases, the use of }{\i\insrsid4139880 parua}{\insrsid4139880  and }{\i\insrsid4139880 siluula}{\insrsid4139880  is erroneous or misleading. Possibly }{\i\insrsid4139880 parua }{
\insrsid4139880 has been mistakenly included and }{\i\insrsid4139880 siluula}{\insrsid4139880  misused for }{\i\insrsid4139880 silua}{\insrsid4139880 ; alternatively, in these instances}{\i\insrsid4139880  }{\insrsid4139880 
they may be being used in the sense of }{\i\insrsid4139880 silua}{\insrsid4139880  }{\i\insrsid4139880 minuta}{\insrsid4139880  or }{\i\insrsid4139880 silua}{\insrsid4139880  }{\i\insrsid4139880 modica}{\insrsid4139880 , both of which refer to the size
 of the trees (see 4,3,21 wood note). In the case of the small woods used 'for fencing', noted above, they might also contain small trees, although the posts and slats can be made by splitting larger trunks.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab CHURCH OF ST PETER. Shrewsbury Abbey was given the church by Earl Roger: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. xviii, 5, 30, 32, 37 etc.); }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 247b. The church may have been more important than this terse entry suggests. On the possibility that this was the minster church for the territory of the royal manor of Hodnet which became its hundred, see \{Introduction: Ecclesiastical Organization
\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,5\tab [IN "ALNODESTREU" HUNDRED]. This head is supplied from information contained within the entry.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab MORVILLE. Domesday has }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Membrefelde}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . Ekwall, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Dictionary of Place-Names }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(under Morville), suggested that the Mor brook which names the village}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 was originally called }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Memere }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 or }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Meomere
}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 213.}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 This important Saxon vill was an Ancient Parish, was}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 caput }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086 and was later in Stottesdon Hundred. Earl Roger's}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
grant of five of the 8 hides held by the Saxon church of St Gregory to his Abbey of St}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Peter in Shrewsbury began a change in the tenure of the manor. Already in 1086}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Shrewsbury Abbey held five of the 12 hides, with the reversion of three held by Earl Roger's}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
chaplains. Of his lordship hides Richard the Butler apparently held two (unless they are}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 additional to the 12 hides of the manor), leaving only two for Roger himself: the
se may have included Aldenham (SO6795) and Bridgnorth (SO7193). In 1255, 1 virgate in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Aldenham }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in Stottesdon Hundred was held by William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Aldenham }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from Walter }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Baskervill' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 who was in the wardship of Sibyl }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Giffard }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 82b); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 218; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ix. no. 323; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 79.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The borough of Bridgnorth (SO7193), perhaps earlier known as 'Quatbridge' (the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle (Parker) for 895, version C for 91
1), was probably founded on Roger's lordship land of Morville, or on the estate at Oldbury (4,3,68). In 895, a Danish army had overwintered at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Cwatbrucge}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 and built a fort there. The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle does not say on which side of the River Severn, though from Aethelweard's }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Chronicle}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 (Campbell, pp. 52-53) it appears that it was on the eastern side, if it was the same fortress that the Danes were using as a base in 910. For in that year, Aethelweard records that a Danish army had crossed the River Severn 
further downstream, that is from the English side, and ravaged lands on its western side, 'but when they returned to their home, rejoicing in their triumphal spoils, they crossed a }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 pons}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 (to put it in literate [Latin] spelling, which is called }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Cuatbricge}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  ['
Quatbridge'] by the common people) to the eastern side'. They were attacked by a joint force of Mercians and West Saxons and defeated at Wednesfield [near Tettenhall].}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab In 912 Aethelflaed, Lady of the Mercians and King Alfred's daughter, constructed a fortress at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Brycge}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 on the west bank of the River Severn (the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle; John of Worcester, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Chronicle}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 366-67). It seems likely that }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Brycge}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (etc.) and }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Cwatbrucge}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (etc.) refer to the same place and that the bridge at what became Bridgnorth i
s intended. The eastern bank of the Severn beside the bridge at Bridgnorth would have lain in the Staffordshire manor of Quatt: WAR 12,8). There is no reason to think that there was a bridge lower down the Severn closer to the settlement of Quatt itself. 
At Bridgnorth Robert of Bell\'eame refortified Aethelflaed's }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 burh }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (John of Worcester, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Chronicle}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, iii. pp. 100-101), beginning the construction of a castle there, and moved his collegiate church from Quatford. Despite his rebellion and forfeiture, Bridgnorth gradually replaced both Morville and Quatford (4,1,32) in importance; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 59a-60a, 88a-89b; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 241; Mason and Barker, 'Norman Castle at Quatford'; King, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Castellarium Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 421; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. pp. 56-59; and \{Introduction: History\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Bridgnorth included }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Walton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Bridgwalton SO6892): }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 82a; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 219, 231-32. On the whole manor of Morville, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 25 onwards.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab CHAWSON \'85 IS IN WORCESTERSHIRE The Domesday name-form is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Caluestone. }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Eyton (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. pp. 27, 68), considering that the ascription to Worcestershire was in error, suggested Cold Weston. But }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Caluestone }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is probably a mere variant of a place called }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Celvestune }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in WOR 25,1, that is Chawson in Droitwich. The same place is found as }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Chalvestona }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
in a list of manors with their hidage known as Evesham B: WOR \{The Worcester Material\}. Although remote from the Shropshire border, 
this outlier of Morville may have begun to be drawn out of Worcestershire by Earl Roger's reorganization of his manors in the same way that Halesowen (WOR 14,1) was later and more permanently: \{Introduction: County Boundary\}
. The hide would have been adjacent to Salwarpe (WOR 14,2), Roger's other Worcestershire holding, and might have provided salt-rights for Morville. See }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 43 (correcting }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 286).}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab TWO PENNIES. On this render, see 4,1,1 pennies note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab See also Fleming, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday Book and the Law}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 225 no. 1323.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab MANOR'S CHURCH IS IN HONOUR OF ST GREGORY. That is, it was dedicated to St Gregory. Although }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in honore }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
with a dependent genitive could, and often does in Great Domesday, mean 'in the honour (i.e. holding) o
f' (making the meaning here that St Gregory's Church held this manor's church), this is unlikely in view of the Saxon 'minster' church of Morville being called St}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Gregory's; see the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. 4, 30); Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 26; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. pp. 18, 29. On the possibility that this was the minster church for the territory of the royal manor of Morville which became "Alnodestreu" Hundred, see \{Introduction: Ecclesiastical Organization\}.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab CHURCH OF ST PETER ... 5 HIDES OF LAND. The Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. 5, 30, 32 nos. 2, 34, 35) records how Earl Roger gave the Church of St Gregory of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Mamerfeld }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 to}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 the abbey with the following possessions: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Estleia }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Astley Abbots SO7096, said to be 5 hides in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 81b; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 218, 231; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 163a), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Nordleia }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Nordley SO6996; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 801, v. no. 594), }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 alia Esteleia }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (perhaps 'Astley Parva', lost), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Crofta }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Croft SO6894), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Halchtona }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Haughton SO6795), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Chinseteleia }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Kingsley SO6995, rather than Kingslow SO7998, as identified by Eyton, which is the wrong side of the River Severn), }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Harpefort }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Harpsford in Cross Houses SO6991) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Billingesle }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Billingsley SO7085, presumably a detachment). 
These places were no doubt part of Morville in 1086, but probably included the 3 hides held by the earl's chaplains as well as the 5 hides held directly by St Peter's of Shrewsbury. The Shrewsbury Cartulary goes on to add }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
La Nientona }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Neenton: 4,11,8), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Tugafort }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Tugford: 4,3,8), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Fertecota }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(a lost place in Thonglands, part of Tugford in 1086: 4,3,8 Tugford note) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Westona }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (possibly Cold Weston, SO5583; see the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, p. 318); }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 166b, although Eyton was wrong in identifying this as the}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Caluestone }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
of Domesday). These last places were not part of Morville. Tugford was given by Reginald the sheriff or Warin his predecessor (see 4,3,8 Tugford note; the Shrewsbury Cartulary: Rees, p. 30).}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Billingsley, 1 hide, went to the Abbey of S\'e9es }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 1147 and was later held under it by the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Beysin}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880  family; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. nos. 503, 557, vi. no. 168, viii. no. 507, x. no. 633; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 82a; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 231; the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, p. 306).}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HOLDS 1 HIDE. This was a later addition in the outer margin by the }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 main scribe of Great Domesday.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab AND PAYS 4s TO THE MONKS. He paid rent to the monks of St Peter's, Shrewsbury, for the 1 hide, which was part of the 5 hides held by that church in 1086. The Latin has the present participle }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 reddens}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 literally 'paying'; the 1-hide holding of the man-at-arms would not have been there when he wrote it (see 4,1,5 holds note).}{
\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab REMAINING 3 HIDES. These 3 hides were the difference between the 8 hides held by St Gregory's Church before 1066 and the 5 held by the Abbey of St Peter in 1086.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 18d. This was written by the main scribe of Great Domesday over an erasure; it extends into the outer margin.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab RICHARD THE BUTLER \'85 2 HIDES. It is possible that these 2 hides are the 8 virgates recorded at }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Tassele }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Tasley SO6994) in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 82a, in Stottesdon Hundred, held by Roger Corbet under John Fitz Alan. They are likely to have been part of M
orville in 1086, but did not go with the main manor to Shrewsbury Abbey. On the other hand, descent to Fitz Alan would imply that Reginald the sheriff was perhaps Richard's over-lord (under Earl Roger: 4,2) and Richard may thus have been Reginald's butler
, not Earl Roger's; see Mason, 'Officers and Clerks',}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 p. 249; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 963; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 219, 231, 242; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 84; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 367. If so, this Richard will probably be the man of that name who holds of Reginald the sheriff in 4,3,2-3;12-13;29;59.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab A MILL. Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 molin' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 may extend to the accusative }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 molinum }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and thus be an object of }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ibi h}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 abe}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 t }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in the line above, as are the slaves and villagers.}{
\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab PACKLOADS OF CORN. The Latin is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 summas annonae}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , accusative plural. The word }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 summa }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
also occurs on eleven other occasions in Shropshire, all but once with corn, malt or wheat. The size of the packload is not known, but in the case of salt in CHS S1,4, it contained 15 }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 bulliones }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
'boilings'. The }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 summa }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of fish or salt (see 4,11,4) seems to have been 240 lbs: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Devonshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 388. In WOR 2,57;82 mills are also recorded as paying so many packloads of corn (10, as here, in the case of the 2 mills at Hartlebury).}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab AFTER THIS ENTRY two lines of text were erased, perhaps by the main scribe of Great Domesday when he added and corrected earlier in this entry; see 4,1,5 holds note and 4,1,5 18d note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,6\tab [IN "CULVESTAN" HUNDRED]. The heading is supplied from the entry below, which states that 'the whole of "Culvestan Hundred" and Patton Hundred belong to this manor', and also from geographical probability.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 'CORFHAM'. This lost place is represented by the site of Corfham Castle, marked on current Ordnance Survey maps. 'Corfham' lay in Diddlebury Ancient Parish. It was in "Culvestan" Hundred and was its }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 caput }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in 1086, and was later in Munslow Hundred. Diddlebury was a member in 1086 and has since displaced '
Corfham' in importance. After being forfeited by Earl Roger's son, 'Corfham', with Siefton and Culmington 4,1,28-29, remained in royal lordship until Henry II granted it to Hugh }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Periers}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 On his death it reverted to the Crown and was subsequently given (with the appurtenant forest of Clee) to Walter of Clifford in whose family it descended. The manor, held by Walter }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Clifford }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from the king as 7 \'bd hides, is surveyed in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 64b-65a, pp. 93b-94b, and included }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Norton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Norton SO4681) held by Hugh }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Cheyne }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bach }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(Bache SO4681). The Abbot of Haughmond then held 2 mills and \'bd virgate in 'Corfham' (the Haughmond Cartulary: Rees, nos. 235, 270), the prior of Clifford}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 1 \'bd
 virgates and the Hospitalers of Ludlow \'bd virgate. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 245, records that John }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 le Straunge }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Corfham }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 once held by Walter of Clifford with members }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Norton}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Dudulbury }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(Diddlebury SO5085), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bache }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bromcrqft }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Broncroft SO5386); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 146, 965, 973, 1283; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 224, 228; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iii. no. 544, ix. no. 223; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 145; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 82.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Culmynton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Culmington 4,1,29) was also a member: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. no. 516; see 4,1,29 
Culmington note. So was }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Petone }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Peaton SO5384): }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 544. A further part of the manor was \'bd hide in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lanton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lauton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Lawton SO5183): }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 70b, 71b; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 1284; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 223; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, i. no. 921, iii. no. 156, viii. nos. 226, 496. This became a serjeanty.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab KING EDWARD HELD IT, [***]. In the manuscript there is an erasure of some 14 letters' width after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 tenuit}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 presumably done after the main sc
ribe of Great Domesday had completed the entry. He probably intended to add something there as he did not draw a link-line to fill the gap; compare 4,1,9 hide note and 9,1 hides note. It is not clear what is missing from the entry, however, unless it is t
he "Culvestan" hundred head; see 4,1,10 king note and 4,1,22 Earl note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab VALUE 5s. As this seems too little to be the value of all of 'Corfham', it would seem likely that it refers only to the \'bd-hide subtenancy, the value of the whole manor being \'a36.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THE CHURCH OF ST PETER [* OF SHREWSBURY *] HOLDS THIS MANOR'S CHURCH. The church was at Diddlebury (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Dodeleberia }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
in the Shrewsbury Cartulary: Rees, p. 30, see p. 32) given by Earl Roger to St Peter's, Shrewsbury, together with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Spertford }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Sparchford SO4983) and \'bd hide in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Croftona }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (part of Corfton SO4984: 4,8,10). The church subsequently went to the Abbey of S\'e9es: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. 5, 30, 32, 306 nos. 2, 34, 35 etc.).
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The church may well have been a minster for the territory of royal manor of 'Corfham' and therefore of its dependent hundred of "Culvestan", and possibly of Patton Hundred as well; see \{
Introduction: Ecclesiastical Organization\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab PAYS 18s TO THE MONKS. St Peter's probably put the 18s from the revenue received for the hide towards the upkeep of their monks.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab "CULVESTAN" HUNDRED AND PATTON HUNDRED. It seems likely that King Edward had no manor in Patton Hundred, so his presence in it was assured by making 'Corfham' }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 caput }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of it: \{Introduction: Hundreds\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 2 PENNIES. On this render, see 4,1,1 pennies note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab See also Fleming, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday Book and the Law}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 225 no. 1324.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,7\tab [IN "REWESET" HUNDRED]. The hundred head is supplied from the fact that Alberbury (4,1,9) was certainly in this hundred, since the hundred was attached to it.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab MINSTERLEY. This was an Ancient Parish. The place-name means 'field in a wood belonging to a minster church', referring to the church at Westbury (4,4,15): }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 11. Minsterley seems to have been in "Reweset" Hundred in 1086, later in Ford Hundred. After Robert of Bell\'eame forfeited the earldom, Minsterley went to the}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Corbets of Cause; it is probable that the 1086 subtenant Roger is Roger son of Corbet (4,4 Roger note). }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Munsterlegh }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is held in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 235 by Peter Corbet; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 85, iii. no. 603; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 45; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 310.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ROGER [* SON OF CORBET *]. The identification is probable in view of the later descent of the manor to the Corbets (4,1,7 Minsterley note). Roger is a subtenant of Earl Roger (4,4).}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining two-thirds of a line after the woodland detail, perhaps for the later insertion of other resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,8\tab TREWERN. It lay in Buttington Ancient Parish which was in Montgomeryshire from 1536 (the dissolution of the Marcher lordships) until 1974 and is now in Powys. It lay in "Reweset" Hundred in 1086. Great Domesday }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Alretone }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 was long thought to be Cause, later }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 caput }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
of the Corbet barony, but the case for Trewern has been fully established by Morgan, 'Trewern in Gorddwr', who arrived at the same conclusion independently of J. Lawson (Shropshire Newsletter no. 28 (February 1965) p. 2).}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 Alretone }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is from Old English }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 alra-tun }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 that is '}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 tun }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 among the alders' and occurs in medieval documents as 
}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Halreton}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Allereton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Olreton}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 In the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Close Rolls}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xii. (1261-1264) p. 265, Henry III instructs Gruffydd ap Gwenwynwyn (or }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de la Pole) }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 to restore among other things all the land of Gorddwr to Thomas Corbet, lord of Cause, with the exception of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Botenton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Buttington SJ2408), }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Allereton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hop' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Hope SJ2507), which had been granted by Robert Corbet to Gwenwynwyn son of Owain Cyfeiliog. The
se three vills had been granted by Gruffydd to his wife }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hawys }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Lestrange) and are confirmed as }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Holretun}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 Hoppe}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bodinton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Coiddur }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Gorddwr) in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Welsh Rolls}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , (1279) p. 179. The Inquisition Post Mortem of Hawise is in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v. no. 269, where she is said to have held the manor of }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Botynton}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 with members }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Trewern }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hop }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of the barony of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Cawes. }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 While Cause (4,4,20 Worthen note) rose in importance, Trewern declined. It was in the Corbet Welshr
y of Nether Gorddwr and was lost to the county in the early Middle Ages, probably in the thirteenth century; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v. no. 269; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 202; Davies, 'Lordships and Manors', p. 134; Morgan, 'Montgomeryshire Territorial Divisions', p. 39. For the extent of Over and Nether Gorddwr, see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 600. A member of Trewern may have been 'Great' Wollaston (see 4,4,7 Wollaston note) and others }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wynancton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(Winnington SJ3110), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Trevenamit }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Trefnant SJ3010) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Haregreve }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Hargreaves SJ3110): }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 235; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Placita de Quo Warranto}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 718.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ROGER [* SON OF CORBET *]. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 7}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  links }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rogeri}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 to }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ALRETONE}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Farley omitted it in error.

\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The identification of Roger with Roger son of Corbet is probable in view of the later descent of the manor to the Corbets (4,1,8 Trewern note). Roger is a subtenant of Earl Roger (4,4).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WELSHMEN. There are 67 Welshmen recorded in Domesday Shropshire, excluding the unspecified numbers
 here, in 4,1,12 and in 4,3,42. About half of them occur on manors held by Reginald the sheriff (as is also the case with the Frenchmen: 3b,3 Frenchman note). A large number of them appear in "Merset" Hundred on the border which had been badly devastated,
 
also in "Rinlau" Hundred. In many cases the Welshmen had ploughs of their own or a share in the other villagers' ploughs; sometimes they had both ploughs and paid a money render, sometimes only a money render is recorded (in 4,27,4 the payment of a hawk b
y a Welshman is mentioned). They may have had some pastoral duties. See Gwynne, 'Domesday Society in Shropshire', pp. 91-93; and 4,3,38 Welshmen note on }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Waleis }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 for }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Walenses}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 6 SMALLHOLDERS ... 3 SMALLHOLDERS. See 2,1 smallholders note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab PAID 8s. This corrects the 'paid \'a38' of the Phillimore printed translation and of the previous version of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday Explorer}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,9\tab ALBERBURY. This was an Ancient Parish which later became the parish of Alberbury with Cardeston when two Ancient Parishes were combined. It was }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 caput }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
of "Reweset" Hundred in 1086 and was later in Ford Hundred. As in the case of Minsterley (4,1,7) Alberbury was later held by the Corbets of Cause; the 1086 tenant is probably Roger (son of) Corbet (4,4 Roger note). The first recorded holder under the
 Corbets is Ralph }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Crassus }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ('the Fat') who gave the church to Shrewsbury Abbey between 1141 and 1155: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. 43, 271-72, 316). In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 66a, the holder of 2 hides in}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Albebur'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  is Fulk Fitz Warin of the fee of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Caus. }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
A priory was begun here }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 1221-1226 as a dependency first of Lilleshall then of the Abbey of Grandmont (Knowles and Hadcock, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Medieval Religious Houses}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 103, 125): 2 virgates are held in arms by the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Fratres Grandimontis }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 67a; see also }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 964, 971; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 235, 241; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix. no. 50; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 167a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii. p. 214; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 47, viii. p. 195.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab It is surprisi
ng to find no mention of a church, since there is evidence that there was a Saxon collegiate establishment here before 1066. This church was possibly the minster church for the territory of the royal manor of Alberbury which became the Hundred of "Reweset
"; see \{Introduction: Ecclesiastical Organization\}.
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab A reference to a hedged enclosure may also have been omitted, since the place-name Hayes (SJ3515) in Alberbury derives from one such: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 11.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ROGER [* SON OF CORBET *]. The identification is probable in view of the later descent of the manor to the Corbets (4,1,9 Alberbury note). Roger is a subtenant of Earl Roger (4,4).}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 HIDE. [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday had erased something at the beginning of the second line of this entry and then had written }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ibi i hida}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 there, leaving a space suitable for about five letters after it. As no link-line (compare 4,1,6 king note and 9,1 hides note) was drawn to fill this space it must have been left deliberately like the other sp
aces after the hidage; see 1,5 hide note. It is possible that he had failed to leave a space for the hidage and that the erasure was immediate and of the lordship, which he then re-wrote after the space.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,10\tab [IN WITTERY HUNDRED]. The head is supplied from the entry which follows: 'Wittery Hundred belongs to this manor'.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab CHIRBURY. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Wittery Hundred in 1086 and contained the hundred moot, being later }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 caput }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
of Chirbury Hundred. It had no doubt been an important royal centre. Aethelflaed, King Alfred's daughter and 'Lady of the Mercians', built a fortress here in 915 (Anglo Saxon Chronicle, Mercian Register). See}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 80.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab After King Edward and King William the next recorded holder is Gilbert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Salnerville }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(who may have been enfeoffed by Earl Roger or have been granted the land by the Crown after its forfeiture) who gave the tithes of the church to Shrewsbury Abbey: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. 32, 34, 39, 260). Thereafter it seems to ha
ve been held of the honour of Montgomery by the Bowdler family. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 60a, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Chirbur' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
is already split into a number of parts including 4 carucates held by the prior of Chirbury; other holders owe service at Montgomery castle: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 383; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 361, vi. no. 464, x. no. 188.
\par \tab \tab Among the members of Chirbury were }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Walecote }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Walcot: 4,1,35) held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 89b, and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 342; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wititre }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Wittery SO2798), \'bd}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 hide, held by Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Witit' }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 from Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de la Mora }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 60b; and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Timiburt }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Timberth SO2596) and }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stocton}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Stockton SJ2601) \'bd hide each held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 60b, by Philip }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Smethekote }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 with service at Montgomery; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 965; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 240; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 290, ii. no. 747.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab A priory for Augustinian canons was founded here }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 1200 from Snead: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 162b; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 212; Knowles and Hadcock, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Medieval Religious Houses}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 134; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 165; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii p. 59.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab On the whole manor, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 57.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab KING EDWARD HELD IT. [***]. The 
main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the rest of the line after this statement, perhaps for the hidage to be added or for the hundred head (see 4,1,22 Earl note). However, there is a slight indication of an erasure above the space, though the parchmen
t may just have been rubbed there; compare 4,1,6 king note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 2 CHURCHES WITH A PRIEST. This was probably a minster church established to serve the royal multiple estate of Chirbury which probably once included all the lands that later formed Wittery Hundred: \{
Introduction: Ecclesiastical Organization\}.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WHO HAS. The main scribe of Great Domesday altered }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 q}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  with superscript }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 i }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (= }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 qui}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ) from }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 7}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  ('and').}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,11\tab [IN "MERSET" HUNDRED]. The head is supplied from the entry which follows which reports that "Merset" Hundred belonged to the manor.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab MAESBURY. In 1086 it was }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 caput }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
"Merset" Hundred with which name it is probably connected. It was presumably a very early parish but both parochially and manorially it was displaced by Oswestry (4,1,11 Oswestry note) which gre
w up on its land and Maesbury now lies in Oswestry parish. It is regarded as a member or township of Oswestry in the surveys cited under Oswestry.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Maesbury and Oswestry were taken into Fitz Alan lordship of Oswestry and only returned to Shropshire in 1536.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab REGINALD [* THE SHERIFF *]. See 4,1,11 Oswestry note and 4,3 Reginald note. He gave the 'Church of St Oswald' to Shrewsbury Abbey: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. 33, 38).}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab OSWESTRY. Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lvvre }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 derives}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from Old French }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 L'uuvre}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Modern French }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 L'oeuvre}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
a translation of Latin }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 opus }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in the sense of 'siege-work, fortification', particularly referring to the castle (on which see King, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Castellarium Anglicanum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 427). The place is later known in English as }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Osewaldstreu}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Oswaldestre}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  ('St Oswald's tree'), }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Croesoswald }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in Welsh ('Oswald's Cross') and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Blancmuster}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
a Norman French rendering of the Latin }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Album Monasterium. }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The Oswald from whom the place is named was the King of Northumbria, son of Aethelfrith. He was martyred in 642 at the
 battle of Maserfield (near Oswestry) and a church at Maesbury was dedicated to him, later replaced by a shrine at Oswestry.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Oswestry soon displaced Maesbury in importance and became }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 caput }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 of the Fitz Alan barony of Oswestry (descent from Reginald: 4,3 R
eginald note). The town itself was an important place for parleys between English and Welsh and a depot for military supplies, needed for operations in Wales. The Fitz Alans turned it into a Marcher lordship and it was lost to the county for many years; s
ee \{Introduction: County Boundary\} and \{Introduction: Hundreds\}
. The manor of Oswestry grew to encompass many of the vills held by Reginald in "Merset" Hundred under Earl Roger (4,3,32-43); they accordingly appear together with the actual members of Oswestry in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i no. 812 (of John Fitz Alan), iv. no. 90; in Clough, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Fitz Alan Surveys}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Miscellaneous}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. no. 235; and in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Close Rolls}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Henry III}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  AD 1268-1272}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 504.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Maesbury probably 
included in 1086 the land that became Sychtyn, a township of Llansilin Ancient Parish and Llanyblodwel Ancient Parish, together with part of Llanymynech Ancient Parish, unless these areas were only confirmed on Maesbury and Oswestry in the sixteenth centu
ry at the dissolution of the Marcher lordships.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab A CHURCH. This was probably at Oswestry; see the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, i. pp. 33, 38); Lewis, 'Introduction', }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Shropshire Domesday}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 24. On the possibility that it was the minster church for the territory of the royal manor of Maesbury which became "Merset" Hundred, see \{Introduction: Ecclesiastical Organization\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab A SMALL WOOD. On Latin }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 silua parua}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , see 4,1,4 wood note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ENGELBALD. Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hengebald}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
represents Old German }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Engelbald}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : Forssner, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Continental-Germanic Personal Names}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 71.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,12\tab WHITTINGTON. This was an Ancient Parish. It was in "Merset" Hundred in 1086. It probably came to the Crown after the rebellion of Robert of Bell\'ea
me and was given by Henry I to William Peverel of Dover. It was forfeited by his nephew and granted by Henry II to Geoffrey }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Vere}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
but resumed, then conferred on Roger }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Powis. }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 In the thirteenth century it was held by the FitzWarins and seems to have be
en regarded as a Marcher lordship that had to be rejoined to England in 1536; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 147; the Red Book of the Exchequer (Hall, ii. p. 511); Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 233, xi. p. 29; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 38. The Knights Hospitalers held land here in the late twelfth century.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab A castle built here is first mentioned in 1138; see King, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Castellarium Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 432.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab AETHELRED, KING EDWARD'S FATHER. Aethelred the Unready; he ruled from 978 or 979 to 1016.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THESE THREE MANOR
S. That is, Chirbury, Maesbury and Whittington (4,1,10-12). That they could pay half a night's revenue is indicative of their antiquity and prosperity, and this decline was probably due to devastations wrought by the Welsh under Gruffydd ap Llewelyn; see 
\{Introduction: History\}.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 h' tria M'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 over an erasure; the words are very blurred because the surface of the parchment had not been re-prepared after the erasure.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HALF A NIGHT'S REVENUE. The Latin is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 dimidiam firmam noctis}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; here }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 firma }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 represents Old English }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 feorm}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  ('a food rent'): }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Oxford English Dictionary}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , under }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 farm}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(i). For other meanings of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 firma}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , see 3d,5 revenue note and 4,8,8 revenue note.}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Many royal manors, especially in the south-west, had to 
pay one night's revenue, which generally took the place of the normal tax payment, the manors often not being assessed in hides (though two of these three here and those in HEF 1,1 and GLS 1,9;11; 13 were hidated). Originally this fixed rent meant the amo
unt of food needed to support the king and his household for one night; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Dialogus de Scaccario }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
pp. 40-41; and CAM 1,1 where before 1066 the manor of Soham paid '3 days' revenue in corn, honey and malt and everything else'. However, by the eleventh centur
y these food rents were generally commuted to money payments. From examples in Somerset and Hampshire \'a380 appears to have been a probable figure before 1066, and \'a3100 after, for one night's revenue; see Poole, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Exchequer in the Twelfth Century}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 29; Round, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal England}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 109-15. In WIL1,5;7 also, figures appear of \'a3110 and \'a3
100 for the present value of manors which had paid one night's revenue; the abbreviasted }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 redd' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in these entries is probably to be translated 'paid', rather than 'pays'. In Shropshi
re, however, as in NTH B36 and DEV 1,21, the combined 1086 payments of the three manors fell far short of the \'a350 figure (\'a3100 in the case of Northamptonshire and Devon). It would seem that in}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
some cases (for example DOR 1,2-4.GLS 1,9; 13. WIL 1,2-4) these
 food rents were not commuted, the manors continuing to pay the night's revenue in 1086. See also BDF 1,1;3 where Leighton Buzzard and Houghton Regis continued to pay in 1086 half a day's revenue in 'wheat, honey and other things'.}{\insrsid4139880 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab In Domesday Somerset, 
Dorset and Devon, as apparently here, there are several instances of manors combining to provide this rent: SOM 1,2 revenue note. 1,10 revenue note. DOR B1 revenue note. 1,5 revenue note. This is the only reference to the night's revenue in Shropshire; th
ere is no mention of which manor(s) contributed the other half of the night's revenue.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,13\tab THIS ENTRY was probably included here because it was adjacent to and probably attached to "Merset" Hundred, lands in which had just been detailed (4,1,11-12). However, the main scribe of Great Domesday wrote }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Tuder}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  in capitals and lined it through in red, treatment that he reserved elsewhere for Earl Roger's subtenants in each sub-chapter; see SHR 4 Roger note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [* IN WALES *]. This head has been added to indicate that this land did not lie in "Merset" Hundred.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab TUDUR ... 1 WELSH DISTRICT. Like Welsh lands mentioned at 4,2,1 and 4,3,42 this unnamed 'district' seems to have been attached to "Merset" Hundred and should be looked for in that area. Classical Latin }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 finis }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 i
s a 'boundary, end, limit', but was commonly used in the plural to mean an 'area, land, territory', a sense which seems here to be had by the singular. It appears in Domesday Shropshire to mean either a Welsh 'cantref' (as at 4,1,15) or its subdivision, t
h
e 'commote'. Tudur is probably Tudur (Tewdwr) ap Rhys Sais and his land Nanheudwy in the vale of Llangollen which must have been overrun by Earl Roger's advance to Ial (4,2,1: 4,2,1 Ial note); see Edwards, 'The Normans and the Welsh March', p. 159; Lloyd,
 }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 History of Wales}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ii. p. 389; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 428. Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 48, followed by Lloyd, 'Wales and the Coming of the Normans', p. 160, and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. pp. 287-88, suggests that the land was Maelor Saesneg, but this was probably in Cheshire in 1086; see Tait, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday Survey of Cheshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 24; and \{
Introduction: History\} and CHS \{Introduction: Hundreds\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,14\tab [IN "RINLAU" HUNDRED]. The hundred head is deduced from geographical probability and from the fact that manors in "Rinlau" Hundred in 1086 are usually found in Purslow Hundred in later times; see 4,1,14 Lydham note.
}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab LYDHAM. This was an Ancient Parish. It seems to have been in "Rinlau" Hundred in 1086, later in Purslow Hundred. After escheating to the Crown it was granted to the honour of Montgomery (4,1,15 Montgomery note): in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 175, William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Cantilupo }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (lord of Montgomery) holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lideham}
{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 812, ii. no. 74; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feud
al Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 233. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 77a, the Bishop of Hereford is in possession of 1 \'bd hides of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lideham}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 A place that was detached from Lydham at an early date, probably before the grant to the honour of Montgomery, was }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Mora }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (More SO3491) held in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 77a, by Roger }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Mora }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 by serjeanty: }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 383, 1183, 1243, 1283; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 77a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. nos. 326, 464, iii. no. 240. On the whole manor, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 275.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab EDRIC THE WILD. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Saluage }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 interlined is from Old French }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 salvage}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Modern French }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 sauvage}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  ('wild, untamed') from Late Latin }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 salvaticus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Classical Latin }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 silvaticus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 silva }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
('wood'): his byname appears as }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 siluaticus }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in Orderic Vitalis and John of Worcester among others.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab He was nephew of Edric Streona (Ealdorman of the Mercians, appointed 1007, killed 1017) and cousin of Siward (founder of St Peter's, Shrewsbury) and his brother Aldred (4,27,32 Siward note). Edric he
ld lands in Shropshire and Herefordshire under Edward the Confessor. Though he acknowledged William as king in 1066,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
he joined Kings Bleddyn and Rhiwallon of Gwynedd and Powys in devastating Herefordshire in 1067 and he burnt Shrewsbury in 1069. He submitt
ed to King William in 1070: John of Worcester, iii. pp. 4-5, 14-15, 20-21. The last mention of him is in 1072 when he accompanied King William to Scotland. Many of the references to plain Edric holding in 1066 are probably to Edric the wild, but there are
 
at least two other identifiable Edrics in Shropshire: Edric of Bayston and Edric of Wenlock. It is possible that at the height of his power Edric the wild held as many as 100 hides of land. The estates he held in Herefordshire went to Ralph of Mortimer as
 did some of those he held in Shropshire. Williams, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 The English and the Norman Conquest}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, pp. 91-93, expects to find Edric the wild still holding land in 1086 and, following John of Worcester, is inclined to accept Edric as son of Aelfric, brother of Edric S
treona, and therefore to identify him with Edric of Wenlock (3c,8) whose father was called Aelfric. However, John of Worceser is the only source who gives Edric the wild as a son of Aelfric, and it may be that he made a wrong deduction from the informatio
n he had, including that of Domesday Book. Moreover, there is no reason to think that Edric was still alive in 1086. On Edric, see Orderic Vitalis, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Ecclesiastical History}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (Chibnall, ii. p. 166); Freeman, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Norman Conquest}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. Appendix Note E, pp. 736-38; and \{Introduction: History\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab A MILL WHICH PAYS 1 PIG. This is a very unusual render; see 1,7 mill note for the usual payment received from mills. However, in CAM 5,25 2 mills at 45s pay 2 pigs, which is expanded to '2 mills at 45s \'85
 2 pigs are fattened from the mills' in the corresponding entry in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Inquisitio Comitatus Cantabrigiensis}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  (Hamilton, p. 48); see also CAM 1,2 '2 mills, 16s, feed 2 pigs a year'.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,15\tab [CASTLE]. This entry cannot be governed by the previous hundred head (for "Rinlau", conjectured at 
4,1,14). It is probable, like several castles in Hereford, that it was not regarded as part of any hundred, although its dependencies (4,1,35-36) lay in Wittery Hundred; see, for example, HEF 8,1. 19,1, and HEF \{Introduction: Castles\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab MONTGOMERY. The name Montgomery derives from the place of origin of its founder, Earl Roger of Montgommery; see SHR 4 Roger note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The castle and its lands are surveyed in three entries (see also 4,1,35-36). Montgomery Castle was established beyond Offa's Dyke in an area wh
ere the English had pushed their border into Wales, but which had been so greatly devastated, presumably by Gruffydd ap Llewelyn, that the 52 \'bd}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
hides attached to it had only been used for hunting under King Edward (4,1,35). The first Norman castle is generally accepted to have been at Hen Domen (SO2198): Barker and Higham, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hen Domen}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
; Barker and Lawson, 'Pre-Norman Field System at Hen Domen'.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab After Earl Roger's death the Welsh sacked Montgomery, and after his son's rebellion it came into the hands of Henry
 I as an escheat. He then granted it as an honour (to which were attached a number of lands held by others in 1086) to Baldwin }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Boilers }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 who had married his niece Sibyl }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Faleise}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Boilers }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 died without issue and the land passed to his brother Baldwin II }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Boilers }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
whose heir was William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Courtenay}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 On his death, King John treated it as an escheat and gave it briefly to Thomas }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Erdinton}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 then to William II }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Cantilupo. }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Thereafter, the castle with its immediate appurtenances and the honour were often treated separately, although the holder of the honour was sometimes constable of the castle. A new castle in Montgomery was begun in 1223: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 38. Hubert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Burgo }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 held the honour from 1228 to 1232; Henry III granted it in 1254 to his son}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Edward and it was held for a time by members of the Lestrange family. The castle and the honour suffered much from the depredations of Llewelyn ap Gruffydd 'Prince of Wales' 1246-1282. The holder in 1273-1274 was George }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
de Cantilupo }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 whose sister Millicent conveyed the lands to Eudo }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 La Zouche}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab After 1086 Montgomery was drawn into a Marcher lordship then, following its dissolution, was in Montgomeryshire from 1536 until 1974 and is now in Powys.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HAS 4 PLOUGHS ... HAS 2 PLOUGHS. It is quite possible that }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 car' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in both cases here does not abbreviate }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 carucas}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  ('ploughs'), but }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 carucatas}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  ('carucates'), although when the main scribe of Great Domesday used }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 car'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 to abbreviate }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 carucata }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in its various cases, he normally put }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 t'r\'ea }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 = terrae}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 'of land') after it to distinguish it from }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 caruca}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , though there are exceptions}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Two facts suggest this: firstly, no extent is otherwise given for Montgomery castle although one would expect it for such
 an important place; secondly, in the description of the size of the similar frontier castles of Ewyas Harold and Clifford in Herefordshire (HEF19,1. 8,1) the scribe uses the formula '}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 n}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 carucates' and its equivalent 'land for }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 n }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ploughs'. Against this, however, is the fact that 52 \'bd
 hides were attached to Montgomery castle (4,1,35) and normally land measured in carucates (or the equivalent ploughland expression) was newly-acquired land that had not yet been hidated: C13 hides note. Compare 7,4 servants note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab PENCE. In the manuscript the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 den' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
might have been added as it is partly in the centre margin. The first few words at the beginning of the next line are hard to read because there was a large erasure of some two or three lines on the other side of the fol
io (after 4,1,5) and this shows through the parchment, which is particularly thin here; words have also 'spread' (presumably because the parchment had not been re-prepared after the erasure). The last line of this entry is very rubbed and is just below th
e bottom marginal ruling of the manuscript.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ONE DISTRICT OF WALES. The Latin}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 word}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  finis }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(see 4,1,13 district note) is an unclear term, here meaning 'cantref, a group of 'commotes'. Other Welsh lands mentioned in Domesday Shropshire appear to be attached to
 "Merset" Hundred; see 4,1,13 district note. 4,2,1 Ial note and 4,3,42 districts note. This land within the castlery of Montgomery should be looked for in a different direction. It seems to be the cantref of Arwystli mentioned in Domesday Cheshire (CHS G2
) as held by Earl Roger but claimed by Robert of Rhuddlan:}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 'Robert also claims a hundred, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Arvester }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Arwystli), which Earl Roger holds. The}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Welshmen testify that this hundred is one of the (hundreds) of North Wales'}{\b\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\b\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 
Robert of Rhuddlan had assisted Earl Hugh of Chester in annexing Gwynedd (which was presumably the area meant by 'North Wales' in CHS G2) after the death of Gruffydd ap Llewelyn. Although Arwystli was surrounded by Powys and geographically detached from '
N
orth Wales', it was regarded as part of the latter and lay in the same bishopric as Gwynedd, that of Bangor rather than that of St Asaph's. Thus Earl Roger appears to have occupied it as part of his invasion of Powys, but Robert of Rhuddlan was claiming i
t
 as part of his land of Gwynedd. Arwystli does not adjoin Shropshire and cannot have been contiguous to it in 1086; its annexation implies that Cydewain and Ceri had been taken as a preliminary. Arwystli had been ruled by the prince Trahaearn ap Caradog. 
His death in 1081 at the battle of Mynydd Cam will have given a chance for invasion: Edwards, 'The Normans and the Welsh March', p. 160; Lloyd, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 History of Wales}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
ii. p. 3; Lloyd, 'Wales and the Coming of the Normans', p. 157; Jones, 'Divisions of Montgomeryshire', pp. 77-78; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 172; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. pp. 287; Tait, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday Survey of Cheshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 24; and \{Introduction: History\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WHICH BELONGS. Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 pertinent' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 often abbreviates }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 pertinentes}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 which would be accusative plural agreeing with the (4 ploughs and) \'a36 of pence. However, it is more likely that it refers to the one Welsh district which belongs to Montgomery castle and so }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
pertinen' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 would seem to abbreviate the ablative singular }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 pertinente}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 
ROGER ^[SON OF]^ CORBET. He is called Roger Corbet here and in 4,1,36, but Roger son of Corbet in sub-chapter 4,4 (4,4 Roger note). The omission of 'son of' in a byname occurs occasionally elsewhere in Domesday Book, as in the tenant-in-chief Robert so
n of Fafiton, who appears in HUN 25,1 as such, but as Robert Fafiton in HUN 25, as in Cambridgeshire, Middlesex and Bedfordshire. See also GLS G4 William note on William (son of) Baderon. On the omission of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  before a place-name used as a byname, see 4,8,3 Roger note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 
ROGER ^[SON OF]^ CORBET ... WITH HIS BROTHER ... 40s. This sort of payment might be expected as tribute from a Welsh commote or cantref, possibly Cydewain and Ceri (see 4,1,15 district note). Roger's brother is Robert (4,5 Robert note); both
 held from Earl Roger.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,16\tab [IN "REWESET" HUNDRED]. This head is supplied from the later history of the manor which became }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 caput }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
of "Reweset" Hundred and from which it was renamed Ford.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab FORD. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in "Reweset" Hundred in 1086 and subsequently replaced Alberbury (4,1,9) as the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 caput }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
of the hundred which was renamed Ford. After the forfeiture of 1102, it remained in royal hands until granted in 1155 to Reginald, Earl of Cornwall. It returned to the Crown 1175-1230, then was gi
ven to the Audley family who held it for most of the thirteenth to fifteenth centuries. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 66a, it is recorded that Henry (III) 'son of King John' gave }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Forde }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 to Henry }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Auditheley}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 87a, 96a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 235; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. nos. 97, 196, 285, iii. no. 536, vi. nos. 56, 137, 174; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 180; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, viii. p. 228.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. no. 62, the members, which will have accounted for some of the 14 outliers of 1086, are given as:
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Pontesford }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Pontesford SJ4106);
\par }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab La Lee }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Lea SJ4108); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 196;
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Hanewod }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Little Hanwood SJ4407); see 4,4,14 Hanwood note);
\par }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Espeleye }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Ashlees? SJ4010 or Astley Nook in Pontesford);
\par }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Saxecote }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Sascott SJ4211 );
\par }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Pleyleye }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Plealey SJ4206);
\par }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Sybaskot }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 or }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Sibaldescote }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Sibberscote SJ4207);
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Newenham }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Newnham SJ4110);
\par }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Ardeskote }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Arscott SJ4307);
\par \tab \tab }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Poulemere }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Polmere: 4,27,19);
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Crokton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Cruckton SJ4310); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 827;
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Schrawardyn }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Little Shrawardine SJ3915);
\par }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Benthale }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Benthall: 4,27,20);
\par }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Eggett }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Edge SJ3908), but }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Egge }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 196, iii. no. 560 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 162b;
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Moele }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Mele }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Cruckmeole SJ4209); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, ii. no. 196. This was later counted as a township of Pontesbury (4,4,12): }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 32.
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab Fordesham }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (unidentified) was also a member: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 476.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 15 HIDES [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a space for about six letters after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 xv hid\'ea}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 see 1,5 hide note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab MILL ... 3 "ORAE"; \'bd FISHERY. }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The "ora" was reckoned at both 16d and 20d, the 20d rate generally being thought of as implying payments by tale to allow for clipping, though }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Grierson ('The Monetary System under William I', }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday Book Studies}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 75 (= Erskine and Williams, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The Story of Domesday Book}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 112-13)) thinks a 4d allowance is excessive and payments at 20d were widespread.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 ores }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 here is a very unusual plural: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 or\'ea }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
occurs in 4,1,21 and elsewhere in Great Domesday; the only other reference to the "ora"}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in Shropshire is in 4,1,32 where the ablative plural }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 oris }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 molin' de .iii. oris}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is used, so it is possible that in the original returns the main scribe of Great Domesday misread }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 oris }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (no doubt as a third declension plural }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 ores}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in a phrase such as is used in 4,1,32 and changed the construction accordingly.}{\insrsid4139880 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab In the manuscript there is a small erasure after }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 dimid'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 : it is possible that it was an }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 7}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, although no sign of it (or anything) can be seen, and that the Great Domesday scribe originally thought that the mill paid 3 \'bd "orae"}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
and there was a whole fishery there. However, the mill at 4,1,32 paid 3 "orae"}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
and the other half of the fishery is recorded at 4,4,23 (it was probably a fish-weir across the Severn between Ford and Montford: a fish-weir is still marked on Ordnance Survey maps there). }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, i. pp. 296, 317, and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday Geography of Midland England}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 147, mistranslate the phrases as ' ... 3 \'bd "orae"}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
and a fishery'. The Alecto edition has '3 orae and half a fishery'.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining quarter of a line after the fishery detail, perhaps for the later insertion of the woodland; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,17\tab 
[IN BASCHURCH HUNDRED]. The heading is supplied from the later presence of these four manors (4,1,17-20) in Pimhill Hundred and from geographical probability. Another part of Ness (4,3,52) appears in a group of places in Baschurch Hundred..}{
\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [GREAT] NESS. 
This was an Ancient Parish. It seems to have lain in Baschurch Hundred in 1086, later in Pimhill Hundred. After forfeiture in 1102, it was in royal hands until Henry II gave it briefly to Cadwaladr (died 1172), second son of Gruffydd ap Cynan, Prince of N
orth Wales (1081-1137). About 1157 it was given by Henry II to John }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lestrange }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and like Cheswardine (STS 11,13), with which it is associated in later records, it descended in that family. In }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 75b, John }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Extraneus }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 2 hides from the king in chief. It is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Nesse Le Estrange }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 230, while }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Nesse }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Cheseworthin' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 are held together in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 146, 964; see the Red Book of the Exchequer (Hall, ii. p. 509); }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Pimhill Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 119; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 104b; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 236. In }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 215, the members of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Nesse }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 are given as }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Kinton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(Kinton SJ3719), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Obreton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (unidentified), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hopton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Hopton SJ3820) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wyvelecote }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Wilcott SJ3718); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 187, v. no. 264, vi. no. 248. On the manor as a whole, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 255; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 220.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab EARL MORCAR. He was the son of Algar }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and his wife Aelfeva, grandson of Earl Leofric and brother of Earl Edwin}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . Algar w
as Earl of East Anglia 1051-1052, later of Mercia from about 1057. Morcar was }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 chosen as earl by the Northumbrians when they had deposed Earl Tosti }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (King Harold\rquote 
s brother) in 1065. He submitted to King William, but rebelled twice and was in custody in Normandy at the time of the Domesday Survey.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 5 HIDES. [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a space suitable for about four letters after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 v hide.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 see 1,5 hide note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THE CHURCH OF }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ST PETER [* OF SHREWSBURY *] HOLDS. Shrewsbury Abbey was given the church of Ness by Earl Roger; see the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. 5, 30, 32, 37, 41 etc.); }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 247b. It was a 'superior' church, possibly a minster; see \{Introduction: Ecclesiastical Organization\}.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab A CERTAIN ROBERT. This may have been Robert the butler (4,6) and his land, extent unspecified in Domesday, may have been an outlying part of the manor at }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Weston' }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Weston Lullingfields SJ4224). Robert's lands passed to the honour of Montgomery and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Weston' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 was held in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 76a, from William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Cantilupo }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (lord of Montgomery) under John }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Extraneus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ;}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 it is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Weston super Lechefeld }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pimhill Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , (p. 121); see }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 17.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 4 VILLAGERS. The main scribe of Great Domesday had written }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 uill'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , which could be either }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 uillani}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 (nominative plural) or }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 uillanos}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  (accusative plural): 2,2 villagers note. Scribe B corrected (or clarified) it to }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 uill'os }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (= }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 uillanos}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ) as the accusative case is needed after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 h}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 abe}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ]}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 t}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,18\tab LOPPINGTON. This was an Ancient Parish. It appears to have lain in Baschurch Hundred in 1086 and was later in Pimhill Hundred. After forfeiture in 1102, it was in the king's hands and in the thirteenth century wa
s held by a family named from the place. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 75a, 76b, Richard }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Loppinton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 5 hides in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Loppinton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Burelton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Burlton SJ4626, a member) from the king by knight-service. At a later stage the Abbot of Lilleshall was enfeo
ffed in half of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lopintone }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Le Botiler }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 held under him; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 147, 965 (wrongly listed under the}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of Tournay}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 );}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Rotuli Hundredorum
}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 104b; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 216, 236; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pimhill Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 119; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. nos. 529, 773; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 225. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 230, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lopiton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Borewelton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 are coupled with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Franketon 
}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (see 4,3,49). Burlton itself accounted for 3 hides: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pimhill Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 119. The tithes of Loppington went to Wombridge Priory: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii. p. 194.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab EDRIC THE WILD. See 4,1,14 Edric note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank three-quarters of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,19\tab ELLESMERE. This was a large Ancient Parish. In 1086 it probably lay in Baschurch Hundred and was later notionally in Pimhill Hundred. Because it was close to the Ma
rcher lordship of Oswestry and to Wales and because it was granted from time to time to Welsh princes, it was only marginally in the county in the thirteenth century. For a time it was a separate Marcher lordship. It was held temporarily under Henry I by 
William Peverel of Dover, then conferred on David (Dafydd) }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ab Owain}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
a prince of North Wales, by Henry II (in 1174) when David married the king's sister Emma. The same man held Halesowen, also held by Earl Roger (WOR 14,1); see \{Introduction: County Boundary\}
. For part of the thirteenth century Ellesmere was managed for the king by the sheriff and then by John }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Grey }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 for 15 years from 1253. It is he who holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ellesm'e 
}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in Pimhill Hundred in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 76b, but has withdrawn it from the county
 of Shropshire. It was also held by a member of the Lestrange family late in the thirteenth century. See }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 104b, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 146; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 232. Ellesmere formally returned to the county in 1536 on the dissolution of the Marcher lordships.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The hamlets of}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Colmere }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Colemere 4,25,3) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hampton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (perhaps part of Welshampton: 4,3,54) were part of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Ellesmere }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 according to }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. no. 716. Stockett (in Cockshutt SJ4329) 
and Newton (SJ4234) were also members of Ellesmere, given to Haughmond Abbey: the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, nos. 199, 201, 268, 336-37, 445, 487, 658-59, 681, 804-19, 1169-76, appendix A. i.).
\par \tab \tab Cockshutt (SJ4329) was a chapelry of Ellesmere and became a separate Civil Parish. Dudleston (SJ3438) was also a township and chapelry.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 2 PRIESTS. The church that they served was certainly superior and possibly a minster; see \{Introduction: Ecclesiastical Organization\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining half-line after the mill detail, perhaps for the later insertion of the woodland or other resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab MUNDRED [* THE SHERIFF *]. The Domesday form }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Mundret }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 suggests Old English }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Mundr\'e6d}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see von 
Feilitzen, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 331. He may have been the sheriff of Cheshire of that name (CHS C24); see Mason, 'Officers and Clerks',}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  
}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 p. 246 and note 17; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 299. He is not mentioned at all in Green, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 English Sheriffs}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . This is the only occurrence of this name in Domesday Shropshire.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab REGINALD [* THE SHERIFF *] 1 HIDE. See 4,3 Reginald note; Mason, 'Officers and Clerks',}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 p. 246. The land was at }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lea }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Lee SJ4032) given to Shrewsbury Abbey (the Shrewsbury Cartulary: Rees, pp. xix, 6, 17, 30, 33, 38, 41 etc.); in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 76a, the Abbot of Shrewsbury holds \'bd hide in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Leg'.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 4 VILLAGERS AND 7 SMALLHOLDERS. It is not clear whether }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 uill'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 bord' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
should be extended to the accusative }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 uillanos }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 bordarios }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and be the object of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 h}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 abe}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 nt }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
in the line above; the semi-colon preserves the ambiguity of the Latin abbreviations. Compare 4,1,17 villagers note, 2,2 villagers note. 4,3,29 villagers note. 4,20,8 ploughmen note and 6,11 villagers note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,20\tab 
BERWICK. It was in the Ancient Parish of Shrewsbury St Mary. In 1086 it lay in Baschurch Hundred and was later in Pimhill Hundred. This 'Great' and 'Little' Berwick should be distinguished from Berwick 'Maviston' (4,3,25) in Wrockwardine Hundred. Af
ter the rebellion of Robert of Bell\'eame, possession was resumed by the Crown until it was granted out by Henry I. In the late thirteenth century it was held by the Leybourne family. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 75b, John }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Spenser }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 1 \'bd}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hides from the king in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Berewyk }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 by service in Wales in wartime. Simon }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Leyburne }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Berewecke }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 with members in the }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pimhill Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  (p. 119); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 104b; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 216, 230; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v. no. 95; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, x. p. 213.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The Domesday estate is represented on modern Ordnance Survey maps by Berwick (SJ4714) and Upper Berwick (SJ4715).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab EDRIC THE WILD. See 4,1,14 Edric note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,21\tab [IN WROCKWARDINE HUNDRED]. This hundred heading is restored from later evidence. These three manors (4,1,21-23) subsequently lay in 'Bradford' Hundred. See 4,1,22 Earl note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [HIGH] ERCALL. This was the Ancient Parish of Ercall Magna, also known as High Ercall. It appears to have lain in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. After forfeiture by Robert of Bell\'ea
me, the vill became the property of the Crown, then was granted by Henry I to Hamo Peverel. The Burnell family were mesne tenants in the late thirteenth century. In the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p.
 965, William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Hedleg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ercalu }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 among the fees of Peverel; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 55b; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 222, 237; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iii. no. 194, iv. no. 200. It is qualified as }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ercalewe Magna }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 238, and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v. no. 611. Part of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hercalwe }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 was held by Wombridge Priory in 1255: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 55b; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 194. The demesne tithes of Ercall were given soon after 1086 by Earl Hugh to S
hrewsbury Abbey: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. 7, 8, 11, 296-97). A church, not mentioned in Domesday had already been given by Earl Roger: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. 5, 30, 32 nos. 2, 34, 35 etc.).}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 The }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (p. 118) gives the members of}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Arcall' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Walton' }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Walton SJ5918), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Cotwall' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Cotwall SJ6017), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Osbaston }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Osbaston SJ5918), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 More }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Moortown SJ6117), }
{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wildislond }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (lost) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Shurlow }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Shirlowe SJ6016), this last being held by the prior of Wombridge; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 261a; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 194.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Another member was }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Slepe}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 2 \'bd}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
hides, a gift of Hamo Peverel to the Abbot of Shrewsbury: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 57a; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 228; the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. xix, 27-28, 41 etc.). It was subsequently joined to Crudgington (4,6,5) which had probably been a member of High Ercall in 1066 and certainly had the same }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880  holder.
\par \tab \tab A further fee of Peverel was }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Tirne }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Tern SJ6216) which in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 58a was held by William, l
ord of Tern, and given by him (apart from 1 virgate) to Lilleshall Abbey: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 965; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 118; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 261a; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 iii. p. 197; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 238. The one virgate went to Buildwas Abbey.
\par \tab \tab On the manor as a whole, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 62; Hill, 'The Demesne and the Waste', especially pp. 4-5. For Childs Ercall, see 4,3,23.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 7 HIDES. [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a space suitable for about four letters after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 vii hide.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see 1,5 hide note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining three-quarters of a line after the woodland detail, perhaps for the later insertion of other resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THE COUNTESS. The wife of an earl could use the title 'countess' by virtue of her husband's status. However, it appears that Earl Edwin never married. Indeed, Edwin's re
volt against King William in 1068 was said by Orderic Vitalis, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ecclesiastical History }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(Chibnall, ii. pp. 214-15) to be because William had not fulfilled his promise to give Edwin one of his daughters in marriage. The countess might be Edwin's mother Aelfev
a, wife of Earl Algar, or more probably his grandmother, Countess Godiva, wife of Earl Leofric of Mercia. }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 With her husband, Godiva founded and endowed the monastery at Coventry and endowed St Mary\rquote 
s of Stow. They also made gifts to the abbeys of Leominster, Wenlock, to two abbeys in Chester, St John\rquote s and St Werburgh\rquote 
s and to Evesham. They also gave lands to the church of Worcester. Leofric died in 1057, but Godiva survived into the Conqueror\rquote s reign. She was dead by 1086, but her lands had not yet all been re-granted; see Harmer, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Anglo-Saxon}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Writs}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 561; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 p. 218.}{
\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab BROUGHT TO HER AS A CUSTOMARY DUE. Compare HEF 1,6 where the reeve of Eardisland used to present Earl Morcar's lady, when she came to the manor, with 18 "orae"}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
of pence 'so that she might be happy'.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Farley misprinted the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 P}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 P}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 er}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ] here as lower-case }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 p}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,22\tab WELLINGTON. This was an Ancient Parish. It seems to have lain in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. A 
church, not mentioned in Great Domesday was given to Shrewsbury Abbey by Earl Roger: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. 5, 30, 32 nos. 2, 34, 35 etc.). The vill was probably royal demesne from 1102, following its forfeiture, until 1177-1189 when it was h
eld by Simon son of Simon. William and James, sons of Simon, held from 1192-1194, then Gwion, son of Jonas of Powys, from 1194-1210 in which year it was granted to Thomas of Erdington. Hugh Burnell had the overlordship by 1283. Thus in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 56a }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wellinton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is said to be held by Egidius }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Herdinton' }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 having been given by King John to Thomas }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Herdinton'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see the Red Book of the Exchequer (Hall, ii. p. 510); }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 146; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 227; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. no. 337, v. no. 611, viii. no. 667. The manor is coupled with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Scayebur' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Shawbury 4,23,3) in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 964; see }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 827.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Wellington had a number of members. Dawley (see below) had already been severed by 1086. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Aston }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Aston SJ6109, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Aston subtus Wreken }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 189; see 3b,2 Eyton note) was given to Shrewsbury Abbey }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
.l 144 (the Shrewsbury Cartulary: Rees, pp. xix, 43, 44, 48, 50-51, 54-55 etc.). 1 hide and the mill at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Walcote }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (
Walcot SJ5911; possibly a member of Wrockwardine in 1086; see 4,1,1 Wrockwardine note) was given to Haughmond Abbey at about the same time; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 57a; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 228; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 260a; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. nos. 376-77, 379; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 218. Three hides at Aston had already been granted by King Edgar in 975 to his }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 minister }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Ealhhelm: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Early Charters of the West Midlands}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , no. 432 (= Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , no. 802); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, xi. p. 217. After 1086 it was sometimes counted as a member of the abbey's manor of Eyton-on-Severn; see 3b,2 Eyton note. Eyton (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 57 on) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
VCH Shropshire }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (xi. pp. 216-17) also include Apley (SJ6512), Arleston (SJ6110; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, v. no. 611) and Dothill (SJ6412) as members of Wellington. On the whole manor, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 40; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, xi. pp. 215-18. On Orleton as a possible member of Wellington in 1086, see 4,11,18 Isombridge note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab EARL EDWIN HELD IT, [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining half of the line after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 tenuit }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
which has no dot after it. There is no sign of an erasure as there is in the similar gap in 4,1,6 and, possibl
y, also in 4,1,10; see 4,1,6 King note and 4,1,10 King note. It was probably left for a hundred head (which normally occupies this position in an entry), though a space should have been left, and an insertion made, in the previous entry (4,1,21 Wrockwardi
ne note). See 4,6,6 Wulfric note, 4,11,19 Earl note, 4,20,17 Almund note and 4,21,14 Genust note, but compare 4,14,25 Gamal note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining three-quarters of a line after the fisheries detail, perhaps for the later insertion of the woodland or other resources; see \{
Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WILLIAM [* PANDOLF *]. William was William Pandolf since after the cessation of Robert of Bell\'eame's overlordship the manor went to the Pandolf barony of W
em, being held under the lords of Wem by a younger branch of the family. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 964, the heirs of Alan }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Panton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(i.e. Pandolf) hold 1 fee in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Dalileg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Tibricton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Tibberton: 4,7,2) of the barony of Wem; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 58a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 237; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 41; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 317 note 29, xi. p. 112; and 4,14,4 Wem note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab DAWLEY [MAGNA]. Dawley was a chapelry of Shifnal, then an Ancient Parish which contained Dawley Magna and Dawley Pa
rva (4,3,28), both at SJ6806, now forming the nucleus of the borough of Telford. It was in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086 and later in 'Bradford' Hundred. It became part of the Pandolf barony of Wem:}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  VCH Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 112.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,23\tab EDGMOND. This was an An
cient Parish. In 1086 the place lay in Wrockwardine Hundred and was later in 'Bradford' Hundred. Earl Roger founded a church here possibly between 1086 and his death and gave it to Shrewsbury Abbey: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. 5, 30, 32 nos. 2, 34
, 35 etc.); }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 248a. The rest of the manor was forfeited to the Crown in 1102 following his son's rebellion and was given early in the thirteenth century to Henry de Audley. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 221, Nicholas }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Audetheleye }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Egemundun }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 with members from the king; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum
}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 58b, 65a, 94b-96a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 146; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. nos. 97, 196, 476, iii. no. 409, v. no. 62, vi. no. 56; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 227. The }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 114, gives the members as }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Adeney }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Adeney SJ7018), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Magna Aston }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Parva Aston }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Chetwynd and Church Aston SJ7417, 7517; see 4,8,12 Plaish note and 4,19,2 Chetwynd note), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Parva Halis }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Little Hales SJ7416), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pickestoke 
}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Pickstock SJ7223), together with the town of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Newporte }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(Newport SJ7419). Of these Adeney had been given by King John to the Abbey of Croxden in Staffordshire (Knowles and Hadcock, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Medieval Religious Houses}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 107) before the rest of the manor went to the Audley family. It was later exchanged with the}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Abbot of Buildwas for Caldon Grange in Staffordshire: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum
}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 65a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 260b; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 191; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 114; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 146. Part of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Aston Magna }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(Chetwynd Aston), two virgates, went to the Abbot of Shrewsbury (it is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Monke Aston juxta Newporte }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii. p. 189),}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  one }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 virgate to Lilleshall Abbey (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 65b). Newport (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Novus Burgus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 was a royal borough, but passed with Edgmond to the Audleys: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 147; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. nos. 97, 196, 285, 476. On the whole manor, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 114.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Church Aston had originally been granted by charter in 963 with Plaish: 4,8,12 Plaish note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab YOUNG LEOFWIN. Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 cilt}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 interlined above }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Leuuin'}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is from Old English }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 cild}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
'childe', 'born to an inheritance', 'well-born': Leofwin was a young nobleman. See Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 244-45. He may be the same as Leofwin }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 cilt }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in BDF 12,1 who was the son of Edwin of Caddington; see BDF 12,1 Caddington note; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Hertfordshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 281; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Derbyshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 322.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 11 PLOUGHS POSSIBLE THERE. In Domesday the Latin}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  poss' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 can abbreviate either the indicative }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 possunt }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
or the subjunctive }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 possent }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (as in 4,1,22;25-26 etc.). If it abbreviates the latter the translation should be}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
'11 ploughs would be possible there'; see 1,4 ploughs note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,24\tab [IN "ALNODESTREU" HUNDRED]. It is likely that there is a change of hundred here, since the next two places later lay in Brimstree Hundred.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab TONG. This was an Ancient Parish, originally collegiate. It probably lay in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086 and was later in Brimstree Hundred. Land at }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Twongan }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
was left to Aethelric for his lifetime but for the ultimate benefit of Burton Abbey in the will of Wulfric Spot }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . 1003: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Early Charters of the West Midlands}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 149 no. 144 (= Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , no. 1536 = }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Charters of Burton Abbey}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, no. 29). This was possibly at Tong in Shropshire but, if so, there is no other trace of any connection with Burton Abbey. It might have been Tonge in Leicestershire. In the absence of documentary evidence to decide the question, it hinges on th
e likely development of the place-name; here the evidence is equivocal: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Charters of Burton Abbey}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. xxvii; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 293.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab After the forfeiture of Tong in 1102 it was granted to Richard }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 deBelmeis}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bishop of London, and was later he
ld from La Zouche, from de Braose or the honour of Brecknock (see Sanders,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  English Baronies}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 21-22). In the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 147 (escheats of Gerard }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Thurnay}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ),}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Roger La }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Zusche }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Thonke}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 once a fee of William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Browus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 225, Fulk }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
de Penebrugge }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Togge }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Norton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Tong Norton SJ7908) from the honour of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Breyseynoc}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 234; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 305. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 244 }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Tonge }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is coupled with }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Donynton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Donington: 4,1,25).}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Rokeleye }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(Ruckley SJ7706) was part of this manor, given to the Abbey of Buildwas by Philip }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Belmeis}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 : }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 260b; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 iii. p. 191. The church of Tong, not mentoned in Domesday, was given by Earl Roger to Sh
rewsbury Abbey: the Shrewsbury Cartulary: Rees, pp. 5, 30, 32 nos. 2, 34, 35 etc.). On the whole manor, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 191.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining three-quarters of a line after the woodland detail, perhaps for the later insertion of other resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,25\tab DONINGTON. This was an Ancient Parish. It seems to have lain in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086 and was later in Brimstree Hundred.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Donington appears to have been held by one Wulfgeat of Donington in the late tenth century. In his will dating from }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . 975 (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Early Charters of the West Midlands}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 149 no. 122 = Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , no. 1534) he gives to the church of Worcester a brewing 
of malt of which half comes from Donington and half from Kilsall (in Donington). To his wife he gives lands in Kilsall and in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hrodene}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 (possibly Roden in High Ercall, 4,1,21, or Roden, part of Rodington, 4,3,31) and to his daughter Wulfgifu land in Donington. To her son he gives Ingardine (4,14,28). To (the manor of) Donington he gives the spring at }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 wic}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , probably a salt spring, and associated houses and rights at Droitwich in Worcestershire; 4,1,25 salt-houses note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab After 1086 Donington at first followed the same descent as Tong (4,1,24 Tong note), being held, after Robert of Bell\'eame's forfeiture, by Richard }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 deBelmeis}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 later it is held of the barony of Herbert son of Peter. Thus in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 966, Walter }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Beumes }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Doninton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 of that barony; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 244. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 226, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Doninton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
together with }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Culushall }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Shakerlowe }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Kilsall SJ7906 and Shackerley SJ8106) are held by John }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Beaumes }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from Roger 
}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de la Souche}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 236; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. no. 265, v. no. 458; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 173. There is a Beamish farm at SJ8204, that presumably preserves the name of the family. A church here, which is not mentioned in Domesday, was given t
o Shrewsbury Abbey by Earl Roger: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. 5, 30, 32 nos. 2, 34, 35 etc.).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 3 HIDES [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the rest of the line after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii hid\'ea}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see 1,5 hide note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 5 SALT-HOUSES. The term }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 salina }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 inclu
des all kinds of salt-workings from coastal pans to the boilers of Worcestershire and Cheshire, with their associated sheds and buildings; 'salt-house' is the most comprehensive term. See WOR 1,3a brine-pits note and WOR 1,3a "hocci" note on salt-extracti
o
n and WOR 1,3a Droitwich note for a list of the references to salt-workings in Droitwich, both in Worcestershire itself and in other counties where certain landholders had shares in the Droitwich salt-houses or salt-rights were attached to certain manors.
 Apart from the 5 salt-houses recorded in this entry, there is one in 4,1,26, also in Droitwich, which pays 2s, and in 4,11,4 there is a reference to 4 packloads of salt from Droitwich; see also 6,9 Kinlet note. See also \{Introduction: Salt\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining third of a line after the salt-houses detail, possibly for the later insertion of further resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,26\tab THIS ENTRY was written by the main scribe of Great Domesday around the now-repaired holes in the parchment mentioned in 3h,1 this entry note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [IN PATTON? HUNDRED]. It seems necessary to supply an "Alnodestreu" hundred head at 4,1,24 above Tong. Ditton Priors could have been in that hundred in 1086, but a Patt
on head seems preferable since Ditton Priors was in Munslow Hundred later and no "Alnodestreu" places seem certainly to have followed this course. It is possible, however, that Ditton Priors moved to Patton Hundred when it was granted to Wenlock Priory, w
hich had its most important holdings in that hundred.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab DITTON [PRIORS]. This was an Ancient Parish. It was later counted in Munslow Hundred, or in the Liberty of Wenlock
. This manor was forfeited with others in 1102 and was held by the Crown until Henry II granted it, together with 'Corfham' and Culmington (4,1,6;29), to Hugh }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Periers }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
early in his reign and by this Henry to Wenlock Priory; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 146; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 85a, 110a; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 228; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 164a, 166a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii. p. 215; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 329; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}
{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 305.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 4 OUTLIERS. Two of these outliers will have been Middleton Priors (SO6290), which followed the descent of the main manor, and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Esfeld}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Eysfeld }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 or }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Effeld }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Ashfield SO5889) in}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Munslow Hundred which was detached from Ditton probably under Henry I and became a serjeanty: Adam }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Beisin }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 7. Another outlier or outliers will probably have been Great and Little Hudwick (SO6292). See }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 70b, 72b; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 224; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 346; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 305 .}{
\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,27\tab [IN "CULVESTAN" HUNDRED]. Presumably in view of its later status as a free-manor, Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, xii. pp. 17-28, inclined to consider Stretton as extra-hundredal. On the other hand, Siefton and Culmington (4,1,28-29) must have lain in the body of "C
ulvestan" Hundred and the insertion of that heading above 4,1,27 will associate Stretton with the adjacent Cardington and Hope Bowdler (4,3,44. 4,22,2) which Domesday says explicitly were in that hundred in 1086, forming a detached portion of it. Like oth
er places in "Culvestan" Hundred in 1086, it lay in Munslow Hundred later.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [CHURCH] STRETTON. Church Stretton was an Ancient Parish and included All Stretton, Little Stretton and the area loosely called 'Strettondale'. It is likely that Stretton was in "Cu
lvestan" Hundred in 1086 since it was later in Munslow Hundred, and that this 8-hide holding included Little Stretton and All Stretton as well. After forfeiture by Robert of Bell\'eame, it was a royal manor and was granted successively to Henry }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Burgo}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 to Henry de Hastings, to Hamo Lestrange and to Hawise, wife of Griffin (Gruffydd) }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de la Pole }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (see 4,1,8 Trewern note). It was also held briefly by the Mortimers of Wigmore; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 147; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 83b-84b; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xii. p. 17; and 4,28,4 Minton note. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 229, Church Stretton is called }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Strettonesdale }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Stretton en le Dale) and held by the Earl of Arundel. The name is that of the valley and occurs both as that of a manor and a district: }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. pp. 286-87, iii. p. 230; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 89.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 8 HIDES [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a gap suitable for about five letters after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 viii hid\'ea}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see 1,5 hide note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WOODLAND. See }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 95.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,28\tab 
SIEFTON. This lay in Culmington Ancient Parish (see 4,1,29). It lay in "Culvestan" Hundred in 1086, later in 'Corfham' manor, Munslow Hundred. A third of the tithes went to Earl Roger's church at Quatford (4,1,32 Quatford note), a virgate to
 Haughmond Abbey (see the Haughmond Cartulary: Rees, nos. 234-39, 270; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 65; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 163b; }
{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii. p. 192) and 1 \'bd virgates to Clifford Priory. Otherwise it followed the same descent as 'Corfham
' (4,1,6) with which it is later associated; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 193.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 5 HIDES. [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the rest of the line after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 v hid\'ea.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see 1,5 hide note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank half a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,29\tab CULMINGTON. This was an Ancient Parish. It was in "Culvestan" Hundred in 1086, later in 'Corfham' manor, Munslow Hun
dred. Like Siefton (4,1,28), it had the same descent as 'Corfham' (4,1,6 'Corfham' note); similarly a third of its tithes went to Earl Roger's church of Quatford (4,1,32 Quatford note). A member of Culmington was Burley (SO4781); see Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v. pp. 181, 190.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a third of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,30\tab [IN 'CONDITRE' HUNDRED]. The inserti
on of this hundred head above Stottesdon is linked to the possible insertion of a head above Overton (4,11,16) which lies a little to the north. Stottesdon lies at the end of a group (4,1,27-29) of places in "Culvestan" Hundred and 4,1,31-33 are probably 
i
n "Alnodestreu" Hundred. Stottesdon could not have lain in "Culvestan" Hundred, but it could conceivably have been in "Alnodestreu" if Overton was. The places that lie closest to Overton, that is Neenton, Middleton Scriven, Glazeley, 'Fouswardine', Sidbur
y
, Aston Boterell and Pickthorn, all appear to have lain in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086, yet Overton (at 4,11,16) falls at the end of a 'Conditre' hundred group, places that lay in "Alnodestreu" Hundred having already been entered (4,11,5-10), though bel
o
w an erroneous Baschurch hundred heading. If Overton were in 'Conditre' Hundred, it would either have been a detachment of it, separated by Pickthorn and Aston Boterell, or have been reached by a narrow corridor of land. However, a further argument for Ov
erton's being in 'Conditre' Hundred is that it was a member of Stottesdon Ancient Parish and may even have been its 'upper' }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 tun}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
. It would be topographically awkward if Overton were placed in 'Conditre' Hundred as an outlier and an "Alnodestreu" hundred head
 inserted above Stottesdon at 4,1,30. It also ignores the fact that lay landholdings are rarely detached in this way in Great Domesday. Moreover, the lost place-name 'Conditre', which was the moot-site, lay in Walton in Stottesdon (}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 
2), so it seems that Stottesdon must be placed in 'Conditre' Hundred and it appears probable, despite the topographical difficulty, that Overton belonged in that hundred as well. This tidies up the sequence of hundreds in 4,11. The solution adopted in the
 Phillimore printed edition was to put Stottesdon in 'Conditre' Hundred and Overton in "Alnodestreu" Hundred, restoring an "Alnodestreu" hundred head at 4,11,16. The solution adopted here follows that chosen for the Alecto edition.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab STOTTESDON. This was an Ancient Parish. It probably lay in 'Conditre' Hundred in 1086 and was later the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 caput }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of Stottesdon Hundred. After Robert of Bell\'ea
me's rebellion, it fell to the Crown and was granted }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . 1159 to Geoffrey }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Gamaches}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
de Gamages }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Stottesdone }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in the Red Book of the Exchequer (Hall, ii. p. 510), while in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 147, it is described as an escheat of Matthew }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Gamaches}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Like Stretton (4,1,27) it had a variety of later holders: 4 hides are held by John }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Plessy }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i
i. p. 81a, while John }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Segrave }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and his wife Christiana hold in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 218; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 964; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 107b; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 231, 242; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. no. 699, x. no. 116.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The hidage of Stottesdon had been reduced before the grant to Geoffrey }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Gamaches}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
by the removal of several of its outliers. In 1255 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 82b) Philip }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Beggesoure }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 held 4 virgates in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Berdel' }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Bardley SO6980) and Thomas }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Berdel' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 held 2 virgates there; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 108a; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 218, 232; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 446, ii. nos. 259, 808, iii. no. 206. Similarly in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 82a, Walter }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Baskervill }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and Philip }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Gerros }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 held 6 virgates and \'bd virgate respectively in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Northwod }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(Northwood SO6784). In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 82a, Robert, son of Adam }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Beyssi }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (or }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Beysin)}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , holds 1 \'bd
 hides by serjeanty in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wyrketon'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 which is called}{\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Workiton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Walkeslowe }
{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Wrickton SO6485 and Walkerslow SO6586) in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 108a; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 7; the Red Book of the Exchequer (Hall, ii. p. 453); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 217, 231; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. nos. 503, 557, vi. no.}{
\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 168, x. no. 663.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Two further outliers were }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Newton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Newton SO6585) where two-thirds of the demesne tithes were given (with those of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Walkeslawe) }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
by Earl Roger's son Hugh to Shrewsbury Abbey (the Shrewsbury Cartulary: Rees, pp. 7-8; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 82b), and Dowles (SO7776) formerly called }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Achisey }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hakieshey}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  were}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 given to Guy son of Helgot and by him to Great Malvern Priory (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 448 no. iii, called }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Boules }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 on p. 450 no. ix); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
iii. pp. 238, 240; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 160-61. Dowles is now in Worcestershire.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab On the whole manor see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 142.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 9 HIDES [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a gap suitable for about five letters after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ix hid\'ea}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 see 1,5 hide note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab FREEDMEN. The Latin is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 coliberti}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
former slaves. This is a continental term, not otherwise found in England and used in Great Domesday to render a native term, stated on three occasions to be (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ge}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
bur}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : WOR 8,10a. HAM l,10;23. The }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 coliberti }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 are found mainly 
in the counties in Wessex and western Mercia, particularly in Wiltshire and Somerset. Apart from the 6 freedmen here, only seven other freedmen are mentioned in Shropshire (in 5,1, another manor in the south-east of the county); on both occasions they are
 entered at the end of the list of population and seem to have had a share in the ploughs recorded. In other counties in Great Domesday some held land (SOM 2,1 etc.) and paid dues (HEF 1,6. WOR 8,7 etc.). See Vinogradoff, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
English Society in the Eleventh Century}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 468-69; Maitland, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday Book and Beyond}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 36-37, 328-30; and OXF 1,6 boor note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining quarter of a line after the woodland detail, perhaps for the later insertion of another resource; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab CHURCH OF ST PETER [* OF SHREWSBURY *] HOLDS \'85 2 \'bd HIDES. The church and the land had been given to Shrewsbury Abbey by Earl Roger: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. 5, 30, 32 nos. 2, 34, 35). The 2 \'bd hides w
ere at Duddlewick (SO6583), Hinton (SO6582) and Prescott (SO6681): the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. 30, 32); }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 189. Of these, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Dudelwyk }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 accounted for 1 \'bd hides; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 82b; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 218.}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab On the possibility that this was the minster church for the territory of the Hundred of 'Conditre', see \{Introduction: Ecclesiastical Organization\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,31\tab THIS ENTRY and the next one (4,1,32) were written by the main scribe of Great Domesday using a paler i
nk than for the preceding entries in this column, though the pen seems to be the same. He may have had a break at this point. The less likely alternative would be that he left a space suitable for about 11 lines after 4,1,30 before entering the details of
 Montgomery castle (4,1,35).}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 
[IN "ALNODESTREU" HUNDRED]. A hundred head is needed here or at 4,1,30 (see 4,1,30 Hundred note) since geographically Chetton and Eardington can scarcely have been in any hundred other than "Alnodestreu" in 1086. Eardington mig
ht possibly have been in Patton Hundred as an outlier like Beckbury (4,26,5) so long as it belonged to the Church of Wenlock.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab CHETTON. This was an Ancient Parish. It probably lay in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086 and was later in Stottesdon Hundred. One th
ird of the tithes here were given to Earl Roger's collegiate church of Quatford (4,1,32 Quatford note) and the manor went first to the king, on being forfeited, then was given to a family called }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Broc}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 owing to the disputed inheritance of Sibyl }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Broc}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 the king held the manor for a time, then gave it to Robert Fitz Corbet. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 82a, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Chetyton }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is in the hands of the king, with Stephen }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Butereleq' a provisional tenant. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 108a, William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Corbet }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 217, 231; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. nos. 317, 365, ii. no. 498, iii. no. 194; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 164; Purton, 'Manor of Chetton'.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Sibyl }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Broc }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 gave the mill here to the Benedictine nuns of Brewood: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 83a; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 162a; and see also 4,25,6 woodland note.
\par \tab \tab Chetton later had a detached chapelry at Loughton (SO6183), though this may have been part of Wheathill (4,8,16) in 1086.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab COUNTESS GODIVA. See 4,1,21 countess note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,32\tab THIS ENTRY might have been added; see 4,1,31 entry note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab EARDINGTON. This was a later chapelry and township of Quatford Ancient Parish, a reversal of the 1086 situatio
n in which Quatford was attached to Eardington. It was probably in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086, later in Stottesdon Hundred. Earl Roger granted it to his collegiate church at Quatford: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 82a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 219, 231; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. pp. 103, 117.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab An early detachment was probably }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Mora }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Moor in Eardington), 1 virgate held by serjeanty: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 82a; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 219; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 126.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ST MILBURGA'S. Millichope was subsequently given to the church by Earl Roger in exchange for Eardington; see 4,1,32 Quatford note, SHR 3c St Milburga note and 4,21,3 Millichope note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 5 HIDES. [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a gap suitable for about four letters after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 v hid\'ea.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 see 1,5 hide note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab A NEW HOUSE; A BOROUGH CALLED QUATFORD. Quatford is now a parish. It lay on a narrow strip of land east of the River Severn in an area that was otherwise in Staffordshire in 1086, although soon transferred to Shropshi
re; see \{Introduction: County Boundary\}
. This strip of land ran from the north of Bridgnorth to the south of Quatford, being four kilometres long and no more than a kilometre wide. It had presumably been carved out of the Staffordshire manor of Quatt (erro
neously entered in WAR 12,8) on land that Earl Roger also held. It was probably he who transferred the land to Eardington and to Shropshire for the construction of a borough and a church.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The significance of the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 domus }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is unclear: it was possibly a }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 domus defensabilis }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(a 'fortified house'; see HEF 10,46. 25,9) and thus the predecessor of the Norman castle at Quatford. The }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 domus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 could also be a religious 'house', for Earl Roger founded a collegiate church here, the precursor of the College of St Mary Magdale
ne in Bridgnorth whither his son Robert moved the college to his castle there in 1098. A memorandum concerning the foundation survived in an eighteenth-century transcript }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 which was }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 used by Eyton (}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiqities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 109). A facsimile of this transcript is given in Wasey, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ancient Churches}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see Thompson and Maxwell, }{
\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 College of St Mary Magdalene}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 1-4; Knowles and Hadcock, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Medieval Religious Houses}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 417, 421}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
. St Mary Magdalene's was given Eardington (except for the land of Walter the smith a
nd that on which Quatford stood), the church of Claverley (STS 8,1) and its land (Ludstone; see STS 8,1 Claverley note), the churches and tithes of Alveley (STS 8,3), Kingsnordley (STS 8,2), Bobbington (STS 11,43; see \{Introduction: County Boundary\}
, the w
hole tithes of Leaton (4,1,1 Wrockwardine note) and one third of the tithes of Morville (4,1,5), Chetton (4,1,31), Stottesdon (4,1,30), 'Corfham' (4,1,6), Culmington (4,1,29) and Siefton (4,1,28). Wenlock Priory was compensated by the gift of Millichope (
4,21,3). This church of St Mary Magdalene was given by Roger's second son Hugh to the Abbey of La Sauve Majeure near Bordeaux: Round, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Documents}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  France}
{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , nos. 1234, 1237; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 i. no. 410; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 123-28; Mason, 'Norman Earls of Shrewsbury'; Thompson and Maxwell, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 College of St Mary Magdalene}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
. The castle was also replaced by one at Bridgnorth by Earl Robert: Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i p. 104; Mason and Barker, 'Norman Castle at Quatford': 4,1,5 Mo
rville note. 4,3,68 Oldbury note and \{Introduction: History\}.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WHICH PAYS NOTHING. The Latin }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 burg}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 um}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Quatford dictu}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 m}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  nil redd'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  may}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 possibly be expanded to }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 burgum Quatford dictum nil reddere}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  and translated 'the Borough of Quatford stated (i.e. in the original returns) to pay nothing'. In 4,1,11 and 4,2,1, however, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
nil redd'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  almost certainly abbreviates }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 nil reddens}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  or }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 nil reddentem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , depending on whether }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 burgum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  here is from }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 burgum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  (neuter) or }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 burgus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 (masculine). The Alecto edition has 'a borough called Quatford, rendering nothing'.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab NOW 30s. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 xxx solid'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  in a darker ink than he had used for the rest of the entry.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,33\tab THIS ENTRY and the next one (4,1,34), 
both unrubricated, were added later in a paler ink by the main scribe of Great Domesday in the same campaign as all the unrubricated entries in Shropshire and some in other circuits; see 3c,14 entry note. These two entries were compressed into a small spa
ce that had been left after Earl Roger's lordship holdings and before the details of Montgomery castle and a summary of the earl's manors in Shropshire and their revenue. The }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 I}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  of }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ipse}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  in 4,1,33 is in the inner margin, while the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 I }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 In}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  in 4,1,34 is the sam
e size as the initial letter }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 I}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  (of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ipse}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Isd}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 em}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ] etc.)}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
at the beginning of new sections and extends down to 'enclose' the second line of this entry. The ink used for 4,1,34 is slightly darker than for 4,1,33, probably because the scribe re-dipped his pen in ink, rather than because it was added even later.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab "BOLEBEC".}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 This place, presumably in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086, has not been identified. Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 126, without citing good evidence, identified it as The Moor in Eardin
gton; see 4,1,32 Eardington note. However, as the main scribe of Great Domesday frequently omitted hundred heads in added entries, especially unrubricated ones (3c,14 entry note), there is no guarantee that it was governed by the "Alnodestreu" hundred hea
d inserted at 4,1,31.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab LAND FOR 1 PLOUGH. On the use of this plough estimate formula in this part of the text of Shropshire, see 1,5 plough note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,34\tab THIS ENTRY and the previous one (4,1,33) were added later by the main scribe of Great Domesday; see 4,1,
33 this entry note. It is a slightly shorter version of a holding that had already been recorded in sub-chapter 4,27 (which contains the lands of miscellaneous tenants of Earl Roger) at 4,27,14, where Siward is said to have been the tenant in 1086, as in 
1
066. He may have surrendered the tenancy or it was taken from him, upon which the land would have become part of 4,1 (Earl Roger's demesne) until granted out to another subtenant. Another possibility is that during a check, it was discovered that Siward w
as only the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 holder. The omission of the hundred head (especially common in unrubricated added entries; see 3c,14 entry note and compare 6,28 entry note and 6,32 entry note) when the entry in 4,27,14 is in a run of places in Condover Hundred, may sugg
est that the source of this added entry was different. For other added entries that were duplicates, see 4,12,1 and 6,32 and, perhaps, 7,2.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [IN CONDOVER HUNDRED]. The hundred head is supplied from the duplicate of this entry at 4,27,14; see 4,1,34 Overs note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 
OVERS. This estate lay in Wentnor Ancient Parish. In the duplicate entry (4,27,14; see 4,1,34 entry note) Overs lies in a group of places in Condover Hundred. Overs has no later independent history - it may have been absorbed by Ratlinghope (4,5,2) w
hich is adjacent and which Siward also held before 1066; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Placita de Quo Warranto}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 718; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, vi. p. 296. The suggestion of Morgan, 'Montgomeryshire Territorial Divisions', p. 29, that }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ovre }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 may be Roveries (SO3292) granted
 with Hyssington and Snead to the priory of Chirbury is unlikely to be correct because }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ovre }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
lay in Condover Hundred in 1086, whereas Roveries would have been in Wittery Hundred and probably among the lands attached to Montgomery (4,1,35-36). But Roveries is the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Oures }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of the }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Charter Rolls (1226-1257)}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 pp. 60-61, to which the Welsh definite article }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Yr}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  was later}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 prefixed.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab SIWARD [* THE FAT *]. }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The Domesday forms of this name - }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Siuuard}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Seuuard}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (}{
\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ), }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Seuuar}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Seiard}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ), }{
\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Seiar }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 - represent either Old English }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Sigeweard}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  or, probably in most of the Danelaw counties, the Old Danish }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Sigwarth}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 361-63. JRM preferred the form Siward as it is in regular use. The Alecto edition also has Siward.
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 See 4,1,34 entry note and, on Siward [the fat] being the brother of Aldred and the son of Aethelgar and cousin of Edric the wild (4,1,14 Edric note), see 4,27,32 Siward note.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Siward is a common name among }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  landowners, but not 
among post-Conquest survivors; those holding the same lands at both dates being rare. Five of the ten such occurrences are in Shropshire (4,27,11;14;32. 5,8-9), and a sixth holding (4,8,9) has the Lacy connection associated with manors held by Siward [the
 
fat] before the Conquest (7,3-4;6). Siward [the fat]'s patronage of St Peter's abbey makes it probable that he is the Siward of Upton Magna (4,3,24), an abbey estate acquired by Reginald of Bailleul, who also inherited twelve other holdings held by a Siwa
rd }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 (4,3,1;23;33-34;38;41;43;51-53;57;59) and it is likely that the bulk of these holdings had been held by Siward [the fat] though it is impossible to be certain in individual cases. Since Earl Roger had granted estates held by Siward [the fat] to Ra
lph of Mortimer (4,27,11;14;32), it is likely that the Siward who preceded Ralph on the estates he held from the Crown is the same individual (6,1;18).}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  See Williams, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
English and the Norman Conquest}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 93-96; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 421 (JP).}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,35\tab MONTGOMERY. Details of the castle of Montgomery have already been given at 4,1,15; see 4,1,15 Montgomery note. These two entries, which rightly belong with the earlier one, enumerate the 50 \'bd
 hides now dependent on the castle. They are in two groups: firstly those 
held by Earl Roger himself which have not changed from being waste since 1066 (4,1,35); secondly those held largely by Roger (son of) Corbet and which in 1086 had a value which marks their recovery (4,1,36). Many of these lands lie beyond the modern count
y
 boundary and several lie beyond Offa's Dyke. That they are hidated implies that the English settlement is long-standing and the dependence on Montgomery is probably only a recent convenience. They had probably been settled by the English early in the cen
tury and the wasting was due to the depredations of Gruffydd ap Llewelyn that had rendered them only fit for hunting: \{Introduction: History\}.
\par \tab \tab Most of the dependencies subsequently formed part of the honour of Montgomery or of the barony of Cause (descent
 from Roger son of Corbet, 4,4). Edderton, Forden, Hem, 'Thornbury' (The Gaer), 'Woodluston' (Pen-y-Lan), Wropton, 'Wolston Mynd' (Trelystan) and Weston Madoc were later in the Corbet lordship of Upper Gorddwr. As part of Marcher lordships they are often 
poorly represented in later records. Many of them have a tenuous presence in Chirbury Hundred, but suit is often said to have been withdrawn from the hundred court: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. pp. 60a-61b; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Placita Quo Warranto}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 718-19.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab When the Marcher lo
rdships were formally dissolved and Wales was shired (in 1536) Montgomery itself was placed in Montgomeryshire, Wales. Most of its dependent estates were returned to Shropshire, but some followed it into Montgomeryshire, then, after 1974, into Powys.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab OSLAC <OF MONTGOMERY>. }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The Domesday forms of this name - }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Oslac}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Oslac}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{
\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ] - represent Old English }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Oslac}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 340, though he mentioned Old Norse }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Aslakr}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  as a possible etymon. The Phillimore printed edit
ion has Oslac, but the Alecto edition has both Oslac and Aslak. This is the only occurrence of this name in Domesday Shropshire.
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The name Oslac occurs on 22 holdings in Domesday Book, probably representing between 13 and 15 individuals. The distribution 
is curious, falling into four distinct groups, in Devon, Shropshire, the Midlands, and East Anglia and Essex. The Oslac who shared the waste holdings at Montgomery with two other thanes 'for hunting', was remote from all others bearing his name and had no
 apparent connections with any of them (JP).}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab AZUR. }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The Domesday forms of this }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  holder - }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Azor}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Azur}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Azer}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Atser}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ], }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Azorius}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Atsur}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Assorin}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ] - represent Old Danish/Old Swedish }{
\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Azur}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, pp. 170-71. In the Phillimore printed edition this name is generally rendered Azor, but Atsurr in Yorkshire and Lincolnshire. These have now been standardized as Azur. The Alecto edition has Azur}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 52 \'bd HIDES ARE ATTACHED TO IT. There may be a miscount here; compare 4,1,37 outliers note. The 52 \'bd
 hides attached to Montgomery castle become 'the above 50 hides' at the end of the entry. The actual total seems to be made up of 35 \'bd hides held by Siward, Oslac and Azur (4,1,35) plus 3 hides in lordship and 12 h
ides in 4,1,36 (which is not strictly a separate entry), making 50 \'bd hides in all.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab EDENHOPE. This was part of Mainstone township in Clun Ancient Parish (Shropshire), appearing as Upper Edenhope (SO2588) and Lower Edenhope (SO2788) on}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
modern Ordnance Survey maps; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 155.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ASTON. Upper, Middle and Lower Aston, in that part of Churchstoke Ancient Parish,}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab that was placed in Montgomeryshire in 1536. This land is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Asto' Kelemont }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 89b, associated with Castlewright}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and Mellington, and appears as }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Aston Kelmund }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}
{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 60a (Chirbury Hundred), where it}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is said to have been given by Robert }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Buler}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 lord of Montgomery, to his son William. The}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 latter sold these three manors to the Bishop of Hereford and they are subsequently}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 known as Teirtref Esgob ('Bishop's Three Towns') a part of Bishop's Castle, member of}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lydbury North (2,1); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 89b; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 155.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab "STANTUNE".}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 It has sometimes been identified with Hyssington (in that part of Churchstoke Ancient Parish, }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 t}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
hat was placed in Montgomeryshire in 1536) or with Mainstone (an Ancient Parish), but there is no firm evidence: Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 164; Thomas, 'The Gorther', pp. 197-98; }
{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 318. This group of places seems,}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 however, to be entered in a rough topographical order working northwards, so }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Stantune}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 like }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Goseford}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 should probably be looked for in the area now occupied by Churchstoke}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 parish.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab CASTLEWRIGHT. The Domesday form }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Cestelop }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is probably corrupt and the place is to be}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 identified with that }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Castelruht}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 half of which in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 89b (Chirbury Hundred) is held by}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Llewelyn 'Prince of Wales' of the honour of Montgomery, together with Aston and}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Mellington. It is the }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Chestroc }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of Bishop Swinfield's }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Register }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (year 1285). This}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
identification, which has been questioned, is accepted by Noble, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Offa's Dyke Re-viewed}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 71 (map 17);}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 see Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 156. Upper Castlewright and Lower Castlewright (Welsh,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Castell-wrych) were in Castlewright township in that}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 part of Clun Ancient Parish that was placed in Montgomeryshire in 1536.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab MELLINGTON. It lay in that part of Churchstoke Ancient Parish }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 t}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hat was placed in Montgomeryshire in 1536. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 89b, half of}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Mulito' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and half of Castlewright are associated with Aston and held by Llewelyn 'Prince of}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wales' from the honour of Montgomery: Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 156; and 4,1,35 Aston note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab "GOSEFORD".}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The place is unidentified, though said by Thomas, 'The Gorther', pp. 197-98, to be Rhyd-y-groes.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 See 4,1,35 "Stantune" note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HOPTON. Red Hopton and Pied Hopton, or Hopton Uchaf and Hopton Isaf, lay in that part of Churchstoke Ancient Parish }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 t}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
hat was placed in Montgomeryshire in 1536; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 156. This manor went to the}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Corbet Welshry of Upper Gorddwr. A second manor here is subsequently held by the}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 lords of Maelienydd-Ceri; see Morgan, 'Montgomeryshire Territorial Divisions', p. 23.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab "BENEHALE".}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 It has sometimes been identified with Binweston (in Trelystan parish; see Thomas, 'The Gorther', pp. 197-98) but on no good grounds; see }{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Davies, 'Lordships and Manors'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 111; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
164; and 4,4,20 Worthen note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab DUDSTON. It lay in Chirbury Ancient Parish. It passed to the Fitz Herberts (4,5 Robert note), being held in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 972, as }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Dudesdon' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 by William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Muleston' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from the barony of Herbert son of Peter; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 61a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 361; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, xi. p. 157.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab In the Alecto facsimile the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 D}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Dudestune}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  resembles a }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 B}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see 3c,7 Perkley note.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab PEN-Y-LAN. Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wadelestun }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 survived onto modern maps as 'Woodluston' (see Ordnance Survey six-inch}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
map 1st edition 30 SW), but has now been displaced by Pen-y-Lan. It lay in Forden Ancient Parish which was placed in Montgomeryshire in 1536 (see Richards, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Welsh Administrative and Territorial Units}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ), and is misplaced on the map in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday Gazetteer}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . It is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wedilistone}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
held by Peter Corbet in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Placita de Quo Warranto}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 718-19; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 159.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HOCKLETON. It lay in Chirbury Ancient Parish. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 60b, \'bd hide in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hokeltun }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 was held,}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 together with \'bd virgate in the manor of Chirbury, by William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Hokeltun}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 by service at}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Montgomery castle; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 965, 973; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 233, 240; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 180,}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
ii. no. 342; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 159.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The Domesday name-form is }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Elchitun }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 which could only have evolved to Hocleton by metathesis: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 154.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WALCOT. It lay in Chirbury Ancient Parish. In later times it is counted as a member of Chirbury; see 4,1,10 Chirbury note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab TRELYSTAN. Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Vlestanesmude. }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 It was once in Worthen Ancient Parish, Shropshire, now in Leighton with Trelystan parish 
in Montgomeryshire. It was plaed in Montgomeryshire in 1536 at the dissolution of the Marcher lordships. The Welsh name has superseded the English, although the 1st edition Ordnance Survey map (sheet 60 of 1836, reprint sheet 40 of 1970) gives Wolston Myn
d or Trelystan as alternatives. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 113a, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wolstandusmu'de }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 like}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ocleg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Ackley; see 4,1,36 Ackley note) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Kilkewyt }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Cilcewydd; see 4,1,36 Ackley note) is a member of}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Worthen (4,4,20) held by Thomas Corbet, but they have all been occupied by Llewelyn}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 'Prince of Wales'. The }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 383, says that they are members of Chirbury (4,1,10); see}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 also }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Placita de Quo Warranto}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 718-19; Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 151. These three manors form Kings Teirtref.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Other members of Chirbury Hundred that may have had some involvement with the above vills are \'bd hide in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Mucliwyke }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Mucklewick SO3397) in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 60b (see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 232; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 162b); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wilmitun' }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Wilmington SJ2901) in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 60b (see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 259, vi. nos. 320, 361); and }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Winesburi }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Winsbury SO2498) in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 61a (see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 383, 965, 973; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 233, 240; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, ii. no. 756, iii. no. 560, vi. no. 466). All these were held from the honour of Montgomery. Winsbury is coupled in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 61a,}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 756, iii. no. 560, with }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stanlowe }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(unidentified). Hyssington (SO3194) and Snead (SO3291), later given to Chirbury priory, were probably among these 50 \'bd hides; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 162b; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus
}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 iii. p. 21; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi pp. 164-65.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ABOVE 50 HIDES. See 4,1,35 hides note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,36\tab THESE LANDS were held from Earl Roger, mainly by Roger son of Corbet. After 1086 they were gradually and intermittently absorbed by the Welshries. When the Marcher lordships were formally dissolved and Wales was s
hired (in 1536) Montgomery itself was placed in Montgomeryshire, Wales. Most of its dependent estates were returned to Shropshire, but some followed it into Montgomeryshire, then, after 1974, into Powys.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THANES. The main scribe of Great Domesday interlined }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 i }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 above and between }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 a }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 n }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 tani}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 though with no omission sign. The form }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 tani }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 occurs in HEF 10,28 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 tannus }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is the preferred spelling for }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 tainus }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
of one particular scribe in Exon.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WESTON [MADOC]. It lay in that part of Churchstoke Ancient Parish }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 t}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hat was placed in Montgomeryshire in 1536. It is later associated with Brompton (4,27,24): }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 812; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 150.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The Grid Reference (SO2394) is to Great Weston Farm.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 'STARCOTE'. The name of this member of Montgomery Castlery is poorly represented in later records, but it did not disappear in the thirteenth century (Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 151). It is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Starcottes Field }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in 1556 (National Library of Wales,
 Powis Castle Deed no. 16274) and it survived into the nineteenth century as a field name in the Flos Lands to the north of Montgomery, in Montgomery Ancient Parish. The name is given to fields 425 and 441 on the Tithe Apportionment, which are the same as
 fields 750 and 753 on the Ordnance Survey 25-inch maps. The position of this vill was just to the north-east of Siglen at SO216985; see Pryce, 'Borough of Montgomery', pp. 53-78; }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Davies, 'Lordships and Manors', }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 pp. 90, 130; Morgan, 'Trewern in Gorddwr', pp. 123, 125; Barker and Lawson, 'Pre-Roman Field Systems at Hen Domen', p. 67; Barker and Higham, 'Hen Domen', vol. i. p. 8.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 'HORSEWALL'. Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Horseforde. }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 This vill was left unidentified by Eyton (xi. p. 151) and tentatively identified with Horsebridge near Minsterley by }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 318. Horsebridge is a long way, however, from all the other places that can be identified in the castle(ry) of Montgomery. Thomas, 'The Gorther', pp. 197-98, suggested Rhydwyman (see Davies, 'Lordships and Manors',
 p. 120) and this is adopted by Morgan, 'Trewern in Gorddwr', p. 125 (map). In the Montgomery parish Tithe Apportionment seven fields are called 'Horsewall' very close to Rhydwyman farm (SO209984) and these must represent the Domesday place. The name is f
o
und in two Powis Castle deeds (nos. 12930, 16264) now in the National Library of Wales; see Barker and Lawson, 'Pre-Roman Field Systems at Hen Domen', p. 67; Barker and Higham, 'Hen Domen', vol. i. pp. 8-9. As a member of Montgomery Ancient Parish 'Horsew
all' will have been placed in Mongomeryshire in 1536.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THE GAER. Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Torneberie. }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
It lay in Forden Ancient Parish which has been in Montgomeryshire since the formal dissolution of the Marcher lordships in 1536. The Welsh name has replaced 'Thornbury' wh
ich survived to appear on modern Ordnance Survey maps as an area name. It appears in the 1292 }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Placita de Quo Warranto}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 Inquest (pp. 718-19) as being withdrawn from Chirbury Hundred by Peter Corbet; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 151.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HEM ... EDDERTON ... FORDEN ... WROPTON. All these places were members of Forden Ancient Parish which has been in Montgomeryshire since the formal dissolution of the Marcher lordships in 1536. All appear, as }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hemme}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Edderton}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Fortone }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wrobeton}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in the 1292 }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Placita de Quo Warranto}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 Inquest (pp. 718-19) as having been withdrawn by Peter Corbet from Chirbury Hundred; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. no. 318, ix. no. 50; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. pp. 101-102, 151-53.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Hem is represented by Great Hem (SJ2300), which includes Upper Hem and Lower Hem, and by Hem Farm (SJ2200), formerly Little Hem.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ACKLEY. Now also in Forden Ancient Parish which has been in Montgomeryshire since the formal dissolution of the Marcher lordships in 1536. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Acle }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 appears in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 89b, as held by Llewelyn 'Prince of Wales' from the honour of Montgomery and in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 112b, as occupied by the same man when it should be held by Thomas Corbet; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 383; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 153.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 383, and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 89b, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Acle }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 or }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Acled }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 are coupled with }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Kilkewid }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Kilkewyt }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Cilcewydd SJ2203), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lettegu }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(Leighton 4,4,22), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Newarch }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (unidentfied), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wlstanesmunede }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Wolstan Mynd, otherwise Trelystan: 4,1,35) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Midulto' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(Middleton: 4,27,22). Some of these may represent parts of the above vills.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ROGER ^[SON OF]^ CORBET. See 4,1,15 son of note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ALWARD [* SON OF ALMUND *]. See 3f,2 Alward note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THEY WERE WASTE. The main scribe of Great Domesday originally wrote }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wasta}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . This is apparently neuter plural, agreeing with an understood }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 maneria}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  (compare 4,3,36 }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Haec ii maneria wasta fuerunt}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ). The scribe then altered it to }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wasti}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 masculine plural, though there is nothing for this to agree with. He may, however, have ttiought that the (understood) }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 maneria }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 was masculine as he did in 4,1,37 (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 M' quos ...}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 alios xi M'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ).}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 He ought in fact to have corrected }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wasta }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 to }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wastae }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 to agree with the feminine }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 has terras }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 three lines previously.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,1,37\tab THIS ENTRY is essentially a summary of Earl Roger's lordship holdings and his revenue.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THE WHOLE COUNTY. It is possible that }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 comitatus }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 here means 'earldom' because Earl Roger did not in fact hold the whole county (there were eigh
t other tenants-in-chief besides him); also }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 scira }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is used for 'county', 'shire' later in the Latin sentence. Roger enjoyed all the rights of an earl in Shropshire; see Davis, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 England under the Normans}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 517-20. However, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 placita comitatus }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in the next paragraph would seem to be the pleas of the whole county.}{
\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 12 MANORS ... WITH 57 OUTLIERS. The 12 manors are those that are first listed in Earl Roger's schedule (4,1,1-12). They had belonged to King Edward and many of them were the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 capita }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of hundreds. The total of outliers appears to be 53 not 57; mistakes in totalling are very common in Great Domesday (compare 4,1,35 hides note)..}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 11 OTHER MANORS. Many more than 11 manors are given in this chapter. If Montgomery and Overs (4,1,15;34), both doubtful 'manors'
, are included, the number would be 21 (4,1,14-34) so there may be a figure error. There are further manors held by Earl Roger in 4,28. See }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. pp. 288, 292, 305.}{
\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab PLEAS OF THE COUNTY. That is, of pleas made in the county court. Revenue also came from pleas heard in the hundred courts: 4,1,1 pennies note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab See also Fleming, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday Book and the Law}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 225 no. 1325.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \'a3300 AND 115s IN REVENUE. According to W. Morris, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Medieval English Sheriff}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 44 note 32, this money, received from the 'far
ming' of Shrewsbury, the (lordship) manors and the pleas of the county and hundreds, went to Earl Roger and not to the king; compare CHS C24 where Mundret 'farmed' Chester and 'all the earl's pleas in the county and the hundreds, except Englefield'.}{
\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,2\tab [HOLDING OF EARL HUGH [* OF CHESTER *] UNDER EARL ROGER].}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Hugh of Avranches, also known as Hugh the fat, was second Earl of Chester from }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 c}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
. 1071-1101 having succeeded William's first earl, Gherbod (left his earldom }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 c}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . 1071; died 1085). Hugh came from Avranches in the French d\'e9
partement of Manche. He was the son of Richard Goz, vicomte of Avranches, and a woman who was possibly a half-sister of King William. His lands became the honour or barony of Chester. Hugh's only
 son Richard perished with the White Ship in 1120 and the lands passed to a first cousin, Ranulph I Le Meschin, son of Ranulph the vicomte of Bayeux who was married to Hugh's sister Margaret. See Sanders, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 English Baronies}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 32-33; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 258.
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Like Earl Roger, Hugh was a 'palatine' earl and, like Roger in Shropshire, he held almost all the land in Cheshire (see the paragraph at the end of CHS C25 which takes the place of the Landholders' List in other counties). At this time Hu
gh and his assistant Robert of Rhuddlan were effectively controlling Gwynedd while Earl Roger was making inroads into Powys: 4,1,15 district note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,2,1\tab IAL. Domesday has }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 terram de Gal. }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 This was a Welsh commote (anglicized as Yale) and was the}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
furthest nor
th-western point that Earl Roger's advance into North Wales had reached in 1086. Its mention implies the annexation also of Cynllaith and Edeyrnion (4,3,42) and also probably of Nanheudwy (4,1,13 district note). Although Ial seems to have been regarded as
 
part of Powys rather than of Gwynedd and thus fell into Earl Roger's sphere of influence, it lay adjacent to the Welsh District of Maelor Cymraeg, which was called 'Duddeston' Hundred in 1086 and was part of Cheshire. The possible conflict of interest bet
ween Earls Hugh and Roger seems to have been solved by making Earl Hugh the undertenant of Earl Roger; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 50; Lloyd, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
History of Wales}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ii. p. 389; Lloyd, 'Wales and the Coming of the Normans'; Edwards, 'Normans and the Welsh March', p. 159; and \{Introduction: History\}.}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Cynllaith and Edeyrnion seem in 4,3,42 to be counted as attached to "Merset" Hundred; Ial should perhaps also be under the same heading.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THIS LAND EXTENDS ... WIDTH. An unusual sentence which takes 
the place of the hidage statement, though one would expect the land to be measured in carucates, like other Welsh land; see C13 hides note on the hide and compare 4,1,15 ploughs note. In Domesday Lincolnshire, however, similar measurements are given in so
m
e 17 entries, though only in LIN 7,10 and LIN 14,83 is it stated that these are of the whole manor. Such measurements are also common in Little Domesday Book, but in these and the Lincolnshire cases the hidation or carucation of the holdings is also given
.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THE SAME [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the rest of the line (room for about 12 letters) after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 similit' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
which has no dot after it. It would appear that he misplaced this part of the land's 'value', possibly led astray by the unusual 
description of the land's size (see 4,2,1 land note), which is similar to that used for the resources which normally precede the value. Also, if he dealt with any Welsh areas previously he would have been expecting only the briefest details followed by a 
v
alue, as in 4,1,13 and 4,3,42. The value of the holding in 1086 would normally go here after the 'value' in 1066 and when acquired by Hugh, hence possibly the space. If so, he changed his mind and put the 1086 value in its correct place after the resource
s.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,3\tab [HOLDING OF REGINALD THE SHERIFF UNDER EARL ROGER]. }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 In Domesday h}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 e is called Reginald }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Balgiole}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 (in the Landholders' List in Staffordshire: folio 246a), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bailgiole}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  in STS 14 chapter head}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Balgiole}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  in STS 14,1. He came from Bailleul (sometimes known as Bailleul-en-Gouffern) in the French d\'e9
partement of Orne (arrondissement Argentan, canton Trun), near Exmes which was }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 caput }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of Earl Roger's vicomt\'e9 in Normandy ((}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 296, but see Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 70). Although his nam
e has sometimes been anglicized as Balliol, like the thirteenth-century founder of Balliol College, Oxford, the latter came from a different Bailleul (in Picardy) and there is no connection between them. Reginald\rquote s wife Amieria was the niece (}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 nepta}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ) of Roger of Montgomery, so he was very much the earl\rquote 
s official. She had previously been married to Warin the bald, Reginald's predecessor as sheriff of Shropshire. The transfer of power took place }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 1085 and involved a large amount of land, which may have been held in trust for Warin\rquote 
s son Hugh who held both the land and perhaps the sheriffdom briefly after 1102. Reginald returned to Normandy in 1102 when Earl Roger's son, Robert of Bell\'eame, forfeited the fief. See Mason, 'Officers and Clerks', pp. 245-47; Sanders, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 English Baronies}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 70; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vii. pp. 203-11; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 348.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab As Reginald's lands appear to have come to him with the shrievalty, they subsequently came into the hands of the sheriff Alan Fitz Flaad, then descended to the Fitz Alans and to their barony of Oswestry. See SHR \{
Introduction: Administration of the Shire\}.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The lands of some of Reginald's subtenants have a regular descent: thus those of Azo [* Bigot *] (4,3,7;14-15;47;64) go to Lestrange
, those of Alchere (4,3,4;60;65) to Fitz Ayer (or Fitz Aer), those of Albert (4,3,5;54-56;65) to de Rossall, and those of Ralph (4,3,67-68) to de Constantine.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab The hundredal order of this chapter is as follows (the bracketed numbers are explained in SHR 4 arrangement note):
\par \tab \tab 4,3,1-5 Hodnet Hundred}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 4,3,6-13 Patton Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,3,14-20 Condover Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,3,21-31 Wrockwardine Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,3,32-43 "Merset" Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,3,44-45 "Culvestan" Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,3,46-47 Leintwardine Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,3,48 'Overs' Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,3,49-59 Baschurch Hundred}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 4,3,60-68 "Alnodestreu" Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,3,69-70 'Conditre' Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,3,71 Baschurch Hundred
\par \tab The final entry is out of sequence as the hundred has already been entered, but it is a later addition.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,3,1\tab 
MARCHAMLEY. This was a chapelry and township of Hodnet Ancient Parish. It was in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. Marchamley, as anticipated, descended to Fitz Alan. The Domesday holding, on later evidence, consisted of 4 hides at Marc
hamley itself and 1 \'bd hides}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 at Hopton and Espley. Thus in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 58b, James }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
de Aldith' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Audley) holds 4 hides in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Marchimleg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from John Fitz Alan with service at Oswestry (Castle); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 962, 971; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 227, 236; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. nos. 97, 196, 285, v. no. 62, vi. no. 56. In the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Marchimleg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is coupled with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Weston }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Weston-under-Redcastle 4,10,3) where James }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Aldith' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 was also mesne tenant. The remaining 1 \'bd hides were at }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hopton }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Espele }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Hopton SJ6027, another part of which was later held by Haughmond Abbey (4,8,3), and Espley SJ6026) which Robert }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Espele }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds from John Fitz Alan in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 58a: see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 116; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 962, 970; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 221, 236. A part of Marchamley was }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Loscusford }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Lostford SJ6231) in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, v. no. 62; its tithes were given to Shrewsbury Abbey (the Shrewsbury Cartulary: Rees, pp. 34, 39). On the manor as a whole, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 272.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab AS 2 MANORS. This was written in the right margin of the manuscript by the main scribe of Great Domesday, slightly aslant and probably added; compare 4,14,25 Gamal note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,3,2\tab [HIGH] HATTON. This 
lay in the Ancient Parish of Stanton-upon-Hine-Heath. It was in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. Its overlord was Fitz Alan and in the mid-thirteenth century it was held by the Corbet family of Tasley. In }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 55b, Roger }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Corbet }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 1 hide (half the Domesday extent) in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hatton }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from John Fitz Alan. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hatton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is coupled with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hedleg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Hadley: 4,3,27), both held by Thomas }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Corbet de Tasseleg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 971. It is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Heyehacton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 221,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  He Hatton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 119, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hatton upon Hyneheth }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 582 (of Thomas Corbet of Tasley) where it pays dues to }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rounde Acton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Acton Round: 4,3,6). See }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 227; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 287.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab RICHARD [* THE BUTLER *]. He is probably Reginald's butler: 4,1,5 Richard note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WHICH PAY TAX. Scribe B added }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 gld'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  here in a space originally left after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hid\'ea }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
by the main scribe of Great Domesday; see 1,5 land note. For scribe B's other contributions of a similar nature, see 4,1,1 pay note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ALRIC. }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The Domesday forms of the name-form Alric - }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Alric}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, Elric}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , Aelric}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , Alrich, Alrist}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  (a scribal error) - could represent Old English }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \'c6thelric}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  or Old English }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \'c6lfric}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{
\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 150-51, under }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Al-ric}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , and see also p. 142, under }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Al-}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . JRM followed von Feilitzen in keeping to the base form, as does the Alecto edit
ion. However, occasionally some of the people here rendered Alric appear in certain Phillimore printed translations as Aelfric or Aethelric, but their name-forms do not include the }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 -u-}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  or }{
\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 -f-}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  required by JRM for inclusion under Aelfric, or the }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 -d-}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  or }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 -g-}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  r
equired by him for inclusion under Aethelric.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,3,3\tab STANTON[-UPON-HINE-HEATH]. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred, and descended in the Fitz Alan barony: in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 55a, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Stanton'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , \'bd hide, is held by Stephen son of Stephen from the fee of John Fitz Alan. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 p. 57b, it is held from John Fitz Alan, lord of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 P'ston juxta le Goord }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(Preston SJ5211, formerly Preston Boats or Preston on Severn, part of Upton Magna: 4,3,24). In the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 pp. 962, 971, Stephen 
}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Stanton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Stanton'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Rodene }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(Roden SJ5716, part of Rodington: 4,3,31) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Preston' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from the barony of John Fitz Alan; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 227, 236; Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix p. 292.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab RICHARD [* THE BUTLER *]. He is probably Reginald's butler: 4,1,5 Richard note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab SAEWARD [* SIWARD THE FAT *]. Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Sauuard}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 represents Old English }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 S\'e6weard }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (von Feiltzen, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 354), but it may be a scribal error here for }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Seuuard}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ] as a }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Seuuard}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [
}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ('Siward') was Reginald's predecessor in 13 manors. Compare 5,2 Saeward note and 7,1 Saeward note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab On the possibility that he was the same person as Siward [the fat], on whom see 4,27,32 Siward note, see 4,1,34 Siward note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HE WAS FREE WITH THIS LAND. That is, he was free to go where he wished with his land and could commend himself to another lord; see 3b,4 go note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,3,4\tab 
[GREAT] WYTHEFORD. This lay in Shawbury Ancient Parish, was in Hodnet Hundred in 1086 and later in 'Bradford' Hundred. The overlordship went to Fitz Alan and in the thirteenth century the tenants were de Rossall and Fitz Ayer, the lat
ter at least holding under the Lestrange family of Knockin (4,3,43 Osbaston note) or Ruyton (4,18,2). The share belonging to Fitz Ayer is represented in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 57a, by 2 hides in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wythyford }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 held by John Fitz Ayer of the fee of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Knokyn}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 221, by }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Magna Wythiford}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Mokelinton }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Muckleton SJ5921) and half of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Erehaldinham }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Edgebolton SJ5721; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iii. no. 635) held by John Fitz Ayer from John }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Extraneus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of his manor of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ruton }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Ryton) according to the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 115. The de Rossalls also held in Edgbolton and gave their share to Haughmond Abbey: the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, nos. 303-309); }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii. p. 192. In due course part of Muckleton was given to the same abbey by Fitz Ayer; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ix. p. 309. The Fitz Ayer family also held the other part of Great Wytheford (4,14,2) under the barony of Wem.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ALCHERE <OF LE PIN>. It is likely that all occurrences of this name in Shropshir
e (4,3,4;60;65;71. 4,27,35) refer to the same individual and that he was also Earl Roger's tenant at Mundham in Sussex (SUS 11,41). He was apparently the ancestor of the Fitz Ayer family. See Williams, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
The English and the Norman Conquest}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 91; Lewis, 'Introduction', }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Shropshire Domesday}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 19; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 134.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab VILGRIP <OF WYTHEFORD>. The Domesday forms of this name - }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wilegrip}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Willegrip}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wilgripus }{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 - represent Old Danish }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Vilgrip}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 405. The printed Phillimore edition has Wilgrip; this has now been changed to Vilgrip. The Alecto edition has Vilgrip.
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab It is probable that the Vilgrip who had held Kynnersley (4,23,1) was the same individual: these are }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 the only occurrences of this rare name in Domesday Shropshire. See STS 11,32 Vithgrip note.}{
\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WHICH PAY TAX. This was added by scribe B in a space left by the main scribe of Great Domesday; see 4,1,1 pay note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab NOW 40s. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a space suitable for about five letters after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 wast'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  before writing 'now 40s'.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,3,5\tab IN THE SAME VILLAGE. See 4,3,4 Wytheford note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WHICH PAYS TAX. Scribe B had to interline }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geld'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  because the main scribe of Great Domesday had failed to leave a space after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hid'}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see 1,5 hide note and, on other contributions by scribe B on taxability, 4,1,1 pay note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ALBERT [* GRELLEY *]. The byname is found in CHS R4,2: Albert }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 greslet}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; the same man is also named Albert }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 crematus}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  in SUF 8,15. Tenant of Roger of Poitou in 'Between
 the Ribble and the Mersey' (attached to Cheshire in 1086, later in Lancashire), Lincolnshire, Norfolk and Suffolk, his lands subsequently forming the barony of Manchester (Sanders, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 English Baronies}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 130-31). He also held from the Earl of Shrewsbury in Shropshire. See }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Lancashire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. pp. 326-44; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 132-33 (JP).
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab That an Albert 'Greslet' who was the forebear of the Grelley family of Lancashire held from Roger of Poitou is well established. However, although Roger of Poi
tou was Earl Roger's son, there is no other reason to connect the Albert who holds under Reginald of Bailleul under Earl Roger (4,3,5;54-56;65) with Albert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 greslet}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 /}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 crematus}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; indeed, the descent of Great Wytheford (4,3,5 Wytheford note) and the other estates contains no trace of a Grelley interest. As for many of Keats-Rohan's cross-references, the evidence to support an individual reference is lacking.

\par \tab \tab The Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 crematus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  and the Old French }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 greslet}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  are not translations of each other. The first means 'burnt
', the second 'struck by hail'. They must both, therefore, represent different ways of describing a skin-defect. The Old French is likely to refer to a skin that would nowadays be described as pock-marked, but without any implied reference to the pox.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WOULD BE POSSIBLE. Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 posset fieri }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in place of the more common }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 posset esse}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 as also in WOR 1,5 and 2,85 (though with the indicative mood in the former). On this formula, see 1,4 ploughs note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,3,6\tab ACTON [ROUND]. This was a chapelry of the Ancient Parish of Much Wenlock, but is now its own Civil Parish. It lay in Patton Hundred in 1086, later in Munslow Hundred.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Land at }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Actune }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 was left to Burton Abbey }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . 1003 in the will of Wulfric Spot: }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Early Charters of the West Midlands}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 149 no. 144 (= Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , no. 1536). The county in which }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Actune}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 lay, and its exact identity, are uncertain, although the partially geographical arrangement of the will suggests that the place lay in Shropshire. In none of the three Actons in Shropshire that were
 Domesday manors is there any trace of any connection with Burton Abbey: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Charters of Burton Abbey}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. xxxi and no. 29.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab It remained a demesne holding of the Fitz Alans for many years. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 71a, John Fitz Alan holds from the king }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Acton'}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Mughales }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Monkhall SO6194; see 3c,2 Wenlock note) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Muckel }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Muckley SO6495). It is }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Acton Round }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 225, and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Acton la Runde }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, ii. no. 536; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 229; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 1283; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, iv. no. 90; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 121. The church of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Acton Rotund'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  was}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
held by the prior of Wenlock in 1291 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 164b, 167b); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
iii. p. 216.On the affix, see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 6.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,3,7\tab ABDON. This was an Ancient Parish. The Domesday place lay in Patton Hundred in 1086, then in Munslow Hundred. The overlordship passed to Fitz Alan, Reginald's successor in the shrieval
 estates, the mesne tenancy, as is usual with lands held by Azo in 1086, to }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lestrange}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 71a, Geoffrey }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Ledewich }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 2 hides in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Abbeton'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  from John }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Extraneus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 223. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 229, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Abeton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is coupled with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rothale }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Ruthall: 4,23,13) and }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Thonglond }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Thonglands, part of Tugford: 4,3,8); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 587; Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 127; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 122.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Azo Bigot had granted 1 virgate of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Abbetona }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 to Shrewsbury Abbey between 1121 and 1136 together with \'bd
 hide in Longnor (4,3,15): the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. xx, 43, 64, 258, 262, 286); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 167b.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab AZO [* BIGOT *]. }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The Domesday forms of this 1086 tenant - }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Azo}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Asso}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  - represent Old German }
{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Azo}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Azzo}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Atso}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Adso}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , Old French}{
\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Ace}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Asse}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : Forssner, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Continental-Germanic Personal Names in England}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, pp. 39-40. The printed Phillimore edition has the forms Azo and Azor; these have now been standardized as Azo. The Alecto edition has Azo.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab For the identification of Azo as Azo Bigot, see 4,3,7 Abdon note, 4,3,15 Longnor note and 4,3,64 Glazeley note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,3,8\tab TUGFORD. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Patton Hundred in 1086 and was later in Munslow Hundred. Domesday
 records that it was given to Shrewsbury Abbey by Reginald for the soul of Warin, his predecessor as sheriff. The Shrewsbury Cartulary, however, attributes the gift to Warin himself. The size of the holding is 2 \'bd
 hides according to Domesday (with deduction of Rainer's 1 hide) which is the extent given in Henry II's confirmation (the Shrewsbury Cartulary: Rees, p. 41); those of Stephen and Henry I (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ibidem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, pp. 33, 256) mention only 2 hides; see the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. xiv, xviii, xx, 4, 6, 30, 31, 37 etc.). Land at }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Fertecota }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(unidentified) was included: 4,1,5 St Peter note. The abbey continued to hold }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Tuggefford }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 or }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taggeford }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 until the Dissolution; see }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 71b (where the extent is wrongly given as 5 hides); }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 163a, 167b; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 225, 228; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv p. 79; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 182.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab CHURCH OF }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ST PETER [* OF SHREWSBURY *]. That is, Earl Roger's abbey (SHR 3b). When he came to rubricate Shropshire, the main scribe of Great Domesday was misled by the capitals he had used for }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 S' PETRI}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  and probably also its position in the entry and lined them through in red instead of the place-name }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 DODEFORT}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 which was on the line below. On his failure to rubricate three hundred heads
 and six other place-names in Shropshire that were not later additions, see 4,3,52 Ness note, 4,3,53 Myddle note, 4,4,20 Wittery note, 4,21,11 Bosle note, 5,7 Ackhill note, 6,5 Lowe note and 6,33 entry note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HIS PREDECESSOR, WARIN [* THE SHERIFF *]. See a
lso in 4,3,71. Warin the bald was Roger of Montgomery's first sheriff and, like his successor Reginald, was related to him by marriage (see 4,3 Reginald note). Orderic Vitalis, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ecclesiastical History }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Chibnall, ii. p. 220) describes him as 'small in body, but great in spirit' and Earl Roger gave him the sheriffdom of Shrewsbury unless the Latin }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 praesidatum }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
means custody of Shrewsbury, i.e. the castle, though this probably amounted to the same thing: Round, 'Early Sherriffs of Norfolk', p. 496. Strictly speaking }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 praesidatum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 means 'governorship, office' in Medieval Latin; it is from }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 praeses}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  ('governor', 'official'), not }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 praesidium}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  ('guard'). In his }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ecclesiastical History }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Chibnall}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii. p. 21 and elsewhere) Orderic calls him 'sheriff of Shrewsbury'; his job, he
 says, was to crush the Welsh and any other enemies and pacify the whole province entrusted to him. Many of Warin's lands lay on the Welsh border and he seems to have led an expedition into Wales: Jones, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Gruffydd ap Cynan}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 123; see also \{Introduction: History\}. The mention of Warin in connection with St Peter's is interesting because Orderic (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ecclesiastical History}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
: Chibnall, ii. pp. 420-21) records that Warin the sheriff was among the leading men summoned by Earl Roger to hear his plans for the building
 of Shrewsbury Abbey. Warin died some time between 1085 and the compilation of Great Domesday: Galbraith, 'An Episcopal Land-Grant of 1085', p. 360. See Mason, 'Officers and Clerks',}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 pp. 245-47.}
{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab See also Fleming, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday Book and the Law}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 225 no. 1326.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ALWIN. }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The Domesday forms of the name-form Alwin - }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Aluuin}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ), }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Aluuine}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Aeluuin}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ),}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Aeluin}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ),}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Aluin}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , Eluuine, Eluuin}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , Eluinus}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  - could represent Old English \'c6}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 lfwine, }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Old English }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \'c6thelwine}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , Old English }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ealdwine}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  or even Old English }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ealhwine}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 158-60, under }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Al-wine}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , and see also p. 142, under }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Al-}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
. JRM followed von Feilitzen in keeping to the base form, but preferred the second element -win to Old English }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 -wine}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , as it reflected th
e form of the majority of instances in Domesday. The Alecto edition has Alwine for those appearing under }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Al-wine}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . Some of those called Alwin in the present edition appear under Old English }{
\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \'c6lfwine}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  in von Feilitzen, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 181, but the Domesday forms (}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Aluuinus, Aluinus, Eluuius}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ) do not contain the }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 -f- }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 or}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  \endash v-}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 that JRM thought was necessary for inclusion under that name. Some also appear under Old English }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \'c6thelwine}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  in von Feilitzen, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 190-91, but the Domesday forms (}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Aeluuinus, Aluuine, Aluuin(us), Aluinus}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ) do not contain the }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 -d-}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  or }{
\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 -g-}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  which JRM thought was the requisite for inclusion under that name. In some of the Phillimore printed translations the forms Alwine and A(i)lwin appear, but these have now been standardized as Alwin.}{
\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab RAINER ... 1 HIDE. This did not all pass immediately or permanently to Shrewsbury Abbey, but some or all was held for life by Rainer and was the subject of a dispute when his son William refused 
to give it up: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, p. 2). The land concerned was at }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Fertecote}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 which was presumably part of Thonglands (SO5489), the name of the hide from which Rainer and his descendants were named. It is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Thonclond }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Thonglands SO5489) in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 963, 971, where Richard }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Thonclond }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds from the barony of John Fitz Alan; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 223, 229, 244; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 160; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 356; and 4,3,7 Abdon note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,3,9\tab STANWAY. This lay in Rushbury Anc
ient Parish. It lay in Patton Hundred in 1086, later in Munslow Hundred. The overlordship came to Fitz Alan and the tenancy passed from Odo to Roger Fitz Odo, then to Hugh of Rushbury (named from Rushbury: 4,8,5). He gave the manor to Hugh of Audley, a gi
ft confirmed in 1227 (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calender of Close Rolls}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 36), but Hugh then exchanged it with Madoc of Sutton for a share in Weston-under-Redcastle (4,10,3). Thus in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 70b, Madoc }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Sutton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 1 \'bd hides in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Stanwey. }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The manor also prob
ably included Stoneacton (SO5093) for in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 965 (fees of Tournay) Madoc }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Sotton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Stanewey }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Staniacton}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Stoneacton may only have been}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \'bd hide which the Templars of Lydley (4,27,12) hold in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 72b; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 245; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 89; and 4,3,44 Cardington note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradestana }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Broadstone SO5489), 1 virgate, confirmed on Shrewsbury Abbey by Roger son of Odo }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Rusberia }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and William Fitz Alan between 1155 and 1160 and said 
to have been given by Roger's ancestors, was also probably part of Stanway: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. xx, 15, 16, 43, 250, 258, 262); }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 161.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 61, suggests that Stoneacton may have originated as part of C
ardington (4,3,44) or Gretton (4,3,10) and had been added by Warin to Stanway shortly before 1086 to compensate for the loss of Broadstone.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ODO [* OF BERNIERES *]. The Odo who holds from Reginald of Bailleul and from Roger of Lacy (4,3,9-10;17-19. 4,8,5) may be Odo of Berni\'e8res who also holds directly from Earl Roger (4,18): Lewis, 'Introduction', }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Shropshire Domesday}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 19; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 308. He is probably also known as Odo }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 miles}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : 4,18 Odo note. However, an Odo }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 clericus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  was a witness to the grant by the Bishop of Hereford to Roger of Lacy o}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
f land in Onibury (2,2) and in Holme Lacy (HEF 2,12): Galbraith, 'An Episcopal Land-Grant of 1085', p. 360. See 2,2 Lacy note. The identity of the Odo here has thus not been fully resolved.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank three-quarters of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WHEN HE ACQUIRED IT. Great Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 q'do recep' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 abbreviates }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 quando recepit}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
the subject being either Earl Roger or Reginald the sheriff. Usually the date is that at which the manor was acquired by the tenant-in-chief from King William (see, for example, DEV 2,14 formerly note), but certainly in the case of these subsections of c
hapter 4 it may be the date of acquisition of the land by the subtenant from Earl Roger: see 4,2,1 }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 q}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 uan}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ]}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 do Hugo recep}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 it}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 )}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 referring to Roger's subtenant Earl Hugh. See DEV 16,88 formerly note and DOR 55,29 value note for other cases where the past value
 of a manor is when it was acquired by the subtenant, rather than the tenant-in-chief. This clause is a more exact description of the word }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 post }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
in previous value statements in Shropshire; see 1,7 later note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab In the manuscript the dot after }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 recep' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is very
 pale and so is not reproduced in the Ordnance Survey facsimile; it is just visible in the Alecto facsimile. See 3f,7 plough note for other faulty reproductions in the Ordnance Survey facsimile of Shropshire.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,3,10\tab GRETTON. This lay in Cardington Ancient 
Parish. It was in Patton Hundred in 1086, later in Munslow Hundred. The two subtenancies here in Domesday were perpetuated. Part of Odo's share seems to have followed the same descent as Kenley (4,3,19) going to Petronella Fitz Odo on her marriage to Warn
er }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Wililey}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 while the other portion seems to have gone to Richard }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Belmeis }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 under }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 La Zouche}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 70b, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Burthe}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 widow of Nicholas }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Wyleleg'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
holds 1 hide in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Gretiton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from John Fitz Alan, as guardian of Ralph her son while Robert }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Beumeys }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 1 hide from Alan }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de la Souche}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 223; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 105; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 63.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ODO [* OF BERNIERES *]. See 4,3,9 Odo note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab OTTAR. Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Otro }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 represents Old Danish }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ottar}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 342. His name was incorrectly rendered Othere in the Phillimore printed translation.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank three-quarters of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,3,11\tab EASTHOPE. This was an Ancient Parish. The vill lay in Patton Hundred in 1086, later in Munslow Hundred. It was am
ong the earliest possessions of Wenlock church, but was subsequently surrendered for Stanton Long (4,8,6): SHR 3c St Milburga note. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 70b, John }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Esthop' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 2 hides in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Esthop' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from John Fitz Alan; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, pp. 963, 971; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. no. 363; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 244; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 117; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 129.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ERNWY <OF EASTHOPE>. Although the parchment of the manuscript is split between the last two lines of this column, just below }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ernu}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and a clear reinforcement piece recently stuck on which partly covers the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 nu}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
there is no sign that the name was ever anything other than }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ernu}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : one would expect }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ernui }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 or }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ernu'}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . It is}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 probably a scribal error. On the name Ernwy, see 4,4,12 Ernwy note.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The name Ernwy or Ernwin occurs eight times in central Shropshire and nowhere else within 50 miles; it probably represents two or three individuals. The pre-Conques
t holder of the modest, shared property at Easthope might have been connected to those of Pontesbury or Easthope; but there are no discernible links to confirm this, and the Ernwys outside the county were too distant to be plausible related (JP).}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank half a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,3,12\tab LUTWYCHE. This lay in Rushbury Ancient Parish, being represented by Lutwyche Hal
l which is Wenlock Edge School. The place lay in Patton Hundred in 1086, later in Munslow Hundred. The overlordship went to Fitz Alan, the mesne tenants were lords of Brockton (4,3,13; both places have a 1086 tenant called Richard) and Lutwyche was held u
nder them by a family named from the place. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 71a, William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Lotwich }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
holds a third part of 2 hides from Thomas }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Brocton'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 223; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 113; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 64.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab RICHARD [* THE BUTLER *]. He is probably Reginald's butler; see 4,1,5 Richard note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,3,13\tab BROCKTON. This was divided between Shipton, a chapelry of Much Wenlock Ancient Parish which itself became an Ancient Parish, and the Ancient Parish of Stanton Long. 
It was in Patton Hundred, later in Munslow Hundred. Descent was to the de Brockton family under Fitz Alan. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 71a, Thomas }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Brocton' }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 1 \u8531\'3f hides from John Fitz Alan; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 963, 971; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 223, 
229, 244; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 109. Corve, which was later a possession of Wenlock Priory (3c,6 Shipton note), was originally part of this manor: Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 111; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 374.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab RICHARD [* THE BUTLER *]. He is probably Reginald's butler; see 4,1,5 Richard note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ALGEARD. }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The Domesday forms of this name-form - }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Eliard}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Eliert}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 - could represent either Old English }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \'c6thelgeard }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 or Old English }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \'c6lfgeard}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 146, under }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Al-geard}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , and also p. 142, under }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Al-}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
. JRM followed von Feilitzen in keeping to the base form. The Phillimore printed edition has both Algeard (here) and Alfyard (BRK 7,24, the only other occurrence of this name); these have now been standardized as Algeard. The Alecto edition has Algeard.}{
\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 2 HIDES. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ibi .ii. hidae }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 with a curved pen-mark between and below the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ibi }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ii}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . The scribe probably wrote }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .i.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hida }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 first and corrected it to }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .ii. hidae }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (hence the interlined }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 e }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 for }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 du}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 a}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 )e }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and the diphthong squiggle on the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 a }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hida)}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 but the second }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 i }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ibi }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
is in darker ink and may have been originally omitted and then added and because of its closeness to the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ii}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  the scribe emphasized the number of hides by the interlined }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 e}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,3,14\tab BERRINGTON. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Condover Hundred in 1086 and later. The overlordship passed from Reginald to Fitz Alan and the tenancy from Azo to Lestrange. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 62b, Richard }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Dryton}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 William Fitz Alan, John son of Philip and Philip}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Hungefort }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hold 2 hides in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Biriton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of the fee of John Extraneus. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 973,}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Biriton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is coupled with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Longelorn' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(Longnor: 4,3,15) under the barony of Hugh of}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Kilpeck (4,3,15 Longnor note); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 92a; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Miscellaneous}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 114 no. 236; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
p. 230; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 33; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 18.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Berrington is at SJ528068, Berrington Manor Farm at SJ530068, Berrington Hall at SJ525075.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab AZO [* BIGOT *]. See 4,3,7 Azo note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THORTH [* OF WROXETER *]. }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The Domesday forms of this name - }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Toret}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Tored}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (}{
\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ), }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Tord}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Tort}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Toreth}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{
\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Thoret}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Thored}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  - represent Old Danish }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Thorth}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , Old Norse }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Thorthr}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, pp. 396-97. The printed Phillimore edition has the forms Thored and Thorthr; these have now been standardized as Thorth. The Alecto edition has Thorth.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab On his perhaps being Thorth of Wroxeter, see 4,3,26 Thorth note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ST ANDREW'S. This is the church of Condover (4,1,2); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 320 note 38; and 4,1,2}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  priest }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WHICH PAID TAX. [***]. Or perhaps 'which pay tax' as the present participle }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geld}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 antes}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
] ('paying tax') can refer in a context like this to the present and the past, though the latter is more likely here in view of the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 tenuit }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
earlier in the sentence. The main scribe of Great Domesday left the remaining quarter of a line blank after this before the lordship details, possibly for any change in the hidage or its taxability in 1086.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank two-thirds of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ST PETER'S IN SHREWSBURY. That is, Shrewsbury Abbey: SHR 3b St Peter's note. The gift}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
was of the church and the tithes of Berrington and was made by Warin the sheriff, Reginald's predecessor: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. xiv, xviii, 6, 30, 33, 37, 41 etc.); }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 247b; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. pp. 184, 189.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,3,15\tab LONGNOR?. The later history of Azo's manor suggests that Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lege }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 was replaced by the more specific Longnor which appears as }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Longenorlegh'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  in 1291 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Longnorley}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  in 1586: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 182. Longnor itself was a chapelry of Condover Ancient Parish. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lege }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 lay in Condover Hundred in 1086, as did Longnor later. Azo gave \'bd
 hide in Longnor to Shrewsbury Abbey between 1102 and 1121. The confirmation of Henry I reads }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Atotus bicot }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (i.e. Azo Bigot) }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 aliam dimidiam [hidam] in langanara}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 This is echoed in Henry II's confirmation}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de dono Azonis Bigot dimidiam hidam in Longenalra }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and by King Stephen's charter: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. xxi, 33, 38, 41, 250, 258, 262).}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Of the rest of Longnor (l \'bd hides by Domesday's reckoning) 1 hide at least seems to have followed the same descent as Azo's other lands: from Azo under Reginald to Lestrange under Fitz Alan, although the Fitz Alan ov
erlordship is scarcely alluded to. The tenants-in-fee were the Sprenchose family. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 62b, Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Sprenthose }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds 1 hide in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Long' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from John }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Extraneus. }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Fulk }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Extraneus }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Longenohr }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 230, while in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 973, Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Sprinchose }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and the heirs of Hugh }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Lestrange }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 hold 1 fee in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Biriton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Berrington: 4,3,14) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Longelorn'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
This last statement is headed 'The barony of Hugh }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Kylpec'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  and if not an error (as suspected elsewhere; see 4,4,1Welbatch note;4,4,3 Acton note) may explain Roger the hunter's involvement in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lege }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in 1086 (see 4,3,15 Roger note).
\par \tab \tab }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lege}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (which usually becomes 'Lee' or Leigh' in place-names) is from Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 leah }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
probably meaning here 'an open space' or 'a clearing in a wood'. The area 
will have been extensively covered in the eleventh century by the 'Botwood' and the holding at Longnor abutted the manor of Leebotwood later held by Haughmond Abbey: the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, nos. 693-94). Both manors had woods attached to them and t
here were a number of disputes concerning woodland rights between the holders or their tenants. The parishes of Leebotwood and Longnor are adjacent, but it is unlikely that Leebotwood (perhaps the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Botewde }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
of Domesday: 4,27,13) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lege }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (= Longnor) derived their names from the same 'Lee'. Longnor is from Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 alor }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
'alder' referring to 'tall alders' or a 'long alder wood'. 'Lee' perhaps referred to a large open space, Longnor to the settlement within it; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 48; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 320 note 39, viii. p. 101; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. pp 173, 183.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab AZO [* BIGOT *]. See 4,3,7 Azo note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ALDRED [* BROTHER OF SIWARD *]. }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The Domesday forms of this name - }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Aldred}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ), }{
\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Eldred, Aeldred}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , Aldret}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Aeldret, Eldret}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 - represent}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Old English }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ealdr\'e6d}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, pp. 241-42. JRM preferred the first element Ald- for Old English }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Eald-}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , as it reflected the majority of the spellings in the Domesday forms. The Alecto edition has Ealdr\'e6d.
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Apart from the similar tenurial pattern to his brother Siward - inheritance of their holdings by Mortimer, Lacy and Reginald of Bailleul - the identity of Aldred as the brother of Siward is also suggested by his continued po
ssession of Smethcott (4,27,15) and his acquisition of two other holdings }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 T.R.W}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
. (4,27,33. 7,6) since Aldred is a comparatively uncommon name among post-Conquest landowners, these three being the only ones between the Bristol Channel and the Humber. Another holding, Longnor (4,3,15), is a close neighbour of Smethcott (JP).}{
\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab On the possibility that the Aldred who was Roger of Lacy's predecessor (7,6) was the brother of Siward and the son of Aethelgar, see SHR 7 Roger note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ROGER THE HUNTER ... FROM TAX. The sentence is inelegant and the word order is inverted, but the meaning is clear, the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 t'r\'e2 }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
terram }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 accusative) and the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ii hidae }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (nominative) leaving no doubt that it is Azo's 2 hides that make Roger the hunter's }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 inland }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 free of tax; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 inland}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 however, did not
 usually pay tax so did not need to be exempted (see 4,3,15 inland note). The details that follow lack a place-name but are tantamount to a new section and they properly belong in Roger the hunter's chapter (SHR 4,26). He held Pulverbatch (4,26,4) which i
s four miles from Longnor and a manor of 2 hides, also Wrentnall (4,26,2), also 2 hides, adjacent to Pulverbatch. Moreover, Pulverbatch becomes the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 caput }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
of the barony of Roger's successors (4,26 Roger note) and so could be a candidate for 'the head of the manor'. However, there is no mention of this arrangement under Pulverbatch where 2 hides simply pay tax, nor under Wrentnall, but 1\'bd
 hides of Wrentnall appear to be alienated church land, and it may be that the present arrangement is some form of chicanery
. Nonetheless, the details contained in 'Roger Hunter ... a mill', and perhaps including the value as well appear to refer to a quite separate estate, unnamed, but described as 'the head of the manor'. Thus Roger the hunter may have had another manor in C
ondover Hundred. It was probably adjacent to Pulverbatch whose 1255 hidage (4,26,4 Pulverbatch note) probably included Pulverbatch, these unnamed 2 hides and part of Wrentnall as well; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. pp. 49, 51, 198.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab "INLAND".}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Comparable with, though perhaps less restricted than, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 dominium}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, lordship land, generally cultivated for the owner's use and not let out or given to the villagers; it was usually land near the lord's house and generally exempt from tax; see Vinogradoff, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Growth of the Manor}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 p. 226; Ballard, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The Domesday Inquest}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
pp. 247-48.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab SOLID ENCLOSURES. Domesday has }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hai\'ea firmae}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . The use of}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  firma }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
suggests something more substantial than the etymological meaning of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 haia }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
('a hedge') implies. Perhaps the material of which they were constructed was solid, that is they consisted of banks and palisades, or (as }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 320) they were permanent enclosures; see 3c,2 enclosures note. The Alecto edition has 'secure enclosures'.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,3,16\tab COUND. The Domesday name-form is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Cuneet}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , on which see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 102. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Condover Hundred in 1086 and later. Descent was to Fitz Alan, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Conet }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 being held as 3 \'bd hides by John Fitz Alan in Condover Hundred in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 63a. It is held by the Bishop of Bath (and Wells, i.e. by Robert Burnell) from Richard }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 filius Alani }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 215, and from the Earl of Arundel in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 2
29. Cound is sometimes coupled with Acton Burnell (4,4,3) in later documents; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, i. no. 827, ii. no. 536, iii. no. 194. The difference of 1 hide between the figures given in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  and Domesday is accounted for by }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Arneg' }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Harnage SO5604), 1 hide held by the Abbot of Buildwas in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 62b, granted by Gilbert of Lacy }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Cristeseche }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (from Cressage: 4,10,1); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 260b. On the whole manor, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 69; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 63.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The Domesday estate is represented by Cound and Upper Cound (both at SJ5504).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining half a line after the woodland detail, perhaps for the later insertion of other resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,3,17\tab GOLDING. This was a township of the Ancient Parish of Cound. In 1086 and later, it was in Condover Hundred. The overlordship passed to Fitz Alan but is ignored in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 62b, which imperfectly records the actual state of affairs: Golding was in fact then held by de Rushbury under Fitz Alan and under the former by de Pickford and de Beckbury, but the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  state that the \'bd}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hide in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Golden }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is held by Walter }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
de Pesal }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and Ralph son of Nicholas for the heir of Ralph }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Pick' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Pitchford: 4,19,12 which is adjacent) and by Reginald and William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
de Golden }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of the fee of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rusbur' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Rushbury: 4,8,5); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, v. no. 611; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 97; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 64.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ODO [* OF BERNIERES *]. See 4,3,9 Odo note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,3,18\tab ACTON [PIGOTT]. This lay in the Ancient Parish of Acton Burnell. It was in Condover Hundred in 1086 and later.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Land at }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Actune }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 was left to Burton Abbey }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . 1003 in the will of Wulfric Spot: }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Early Charters of the West Midlands}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 149 no. 144 (= Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , no. 1536). The county in which }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Actune }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
lay, and its exact identity, are uncertain, although the partially geographical arrangement of the will suggests that the place lay in Shropshire. In none of the three Actons in Shropshire that were Domesday manors is there any trace of any connection wit
h Burton Abbey:}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Charters of Burton Abbey}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. xxxi and no. 29.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab After 1086 the overlordship passed to Fitz Alan, the mesne tenancy to Odo's successors, but at a later stage the de Pickfords (see 4,3,17 Golding note) and Robert Burnell acquired an interest. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 62b, three hides in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Acton Pigot }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 are held by six people of}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 the fee of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Kenleg' }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Kenley: 4,3,19, a holding of Odo in 1086); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 569, iii. no. 194, viii. no. 667; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 92; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 8.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ODO [* OF BERNIERES *]. See 4,3,9 Odo note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,3,19\tab KENLEY. This was an Ancient Parish. The place lay in Condover Hundred in 1086 and later. The overlord became Fitz Alan and the mesne tenancy passed from
 Odo to Philip Fitz Odo, then to Petronella Fitz Odo who married Warner of Willey. In the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 962, Petronella }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Kenleg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Kenleg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 with appurtenances from the barony of John Fitz Alan; in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 971, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Kenleg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is associated with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bromcroft' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Broomcroft SJ5601),}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Acton Picot' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Acton Pigott: 4,3,18), and }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Allecot' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (unidentified). In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 62b, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Kenleg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
is 1 hide, a fee of John Fitz Alan held in custody for the son of Nicholas }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Wilileg'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 80b; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 194, viii. no. 451, x. no. 618; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 229, 239; Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 80; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 94.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Kenley is misspelt Kenly in the Penguin edition of the Alecto translation, though it is correct in the Alecto county edition.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ODO [* OF BERNIERES *]. See 4,3,9 Odo note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THE LACK OF POPULATION recorded for this manor may be due to scribal error or an incomplete return or to Kenley's being worked by villagers fro
m another holding, possibly the adjacent Acton Piggott (4,3,18). There is probably a similar case in 4,4,24 (which may have been worked by some of the 13 villagers with their 6 ploughs in neighbouring Montford: 4,4,23) and there are several holdings in Sh
ropshire (such as 3a,1. 3e,2. 4,14,17;27 etc.) which lack much of the manorial detail. Compare 4,3,47 which states there were 'No men there'.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,3,20\tab EATON [MASCOTT]. This was a township of Berrington Ancient Parish. It lay in Condover Hundred in 1086 and la
ter. The overlordship passed to the Fitz Alans and the mesne tenancy was held from the twelfth century by a family named }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Marescot}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 In }
{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 62b, 3 hides in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Eton Marscot }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 are held by William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Marscot }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from John Fitz Alan; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 962, 971; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 239; Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 102; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 20. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 194 (of Philip Burnell), 1 carucate in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Eton Marhcote }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is said to pertain to the manor of Cound (4,3,16).}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THORTH [* OF WROXETER *]. On his name, see 4,3,14 Thorth note and, on his possible identification, see 4,3,26 Thorth note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining half a line after the mill detail, perhaps for the later insertion of the woodland or other resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,3,21\tab EATON [CONSTANTINE]. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Wrockwardine Hundred, later in 'Bradford' Hundred when the Constantine family (named from the Cotentin peninsula in Normandy) held under Fitz Alan. In }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 56a, Thomas }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Costantin' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 2 hides in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Heton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
from the fee of John Fitz Alan by service of guard at Oswestry Castle. It is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ecton Costentin' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 219, and is 
coupled with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Aldebur' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Oldbury: 4,3,68) in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 962, 971; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 228, 237; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 112; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. no. 747; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 1. A half-virgate here was given to Lilleshall Abbey, probably in the time of Henry III.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WYNSIGE. Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wenesi }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 represents Old English }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wynsige.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 2 HIDES [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a gap suitable for about four letters after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ii hide}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ;}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
see 1,5 hide note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab A FISHERY ON THE SEVERN. The river forms the southern boundary of the modern parish.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab A WOOD OF MEDIUM SIZE [TREES]. The Latin }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 silua modica }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
is infrequent in Domesday. Apart from here, it occurs in CHS 8,43. DOR 3,7;9. STS 11,11. 13,4. SOM 1,26. 5,12;17. YKS 5W30. 25W9. 28W33. }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Silua pastilis modica}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  is found in YKS 3Y10-11. }{
\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ibi modicum siluae}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  occurs in CHS 2,23 and }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 siluae minutae modicum}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  in NTT 1,10.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The use of }{\i\insrsid4139880 modicum}{\insrsid4139880  as a substantival adjective should be distinguished from that of }{\i\insrsid4139880 modica}{\insrsid4139880 , simply used adjectively. The former (}{\i\insrsid4139880 
modicum}{\insrsid4139880 ), followed by a partitive genitive means 'a modest or moderate amount of' and is in a sequence with such uses as }{\i\insrsid4139880 siluae aliquantulum}{\insrsid4139880  ('some small quantity of woodland') in GLS 30,3, }{
\i\insrsid4139880 siluae minutae aliquantulum}{\insrsid4139880  ('some small quantity of underwood') in NTT 1,3, }{\i\insrsid4139880 paululum siluae}{\insrsid4139880  ('very little woodland') in HEF 9,3 and }{\i\insrsid4139880 parum silvae minutae}{
\insrsid4139880  ('a small amount of underwood') in DBY 1,32;34.2,2. 6,60;80;94. 9,1;4. 10,18. 17,15-16.
\par \tab \tab On the other hand,}{\i\insrsid4139880  modica}{\insrsid4139880 , like }{\i\insrsid4139880 minuta}{\insrsid4139880 , seems to refer to the size of the trees. That }{\i\insrsid4139880 minuta}{\insrsid4139880 
 has this meaning is shown firstly by the occasional appearance of separate details for }{\i\insrsid4139880 silua}{\insrsid4139880  and for }{\i\insrsid4139880 silua minuta}{\insrsid4139880 
 in the same entry (for example in DEV 1,3;43. 12,1. DOR 3,13. SOM 5,16. 8,1); secondly, by the fact that the dimensions of }{\i\insrsid4139880 silua}{\insrsid4139880  and of }{\i\insrsid4139880 silua minuta}{\insrsid4139880 
 cover the same range and the extent of some }{\i\insrsid4139880 siluae minutae}{\insrsid4139880  is large as in DEV 1,43. 52,34 where in each case a }{\i\insrsid4139880 silua minuta}{\insrsid4139880  is 1 league by \'bd league; many }{\i\insrsid4139880 
siluae}{\insrsid4139880  are measured in small numbers of acres. In SOM 5,17 there is a }{\i\insrsid4139880 silua modica}{\insrsid4139880  \'bd league by \'bd league and in the same entry there is a }{\i\insrsid4139880 silua }{\insrsid4139880 
1 furlong by 1 furlong. Moreover, in three entries for which there are corresponding entries in the }{\i\insrsid4139880 Liber Exoniensis}{\insrsid4139880  (Exon), that is, SOM 1,26. 5,12;17 (= Exon folios 113a, 140a, 141a) the term used in Exon is }{
\i\insrsid4139880 nemusculum}{\insrsid4139880 , which was more normally converted to }{\i\insrsid4139880 silua minuta}{\insrsid4139880  by the main scribe of Great Domesday (on over 70 occasions in Somerset alone). The }{\i\insrsid4139880 Liber Exoniensis
}{\insrsid4139880  also contains two entries relating to the same estate of Abbas Combe (SOM 4,1). In one of them (Exon folio 467a) an Exon scribe uses }{\i\insrsid4139880 nemusculum}{\insrsid4139880 
, in the other (Exon folio 153b) which was written by the main scribe of Great Domesday, }{\i\insrsid4139880 silua minuta}{\insrsid4139880  is used.
\par \tab \tab Theoretically }{\i\insrsid4139880 minuta}{\insrsid4139880  and }{\i\insrsid4139880 modica}{\insrsid4139880  have differen
t meanings ('small', 'thin' for the first, 'of moderate, medium, average size' for the second). However, since it is unlikely that the main scribe of Great Domesday was able to find out whether any particular }{\i\insrsid4139880 nemusculum}{
\insrsid4139880  had small trees in it or medium-size ones, it looks as if the two terms are equivalent. They have, however, here been distinguished in translation, }{\i\insrsid4139880 silua minuta}{\insrsid4139880  as 'underwood' and }{\i\insrsid4139880 
silua modica}{\insrsid4139880  as 'a wood of medium size [trees]'.
\par \tab \tab }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday Studies: Staffordshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 86, refers }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 modica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  
to the size of the trees, suggesting that they are larger than 'underwood' but not full grown. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Staffordshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 49, translates }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 silua modica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 as ' Wood(land) of small trees', but this was altered for t}{\insrsid4139880 he Alecto edition to 'scrubland', }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 its usual translation of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 silua minuta }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(translated in Phillimore by 'underwood').}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\insrsid4139880 The Phillimore printed edition has 'a small wood', the translation usually reserved for }{\i\insrsid4139880 silua parua}{\insrsid4139880 , where the }{\i\insrsid4139880 
parua}{\insrsid4139880  describes the extent of the woodland, not the size of the trees in it (see SHR 4,1,4 wood note).}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining two-thirds of a line after the wood detail, perhaps for the later insertion of other resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HE FOUND IT WASTE}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 inuen' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 abbreviates }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 inuenit}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 as in 4,3,22-23;32 etc.,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
refers to the date at which Roger, or perhaps Reginald the sheriff, acquired the manor;}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 compare 4,3,9 acquired note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,3,22\tab LEIGHTON. This was an Ancient Parish. This holding lay in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 57b, William, lord of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Leheton'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 3 hides in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lechton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
from John Fitz Alan, with service at Oswestry. It included }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Garmston }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 or }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Garmonston }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Garmston SJ6006) according to the }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 112, and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 219; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, pp. 962, 971; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 228, 237; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 325.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 3 HIDES [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a gap suitable for about five letters after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii hid\'ea}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 see 1,5 hide note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,3,23\tab [CHILDS] ERCALL. This was an Ancient Parish also known as Ercall Parva. It lay in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. Part of Childs Ercall was at }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Dodecote }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 or }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Dottecote}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  (Dodecote SJ6723) granted early by William Fitz Alan (I) to the Cistercian Abbey of Combermere: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 55b; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 261a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii. p. 216; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 324 no. iii. By 1255 (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 55b) the abbot was holding 2 hides in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hercalwe Parva}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 half by gift of Elias }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Fanecin}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 the other half from John }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Extraneus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 see }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 261a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 216.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The rest of Childs Ercall continued to be held by Lestrange under Fitz Alan. John }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Extraneus }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Mhutle }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Myddle: 4,3,53) and }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Parva Erkalawe }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from the barony of John Fitz Alan in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 963, and its members are given in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 220, as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Acton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Hungryhatton SJ6726), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Leyes }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (The Lee farm SJ6626) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Golston }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Goldstone SJ7028); see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 227, 237. Another member was }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Naghinton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Naginton SJ6725) which in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 55b, was said to have been given to the Abbot of Haughmond by Hamo}{\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Extraneus }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in pure alms; see the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, nos. 452, 779-82, apendix A. i); }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 113; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 260b; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 220. On the whole manor, see Eyton, 
}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 7.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 3 HIDES [***].The main scribe of Great Domesday left a gap suitable for about five letters after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii hid\'ea}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 see 1,5 hide note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,3,24\tab UPTON [MAGNA]. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. This important manor passed to the Fitz Alan barony: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hupton'}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  is}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 held in}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 56b, by }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
John filius Alani }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from the barony of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Oswaldistre}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 It is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Upton' }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 'with members' in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 221. These members are listed in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 116, as: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Downeton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Downton SJ5412), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Houkynton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Hunkington SJ5613), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Magna Ree }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Parva Ree }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Rea Farm SJ5612), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wroxceter }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Wroxeter: 4,3,26), and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Norton }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Norton SJ5609, a member of Wroxeter). Of these Downton and Rea went to
 Haughmond Abbey which was founded in woodland adjacent to Upton Magna: the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, nos. 288-302, 422, 685, 889, 925-30, 1242, appendix A. i.). Another member was }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 P'ston juxta le Goord }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Preston, formerly Preston Boats or Preston on Severn, SJ5211), held in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 57b, by Stephen }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Stanton' }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 under Fitz Alan and sometimes coupled with Stanton-upon-Hine-Heath and Roden in Rodington (4,3,3;31); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 962, 971; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 236. The tithes of Preston were given to Shrewsbury Abbey by Hunald, an early holder: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. 34, 39). }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pembeleg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(Pimley SJ5214), held in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 57b, by Geoffrey }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Pembeleg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from the Abbot of Shrews
bury, had been given by Fulco the sheriff between 1135 and 1138 to the abbey: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. xix, xx, 42, 47, 48, 250, 258, 263). It was also originally part of Upton Magna. For Haughton (another member), see 4,26,7 Haughton note. On 
the manor as a whole, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 202.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The church of Upton Magna was held by Shrewsbury Abbey: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 247; the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, p. 64 etc.). The predecessor church (see SHR 3b St Peter's note) had held the tithes before 1066: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. 33, 37).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab SIWARD [* THE FAT *]. On the possibility that he was the same person as Siward [the fat], on whom see 4,27,32 Siward note, see 4,1,34 Siward note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,3,25\tab BERWICK. This lay in 
Atcham Ancient Parish. It was in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. It was subsequently held by the Mavison family under Fitz Alan and became known as Berwick Mavison, now represented by Berwick Grove House: }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 42. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 962, 970, Herbert }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Mauveisin }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Berewik' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from the barony of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 John filius Alani. }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The extent is given as \'bd hide in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 56a, with service at Oswestry Castle; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 112; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 511, iii. no. 512, vi. nos. 490, 720; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 219, 236; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 387. See 4,1,20 Berwick note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \'bd HIDE [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a gap suitable for about five letters after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 dimid' hida}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 see 1,5 hide note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [VALUE ***]. The scribe seems to have omitted the value of Berwick in error; see also in 4,3,62 and 4,28,1 (though in these most of the manorial details are also missing) and in 6,7.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,3,26\tab WROXETER. Th
is was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. Wroxeter was held in demesne by the Fitz Alans, the church being given by William Fitz Alan (I) to the monastery at Haughmond: the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, no
s. 1133, 1370-77, 1379, 1381-87, appendix A. i.). In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 56b, John Fitz Alan holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wroccecest' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of his barony of 
}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Osewaldistre}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 228. Norton (4,3,24 Upton note) was a member, as was }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Parva Buldewas }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ('Little Buildwas', lost but }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 SJ642043): }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Lay Subsidy Roll (1334)}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 250. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 58a, 'Little Buildwas' is held by Alan }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Buldewas }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from the Abbot of Buildwas; it is there said to be hidated with Wroxeter; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 228; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 260b; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 118. 'Little Buildwas' had been given by William Fitz Alan I to Buildwas Abbey: Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vii. pp. 309-15.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Part of Donnington (SJ5707), otherwise a member of Eyton-on-Severn (3b,2), appears to have been among members of the estate at Wroxeter. It was given to Haughmond Abbey: the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, no. 1387); }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 260a.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THORTH [* OF WROXETER *]. On the name Thorth, see 4,3,14 T
horth note. He is identifiable as Thorth of Wroxeter, who was named from this holding and who was ancestor of the Fitz Torets. Other occurrences of Thorth both as a }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 and a 1086 holder (4,3,14;20;30-31;69. 4,27,10) may well be to this man: Williams, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The English and the Norman Conquest}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 90; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 428.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 4 PRIESTS. This plurality is the sign of a superior church. On the possibility that this was the minster church, see \{Introduction: Ecclesiastical Organization\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WOODLAND, 1 LEAGUE [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the rest of the line after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 leuua }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
which has no dot after it, peraps for another resource; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,3,27\tab HADLEY. This lay in Wellington Ancient Parish, but is now its own Civil Parish. It was in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. Before the death of Earl Roger, Geoffrey had given \'bd
 hide here to Shrewsbury Abbey: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. xx, 6, 30, 33, 39, 41, 256). The name-form there is generally }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Herlega }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 or }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Herleia }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (pointing to Harley (4,21,8) although that is not held by Geoffrey in 1086), but }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hetlega }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(pointing to Hadley) is the form on p. 41. The overlordship passed to the Fitz Alans, the mesne tenant in the time of Henry I being William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Hadley }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
who with his wife Seburga and sons founded the priory of Wombridge dedicated to St Leonard for Augustinian canons in Hadley Wood }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
. 1130-1135. This area also lay in the royal forest of Mount Gilbert. The foundation was confirmed by William Fitz Alan; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 80; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 387; Knowles and Hadcock,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Medieval Religious Houses}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 159; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, xi. p. 283. This small ecclesiastical establishment in a wood, originally extra-parochial, was the nucleus of Oakengates and later of the new town of Telford: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iii. p. 39.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Cecily, daughter of Alan of Hadley, married Roger Corbet of Tasley and the manor then descended in the Corbet family. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 57a, Roger }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Corbet' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hedleg' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from John Fitz Alan; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 219, 227; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 112; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 352; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 256; and 4,3,2 Hatton note.}{
\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WIHTRIC <OF HADLEY>. }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The Domesday forms of this name - }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wihtric}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ), }{
\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wictric}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wicstricus}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wistricus}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wistrinc}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{
\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Witric}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  - represent Old English }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wihtric}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 414. In the Phillimore printed translation for DBY 6,7 and for BRK 31,6 the form Wictric was used; it has been standardized for the present edition. The Alecto edition has Wihtric.
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Note to be supplied on this identification (JP).}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab GEOFFREY [* THE SH
ERIFF *]. There are three occurrences of the name Geoffrey in Domesday Shropshire (4,3,27. 4,4,20. 6,8). They may refer to the same individual. One of them, Geoffrey the sheriff, was a benefactor of Shrewsbury Abbey where his son Achard became a monk and 
this Geoffrey may be the same as the Geoffrey who was the sheriff of the area that later became Lancashire under Roger of Poitou, son of Earl Roger; see Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 232, whose Shropshire references are to 4,3,27 and 6,8 only. For the occurrences of Geoffrey the sheriff in the Shrewsbury Cartulary, see Rees, pp. 35, 40, 42, 44, 79, 80, 259, 262, 306, 337. See STS 8,25 Geoffrey note.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Gosfrid'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Farley misprinted }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Goisfrid'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining quarter of a line after the woodland detail, perhaps for the later insertion of another resource; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,3,28\tab DAWLEY [PARVA]. The land was at Dawley Parva which was part of Dawley (Magna). Dawley Magna 
was a chapelry of Shifnal, then its own Ancient Parish: 4,1,22 Dawley note. It lay in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086. Dawley Parva did not retain its independence; by the thirteenth century it was considered as part of Leegomery manor (4,3,30): Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 349; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 113.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab BENEDICT <OF DAWLEY>. Apart from Abbot Benedict of Selby, the only other occurrence of this name in Domesday is as a subtenant of Earl Roger in Staffordshire (STS 8,7), probably the same man as the Benedict here.}{
\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab SIGSTEINN. This is the only occurrence of this name in Domesday Book.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 HIDE. [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ibi i hida}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 over an erasure; the surface of the parchment was not properly re-prepared after the erasure, as the words are blurred. In the central margin, level with this correction, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [Ibi] i hid' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
was originally by the scribe and then presumably erased when the hidage was inserted in the text (though still partially visible). It is not reproduced in the Ordnance Su
rvey facsimile and is not visible in the Alecto facsimile; Farley of course did not print it. On these marginal notes, see C6 accident note. On the space left after the hidage (suitable for about four letters), see 1,5 hide note.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,3,29\tab 2 HIDES AND 2 PARTS OF 1 HIDE. Neither the name nor the situation has been discovered: Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 350; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 321 note 40.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab RICHARD [* THE BUTLER *]. He is probably Reginald's butler; see 4,1,5 Richard note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab VILLAGERS. Latin }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 uill' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 could be extended to the accusative }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 uillanos }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and be the object of }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 h}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 abe}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 t }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in the line above, like the slaves. }{
\cf1\lang1036\langfe2057\cgrid0\langnp1036\insrsid4139880 Compare 2,2 villagers note, 4,1,19 villagers note, 4,20,8 ploughmen note and 6,11 villagers note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank half a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 3 SMALLHOLDERS. The main scribe of Great Domesday corrected the number over an erasure; it is blurred because the parchment had not been properly re-prepared after the erasure.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 6 OXEN PLOUGHING. That is, 6 oxen actually at work, as also at 4,4,9 with 5 oxen. This corrects the 'ploughing oxen' of the Phillimore printed translation. 
The villagers had 5 oxen in 4,4,16 and there were only 3 oxen on the holding at Buttery, 4,14,17. There were normally reckoned to be 8 oxen to a plough-team, but there is evidence for smaller teams in the south-west; see Lennard, 'Domesday Plough-Teams'; 
Lennard, 'Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 caruca}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
'; Finberg, 'Domesday Plough team'; DEV 3,37 oxen note. In Herefordshire there is evidence that, at least on the king's lordship land, a plough-team of 6 oxen was the norm; HEF 1,50 oxen note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 \'bd PLOUGHS WOULD BE POSSIBLE THERE. T
his sentence was probably added in the space left after the value statement, as it is misplaced and extends well into the right margin. However, similar statements are misplaced in a number of other entries and there is no indication that they were added 
there (1,8. 3c,8. 4,1,5 (Richard the butler's subholding). 4,1,23;27. 4,3,25. 4,4,3;10. 4,8,5). The singular }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 posset }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is used here after '1 \'bd'}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
as on many other occasions in Great Domesday (see, for example, 4,14,18), though not invariably (see, for example, 4,26,3 with the 1\'bd hides claimed).}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,30\tab LEEGOMERY. This was formerly a township of Wellington Ancient Parish, but is now in Hadley Civil Parish. It lay in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086 and was later in 'Bradford' Hundred. Unusually Reginald's 1086 lordship
 does not survive to pass to the Fitz Alans after the fall of Robert of Bell\'eame; the manor appears to have lapsed to the Crown and was first held by a family named }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Cambrai }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (who gave their name to the manor)
}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 then by one called }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Tuchet}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 57b, John }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Mansel }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds 4 hides in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lega Cu'brey }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from the fee of Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Thocet}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 219; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 156, v. no. 515, ix. no. 250. These 4 hides will have been composed of three from Leegomery itse
lf (which had a number of members) and one from Dawley Parva (4,3,28) which became part of the manor. The members are given in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 219, as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Parva Dalileye }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Dawley Parva: 4,3,28), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Malineleye }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Malins Lee Hall SJ69090 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Watmundeshale }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Wappenshall SJ6614); the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 112, adds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Ketley }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Ketley SJ6710); see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 339; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. pp. 219, 267.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab THORTH [* OF WROXETER *]. On his name, see 4,3,14 Thorth note and, on his possible identification, see 4,3,26 Thorth note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 3 HIDES [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a gap suitable for about four letters after }{\i\f703\cf1\insrsid4139880 iii hid\'ea}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 see 1,5 hide note.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,31\tab REGINALD. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote his name over an erasure; there is an erased memo in the centre margin next to it. On these marginal notes, see C6 accident note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab RODINGTON. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086; later in 'Bradford' Hundred. The overlordship passed to Fitz Alan and it is clear from }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 56a,b, that the 4 hides of Rodington consisted of 1 \'bd}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 hides at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rodinton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 itself held by four people from John Fitz Alan, 1 hide at 
}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Suggedon' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Sugdon SJ6014) and l \'bd hides at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rodene }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Roden SJ5716; see 4,1,25 Donington note) held by Thomas }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Le }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
and then considered to be a member of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stanton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Stanton-upon-Hine-Heath; see 4,3,3 Stanton note). Four men held }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rodinton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and half }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
of Suggedon }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (see 4,11,18 Isombridge note) in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 220 (see}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 962; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 237), while in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 962, 971, Stephen }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Stanton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stanton'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Rodene }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Preston' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Preston SJ5211; see 4,3,3 Stanton note and 4,3,24 Upton note) from the barony of John Fitz Alan. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 219, these are }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Preston}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Standon}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Rodene }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rodenehurst }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Rodenhurst SJ5815); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 p. 112; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 236. On Rodington, see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 91; on Rodenhurst }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 361; on Sugdon, see 
}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 194, v. no. 611. On the manor as a whole, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 373.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab THORTH [* OF WROXETER *]. On his name, see 4,3,14 Thorth note and, on his possible identification, see 4,3,26 Thorth note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 4 HIDES AND 1 VIRGATE [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a gap suitable for about five letters after }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 uirg'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
see 1,5 hide note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining two-thirds of a line after the mill detail, perhaps for the later insertion of the woodland or other resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,32\tab IN "MERSET" HUNDRED. Halston and the other estates listed by Domesday as far as 4,3,42, including the two Welsh areas, had passed from t
he county by the thirteenth century and into the Fitz Alan lordship of Oswestry or its associated}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
lordships. With the exception of the Welsh areas they only returned to the county in 1536 at the dissolution of the Marcher lordships; see \{Introduction: County Boundary\}and \{Introduction: Hundreds\}
. They are thus absent from the usual English records of the period. Several are, however, included in the Inquisition Post Mortem of John Fitz Alan (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, i. no. 812) and in the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Close Rolls}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Henry III (AD 1268-1272)}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 509-11, where they form part of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Waleschyria de Blancmustir }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ('the Welshry of Oswestry'); see also Clough, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Fitz Alan Surveys}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 66-74; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Miscellaneous}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, vi. no. 235 (= }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , (old series) iii. pp. 222-23); and 4,1,11 Oswestry note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab HALSTON. This lay in Wittington Ancient Parish. A preceptory for the Hospitalers was established here between 1165 and 1187; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 87; Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 380; and 4,27,31 Halston note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab IN THE ORDNANCE SURVEY FACSIMILE there are three red blotches between the second and third lines of this entry; they are not in the manuscript or in the Alecto facsimile. They must be blots made when the red ink was applied}{
\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 to the Ordnance Survey facsimile as a separate exercise (the photozincographic process only reproduced the dark brown ink of the main text initially).}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,33\tab WESTON [RHYN]. This formerly lay in St Martin's (Llanfarthyn) Ancient Parish, the parish name being from a Chapel of Oswestry, itself part of Maesbury (4,1,11) in 1086, that was founded near here (at SJ3236). }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\f710\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 309, takes the view that Weston is the 'west t\'fbn' in relation to St Martin's; it is also }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
west of Ellesmere, but the early relationship of Ellesmere to Maesbury (if any) is unknown. Weston Rhyn is now a Civil Parish in its own right. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Weston }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is mentioned among the members of Oswestry in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 812 (of John Fitz Alan); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. no. 90; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Close Rolls}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Henry III (AD 1268-1272)}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 p. 509; Clough, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Fitz Alan Surveys}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 69; the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 pp. 284, 285); Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 361.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,34\tab MORTON AND "AITONE".}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Aitone }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
cannot be identified or located; Morton was formerly a township of Oswestry Ancient Parish, but is now its own Civil Parish. It is later held of the fee of Knockin, that is of Lestrange of Ness under Fitz Alan; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of I
nquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (old series), iii. p. 223 (see 4,3,43 Osbaston note), (new series) iv. no. 90 (where }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Morton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 pays rent and customs to the Earl of Arundel); Clough, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Fitz Alan Surveys}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 70; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 364.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par \tab \tab The Grid Reference (SJ2924) is for Morton itself. Morton Farm and Morton Common lie in the same grid square; Morton Hall and Lower Morton are at SJ3023.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab A SMALL TRACT OF [WILD] WOODLAND. Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 parua landa siluae}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 landa }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is 'untilled land', 'heathland', the opposite of
 the equally rare (in Domesday) phrase }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 cultura terrae}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  ('one piece of ploughland'), which is only found in LIN CN,4. SUR 14,1 and (without }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 terrae}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
) in CHS R2,2. Compare 4,1,4 wood note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,35\tab MAESBROOK. This is now a Civil Parish; it was formerly a township of Kinnerley Ancient Parish. It was held by Lestrange under Fitz Alan; see 4,3,43 Osbaston note; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 377.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 2 HIDES. There is no dot after }{\i\f703\cf1\insrsid4139880 hid\'ea}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 half of which is written in the margin; the main scribe of Great Domesday p
robably intended to write even further into the margin when he had discovered whether the hides paid tax or not. He probably meant the margin to be used also in 4,3,50;52-54. 4,11,14. 4,28,6, and possibly in 4,5,2 (but see 4,5,2 hides note), as he did not
 put a dot after the hidage there either. On the spaces he left after the hidage for the taxability to be added, see 1,5 pay note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab HE PAYS 5s. Although }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 redd' v solid' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 could be translated 'It (i.e. the manor) pays 5s', this is unlikely in view of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 redd}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 [}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 un}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 t }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in the next three entries clearly referring to the Welshmen: they seem to have 'farmed' these manors (see 3d,5 revenue note on this practice).}{\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,36\tab 'TIBETONE'. Although unlocated, this place}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 survived into the Middle Ages and is counted as a member of Oswestry in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}
{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 812 (of John Fitz Alan).}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 In the Fitz Alan Surveys, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Tyletoun }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(perhaps not the same place) is identified in the index with Llwyntidmon (SJ2920) although the grounds for this are unclear (Clough, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Fitz Alan Surveys}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 71, 177). }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lontudemon }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 certainly appears in a list of lands, rents and customs due to Oswestry in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. no. 90 of Richard Earl of Arundel. Both in the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 812, and the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Close Rolls}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Henry III (AD 1268-1272)}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 509, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Tibeton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is associated with }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Treveltholvel }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Blodowauhan }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Treprenal SJ2821 and Blodwel SJ2622).}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab LIKE MANY OTHERS. There is no dot after }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 alia }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
and the remainder of the line (room for about 15 letters) is blank; it is unlikely, however, that the main scribe of Great Domesday intended to add their names.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,37\tab MELVERLEY. This was an Ancient Parish. It was held under Fitz Alan by Lestrange of Knockin; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. no. 264, where }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Milverlegh }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is held by John }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lestrange }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from Edmund, Earl of Arundel; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 377.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,38\tab WESTON [COTON]. The Domesday form is }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Westune}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
. It lay in the Ancient Parish of Oswestry. There are two adjacent places, once separate estates but now combined, Weston and Weston Coton, representing the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Weston }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Cotun }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 812 (of John Fitz Alan); see}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. no. 90; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Close Rolls Henry III (AD 1268-1272)}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 509; Clough, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Fitz Alan Surveys}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 65, 72; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 360. Cotton is one mile north of Weston: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 308.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab WELSHMEN. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Waleis }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 here (and also in 4,3,39-40. 4,20,5. 4,20,8 sub-holding and 4,27,4;25) is apparently an error for }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Walenses}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, used}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 elsewhere: at some stage in the Domesday process an}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 abbreviation overline has been lost and the result misread as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Waleis }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (the normal abbreviation for }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Walenses }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 would probably be }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wal'ses}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in line with }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 burg'ses }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 for }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 burgenses}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ).}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab THEY WERE WASTE. Domesday has }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 wasta fuer}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 unt}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ],}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 wasta }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 agreeing with an understood }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 maneria}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 that is the manors of 4,3,37-38.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,39\tab WOOTTON. This was a township of Oswestry Ancient Parish. The Robert who held under Reginald was probably Robert the butler since }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wodeto'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  with}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Asto' }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Aston: 4,6,6) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hydeslont}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (Hisland; 4,6,6 Aston note) are said in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , 
ii. p. 89b, to belong to the honour of Montgomery (to which Robert's lands descend), though taken from Chirbury Hundred by John Fitz Alan (see 4,6,6 Aston note). Clearly Wootton belonged to his barony and all three places together with }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Twyford }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bromehurst }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (4,6,6 Aston note) are counted among knights' fees in the Inquisition of John Fitz Alan: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 812; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 7; Clough, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Fitz Alan Surveys}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 68, 74.

\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The Grid Reference (SJ3327) is to Wootton, Wootton House and Wootton Fields. Wootton Farm and Wootton Castle are at SJ3427.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab ROBERT [* THE BUTLER *]. Apparently Robert the butler, because of the descent of the estate; see 4,3,39 Wootton note. Robert was Earl Roger's butler, not Reginald's, and held a small sub-fief of his own (SHR 4,6).}{\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 2 HIDES. [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a gap suitable for about four letters after }{\i\f703\cf1\insrsid4139880 ii hid\'ea.}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 see 1,5 hide note.}
{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab WELSHMEN. See 4,3,38 Welshmen note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,40\tab WOOLSTON. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Osuluestune}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 This lay in West Felton Ancient Parish. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Osselton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
is among knights' fees held from John Fitz Alan in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 812, where it is coupled with }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Samford }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(Sandford SJ3423); see Clough, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Fitz Alan Surveys}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 73; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Miscellaneous}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. no. 235 p. 112; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. no. 321. Half a virgate in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Sonforde }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 was given to Haughmond Abbey; see the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, nos. 462, 757, 1112-18); Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 378.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab WELSHMEN. See 4,3,38 Welshmen note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,41\tab [WEST] FELTON. This was an Ancient Parish. It seems to have been held by Lestrange under Fitz Alan. A member was }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Teddesmere }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(Tedsmore SJ3625) which a tenant of Lestrange gave to Haughmond Abbey: the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, nos. 141, 1201-1204); Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, xi. p. 1. Richard, Earl of Arundel, had the advowson of the church of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Felton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 according to }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Miscellaneous}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 112 no. 235. The
 'West' distinguishes this place from Felton Butler (4,21,10).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,42\tab 2 DISTRICTS ... CYNLLAITH AND EDEYRNION. The Latin uses the imprecise term }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 finis }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
('land, territory') where the Welsh 'commote' seems required, as at 4,1,13. Along with Nanheudwy (4,1,13)
 and Ial (4,2,1) these territories seem to have been occupied by Earl Roger (or by Reginald acting for him) as part of the Norman thrust into North Wales. They were presumably attached to the Hundred of "Merset" where Reginald was predominant, or to his c
astle of Oswestry (4,1,11). See Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 46; Edwards, 'Normans and the Welsh March', p. 158; Lloyd, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 History of Wales}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ii. p. 389; Lloyd, 'Wales and the Coming of the Normans', p. 160;}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab COWS. See 4,20,8 for another example of animals being used as payment, and compare the render of a pig from a mill in Lydham (4,1,14).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,43\tab [IN "MERSET" HUNDRED]. The head is supplied because of the identity and location of Osbaston and Kynaston. They lay in Kinnerley which itself is directly below a "Merset" hundred head at 4,27,4.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab OSBASTON AND KYNASTON. Both places were townships of Kinnerley Ancient Parish. They were held by Lestrange under Fitz Alan. One of the Lestrange family enfeoffed the Haughtons here and erected his castle of Knockin
, perhaps in the mid-twelfth century; see King, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Castellarium Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 426. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. (old series) p. 223 (= }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Miscellaneous}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. no. 236) John Lestrange of Knockin is tenant of 2 knights' fees under Fitz Alan which included }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Northslepe }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(unidentified), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Kynaston}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Dovaston }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Dovaston SJ3421), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Maysbrok }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Maesbrook: 4,3,35), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Morton }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Morton: 4,3,34), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Knokyn }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Knockin SJ3322) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Osbaston}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 187, v. no. 264; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 365.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ALWY. }{\insrsid4139880 The Domesday forms of the name-form Alwy - }{\i\insrsid4139880 Aluui}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Aluuius}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Eluui}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 
Aeluui}{\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\insrsid4139880 us}{\insrsid4139880 ) - could represent Old English }{\i\insrsid4139880 \'c6lfwig}{\insrsid4139880 , Old English }{\i\insrsid4139880 \'c6thelwig}{\insrsid4139880  or Old English }{\i\insrsid4139880 Ealdwig}{
\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\insrsid4139880 , pp. 157-58, under }{\i\insrsid4139880 Al-wig}{\insrsid4139880 , and see also p. 142, under }{\i\insrsid4139880 Al-}{\insrsid4139880 
. JRM followed von Feilitzen in keeping to the base form, but preferred the second element -wy for Old English }{\i\insrsid4139880 -wig}{\insrsid4139880  as it reflected the spelling in Domesd
ay. Some of the people called Alwy in the present edition appear under Alfwy in the Phillimore printed translations. The Alecto edition has Alwig for those appearing under }{\i\insrsid4139880 Al-wig}{\insrsid4139880 
. Some of those called Alwy in the present edition appear under Old English }{\i\insrsid4139880 \'c6thelwig}{\insrsid4139880  in von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\insrsid4139880 
, pp. 189-90, followed by Alecto, but the Domesday forms (}{\i\insrsid4139880 Ailwius}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Ailuuin}{\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\insrsid4139880 us}{\insrsid4139880 ), }{\i\insrsid4139880 Ailuin}{\insrsid4139880 (}{
\i\insrsid4139880 us}{\insrsid4139880 ), }{\i\insrsid4139880 Aelwi}{\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\insrsid4139880 us}{\insrsid4139880 ], }{\i\insrsid4139880 Aeluuin}{\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\insrsid4139880 us}{\insrsid4139880 ], }{\i\insrsid4139880 Aluui}{
\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Aluui}{\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\insrsid4139880 us}{\insrsid4139880 ], }{\i\insrsid4139880 Aluuin}{\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\insrsid4139880 us}{\insrsid4139880 ) etc.) lack the medial }{\i\insrsid4139880 -d-}{\insrsid4139880 
 or }{\i\insrsid4139880 -g-}{\insrsid4139880  that JRM thought was necessary for inclusion under that name. On the confusion between the second elements }{\i\insrsid4139880 -wig}{\insrsid4139880  and }{\i\insrsid4139880 -wine}{\insrsid4139880 
, see von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\insrsid4139880 , \'a7 148.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,44\tab CARDINGTON. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in "Culvestan" H
undred in 1086, later in Munslow Hundred. William Fitz Alan (I) gave Cardington, Enchmarsh (SO5096) and half of Chatwall (SO5097) to the Knights Templar who were established at the nearby Lydley (4,27,12 Lydley note). Thus in 1284 (}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 225) the master of the Templars holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Carditon }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 which is said to be a gift of Alan son of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Ploc}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
. This last name may be a mistaken representation of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Flaad }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 but he died too early to have granted lands to the Templars who reached England in the reign of Stephen. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Cardynton }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 belongs to the Templars in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 167b, but reverted to Fitz Alan on the suppression of the order }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 . 1311. }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Carditon }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is held by the Earl of Arundel in 1316: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 229.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Half a}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 hide was held by the Templars of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lidleg' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Chatewalle}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 71a), the other }{\scaps\cf1\insrsid4139880 \'bd}{\i\scaps\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 hide there being held by William Fitz Alan }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Draiton' }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 from Gilbert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Buckenhull}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 : }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. no. 611. Chatwall had originally been part of the estaste at Pla
ish (4,8,12): }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 29.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab A further part of Cardington was at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wiluriston }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Willstone SO4995), where 2 hides were held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 71a, by Peter }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Muneton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 who did suit at the court of John Fitz Alan at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Upton' sub Haemon' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Upton Magna: 4,3,24); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees
}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 962, 971; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 244; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, i. no. 473. The Templars seem to have held Willstone briefly, withdrawing suit from the hundred court: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 100b. On the whole manor, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 122; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 26. On the Templars here and at Lydley, see Lees,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Records of the Templars in England}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. cvi-cvii, cxi-cxiii, 26, 37-41.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,45\tab [MUNSLOW] ASTON. Aston lay in Munslow An
cient Parish, and in "Culvestan" Hundred in 1086, later in Munslow Hundred. Munslow itself would have been included in Aston in 1086. There must, however, be some uncertainty about the identification since it does not descend to Fitz Alan. Eyton suggested
 that as the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 caput }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 of Munslow Hundred it may have been retained for a time by the Crown. It ultimately descended to the Hastings family: in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 71a, 2 hides }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 in Munsel' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Munslow SO5288) and 2 hides in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Aston' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 are held of the fee of Henry }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Hastinges}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 while in the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 964, Henry }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Hastenc }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Eston' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Mosselawe }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in chief from the king; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 223, 229, 245; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 129; 
}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 55.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ALMUND [* FATHER OF ALWARD *]. }{\insrsid4139880 The Domesday forms of the name-form Almund - }{\i\insrsid4139880 Elmund}{\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\insrsid4139880  Elmund}{\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\insrsid4139880 us}{\insrsid4139880 ],}
{\i\insrsid4139880  Almund}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Almund}{\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\insrsid4139880 us}{\insrsid4139880 ], }{\i\insrsid4139880 Aelmund}{\insrsid4139880  - could represent either Old English}{\i\insrsid4139880  \'c6thelmund}{
\insrsid4139880  or Old English }{\i\insrsid4139880 Ealhmund}{\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\insrsid4139880 , p. 149, under }{\i\insrsid4139880 Al-mund}{\insrsid4139880 
, and see also p. 142, under }{\i\insrsid4139880 Al-}{\insrsid4139880 . JRM followed von Feilitzen in keeping to the base form, as does the Alecto edition.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab This man was apparently the father of Alward; see 4,27,17 Almund note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab 8 \'bd HIDES. Scribe B interlined }{\i\insrsid4139880 7 dimid'}{\insrsid4139880 , indicating its position in the text below with an insertion mark.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab MEASURES OF WHEAT. Domesday has }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 mensuris frumenti}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 . The measure is of uncertain size. The same word is used of salt (from}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Droitwich) in GLS 18,1. See 4,27,21 measures note and 5,8 measure note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining two-thirds of a line after the mill detail, perhaps for the later insertion of the woodland or other resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,46\tab CLUNGUNFORD. This was an Ancient Parish. It was in Leintwardine Hundred in 1086, later in Munslow Hundred. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Clone }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 has acquired the name of its }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
T.R.E.}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  holder Gunward as a termination. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 70b, the 2 hides seem to be represented by 1 \'bd hides in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Sheldreton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(Shelderton SO4077) and \'bd}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 hide in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Weho }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Weo and View Edge SO4180, SO4280), held by Walter }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Hopton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
from John Fitz Alan; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 223; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 163b; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, xi. p. 297; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 322 note 43; and 4,20,12 Hopton note; 4,20,24 Clungunford note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab FULCO [* OF LE PIN *]. }{\insrsid4139880 The Domesday forms of his name - }{\i\insrsid4139880 Fulco}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Fulcho}{\insrsid4139880  - represent Old German }{\i\insrsid4139880 Fulco}{
\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Folco}{\insrsid4139880 : Forssner, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Continental-Germanic Personal Names in England}{\insrsid4139880 , p. 98. Some 
of the people named Fulco in the present edition appear as Fulk in some of the Phillimore printed translations; these have now been standardized as Fulco. The Alecto edition has Fulk}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  here.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab It is probable that all occurrences of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Fulco}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  in Shropshire refer to the same man; certainly a }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Fulco}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 holds both parts of Clungunford (4,3,46. 4,20,24). He may be the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Fulco}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Pino}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  mentioned by Orderic Vitalis, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Ecclesiastical History }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Chibnall, iii. pp. 141-42; she calls him Fulk of Le Pin). Le Pin may be the place of that name in the French d\'e9partement of Calvados (arrondissement and canton Lisieux).}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Mason, 'Officers and Clerks',}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 p. 247, mentions a Fulco the sheriff, but as he has j
ust mentioned a Fulcuius the sheriff (or under-sheriff) who was tenant of Withington and Little Wytheford (Fulcwy: 4,27,2-3), he may have confused the two: certainly the Fulco the sheriff 'whose existence is alleged by the Shrewsbury Cartulary', is }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Fulcoius}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (= Fulcwy), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 pace}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  Rees, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Cartulary of Shrewsbury Abbey}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , index, under Fulk, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Fulco}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , the sheriff (all the cartulary references are to }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Fulcoius}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ). Green, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 English Sheriffs}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 72, also calls the person in the Shrewsbury Cartulary Fulk, but says he is only possibly to be identified with the Fulk of folio 259b (that is, Fulcwy of 4,27,2-3). Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 202, under Fulco with references apparently corresponding to 4,3,46. 4,20,20;24-25;27 (though she omits a second reference for folio 258b), correctly reports that Domesday 'carefully distinguishes' between the names }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Fulco}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880  (Fulco) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Fulcoius}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (see 4,27,2 Fulcwy note). However, she calls Fucoius a 'tenant of Rainald de Balliol, Roger's sheriff', when in fact he held directly from Earl Roger, an err
or she repeats on p. 203, under Fulcuius (where her folio references are to 4,27,2-3). She mentions (p. 202) that Fulco may be identifiable with the sheriff Fulk, and refers to Green, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 English Sheriffs}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 72 (see above). On p. 203, however, she rejects the identification that Fulcuius (not Fulco) was an under-sheriff (reference to Mason, 'Officers and Clerks', p. 247). It would thus seem that Earl Roger's sheriff (or under-sheriff) was called }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Fulcoius}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (Fulcwy) and that he was the tenant of that name in 4,27,2-3, but that he was a separate person from the Fulco in the present entry and in 4,20,20;24-25;27.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab GUNNVARTH. The Domesday forms of this name - }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Gunuuard}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 us}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ], }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Gunuuar}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  - represent Old Norse }
{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Gunnvarthr}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 278. JRM did not include the final -r in his rendering of Old Norse names. The Phillimore printed edition has Gunward for the only three occurrences of this name in Domesday (here, in 4,20,24 and in 6,23). The Alecto edition has Gunnvarthr.
\par \tab \tab According to von Feilitzen (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 ibidem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 278 note 3) his name survived in Clungunford, which he had held here and in 4,20,24. He is probably the same person as the Gunnvarth in 6,23.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a third of a line after the hedged enclosures detail, perhaps for the later insertion of the woodland or other resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,47\tab STREFFORD. This lay in Wistanstow Ancient Parish. It was in Leintwardine Hundred in 1086, later in Munslow Hundred. It descended to the Fitz Alans and was held under them by a family called English. In }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 70a (1255), John Fitz Alan holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Strefford }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Marhse}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 3 \'bd hides, for the heir of Hugh Anglicus. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 223, Hugh }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 le Engleys }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Mersse }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Schereford }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from Richard son of Alan. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 229, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Marsh }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is coupled with }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Scotus Acton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Acton Scott: 4,27,33) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Foldhampton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Felhampton SO4487; see 9,1 Wistanstow note), all held by the Earl of Arundel; see Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 366; and 4,20,4 Clunbury note. The increase in the hidage between 1086 and 1255 is accounted for by the fact that }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Marhse }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 or }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Mersse }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Marsh farm SO4488) had originally been part of Wistanstow (9,1) which had been alienated from the church of St Alkmund and dismembered.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab AZO [* BIGOT *]. See 4,3,7 Azo note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ALMUND [* FATHER OF ALWARD *]. See 4,3,45 Almund note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,48\tab HENLEY. This lay in Bitterley Ancient Parish. It lay in 'Overs' Hundred in 1086, later in Munslow Hundred. From the Fitz Alan barony, it passed to that of de Lacy (4,8 Roger note). In the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 964, 972, Philip }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Clinton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds half a}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 fee in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hennele }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
from the barony of Walter }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Lasey}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 224, 245; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, vi. no. 54, vii. no. 710; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 374.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ROGER [* OF LACY *]. In view of the descent of Henley (4,3,48 Henley note) it is likely that Roger here is Roger of Lacy: Lewis, 'Introduction', }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Shropshire Domesday}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 9.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ALMUND [* FATHER OF ALWARD *]. See 4,3,45 Almund note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,49\tab [ENGLISH] FRANKTON. It now lies in Cockshutt Civil Parish, but was formerly in Ellesmere Ancient Parish of which Cockshutt was a chapelry.. It lay in Baschurch Hundred in 1086 and was later in Pimhill Hundred. In }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 75a, Richard }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Franketon' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds 2 hides in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Franketon' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
of the fee of John Fitz Alan. Richard appears to have been the successor to Eynon FitzOwein who held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 962, 970, from the Fitz Alan barony; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 236; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Pimhill Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 120; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 106; and 4,1,18 Loppington note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Welsh Frankton is at SJ3633 between Whittington and Ellesmere.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ALDGYTH <OF WELSHAMPTON>. }{\insrsid4139880 The Domesday forms of this name - }{\i\insrsid4139880 Alded}{\insrsid4139880  here, elsewhere }{\i\insrsid4139880 Aeldiet}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Aeldit}{
\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Aeldid}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Eldit}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Eldid}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Aldgid}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Aldiet}{\insrsid4139880 , }{
\i\insrsid4139880 Aldid(a)}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Aldeda}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Aldi}{\insrsid4139880  - represent the feminine Old English }{\i\insrsid4139880 Ealdgyth}{\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid4139880 
Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\insrsid4139880 , pp. 240-41. JRM preferred the first element Ald- for Old English }{\i\insrsid4139880 Eald-}{\insrsid4139880 
, as it reflected the spelling in the Domesday forms. However, the name-form Aldith appears in several Phillimore printed translations, as also do Alded and Aldgeat; these have all now been standardized as Aldgyth. The Alecto edition ha
s Ealdgyth. Von Feilitzen states }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 that all the Shropshire entries refer to the same tenant (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 ibidem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 240 note 5). Welshampton was one of the estates held by Aldgyth.}{\insrsid4139880 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Von Feilitzen's attribution to one individual is presumably based upon the tight cluste
ring of these estates, which makes the identification probable. It is tempting to connect this Aldgyth with Aldgyth, daughter of Earl Algar, widow of King Gruffydd, and wife of King Harold Godwinson; see WOR 19,13 Aldgyth note (JP).}{\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,50\tab SHRAWARDINE. Thi
s was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Baschurch Hundred in 1086 and was later in Pimhill Hundred. A castle was built here, probably in the time of Henry I, and it became an important centre of the Fitz Alan barony, receiving rents from a number of manors and
 the service of guarding the castle from a number of Fitz Alan tenants. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 76a, John Fitz Alan holds 1 \'bd hides from the king in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Sciewardin'}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , a member of his barony of Oswestry; see the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Pimhill Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 119; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 215; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 812, iv. no. 90; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Close Rolls Henry III (AD 1268-1272)}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 506; Clough, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Fitz Alan Surveys}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 81; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 94.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Edenestone }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Ensdon SJ4016) was a member: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 215. The tithes of Shrawardine were given to Shrewsbury Abbey soon after 1086 by Reginald and by Hugh, son of his predecessor Warin: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. 33, 38, 41, 43, etc.).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 2 HIDES [***]. In the manuscript there is no dot after }{\i\f703\cf1\insrsid4139880 hid\'ea }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
which extends right up to the side ruling, so the main scribe of Great Domesday probably intended the margin to be used when it was found out whether the hides paid tax; see 4,3,35 hides note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a third of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,51\tab ALBRIGHT [HUSSEY]. Albright Hussey was formerly divided between the Ancient Parish of Shrewsbury St Alkmund and 
Albrighton, a chapelry of the Ancient Parish of Shrewsbury St Mary. It is now in Albrighton parish; see 4,3,71 Albrighton note. It lay in Baschurch Hundred in 1086, later in Pimhill Hundred. The Domesday forms }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Abretone}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Etbretone }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 are variants of the same n
ame (which is the same as Albrighton: 4,3,71) and Siward held both in 1086. One of the holdings seems to be represented in later times by Albright Hussey, one by Harlescott (SJ5015). Only }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Harlauwecote }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
is represented in the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (ii. p. 75b) where 2 hides are held by Margery }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Lacy }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 of the fee of John Fitz Alan; but the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Pimhill Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (p. 120) includes not only these 2 hides (at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Harliscote }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 held by John Hussey), but 1 hide held by the same man in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Adbrighton}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 962, 970; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 230, 235; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, x. p. 80.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par \tab \tab }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 With Albrighton (4,3,71), and Albrightlee (3g,7) Albright Hussey (4,3,51;57) had probably once formed a single land-unit: Bassett, 'Anglo-Saxon Shrewsbury and its Churches', p. 9.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 
The battle of Shrewsbury (1403) was commemorated by the foundation of a collegiate church by the rector of Albright Hussey. The church replaced the chapel of Albright Hussey and became the centre of the Ancient Parish of Battlefield; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 32.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a third of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab VALUE ... 15s. There is a small dot after }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 solid' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
in the manuscript which is not reproduced in the Ordnance Survey facsimile, but is just visible in the Alecto facsimile. See 3f,7 plough note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,52\tab [LITTLE] NESS. This was a chapelry and township of Baschurch Ancient Parish, and since 1866 has been a di
stinct Civil Parish. It was in Baschurch Hundred in 1086, later in Pimhill Hundred. Little Ness was kept by the Fitz Alans in demesne. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 76a, records John Fitz Alan holding 3 hides in 
}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Nesse }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from the king in chief; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Pimhill Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 119; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 215; Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 101; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 221. Various parts of the manor including Adcote (SJ4119) were given to Haughmond Abbey: the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, nos. 8-14); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, vi. pp. 113-14. The tithes of Ness and Shrawardine were given by Reginald and Hugh son of Warin to Shrewsbury Abbey soon after 1086: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. 7, 8, 33, 38, 41, etc.).
\par \tab \tab The main scribe of Great Domesday failed to rubricate}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  NESSE}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; for other such failures, see 4,3,8 St Peter note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 3 HIDES [***]. See 4,3,35 hides note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab MILL AT 20s AND 600 EELS. The eels came from the mill-pond. Eels are a common render from mills men
tioned in Domesday. They are recorded in Shropshire also at 4,11,2 and, again combined with a money render, at 6,11 and 4,19,2. At the latter they are linked with 2 fisheries, so the eels may have come from there; see also OXF 7,32;37 'From a mill and a f
ishery 15s 6d and 175 eels'. See 1,7 mill note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab This mill may have been at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Muleford }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Milford SJ4120); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 260b; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 215; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 91.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,53\tab MYDDLE. This was an Ancient Parish. The place lay in Baschurch Hundred in 1086, later in Pimhill Hundred. The core of the manor, consisting of 5 hides, was held in the thirteenth century by Lestrange under Fitz Alan. In }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 75a, John }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Extraneus }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds 5 hides in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Mudle }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
from the fee of John Fitz Alan, with service at Oswestry; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Pimhill Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 120; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 230, 235; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. no. 264. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 971, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Mudle }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is held with }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Excalewe }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Childs Ercall: 4,3,23) of the Fitz Alan barony.\tab 
\par \tab \tab A further 1 \'bd hides of the vill were at Balderton (SJ4823) and Sleap Parva (SJ4826, in Wem; see 4,14,26 Sleap note) held directly from John Fitz Alan by the Hussey family (on whom, see 4,3,51 Albright note). In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 75b, Henry }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hesee }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds 1 hide in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Baldreton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and \'bd hide in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Sclepe}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,
}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 a fee of Thomas }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hesee}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , with service at Oswestry (see the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Pimhill Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 120). The remainder of the Domesday vill was progressively given to churches, including \'bd virgate of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Webblescowe }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(Webscott SJ4722) to Haughmond Abbey by John Lestrange and 1 virgate to the church of Lilleshall by the same man: the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, nos. 139-40, 164, 772, 778, 1287-88); Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 65.
\par \tab \tab The church and tithes of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Mutla }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 had already been given to Shrewsbury Abbey by Warin the sheriff, or Hugh his son, before 1086: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. 6, 33, 38, 41, 298); }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 247b.
\par \tab \tab The main scribe of Great Domesday failed to rubricate}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  MULLEHT}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; for other such failures, see 4,3,8 St Peter note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 8 HIDES [***]. See 4,3,35 hides note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,54\tab WELSHAMPTON. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Baschurch Hundred in 1086, later in Pimhill Hundred. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 75a, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hauton'}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , 2 \'bd hides, is held by Thomas }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Roshale }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (named from Rossall: 4,3,56) from the fee of John Fitz Alan, while in the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Pimhill Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 120, Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Extraneus }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hampton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from John Fitz Alan; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 92.
\par \tab \tab One hide at Broom had apparently been removed from this manor and was the subject of a dispute among Earl Roger's men: 4,26,2.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ALDGYTH <OF WELSHAMPTON>. See 4,3,49 Aldgyth note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 3 HIDES [***]. See 4,3,35 hides note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ALBERT [* GRELLEY *]. See 4,3,5 Albert note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a quarter of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,55\tab YEATON. It lay in Baschurch Ancient Parish, and was in Baschurch Hundred in 1086, later in Pimhill Hundred. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Aitone }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 was considered by Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 86, to be The Isle, but left unidentified}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 323 (see note 44). In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 75b, Rossall (4,3,56 Rossall note) is counted as 3 hides}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 which seems to represent the combined total of Rossall and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Aitone }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 which have the same 1086 holders; moreover, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Eton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is a member of Rossall in the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Pimhill Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 120, and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Rosshale}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Eton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Yakedon }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ('Yagdons': 4,27,28) appear together in an Inquisition of Thomas }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Rossall }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. no. 243). Eyton himself may have thought that }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Aitone }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 was from Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Eg-tun }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ('}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 tun }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 on an island'), which is the root of so
me places called 'Eyton' (such as Eyton upon Severn, and Eyton-upon-the-Weald-Moors) and thus identified it with The Isle which is close to Rossall. But }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Aitone }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is from Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Ea tun}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  ('}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 tun }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 on the river [Perry]'). The derivation of Yeaton from }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Aitone }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is accepted by Ekwall, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Dictionary of English Place-Names}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , and by }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Place-names of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 333. The identification seems to have been first proposed by Mr Humphrey Sandford and reported in the edition of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lay Subsidy Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  (1327)}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Pimhill Hundred}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 76.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ALBERT [* GRELLEY *]. See 4,3,5 Albert note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 2 HIDES. [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a gap suitable for about four letters after }{\i\f703\cf1\insrsid4139880 ii hid\'ea.}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 see 1,5 hide note.}
{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab AND 3 SMALLHOLDERS. In the manuscript there is a pale ink smudge to the right of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 7 }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and in the Ordnance Survey facsimile the number of smallholders could be taken as }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 vii}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 though in fact it is clearly }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 iii }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in the manuscript, as it is in the Alecto facsimile.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,56\tab ROSSALL. This was formerly in the Ancient Parish of Sh
rewsbury St Chad. It is now in Bicton which itself was a township and chapelry of the Ancient Parish of Shrewsbury St Chad and is now a separate Civil Parish and Ecclesiastical Parish. It lay in Baschurch Hundred in 1086 and later, as expected, in Pimhill
 Hundred, being held under the Fitz Alan barony by a family named from the place. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 962, 970, Thomas }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Roshale }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Roshale }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 with appurtenances from Fitz Alan; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 231, 235; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lay Subsidy Roll (1334)}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 251. A member is named as }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Eton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Yeaton: 4,3,55 Yeaton note) in the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Pimhill Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 120, and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Roshale}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 a fee of John Fitz Alan with service at Oswestry, is said to be 3 hides in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 75b. This suggests that Yeaton (2 hides) and Rossall were 
combined into a single manor after 1086; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 86.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ALBERT [* GRELLEY *]. See 4,3,5 Albert note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab HUNNING <OF LAWLEY>. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hunni }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 here, and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Huninc}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Huning}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Hunnit}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Hunni}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Hunnith}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Hunnic }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Huni }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
elsewhere in Domesday Shropshire, represent Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hunning}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 see von Feilitzen, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 296, for the reasons for the varying forms. Compare 4,17,1 Bruning note and 4,18,1 Dunning note on the Domesday forms of these names.
\par \tab \tab The name Hunning is rare and all the Shropshire occurrences (4,3,56. 4,4,1-2. 4,19,6;9-11. 4,20,15-16. 4,26,4. 4,27,8;27. 6,7) probably refer to the same individual. His large }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 T.R.E. }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
holding (some with his brother Wulfgeat) had been much reduced by 1086; see Williams, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 The English and the Norman Conquest}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 90; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 276.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 HIDE. [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a gap suitable for about four letters after }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 i hida.}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 see 1,5 hide note.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a third of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,57\tab ALBRIGHT [HUSSEY]. See 4,3,51 Albright note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab HERBERT [* THE LATINIST *]. This man was probably Herbert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 grammaticus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , one of the three principal clerks of Earl Roger: Orderic Vitalis, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Ecclesiastical History }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Chibnall, ii. p. 262); Mason, 'Officers and Clerks', p. 253; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 250.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 2 HIDES [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a gap suitable for about five letters after }{\i\f703\cf1\insrsid4139880 ii hid\'ea}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
see 1,5 hide note. The number seems to have been corrected from }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 i }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 to }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 ii}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , probably immediately; he interlined }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 e }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (for }
{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 du}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 a}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 e}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ) to emphasize this.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a third of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,58\tab HADNALL. This was a chapelry of Myddle Ancient Parish and is now a Civil Parish. In 1086 it lay in Baschurch Hundred; later it was in Pimhill Hundred. In the thirteenth century it was held by the}{\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bannister family under Fitz Alan: in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 75b, William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Banastre }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds 4 hides in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hadenhal' }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 of the fee of John Fitz Alan, with service at Oswestry; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hadenhale Parva }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is held by William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Banastre }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 230. Hadnall contained several members which }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 970, gives as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hadenhal'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Hauston' }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Haston SJ5120), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Swetton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Shotton SJ4922) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Smethecot }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Smethcote SJ5020); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 962; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 235. It also contained }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Herdewyke }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(Hardwicke Grange SJ5121) which was given with another part of Hadnall to Haughmond Abbey: the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, nos. 7, 21, 34, 211, 308, 351-52, 354-55, 358-59, 361-62, 365-408, 515, 520, 528-36, 658, 685, 1071-73, 1101, appendix A. i.); }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 260b; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 iii. pp. 192, 193; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 44.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab GODWIN HELD IT. This was written by the main scribe of Great Domesday over an erasure; there is an erased memo in the outer margin next to it. On these marginal notes, see C6 accident note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining half a line after the woodland detail, perhaps for the later insertion of other resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,59\tab ACTON [REYNALD]. This place lay in Shawbury Ancient Parish. Acton was in Baschurch Hundred in 1086, later in Pimhill Hundred. The affix appears to derive
 from a family surnamed de Acton, three of whom had the forename Reyner. The early forms rule out a connection with Reginald of Bailleul, the 1086 holder; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 5. In }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii.p. 75a, Thomas }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bot'el }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds 3 hides in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Acton Reyn' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
of the fee of John Fitz Alan, with service at Oswestry. The }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Pimhill Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 (p. 120) more accurately describes it as held by de Acton under de Stanton (from Stanton-upon-Hine-Heath: 4,3,3) under Fitz Alan: Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Acton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Acton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 as
 a fee of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Staunton}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 with service at Oswestry. In later times at least Acton contained }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Grineleshul' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(part of Grinshill SJ5223; see 4,16,1 Grinshill note) according to the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 962, 970: see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 260b; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 192; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 231, 235; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 61.
\par \tab \tab Land at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Actune }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 was left to Burton Abbey }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 . 1003 in the will of Wulfric Spot: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Early Charters of the West Midlands}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 149 no. 144 (= Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , no. 1536). The county in which }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Actune }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
lay, and its exact identity, are uncertain, although the partially geographical arrangement of the will suggests that the place lay in Shropshire. In none of the three Actons in Shropshire that were Domesday manors is ther
e any trace of any connection with Burton Abbey:}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Charters of Burton Abbey}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. xxxi and no. 29. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Early Charters of the West Midlands }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
does not mention the possibility that thi}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 s Actune }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 was Acton Reynald, but the identification is no more of less likely than with the other Actons in Shropshire.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab RICHARD [* THE BUTLER *]. He is probably Reginald's butler: 4,1,5 Richard note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining quarter of a line after the woodland detail, perhaps for the later insertion of another resource; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,60\tab ASTON [EYRE]. This was a formerly a chapelry and township of Morville Ancient Parish. In 1086 it was in "Alnodestreu" Hundred, later in Stottesdon Hundred. The overlordship went to Fit
z Alan while descent from Alchere was to Fitz Ayer as at 4,3,4;65. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 82b, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 John filius Cleri }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (i.e. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Aeri}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds 2 hides in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Whetene Aston }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (presumably a confusion of two Astons since Wheaton Aston is in Staffordshire) from John Fitz Alan; it is }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Aston Aer }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv.}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 p. 218. See }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 963, 971; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 231, 242; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 115, v. no. 470,}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ix. no. 459; Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 199.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ALCHERE <OF LE PIN>. See 4,3,4 Alchere note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab SAXI. }{\insrsid4139880 The Domesday forms of this name - }{\i\insrsid4139880 Saxi}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Sexi}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Saxo}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Sexi}{
\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\insrsid4139880 us}{\insrsid4139880 ], }{\i\insrsid4139880 Sessi}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Sacxe}{\insrsid4139880 , with the oblique forms}{\i\insrsid4139880  Saxa}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Saxae}{
\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Saxo}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Saxonis}{\insrsid4139880  - represent Old Norse/Old Danish }{\i\insrsid4139880 Saxi}{\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Na
mes of Domesday Book}{\insrsid4139880 , p. 352. The Alecto edition has Saxi.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining quarter of a line after the mill detail, perhaps for the later insertion of the woodland or another resource; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,61\tab EUDON [BURNELL]. This holding was at Eudon Burnell which like Eudon George (4,11,5) lay in Chetton Ancient Parish. It lay in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086, later in Stottesdon Hundred. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 81b, Auger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Eudon' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds \'bd hide from John Fitz Alan in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Eudon' Maleseveres}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 217, the holder of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Eudon }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is Hugh }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Burnel}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 962, 971; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 242; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, v. no. 611; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 185; Purton, 'Manors of Eudon Burnell and Eudon George'.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The small hidage given in 1255 by comparison with 2 hides in Domesday may in part be accounted for by the removal of Criddon (SO6691). This is the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Breddon' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 of }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 82a, and the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Criddone }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 held by Alina, daughter of Ayer, in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 232; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 962, 971; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 242; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 191.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ALWARD [* SON OF ALMUND *]. He was apparently the son of Almund: see 4,27,17 Almund note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 2 HIDES. The parchment of the manuscript is yellow and transparent here, though the words}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 are clear; in the Ordnance Survey facsimile the hidage is very blurred and 
in the Alecto facsimile the second minim of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 ii}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  resembles an }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 l}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab WOODLAND, 60 PIGS. The main scribe of Great Domesday added this detail in the space he normally left between the resources and the value, but it proved too small and he had to interline part of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 porc'}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880  after erasing the top of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 V}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Valuit}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  to make room for it. He had jotted down in the outer margin what he had to add: }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 silu \'85 porc' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 can just be made out, though erased. It is not reproduced in the Ordnance Survey facsimile, though a small part of
 it is visible in the Alecto facsimile; Farley did not print it of course. On these marginal notes, see C6 accident note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab THE VALUE WAS. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Valuit}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , although the top of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 V}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  was erased (see 4,3,61 woodland note);}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 Farley misprinted }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 valuit}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 40s. This was corrected by the main scribe of Great Domesday.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,62\tab HATTON?. The Domesday form is }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Etone. }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 A second entry for }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Etone }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
is 4,23,17 which was likewise held before 1066 by Thorgot who also held Cosford and Bishton close by (4,11,10. 4,25,7). The e
vidence is in favour of the Domesday vill's being Hatton, now in Shifnal Ancient Parish; thus an aspirate appears to be missing from its form here: Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hetune }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (4,3,2) becomes (High) Hatton. }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Etone }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 was in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086 and Hatton was later in Brimstree Hundred, its expected successor; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 145.
\par \tab \tab The present entry is incomplete, but although it was probably part of the same }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Etone}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
it is unlikely to be a duplicate entry, since the later extent of Hatton is 1 hide, made up of these two holdings of \'bd
 hide. Even so, this present entry may be entered in the wrong fief in Domesday, there being no later trace of a Fitz Alan holding in Hatton.
\par \tab \tab Both halves went successively to Buildwas Abbey. One half of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hettune }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 was given by Adam }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Hetune }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and Reginald his son: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 359 no. xvi. The other half (probably the holding of 4,23,17) is represented in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 147, by }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hatton}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,
}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 an escheat of Gerard }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Thorny }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (4,23 Gerard note) held by Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Trainell'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
: the Red Book of the Exchequer (Hall, ii. p. 453). This was held by serjeanty with service at Shrawardine (4,3,50). In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 383 (see also p. 346), Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Traynel }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds \'bd hide in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Henton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (i.e. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Heton') }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in Brimstree Hundred. This portion of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hatton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
also went to Buildwas Abbey (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 358 no. xiii) which was holding the whole manor }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 of Hatton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 at the Dissolution; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 260; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 191. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 1285 the Abbot of Buildwas holds 2 carucates in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Soldehatton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (presumably a confusion with Cold Hatton: 4,23,8). On the whole manor, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 167.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [VALUE ***]. See 4,3,62 Hatton note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,63\tab UPTON [CRESSETT]. The Domesday form is }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Vltone. }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 If this is an error for }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Vptone }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
this place was probably Upton Cressett, which was an Ancient Parish; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 296. It lay in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086, later in Stottesdon Hundred. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 82b, Thomas }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Upton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds 3 \'bd hides in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Upton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from John Fitz Alan. It is }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Opton'}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880  in}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 962, 971, and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 242, and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hopton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 217, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Upton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 231: see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire
}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 138.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ALMUND [* FATHER OF ALWARD *]. See 4,3,45 Almund note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 FREE PLOUGHMAN. See 1,8 ploughmen note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining quarter of a line after the woodland detail, perhaps for the later insertion of another resource; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,64\tab 
GLAZELEY. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086, later in Stottesdon Hundred. The overlordship went to the Fitz Alans and under them Lestrange was successor to Azo [* Bigot *] as in the cases of Abdon, Berrington and Longnor 
(4,3,7;14-15). In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 81b, Alan }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Perepunt }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds 1 hide from John }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Extraneus }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Glazeley}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 218, 231. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, vi. no. 113, it is held of the manor of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Ruytone }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Ruyton-Eleven-Towns: 4,18,2) which belongs to John }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lestraunge }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 of Knockin (4,3,43 Osbaston note). See Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 210.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab AZO [* BIGOT *]. See 4,3,7 Azo note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ALWARD [* SON OF ALMUND *]. He was apparently the son of Almund; see 4,27,17 Almund note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining third of a line after the mill detail, perhaps for the later insertion of the woodland or another resource; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,65\tab MIDDLETON [SCRIVEN]. This was an A
ncient Parish. It lay in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086, later in Stottesdon Hundred. The 1086 division continues into later times, Alchere's portion going to Fitz Ayer and Albert's to de Rossall. Thus in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 81b, Geoffrey }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Breddon' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and Hamo }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Middelton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 hold 2 hides in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Middelton'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Geoffrey holding 1 hide from John }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 filius Cleri }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (i.e. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Aeri) }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and Hamo 1 hide from Thomas }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
de Rossale}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 218, 231; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 194.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ALCHERE <OF LE PIN>. See 4,3,4 Alchere note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ALBERT [* GRELLEY *]. See 4,3,5 Albert note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank half a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab THEY WERE WASTE. Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 wasta fuer}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 unt}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ];}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
it is not absolutely clear to what the plural refers, though it is most likely to be the two manors that existed before 1066, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 wasta }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 agreeing with an understood }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 maneria. }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 In 4,3,38 in an almost identical phrase it refers to the preceding manor, but a }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  value for 4,3,64 has already been given, so this is unlikely. In 4,5,2 }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
wastae ...}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 fuer}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 unt}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
refers to the 2 hides there and this could be the meaning here and the scribe could merely have written }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 wasta }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 for }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 wastae}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,66\tab ASTON [BOTTERELL]. This was an Ancient Parish. The place was in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086, later in Stottesdon. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 82b, Thomas }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Boterell' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds 3 hides in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Aston Boterell' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from John Fitz Alan; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 108a; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 962, 971; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 231, 242; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 222. In }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 218, the members of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Haston }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 are given as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Necton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Norton?; see 4,3,69), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Forde }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (The Ford SO6584), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Heywode }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Heywood SO6282) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Toteneye }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (unidentified). The additional 2 hides in the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  total are probably accounted for by Norton (4,3,69) which merged with Aston.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,67\tab 'FOUSWARDINE'. This is now an abandoned site in Sidbury Civil Parish, the success
or to the Ancient Parish of that name. It lay in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086, later in Stottesdon Hundred, being held by the Constantine family under Fitz Alan: in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 82a, Roger }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Costentin }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is the holder of \'bd}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 hide in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Fuleswrth }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from Thomas }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Costentin}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 218; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 137. The place survived to be recorded on nineteenth-century maps. It is 'Fouswardine' on the first edition Ordnance Survey map (sheet 61 of 1833, reprint sheet 41 of 1970); 'Fouswardine Coppice' on the 6-inch map (no. 66 NW) of 1891.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab RALPH [* OF COSTENTIN *]. According to Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 345, all his holdings passed to the de Costentin family; they are named from the Cotentin peninsular in Normandy. On the descents of his holdings here, see 4,3,67 'Fouswardine' note, 4,3,68 Oldbury note and 4,6,3 Petton note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ALMUND [*FATHER OF ALWARD *]. See 4,3,45 Almund note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,68\tab OLDBURY. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086, later in Stottesdon Hundred. As at 'Fouswardine' (4,3,67) and at Eaton Constantine (4,3,21) descent was from Ralph to de Constantine. In }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 82b, Thomas }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Costentyn }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds l \'bd hides in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Aldebyr' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from John Fitz Alan; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 231, 242; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. no. 102; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 131; Purton, 'Manor of Oldbury'.
\par \tab \tab It is possible that the borough of Bridgnorth was contructed partly on the land of Oldbury, though it was more likely built on Earl Roger's lordship land of Morville (by his son Robert). A Danish and an English }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 burh}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880  were built at Bridgnorth in the late ninth and early tenth centuries, but there is no evidence to connect them with the fortification that named Oldbury, though the matter needs investigation; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 226; and 4,1,5 Morville note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab RALPH [* OF COSTENTIN *]. See 4,3,67 Ralph note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ALWARD [* SON OF ALMUND *]. He was apparently the son of Almund; see 4,27,17 Almund note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,69\tab NORTON. It was in the Ancient Parish of Aston Botterell and it lay in 'Conditre' Hundred in 1086, later in Stottesdon Hundred. The 2 hides of Norton probably merged with Aston to produce a 3-hide manor: 4,3,66 Aston note.}
{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab THORTH [* OF WROXETER *]. On his name, see 4,3,14 Thorth note and, on his possible identification, see 4,3,26 Thorth note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,70\tab DETTON. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Dodintone }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 probably the place that lay in the Ancient Parish of 
Neen Savage. If so, it was in 'Conditre' Hundred in 1086, later in Stottesdon Hundred. It is held in the thirteenth century under Fitz Alan by a family named from the place. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 8lb, Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Pynelesdon}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ', guardian of the son and heir of John }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Dodyton'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds 1 hide in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Dodyton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from John Fitz Alan; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 962, 971; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 217, 231, 242; Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 281.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The identification is probable but not certain, since insufficient forms of the name have been found to trace the evolution of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Dodintone }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
to Detton when it might have been expected to yield Dod(d)ington or Ditton; see Ditton Priors (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Dodintone}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,1,26 and Earls Ditton (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Dodentone}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 6,4 and 7,2, and Dodington (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Dodetune}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,7,4. A
 possible identification might be Doddington (SO6176) now a parish, but formerly a detached part of Cleobury Mortimer. Against this it can be urged (1) that, whereas Detton was in 'Conditre' Hundred in 1086, all the places adjacent to Doddington - Coreley
, Hints, Cleeton St Mary - lying west of the Mill Brook, were in 'Overs' Hundred (the enlarged successor to the Domesday 'Overs' Hundred in the Middle Ages); (2) Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Dodinton}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 whose family holds this manor of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Dodyton/Dodynton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in the thirteenth century occupied land in Bardley (SO6980) which is close to Detton: Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 179, 183. The identification with Detton is accepted by the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 106: the first citation of the form }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Detton}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880  is from 1576.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ALWARD [* SON OF ALMUND *]. He was apparently the son of Almund; see 4,27,17 Almund note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab AS 2 MANORS. This was interlined by the main scribe of Great Domesday, the descender of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 p}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  acting as an insertion sign.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank three-quarters of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,3,71\tab THIS ENTRY was a later addition by the main scribe of Great Domesday in the space he had left at the en
d of this sub-chapter; he used a different pen and a paler ink to the preceding entries. He had probably originally omitted this entry for land in Baschurch Hundred (which he had already listed on folio 255a,b: 4,3,49-59) because he was unsure where to pl
a
ce it, as it lacked a 1086 tenant. He no doubt found the entry during a check and decided to include it here because of its link with Reginald through his predecessor Warin, though it should really have been put with Shrewsbury Abbey's lands on folio 252c
 (see 4,3,71 Albrighton note).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ALCHERE <OF LE PIN>. See 4,3,4 Alchere note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ALBRIGHTON. This estate was formerly a chapelry of the Ancient Parish of Shrewsbury St Mary and was once called Monks Albrighton. It is now a Civil Parish. It lay in Baschurch Hun
dred in 1086, later in Pimhill Hundred. There is no mention in the entry, which was a late addition (see 4,3,71 entry note, of a 1086 holder. It had in fact already been given to Shrewsbury Abbey by Alchere: Henry I's confirmation says }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Alherius }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ... }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Eadburtonam}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, p. 33; see pp. xiv, xix, 6, 38, 41 etc.). It should thus have been included on folio 252c with other of the abbey's holdings. The abbey continued to hold it: in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 76a, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Albrichton' Monacorum Salop'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 2 hides, is held by the Abbot of Shrewsbury; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Pimhill Hundred Roll}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 120; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 iii. pp. 189-90; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. pp. 297, 324 note 46; Eyton, 
}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 107. Albrighton manor probably included 1 hide in Leaton: 4,27,27 Leaton note; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 211.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab With Albright Hussey (4,3,51;57) and Albrightlee (3g,7) Albrighton had probably once formed a single land-unit: Bassett, 'Anglo-Saxon Shrewsbury and its Churches', p. 9.
\par \tab \tab On the succession of holders, see also Fleming, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday Book and the Law}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 225 no. 1327.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab WARIN [* THE SHERIFF *]. He was Warin the bald; see 4,3,8 predecessor note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a quarter of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of a resource; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,4\tab THE MAIN SCRIBE of Great Domesday originally wrote }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 TE }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (the beginning of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 TERRA}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ) in vermilion}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 level with the hundred head (though in larger capitals than it): he presumably momentarily forgot that this was not an ordinary chapter but a subsection of chapter 4. Although he erased it, it is still visible in the manu
script, but is not reproduced in the Ordnance Survey facsimile and is not visible in the Alecto facsimile.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ROGER SON OF CORBET. Corbet and his sons Roger (4,4) and Robert (4,5) were among several men given positions of authority in Shropshire by Earl Roger; see Orderic Vitalis, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Ecclesiastical History }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Chibnall, ii. pp. 220-21), but see Mason, 'Officers and Clerks',}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 p. 247. They may have originated from the region of Boitron and Essay near S\'e9es (both in the French d\'e9
partement of Orne (arrondissement Alen\'e7on, canton M\'eale-sur-Sarthe); see Keats-Rohan, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\insrsid4139880 , p. 373. }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Corbet seems to have been given lands on the border with a view to standing against or conquering the Welsh and Roger and Robert divided these. Most of Roger's lands lay in "Reweset" Hund
red and were subsequently drawn into the Corbet Welshries of Upper and Lower Gorddwr; see the map in Morgan, 'Trewern in Gorddwr', p. 125; and \{Introduction: History\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab In addition to these lands the Corbets later held Minsterley, Trewern and Alberbury (4,1,7-9) and English and Welsh lands attached to Montgomery (4,1,15;35-36). They also had their own 'forest', that of }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Steyfrestones }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Stiperstones SO3698 etc.): }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 600. The Domesday lands reappear in a number of In
quisitions of the Corbet family: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 85, iii. nos. 600, 635, vi. no. 318, ix. no. 50.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Roger's lands continued in the Corbet family, although the detailed descent is problematical: Sanders, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 English Baronies}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 29; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Domesday People}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 400). They formed the barony of Cause, named from the castle that lies now in Westbury parish, although the land on which it was built was probably one of the unnamed outliers of Worthen (4,4,20) in 1086. Roger's younger 
brother Robert holds the adjacent fief in Domesday. In other counties (see DEV 19. and (probably) DEV 24 and DEV 25) villages are regularly divided between brothers and this is true here of Marsh (4,4,17 and 4,5,10) and Rorrington (4,4,21 and 4,5,12). The
 
hundreds, where they correspond, are listed in the same order within each fief. It is possible that the brothers shared a single chapter in the volume for this circuit as did Walter of Claville and Gotshelm (possibly his brother) in Exon, corresponding to
 DEV 24-25.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab The hundredal order of this sub-chapter is as follows (the bracketed numbers are explained in SHR 4 arrangement note):
\par \tab \tab 4,4,1-3 Condover Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,4,4 "Rinlau" Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,4,5-19 "Reweset" Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,4,20-22 Wittery Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,4,23-24 Baschurch Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,4,25 Wrockwardine Hundred
\par \tab The final entry is out of sequence, but in fact 4,4,23-25 probably do not belong to Roger son of Corbet: 4,4,23 Roger note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,4,1\tab WELBATCH. It was formerly in the Ancient Parish of Shrewsbury St Chad and is now 
in Annscroft ecclesiastical parish. It lay in Condover Hundred in 1086 and later. It seems to have continued in the hands of the Fitz Corbets, although }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 973, wrongly states that Odo }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Hodenet }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Welbach'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  from the barony of Hugh }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Kylpec'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
i.e. from the barony of Pulverbatch (4,26 Roger note). }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wulbech }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is 1 hide, held by Odo }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Hodenet }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from Fulk }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 filius Warini }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 62b; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 532, vi. no. 52, x. no. 115; Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 119. On the connection with St Chad's of Shrewsbury, see SHR 3f St Chad's note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab RANULF [* PEVEREL *]. See Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 356 (JP).}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab HUNNING <OF LAWLEY>. See 4,3,56 Hunning note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 
MILL ... NOT IN SUMMER. Translated literally, the Latin is 'a winter mill, not a summer one'. The Alecto edition has 'a mill for winter, not for summer, use'. The small stream that passes Welbatch and is a tributary of the Rea Brook (formerly the Meole Br
ook) may only have produced a sufficient flow in winter; see 1,7 mill note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining half a line after the mill detail, perhaps for the later insertion of the woodland or other resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,4,2\tab STAPLETON?. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hundeslit}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 another part of which, held by Alward, is found at 4,27,9. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hundeslit}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880  appears to mean 'Hund's portion of the area called }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hlid}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ', that is Lyth Hill in Condover: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 278.
\par \tab \tab The identification with Stapleton, an Ancient Parish, first made by Eyton (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, vi. p. 108), appears reasonable but is not without difficulty: the cause and date of the change of name are not clear and there is no subsequent 
Fitz Corbet interest in Stapleton. Roger's portion seems early to have been combined with Alward's and to have descended - like Cothercott and Smethcott (4,27,8;15) - to the honour of Montgomery, being held by the Cantilupe family, then by Eudes }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 La Zouche }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from his wife Millicent, then by the Mortimers, the Earls of March. The later manor of Stapleton seems to have been composed of the two parts of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hundeslit }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
together with Netley (4,28,2). In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 62b, John }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Stepelton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stepelton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
of the fee of William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Canteloy}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 966, Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Meysi }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds one-fifth fee in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stepelton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Cantilupo }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 215, Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Stepelton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds from Millicent }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 La Such}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 230, 239; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ix. no. 439, ii. no. 17; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 324 note 47, viii. p. 164; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 278. Stapleton lay in Condover Hundred in 1086 and later.
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 main scribe of Great Domesday initially omitted }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hundeslit}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 and had to interline it, probably at an early stage as the pen and ink are the same as in the text below.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab RANULF [* PEVEREL *]. See 4,4,1 Ranulf note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab THEY PAY TAX. That is, the 1 \'bd virgates; compare 4,4,4. However, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 7}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 geld' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 could be translated}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
'It pays', referring to the manor, though the meaning is the same in either case. Compare 4,18,3 pays note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab HUNNING <OF LAWLEY>. See 4,3,56 Hunning note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a quarter of a line after the villager, probably for the later insertion of a resource; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,4,3\tab ACTON [BURNELL]. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Condover Hundred in 1086 and later.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Land at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Actune }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 was left to Burton Abbey }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 . 1003 in the will of Wulfric Spot: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Early Charters of the West Midlands}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 149 no. 144 (= Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, no. 1536). The county in which Actune lay, and its exact identity, are uncertain although the partially geographical arrangement of the will suggests that the place lay in Shropshire. In none of the three Actons in Shropshire that were Domesday manors i
s there any trace of any connection with Burton Abbey: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Charters of Burton Abbey}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. xxxi and no. 29.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The manor descended in the barony of Corbet of Cause, being held from the late twelfth century by a family called Burnel. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 62b, Roger }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Burnel }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and Hugh }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Becbur' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 hold 3 hides in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Acton Burnel}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
a fee of Thomas Corbet; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 973 (where it is wrongly ascribed to the barony of Hugh }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Kylpec}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 : 4,4,1 Welbatch note); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 964; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 229, 240; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, i. no. 827, iii. no. 194, viii. no. 667, ix. no. 50; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 121; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 7; and 4,3,16 Cound note.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,4,4\tab WENTNOR. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in "Rinlau" Hundred in 1086, later in Purslow Hundred. The main manor continued in the family of the Corbets, lords of Cause. Thus in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 77a, Thomas Corbet holds \'bd hide of the fee of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Cawes }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wontenour}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 233; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 1283; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, ii. no. 85, iii. no. 600, ix. no. 50. But the hidage of the manor was reduced from 2 \'bd hides in 1086 to}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \'bd
 hide in 1255 by a series of grants to churches. Thus the church, the tithes and 1 virgate went to Shrewsbury Abbey (the Shrewsbury Cartulary: Rees, pp. 7, 8, 34, 39, 42, 44, etc; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 167a), but the mill of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wontenov'e }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 went to the Abbey of Buildwas (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 163a). The mill of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Ricton }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Ritton SO3497) also went to Buildwas (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 260b; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 191) together with 1 \'bd hides in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Kim'iton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Kinnerton SO3796; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 77a), held from the Corbets of Wattlesborough under the Corbets of Cause. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Modlicot' }
{\cf1\insrsid4139880 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Medlycote }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Medlicott SO4094) was given to Haughmond Abbey: the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, nos. 742-55); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 77a; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 233; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 181.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a space suitable for about ten letters between the details of the population and the hedged enclosures, possibly for the later inclusion of woodland or another resource; see \{
Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,4,5\tab WINSLEY. It lay in Westbury Ancient Parish. It was in "Reweset" Hundred in 1086, later in Ford Hundred. The manor was given to Shrewsbury Abbey by Roger Fitz Corbet between 1121 and 1135, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wynesleg' }
{\cf1\insrsid4139880 being held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 66b, of the fee of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Caures }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 by the Abbot of Shrewsbury: the Shrewsbury Cartulary 
(Rees, pp. xix, 42, 44, 56, 57, etc. and no. 288}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 p. 272); Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 63; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, viii. p. 314.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a space suitable for about seven letters after the population, rather small for the later insertion of any resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,4,6\tab IN THAT HUNDRED. That is, in "Reweset" Hundred. The heading is above 4,4,5. The main scribe of Great Domesday often supplied an indication of the hundred in which an unnamed place lay.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \'bd HIDE. This unnamed holding, lying in "Reweset" Hundred in 1086, was probably that which was afterwards known as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 La Ree}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 In }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 66b, Ralph }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Ree }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds \'bd hide in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Ree }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from Thomas }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Corbet }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 of Cause; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 964, 972; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 241; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 260a. The name is derived from the Rea Brook. The precise settlement has not been identified, its last record as a manor being in 1346 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 241), but there is a place now called Reabrook at SO3604 in Minsterley parish; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 116; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, viii. p. 315. It may be significant that this \'bd hide, joined to the 14 \'bd hides of Worthen (4,4,20), would make a 15-hide unit.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,4,7\tab WOLLASTON. This was a chapelry of Alberbury Ancient Parish which was later united with Cardeston Ancient Parish. It is now a separate Civil Parish.
 Wollaston was in "Reweset" Hundred in 1086, later in Ford Hundred. Wollaston continued to be held by the Corbets of Cause and seems to have been in two parts, 'Great' and 'Little' Wollaston. This entry probably represents 'Little Wollaston' \'bd}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 hide, held as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Willaneston Parva }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 of the barony of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Caus }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 66b (Ford Hundred). 'Great Wollaston' held by Picot's successors under the Corbets may have been part of Trewern (4,1,8) in 1086; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 163a; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 964, 971; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 235, 241; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 67a; Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 113; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 202.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab HOWEVER, IT PAYS 12d. This may mean that Wollaston was being 'farmed'; compare the value statement of the
 next entry where Bausley is worth 2s, but is being 'farmed' for 6s 8d. See 1,4 value note and 3d,5 revenue note and the similar statement in 3f,2. It is interesting that four manors held by Earl Roger in Sussex (SUS 11,1;3;6-7) and two in Hampshire (HAM 
21,1;6) had a 1086 value which was exceeded by a 'payment' (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de firma }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in HAM 21,1) and that they were being 'farmed'.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,4,8\tab BAUSLEY. This was formerly a township of the Shropshire Ancient Parish of Alberbury, now in Criggion parish, in Montgomeryshire, in wh
ich county it was placed (in Dethyr Hundred) in 1536 following the dissolution of the Marcher lordship of Nether Gorddwr: \{Introduction: County Boundary\}and \{Introduction: Hundreds\}
. Bausley lay in "Reweset" Hundred in 1086 but was subsequently drawn into the Corbets' Welshry; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. no. 104; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 97; Sandford, 'Bausley', pp. 87-112.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab HOWEVER, IT IS AT A REVENUE FOR 6s 8d. It was being 'farmed' (perhaps by the Welshmen as there are s
everal references in Shropshire to Welshmen paying rent for holdings, for example in 4,3,35-38). On this practice, see 3d,5 revenue note, and compare 3f,2 value note, 4,4,7 pays note and 1,4 value note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,4,9\tab EYTON. It lay in Alberbury Ancient Parish which
 was later united with Cardeston Ancient Parish. In 1086 it lay in "Reweset" Hundred, later in Ford Hundred. Another portion of the vill is 4,27,16. It passed to the lords of Cause, successors of Roger Fitz Corbet and was held under them by a family calle
d Marsh (see 4,4,17 Marche note). In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 66b, Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de M'sse }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds 1 hide in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Eyton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 of}{
\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 the barony of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Caus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 similarly Roger son of Matthew holds \'bd}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 hide there; see 
}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 964, 971; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 241; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ix. no. 50; Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 120; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 200.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 2 SMALLHOLDERS WITH 5 OXEN PLOUGHING. Latin }{\i\f710\cf1\insrsid4139880 .ii. bord' c\'fb .v. bob' arant'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  could perhaps be translated '2 smallholders ploughing/ who plough with 5 oxen', as }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 arant' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 can abbreviate both }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 arantibus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ablative plural after }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 cum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 arantes}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 nominative plural with }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 ii bord' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 as its subject. In 4,3,29 }
{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 arantes }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is written in full and must agree with the oxen in the accusative case. The transla
tion in the Alecto edition is the same as here. The Phillimore printed translation has '2 smallholders with 5 ploughing oxen'.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,4,10\tab LOTON. It lay in Alberbury Ancient Parish which was later united with Cardeston Ancient Parish. It was in "Reweset" Hundre
d in 1086, later in Ford Hundred. From Roger son of Corbet it appears to have passed to his brother Robert and to have followed the same descent as Wattlesborough (4,4,16) and Cardeston (4,4,18), being counted as a member of Wattlesborough manor: in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 66a, Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Corbet }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (of Moreton Corbet) holds 3 hides in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Cardel}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 Wetlesburgh }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lohton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 of the fee of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Caus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, iii. no. 635; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 109; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 198.
\par \tab \tab Lands at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Locheton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 were granted to Shrewsbury Abbey between 1108 and 1121 by Robert Corbet. Both Eyton and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, viii. p. 198 consider the possibility that the lands were at Loton, but Una Rees, editor of the Shrewsbury Cartulary, considers that }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Locheton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
is Loughton, now a parish near Wheathill, formerly in Chetton parish: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. xix, 34, 39, etc.).}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab A HEDGED ENCLOSURE. It is presumably that mentioned in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 96b, as the 'free enclosure of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lochton}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
' held by Thomas Corbet. It is no doubt represented by Hayes (SJ3515). See 3c,2 enclosures note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,4,11\tab YOCKLETON. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 IOCLEHVILE}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; Farley misprinted }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 LOCLEHVILE}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 . For another example of his printing }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 L }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 for }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 I}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  in a place-name, see 4,27,28 'Yagdons' note.
\par \tab \tab Yockleton is now a separate Ecclesiastical Parish, but was formerly a township of Westbury Ancient Parish and remains for civil purposes in its successor, Westbury Civil Parish. It lay in "Reweset" Hundred in 1086, later in Ford Hundred. Th
e Domesday form }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Ioclehuile }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is from Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 geocled }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 iocled}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  ('a small manor') and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 hyll}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880  ('hill'). In the modern form }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 tun }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 has replaced }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 hyll }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 as the termination (first noted in 1316); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 333. Yockleton was held by the Corbets in lordship. It is }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Yokelcul }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 66b, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Yokelthul }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Yokelthull }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, ii. no. 85, iii. no. 600 (of Thomas Corbet and Peter Corbet respectively) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Yekelton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 held by Peter Corbet in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 235; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. no. 318, ix. no. 50; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 50; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 310. Roger son of Corbet granted the tithes to Shrewsbury Abbey: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. 7-8, 11, 34, 39, etc.). A member of Yockleton was }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Le Park }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(Park farm SJ3910): }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 600.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [6] SMALLHOLDERS. In the manuscript the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 v}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 vi}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  is rather faint and might have been erased, though the parchment is shiny and gr
easy here, so the ink may merely not have taken (the fact that the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 i}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  is darker may suggest that the scribe was aware of this, so charged his pen with more ink). In the Alecto facsimile the }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 v}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  has hardly been reproduced, though it is somewhat clearer in the Ordnance Survey facsimile. Farley printed }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 vi}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining third of a line after the woodland detail, perhaps for the later insertion of another resource; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,4,12\tab 
PONTESBURY. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in "Reweset" Hundred in 1086, afterwards in Ford Hundred. Pontesbury itself passed from Roger son of Corbet to the Corbets of Cause. In the thirteenth century it was held by the Fitz Herbert family: in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 972, Herbert son of Peter holds in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Pantebur'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 66b, Reginald son of Peter holds 2 \'bd hides in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Pontesbur'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 241, John }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Chorlton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(the former holder being Rees }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 ap Houwel) }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Pontesbury }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 of the fee of Caus. See }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 606, x. nos. 117, 632; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 234; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 129; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire
}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 264.
\par \tab \tab The manor had a number of members: the 1 \'bd hides that in 1086 did not pay tax may well have been church land at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Estleg' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(Asterley SJ3707) which by 1255 was regarded as a 2-hide vill, 1 hide being held by Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wyscart }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from the Church of St George, Pontesbury: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, ii. pp. 66b, 96a; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 235. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Mathelhurste }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Malehurst SJ3806) lay within the 2 hides (or 2 \'bd}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
hides, see above) that Reginald son of Peter held from the barony of Cause: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 66b. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Horton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
1 hide (Hortonlane SJ4411) in a remote corner of the Ancient Parish also seems to have been a member: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 66b; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 964, 971; }
{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 241; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ix. no. 50; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, vii. p. 137.
\par \tab \tab There was a church here, not mentioned in Domesday; it was probably a Saxon foundation for secular priests; see }{\insrsid4139880 Knowles and Hadcock, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Medieval Religious Houses}{\insrsid4139880 , pp. 417, 435; and }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 \{Introduction: Ecclesiastical Organization\}.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ERNWY <OF PONTESBURY>. }{\insrsid4139880 The Domesday forms of this name - }{\i\insrsid4139880 Ernui}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Ernuin}{\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\insrsid4139880 us}{\insrsid4139880 ), }{\i\insrsid4139880 
Arnui}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Erneuui}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Arnuinus}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Ernu}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Ernuit}{\insrsid4139880  etc. - represent Old English }{
\i\insrsid4139880 Earnwig}{\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\insrsid4139880 , pp. 243-44. JRM preferred Ern- for Old English }{\i\insrsid4139880 Earn-}{\insrsid4139880 
, as it reflected the majority of the Domesday spellings. Von Feilitzen pointed out the frequent confusion between the elements }{\i\insrsid4139880 -wig}{\insrsid4139880  and }{\i\insrsid4139880 -wine}{\insrsid4139880  (in this case }{\i\insrsid4139880 
Earnwig }{\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\insrsid4139880 Earnwine}{\insrsid4139880 ), making it impossible to classify the Domesday forms }{\i\insrsid4139880 Ernui}{\insrsid4139880  and }{\i\insrsid4139880 Ernuin}{\insrsid4139880  correctly: }{\i\insrsid4139880 
ibidem}{\insrsid4139880  and \'a7148. The Alecto edition has Earnwig.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The confusion between the names Ernwy and Ernwin may have occurred here. It is likely that the present }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Ernui}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  and the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Ernuin}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 [}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 us}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ] in Farley (4,4,13) are the same person: both held in 1066 and continued to hold in 1086 from Roger son of Corbet and Farley later became part of Pontesbury (4,4,13 Farley note). It is also possible that the 
}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Ernui }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 who had held Westbury (4,4,15) and two estates that passed to Roger's brother Robert (Oaks: 4,5,4, and Onslow: 4,5,7) and who was still holding Onslow in 1086 was the same
 man. If so, like a number of other Englishmen, he was only able to retain part of his former lands after the Conquest. See Williams, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 The English and the Norman Conquest}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 89.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,4,13\tab FARLEY. It lay in Pontesbury Ancient Parish. It was known as Fairley until the early twentieth century: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 130. Like Pontesbury it lay in "Reweset" Hundred in 1086, later in Ford Hundred. It seems to have had the same 1086 tenant (see 4,4,12 Ernwy note) and appears to have been absorbed by Pontesbury manor (4,4,12) after 1086; see Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 144; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 271.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ERNWIN [* ERNWY* <OF PONTESBURY> *]. See 4,4,12 Ernwy note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,4,14\tab HANWOOD. What is now Hanwood incorporated Great and Little Hanwood. Great H
anwood lay in the Ancient Parish of that name; Little Hanwood was a township of Pontesbury Ancient Parish. The estate lay in "Reweset" Hundred in 1086, later in Ford Hundred. Hanwood descended in the Corbet barony, being held under the lords of Cause by a
 family named from the place. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 66b, Reginald }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Hanewodde }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds 2 hides in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hanewode }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
from the barony of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Caus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 :}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 964, 971; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, iv. pp. 235, 1241; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 117. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hanewode }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is associated with }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wallop }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(Wallop SJ3207), presumably part of Whitton (4,4,19) in 1086, in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ix. no. 50.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab EDRIC. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Edic }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is presumably a scribal error for }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Edric}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; }{\insrsid4139880 von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid4139880 
Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\insrsid4139880 , p. 236, includes it under Old English }{\i\insrsid4139880 Eadric}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,4,15\tab WESTBURY. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in "Reweset" Hundred in 1086, later in Ford Hundred. The vill was held under the lords of Cause by the Hodnet family in the thirteenth century and by}{\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 the Ludlows in the fourteenth century. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 66a, Odo }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Hodenet }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds 2 hides in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Welbur' }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 of}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 the fee of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Caus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 the same man holds 1 fee in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Westbur' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
of the barony of Thomas Corbet in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 964, 971. William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Lodelou }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 235; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 241; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. no. 52, ix. no. 50, x. no. 115; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 53; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 312.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par \tab \tab Cause, where the Corbets built their castle and which became the centre of their barony, was later in Westbury, but may have been one of the unnamed members of Worthen (4,4,20) in 1086; see 4,4,20 Worthen note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab ERNWY }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 <OF PONTESBURY>. See 4,4,12 Ernwy note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 2 PRIESTS. There was a collegiate church here, not mentioned in Domesday, but implied by the adjacent place-name Minsterley; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 167b; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 213; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 53; and 4,1,7 Minsterley note and \{Introduction: Ecclesiastical Organization\}.}{
\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,4,16\tab WATTLESBOROUGH. It was a township of Alberbury Ancient Parish which was later united with Cardeston Ancient Parish. In 1086 it lay in "Reweset" Hundred, later in Ford Hundred.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab A place called}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Wecelleburne }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
is found in charter-grants by Wulhere, King of the Mercians, ostensibly in 664, and by Ethelred, King of the Mercians, supposedly in 680, both to Peterborough Abbey: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Early Charters of the West Midlands}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 147 nos. 426-27 (= Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, nos. 68, 72); see 4,9,1 Shifnal note. Although the charters are post-Conquest forgeries, the spellings are often pre-Conquest. This place might be Wattlesborough (though the terminations of the two names differ), but, if so, there is no later 
trace of Peterborough Abbey's involvement.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Wattlesborough descended in the Cause barony, being granted in the twelfth century to a subordinate branch of the Corbet family who named Moreton}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Corbet (4,19,9). In }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 964 (barony of Thomas Corbet), Richard Corbet holds in}{\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Weltesborc}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Moreover, Robert 
}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Corbet de Morton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Watlesboru }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 of the barony of}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Robert Corbet in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 241; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 971; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 235.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Wattlesborough}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 developed into a large manor by absorbing other Domesday holdings: thus in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 66a, Robert }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Corbet }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds 3 hides in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Cardel }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Cardeston 4,4,18), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wetlesburgh }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lohton}{\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Loton 4,4,10) of the fee of Cause. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bredeshuil }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Bretchel SJ3311) was probably a}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 member; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 635; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 100; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 196.}{
\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a quarter of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of a resource; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,4,17\tab MARCHE. It was a township of Westbury Ancient Parish, being in "Reweset" Hundred in 1086, later in Ford Hundred. It presumably continued to be held of the lords of Cause, but the subtenants}{\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 named from the place also held the other and larger portion (4,5,10) under the lords of}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Longdon and the particular identity of this holding was lost. It included part of 'Perendon' (see 4,5,10); Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 127; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 316. The later subtenant, Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Mersse}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 also held Eyton (4,4,9).}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab DAEGING. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Dainz }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 probably represents this Old English personal name; see von Feilitzen, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 222. This is the only occurrence of this name in Domesday Book.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,4,18\tab CARDESTON. It was an Ancient Parish which was later united with Alberbury Ancient Parish.. Like Loton (4,4,10) it was absorbed by the growing manor of Wattlesborough before 1255; see 4,4,16 Wattlesborough note; Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 109; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 198.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab GILBERT [* OF SANNERVILLE *]. Gilbert is probably to be identified as Gilbert of Sannerville, in the French d\'e9partement of Calvados (arrondissement Caen, canton Trun): Loyd, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Some Anglo-Norman Families}
{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 94; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 211.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,4,19\tab WHITTON. It lay in Westbury Ancient Parish and was in "Reweset" Hundred in 1086, later in Ford Hundred. It passed to the barony of Cause being held by a branch of the Burnel family that called itself from the place. In }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 66b, Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Wycton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Burnel }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 hold 2 hides in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wycton}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 . The holders in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 964, are Robert and Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Witton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (the latter being also known as Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Burnel}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 who hold }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Witton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 with members from the barony of Thomas Corbet; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, iv. pp. 235, 241; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ix. no. 50; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 65; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 313. It is possible that Wallop (4,4,14 Hanwood note) was a member.
\par \tab \tab The Grid Reference (SJ3409) is to Whitton Hall. Whitton Grange is at SJ3308.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab LEODMER <OF WHITTON>. }{\insrsid4139880 The Domesday forms of this name - }{\i\insrsid4139880 Ledmar}{\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\insrsid4139880 us}{\insrsid4139880 ), }{\i\insrsid4139880 Ledmer}{\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\insrsid4139880 
us}{\insrsid4139880 ),}{\i\insrsid4139880  Lemar}{\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\insrsid4139880 us}{\insrsid4139880 ), }{\i\insrsid4139880 Leimar}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Leodmaer}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Ledmaer}{\insrsid4139880 , }{
\i\insrsid4139880 Leimer}{\insrsid4139880  (as here), }{\i\insrsid4139880 Lemer}{\insrsid4139880  - represent Old English }{\i\insrsid4139880 Leodm\'e6r}{\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{
\insrsid4139880 , p. 310. JRM preferred the second element -mer for Old English }{\i\insrsid4139880 -m\'e6r}{\insrsid4139880 , as it reflected more closely the Domesday spellings. The Alecto edition has Leodm\'e6r.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab There are only two occurrences of this name in Domesday Shropshire, the other Leodmer being one of the predecessors of Alward [son of Almund] in Polmere (4,27,19). Von Feilitzen (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 ibidem}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 310 note 4) stated that he was the same as the present Leodmer, but gave no reason.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a quarter of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,4,20\tab IN WITT
ERY HUNDRED. The main scribe of Great Domesday failed to line through in vermilion this hundred head, as he also did the Hodnet hundred head in 4,7,3 and the 'Conditre' hundred head in 6,5. There is no sign that any of these hundred heads were later addit
ions. For his failure to rubricate several place-names in Shropshire, see 4,3,8 St Peter note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab WORTHEN. This was an Ancient Parish which lay in Wittery Hundred in 1086, then in Chirbury Hundred, though parts of the complex manor lay in Ford Hundred. It was
 a demesne manor of the Corbets and it was probably in one of its unnamed outliers that the family raised their castle of Cause which was to become the centre of their barony: the former identification of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Alretone }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 with Cause is erroneous (see 4,1,8 Trewern note). On the castle, which was perhaps preceded by one at Westbury (Hawcocks Mount), see King, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Castellarium Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 422.}{
\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Thomas Corbet holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Worthin }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 60a, having withdrawn it from suit at Chirbury hundred court; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 112b; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 85, iii. no. 600, ix. no. 50, x. no. 158; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Placita de Quo Warranto}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 718-19; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 232.}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Among the 13 outliers were probably:}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Caus }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Cause SJ3307, said to be named from the Norman Pays de Caux): }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 60a; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 85, iii. no. 600, ix. no. 210; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 216, 235, 241;
\par }{\cf1\insrsid8798677 \tab \tab }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Selve }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Shelve SO3399): }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 60a; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 232; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 600, ix. no. 50;}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Binneweston }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Binweston SJ3004): }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 232; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 600;}{\i\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Astu' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Aston Pigott SJ3305 and Aston Rogers SJ3406) two places held respectively by Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Astu' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Pigod }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 61a; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ix. no. 50;}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Waltu' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Walton SJ2905): }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p.}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 61a.
 It is held by the prior of Chirbury in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 233;
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid8798677 \tab \tab }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Leg' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Leigh SJ3303): }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 60a; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 232; coupled with Walton in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ix. no. 50;}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Habberleg' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Habberley SJ3903): }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 964, 971; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 234; }
{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 635, v. no. 188, ix. no. 50; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 45; and 5,2 Tetstill note;
\par \tab \tab }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hope }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Hope SJ3401):}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 61a; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 964, 972; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 241; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ix. no. 50.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab On the whole manor, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 95; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. pp. 180, 239; and 4,1,35 Trelystan note.
}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 14 \'bd HIDES. The addition of the unnamed \'bd hide of 4,4,6 would make a 15-hide unit.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab PICOT. The name is rare and it possible that this man is Picot of Sai who holds from Earl Roger directly (4,20): Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 325. However, nothing has been found to connect a part of Worthen with the Say family.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab GEOFFREY. See 4,3,27 Geoffrey note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab GRENTO. The only other occurrence of this personal name in Domesday Book is in DEV 5,13: Grento, called a man-at-arms in the corrsponding entry in Exon, was a tenant of Tavistock Abbey.
 There is no evidence that they were one man.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab OF WHAT HE HOLDS. In the manuscript there is a small gap after }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 qd' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and one would expect }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rog' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
to have been inserted. The parchment is slightly roughened in this gap and something may have been erased here: the original returns may have had }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 R. }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
and the main scribe of Great Domesday wrongly extended this to }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Reinfrid' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and then realized his error (the value of his holding is given with the other men-at-arms), erased it and forgotten to insert }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rog'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,4,21\tab RORRINGTON. This was a township of Chirbury Ancient Parish; it lay in Wittery Hundred in 1086, later in Chirbury Hundred. It was divided at Domesday between the Corbet brothers, both holding}{\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 1 virgate (4,5,12). The hedged enclosure was similarly divided; see 4,4 Roger note. By 1255 each portion of Rorrington seems only to have counted as \'bd virgate: in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 61a, Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Longedon }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds \'bd virgate in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rounton}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , presumably from the lords of Cause (although Longden itself (4,5,9) descends fro
m Robert son of Corbet), while William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Mariton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (from Marrington: 4,5,15) holds \'bd virgate from Reginald son of Peter. The former holding appears to be that of Roger son of Corbet and is held by Edmund }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Longedon }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 233. The latter ho
lding, passing to the Fitz Herberts (4,5 Robert note), appears to be that of Robert son of Corbet (4,5,12) held by Lucas }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Roriton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 233; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 560. On the manor as a whole, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 93.}{\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ALWARD [* SON OF ALMUND *]. See 3f,2 Alward note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab DOES NOT PAY TAX. The main scribe of Great Domesday omitted to put a hair-line below the interlined }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \'f1}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (for }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 non}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 )}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 to indicate its position in the text.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,4,22\tab LEIGHTON. Thi
s was a township of Worthen Ancient Parish; it is now in Leighton with Trelystan Civil Parish and lies in Montgomeryshire. It lay in Wittery Hundred in 1086. Like Bausley (4,4,8) which was similarly left in Wales at the dissolution of the Marcher lordship
s in the sixteenth century, it was hidated but did not pay tax. After 1086 it was drawn into the Corbet Welshry of Upper Gorddwr; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Placita de Quo Warranto}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 718-19; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 116; Sandford, 'Leighton', pp. 333-54; and 4,1,36 Ackley note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 RIDER. The main scribe of Great Domesday had to interline }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 7}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 un' radman }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
above the ploughmen rather than after them (the usual place for riders) because there was more room between the lines there.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,4,23\tab ROGER HOLDS. It is possible that
 the main scribe of Domesday has confused his Rogers in the last three entries of Roger son of Corbet's sub-chapter (4,23-25). However, he may have been aware of a problem of identity as he did not precede each 'Roger' with }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 isdem }
{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ('the same'), as he did in 4,4,2-22. Moreover, he included }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de com}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 ite}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
] which he normally reserved for the first entry in a sub-chapter. See SHR 4 Roger note. There is no sign, however, that these three entries were added, as tentatively suggested by Lewis, 'Introduction', }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Shropshire Domesday}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 12. Descent of 4,4,23 is to the Lacy family and this suggests that the 1086 holder may have been Roger of Lacy, who holds under Earl Roger in 4,8, and from the king in chapter 7; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 326 note 50.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab MONTFORD. This was an 
Ancient Parish. It lay in Baschurch Hundred in 1086 and was later in Pimhill Hundred. Roger of Lacy, if not the 1086 tenant, seems to have been in possession of the manor soon after Domesday, for he gave it to Shrewsbury Abbey before 1091: the Shrewsbury 
Cartulary (Rees, pp. 33, 38, 260). The gift seems not to have lasted since Montford later appears in the Lacy fief: in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 76a, John Fitz Alan holds 1 \'bd hides in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Moneford }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 of the fee of Matilda }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Lacy}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Pimhill Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 119; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 215, 230; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 812; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 124; and 4,8,14 Forton note.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 3 HIDES. [\'85]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a space suitable for about five letters after }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 iii }{\i\f703\cf1\insrsid4139880 hid\'ea}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ;}{\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 see 1,5 hide note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \'bd FISHERY. The other half was across the River Severn at Ford (4,1,16 mill note).}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining half a line after the woodland detail, perhaps for the later insertion of other resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab BISHOP R[OBERT]. He is probably Robert Losinga, Bishop of Hereford 1079-1095, but see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 291 note 60. The Alecto edition leaves him as 'Bishop R'.}{
\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab See also Fleming, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday Book and the Law}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 225 no. 1328.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,4,24\tab ROGER HOLDS. See 4,4,23 Roger note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab PRESTON [MONTFORD]. Preston Montford was
 formerly in the Ancient Parish of Shrewsbury St Alkmund, and is now in Bicton parish. Bicton itself was a township and chapelry of the Ancient Parish of Shrewsbury St Chad. It is now a separate Civil Parish and Ecclesiastical Parish. In 1086 this portion
 
of Preston Montford lay in Baschurch Hundred, but a larger part (held by St Alkmund's: 3g,10) was in "Reweset" Hundred. Onslow (3f,7. 4,5,7) was divided in the same way. This part seems to have joined the other after 1086 and to have gone with the rest of
 St Alkmund's lands to endow Lilleshall Abbey: Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 194, x. p. 128. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, vi. no. 137, Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Forde }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds 1 virgate in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Preston by Moneford }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from the Abbot of Lilleshall. Thus the attac
hment to St Alkmund appears to post-date Domesday and it will have been taken only at that time into St Alkmund's parish, unless the 1086 tenure was illegal.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab FOR THE LACK OF POPULATION in this manor, see 4,3,19 population note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab THE VALUE WAS AND IS. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Valuit 7}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 ualuit }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 was originally written; the \endash }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 ui-}{
\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 were scraped out of the second }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 ualuit}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 but the main scribe of Great Domesday omitted to insert an }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 e 
}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in their place to make the present tense }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 ualet}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,4,25\tab ROGER HOLDS. See 4,4,23 Roger note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab CHERRINGTON?. If correctly identified, this was a township of Edgmond Ancient Parish and is now a separate Civil Parish.
\par \tab \tab Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Cerlitone }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 said to be in Wrockwardine Hundred. Identifications have hesitated between 'Charlton',
 either in Shawbury or near Preston Gubbals, and Cherrington. 'Charlton' in Shawbury was probably in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086 (see 3g,9 'Charlton'note) and if this holding were combined with St Alkmund's it would follow the same course as 4,4,24, Pres
ton [Montford], in being absorbed by a manor of the same church. Moreover, in 1066, a Wulfric held parts of Withington (4,27,2) and Great Wytheford (4,3,5) and all of Sleap (4,14,26), all adjacent to 'Charlton'.
\par \tab \tab St Alkmund's also held another 'Charlton' n
ear Preston Gubbals, but to identify the present holding with it requires the substitution of a Baschurch hundred head for Wrockwardine Hundred. Moreover, that 'Charlton' may simply have been a member of Preston Gubbals in 1086 as later; see 3g,8 Preston 
note; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 173.
\par \tab \tab Charlton in Wrockwardine itself, which went to Shrewsbury Abbey, can be ruled out as it appears to have been part of Earl Roger's manor there in 1086 (4,1,1 St Peter note).
\par \tab \tab Cherrington (in Edgmond parish) has two arguments for it: the hidage given by }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 57b, is 4 hides, and could represent the combination of this 1 hide with the 3 hides of 4,23,4; secondly, the name form }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Cerlitone }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (perhaps with a nunnation mark omitted over the }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 i) }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is more likely to produce 'Cherrington' than 'Charlton'. Cherrington of 4,23,4 is Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Cerlintone}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
. Moreover, none of the many places called 'Charlton' in Ekwall, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Dictionary of English Place-Names}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , has an early form in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 -i-}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 . The identification of }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Cerlitone}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  with Cherrington is accepted by }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 76. However, in none of the possible identifications has any trace of a Fitz Corbet or a Lacy holding been found; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 326 note 52, xi. pp. 312-313; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 253.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,5\tab ROBERT SON OF CORBET. Robert was the younger brother of Roger son of Corbet (4,4 Roger note). His Domesday fief was divided between his daughters Sibyl (who married Herbert son of Herbert, the king's chamberlain) and Alic
e (who married William Botterell of Cornwall). Sibyl was also a mistress of King Henry I. Her portion of the fief descended in the family of Fitz Herbert whose representative in 1255 (in the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
) is Reginald son of Peter. Alice's portion continued in the family of Botterell who held the 'barony' of Longden (4,5,9); see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. pp. 146-70; Keats-Rohan, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 373.
\par \tab \tab Robert's elder brother Roger holds the previous sub-chapter (4,4) in Domesday Shropsh
ire. In other counties (see DEV 19. DEV 24. DEV 25) villages are regularly divided between brothers and this is true here of Marsh (4,4,17 and 4,5,10) and Rorrington (4,4,21 and 4,5,12). The hundreds, where they correspond, are listed in the same order wi
t
hin each fief. It is possible that the brothers shared a single chapter in the volume for this circuit as did Walter of Claville and Gotshelm (possibly his brother) in Exon, corresponding to DEV 24-25. Or, if all Earl Roger's lands were included in one la
rge composite section in the circuit volume (SHR 4 Roger note), the brothers' lands could still have been detailed next to each other within each hundred in it.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab The hundredal order of this sub-chapter is as follows (the bracketed numbers are explained in SHR 4 arrangement note):
\par \tab \tab 4,5,1-5 Condover Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,5,6 "Rinlau" Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,5,7-11 "Reweset" Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,5,12-15 Wittery Hundred}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,5,1\tab WOOLSTASTON. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Condover Hundred in 1086 and later. At the division of Robert son of Corbet's fief, Woolstaston passed to the Botterell family. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 62a, Joanna }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Le Engles }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds the 2 hides from William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Botreus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
while in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 966, Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Anglicus }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds half a}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 fee in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wlstanestan' }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 from the land of Aubrey }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Botereus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 973 (where it is wrongly stated to be part of the barony of Hugh }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Kylpec'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,4,1 Welbatch note); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 230, 240; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. nos. 194, 587; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 151; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 172.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 \'bd}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 PLOUGHS. The Ordnance Survey facsimile does not reproduce the abbreviation line in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 car'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
: it is fairly faint in the manuscript, but is visible in the Alecto facsimile. See 3f,7 plough note on other imperfect reproductions in the Ordnance Survey facsimile.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining quarter of a line after the woodland detail, perhaps for the later insertion of another resource; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,5,2\tab 
RATLINGHOPE. This was an Ancient Parish. It presumably lay in Condover Hundred in 1086 (hundred head above 4,5,1), but was later in Purslow Hundred. From Robert son of Corbet, it passed to the Fitz Herberts, and before 1209 a s
mall Augustinian priory was established here as a cell of Wigmore (Herefordshire) endowed with at least half a}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 hide. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 77a, the Abbot of Wigmore holds \'bd hide there from Reginald son of Peter; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 165a; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 233; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 iii. p. 203; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 80; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}
{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 158; Knowles and Hadcock,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Medieval Religious Houses}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 151.
\par \tab \tab A member of Ratlinghope was }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 La Scutte}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 La Stinte }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Stitt SO4098) where \'bd
 hide was held by Haughmond Abbey from Thomas Corbet in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 77a; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 163b; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. pp. 163-66, xi. p. 191. It became part of the abbot's manor of 'Boveria' ('oxen pastu
re') which grouped the manors of Betchcott and Leebotwood (4,27,13), Cothercott (4,27,8), Wilderley (4,22,2), Picklescott (4,27,15 Smethcott note) and Stitt: the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, p. 11 and nos. 185-86, 880, 882-83, 1185, 1325-28).}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 2 HIDES [***]. As the main scribe of Great Domesday did not put a dot after }{\i\f703\cf1\insrsid4139880 ii hid\'ea}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  the central margin would have to have been used for any insertion of }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 geld'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  as the side ruling falls on the }{\i\f703\cf1\insrsid4139880 \'ea }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 of }{\i\f703\cf1\insrsid4139880 hid\'ea}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
see 4,3,35 hides note. However, it is possible, despite the capital used for }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wastae}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , that he intended '2 hides are and were waste', as the preceding manor had a value }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880  and 'now'.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,5,3\tab WOMERTON. This land formerly lay in the Ancient Parish of Church Stretton and now lies in the Civil Parish of All Stretton. It was in
 Condover Hundred in 1086. Most was waste in 1086 and probably long continued to be so. The overlordship was forfeited in 1102 and after the death of Robert son of Corbet, some time after 1121, the manor was not retained by his descendants. It seems to ha
ve been absorbed by the manor of Stretton (4,1,27) and transferred to Munslow Hundred. A wood at Womerton (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 boscus de Wimbriston'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is mentioned in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 84b, within the manor of Stretton. See Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 157; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 90.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab AUTI <OF LEEBOTWOOD>. The name Auti occurs on 39 holdings spread mainly across Midland England; but the Auti holding the six holdings in Shropshire, Staffordshire and Warwickshire can be identified with a degree of 
confidence as one individual (4,5,3. 4,27,12-13. 7,4. STS 8,10. WAR 12,8). Five of the six people called Auti held from Earl Roger of Shrewsbury or his tenants; in three instances an Auti held both in 1066 and 1086 (JP).}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab ARNGRIM < OF WOMERTON>. The Domesday forms of this name - }{\i\insrsid4139880 Arnegri}{\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\insrsid4139880 m}{\insrsid4139880 ], }{\i\insrsid4139880 Ergrim}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Arnegrin}{
\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Ernegrin}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Aergrim}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Aregrim}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Aregrin}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Haregrim}{\insrsid4139880 , 
}{\i\insrsid4139880 Haregrin}{\insrsid4139880  - represent Old Danish }{\i\insrsid4139880 Arngrim}{\insrsid4139880 , Old Norse }{\i\insrsid4139880 Arngrimr}{\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}
{\insrsid4139880 , pp. 162-63. In the printed Phillimore edition of Yorkshire the Old Norse form was used; this has now been standardized as Arngrim. The Alecto edition has Arngrim.}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 As in the present entry, the holdings of an Arnketil and an Arngrim were combined in 1086 in HEF 11,1-2.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par \tab \tab The name Arngrim oc
curs on 14 holdings in Domesday Book, probably representing four or five individuals. The four holdings on the border of Herefordshire and Shropshire are likely to have been held by one individual in 1066 since Arngrim shared three of them with an Arnketi
l while the fourth, Pedwardine, lay close to two of the other three (JP).}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab IN TOTAL, VALUE ... 68s. That is, the total of the values of the four manors before 1066 came to 68s.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,5,4\tab OAKS. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hach}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Oaks was a township of the Ancient Parish of Pontesbu
ry and a member of Ford Hundred; but was in Condover Hundred in 1086 and later. It descended to the Botterell family, but had before 1191 been granted to Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Girros }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(4,21 Helgot note) whose undertenants in the thirteenth century were the Bicton family. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 62b, Isabella }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Biketon' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
and her sister hold 2 hides in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Akes }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from the heir(s) of Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Girros}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 230; Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 166; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 266; Purton, 'Manor of Okes', pp. 30-35.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ERNWY <OF PONTESBURY>. See 4,4,12 Ernwy note and 4,5,7 he note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,5,5\tab BROMPTON. It lay in Berrington Ancient Parish, was in Condover Hundred in 1086 and remained there. There is no later evidence of a Fitz Corbet holding here. The vill may 
have remained waste, or been combined with Picot of Say's larger and better cultivated manor (4,20,1); see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 169; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 19.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The main scribe of Great Domesday may not have been convinced that this 
was a holding of Robert son of Corbet as he wrote 'Robert holds from the earl' instead of his usual 'The same Robert holds'; see SHR 4 Roger note. However, he also used this formula in 4,5,6-7 and the later evidence suggests that these were holdings of Ro
bert son of Corbet in 1086.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab EARL. The Ordnance Suvey facsimile fails to reproduce the abbreviation line in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 com'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
: it is faint in the manuscript and only just visible in the Alecto facsimile. See 3f,7 plough note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,5,6\tab CHOULTON. This was a township of Lydbu
ry North Ancient Parish. Lydbury North was held in 1086 by the Bishop of Hereford (2,1) and the connection with Choulton may not have been ancient. Choulton lay in "Rinlau" Hundred in 1086, later in Purslow Hundred. In the division of Robert son of Corbet
's estates, half of Choulton and half of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Eton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(Eaton SO3789), which it included, went to the Fitz Herberts, the other half of each vill to the Botterell family. The Fitz Herberts gave the tithes of Choulton to the Church of Pontesbury and Choulton and Eaton themselves to Wigmore Abbey: in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 233, the Abbot of Wigmore holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Eton}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 165a. The Botterell family continued to hold their half of Choulton and Eaton: in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 p. 1283, Reginald }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Botereus }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds half of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Cheleston' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and half of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Eton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 belonging to the manor of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Langedon' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(Longden: 4,5,9); see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 192.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab GUNFRID. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Gunuert }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 here and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Gunner }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in 6,14 represent the hypothetical Old Norse }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Gunnfrothr}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
: von Feilitzen, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 277, according to whom (note 7), he is the same as the 'Gunfrid' who held the site of Wigmore Castle in HEF 9,1. See 6,14 Gunfrid note.}{
\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,5,7\tab ONSLOW. It formerly lay in the Ancient Parish of Shrewsbury St Chad,
 now in Bicton parish. Bicton itself was a township and chapelry of the Ancient Parish of Shrewsbury St Chad. It is now a separate Civil Parish and Ecclesiastical Parish. In 1086 Onslow was divided between two hundreds: the holding of St Chad's Church (3f
,7) lay in Baschurch Hundred, this holding of Robert son of Corbet lay in "Reweset" Hundred, then in Ford Hundred. There was probably no ancient connection between this estate and the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 parochia}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  of St Chad.

\par \tab \tab The vill went to the Botterell family, being held under them by the Arundels: in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 66a, John }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Arundel }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds 1 hide in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Ondeslawe }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 as part of Longden manor (4,5,9); see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 177.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ERNWY <OF PONTESBURY>. See 4,4,12 Ernwy note and 4,5,7 he note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 
HE HELD IT HIMSELF. That is, Ernwy, perhaps the same man as the holder in 1066 and 1086 of Pontesbury, Farley and maybe of Westbury in 1066 which were held by Robert's brother Roger (4,4,12-13;15) and possibly also of Oaks in 1066 (4,5,4). See 4,4,12 Ernw
y note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab WITH 1 PLOUGH. The Ordnance Survey facsimile does not reproduce the dot after }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 car' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 which is in the manuscript. See 3f,7 plough note. It is just visible in the Alecto facsimile.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab NOW 12[s]. The central ruling falls between the two minims of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 xii}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 whi
ch is probably the reason why the main scribe of Great Domesday omitted the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 sol'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  . Compare 4,27,9 now note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,5,8\tab WOODCOTE. It formerly in the Ancient Parish of Shrewsbury St Chad and is now in Bicton parish. Bicton itself was a township and chapelry of th
e Ancient Parish of Shrewsbury St Chad. It is now a separate Civil Parish and Ecclesiastical Parish. The connection of Woodcote with the parochial of St Chad was probably not ancient.
\par \tab \tab Woodcote lay in "Reweset" Hundred in 1086, later in Ford Hundred. From Robert son of Corbet it passed to the Fitz Herberts. By 1255 }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wodecote }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 was divided into three portions: William }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Horton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 held \'bd hide from Reginald son of Peter and William's son Nicholas likewise held \'bd}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 hide. The remaining 2 virgates were held by William }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Woddecote }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from the Abbot of Buildwas; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 260b; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, vii. p. 144; and SHR 3f St Chad's note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 BURGESS. He was no doubt in the borough of Shrewsbury.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,5,9\tab LONGDEN. It was formerly a township of Po
ntesbury Ancient Parish. It lay in "Reweset" Hundred in 1086, later in Ford Hundred. At the division of Robert son of Corbet's estates, Longden went to the Botterell family and became }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 caput }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
of their barony. It was held by the family until }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .1282, was then conveyed to Robert Burnell (Bishop of Bath and Wells 1275-1292) and then descended like Acton Burnell (4,4,3). In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 66a, Reginald }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Boterel }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds 2 hides in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Longedon'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 while in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 216, the Bishop of Bath and Wells holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lundgedon }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from the king by service of two foot soldiers for 40 days in wartime; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 966, 972 (wrongly given as the barony of Herbert son of Peter); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, ii. no. 47, iii. no. 194, v. no. 611, viii. no. 667; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 96b; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 234, 242; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 156; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 264.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,5,10\tab MARCHE. It was formerly a township of Westbury Ancient
 Parish; it lay in "Reweset" Hundred in 1086, later in Ford Hundred. It included half of the hamlet of 'Perendon' (see 4,4,17) and passed from Robert son of Corbet to William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Boterell }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
c}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 1141) continuing in the Botterell family, the lords of Longden (4,5,9). Its subtenant was }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Mersse }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
who held Eyton (4,4,9) and also the smaller part of Marche under the lords of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Cause}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 One hide in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Marsse }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
is held by Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Marsse }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 66a, of the manor of Longden and another part by the Abbot of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Pola }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Ystrad Marchel or Strata Marcella in the parish of Pool just east of Welshpool: Knowles and Hadcock, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Medieval Religious Houses}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 116; Jones, 'Abbey of Ystrad Marchell') of the fee of Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Botereus }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 67a. Some lands we
re also given to Haughmond Abbey; see the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, nos. 738-41); Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 127; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 315.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab TAX. The Ordnance Survey facsimile does not reproduce the dot after }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 geld' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 which is in the manuscript and is perfectly visible in the Alecto facsimile. See 3f,7 plough note.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,5,11\tab WIGMORE. This was a township of Westbury Ancient Parish. The single 1086 estate became Upper Wigmore (SJ3411) and Lower Wigmore (SJ3511) later: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , 
i. p. 314. It lay in "Reweset" Hundred in 1086, later in Ford Hundred. From Robert son of Corbet it descended to the Botterells, lords of Longden (4,5,9): in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 66a, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wygimor }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Brerlawe }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (a lost place in Wigmore manor), 1 hide, is held by Adam }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Brerlawe }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
of the manor of Longden; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 170.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,5,12\tab RORRINGTON. See 4,4,21 Rorrington note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \'bd HEDGED ENCLOSURE. The other half is recorded in 4,4,21.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,5,13\tab MIDDLETON. This was formerly in Chirbury An
cient Parish and is now an Ecclesiastical Parish in its own right, sometimes known as Middleton-in-Chirbury; for civil purposes, it is still in Chirbury (Civil) Parish. It lay in Wittery Hundred in 1086 and was later in Chirbury Hundred. From Robert son o
f Corbet it passed to the Botterells, lords of Longden (4,5,9): in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 60b, Roger son of Grant holds}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 two-thirds of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Middeltun }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in Chirbury Hundred of the barony of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Longedun}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 383, two parts of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Midelton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Kyngton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Kinton SO2899) are held}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 for 2 virgates from William }
{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Botereus }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 by Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Grauntesone}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 232, 241;}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 87. For the other half of Middleton, later counted as a third of the}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 vill, see 4,27,22.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab EDRIC THE WILD. See 4,1,14 Edric note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,5,14\tab PRIESTWESTON. It lay in Chirbury Ancient Parish but is now in Middleton-in-Chirbury Ecclesiastical Parish; for c
ivil purposes, it is still in Chirbury (Civil) Parish. It lay in Wittery Hundred in 1086, later in Chirbury Hundred. It passed to the Botterell family's barony of Longden: Llewellyn }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Kolebe }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Westun' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from that barony in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 61a, while John }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Haudlo }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Prestesweston}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 a parcel of the manor of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Longedon}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. no. 667. It is called 'Priest' Weston from the estate of the prior of Chirbury at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Parva Weston }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Little Weston SO2998) mentioned in the }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 162b; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 iii. p. 212; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 92.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab RIDERS ... THEY PAY 20s. In view of the lack of a 1086 value recorded for this manor, it is possible that the riders were 'farming' this manor; see 3d,5 revenue note. According to Nelson, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Normans in South Wales}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 46-47, these riders (wrongly numbered as six there) are the same as the six thanes who had held it }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,5,15\tab MARRINGTON. This was a township of Chirbury Ancient Parish, and was in Wittery Hundred in 1086, later in Chirbury Hundred. It passed to the Fitz Herberts: in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 972, William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Merinton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Merinton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from the barony of Herbert son of Peter, while in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 61a, William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Maritun }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Maritun }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from Reginald son of Peter; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 560, vi. no. 464; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 89.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ALWARD [* SON OF ALMUND *]. See 3f,2 Alward note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,6\tab ROBERT THE BUTLER. Robert was Earl Roger's butler; see Mason, 'Officers and Clerks',}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
p. 249. He probably forfeited his small fief when Earl Roger's son Robert rebelled (see SHR 4 Roger note); it was subsequently granted by the Crown to the honour of Montgomery: Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 392. He is not the same man as the Robert the butler of GLS 40,1 Robert note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab The hundredal order of this sub-chapter is as follows (the bracketed numbers are explained in SHR 4 arrangement note):
\par \tab \tab 4,6,1-4 Baschurch Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,6,5 [Wrockwardine] Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,6,6 ["Merset"] Hundred}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,6,1\tab WALFORD. This was in Baschurch Ancient Parish. It lay in Baschurch Hundred in 1086, later in Pimhill Hundred. It receives sparse mention in later documents since it seems to have been
 absorbed by the manor of Stanwardine-in-the-Fields; see 4,6,2 Stanwardine note; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 291. Land in Walford was given }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
. 1216-1218 to Haughmond Abbey:}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, nos. 36-7, 544, 772, 1227, 1272-81, 1323).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab STURMY. The Domesday form is }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Sturmid }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 here and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Estormid}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Estormit}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 Sturmi}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Turmit }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 elsewhere in Domesday. A Richard 'Sturmy' holds in Wiltshire, Hampshire, and Surrey and a Ralph 'Sturmy' in Norfolk. The name is from Old French }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
estormi }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 meaning 'stunned, disturbed, overwhelmed': Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 345. See also WIL L61 Sturmy note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 2 HIDES. [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the rest of the line after }{\i\f703\cf1\insrsid4139880 ii hid\'ea. }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in this entry; see 1,5 hide note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab IN LORDSHIP. The Ordnance Survey facsimile does not reproduce the abbreviation lines in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 d'nio }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 or in }{\i\f710\cf1\insrsid4139880 \'e7}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }
{\cf1\insrsid4139880 though they are not particularly faint in the manuscript. See 3f,7 plough note. They are both visible in the Alecto facsimile.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,6,2\tab STANWARDINE[-IN-THE-FIELDS]. This lay in Baschurch Ancient Parish; it was in Baschurch Hundred in 1086, later in Pimhill Hundred. The manor absorbed adjacent vills so that the 2 hides of Stanwardine had by 1255 become 5 
\'bd hides: Walford (4,6,1) and Eyton (4,6,4) were presumably included together with a further \'bd hide from somewhere else. Descent was to the honour of Montgomery: in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 75b, William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Lechton'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Philip }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Huggeford}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
the Abbot of Haughmond, Hugh }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Patinton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and John }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Esseford }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 hold 5 \'bd hides of the fee of William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Cantilupo }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(i.e. the honour of Montgomery). It}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stanworthin in the Feld }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 235, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Stanwardyne super Campum }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Pimhill Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 121; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 105a; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 966; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 17; the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, nos. 1273-74, 1323); Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 298.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 2 HIDES. [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the rest of the line after }{\i\f703\cf1\insrsid4139880 ii hid\'ea. }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in this entry; see 1,5 hide note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,6,3\tab 
PETTON. This was a chapelry of Baschurch Ancient Parish and is now a parish in its own right. It was in Baschurch Hundred in 1086, later in Pimhill Hundred. Petton had the same descent as Stanwardine-in-the-Fields (4,6,2) and in 1255 (}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 75a) }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Petton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 was divided into 1 \'bd hides held by Richard }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Petton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 of the fee of }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stanewrthin }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and \'bd hide held by the same man from the Abbot of Shrewsbury. Half a hide in Petton had been given by Hugh }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Constantino }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 to Shrewsbury Abbey (the
 Shrewsbury Cartulary: Rees, pp. xxi, 33, 38, 41, 258); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 635; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 308.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab RALPH [* OF COSTENTIN *]. See 4,3,67 Ralph note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 \'bd HIDES. [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a space suitable for about five letters after }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 i hida 7}{\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 dimid'.}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ;}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 see 1,5 hide note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a space suitable for about seven letters after the population, rather small for the later insertion of any resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,6,4\tab EYTON. The Domesday form is}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Hetone. }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 The place lay in Baschurch Ancient Parish. It was in Baschurch Hundred in 1086. After Domesday it had little independent history
, being absorbed by the manor of Stanwardine-in-the-Fields (4,6,2); see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 306.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 HIDE. [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a space suitable for about five letters after }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 i hida.}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see 1,5 hide note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,6,5\tab [IN WROCKWARDINE HUNDRED]. Crudgington is assumed by }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, xi. p. 95, to have been in Baschurch Hundred in 1086 (hundred head above 4,6,1). But bearing in mind its geographical position and the fact that it becomes a member of Sleap manor in 'Bradfor
d' Hundred, it may well have been in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086. It is taxed in 'Bradford' Hundred in 1327 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lay Subsidy Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Shropshire (1327)}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 184), and in 1334 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lay Subsidy Roll (1334)}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 251).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab CRUDGINGTON. There is no difficulty in identifying Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Crugetone}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 left unidentified by Eyton (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 308), with Crudgington that was a township of the Ancient Parish of Ercall Magna (also known as High Ercall); see Ekwall, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Dictionary of English Placenames}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, under Crudgington; Hill, 'The Demesne and the Waste', pp. 4-5 and note 7; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 103. Eyton accounted for Crudgington as a member of High Ercall (Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 102) and it certainly seems to have followed the same early descent. It was given to Shrewsbury Abbey by Hamo }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Peverel}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 lord of High Ercall, between 1135 and 1139 (see the Shrewsbury Cartulary: Rees, no. 40 pp. 47-48) and seems thereafter to have been accounted as part of the abbey's manor of Sleap which consisted of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Slepe }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Sleap SJ6317, perhaps part of High Ercall: 4,1,21), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Crugulton}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Kynnersley }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Kynnersley 4,23,1) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Butterley }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Buttery: 4,14,17) according to the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 117. Sleap and Kynnersley were given to the abbey by Hamo }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Peverel }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
at the same time as Crudgington; Buttery was given }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 . 1170-1175 by Ivo }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Pantulf}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 : the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, p. 29).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 1000 EELS. This was written by the main scribe of Great Domesday in the right margin of the manuscript; as the colour of the 
ink and the pen are the same as for the rest of the entry, it was probably an early addition. He may have put it one line too low, after the value instead of after the fisheries. These eels were no doubt an additional uncommuted payment from the 4 fisheri
es; in 4,1,21 a fishery in High Ercall (in whose parish Crudgington lay) rendered 1,502 large eels.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,6,6\tab [IN "MERSET" HUNDRED]. The restoration of this heading depends on the identity of Aston: 4,6,6 Aston note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ASTON. This place was probably the Aston wh
ich lay in Oswestry Ancient Parish; a "Merset" Hundred heading will have to be supplied, similar to the one added by the main scribe of Great Domesday in the margin next to the last entry in 4,18. It is the 'east }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 tun}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 ' of Oswestry: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 22. This land appears to have escheated to the Crown like other members of this fief and then to have been granted to the honour of Montgomery. The whole of "Merset" Hundred was lost to the county in the early thirteenth century and the status of 
Aston became uncertain: \{Introduction: Hundreds\}. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 89b, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Asto}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Hydeslont }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(Hisland SJ3127) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wodeto }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Wootton: 4,3,39) are surveyed in Chirbury Hundred (the successor to Wittery Hundred) and are said to be held of the honour of M
ontgomery but to have been removed by John Fitz Alan. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 812, of John Fitz Alan, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Aston}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 Wodeton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hideslond }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 appear as knights' fees in Oswestry, together with }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Twyford }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bromehurst}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , that is Twyford (SJ3426) in West Felton and Bromwich? (SJ3225). In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 236, on the other hand, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wotton}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Aston }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hideslond }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 are surveyed in Pimhill Hundred (the successor to Baschurch Hundred), and are held by the Abbot of Haughmond, Thomas }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
de Wotton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and Thomas son of Philip. They are said to lie in the March of Wales, outside the county of Shropshire. It will be noted that Domesday mentions 12 Welshmen at Aston. Haughmond's portion is called }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Aston Abbots iuxta Oswestree }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
iii. p. 192. See the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, nos. 36-113, 145, 484, 547-48, 555-58, 565-68, 736, 842, 1272-74, 1360, 1368-69); Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 10; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 327 note 58.
\par \tab \tab Aston would have formally been returned to the county in 1536 on the dissolution of the Marcher lordships.
\par \tab \tab The Grid Reference is to Aston Hall (SJ325272); Aston Farm is at SJ325280.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab WULFRIC HELD IT [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining half of the line after }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 tenuit }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
which has no dot after it. It was probably left for the insertion of a hundred head; see 4,1,22 earl note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 2 HIDES [***]. I The main scribe of Great Domesday left a gap suitable for about five letters after }{\i\f703\cf1\insrsid4139880 ii hid\'ea}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 see 1,5 hide note.}
{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a third of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,7\tab ROGER OF COURSEULLES. }{\insrsid4139880 He was a Norman from Courseulles-sur-Mer (in the French d\'e9parte
ment of Calvados (arrondissement Caen, canton Creully). He received his lands from his father William and held a large fief, }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 almost a hundred entries, }{\insrsid4139880 in chief in Somerset (SOM 21) and }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
a single manor each in Dorset and in Wiltshire.}{\insrsid4139880 . From the Exon entry }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 corresponding to SOM 5,4, it is apparent that he was also known as }{\insrsid4139880 Roger}{\i\insrsid4139880  Witen}{\insrsid4139880  (}{
\i\insrsid4139880 Wytent}{\insrsid4139880  in the Tax Return for the Somerset hundred of Cheddar, Exon folio 76a2); see Tengvik, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Old English Bynames}{\insrsid4139880 , pp. 11, 146. This name is Old English }{\i\insrsid4139880 Hwiting}{
\insrsid4139880 , a patronymic derived from Old English }{\i\insrsid4139880 Hwita}{\insrsid4139880  ('white') presumably used by Englishmen as a nickname for a Norman with exceptionally fair skin or white hair.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Roger's}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  lands in Shropshire (which may have been forfeited in 1102 after the rebellion of Earl Roger\rquote s son Robert) passed to the Pandolf barony of Wem}{\insrsid4139880 . See }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 46, ix. p. 194; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 298; Sanders, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 English Baronies}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 94; }{\insrsid4139880 Loyd, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Some Anglo-Norman Families}{\insrsid4139880 , p. 33; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\insrsid4139880 , p. 403.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab The hundredal order of this sub-chapter is as follows (the bracketed numbers are explained in SHR 4 arrangement note):
\par \tab \tab 4,7,1-2 Wrockwardine Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,7,3-5 Hodnet Hundred}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,7,1\tab SUTTON[-UPON-TERN]. This was formerly the Ancient Parish of Drayton-in-Hales (also known as
 Market Drayton). It is now in the Ecclesiastical Parish of Little Drayton, but for civil purposes is a parish in its own right. The village is now known as Sutton, the district as Sutton-upon-Tern. It was in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086 (whereas Market D
rayton was in Hodnet Hundred), and later in 'Bradford' Hundred. It passed to the barons of Wem and was held under them by a family}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
named Eyton (from Eyton-upon-the-Weald-Moors: 4,14,18, also held from the Wem barony). In later times Sutton seems to be assessed with the Eyton family's other manors: in the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 115, Peter }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Eyton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Eyton}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Brocketon }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Bratton: 4,14,19), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Sutton }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 and half of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lawley }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Lawley: 4,14,21) together with land in Stafford\-shire from the barony of Wem; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, viii. p. 51, and the correction by Purton, 'Sutton upon Tern', p. 42.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab A member of Sutton was }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Cliva }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Cliff Grange SJ6532) given to Combermere Abbey by Ivo }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Pantulf}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 : Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 52; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 261a.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,7,2\tab 
TIBBERTON. This was formerly a township of Edgmond Ancient Parish and is now a separate Civil Parish. It lay in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086 and was later in 'Bradford' Hundred. The bulk of the holding passed to the Pandolfs of Wem (4,
14,4 Wem note), but 1 hide was given to Shrewsbury Abbey by Baldwin, son of Gilbert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Conedovera}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and his wife }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Richeldis}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 : the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, p. 43; see pp. 46, 75, 76, 249). In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 56b, 1 hide is held by the Abbot of Shrewsbury, 1 hide by John }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
de Halts }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and 3 hides by four others with service on these last 4 hides at the castle of Wem; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 46; and 4,1,22 Dawley note.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab WHICH PAY TAX. It is possible that }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 geld' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 was a later addition 
to the text by the main scribe of Great Domesday: it is in darker ink and in the right margin. His failure to put a dot after }{\i\f703\cf1\insrsid4139880 hid\'ea}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 may have been because he intended to add to the phrase; see 4,1,1 pay note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank three-quarters of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,7,3\tab IN HODNET HUNDRED. On the lack of rubrication on this hundred head, see 4,4,20 Wittery note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab EDGELEY. The Domesday name-form is }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Edeslai}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
. This was a township of Whitchurch Ancient Parish. It was in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, later no doubt in 'Bradford' Hundred. It passed to the barony of Wem and lost its separate identity, being enumerated as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Edisley }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 among the members of Wem manor in the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 114; see 4,14,4 Wem note; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 196.}{
\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,7,4\tab 'DODINGTON'. This was a township of Whitchurch Ancient Parish. It has been absorbed by the town and is represented by an area o
r township name and by Dodington Road (Doddington on the 6-inch Ordnance Survey map of 1891); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 110. Dodington lay in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. It passed to the barony of Wem: in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 56b, 1 \'bd}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
hides in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Duthinton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 are held by Ralph }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Pincerna }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wemme}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Dudinton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
is among the lands of William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 le Boteler }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (barony of Wem) in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, ii. no. 529, ix no. 223. Like Edgeley (4,7,3) Dodington is reckoned as a member of Wem manor in the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 114); see 4,14,4 Wem note; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 194.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,7,5\tab STEEL. This was in Prees Ancient Parish. Like the previous two entries, it lay in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred, and similarly passed to the Wem barony and was absorbed by Wem manor: }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stiell' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is enumerated among its members in the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 114; see 4,14,4 Wem note; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 197.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab KOLLUNG <OF STEEL>. }{\insrsid4139880 The Domesday form, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Collinc}{\insrsid4139880 , represents Old Norse }{\i\insrsid4139880 Kollungr}{\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid4139880 
Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\insrsid4139880 , p. 307. JRM preferred not to include the final -r in such Old Norse name-forms as it does not appear in the Domesday forms. In the Phill
imore printed translations the form Colling appears, but as other Old Norse names beginning }{\i\insrsid4139880 Kol-}{\insrsid4139880  were kept as such (e.g. }{\i\insrsid4139880 Kolsveinn}{\insrsid4139880 
), it has been decided to standardize in the present edition. The Alecto edition has Kollungr.
\par \tab \tab There are only two references in Domesday to this name, the other being in DBY 6,49, but there is no evidence that they referred to the same individual.
\par \tab \tab The two holdings are of modest size, some 50 miles apart, and without tenurial associations, they are likely to have belonged to different individuals (JP).}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab THORGER <OF STEEL>.}{\insrsid4139880  The Domesday form, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Turgar}{\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\insrsid4139880 us}{\insrsid4139880 ), represents Old Norse }{\i\insrsid4139880 Thorgeirr}{\insrsid4139880 , Old Danish }{
\i\insrsid4139880 Thorger}{\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\insrsid4139880 , p. 393. In the Phillimore printed edition the form Thorgar was u
sed, but this has now been altered to the Old Danish form. The Alecto edition has Thorger. }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 This is the only occurrence of this name in Domesday Shropshire.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab }{\insrsid4139880 The name Thorger is uncommon, occurring nine times in Domesday Book and probably representing six 
or seven individuals. The very modest holding at Steel is likely to have been the only possession of this Thorger since it was distant from all others, with which it had no tenurial links (JP).}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 HIDE AS 4 MANORS. [***]. This is an unusual phrase: one would expect the}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  pro iiii Maneriis }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 to have been added after the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 tenuer' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
in the line above. The main scribe of Great Domesday probably briefly omitted it and then inserted it after the hidage rather than interlining it above }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 tenuer'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; compare the added 'for 2 m
anors' in 4,3,1;70. There is no change in ink colour or pen at this point. The same word order occurs, however, in 4,14,7. 4,19,10 and 4,27,19, but perhaps also because he briefly omitted the phrase. See 4,21,10 manors note and 4,27,18 manors note for oth
er examples of misplacements of the phrase 'as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 n}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  manors'. Compare GLS 68,2. The inclusion of details on }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 tenure is sporadic in Great Domesday, some counties and circuits having fuller information on it than others and there is virtually none in circui
t VI. It was also added on a surprisingly large number of occasions, especially by scribe B and particularly in Devon and Dorset in circuit II. The scribe left the remainder of the line after it for the inclusion of the taxability of the hide; see 1,5 hid
e note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining half a line after the woodland detail, perhaps for the later insertion of other resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,8\tab ROGER OF LACY. He also held in chief in Shropshire (SHR 7). For biographical details, see SHR 7 Roger note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab When the fief that had been Earl Roger's was forfeited in 1102, Roger of Lacy became a tenant-in-chief of the lands he previously held under Earl Roger and they were joined to the lands (SHR 7)
 that he held directly from the king. The majority descend in the Lacy barony; see SHR 7 Roger note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab The hundredal order of this sub-chapter is as follows (the bracketed numbers are explained in SHR 4 arrangement note):
\par \tab \tab 4,8,1-3 Hodnet Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,8,4-6 Patton Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,8,7-9 Wrockwardine Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,8,10-11 "Culvestan" Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,8,12 Leintwardine Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,8,13 'Overs' Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,8,14 Baschurch Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,8,15 ["Alnodestreu"] Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,8,16 'Conditre' Hundred}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,8,1\tab MORETON [S
AY]. This was a chapelry and township of Hodnet Ancient Parish, later a separate parish. It lay in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. It descended in the Lacy barony, being held in the thirteenth century by the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Verdon }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 family. It was later regarded as a member of Stoke-on-Tern (4,8,7) as Hopton (4,8,3) already was in 1086. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 57a,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Morton de Say'}
{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , 1 \'bd hides, is held by Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Say }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in the manor of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stok' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from John }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Verdon}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Its members, forming the other 1 \'bd hides, that is Styche, Bletchley, Audley Brow and Oldfields, were also counted in Stoke-on-Tern; see 4,8,7 Stoke note; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. no. 54, vii. no. 710, ix. no. 262, x. nos. 205, 637; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 260.
\par \tab \tab }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 MORTVNE}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  was interlined by scribe B, its position in the line below indicated by an insertion mark extending down before }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
. It is not rubricated in common with all of scribe B's work (including nine place-names). See 4,27,29 "Tunestan" note for an additional place-name that he inserted.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab WILLIAM [* OF SAI *]. William here and in 4,8,2 may be William of Sai, the ancestor of the de Say family. A W[illiam] }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Saio }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 appears in the satellite text Evesham K as having a }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 mansio}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  ('messuage') in Gloucester, though this section of Evesham K (Evesham K1) was updated to }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 . 1100; see GLS \{Appendix: The Evesham Manuscripts\}
. The only men called William in the corresponding entry in Domesday Gloucestershire (GLS G4) are William (son of) Baderon, William the scribe and Willi
am the bald, the last two holding a messuage each, while the first holds 2 messuages and appears as holding 17 in Evesham K1. According to Ellis, 'Landholders of Gloucestershire', p. 91 note 3, William 'de Say' was husband of Agnes, daughter of Hugh of Gr
andmesnil and thus the brother-in-law of Roger of Ivry. Sai is in the French d\'e9
partement of Orne (arrondissement and canton Argentan). Theodoric de Say, possibly his son, had succeeded him by 1100 and at some time the family were enfeoffed by Roger of Lacy 
at Stokesay (7,5) which he held in 1086 as a tenant-in-chief; see Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 479. On the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Sai}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  family, see Loyd, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Some Anglo-Norman Families}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 9.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining quarter of a line after the woodland detail, perhaps for the later insertion of another resource; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,8,2\tab LOWE?. If correctly identified, this lay in Wem Ancient Parish and is now in the Civil Parish of Wem Rural. The Domesday form is }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lai}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
. The manor, which was in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, was identified by Eyton (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ix. pp. 268-70) and by the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday Gazetteer}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 as Audley Brow which was later a member of Stoke-on-Tern (4,8,7) and as Lowe by }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 328. Since derivation of Audley (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Aldeley }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
in the thirteenth century) from }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lai }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is unlikely, it is best to regard Audley as a member of Stoke-on-Tern in 1086. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lai }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 may well be Lowe
, but no appropriate later descent of the manor has been found. See 4,14,4 Wem note. The identification is not included in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab WILLIAM [* OF SAI *]. See 4,8,1 William note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 FREE MAN. He might be the 1066 holder Alwy who was a 
free man; elsewhere Great Domesday records pre-Conquest landholders reduced to the status of subtenants of the vill that they had once held in chief. Compare 4,14,26 man note and 4,16,1 men note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,8,3\tab IN THIS HUNDRED. That is, in Hodnet Hundred; the heading is above 4,8,1.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab HOPTON. This was in Hodnet Ancient Parish and it lay in Hodnet Hundred in 1086 and was later in 'Bradford' Hundred. It was given by a Lacy tenant, Elias }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Say}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, to Haughmond Abbey, a gift confirmed in 1172 by Pope Alexander III (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 112 no. xii). In 1255 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 58a) }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hopton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in 'Bradford' Hundred is held of the fee of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stoke }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Stoke-on-Tern: 4,8,7) by the Abbot of Haughmond; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 116; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 260b; the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, nos. 583, 595-613, 1353, appendix A i.); Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 271; and 4,3,1 Marchamley note.
\par \tab \tab The main scribe of Great Domesday interlined }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hotune}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  above }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 bereuuich'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , perhaps an early addition as the ink colour
 and pen are the same as in the text below. The lack of rubrication on it is not an indication that it was a late addition, as the names of members of manors were often not rubricated.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ROGER [OF] LACY. The preposition }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is frequently omitted before place-names when part of an individual's name; see Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Old English Bynames}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 126-30. In WOR 2,78 and HEF 24,11 }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Laci}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 rather than }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Laci}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 is similarly interlined above }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Roger}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 ius}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ]. Compare 4,11,4, and, on the omission of 'son of', see 4,1,15 son of note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab STOKE[-ON-TERN]. See 4,8,7.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,8,4\tab PATTON. This was in the Ancient Parish of Stanton Long. In 1086 it was }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 caput }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
of Patton Hundred, and later was in Wenlock Liberty or in Munslow Hundred. Patton had been a holding of Wenlock Abbey but, with Easthope (4,3,1
1), was exchanged in 901 for Stanton Long (4,8,6) and Caughley (see SHR 3c St Milburga note). In the reign of Henry I \'bd hide returned to Wenlock Priory (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 85a) and \'bd
 hide was held under the Hopton family (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 223, 229); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 72; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 41; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 173.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab HERBERT [* OF FURCHES *]. Herbert is probably Herbert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Furcis}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , from Furches in the French d\'e9partement of Calvados (canton Morteaux-Couliboeuf): Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. pp. 44-45; Wightman, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lacy Family}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 154 note; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 249. The same man also appears to have held land in Herefordshire (HEF 1,22. 10,9-10).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 VILLAGER AND 1 RIDER. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 u\'f1 }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 abbreviates }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 unum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
accusative, so it would seem that the villager and rider are the objects of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 h}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 abe}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 t }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
earlier in the line, but unlike the plough and slaves they are probably not governed by }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 In d'nio }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 as it would be very 
unusual for a villager and a rider to be in lordship. Compare 1,8 lordship note and 4,11,4 villagers note. It is possible, however, that }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 u\'f1}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  is a mistake for }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 un' }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (= }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 unus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 nominative) as in 4,8,6 (see 4,8,6 smallholder note).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab A PRIEST. His church was probably at Stanton Long (4,8,6), no Saxon or Norman church being evidenced at Patton; see Lewis, 'Introduction', }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Shropshire Domesday}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 24.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,8,5\tab RUSHBURY. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Patton Hundred in 1086, later in Munslow Hundred, descended with the Lacy barony and was divided among heiresses before being reunited later under the Mortimers. In the }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 963, Stephen de }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Buterle }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and Petronella }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Kenleg' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 hold 1 fee in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rusbur' }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 of the barony of W(alter) }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Lascy}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 972 (4,8,16 Wheathill note); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 70b, 80b; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 194, v. no. 611, vi. no. 54, vii. no. 710, viii. no. 667; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, iv. pp. 229, 245; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 94; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 56.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Rushbury itself only accounted for \'bd hide out of the five; according to the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 70b-71a, the other members were }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Walle sub Eywode }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Wall-under-Heywood SO5192), 1 \'bd hides; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Estwalle }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (East Wall SO5293), 1 hide; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Westwalle }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Wall Bank? SO5092), 1 hide, and }
{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Cot' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Coats SO5292), \'bd hide. The remaining \'bd hide was probably at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wildredehope }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Wilderhope SO5492); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. no. 710; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 55-56.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ODO [* OF BERNIERES *]. See 4,3,9 Odo note. His 5 hides included Wilderhope and part of Rushbury: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 59.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,8,6\tab STANTON [LONG]. This was an Ancient Parish. It was in Patton Hundred in 1086, later in Munslow Hundred. Ten hides at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stantune}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
of which these 3 hides may have been the core, had been granted back to St Milburga's Priory at Wenlock in 901 (SHR 3c St Milburga note), but all trace of a Wenlock interest is missing from Domesday, and only a mill is held later (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 164b). A further 5 hides of this grant will have become the two 1086 manors of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stantune}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  later known as Holdgate (4,21,5-6; see 4
,21,5 Holdgate note).The overlordship was forfeited in 1102 by the rebellion of Earl Roger's son. The mesne lordship of Roger of Lacy had already been confiscated in 1096 and had probably been given to his brother Hugh. The land escheated to the Crown und
er Henry I following Hugh's death and part became a serjeanty. This was held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 72a, by Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Mora }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Longestanton'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 . The Abbot of Haughmond had an interest in a part (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 163b; the Haughmond Cartulary: Ree
s, nos. 688, 730-35) and the Templars were enfeoffed in another, holding of the fee of Castle Holdgate (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 72b, 101a); see 4,21,5 Holdgate note; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 32; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 171.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Cote }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Coates SO5890) was an adjacent serjeanty (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, pp. 6, 383) which had perhaps been separated at an early date from Stanton Long.
\par \tab \tab There was almost certainly a church here, not mentioned in Domesday. The priest given under Patton (4,8,4) probably served 
it. This church may have been the minster for Patton Hundred and for the territory that preceded it unless that church was at Diddlebury, a member of the royal manor of 'Corfham' (4,1,5) on which Patton Hundred depended: \{
Introduction: Ecclesiastical Organization\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab HERBERT [* OF FURCHES *]. See 4,8,4 Herbert note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 SMALLHOLDER. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 u\'f1 bord' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (= }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 unum bordarium}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
accusative, but there is no subject and verb). This is a scribal error for }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 un' bord }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (= }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 unus bordarius}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 nominative).}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,8,7\tab STOKE[-ON-T
ERN]. This was an Ancient Parish, usually known in that capacity as Stoke-upon-Tern. It lay in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. Roger of Lacy held two manors called 'Stoke', the present one under Earl Roger and another 'Stoke' in
 chief from the king (7,5). Both were held under the Lacys in the thirteenth century by the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Say }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
family and both are sometimes called 'Stoke Say', sometimes distinguished from one another as 'North Stoke' and 'South Stoke'. 'North Stoke' or Stoke-on-Tern was also called 'Stoke Lacy'. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 964, Walter }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Say }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds from the barony of Walter }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Lasey }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 3 fees in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Nortstok'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 Sutstok' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wethul' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Wheathill: 4,8,16). In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 55b, John }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Verdon }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stoke }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 by exchange with Hugh }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Say }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 of the fee of Ludlow. It is }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stoke Say }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids
}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 220, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stoke super Tyrne }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 227, and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 North Stoke }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 237; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 964;}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. no. 187, vi. no. 54, vii.
 nos. 83, 710, viii. no. 469, ix. nos. 379, 642.
\par \tab \tab In 1086 Stoke-on-Tern had outliers at Hopton and Little Wytheford (4,8,3;8) which were assessed with it. This process was extended after 1086, for among the members of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stoke Say }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 given in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 220, are a number that were parts of other Lacy holdings in Domesday. These members were: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Alvereton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Ollerton SJ6525); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Eton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Eaton-upon-Tern SJ6523; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. no. 710, x. no. 637); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wystaneswyk }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Wistanswick SJ6629); }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stoke Aubrey }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (an unidentified part of Stoke-on-Tern); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wodehus }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Woodhouse SJ6426); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Heselschauwe }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(Helshaw; see 1,9 'Chatshall'note); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Pethesey }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Petsey SJ6327); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Morton Say }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Moreton Say: 4,8,1 and see 4,8,1 Moreton note); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stuche }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Styche SJ6435; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ix. no. 381); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Blecheleye }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Bletchley SJ6233; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 635, v. no. 104, vi. no. 54, vii. no. 710; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 57b); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Aldeleye }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(Audley Brow SJ6335); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Oldefeld }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Oldfields SJ6236); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hull }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Hill House in Stoke Heath, SJ6529); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Warendeshall }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(Warran SJ6530 or Wardale SJ6729); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Parrok }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Stoke Park SJ6526). See also }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 113; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 59. Of these members, Styche, Bletchley, Audley Brow and Oldfields were no doubt parts of Moreton Say (4,8,1) in 1086.
\par \tab \tab Part of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stoca }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 was given by Theodoric }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Sai }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 to Shrewsbury Abbey; the land was actually at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Burhulla }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(lost): the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. 33, 38, 41).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 7 HIDES [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a space suitable for about six letters after }{\i\f703\cf1\insrsid4139880 vii hid\'ea}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see 1,5 hide note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 3 RIDERS. The main scribe of Great Domesday corrected their number to }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 iii}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  by overwriting.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,8,8\tab [LITTLE] WYTHEFORD. Like Great Wytheford (4,3,4-5. 4,14,2) it l
ay in Shawbury Ancient Parish, but the two Wythefords lay in different hundreds in 1086, Little Wytheford in Wrockwardine Hundred, later in 'Bradford' Hundred, and Great Wytheford in Hodnet Hundred. There is no later connection here with the Lacy family; 
Little Wytheford was annexed to Shawbury (4,23,3) which is adjacent, while it was in the hands of the Crown. Half of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Parva Whetheford' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 was given with Shawbury by King John to Thomas }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
de Erdyngton}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 : }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 115; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, viii. p. 71. For the other half of Little Wytheford, see 4,27,3.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \'bd HIDE. [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a space suitable for about four letters after }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 dimid' hida.}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 1,5 hide note.}
{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ASSESSED IN THE REVENUE OF. The Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 firma }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 here represents the whole of the revenue/}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
income of Stoke-on-Tern (4,8,7) in which the payment of Little Wytheford was included; compare 4,28,4. For other meanings of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 firma}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , see 3d,5 revenue note 4,1,12 revenue note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab STOKE[-ON-TERN]. See 4,8,7.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,8,9\tab [WATERS] UPT
ON. This was an Ancient Parish, also known as Upton Parva. It was in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. It passed from the Lacy barony to that of Wem (descent from William Pandolf: 4,14 William note). In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 964, Walter }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Opton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (whence 'Waters', as in Bridgwater, Somerset) holds 1 fee in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Opton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
of the barony of Wem. The place is }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hopton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 58a, and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Upton Waters }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 237; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 972; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, viii. p. 52; and 4,14,4 Wem note. The church of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Upton Parva }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Waters Upton) was subject to St Guthlac's of Hereford; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 245a; Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 57.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab SIWARD }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 [* THE FAT *]. On the possibility that he was the same person as Siward [the fat], on whom see 4,27,32 Siward note, see 4,1,34 Siward note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab GAMAL. The Domesday forms of this name - }{\i\insrsid4139880 Gamel}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Game}{\insrsid4139880  - represent Old Norse }{\i\insrsid4139880 Gamall}{\insrsid4139880 , Old Danish }{\i\insrsid4139880 
Gamal}{\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\insrsid4139880 
, pp. 257-58. In some of the Phillimore printed translations this name appears as Gamal, and in others as Gamall; these have now been standardized as the Old Danish form. The Alecto edition has Gamal.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 3 HIDES [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a space suitable for about six letters after }{\i\f703\cf1\insrsid4139880 iii hid\'ea}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see 1,5 hide note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,8,10\tab CORFTON. It was in Diddlebury Ancient Parish. It lay in "Culvestan" Hundred in 1086, later in Munslow Hundred. It descended in the Lacy family, being held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 964, as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Corfton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 by William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Forches }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from the barony of Walter }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Lasey}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 But in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 70b, only 2 hides are held by William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Furches }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from the heirs of Walter }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Lascy}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 the other hide being divided between Hugh }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Patiton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holding from Walter }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Hopton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
and the prior of Wenlock holding from William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Furc'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 972; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 223, 245; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 194; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 44; and 4,1,6 St Peter note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab HERBERT [* OF FURCHES *]. See 4,8,4 Herbert note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ALSI. }{\insrsid4139880 The Domesday forms of the name-form Alsi - }{\i\insrsid4139880 Alsi}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Alsius}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Elsi}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Aelsi}{
\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Alsicus}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Alsidus}{\insrsid4139880  etc. - could represent Old English }{\i\insrsid4139880 \'c6lfsige}{\insrsid4139880 , Old English }{\i\insrsid4139880 \'c6thelsige}{
\insrsid4139880  or perhaps Old English }{\i\insrsid4139880 Ealdsige}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Ealhsige}{\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\insrsid4139880 , pp. 151-52, under }{
\i\insrsid4139880 Al-sige}{\insrsid4139880 , see also p. 142, under }{\i\insrsid4139880 Al-}{\insrsid4139880 . JRM followed von Feilitzen in keeping to the base form, but preferred the second element -si for the Old English }{\i\insrsid4139880 -sige}{
\insrsid4139880 , as that is what is found in the vast majority of instances in Domesday. The Alecto edition has Alsige. However, in some of the Phillimore printed translations the forms Alfsi and Alfsige appear for people who in the present edition 
are now rendered Alsi because the forms of their names lack an }{\i\insrsid4139880 -f-}{\insrsid4139880  or }{\i\insrsid4139880 -v- }{\insrsid4139880 
which JRM thought was necessary for it to be included under Alfsi (a few of them appear in von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\insrsid4139880 , p. 180, under Old English }{\i\insrsid4139880 \'c6lfsige}{
\insrsid4139880 , and on pp. 187-88, under Old English }{\i\insrsid4139880 \'c6thelsige}{\insrsid4139880 ). The Alecto edition has Alsige for those that appear there under Old English }{\i\insrsid4139880 \'c6lfsige}{\insrsid4139880 .}{\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab HEDGED ENCLOSURE FOR CAPTURING ROE-DEER. Three such enclosures are also recorded at Lingen (6,14). Compare WOR 18,4 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 i haia in qua capiebantur ferae}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
: '1 hedged enclosure where wild animals were caught'), HEF 29,16 ('there is a hedged enclosure in which he may keep what he can catch') and CHS 1,1 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 ii haiae capreolorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 :}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 '2 deer enclosures'); see 3c,2 enclosures note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,8,11\tab MIDDLEHOPE. Like Corfton (4,8,10), it was in Diddlebury Ancient Parish. It was in "Culvestan" Hundred in 1086, then in Munslow Hundred. The two vills had the same descent from the1086 holder Herbert to the }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Furchis }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 family under the Lacys. In the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 71a, William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Midelhop' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Midelhop' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Furc'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , but there is no mention of the Lacy overlordship; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 194, x. no. 618; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 51.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab HERBERT [* OF FURCHES *]. See 4,8,4 Herbert note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a space suitable for about seven letters after the population, rather small for the later insertion of any resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,8,12\tab 
IN LEINTWARDINE HUNDRED. If this heading is correct, Plaish will have been a detached part of Leintwardine Hundred, lying adjacent to a detached part of "Culvestan" hundred. It is possible that like the erroneous insertions of headings for Baschurch Hundr
e
d (4,9,1. 4,11,5. 7,1), the scribe has mechanically inserted the name of the next hundred that appears in the standard sequence. On the other hand, Leintwardine Hundred is split into two further parts and it may be that it was carved out of a large royal 
estate from which the hundreds of Patton and "Culvestan" were also created. The untidiness of the boundaries would reflect a division partly on tenurial lines. See \{Introduction: Hundreds\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab PLAISH. It lay in Cardington Ancient Parish. If the hundred head i
s not an error (4,8,12 Leintwardine note), Plaish will have been in 1086 an isolated part of Leintwardine Hundred while Cardington (4,3,44) was in a detachment of "Culvestan" Hundred; both places were later in Munslow Hundred. Plaish had the same descent 
as Higford (4,8,15) descending in the Lacy barony, then passing to Fitz Alan when William Fitz Alan married the daughter of Hugh of Lacy. In both places the undertenants are the de Higfords. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 222, Walter }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Springthus }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Plese }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in Munslow Hundred from Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Le}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 Roger holds from Geoffrey }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Grete}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Geoffrey holds from William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Hugsford }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
who holds from Richard Fitz Alan; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 229; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 7 la; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 353.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Plaish is one of the few Shropshire places represented in Saxon charters: in 963 King Edgar had granted to his thane Wulfric 6 }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 mansae }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Plesc }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Plaish) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Eastun }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Church Aston; see 4,1,23 Edgmond note): }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Early Charters of the West Midlands}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , no. 431 p. 149 (= Sawyer, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , no. 723). The Plaish estate will have included Chatshall and Broome. Chatshall was a part of Cardington (4,3,44) in 1086 and Broome was a separate estate (4,28,1): }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. pp. 29-30. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Eastun}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  has been identified as Church and Chetwynd Aston, but a detailed study of the bounds show that they are only those of Church Aston: }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 26. However, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 125, is less certain that }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Plesc}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 is Plaish.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab BERN
ER <OF HIGFORD>. He is probably the same man as Roger of Lacy's subtenant at Higford (4,8,15), who had also succeeded Godwin; also the same as the Berner who was subtenant of William Pandolf (4,14,22-23). These manors all passed to the de Higford family. 
See Lewis, 'Introduction', }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Shropshire Domesday}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 19; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 167. He is probably the same person as the Berner who held land from Roger of Lacy in Herefordshire (HEF 10,22-23).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,8,13\tab BITTERLEY. This was an Ancient Parish. In 1086 and later, it lay in 'Overs' Hundred. It descended in the Lacy family, being held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 963, as }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Buterle}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , 1 fee held by Stephen }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Buturle }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 of the barony of W(alter) }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Lasey}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 . It is held from Margery }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Laci }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 74b, and from Theobald }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Verdon }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 216; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 972; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 234, 243; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. no. 54, vii. no. 710; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 80b; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 367. A mill there was early given to Haughmond Abbey: the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, nos. 204-206).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,8,14\tab FORTON. It lay in Montford Ancient Parish. In 1086 it was in Baschurch Hundred, later in Pimhill Hundred. It 
seems to have followed the same descent as Montford itself (4,4,23 Montford note) from Roger of Lacy to Fitz Alan and to have become a member of Montford: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Manford }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Montford: 4,4,23) and }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Fortone }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 are given with }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Nesse }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Little Ness: 4,3,52) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Serewardin }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Shr
awardine: 4,3,50) in the Inquisition on the death of John Fitz Alan (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 812). In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 215, it is listed independently in Pimhill Hundred; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 600; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, vii. p. 252, x. pp. 98, 126, 129.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,8,15\tab [IN "ALNODESTREU" HUNDRED]. The heading is supplied from geographical probability and from the fact that Stockton in whose parish Higford lay is in a group of places in "Alnodestreu" Hundred at 4,23,18.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab HIGFORD. It lay in Stockton Ancient Parish; it was probably in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086, later in Brimstree Hundred. It followed the same descent as Plaish (4,8,12) passing from the Lacys to Fitz Alan: in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 962, Walter }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Huggeford }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Huggeford }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
with members from the barony of John Fitz Alan. These members are said by }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 226, to be }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Norton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Norton SJ7200), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Appeleg }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Apley SO7199) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Astewall }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Astol SJ7300); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 971, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, iv. pp. 234, 243; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 10. It is possible that another member, though remoter, was }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bolinghall }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Boningale SJ8102), held in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 226, by the Abbot of Lilleshall from William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Huggefford}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 261a; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 264.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab BERNER <OF HIGFORD> HOLDS ... GODWIN HELD. See 4,8,12 Berner note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,8,16\tab WHEATHILL. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Waltham. }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 It was an Ancient Parish. In 1086 it lay in 'Conditre' Hundred, later in Stottesdon Hundred. It 
descended in the Lacy barony and was held under the Lacys by the de Says: in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 964, Walter }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Say }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Nortstok'}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Sotstok' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Stoke-on-Tern and Stokesay; see 4,8,7 Stoke note and 7,5 Stokesay note) and in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wethul' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from the barony of W(alter) }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Lasey. }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 It is coupled with Rushbury (4,8,5) in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 972; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 218, 231, 242; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. no. 522; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 283.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 3 HIDES [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a space suitable for about five letters after }{\i\f703\cf1\insrsid4139880 iii hid\'ea}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see 1,5 hide note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank two-thirds of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,9\tab ROBERT SON OF THEOBALD. }{\insrsid4139880 He came from Avoine, in the French d\'e9partement of Orne (arrondissement Argentan, canton Ecouch\'e9
). He held from Earl Roger in Sussex and in Shropshire. In Sussex he was Earl Roger's principal tenant (SUS 11), if }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 mo
st or all of the references to plain Robert are to Robert son of Theobald, and was Roger's sheriff in his Rape of Arundel. For that reason, he was also}{\insrsid4139880 
 known as Robert of Arundel in his deeds of gift Lewes Priory. When the house of Montgomery forfeited its
 lands in 1102 (see SHR 4 Roger note), Robert's land, then presumably held by his son Hugh, escheated to the Crown. With the exception of Shifnal (4,9,1), what had been Robert's lands later formed the honour of Petworth (Sussex) under the lords of Arundel
. }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 See Round, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Documents, France}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. l-li, and nos. 655-656 p. 233; Mason, 'Officers and Clerks',}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 pp. 244-45; Keats-Rohan, }{
\i\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\insrsid4139880 , p. 386.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab The hundredal order of this sub-chapter is as follows (the bracketed numbers are explained in SHR 4 arrangement note):
\par \tab \tab 4,9,1-2 ["Alnodestreu"] Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,9,3-4 Wrockwardine Hundred
\par \tab At 4,9,1 Domesday has an erroneous Baschurch hundred head.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,9,1\tab IN BASCHURCH HUNDRED. [* IN "ALNODESTREU" HUNDRED *]. There seems to be no reason why Shifnal and Kembe
rton (4,9,2) should be attached to Baschurch Hundred from which they are remote. It is likely that the wrong hundred was inserted and should have been "Alnodestreu", as is probably also the case at 4,11,5 and 7,1. The main scribe of Great Domesday very pr
obably mechanically inserted the name of the next hundred in the standard sequence, even though the fief-holder had no estates there: \{Introduction: Hundreds\}.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab SHIFNAL. The place was an Ancient Parish; it no doubt lay in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086, later in Brimstree Hundred. According to two charters regarded as fabricated, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Scuffanhalch }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 together with }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Costesford }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Cosford in Albrighton: 4,11,10), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wecelleburne }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Wattlesborough: 4,4,16) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lusgerde }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Lizard Hill SJ7709) had been granted by Wulfhere, King of the Mercians, to St Peter's Church at Peterborough ostensibly in 664 and again by Ethelred, King of the Mercians supposedly in 680: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Early Charters of the West Midlands}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 147 nos. 426-47 (= Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , nos. 68, 72); see the Anglo-Saxon C
hronicle (version E) for 675. No trace of the Peterborough interest is found in later times, nor of the grant by Wiglaf of land at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Iddeshale}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  to the minster at Hanbury in Worcestershire: }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Early Charters of the West Midlands}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 101 no. 247 (= Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, no. 190). Lizard, part of Shifnal or of Tong (4,1,24), was later held by the Abbot of Lilleshall: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 261a.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The Domesday name-form is }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Iteshale}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 . The 1086 and modern forms have different origins, Iddi's }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 halh }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and Scuffa's }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 halh }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 respectively, but seem to have co-existed. The forms }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Scuffanhalch }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Shoffenhale }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
are found in the above-mentioned charter-grants. The charters are post-Conquest forgeries, but these spellings seem to be pre-Conquest. This gift is referred to as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Shuffenhale }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle (version E) for 675. 'Idsall' is the predominant medieval name. However, the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Iddeshale}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 of the 836 charter of King Wiglaf cited above is probably not Shifnal, but a lost Worcestershire place; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 265 note 1; Ekwall, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Dictionary of English Placenames}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , under Shifnal and Idsall; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. pp. 263-64.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab From Robert the lands passed to King Henry I and were granted by him to Alan }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de}{\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Dunstanville}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , lord of Castle Combe in Wiltshire. }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hideshale }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is held from the mother of Walter }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Dunstanville }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in the Red Book of the Exchequer (Hall, ii. p. 509), and by Walter himself (as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Ideshale}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 966. The tenant in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 234, is Bartholomew }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Badelesmere}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 243.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Robert gave the church and tithes to Shrewsbury Abbey: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. xix, 6, 34, 39, 42, 64, 256, 261, 297-98, 300, 342-43).}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Members of Shifnal will certainly have been }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hemme }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hinynton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (The Hem SJ7305 and Hinnington SJ7404) held by Bartholomew }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Badelesmere }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, vii. no. 104; see v. no. 188, vii. no. 104, viii. no. 185, x. no. 639. It is probable that The Wyke (SJ7306), 'Trilwardyne', Priorslee (SJ71
09, held by the Canons of Wombridge), 'Knowle' (now represented by Knowl Wood and Knowlbank SJ7208), The Woodhouse (SJ7210), Haughton (SJ7408), Stanton (SJ7707) and Upton (SJ7506) were also members: Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire
}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 265-337. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 La Wodehouus }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is held by Bartholomew }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Badelesmere }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. no. 104. Another possible member was Evelith (see 4,19,9 Moreton note), also }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Grenhul }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Grindle SJ7503), held by Bartholomew }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Badelesmere }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. no. 104; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 90.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Earl Morcar also held the adjacent Tong (4,1,24) before 1066.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab There was a superior church here, not mentioned in Domesday; see \{Introduction: Ecclesiastical Organization\}.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab EARL MORCAR. Farley printed an abbreviation line over the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 m }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 of the interlined }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 com}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
although there is not one in the manuscript (presumably because of the closeness of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 com }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 to the hundred head above). See 2,2 plough note for other examples of Farley 'correcting' the reading in the manuscript.}
{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining half a line after the woodland detail, perhaps for the later insertion of other resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,9,2\tab KEMBERTON. This was an Ancient Parish. In 1086 it probably lay in "Alnodestreu" Hundred and was later in Brimstree. After falling to the Crown, Kemberton was held by Adeliza }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Louvain }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 as part of the barony of Arundel; see Sanders, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 English Baronies}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 2; 4,1 Roger note). She was King Henry I's widow and subsequently married William (II) }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Albini 
}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Aubigny) who was created Earl of Arundel in 1176. Adeliza and William granted the subordinate honour of Petworth to Adeliza's brother, Jocelyn }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Lovain}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 and it subsequently went to the de Percy family holding under the Fitz Alans who came to hold a quarter of the barony by marriage. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 962, William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
de Alta Ripa }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Kembricton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from the barony of John Fitz Alan; the former holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Kembirton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from Henry }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Percy }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 226; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 234, 244; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 245a; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 1.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The tithes of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Cambristona }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 were given by Robert son of Theobald to Shrewsbury Abbey: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. xix, 34, 39, 42, etc.).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,9,3\tab WOODCOTE. This formerly lay in Sheriffhales Ancient Parish which was divided between Shropshire (Wrockwardine, later 'Bradford', Hundred) and Staffordshire (Cuttlestone Hundred). The portion that included 
Woodcote lay in Wrockwardine Hundred in Shropshire 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. Woodcote later became a separate Civil Parish, lying entirely in Shropshire.
\par \tab \tab Like Kemberton (4,9,2) it passed to the honour of Petworth. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 55b, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wodecot}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
3 hides, is held of the fee of Henry }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Persy}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 whilst in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 220, William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Randulfe }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wodecote }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Eye }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Eye farm SJ6005; see 4,9,4 manor note) from Henry }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Percy}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 227; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. no. 309; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 112; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 11.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 3 HIDES [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a space suitable for about four letters after }{\i\f703\cf1\insrsid4139880 iii hid\'ea}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see 1,5 hide note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a quarter of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,9,4\tab THIS ENTRY was squeezed into the space left at the end of Robert'
s subtenancy by the the main scribe of Great Domesday; the pen he used is quite different from the one he had used for the rest of this sub-chapter and the ink is slightly paler. His use of the 'Land for' plough estimate formula also suggests a later addi
tion; see 3d,7 entry note. This entry was probably added at the same time as C14.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab THIS UNIDENTIFIED MANOR of 1 virgate which lay in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086 was probably at Eye in the Ancient Parish of Eaton Constantine. Eye followed the same descent a
s Woodcote and Kemberton; see 4,9,3 Woodcote note; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 16.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab THEY HAVE NOTHING. This probably means they have no ploughs, as the villagers' land-holding is not recorded in Shropshire. See 4,14,15 smallholder note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,10\tab RANULF PEVEREL. }{\insrsid4139880 He was a Norman from Vengeons in the French d\'e9
partement of Manche (arrondissement Avranches, canton Sourdeval). There were several Peverels active in England in 1086, but no evidence of any close link between them; nonetheless, unless the ni
ckname Peverel arose separately in different localities, there is probably some unfound kinship between them. If so, then Ranulf }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 was probably a relative of William Peverel of Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire}{\insrsid4139880 . }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 Ranulf was succeeded by his son William Peverel of Essex, but this small fief probably escheated to the Crown under King Henry I or Henry II and was granted out to different lords; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 104-105, vi. p. 310; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\insrsid4139880 , p. 355.
\par \tab \tab Peverel is from Old French }{\i\insrsid4139880 Peurel}{\insrsid4139880 , Latin }{\i\insrsid4139880 piperellus}{\insrsid4139880 , diminutive of }{\i\insrsid4139880 piper}{\insrsid4139880  ('pepper'). The diminutive suffix -}{\i\insrsid4139880 
ellus}{\insrsid4139880  could mean 'small' or be affectionate 'sweet little'. If peppercorn is meant, the reference could be to Ranulf's rotundity or his dark hair or features; see Tengvik, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Old English Bynames}{\insrsid4139880 
, p. 326. Reaney, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Dictionary of British Surnames}{\insrsid4139880 , under Peverall suggests that the reference might also be to a character trait: ' a small man with a fiery, peppery temper'. See also }{\i\insrsid4139880 
VCH Nottinghamshire}{\insrsid4139880 , i. p 228; Sanders, }{\i\insrsid4139880 English Baronies}{\insrsid4139880 , p. 136; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\insrsid4139880 , p. 494.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab The hundredal order of this sub-chapter is as follows (the bracketed numbers are explained in SHR 4 arrangement note):
\par \tab \tab 4,10,1 Condover Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,10,2-4 Hodnet Hundred}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,10,1\tab CRE
SSAGE. This was formerly a township of Cound Ancient Parish, and is now its own Civil Parish. It lay in Condover Hundred in 1086 and later. The overlordship of the manor passed to Hugh of Lacy by 1180, then ultimately to Maud of Lacy (SHR 7 Roger note) wh
o was wife of Geoffrey }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Geneville }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
and whose granddaughter Joan brought it to Roger Mortimer, Earl of March, by 1308. From the subtenant Ranulf Peverel, it passed to William Peverel of Essex and was forfeited to the Crown by 1130. By 1180 the tenancy had p
assed to a branch of the de Lacys, relatives of the overlord. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 215, Adam }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Lacy }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Cristerdech }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 from Geoffrey }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Genevill }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and his wife Maud; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 229, and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. no. 344, where it}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is held of the manor of Stanton Lacy (7,4). The Abbot of Buildwas had a short-term interest here: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, ii. pp. 62b, 92a. On the whole manor, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 308; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 74.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,10,2\tab LACON. The Domesday name-form is }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lack}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
. The place was a township of Wem Ancient Parish, and was in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. About 1130 it appears to have fallen to the Crown and was subsequently added to Soulton (3e,2) which was adjacent an
d belonged to the Church of St Michael in or close to Shrewsbury Castle. In the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 121, John }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Laken }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Laken }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 from Robert Corbet who holds from the King's Chapel in Shrewsbury Castle; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv.}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 p. 220; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquiti
es of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 352.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ALNOTH. }{\insrsid4139880 The Domesday forms of the name-form Alnoth - }{\i\insrsid4139880 Alnod}{\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\insrsid4139880 us}{\insrsid4139880 ), }{\i\insrsid4139880 Elnod}{\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\insrsid4139880 us}{
\insrsid4139880 ),}{\i\insrsid4139880  Aelnod}{\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\insrsid4139880 us}{\insrsid4139880 ),}{\i\insrsid4139880  Alnot}{\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\insrsid4139880 us}{\insrsid4139880 ),}{\i\insrsid4139880  Alnoth}{\insrsid4139880 (}{
\i\insrsid4139880 us}{\insrsid4139880 ),}{\i\insrsid4139880  Alnoht}{\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\insrsid4139880  Elnoc}{\insrsid4139880  (an error for }{\i\insrsid4139880 Elnot}{\insrsid4139880 ) etc. - could represent Old English }{\i\insrsid4139880 \'c6
lfnoth, }{\insrsid4139880 Old English }{\i\insrsid4139880 \'c6thelnoth}{\insrsid4139880 , or the hypothetical Old English}{\i\insrsid4139880  Ealdnoth}{\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{
\insrsid4139880 , pp. 149-50, under }{\i\insrsid4139880 Al-noth}{\insrsid4139880 , and see also p. 142, under }{\i\insrsid4139880 Al-}{\insrsid4139880 . JRM followed von Feilitzen in keeping to the base form, Alnoth, but some of the people he ca
lled Alnoth, followed in the present edition, appear in von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\insrsid4139880 , pp. 175, 185-86, 241, under Old English }{\i\insrsid4139880 \'c6lfnoth, }{\insrsid4139880 
Old English}{\i\insrsid4139880  \'c6thelnoth}{\insrsid4139880  and Old English}{\i\insrsid4139880  Ealdnoth}{\insrsid4139880 , but their Domesday forms do not include the }{\i\insrsid4139880 -f-}{\insrsid4139880 
 that JRM required for a person to be called Alfnoth (his version of Old English }{\i\insrsid4139880 \'c6lfnoth}{\insrsid4139880 ), the }{\i\insrsid4139880 -d-}{\insrsid4139880  or }{\i\insrsid4139880 -g- }{\insrsid4139880 
that warranted its inclusion under Old English }{\i\insrsid4139880 \'c6thelnoth}{\insrsid4139880 , or the }{\i\insrsid4139880 -t-}{\insrsid4139880  necessary for its rendering as Aldnoth (his version of Old English }{\i\insrsid4139880 Ealdnoth}{
\insrsid4139880 ; but see NFK 1,109 Alnoth note). JMcND accepted this. The Alecto edition follows von Feilitzen.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,10,3\tab WESTON[-UNDER-REDCASTLE]. This was formerly a township of Hodnet Ancient Parish and is now its own Civil Parish. It lay in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, and wa
s later in 'Bradford' Hundred. By 1130 the land appears to have escheated to the Crown, then was given in 1175 to Guy Lestrange. On his death it went to his two sisters and then both halves in various ways to Henry }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Audley. }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 It descended in the Audley fam
ily and was held from the Mortimers in the later thirteenth century. The land included 'Redcliff' on which the Audleys had their castle, probably established in the first half of the thirteenth century; see King, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Castellarium Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 429. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 57b, John }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Aldithel' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds 4 \'bd hides in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Weston'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 half from Richard }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Harecurt }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and half from Madoc }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Sutton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in exchange for }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stanwey }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Stanway: 4,3,9); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 222; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 97. The }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 117, gives the members as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wexhill' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Whixall: 4,10,4) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Chirbere }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(Chirbury Hill and Wood in Kenstone, SJ5928) held from Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Mortuomari }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 of his barony of Burford. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 536 (of
 Nicholas }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Aldithele}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ),}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 there is a longer list of the members which included }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wykeshull}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 Cheseburi}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Lakene }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Lacon: 4,10,2), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Weston}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Hauekeston }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Hawkstone SJ5829), }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Marchumley }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Marchamley: 4,3,1) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Kentenesden }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Kenstone SJ5928; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, ii. no. 285) held of the heirs of Maud Lestrange.}{\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rubeum Castrum }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Redcastle SJ5729) was also a member; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, ii. nos. 196, 476, v. no. 62, vi. no. 56.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab On the whole manor, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 341.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab EDRIC THE WILD. See 4,1,14 Edric note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a third of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,10,4\tab 
WHIXALL. This was formerly an area in Prees Ancient Parish, but is now its own Civil Parish. It was in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. It followed the same descent as Weston (4,10,3) and is sometimes found coupled with it. In }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 58b, William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Lake }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds \'bd hide in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wickeshall }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from James }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
de Audith}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 while in the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 116, William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Laken }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wekeshall' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from Nicholas }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Audeley' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 as a member of the latter's manor of Weston; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, iv. pp. 221, 227; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 348.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ALDGYTH <OF WELSHAMPTON>. See 4,3,49 Aldgyth note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab A FREE WOMAN. Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 homo }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 can in theory apply to either sex: in HRT 5,16;20 Edeva and Saehild, both females, are each described a
s the 'man' of some magnate. See CAM 13,1 Goda note. However, the main scribe of Great Domesday may simply have repeated the formula }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 7 liber homo fuit }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
mechanically. In 4,14,3 Aelfeva is correctly described as a }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 libera femina}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 as also in ESS 90,20; see also 'Aldgyth, a free woman (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
libera femina}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 )'}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in SUF 67,15. SUF 74,6.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,11\tab RALPH OF MORTIMER. He also held in chief in Shropshire (SHR 6). For biographical details, see SHR 6 Ralph note.
\par \tab \tab He appears to have assumed the overlordship of these lands after 1102 and joined them to the fief that he held in chief from the king (SHR 6 Ralph note).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab The hundredal order of this sub-chapter is as follows (the bracketed numbers are explained in SHR 4 arrangement note):
\par \tab \tab 4,11,1 Condover Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,11,2-3 "Culvestan" Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,11,4 'Overs' Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,11,5-10 ["Alnodestreu"] Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,11,11-16 'Conditre' Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,11,17-18 Wrockwardine Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,11,19 [Hodnet] Hundred.
\par \tab 
The beginning of this chapter is in the standard sequence. The last three entries (4,11,17-19) are out of sequence and there is no reason to think that they were postscriptal entries in Domesday, but there is a strong suspicion that they were not holdings
 of Ralph of Mortimer; see 4,11,17 Ralph note. At 4,11,5 Domesday has an erroneous Baschurch hundred head.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,11,1\tab SHEINTON. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Condover Hundred in 1086 and later, then in the Liberty of Cleobury Mortimer. The entry is dupl
icated at 6,32, though with less detail, in the fief that Ralph of Mortimer holds directly from the king: the exact nature of the tenure must have been unclear to the main scribe of Great Domesday or to the compilers of the circuit volume. The overlordshi
p continued with the Mortimers; thus in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 62b, Hugh }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Seynton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds 2 hides in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Seynton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
from Roger Mortimer; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 91b; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 963, 972; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, iv. pp. 215, 232, 247; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. no. 235. The lords of Castle Holdgate (descent from Helgot, the 1086 subtenant; see 4,21 Helgot note) also retained an interest here: Eyton, }
{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 214.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab AZUR. On this name, see 4,1,35 Azur note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab HELGOT <OF HOLDGATE>. The Helgot who holds from Ralph of Mortimer (4,11,1;9. 6,27;29;32) is no doubt the same as the man who holds directly from Earl Roger (4,21; see 4,21 Helgot note); see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 318.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab SAEWULF <OF SHEINTON>. }{\insrsid4139880 The Domesday forms of this name - }{\i\insrsid4139880 Saulf}{\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\insrsid4139880 us}{\insrsid4139880 ), }{\i\insrsid4139880 Saul}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 
Seulf}{\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\insrsid4139880  Saolf}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Saolt}{\insrsid4139880  - represent Old English }{\i\insrsid4139880 Saewulf}{\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid4139880 
Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\insrsid4139880 , p. 355. The Alecto edition also has Saewulf.
\par \tab \tab The}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  only other occurrence of this name in Domesday Shropshire is in the duplicate entry at 6,32 (see 4,11,1 Sheinton note).}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab }{\insrsid4139880 Since the nearest other holding was over 60 miles away, of modest value, and without tenurial associations, this was probably to only property of Saewulf (JP).}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 4,11,2\tab HUNTINGTON. 
It now lies in the Civil Parish of Ashford Carbonell. Ashford Carbonell itself was a chapelry of the Ancient Parish of Little Hereford, the only part of the parish to lie in Shropshire, the rest being in Herefordshire. Huntington was in "Culvestan" Hundre
d
 in 1086, later in Munslow Hundred. The overlordship of both manors continued with the Mortimer family, the undertenancy of the first going to the de Lingen family named from Lingen (6,14) which was also held by a "Turstin" under Ralph of Mortimer in 1086
. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 70a, John }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Lingenie }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Huntiton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Mortuomar
}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 100b; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 73.
\par \tab \tab The second manor seems actually to have lain at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Asford Superior }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ('Ashford Jones' SO5271) where John son of Reginald holds 1 \'bd hides from Simon }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Burleg' }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 70a. This place is }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Ascheford Jones }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (said to be in 'Overs' Hundred) in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 243, held of the fee of Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Mortuo Mari}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 100b; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 963; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, v. p. 79. 'Ashford Jones', now Ashford House, lay about a mile north-west of Ashford Carbonell, according to the map of Emmanuel Bowen (1724) and the first edition Ordnance Survey one-inch map (sheet 55 of 1832, reprint sheet 50 of 1970); see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 20.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab "TURSTIN" <OF HUNTINGTON>. }{\insrsid4139880 It is not clear what name is represented by the Domesday form of this 1086 holder, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Turstin}{\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\insrsid4139880 us}{\insrsid4139880 
]. The name is not mentioned in Forssner, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Continental-Germanic Personal Names in England}{\insrsid4139880 . Dauzat, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Dictionnaire des Noms et Pr\'e9noms de France}{\insrsid4139880 , states that }{
\lang1036\langfe2057\langnp1036\insrsid4139880 Tostain, Toustain are the archaic forms of the Norman names }{\i\lang1036\langfe2057\langnp1036\insrsid4139880 Totain}{\lang1036\langfe2057\langnp1036\insrsid4139880 ,}{
\i\lang1036\langfe2057\langnp1036\insrsid4139880  Toutain}{\lang1036\langfe2057\langnp1036\insrsid4139880 , deriving from the Nordic baptismal name }{\i\lang1036\langfe2057\langnp1036\insrsid4139880 Thor-steinn}{\insrsid4139880 . Thors
teinn is the Old Norse form of the Old Danish }{\i\insrsid4139880 Thorsten}{\insrsid4139880 , used here for the }{\i\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\insrsid4139880 
 holders (called Thurstan in the printed Phillimore edition), but has come into England by a different route, not directly from Scandinavia, but via Normandy, though retaining the medial }{\i\insrsid4139880 -r-}{\insrsid4139880 
. The printed Phillimore edition has Thurstan, but this has been altered here to "Turstin". The Alecto edition generally has Turstin for the 1086 holders, though Thorsten for STS 12,31.
\par \tab \tab }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 The "Turstin" who held under Ralph of Mortimer (4,11,2. 6,14-15) was identified as "Turstin"of Wigmore (alias "Turstin" of Flanders), by Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, xi. p. 343, followed by }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 289. However, this ancestor of the family de Lingen, is probably a different person: Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 435.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 4 PLOUGHMEN. The main scribe of Great Domesday originally wrote }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iiii serui}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  and then he underlined the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 serui }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 for deletion and inserted }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 bouar' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 above it. See 1,8 ploughmen note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,11,3\tab THERE. Latin }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ibidem }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 refers to Huntington (4,11,2), not to "Culvestan" Hundred. Had the latter been intended, the main scrib
e of Great Domesday would have written }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in eod}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 em}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Hund}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 redo}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 as in 1,4 and 4,9,4.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab RICHARD <OF BRAMPTON>. The several occurrences of a Richard holding under Ralph of Mortimer (4,11,3;14. 6,5-6;9;23-26) may refer to the same individual; see 6,23 Richard note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a quarter of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,11,4\tab CAYNHAM. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in 'Overs' Hundred in 1086 and later. The 4 hides of lordship were given as part of the endowment of Wigmore Abbey: thus in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 74b, in 'Overs' Hundred, the Abbot of Wigmore has 4 hides in alms from Roger }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Mortuomari}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 232 (in Stottesdon Hundred), the Abbot of Wigmore holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Syveton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Snitton SO5575) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Kynham}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 103b; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 164b, 166b; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 349; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii. p. 202.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab It is likely that the other 4 hides, which did not go to Wigmore, included 1 hide in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hope Baghod }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Hope Bagot SO5874) held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 74b, by Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Baghard }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Mortuomari }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 'Overs' Hundred; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 103b; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 963, 973; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 243; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. no. 235. A further hide lay in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hintes }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Hints SO6175) held from the same Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Mortuomari }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 74b; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 103b; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 965, 973; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 243; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. no. 235.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab On the whole manor, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 360.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 4 PACKLOADS OF SALT FROM DROITWICH. See 4,1,25 salt-houses note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab IN THE WHOLE MANOR, LAND FOR 19 PLOUGHS. That is, in the subtenancies of Robert, Walter and Ralph as well as in the main holding.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ROBERT [OF] VESSEY. Vessey is a place-name not a personal name, so Latin }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  has been omitted. Compare 4,8,3 Roger note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab }{\insrsid4139880 He perhaps came from Vessey in the French d\'e9partement of Manche (arrondissement Avranches, canton Pontorson). He held land in Domesday both }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
as a tenant-in-chief and as a subtenant. }{\insrsid4139880 Most of his tenancy in chief was incorporated in the Earldom of Warwick at its creation }{\i\insrsid4139880 c}{\insrsid4139880 . 1088. See }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 117-18; Lewis, \lquote Introduction\rquote , }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Shropshire Domesday}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 18; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , }{
\insrsid4139880 p. 382.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 4 VILLAGERS AND 4 SMALLHOLDERS. Latin }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 vill' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 bord' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 may abbreviate the accusative }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 uillanos }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 bordarios }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and so be the objects of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 h}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 abe}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 nt }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (though probably not governed by }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 In d'nio) }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
earlier in the line. Compare 1,8 lordship note and 4,8,4 villager note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,11,5\tab IN BASCHURCH HUNDRED. [* IN "ALNODESTREU" HUNDRED *]. It is likely that here, as in 4,9,1 and 7,1, the main scribe of G
reat Domesday has put a Baschurch hundred head in error for one for "Alnodestreu". He very probably mechanically inserted the name of the next hundred in the standard sequence, even though the fief-holder had no estates there: \{Introduction: Hundreds\}.}
{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab TH
ERE IS A HOLE in the manuscript at the top of folio 257a which has been repaired from the other side of the folio (see 4,16,2 thanes note). As it occupies the space where the hundred head is normally written, this had to be written on the left side. The m
ain scribe of Great Domesday had to write }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 lib' h\'f4 }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 round the bottom part of the hole (the top of the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 b' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
disappearing into it), but Farley did not indicate the gap thus caused.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab EUDON [GEORGE]. This place lay in Chetton Ancient Parish. Like Eudon Burnell (4,3,61) it probably lay in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086 and was later in Stottesdon Hundred and the Liberty of Cleobury Mortimer. In }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 81b, William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Sancto Georg'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Robert }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Corbet }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and Geoffrey }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Overton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hold 8 virgates (i.e. the 2 hides of Domesday) between them with service at Wigmore. In }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 963, 972, William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Sancto Georgio }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 1 fee in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Nene }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(Neen Savage: 6,6-7) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Eudon' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of the barony of Ralph of Mortimer, while }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Neen Savage }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Eudon }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 are held together in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 246. Eudon had been held by Edric (the wild) and both were held in the twelfth century by the Savage family under the Mortimers; see}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii p. 108a; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 232; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iii. pp. 48, 51, iv. p. 272; Purton, 'Manors of Eudon Burnell and Eudon George'; and 4,11,16 Overton note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab EDRIC [* THE WILD *]. The descent of this manor suggests the identification of this Edric; see 4,1,14 Edric note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a quarter of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of a resource; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,11,6\tab CHELMARSH. This was an Ancient Parish
. It seems to have lain in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086 (4,11,5 Baschurch note) later in Stottesdon Hundred. It appears to have been an early grant to St Milburga's Priory (SHR 3c St Milburga note) and will probably have formed a unit with Deuxhill and E
a
rdington, the former of which survived in the priory's hands, the latter being exchanged for Millichope (see 4,1,32 St Milburga note and 4,21,3 Millichope note). There is no trace of Wenlock's holding here in later times. The manor passed as expected to t
he Mortimers, Hugh }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Mortuo Mari }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holding 5 hides at }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Cheylmerse }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
in 1255 and the advowson of the church being held by Wigmore Abbey; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 81b, 104a; 108a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. no.114; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 232; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 166a; Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 36; and 6,2 Cleobury note.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab In the Alecto facsimile }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 CELMERES}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  resembles }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 CELMBRES}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see 3c,7 Perkley note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,11,7\tab SIDBURY. The Domesday form is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Sudberie}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 This was an Ancient Parish. It 
seems to have been in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086, later in Stottesdon Hundred and in the Liberty of Cleobury Mortimer. In the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 963, 972, Ralph }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
de Arras }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds two fees in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Sodbyr' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 or }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Sutbur' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Nenton' }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Neenton: 4,11,8)}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from the barony of Ralph }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Mortuomari. }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 It appears as 1 \'bd hides in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pulbyr' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 81b; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iv. pp. 232, 246; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 108a; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 60.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab IN LORDSHIP. The Ordnance Survey facsimile does not reproduce the abbreviation line in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 d'nio}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, which is faint in the manuscript. See 3f,7 plough note for examples of other imperfect reproductions in this facsimile. It is visible in the Alecto facsimile.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a third of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,11,8\tab NEENTON. The Domesday form is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Newentone. }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in "Alnodestreu" Hundre
d in 1086, later in Stottesdon Hundred and in the Liberty of Cleobury Mortimer and it had the same descent as Sidbury (4,11,7). Ralph }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Arraz }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Neynton' }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 81b, from Roger }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Mortuo Mari }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and it is coupled with Sidbury in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 963, 972, and in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. no. 235; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 55; and 4,11,7 Sidbury note. For the Shrewsbury Abbey interest in Neenton, see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 166a; and 4,1,5 St Pet
er note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab AZUR. On this name, see 4,1,35 Azur note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \'bd HIDE. [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a space suitable for about four letters after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 dimid' hida.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see 1,5 hide note.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,11,9\tab BURWARTON. This was an Ancient Parish. It probably lay in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086 and was later in Stottesdon Hundred and in the Liberty of Cleobury Mortimer. Helgot's 1086 subtenancy is represented in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 82b, by Thomas }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Costentyn }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 who holds \'bd hide in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Burewarton' }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from Roger }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Mortuo Mari}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 963, 972; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum
}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 108a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 232, 246; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. no. 747, iii. no. 629, iv. nos. 235, 321; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 31.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HELGOT <OF HOLDGATE>. See 4,11,1 Helgot note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab AZUR. On this name, see 4,1,35 Azur note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,11,10\tab COSFORD. This lay in Albrighton Ancient Parish, near Shifnal. A place called }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Costesford }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
is found in charter-grants by Wulhere, King of the Mercians, ostensibly in 664, and by Ethelred, King of the Mercians supposedly in 680, both to Peterborough Abbey: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Early Charters of the West Midlands}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 147 nos. 426-47 (= Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , nos. 68, 72). Although the charters are post-Conquest forgeries, the spellings are often pre-Conque
st. This place could be Cosford, but there is no trace of any Peterborough interest here.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab In 1086 Cosford lay apparently in "Alnodestreu" Hundred, but it did not descend with Ralph of Mortimer's other manors. Instead it went to the Pitchfords of Albright
on (4,25,6) and was given before 1176 to Buildwas Abbey; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 260b; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 359; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 191; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 262; and 4,9,1 Shifnal note.
\par \tab \tab 
It may be relevant in view of its descent that the main scribe of Great Domesday did not describe the holder as 'The same Ralph', but as plain 'Ralph', as if he were unsure of his identity; see SHR 4 Roger note. It is possible that this Ralph was an ances
tor of, or connected to, the Pitchfords.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a third of a line after the lordship, probably for the later insertion of any population or resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,11,11\tab HIGHLEY. This was an Ancient Parish. It was in 'Conditre' Hundred in 1086 and later in Stottesdon Hundred and in the Liberty of Cleobury Mortimer. Robert }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Wodeton' }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and Roger }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Borewardesleg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 held 1 fee in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hugeleg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from the barony of Ralph of Mortimer in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 963, 972, and Robert }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Lacy }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 held 2 hides here in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 81b; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 108a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 232, 246; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. nos. 89-90, Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 260; 
and 6,2 Cleobury note. The church went to Wigmore Abbey (see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 166a), and the White Nuns of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Breowode }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(Brewood) held 1\'bd virgates here later (see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 162a).}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining third of a line after the woodland detail, perhaps for the later insertion of other resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,11,12\tab WALTON. This lay in Stottesdon Ancient Parish. It lay in 'Conditre' Hundred in 1086 and was later in Stottesdon Hundred. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 82b, the Abbot of Wigmore, enfeoffed by Roger }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Mortuo Mari}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds \'bd hide in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Walton' Savage }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in Stottesdon Hundred; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 108ab; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 165a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 203; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 271.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab INGELRANN <OF WALTON>. Descent from Edric (the wild) and Ingelrann was to the Savage family; see Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 280; and 4,11,16 Overton note. While Edric and the Savages may h
ave been connected by blood, it is not clear how Ingelrann fits in. The estates may have reverted to or been claimed by Edric's heirs after Ingelrann's death. It is likely, however, that Ralph of Mortimer's subtenant Ingelrann here and in 4,11,16. 6,7;10;
18;20 is the same man, as also the Ingelrann who held from Ralph of Mortimer in HAM 29,15, a manor which had been held }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  by an Edric.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab EDRIC [* THE WILD *]. The descent of the manor to the Savage family suggests this identification; see 4,1,14 Edric note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,11,13\tab BAVENEY. This lay in Neen Savage Ancient Parish. It lay in 'Conditre' Hundred in 1086 and was later held under the Mortimers by the de Ribbesford family. It is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Balbeneye }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 206, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Babbeneye }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calend
ar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. no. 235; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 258.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The Domesday name is represented by Upper Baveney Farm (SO6979) and Lower Baveney (SO6978).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab "FECH". The Domesday form}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 may represent Old Irish }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Fiacc }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 or Old Norse }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Feigr}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 250; Fellows-Jensen, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Scandinavian Personal Names}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 81. In view of the uncertainty, it has been thought safer for the present edition to keep to the Domesday form. Both th
e Phillimore printed edition and the Alecto edition have Fech. See also 6,3 "Lel" note. Compare WOR 16,3 "Feche" note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \'bd HIDE. 1 VIRGATE OF THESE TWO LAY. The main scribe of Great Domesday had written }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ibi dimidia hida. Vna ex his iacebat \'85}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . Scribe B then interlined }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 uirgata}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , with an insertion mark between }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Vna}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ex}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , and also }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 duab}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ] with a slightly differently shaped insertion mark after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 his}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
. The circuit volume may well have had '2 virgates; 1 of these lay \'85', and in converting the 2 virgates to \'bd
 hide, while leaving the rest of the sentence as it was, the main scribe of Great Domesday failed to see that it did not make sense. Scribe B should really have also interlined }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 uirgatis}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  after }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 duab}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ].}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab CLEOBURY [MORTIMER]. It was held by Ralph of Mortimer directly from the king in 6,2.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 PLOUGH. The Ordnance Survey facsimile does not reproduce the dot after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 car' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 here. See 3f,7 plough note. It is perfectly clear in the Alecto facsimile.}{
\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,11,14\tab WALL TOWN. The Domesday form is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Walle}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 This place lay 
in the Ancient Parish of Neen Savage. It was in 'Conditre' Hundred in 1086. It appears to have lost its separate identity (there being no forms recorded between 1086 and 1526), and been annexed to the demesne of Cleobury Mortimer. Part went to Wigmore Abb
ey; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 274; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 298.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab RICHARD <OF BRAMPTON>. On his being the same man as others of the same name holding under Ralph of Mortimer, see 6,23 Richard note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 HIDE. The }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 i }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is written over an erasure of a single figure, probably }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 v }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 or}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  x }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and is blurred, but the correction by the main scribe of Great Domesday was immediate because there is no sign of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hida }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 corrected from 
}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hid\'ea}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The side ruling falls on the dot after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hida}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 so he must have intended to add }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geld' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 or }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 non geld' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
in the central margin; see 4,3,35 hides note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab PLOUGHMEN. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 bouar'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  over an erasure.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,11,15\tab CATSLEY. This lay in Kinlet Ancient Parish. In 1086 it was in 'Conditre' Hundred and was later in Stottesdon Hundred and in the Liberty of Cleobury Mortimer. In the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 963, 972, William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Forda }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and Thomas }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Bardeleg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hold half a}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 fee in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Cackesleg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from the barony of Ralph }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Mortuomari}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 81b, 108a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 246; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 260.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \'bd HIDE. [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a space suitable for about four letters after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 dimid' hida.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see 1,5 hide note.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,11,16\tab OVERTON. This was a township of Stottesdon Ancient Parish. On the possibility that it lay in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086, see 4,1,30 hundred note. It was later in Stottesdon Hundred and in the Liberty of Cl
eobury Mortimer. Here as elsewhere (see 4,11,5 Eudon note; 4,11,12 Walton note) land held by Edric (the wild) or by Ingelrann (or in this case by both) passed first to the Savage family (Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 269). Subsequently, in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 963, 972, Geoffrey}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Overton }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 1 fee in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Overton'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Eudon' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Eudon: 4,11,5) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Cornleg' }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Coreley: 6,1) of the barony of Ralph }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Mortuo Mari}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}
{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 82b, 108a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 246; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. no. 235; Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 269.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab INGELRANN <OF WALTON>. See 4,11,12 Ingelrann note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab EDRIC [* THE WILD *].}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  The descent of the manor to the Savage family suggests this identification; see 4,1,14 Edric note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 2 HIDES [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a space suitable for about four letters at the beginning of the next line after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ii hid\'ea}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
; see 1,5 hide note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,11,17\tab RALPH. For this entry and the following two (4,11,18-19) the main scribe of Great Domesday did n
ot write 'The same Ralph' as he usually did for entries in a sub-chapter after the first one, but 'Ralph holds from the earl', treatment accorded to the first entry. He also left a very small space before this entry. See SHR 4 Roger note. This suggests th
a
t he was not convinced that Ralph was Ralph of Mortimer (as also in 4,11,10; see 4,11,10 Cosford note); three different people called Ralph could well be implied in these three entries. The fact that none of these entries remained with the Mortimers, but 
descended to the barony of Wigmore, further suggests that another Ralph was Earl Roger's subtenant here. This would also explain why these three entries disrupt the standard hundredal order of this sub-chapter; see 4,11 Ralph note.}{
\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab PRESTON[-UPON-THE-WEALD-
MOORS]. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. It did not continue in the Mortimer fief, but went to the fee of Hodnet, becoming a member of the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 caput }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of the barony; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 257; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, xi p. 177; and 4,1,4 Hodnet note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab BURRER. Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Burrer }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 may be a scribal error for }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Burred }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 which represents Old English }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Burgraed}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 213.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WHICH PAYS TAX. Scribe B added }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 gld'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  in the central margin in a thicker pen and in slightly darker ink to the surrounding text; see 4,1,1 pay note.}{
\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,11,18\tab RALPH. On the suspicion that this is not Ralph of Mortimer, see 4,11,17 Ralph note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ISOMBRIDGE. The Domesday form is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Asnebruge}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
. This lay in Rodington Ancient Parish. It was in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. The Mortimer interest here was lost after 1086, the manor being confirmed on the chief forester of Shropshire. In the }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 6, Robert son of William, the king's forester of Shropshire, holds in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Anebrig}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 160, iii. no. 15, iv. no. 115.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Isombridge gradually declined in importance and became a member of a large scattered manor of which Great Bolas (SJ6421) was }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 caput. }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 The }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 115, gives the members of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bowlas }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Meiston }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Meeson SJ6520), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Esumbrige }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Isombridge),}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Caynton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Caynton SJ6921), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calvynton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Calvington SJ7022), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Ellerton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(Orleton SJ6311, perhaps a part of Wellington (4,1,22) or of Wrockwardine (4,1,1) in 1086) and half of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Sogdon }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Sugdon SJ6014; see 4,3,31 Rodington note). For Bolas, see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 6; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 57b; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 222; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 510, iv. no. 115; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 264. For Calvington, see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 6. On Meeson, see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 160. On Orleton, which included part of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rodingtun }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Rodington: 4,3,31), see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisit
ions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 160, iii. no. 328, iv. no. 279; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 237.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab On the whole manor, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 262.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,11,19\tab [IN HODNET? HUNDRED]. In 1086 Peplow lay close to the border of Hodnet and Wrockwardine Hund
reds, which later merged to form 'Bradford' Hundred. Thus the contents of each hundred have to be reconstructed from Domesday Book itself. In the Phillimore printed edition Peplow was placed in Wrockwardine Hundred, following the hundred head at 4,11,17. 
H
owever, as a member of Hodnet Ancient Parish it could well have been in Hodnet Hundred in 1086. The main scribe of Great Domesday presumably thought it was not in Wrockwardine Hundred as he left a space for a hundred head; see 4,11,19 Earl note. The inser
tion of a Hodnet hundred head would only disrupt the standard hundredal order of 4,11 if Ralph were Ralph of Mortimer; see 4,11,17 Ralph note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab RALPH. On the suspicion that this is not Ralph of Mortimer, see 4,11,17 Ralph note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab PEPLOW. This was formerly a 
township of Hodnet Ancient Parish and is now in Hodnet Civil Parish. It may well have lain in Hodnet Hundred in 1086. It was later in 'Bradford' Hundred. Like Preston-upon-the-Weald-Moors (4,11,17) it passed from Ralph of Mortimer and ultimately (with Lit
tle Bolas, its member) became part of the fee of Hodnet (4,1,4 Hodnet note): Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, viii. p. 254. The tithes were given to Shrewsbury Abbey: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. 7-8, 11, 296, etc.).}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab FROM EARL ROGER [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining half of the line after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 PAPELAV }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
which has no dot after it. He probably intended to add a hundred head here; see 4,1,22 Earl note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a quarter of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of a resource; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,12\tab RICHARD [* OF MONTGAROULT *]. He is apparently Richard of Montgaroult in the French d\'e9partement of Orne (arrondissement Argentan, canton Ecouch\'e9) who was a benefactor of Shrewsbury Abbey and of Saint-Martin de S
\'e9es; see Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 360.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,12,1\tab 
THIS ENTRY was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday, using a paler ink, in the space that he had left at the end of the lands which Ralph of Mortimer held from Earl Roger. It is not rubricated and was added in the same campaign as the other unrubric
a
ted entries in Shropshire and as some in other circuits; see 3c,14 entry note. It is a duplicate of an entry already written (4,27,30); see 4,12,1 Aisil note. The Great Domesday scribe probably forgot that he had already included Richard with other lesser
 
tenants of Earl Roger in 4,27 (see 4,27 tenants note). Compare 4,1,34 which was added at the same time and is also a duplicate of material already entered at 4,27,14. The fact that he wrote smaller and so close to the preceding sub-chapter (almost 4 cms. 
remain after the entry before the bottom marginal ruling) may suggest that he envisaged the discovery of further holdings of Richard and intended to delete the entry at 4,27,30. Lewis ('Introduction', }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Shropshire Domesday}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 8) has suggested that the closen
ess of this entry to Ralph's subtenancy was perhaps to show that Richard held as Ralph's man, but the scribe definitely left a space before Richartd's land. Moreover, he wrote Richard's name (in capitals and with a large initial) as if he were a subtenant
 
of Earl Roger in his own right and this would have been lined through in red if work on Domesday Book had not upruptly terminated. The Great Domesday scribe was also generally quite careful to record that someone was 'the man of' another person. The omiss
ion of the hundred head (see 4,12,1 Wrockwardine note) might suggest that the source of this addition was not the same as for the entry at 4,27,30, though such an omission is common in added entries, especially unrubricated ones.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [IN WROCKWARDINE HUNDRED]. The Wrockwardine hundred head can be supplied from the duplicate of this entry at 4,27,30 (4,12,1 entry note).}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \'bd HIDE. It pays tax according to 4,27,30.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab BROCKTON. This is probably the Brockton that lay in Longford Ancient Parish. It lay in Wrockwardine 
Hundred in 1086 and later presumably in 'Bradford' Hundred. There seems to be no other 'Brockton' lying in the area of Wrockwardine Hundred, but the descent is far from clear. It is possible that it was annexed to Longford manor (4,19,1) for a Brockton is
 mentioned among its members in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 114. See Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 125.}{
\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab AISIL. The Domesday form }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Aisil }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 here and in 4,27,30 may represent Old English }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \'c6thelsige}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 the Domesday form of which is regularly }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ailsi}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 142 and \'a7 66 on the final }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 l}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
. This name, which appears nowhere else in Domesday Book, adds to the proof that 4,12,1 and 4,27,30 are duplicate entries.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 FREE MAN; HE PAYS 12d. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Redd' xvi denar' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 m
ust be the payment of the free man, rather than of the manor (i.e. he 'farms' the holding; see 3d,5 revenue note), because the duplicate of this entry in 4,27,30 states that the free man }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
reddit xvi denar' de firma. VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 331, however, translates 'It pays 16 pence', referring to the holding. See DEV 52,48 villager note for discussion of a similar statement and compare 3g,9 paid note.}{
\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,13\tab WILLIAM OF WARENNE. He probably came from La Varenne in the French d\'e9partement of Seine-Maritime (arrondissement, }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
canton and commune Bellencombre). He was the son of Ralph II of Warenne and Emma. William was a major force in William I\rquote s England, especially important as holder of the Rape of Lewes, Sussex. At Lewes, he founded a Cluniac Priory 1078 x 1082. He 
sided with William II against Odo, Bishop of Bayeux, and Robert Count of Mortain early in 1088 and was appointed Earl of Surrey in mid to late April of that same year. However, he was wounded at the siege of Pevensey, and died in June 1088. He was first m
arried to Gundreda, sister of Gerbod the Fleming, Earl of Chester (left his earldom }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 c}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
. 1071, died 1085) and then to the sister of Richard Guet. His successor in England was his son William (II), also Earl of Surrey, who forfeited in 1101.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,13,1\tab WHITCHURCH. Whitchurch was an Ancient Parish and lay in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. The Domesday form is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Westune}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
. It was also known in the Middle Ages as }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Album Monasterium}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of which the Norman-French }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Blaminister }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and English Whitchurch are equivalents: Ekwall, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Dictionary of English Placenames}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 310. It is thus easily confused with Oswestry (4,1,11 Oswestry note). Before 1066 it had a number of Cheshire dependencies (at Marbury, Norbury, Wirswall and Stoneley: CHS
 8,21;41) but these are not afterwards counted as members. It continued to be held by the Counts of Warenne (the Earls Warren), 7 \'bd hides still being recorded as the size of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Albimonast' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 58a. The Lestrange family also had an interest here in the late thirteenth century. See }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iv. pp. 222, 226; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 387, vi. no. 516, ix. no. 223.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , gives the members as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hilton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Hinton? SJ5343), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Burthall' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(Broughall SJ5641), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wodhows }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Old and New Woodhouse, SJ5842, SJ5941), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Magna Asche }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Parva Asche }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(Ash Magna, Ash Parva, SJ5739), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Tildstoke }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Tilstock SJ5437), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hethley }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(unidentified, but there are a Heath Road and Heath Paddocks south of Whitchurch, SJ5539, SJ5538) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Kempley }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (The Kempley SJ5936).
\par \tab \tab On the whole manor, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 14.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining half a line after the hedged enclosures, perhaps for the later insertion of other resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,14\tab WILLIAM PANDOLF. William was lord of Noron in the Hi\'e9mois in Earl Roger's vicomt\'e9 of the Oximin. Noron is now Noron-L'Abbaye, in the French d\'e9partement of Calvados (arrondissement Caen, canton Falaise-Nord).
 He was a great benefactor of the Abbey of Saint-Evroult, to which in 1073 he gave, among other things, St Peter's Church and Priory at Noron which he had founded; see Orderic Vitalis, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ecclesiastical History}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  (Chibnall, iii. pp. 154-59). Saint-Evroult is where he sought refuge after he was accused by Earl Roger's son, Robert of Bell\'eame, of the murder of Earl Roger's first wife, Mabel; see Orderic Vitalis, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ecclesiastical History}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  (Chibnall, iii. pp. 160-63). He was reinstated by King Henry I. His English lands formed the barony of Wem}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
and passed to his second son Robert in 1112, then continued in the family to William Pandolf (died 1233) whose heirs were Maud and Elizabeth. Elizabeth's share went on her death to Maud who married Ralph Butler, then Walter de Hop
ton. After her death the barony descended in the Butler family. See Sanders,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  English Baronies}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 94-95; Loyd, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Some Anglo-Norman Families}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 76; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 494.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab }{\insrsid4139880 William's byname, probably a patronymic - }{\i\insrsid4139880 Pantul}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 Pantulf}{\insrsid4139880  - represents Old German }{\i\insrsid4139880 Pandulf}{\insrsid4139880 , 
}{\i\insrsid4139880 Pandolfus}{\insrsid4139880 : Tengvik, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Old English Bynames}{\insrsid4139880 , p. 223; Forssner, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Continental-Germanic Personal Names in England}{\insrsid4139880 , p. 203.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab The hundredal order of this sub-chapter is as follows (the bracketed numbers are explained in SHR 4 arrangement note):
\par \tab \tab 4,14,1-11 Hodnet Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,14,12-13 Condover Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,14,14-21 Wrockwardine Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,14,22-25 "Culvestan" Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,14,26 [Baschurch] Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,14,27 (uncertain)
\par \tab \tab 4,14,28 'Conditre' Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,14,29 Patton Hundred.
\par \tab Entries 4,14,28-29 are later additions to the text, but only the last is out of sequence.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,14,1\tab WOLVERLEY. This formerly lay in Wem Ancient Parish. It is now in the Civil Parish of Wem Rural. It was in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. It went to the barony o
f Wem and was later counted as a part of the manor of Wem; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 182; and 4,14,4 Wem note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WHICH PAY TAX. Scribe B inserted }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 gld'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  in a space left by the main scribe of Great Domesday after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hid\'ea.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  On the spaces left for the taxability to be entered, see 1,5 hide note. On scribe B's other additions on this subject, see 4,1,1 pay note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,14,2\tab [GREAT] WYTHEFORD. This lay in Shawbury Ancient Parish. It was in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. Another part 
of the vill was held by Reginald the sheriff (4,3,4-5) and in the thirteenth century both parts were held by the Fitz Ayer family under Fitz Alan and the barony of Wem respectively: in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 57a, 1\'bd virgates in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wythyford }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 are held by John Fitz Ayer from the barony of Wem. It is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Withefeld Magna }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 237. On the manor as a whole, see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iii. no. 115, v. no. 470; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 184.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a quarter of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,14,3\tab HORTON. This place was in Wem Ancient Parish. It lay in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. Horton is later counted as a member of the manor of Wem; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 178; and 4,14,4 Wem note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab AELFEVA. }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The Domesday forms of this name - }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Alueua}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Aelueua}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Alueue}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Elueua}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Elfgiuae}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Aluiua}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Aueue}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  - represent the feminine Old English }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \'c6lfgifu}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, pp. 173-74. JRM preferred Aelfeva as it reflected more closely the Domesday forms. The Alecto edition has \'c6lfgifu.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,14,4\tab WEM. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred and became the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 caput }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of the Pandolf barony of Wem. In }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 58a, Ralph }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Le Butiler }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 14 hides in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wem'e}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 while William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 le Butiller }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wemme }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Hynstoke }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Hinstock: 4,14,14) of the barony of Wem in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 237; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iv. pp. 222, 226; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. nos. 390, 773, 774.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The manor was only 4 hides in 1086; the difference between this and the 14 hides of the}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, is accounted for by Wem's having absorbed later a number of vills that were separately assessed in 1086; thus the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 114-15, gives the members as: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Aston }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Aston: 4,14,11); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stiell' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Steel: 4,7,5); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Tilley }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Tilley SJ5027); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Dichelowe }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(?The Ditches SJ4929 and Lowe SJ5030; see 4,8,2 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 629); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Horton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Horton: 4,14,3); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Wolverley }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Wolverley: 4,14,1); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Edisstoston }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Edstaston: 4,14,6); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Coton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Coton: 4,14,7); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Harpecote }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Harcourt: 4,14,10); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Beslow }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Bestow: 4,14,16); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Dodyngton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Dodington: 4,7,4); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Alkynton}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 (Alkington: 4,14,8); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Edisley }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Edgeley: 4,7,3). The }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  also includes under Wem the manors of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hynstocke }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Hinstock: 4,4,14), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Upton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Waters Upton: 4,8,9), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Tibrighton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Tibberton: 4,7,2), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Dawley }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(Dawley: 4,1,22), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Eton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Eyton-upon-the-Weald-Moors: 4,14,18), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Brocketon }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Bratton: 4,14,19), half of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Dawley }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(Lawley: 4,14,21) and half of}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Parva Drayton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Drayton; see 4,14,9 Drayton note). Newtown (SJ4831) was a chapelry of Wem in later times; its name may suggest that it dated from after 1086.
\par \tab \tab On the whole manor, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 157.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,14,5\tab TYR
LEY. This was a township of the Ancient Parish of Drayton-in-Hales (also known as Market Drayton). It is now a Civil Parish in Staffordshire, the estate having been transferred there, probably under Henry I, to join William (Pandolf)'s Staffordshire manor
 of Almington (STS 8,22); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 5, 11; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 390 (where it is }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Tirley alias Tyrleye }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 held by Ralph}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 le Botiller}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ); see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 192; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Staffordshire Survey}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 p. 7; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
VCH Staffordshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 2, 59.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The exact lie of the 1086 boundary between Almington (the nearest Domesday place in Staffordshire) and Tyrley cannot now be certainly determined as the modern civil parish of Tyrley incorporates both Tyrley and Almington. 
It seems likely, however, that the Coal Brook marked the 1086 boundary between them.}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab The Grid Reference (SJ6733) is to Tyrley Castle Farm.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,14,6\tab EDSTASTON. This was a township and chapelry of Wem Ancient Parish. It is now in the Civil Parish of Wem Rural and a separate Ecclesiastical Parish.
\par \tab \tab The Domesday form is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Stanestune }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 but standing for}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Eadstan's tun}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see Ekwall, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Dictionary of English Placenames}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , under Edstaston; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 121. It seems probable that the main scribe of Great Dom
esday had in front of him a form such as }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Edstanestune}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  or }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Estanestune }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and assumed that the prosthetic }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 E}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 - had been prefixed to the group -}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 st}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 -, so simplified to }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Stanestune}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
. This wrongful simplification occurred several times when the scribe was handling place-names in Exon.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Edstaston lay in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred and was counted as a member of the great manor of Wem; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, ix. p. 179; and 4,14,4 Wem note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining half a line after the woodland detail, perhaps for the later insertion of other resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,14,7\tab COTON. The Domesday form is}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Cote}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . Coton was a townsh
ip of Wem Ancient Parish and now lies in the Ecclesiastical Parish of Edstaston and the Civil Parish of Wem Rural. It was in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred and became a member of Wem manor; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 180; and 4,14,4 Wem note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 2 HIDES AS TWO MANORS. See 4,7,5 hide note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,14,8\tab ALKINGTON. This was a township of Whitchurch Ancient Parish. It lay in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. Although remote from Wem, it later counted as a member of that manor; see Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 183; and 4,14,4 Wem note.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The Grid Reference (SJ5339) is to Alkington Hall (SJ530392). Alkington House is at SJ523390.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,14,9\tab [MARKET] DRAYTON. Market Drayton is also known as Great Drayton. It
 named the Ancient Parish of Market Drayton also known as Drayton-in-Hales. This holding lay in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. The land was bestowed by William Pandolf on the monks of Noron (near Falaise, in the French d\'e9
partement of Calvados, a dependency of Saint-Evroult), whose English estates were managed by the prior of Ware (in Hertfordshire). The estate was leased from that prior by the Abbot of Combermere. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 56a, the Abbot of Combermere holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Draiton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from the prior of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 War'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  
}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 a fee of Hugh }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pounton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Pandolf). }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Drayton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is held by the Abbot of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Cumburmayre }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in alms from the barony of Wem in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 115, and is called }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Drayton in Le Hales }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 227; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 324 no. iii; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 261a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 216; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ix. p. 185; and 4,14,15 Colehurst note. A small part of this holding may have been at Little Drayton, held as }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Parva Drayton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 under the barons of Wem in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 115; see 4,14,4 Wem note and 4,19,8 Drayton note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a quarter of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of a resource; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,14,10\tab HARCOURT. This lay in the Ancient Parish of Stanton-upon-Hine-Heath. It lay in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred, and was counted as a member of Wem manor; see Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 181; and 4,14,4 Wem note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THORSTEN <OF HARCOURT>. }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The Domesday forms of this name - }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Turstan}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Turstan}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{
\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ], }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Turstin}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ), }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Tursten}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{
\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Turstane}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Turtin}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  - represent Old Danish }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Thorsten}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , Old Norse }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Thorsteinn}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 396. In the printed Phillimore edition this }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 holder appears as Thurstan and (for YKS) as Thorsteinn; these have now been standardized as Thorsten. The Alecto edition has Thorsten. The only other Thorsten in Domesday Shropshire was Earl Roger's predecessor in Broome (4,28,1).
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Although the name-form }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Turstinus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 is common, it is uncommon among pre-Conquest landowners. As these are the only two occurrences in Shropshire, it is possible they represent one individual despite the distance between the properties (JP).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,14,11\tab ASTON. This was in Wem Ancient Parish. It lay in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred and became a member of Wem manor; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 180; and 4,14,4 Wem note.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The Grid Reference is to Aston Hall (SJ531286).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,14,12\tab IN THE OUTER MARGIN of the manuscript, level with the first line of this entry, is written a }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 k }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in darker ink; it stands for }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 kalumnia/kalumpnia }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 or }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 klamor }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ('claim'). It means that a c
laim had been made for this land (the Bishop of Hereford was contesting the alienation of Bayston; see 4,14,12 Bayston note). It is impossible to tell exactly when the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 k }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
was written, but the ones in Domesday Lincolnshire, for example, are definitely contemporary. On these and other marginal letters indicating disputes, see Thorn, 'Marginal Notes and Signs', p. 124 (= Erskine and Williams, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
The Story of Domesday Book}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 188-90). See also Fleming, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday Book and the Law}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 226 no. 1329.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab BAYSTON. This wa
s formerly in Condover Ancient Parish and is now in the Ecclesiastical Parish and Civil Parish of Bayston Hill. It was in Condover Hundred in 1086 and later. It was restored to the Bishop of Hereford and was held under him as }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Beyston }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 63a, by Richard }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Sprenthose}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 215, 230; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 298; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 40.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The original settlement was probably at Lower Bayston (SJ4908): }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 34; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 35.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab EDRIC [* OF BAYSTON *]. Edric was probably Edric of Bayston, the Bishop of Hereford's steward, not Edric the wild (as Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, vi. pp. 298-99). William Pandolf probably acquired Bayston on the death of Edric (some time between 1085 and the date of Domesday) because it was only about a mile from his manor of Norton (4,14,13). See Mason, 'Edric of Bayston'; Williams, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The English and the Norman Conquest}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 94.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [PART] OF HIS SUPPLIES. That is, either the revenue
 from Bayston was devoted to supplying the Bishop of Hereford or the manor provided produce directly for the bishop's table; compare the fishery in Eyton-on-Severn, 3b,2, which was for the monks' supplies.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab FOR HIS LIFE ONLY. Latin }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in uita sua}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 sua }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ('his') refers to the bishop as subject of the two main verbs }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 poterat }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 prestiterat }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (compare }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de uictu suo }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in the line above). In fact, however, the lease must have been intended to last only for Edric's life
, a common term; see Galbraith, 'An Episcopal Land-Grant of 1085', p. 364. Strictly the Latin should read }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in uita eius }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 referring to }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 eo }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ei }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 above.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,14,13\tab NORTON. This was in Condover Ancient Parish. It lay in Condover Hundred in 1086 and later. It descended to the barony of Wem, being still assessed as 1 hide in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Norton }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 62b; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 587; Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 300; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 41. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisi
tions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v. no. 611, it is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Norton by Conedovere}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining quarter of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,14,14\tab HINSTOCK. This was an Ancient Parish. The vill was in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. That Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Stoche }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
is later represented by Hinstock is proved by the descent: in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 58a, Ralph }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 le Butiler }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hinestoke }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in 'Bradford' Hundred from the barony of Wem; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 390; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 114; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 222, 227. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hinestok }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wemme }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (4,14,4) are coupled in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 964, 972, and in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 237. On this manor, see 4,14,4 Wem note; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 20.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab SAXFRITH <OF HINSTOCK>. }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The Domesday forms of this name - }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Sasford}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Saxford}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{
\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Saxford}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ] - represent Old English }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Seaxfrith}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conque
st Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 357. JRM preferred the first element Sax- for the Old English }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Seax-}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
. The printed Phillimore edition has the forms Saxfrid, Sasfrid and, in Yorkshire in error, Saexfrith; these have now been standardized as Saxfrith. The Alecto edition has Seaxfrith for the }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 holders, but Sasfrid for the 1086 ones.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 The name Saxfrith occurs 19 times in Domesday Book, probably representing four individuals. The two holdings in Shropshire, in adjacent vills and held from the same te
nant-in-chief, probably belonged to one individual (JP).}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WHICH PAY TAX. Scribe B inserted }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geld'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  into a space left by the main scribe of Great Domesday after}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  ii hide 7 dimid'}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . On the spaces left for the taxability to be entered, see 1,5 hide note. On scribe B's other additions on this subject, see 4,1,1 pay note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,14,15\tab COLEHURST. }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The Domesday form is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Corselle}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
This estate was identified by Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v
iii. p. 24, as Cross Hills (SJ7025) which lay in Hinstock Ancient Parish (see 4,14,14) and shared the same 1086 holder. It thus lay in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. The identification was adopted tentatively by }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 332, and firmly by the Phillimore printed edition and by the Alecto edition. It had already been suggested by Purton, 'Corselle and Siwaldston', that }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Corselle}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  was Colehurst in Sutton-upon-Tern, in the same hundred (Wrockwardine) and held under the ba
rony of Wem in 1346. The increasing number of forms of the place-name that have now been accumulated and the acceptance of the assimilation of the termination to }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \endash hurst}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 make this identification more likely. It was adopted by}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p
. 95, and has been substituted for Cross Hills in this edition. Sutton-upon-Tern was formerly the Ancient Parish of Drayton-in-Hales (also known as Market Drayton). It is now in the Ecclesiastical Parish of Little Drayton.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 964, Ralph }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 le Gras }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds \'bd fee in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Colsisel }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
from the barony of Wem. It is }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Colshesel }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 237, and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Culsis' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 coupled with }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Bunstansdale }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Buntingsdale SJ6532, possibly part of Drayton: 4,14,9) in the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 115.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab SAXFRITH <OF HINSTOCK>. See 4,14,14 Saxfrith note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WHICH PAY TAX. Scribe B added }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geld'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . The main scribe of Great Domesday had written }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hid\'ea}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 up to the side ruling, apparently intending the word }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geld'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , if found, to be added in the margin, which is what happened; see 1,5 hide note.
 On scribe B's other additions of this word, see 4,1,1 pay note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 SMALLHOLDER WHO HAS NOTHING. This may mean that he has no land (so Lennard, 'Bordars and Cottars', p. 356), but it is possible that, as Shropshire (in common with almost all Great Domesday
 counties) never records the smallholders' land holding, but regularly lists their ploughs (or their share in them), ploughs are what the smallholder here lacks. Compare 4,14,19 where 5 smallholders have nothing and WOR 26,9;14 for similar phrases; see al
so 4,9,4 nothing note and LEC 15,15. On smallholders generally, see 1,8 smallholders note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a third of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 
VALUE ... NOW 12d. There seems no obvious reason why the value of Colehurst should have declined so dramatically since the date of its acquisition: it is not near the Welsh border and so subject to raids. It is possible, therefore, that }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 xii denar' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is a scribal error for }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 xii solid' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(there are several suggestions in Great Domesday of similar scribal errors in value). However, Bratton (4,14,19) where smallholders with nothing are also recorded (see 4,14,15 smallholder note) was 'almost waste
' in 1086, so perhaps much of Colehurst was similarly waste, though the scribe for some reason failed to note this. Alkington (4,14,8) also declined in value in 1086, but no scribal error is suggested there because of the use of }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 tantum }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 'only' with the value.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,14,16\tab BESLOW. This was in Wroxeter Ancient Parish. It lay in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086, later}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
in 'Bradford' Hundred. It was later counted as a member of Wem manor; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 40; and 4,14,4 Wem note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WHICH PAYS TAX. Scribe B added }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geld'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 over an erasure. On his other contributions of the same nature, see 4,1,1 pay note. On what might have been erased here, see 1,5 hide note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a third of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,14,17\tab BUTTERY. This was in Edgmond Ancient parish. It lay in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. It had the same early descent as Eyton-upon-the-Weald-Moors (4,14,18) before being given by Robert }
{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Eitona }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 to Shrewsbury Abbey with the consent of Ivo Pantulf: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, no. 33 p. 29,
 no. 280 p. 267; see pp. xx, 249). Thereafter it became a member of Sleap manor (4,6,5 Crudgington note). See Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 36.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WHICH PAYS TAX. Scribe B was forced to interline }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geld'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  as the main scribe of Great Domesday had fa
iled to leave a space after the hidage (see 1,5 hide note on these spaces). On other insertions on taxability by scribe B, see 4,1,1 pay note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a quarter of a line after the oxen, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,14,18\tab EYTON[-UPON-THE-WEALD-MOORS]. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 58a, Peter }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Eiton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds from Ralph }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 le Butiler }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 with service at Wem, while John }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Eyton }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Eyton super Wildemore }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 237; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 964, 972; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 26; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, xi. p. 139; and 4,7,1 Sutton note and 4,14,4 Wem note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WARIN <OF EYTON>. This Warin, distinct from Warin the sheriff (4,3,8;71), was succeeded by the de Eyton family, named from this holding. He may have been their ancestor: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 139; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 461.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WHICH PAY TAX. Scribe B inserted }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geld'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 here, perhaps over an erasure (or possibly a rough patch of parchment) or in a space left by the main scribe of Great Domesday after the hidage; see 1,5 hide note. On scribe B's other additions on the taxability of a holding, see 4,1,1, pay note.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a third of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,14,19\tab BRATTON. The Domesday form is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Brochetone}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
. This was in the Ancient Parish of Wrockwardine. It lay in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. It descended with Eyton (4,14,18) in the de Eyton family; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 115; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 36; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, xi. p. 313; and 4,7,1 Sutton note; 4,14,4 Wem note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WARIN <OF EYTON>. See 4,14,18 Warin note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab SMALLHOLDERS ... HAVE NOTHING. See 4,14,15 smallholder note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,14,20\tab HORTON. This was formerly in Wellington Ancien
t Parish, now in the Civil Parish of Hadley. It lay in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. Part continued to be held of the barony of Wem, but much was claimed and held for a period by the de Hodnets: in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 59a, Odo }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Hodnet }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 receives rents from John }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Horton}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 See Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 38; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 257; and 4,1,4 Hodnet note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WARIN <OF EYTON>. See 4,14,18 Warin note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,14,21\tab LAWLEY. This was formerly a township of Wellington
 Ancient Parish and remains for civil purposes in its successor, Wellington Civil Parish. It is now a separate Ecclesiastical Parish. It lay in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred, and was divided in 1086 between William Pandolf and 
Turold (4,19,6). William's portion is the 2 virgates in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Laneleg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 held in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 56a, in 'Bradford' Hundred, by Ralph }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Stanto' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of the fee of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wemme}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and the half of the vill held by Ralph }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Staunton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from Peter }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Eton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 who holds from the lord of Wem in the }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 112; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 219; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 115; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 37; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, xi. p. 277; and 4,7,1 Sutton note and 4,14,4 Wem note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,14,22\tab [
UPPER] LEDWYCHE. This was once a separate Ancient Parish, but was in Bitterley Ancient Parish by 1535. It lay in "Culvestan" Hundred in 1086, later in Munslow Hundred. It did not continue with the barony of Wem, but the mesne tenancy passed from Berner to
 de Higford and the overlordship to de Lacy and then Fitz Alan, as at Middleton (4,14,23). In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 70a, Geoffrey }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Ledewich }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 2 hides in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ledewich }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from Walter }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Hugeford}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 223; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 87. Lower Ledwyche lay in Ludford Ancient Parish and belonged to the Church of Bromfield: 3d,4 hide note.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 74b, in 'Overs' Hundred, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Cletone }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Cleeton St Mary SO6178), 1 hide, is held by William }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Cletone }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from Geoffrey }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Ledewich}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 372, was unable to assign this to any Domesday manor, but the mention of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Ledewich }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and the fact that }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Cleoton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
is held from the Fitz Alans (by the Abbot of Wigmore) in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Miscellaneous}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. no. 234 (see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, (old series) iii. p. 222) points to it as a member of Upper Ledwyche.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab BERNER <OF HIGFORD>. See 4,8,12 Berner note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a third of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HE FOUND IT WASTE. This was written over an erasure by the main scribe of Great Domesday.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,14,23\tab MIDDLETON. This was in Bitterley Ancient Parish, 
and remains in the Civil Parish of that name. It lay in "Culvestan" Hundred in 1086 and was later in Munslow Hundred. The descent was the same as for Upper Ledwyche, the de Higfords holding under Lacy then under Fitz Alan when Walter of Lacy's sister marr
ied William Fitz Alan. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 70a, Walter }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Hugeford }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 3 hides in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Midelton' 
}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from John Fitz Alan; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 223, 229, 244; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, v. p. 84. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 80b, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Midelton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is regarded as a member of Stanton Lacy manor (7,4).}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab BERNER <OF HIGFORD>. See 4,8,12 Berner note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WULFRIC HELD IT, AND EDWIN. An unusual word order: the main scribe of Great Domesday presumably only saw that there were two }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  tenants after he had written 
}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Vluric tenuit}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . There is no sign of the later addition of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 7 Eduin' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 or of a correction of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 tenuit }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 to the plural }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 tenuerunt}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; the entry is neat and clear.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab PLOUGHMEN. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 bouarii}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; Farley printed }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 bouarij}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 as also for the manuscript's }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 bouarii }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in 4,18,3. 4,19,2;5.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,14,24\tab [LITTLE] SUTTON. Little Sutton, \'bd
 hide, was in Diddlebury Ancient Parish and lay in "Culvestan" Hundred in 1086, later in Munslow Hundred. Great Sutton, 2 hides, was also in the parish and a Domesday place (4,21,15). This vill did not descend to the barony of Wem,}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 but became a serjeanty, that of conveying the royal revenue of Shropshire to London. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 70b, Robert }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Sutton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds \'bd hide in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Sutton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 by serjeanty. It is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Parva Sutton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 71b, 100b. See }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 72a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 384, 1184, 1242; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 246; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, i. no. 346, iii. no. 155, iv. no. 396, v. no. 574, vi. nos. 372, 531, vii. nos. 64, 333, viii. no. 451, ix. nos. 10, 505, 519, x. no. 11; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 90.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,14,25\tab 'MARSTON'. Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Merstun }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is probably from Old English }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 mersc }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 tun }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ('}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 tun }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 by the marsh'). It lay in Diddlebury Ancient Parish and in "Culvestan" Hundred in 1086, later in
 Munslow Hundred. The place is now lost but survived to be recorded on the 1841 Tithe Apportionment for the townships of Broncroft and Lower Parks (in Diddlebury parish) as 'Marstons Meadow'(}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
fields 13-14) at SO528857, south-west of Broncroft Lodge; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 199 (where the grid reference is given as SO532862). Ralph }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
le Botiler }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (barony of Wem) held land in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Meryston }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 7la; see Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 110; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lay Subsidy Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  (1327)}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Munslow Hundred}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 323.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab GAMAL AND WULFRIC HELD IT. [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a space suitable for about six letters after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 tenuer'.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, possibly for the later insertion, if necessary, of a phrase such as }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 p}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ro}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  ii M}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 aneriis}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
] ('as two manors'); such a phrase was added in 4,3,70 and probably also in 4,3,1, but not in a space. It is unlikely to have been left for a hundred head (as elsewhere at the end of the first line of an entry: 4,1,22 Earl note) as there is no need for on
e. On the name Gamal, see 4,8,9 Gamal note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a quarter of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,14,26\tab [IN BASCHURCH HUNDRED]. In view of the later history of this manor, it appears that a hundred head has been omitted.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab SLEAP. This is the estate of Sleap 'Magna', which was in Wem Ancient Parish. It seems to have lain in Baschurch Hundred in 1086 and was later in Pimhill Hundred. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 75a, Robert }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Besselauwe }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (from Beslow: 4,14,16) holds 2 virgates in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Sclepe }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 as a fee of }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wemme}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . In the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pimhill Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 121, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Slepe Magna }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is held by Ralph }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Butler }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 by service at the castle of Wem; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, v. p. 1, x. pp. 42, 205. Sleap 'Magna' and Sleap 'Parva' (see 4,3,53 Myddle note) lay either side of the brook that divides the Ancient Parishes of Wem and Myddle. They are represented by Sleap and Sleap Hall respectively on the first edi
tion Ordnance Survey one-inch map (sheet 73 of 1833, reprint sheet 33 of 1970).}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 FREE MAN. Possibly the 1066 holder Wulfric had been demoted to tenant status; compare 4,8,2 man note and 4,16,1 men note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,14,27\tab "SUDTELCH".}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 This manor, which may be govern
ed by the Baschurch Hundred head supplied in 4,14,26 or may be in some other hundred, has not been identified; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v. p. l, x. p. 206.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ASKI <OF "SUDTELCH">. }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The name Aski occurs four times in Domesday Book, on widely separated and modestly or poorly endowed holdings. Each is likely to have belonged to a different individual (JP).
}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,14,28\tab THIS ENTRY and the next (4,14,29) were added together by the main scribe of Great Domesday below the bottom marginal ruling, some nine le
tters into the outer margin, immediately below the second line of 4,16,2. They are directed to their proper position in the text at the end of William Pandolf's subtenancy by transposition signs; Farley printed them as daggers on their sides, not how they
 appear in the manuscript. The 'Conditre' hundred head was written in the outer margin at the same time and has a dark brown line encasing the bottom of it and the large }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 I }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Isd' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in 4,14,28 encases its right-hand side. 4,14,29 was written on one line extending across the central margin and under folio 257d.
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab In the Alecto Penguin edition these two entries appear confusingly to be part of Walkelin's subtenancy (4,16) and the second half of Walkelin's holding in Faintree (4,16,2) carries straight on from the
 end of 4,14,29. This edition also omitted the 'Conditre' hundred head because of its policy not to include anything written in the margin, whether written by the }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
main scribe of Great Domesday or not; compare 7,2 entry note. The Alecto county edition for Shropshire prints these two added entries exdented and with the hundred head and uses \'a7
 signs for the transposition signs; there is no confusion as to what 4,16,2 contains.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab INGARDINE. This formerly lay in Stottesdon Ancient Parish but is now in Farlow Civi
l Parish. It lay in 'Conditre' Hundred in 1086, later in Stottesdon Hundred. The mesne tenure passed to de Higford (see 4,14,22 Ledwyche note) and the overlordship to Fitz Alan. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 82a, Walter }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Pedeivrthin }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 1 virgate in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ingwrthin}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 while in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 217, the same Walter holds from William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Hugeford }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
who holds from Richard Fitz Alan of the honour of Oswestry; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 188; and 4,1,25 Donington note. On Farlow, see 4,28,5 Farlow note.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,14,29\tab THIS ENTRY and the previous one (4,14,28) were later additions by the main scribe of Great Domesday; see 4,14,28 entry note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab "BUCHEHALE".}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday clearly places this in Patton Hundred, but it has not been identified. Eyton at first identifi
ed it as Monk Hall (3c,2 Wenlock note), then as Bucknell (4,20,26 Adley note). The first assumes that the Domesday form is mistaken, the second that the hundred head is an error; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 26, xi. p. 316. More recently }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 358, has suggested a connection with the names }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bacundale}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  (1380), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Baknall }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (1540) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bakenell }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(1910) which appear on the boundary between Monkhopton and Acton Round, near Monk Hall. However, the evolution of these from }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Buchehale}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  is problematic: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 171, iii. p. 170. It was left unidentified in the Alecto edition.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 
The fact that the main scribe of Great Domesday did not put 'The same William' (i.e. William Pandolf) here, his normal practice for entries after the first in a sub-chapter, may suggest that he was unsure of William's identity. The }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 W}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Will's}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  is also larger than usual; see SHR 4 Roger note. This adds to the problems of identifying this holding.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,15\tab WILLIAM MALBANK. }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 William Malbank was a tenant of Earl Hugh of Chester in Cheshire (CHS 8), and probably also in Dorset (DOR 27,2-11) as well as of Earl Roger h
ere. His heir was his son Hugh who founded the Cistercian Abbey of Combermere in Cheshire in 1133 (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 321}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
) as a dependency of the Abbey of Savigny; see }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Knowles and Hadcock, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Medieval Religious Houses}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 112, 117}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . William's lands 
formed the barony of Wick Malbank, later Nantwich. }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 On the byname \lquote Malbank\rquote  (Great Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Malbedeng }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from Old French }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
mal banc }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \lquote bad bench\rquote ) see Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 349-50. See Farrer, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Honors and Knight's Fees}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 261-68; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 492.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab William held much land over the border from these four manors, in Cheshire (CHS 8) where he was lord of Nantwich (CHS 1,7). Three of his holdings in Shropshire went to the 'barony' of Malbank: Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 373.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,15,1\tab 
GRAVENHUNGER. This formerly lay in Mucklestone Ancient Parish, the southern part of which was and is in Staffordshire. Gravenhunger is now in Woore Civil Parish which was itself formerly a chapelry of Mucklestone Ancient Parish. Gravenhunger w
as in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. It remained in the Malbank barony, and was held in the thirteenth century by the Audleys. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 55a, the 1 hide of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Gravinh'ker }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is held by Roger }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Loskesford }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of the barony of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Mauban' }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in socage with an annual payment to James }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Audith'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 118; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 476, iii. no. 536, v. no. 62; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 373.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The place-name Gravenhunger is represented on Ordnance Survey smaller-scale maps by Gravenhunger Moss (SJ7342), but Gravenhunger Hall lay at SJ7341.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,15,2\tab WOORE. Like Gravenhunger, this formerly lay in Mucklestone Ancient Parish, the southern part of which was and is in Staffordshire: 4,
15,1 Gravenhunger note. It was similarly in Hodnet Hundred, then 'Bradford' Hundred, and followed the same descent to the Audleys. In 1255 (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 55a) }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wavre }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is held as 1 hide of the fee of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Mauban }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Malbank) by Richard }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de War' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
and others; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 220, 227; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 377.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,15,3\tab DORRINGTON. This was once in Mucklestone Ancient Parish, the southern part of which was and is in Staffordshire. It is now in the Civil Parish of Woore which was itse
lf formerly a chapelry of Mucklestone Ancient Parish. Dorrington was formerly in Hodnet Hundred, then 'Bradford' Hundred: 4,15,1 Gravenhunger note. It was given to Wenlock Priory and its thirteenth-century tenants are the lords of Willey (4,19,11). In }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 55a, the 1 hide at }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Derinton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is held by William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Derinton' }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of the fee of Nicholas }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Wilileg'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . The }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 118, and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 220, make it clear that the tenure is under the prior of Wenlock. See }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 227; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 379.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,15,4\tab ONNELEY. This was a township of Madeley Ancient Parish, the bulk of which lay and lies in Staffordshire. The Shropshire portion was in Hodnet Hundred in 1086 and seems early to h
ave been combined with Gravenhunger (4,15,1) with which it no doubt descended: Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 377.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The Grid Reference (SJ7543) is for Onneley Hall. Onneley Hall Farm is at SJ7542.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,16\tab WALKELIN. Nothing is known about this individual. He has not been identified with any other people called plain Walkelin in Domesday Book (LEC 2,1-3. NTH 4,5-11. 26,10. NTT 11,22;24); see Keats-Rohan, }{
\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 445}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab T}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 he hundredal order of this sub-chapter is as follows (the bracketed numbers are explained in SHR 4 arrangement note):
\par \tab \tab 4,16,1 Baschurch Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,16,2 "Alnodestreu" Hundred.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,16,1\tab GRINSHILL. This was an Ancient Parish. It was in Baschurch Hundred in 1086, then in Pimhill Hundred. The Domesday form }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Grivelesul }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 suggests Old English }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 grin }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ('snare', 'trap') and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hyll }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ('hill'), rather than }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 gren }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
('green'); see Ekwall, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Dictionary of English Placenames}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , under Grinshill; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 139. The land went to the Fitz Alans, the tenure under them being subsequently divided. Part of the land of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Grineleshull }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
was held by the Abbot of Haughmond directly from John Fitz Alan, part from the Orleton family (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 76a; the Haughmond Cartulary: Rees, nos. 6, 343-65, 533, 685, 778), while a separate part went to the lords of Stanton-upon-Hine-Heath. Adam }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Orleton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 had granted \'bd
 virgate to Haughmond before the end of the twelfth century; further land held by the Orletons had originally been given to Wombridge Priory but was transferred to Haughmond by the agree
ment of the two priors. It seems that the Orletons made additional grants; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. pp. 142-143; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pimhill Hundred Roll}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 121; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 260b.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The third portion of Grinshill, \'bd hide, was held by the Actons of Acton Reynald (4,3,59) under the Stantons. The two holdings (Acton and Grinshill) are often coupled in later documents; thus in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 962, Rainer }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Acton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Acton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Grinleshul' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
of the barony of John Fitz Alan; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 970; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 76a; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, iv. pp. 231, 235; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 144.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab LAND FOR 2 PLOUGHS. The fact that in the manuscript the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ii }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is in slightly darker ink and there is a larger than normal space between it and }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 car' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
suggests that the main scribe of Great Domesday may have been unsure at first of the number of ploughs in the estimate and so left a space which in the event turned out too large. Compare 4,21,7 land note, 4,23,14 land note and 4,23,16 land note.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 3 FREE MEN; THEY PAY 7s A YEAR. Perhaps three of the four 1066 holders were allowed to stay on as rent-payers. See 3d,5 revenue note on the practice of 'farming' and compare 4,8,2 man note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,16,2\tab FAINTREE. This lay in Chetton Ancient Parish. It was in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086, later in Stottesdon Hundred. The Domesday form }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Faventrei }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
is from Old English}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  fage }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 treo }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ('variegated tree'): Ekwall, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Dictionary of English Placenames}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , under Faintree; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 130. This land is later held
 by serjeanty of finding a foot soldier to serve in the king's army in Wales in wartime; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 144; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. pp. 82b, 108a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 217, 231; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 54, vi. no. 248; Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 159; Purton, 'Manor of Faintree'.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The Domesday estate is represented by Faintree Hall and Faintree Hall Farm (SO6688) and by Lower Faintree (SO6588).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab AS 6 MANORS. The description of Walkelin's estate at Faintree is interrupted at this point by the addition of two holdings of William Pandolf at the foot of folio 257c; see 4,14,28 entry note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THESE THANES WERE FREE. The space of a third of a line left before this statement is due to the repaired hole in the parchment at the top of this folio; see 4,11,5 hole note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank half a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,17\tab OSBERN [* SON OF RICHARD *]. The early descent of Badger (4,17,1 Badger note) suggests that this man was Osbern son of Richard Scrope of Richards Castle; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 65. He also held in chief in Shropshire (SHR 5). For biographical details, see SHR 5 Osbern note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a third of a line after the woodland detail, perhaps for the later insertion of another resource; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,17,1\tab BADGER. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in "Al
nodestreu" Hundred in 1086, later in Brimstree Hundred, before passing into the Liberty of Wenlock. In the thirteenth century it was held by a family named from the vill, at first under Osbern son of Hugh (grandson of Osbern son of Richard, who was probab
ly the Domesday holder), then under the prior of Wenlock: Philip }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Bagesover }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds from the prior in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 85a; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 446, ii. no. 808; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 164b; Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 61; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, x. p. 215; and 4,26,5 Beckbury note. It is sometimes associated with Romsley (WAR 12,9) in later documents.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab BRUNING. The Domesday forms of this name - }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bruning}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bruniht}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  -}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 represent Old English }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bruning}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 210 and \'a7
 76. The Phillimore printed edition has Browning, in line with Brown (for Old English }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Brun}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , which means 'brown'),}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  but the most common Domesday form }{
\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bruning}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  corresponds to the Old English name and so it has been altered to that in the present edition. The Alecto edition has Bruning. }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Compare 4,3,56 Hunning note and 4,18,1 Dunning note on the Domesday forms of 'Hunning' and 'Dunning'. }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 See also HEF 1,25 Bruning note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,17,2\tab 
BROCKTON. This place lay in Sutton Maddock Ancient Parish. It was in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086, later in Brimstree Hundred. Another portion lay in Sutton Maddock manor (4,23,16). After it escheated to the Crown this Brockton became a tenure by serjean
ty (by service at Shrawardine or Montgomery castles), but the later size of the two serjeanties here (4 \'bd virgates) greatly exceeds the 1 virgate 8 acres of the Domesday vill which must thus represent only part of them. In }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 1284 ('Overs' and Brimstree Hundreds), 2 virgates are held by Thomas Russell for service at Montgomery castle and 2 \'bd virgates by Henry }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Fort' }
{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and Philip }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Franlasche }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 for a similar service; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 145, 383; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 225; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 801; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 93.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WHO [IS MENTIONED] ABOVE. The Latin }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 qui sup(ra) }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is too abbreviated: the main scribe of Great Domesday should have written either }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
qui supra dictus est }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 or }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 supradictus Bruniht}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 
8 ACRES. The only other record of land in Shropshire being assessed in terms of acres (rather than just hides and virgates) occurs in 7,4 where the acre is linked with another unusual measurement, the 'ferling' (7,4 acres note). The geld-acre occurred reg
ularly in some counties in Great Domesday; for example in Essex and in Cornwall (though in the latter it was probably rated differently: CON 1,1 acre note).}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab LAND FOR 1 PLOUGH. [\'85]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a space suitable for about five lett
ers after the plough estimate. It is likely that, as he did not leave a space after the hidage in this entry (probably for }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geld'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
see 1,5 hide note), he left a space after the next statement instead, as he did in 4,24,4, which was later filled by scribe B. Compare 4,26,3 land note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,17,3\tab RYTON. This}{\scaps\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 was an Ancient Parish}{\scaps\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 It lay in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086, later in Brimstree Hundred. In the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 971, John }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Ruton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ruton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from the barony of John Fitz Alan and it continued to be held by a family named from the place; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iv. pp. 234, 244; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 80; and 4,25,6 Albrighton note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab VITHFARI. The Domesday forms of this name - }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wifare}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wiuara}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wiuar}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 - represent Old Norse }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Vithfari}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 406. The printed Phillimore edition has the form Wivar, but this has been altered to the Old Norse form for the present edition, as JRM did not pronounce on it. The Alecto edition has Vithfari.
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab There is no known link, tenurial or geographical, between this predecessor of Earl Roger and the two Staffordshire }{\i\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\insrsid4139880 
 holders called Vithfari (STS 11,43. 12,26), the only other occurrences of this name in Domesday, though as both of them had held 'with full jurisdiction' it is possible that they were the same individual.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab However, the three holdings are within a day's journey of each other so it is possible that they were held by one individual }{\i\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\insrsid4139880 
, despite devolving upon three different tenants-in-chief (JP).}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab BRICTWOLD. Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bricstual }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 represents Old English }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Beorhtweald}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 198-99.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab SESTERS. The sester is a measure, sometimes of liquid (often of ho
ney), sometimes of dry (as here). It was of uncertain and probably variable size (see GLS GI note and GLS 19,2 note). It was reckoned at 32 ounces for honey; see Zupko, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 English Weights and Measures}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 155. A sester of grain seems to have been less than a 
peck: WIL 24p. Sometimes the sester payment was commuted: in Wiltshire (WIL 24p) Edward of Salisbury had, among other commodities as his annual payment as sheriff, '16 sesters of honey, or, instead of honey, 16s'. Compare WAR B5 where the Borough of Warwi
ck pays '6 sesters of honey, that is a sester at 15 pence'.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,18\tab ODO [* OF BERNIERES *]. Odo is called Odo }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 miles }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. 30, 33) in connection with his grant of}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  H}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ordley (4,18,1) to Shrewsbury Abbey. He is thought to be the same man as Odo }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Berneris }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (of Berni\'e8
res) who granted land in Broadstone (4,3,9 Odo note) to the abbey early in the twelfth century: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. 15, 43, 258, 262). If so, there are several places called Berni\'e8res which could have been
 his place of origin and that of Hugh of Berni\'e8res. The two men may or may not be related and could be from different places called Berni\'e8res: in the French d\'e9partement of Calvados there is Berni\'e8
res-d'Ailly (arrondissement Caen, canton Morteaux-Couliboeuf), Berni\'e8res-le Patry (arrondissement Vire, canton Vassy) and Berni\'e8res-sur-Mer (arrondissement Caen, canton Douvres-la D\'e9livrande). Further, there is a Berni\'e8res in the French d\'e9
partement of Seine-Maritime (arrondissement Le Havre, canton Bolbec) and a Berni\'e8res-sur-Seine in the French d\'e9partement of Eure (arrondissement Les Andelys, canton Gaillon-Campagne). The origin of Hugh appears to be Berni\'e8
res-sur-Mer; see Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 72; Loyd, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Some Anglo-Norman Families}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 14; Keats-Rohan, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 260-61. For Odo }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 298, prefers Berni\'e8res-sur-Mer and Keats-Rohan, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 308, chooses Berni\'e8res-d'Ailly. This man was apparently also known as Odo of Rushbury from his holding there (4,8,5). However, there was also an Odo }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 clericus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  active in Shropshire at this time; see 4,3,9 Odo note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab The hundredal order of this sub-chapter is as follows (the bracketed numbers are explained in SHR 4 arrangement note):
\par \tab \tab 4,18,1-2 Baschurch Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,18,3 "Merset" Hundred.
\par \tab The last entry is out of sequence, but only the hundred head is a later addition.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,18,1\tab HORDLEY. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Baschurch Hundred in 1086, later in Pimhill Hundred. Odo gave }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hordeleia }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
to Shrewsbury Abbey before the death of Earl Roger: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. xix, xx, 6, 30, 33, 34, 39, 41, 256). In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 76a, Thomas }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Hordileg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 2 hides of the fee of the Abbot of Shrewsbury with suit at the abbot's court of Baschurch; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pimhill Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 121; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 245a; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 122.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab DUNNING. }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The Domesday forms of this name - }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Dunning}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Dunninc}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Donning}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Dunniht}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Donninc}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  - represent Old English }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Dunning}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, 
}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 228 and \'a7 76. The Alecto edition has Dunning.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Compare 4,3,56 Hunning note and 4,17,1 Bruning note.}{
\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,18,2\tab "UDEFORD"}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 AND RUYTON-[ELEVEN-TOWNS]. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Udeford }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
is a lost member of Ruyton. The latter is now an Ancient Parish, strictly Ruyton of the 
Eleven Towns, the eleven being six in Ruyton parish (Ruyton, Coton, Wykey, Shelvock, Shotatton and Eardiston) and five in Felton parish (Felton, Sutton, Haughton, Rednal and Tedsmore). The 'eleven towns' include two Domesday places (West Felton and Wykey:
 4,3,41 and 4,18,3) but even without these, the area is a great increase over the 1 \'bd hides recorded here for }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Udeford }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ruitone }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
in 1086. Ruyton was in Baschurch Hundred in 1086, but seems soon to have been acquired by the Fitz Alans and was moved into their lordship of Ruyton or Oswestry, being held under it by}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Lestrange. It was thus lost to the county until the abolition of the lordships under Henry VIII in 1536; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Miscellaneous}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 112 no. 235; Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, x. p. 111. On the Eleven Towns, see Kenyon, 'Ruyton of the Eleven Towns'. Stanwardine-in-the-Wood (SJ4227), which is later a Fitz Alan possession, may have been a remote part of the manor in 1086. It was in Pimhill Hundred in the thirteenth century, b
ut withdrawn from it and put to Oswestry lordship; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pimhill Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 121; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 76b; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 215; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. no. 685; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 119.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 5 FISHERIES IN THE DUES OF THE VILLAGERS. Latin }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 v. piscari\'ea in censu uillanor}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 um}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ];}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  census }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 has several meanings in Great Domesday, but according to Lennard, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rural England}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 249, this phrase means that the fisheries were rented by the villagers, which is the translation used in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 334. However, there is a difference between what the Latin says and what it may imply, and there is no reason to think that }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 census}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  means 'rent'.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The fisheries will probably have been on the River Perry.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,18,3\tab IN "MERSET" HUNDRED. This was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday in the central margin. It is surrounded on all sides by the same colour of ink as was used for the heading; the }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 I }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Isd' Odo }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 forms most of the surround on the right-hand side, so it
 is clear that the head governs the entry in the right-hand column. See 4,20,15 Baschurch note and 4,21,13 Wrockwardine note for other added hundred heads.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WYKEY. This was a township of the Ancient Parish of Ruyton-Eleven-Towns (see 4,18,2 Ruyton note). I
t lay in "Merset" Hundred in 1086 and followed the same descent as Ruyton, passing into Ruyton and Oswestry lordships and being held by Lestrange under Fitz Alan before being held by John Yonge of the Earl of Arundel. It is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Wyke}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 coupled with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Shelfake }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Shelvock SO3724; see 4,18,2 Ruyton note), in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. (old series) p. 223 (= }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Miscellaneous}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 115 no. 236). See Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 22. On the abolition of the Marcher lordships in 1536 it was returned to Shropshire.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab IT PAYS TAX. Latin }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geld'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  here}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 may abbreviate }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geldant }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 'they pay tax', referring to the 7 hides (compare 4,19,1). The main scribe of Great Domesday briefly omitted }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 7}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geld' }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 berew' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 tacked it on to the end of the plough estimate; compare 4,4,2 pay note.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,19\tab [TUROLD [* OF VERLEY *]. He is called }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Toraldus de Verleio }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. 34, 39); see 4,19,8 Drayton note. According to Tengvik, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 118, he was from Verly in the d\'e9partement of Aisne, France; but he is thought to be more probably from Vesly in the d\'e9
partement of Eure (arrondissement Les Andelys, canton Gisors). A Roger son of Turold gave land at Vesly to the Abbey of Le Tr\'e9port when it was founded }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . 1050 by Rob
ert, Count of Eu, and his wife Beatrice. This Roger was her son by a previous marriage. It is possible that the present Turold, representing the next generation, was a son of that Roger son of Turold and that another Roger son of Turold who died while cro
ssing with the future King William to England in 1066 was this Turold's son; see Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 431.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Most of his Shropshire lands were subsequently grouped together and known as the fee of Chetwynd when they passed to the Chetwynd family
 (named from Chetwynd: 4,19,2) who hold in the thirteenth century under the Fitz Alans. See Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 45, viii. p. 82.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab T}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 he hundredal order of this sub-chapter is as follows (the bracketed numbers are explained in SHR 4 arrangement note):
\par \tab \tab 4,19,1-6 Wrockwardine Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,19,7-8 Hodnet Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,19,9-10 Baschurch Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,19,11 "Alnodestreu" Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,19,12-13 Condover Hundred.
\par \tab This order represents a major departure from the standard sequence.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,19,1\tab LONGFORD. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. Land at }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Langanford}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  was left to Burton Abbey }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . 1003 in the will of Wulfric Spot: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Early Charters of the West Midlands}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 149 no. 144 (= Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Anglo
-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , no. 1536). This was possibly at Longford in Shropshire, but if so there is no other trace of any connection with Burton Abbey.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Longford did not pass to the Chetwynds but the holders in the thirteenth century were a family called }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Brinton}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  de Brympton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 or }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Brompton}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. no. 504, Adam }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Brympton }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Longeford }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 which is described as an escheat of Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Betlehem }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Bell\'eame), Earl of Shrewsbury. The same Adam holds }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Longheford }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in chief from the king in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 55b; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 964; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 221, 228, 237; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 126, viii. no. 9. In the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 114, Longford's members are given as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Brocketon }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Brockton SJ7216; see 4,12,1 Brockton note) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Chrestill' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(Cheswell SJ7116). It is likely that the distant outlier at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Sturcheley }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Stirchley SJ6906) and the place called }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Culmayre }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (unidentified), held in the }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 118, by the Abbot of Buildwas from Robert Corbet and by him from Adam }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Brimton}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
were also members; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 55a; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 222, 227; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 354; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 357 no. iii; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 260b; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 191; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 114; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 185.
\par \tab \tab A place called }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Styrcleage}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (Stirchley) and one called Longford were given to Burton Abbey }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
1003 in the will of Wulfric Spot: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Early Charters of the West Midlands}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 149 no. 144 (= Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , no. 1536 =}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 Charters of Burton Abbey}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , no. 29, see no. 28), but there is no later trace of a Burton Abbey holding at either of these Shropshire places. On the other hand the
 partially geographical arrangement of the places granted and the fact that Stirchley and Longford are adjacent in the charter is in favour of their identification with places in Shropshire; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, xi. p. 185; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Charters of Burton Abbey}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. xxix.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab On the whole manor, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 101.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab EARL EDWIN. See 3b,3 Edwin note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THEY PAY TAX. Scribe B inserted }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geld'}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  over an erasure. For his other contributions on the taxability of a holding, see 4,1,1 pay note. On what mi
ght have been erased here, see 1,5 pay note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab TWO MEN-AT-ARMS. They were perhaps the brothers Hunning and Wulfgeat because of the later descent of the land; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, viii. p. 114.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,19,2\tab CHETWYND. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. This manor becomes the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 caput }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
of the fee of Chetwynd (4,19 Turold note) held under Fitz Alan. This fee grouped most of the vills held by Turold in 1086. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 57a, John }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
de Chetewynde }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 9 hides in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Chetewynde }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from John Fitz Alan; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 962, 970; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 227; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. no. 386. The Domesday manor expanded by absorbing vills that were independent in 1086. Thus in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 220, the members of Chetwynd are given as }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Stocton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Stockton in Woodcote, SJ7716. Chetwynd Aston is nearby; see 4,1,23 Edgmond note); }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pyvelesdon }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Puleston: 4,19,3); }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ethelarton }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Ellerton SJ7125, probably part of Sambrook); }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Sambrok }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Sambrook: 4,19,4); }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bardeston }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Bearstone: 4,19,7); }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Howelye }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Howie: 4,19,5); half of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pykelesleye }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Pixley SJ6825, possibly part of Sambrook in 1086); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 112. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Chetewynde }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is associated with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pichford }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Pitchford: 4,19,12) in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 236. On the whole manor, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 81.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab COUNTESS GODIVA. See 4,1,21 countess note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WHICH PAY[S]. Latin }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 redd' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 here}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 could abbreviate either }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 reddens}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 singular, referring to the mill only, or }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 reddentes}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
plural, referring to the mill with the 2 fisheries. The render of money and eels does not point to the plural because eels were a common payment from mills: 1,7 mill note. Compare 4,11,1 where the verb in a similar construction is definitely plural, where
as in 3d,2 it is singular.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 64 STICKS OF EELS. That is, 1600 eels, at 25 eels to a stick.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab A SMALL WOOD [***]. As there is no dot after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 silua parua }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
and the remaining third of the line is blank, the main scribe of Great Domesday may have intended to add further details of this wood or other resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}. On Latin }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 silua parua}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , see 4,1,4 wood note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,19,3\tab PULESTON. This place was in Chetwynd Ancient Parish. It lay in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. It was regarded as a member of Chetwynd manor (4,19,2) in the thirteenth century.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab EARL EDWIN. See 3b,3 Edwin note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The Ordnance Survey facsimile fails to reproduce the abbreviation line in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 com'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see 3f,7 plough note on similar imperfect reproductions i
n this facsimile. It is very faint in the manuscript and is barely visible in the Alecto facsimile.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WHICH PAYS TAX. Scribe B added }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 gld'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  in a space left for it by the main scribe of Great Domesday after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hida}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  (see 1,5 hide note). }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 For scribe B's other contributions on the taxability of a holding, see 4,1,1 pay note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,19,4\tab SAMBROOK. This was in Chetwynd Ancient Parish. It lay in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. It became a member of the manor of Chetwynd (4,19,2) and it is probable t
hat two other members of the manor, Ellerton and half of Pixley, were a part of Sambrook in 1086; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 93.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 \'bd HIDES [***]. In the manuscript there is an erasure of some four letters after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 dim'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
probably of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geld' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 as the remains of the 'tail' of a }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 g }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
can be seen in the correct place. Compare 4,27,2 hides note, 4,27,3 hide note, 4,27,9 hide note and 4,27,29 hides note. On spaces left after the hidage by the main scribe of Great Domesday, see 1,5 hide note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining third of a line after the mill detail, perhaps for the later insertion of the woodland or other resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,19,5\tab HOWLE. This place was in Chetwynd Ancient Parish. It was in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. It was counted as a part of Chetwynd manor in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 220; see 4,19,2 Chetwynd note. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 386 (of John }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Chetewinde}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ), records that of the 8 virgates, 4 virgates are held of the Abbot of Haughmond and 4 virgates of the Abbot of Lilleshall; see the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, nos. 461, 643-46, 650, 782); Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 91.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab BATSVEINN. Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Batsuen }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 represents Old Norse }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Batsveinn }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 which means 'boatman': von Feilitzen, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 193. This is the only occurrence of this name in Domesday Book.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WHICH PAY TAX. Scribe B inserted }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geld'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  over an erasure. It would seem likely that the main scribe of Great Domesday had written }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
hid\'ea }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 at the beginning of the second line of this entry, then erased it and put it at the end of the first line (it overruns the side marginal ruling) so as to leave a space for the possible later insertion of }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geld'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . On the spaces he left after the hidage, see 1,5 hide note. For scribe B's other additions of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geld'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , see 4,1,1 pay note.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining half a line after the mill detail, perhaps for the later insertion of the woodland or other resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,19,6\tab 
LAWLEY. This was formerly a township of Wellington Ancient Parish. It is now a separate Ecclesiastical Parish. It lay in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. William Pandolf held the other part (4,14,21). In }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 p. 56a, Robert Corbet (of Moreton Corbet) holds half of the vill of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Laneleg' }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of the fee of John }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Chetewind}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and of Robert's share the nuns of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bruwod }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Brewood) hold 1 virgate. In the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 112, Robert Corbet holds half the vill from William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Hodnet}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 635; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 219; Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. pp. 37, 99; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 277; and 4,1,4 Hodnet note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HUNNING <OF LAWLEY>. See 4,3,56 Hunning note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,19,7\tab BEARSTONE. The Domesday name-form is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bardestune}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , on which see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 34. It lay in the Ancient Parish of Mucklestone, of which the bulk lay in Staffordshire, although Bearstone was and is in Shropshire. Bearstone is now a separate
 Ecclesiastical Parish, but it lies in Woore Civil Parish. It was in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred and is treated in the thirteenth century as a member of Chetwynd manor; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 372; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 386; and 4,19,2 Chetwynd note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,19,8\tab [LITTLE] DRAYTON. Little Drayton was formerly in the Ancient Parish of Drayton-in-Hales, which is also known as Market Drayton. It is now a separate Ecclesiastical Parish. For Market Dr
ayton and another part of Little Drayton, see 4,14,9. The vill lay in Hodnet Hundred in 1086 but was later in 'Bradford' Hundred. The manor was a gift of Turold }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Verleio }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(of Verley) to Shrewsbury Abbey: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. 34, 39). It was thenceforth treated as a member of Betton (4,23,9); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 445; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 519 no. ii; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 261a; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire
}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 370.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab COUNTESS GODIVA. See 4,1,21 countess note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,19,9\tab MORETON [CORBET]. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Baschurch Hundred in 1086, but it was later in 'Bradford' Hundred. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 55a, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Morton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in 'Bradford' Hundred, 1 hide, is a fee of John }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Chetewind}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 221, Robert Corbet holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Morton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 'with members' from Reginald }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Chetewinde }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 who holds from Richard Fitz Alan. The members are given as }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Preston }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 'in Pimhill' (Preston Brockhurst: 4,19,10) and }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ivelithe }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 'in Brimstree' (Evelith SJ7405); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 227; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 116; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 635; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, x. p. 181. Evelith is remote from Moreton and may have been a member of some other manor (for example, of Shifnal: 4,9,1) in 1086. It is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Yvelye}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 1 virgate, held by Robert Corbet from the lord of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Morton Tubaud }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (i.e. Moreton Toret) in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 226.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HUNNING <OF LAWLEY> ... WITH HIS BROTHER. According to Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi
ii. p. 114, Hunning's brother was called Wulfgeat; both of them had held Preston Brockhurst (4,19,10); see 4,3,56 Hunning note.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The Ordnance Survey facsimile fails to reproduce the abbreviation line in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 f're }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 which is faint in the manuscript; see 3f,7 plou
gh note. It is just visible in the Alecto facsimile.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THEY HELD IT THEMSELVES; THEY WERE FREE MEN. The main scribe of Great
\par \tab Domesday added }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ipsi tenuer'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  in the left margin of the manuscript hard up against the}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab inner edge of the parchment. It is rather blurred and there are no transposition signs to}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab direct it to its correct position in the entry, but the ink box that he drew round three sides of the insertion link it to the beginning of the second line before }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 7 lib}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 er}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 i ho}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 min}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
es fuer}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 unt}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ], which was corrected by him from the singular }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 lib}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 er}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ] }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ho}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 mo}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ] }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 fuit}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
. The singular is acceptable grammatically because 'with his brother' is not part of the subject. See 4,19,9 1066 note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THEY HELD IT ... BEFORE 1066. The main scribe of Great Domesday probably added this in the space left after the end of the entry when he found that he had omitted }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 T.R.E. }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from the marginal insertion (see 4,19,9 themselves note) and had no room to add it there.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,19,10\tab PRESTON [BROCKHURST]. This place was in the Ancient Parish of Moreton Corb
et (see 4,19,9). It lay in Baschurch Hundred in 1086 and was later in Pimhill Hundred, whereas Moreton Corbet itself went into 'Bradford' Hundred. For another part of Preston, see 4,23,15. Preston followed the same descent as Moreton Corbet, being held in
 }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 75a (Pimhill Hundred), as 1 \'bd hides in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Preston Toret }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 by Robert Corbet of the fee of John }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Chetewynde}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 with service at Oswestry (implying a Fitz Alan overlordship); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pimhill Hundred Roll}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 120; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 178; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 95.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HUNNING <OF LAWLEY>. See 4,3,56 Hunning note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 \'bd HIDES AS 2 MANORS. See 4,7,5 hide note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a quarter of a line after the villagers, probably for the later insertion either of more of the population or of a resource; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,19,11\tab WILLEY. This was an Ancient Parish. It was in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086, later in Munslow Hundred and Wenlock Liberty. Willey passed from Turold 's
 heirs to the fee held by the Chetwynd family under the Fitz Alan barony of Oswestry, and was granted to Wenlock Priory, being held under it in 1255 by Andrew son of Nicholas as }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wilileg'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 It is often coupled with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Linleye }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Linley; see 3c,2 Wenlock note); }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 228; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 45; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 450.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HUNNING <OF LAWLEY>. See 4,3,56 Hunning note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THE ORDNANCE SURVEY FACSIMILE does not reproduce either the dot after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 eo }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 or the one after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 car' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
in the line below. See 3f,7 plough note. They are very faint in the Alecto facsimile. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de eo}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  over an erasure and it is blurred, as is the stop after it.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,19,12\tab PITCHFORD. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Condover Hundred in 1086 and later. In the thirteenth century it was held from the Chetwynds by a family named from the place under Fitz Alan of Oswestry. In }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 62b, Ralph son of Nicholas (otherwise Ralph of Pitchford) holds 3 hides in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pich' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of the fee of John }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Chetewind}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 William Fitz Alan is overlord in 1346 (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 236) and the Bishop of 'Chester' had an interest here in 1316 (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 230); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 286, ii. no. 569; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 267; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 p. 115; and 4,19,2 Chetwynd note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining quarter of a line after the woodland detail, perhaps for the later insertion of another resource; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,19,13\tab WIGWIG. This was in Much Wenlock Ancient Parish. It lay in Condover Hundred in 1086 and later, before being absorbed by Wenlock Liberty. After the forfeiture of the fief by Earl Roger's son in 1102, Tur
old became a tenant-in-chief. Wigwig was first given by Robert son of Turold to Shrewsbury Abbey (as}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Wicewica }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
in the Shrewsbury Cartulary: Rees, p. 34, see p. 39), but was later rented from it by the prior of Wenlock who drew it into his Liberty. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wigewig }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 was held from the prior in 1255 (}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 84b); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 63a, 91b; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 232; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 164b; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 265; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 88, x. p. 421; and 3c,2 Wenlock note. The estate included Horner (SJ6101).}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab LAND FOR 2 PLOUGHS. IT IS THERE. Latin }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 T'ra \'e7 .ii. car'. Ibi \'e7}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \'e7 }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
may be a scribal error for }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 sunt }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ('land for 2 ploughs. They are there ... '), but because of the villagers' \'bd plough this would make
 the ploughs on the manor exceed the estimate and, though in other Great Domesday counties the plough estimate is often exceeded (see DEV 1,3 land note for the frequent use of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 tamen }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
in such cases), in Shropshire the only other instances of this are possibly in 6,30 and 7,4; see 6,30 ploughs note and 7,4 servants note. It is more likely, therefore, that the scribe}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 omitted }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 una}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \'e7 }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (making the reading 'Land for 2 ploughs. In lordship l'). There is no}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 sign of correction of the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ii }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (from }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 i) }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in the plough estimate.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining third of a line after the woodland detail, perhaps for the later insertion of other resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,20\tab PICOT [* OF SAI *]. }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 He was Robert de Sai, nicknamed Picot, from Sai }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in the French d\'e9partement of }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Orne (arrondissement Argentan, canton Argentan-Est). His wife was call
ed Adeloia, their sons were Robert and Henry and his brother was Payne of Sai. Another relative, Osmelin of Sai, may be the plain Osmelin who held of Earl Roger in Sussex. Picot was a benefactor of Earl Roger\rquote s foundation of Saint-Martin-de-S\'e9
es. His successor was his son Henry, baron of Clun. See Loyd, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Some Anglo-Norman Families}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 96; Sanders, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 English Baronies}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 112; }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 p. 325.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab With the Corbet brothers and William Pandolf he is mentioned in Orderic Vitalis, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Ecclesiastical History }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(Chibnall, ii. pp. 220-21, see also ii. pp. 420-21) as one of Earl Roger's leading men in Shropshire. Like the lands of Roger and Robert (4,4 Roger note; 4,5 Robert note), his lay on the border with Wales; these holdings formed the 'barony' or 'hono
ur' of Clun. The barons of Clun were strongly represented in Leintwardine Hundred and paramount in "Rinlau" Hundred. In this latter hundred only four manors (Lydham, Lydbury North, Wentnor and Choulton: 4,1,14. 2,1. 4,4,4. 4,5,6) were not held by them.

\par \tab \tab From Picot the lands passed to his son Henry, then to Elias whose heir was his daughter Isabel. She married William (I) Fitz Alan, then Geoffrey de Ver, then William Botterell. After her death }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 1199 the barony went to the Fitz Alans and joined their barony of Oswestry; see Sanders, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 English Baronies}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 112; and 4,3 Reginald note. Most of Picot's 1086 estates can be identified later in the various Fitz Alan Inquisitions and Surveys; see especially }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, i. no. 812; Clough, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Fitz Alan Surveys}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 51-65.
\par \tab \tab Before the end of the twelfth century Isabel }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Sai }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 had given the 
churches of Clun (4,20,8), Llanfair Waterdine (6,22), Clunbury (4,20,4), Clunton (4,20,3), Hopton (4,20,12), Edgton (4,20,14) and Sibdon Carwood (4,20,7) to Wenlock Abbey: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, v. p. 76 no. iv.
\par \tab \tab On the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Sai}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  family, see Loyd, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Some Anglo-Norman Families}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 9.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab The hundredal order of this sub-chapter is as follows (the bracketed numbers are explained in SHR 4 arrangement note):
\par \tab \tab 4,20,1 Condover Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,20,2-14 "Rinlau" Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,20,15-16 Baschurch Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,20,17 ["Culvestan"?] Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,20,18-27 Leintwardine Hundred}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,20,1\tab BROMPTON. This place was in Berrington Ancient Parish. It lay in Condover Hundred in 1086 and later; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lay Subsidy Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 Shropshire (1327)}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Condover Hundred}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 385; and 4,5,5 Brompton note. Picot }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Sai }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 granted the tithes }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of Brantone }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Phitesoth }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Fitz: 4,20,15) to Shrewsbury Abbey soon after Earl Roger's death, and, in the time of Henry I, Henry }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Sai }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 exchanged the whole manor of}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Brompton for Cheney Longville (4,27,32); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 260a; the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. 34, 39, 42, 45, 53, etc.). The abbey continued to hold it until the Dissolution. On the manor as a whole, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 169; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 19.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ERNWY}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  <OF BROMPTON>. }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 On the name Ernwy, see 4,4,12 Ernwy note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 
The name Ernwy or Ernwin occurs eight times in central Shropshire and nowhere else within 50 miles; it probably represents two or three individuals. The pre-Conquest holder of the modest, shared property at Brompton might h
ave been connected to those of Pontesbury or Easthope; but there are no discernible links to confirm this, and the Ernwys outside the county were too distant to be plausible related (JP).}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 3 PLOUGHMEN. The Ordnance Survey facsimile does not reproduce the top half of the last minim of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 nor the dot after it, making the number look like }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ii}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,. In the manuscript the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii. }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
is perfectly clear, as it is in the Alecto facsimile; see 3f,7 plough note for other shortcomings of the Ordnance Survey facsimile.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,20,2\tab MYNDTOWN. The Domesday form is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Munete}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 It is named from }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
La Munede}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 the Long Mynd. It was an Ancient Parish and lay in "Rinlau" Hundred in 1086, later in Purslow Hundred. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum
}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 77a, William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de La Munede }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 has \'bd hide in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 La Munede }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
from John Fitz Alan with suit at Clun. It is 'the town of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 La Munede' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 812. See }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 963; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 233, 238; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 273.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining third of a line after the hedged enclosure, perhaps for the later insertion of the woodland or another resource; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}
{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,20,3\tab CLUNTON. The Domesday form is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Clutune}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 with a nunnation mark
 apparently omitted. It was in Clunbury Ancient Parish (see 4,20,4) but is now in Clunbury Civil Parish. It lay in "Rinlau" Hundred in 1086, later in Purslow Hundred, and seems to have merged with Hopesay manor; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 251; and 4,20,6 Hopesay note and 4,20,8 Clun note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining half a line after the hedged enclosures, perhaps for the later insertion of the woodland or other resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,20,4\tab CLUNBURY. The place-name may indicate that it was named from a fortified manor, there being no evidence of a fortress: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 92.

\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in "Rinlau" Hundred in 1086, later in Purslow Hundred. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 963, Hugh }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Anglicus }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
holds 1 fee of the barony of Clun in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Clounebur'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , while in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 238, the same holding is named as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Clunbury}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Bromton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Little Brompton SO3681), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Streford }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Strefford: 4,3,47) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Marsh }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Marsh; see
 4,3,47 Strefford note), formerly held from William Fitz Alan by Hugh }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Anglicus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 812; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 233; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 246.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THIS MANOR HAS NEVER PAID TAX ... NOT HIDATED. Nee
n Sollars (5,8) was the only other manor in Shropshire which was never hidated and did not pay tax, but unlike Clunbury it had most of the usual manorial details. On land yet assessed in hides, see C 13 hides note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THERE WERE 6 PLOUGHS. Presumably this is a reference to 1066; see 2,2 before note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,20,5\tab KEMPTON. This place lay in Clunbury Ancient Parish. It was in "Rinlau" Hundred in 1086, then in Purslow Hundred and seems to have become a member of Hopesay (4,20,6 Hopesay note. 4,20,8 Clun note); see Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 251.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 2 MANORS. It is not clear from the Latin whether all the details of lordship ploughs, slaves and other population and resources refer to both Clunbury and Kempton, though it seems likely in view of the omission of
 such details from 4,20,4. Compare 4,23,8 and 4,23,8 manors note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining quarter of a line after the hedged enclosures, perhaps for the later insertion of another resource (see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}
), though he could have wanted to put the value on a separate line as it referred to the preceding entry as well.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab VALUE OF THESE 2 MANORS BEFORE 1066 \'a38. As the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  value of Clunbury has already been given in the preceding entry as \'a3
4, the value of Kempton would seem also to have been \'a34.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,20,6\tab HOPESAY. Hopesay (Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hope}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ) is}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
named from Picot of Say or his descendants. It was an Ancient Parish and lay in "Rinlau" Hundred in 1086, later in Purslow Hundred. It became an important manor of the barony of Clun and absorbed other vills that were separate in 1086. Thus in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 77a, John Fitz Alan holds 4 hides in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hope de Say}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Eston' }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Aston-on-Clun SO3981), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Kempeton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Kempton: 4,20,5), and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Clonton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Clu
nton: 4,20,3) of the barony of Clun; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 233; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 252; and 4,20,8 Clun note.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining half a line after the hedged enclosures, perhaps for the later insertion of the woodland or other resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,20,7\tab SIBDON [CARWOOD]. The Domesday form is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Sibitune}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . This was a chapelry of Clun Ancient Parish but is now a separate Civil Parish and Ecclesiastical Parish. T
he modern place-name is a fusion of two places: there are an Upper and a Lower Carwood at SO4085 in the parish. This vill was in "Rinlau" Hundred in 1086, later in Purslow Hundred. Picot may have given two-thirds of the demesne tithes of }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Sibbeton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 to Shrewsbury Abbey in the time of Earl Hugh: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. 7-8, 276-77, 301-302, 351-52). The manor itself became part of the barony of Clun. In }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 77a, Roger }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bardolf }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 1 hide in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bilbeton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
from John Fitz Alan, through his wife, guardian of the son of Henry }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Silbeton}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 with suit at Clun. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Sibeton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 with half of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wistanstowe }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Wistanstow: 9,1) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Brome }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Broome SO4080) are held by John }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Sibeton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from William Fitz Alan in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 238; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 963; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 268.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining half a line after the woodland detail, perhaps for the later insertion of other resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,20,8\tab CLUN. This was an Ancient Parish. It was in "Rinlau" Hundred in 1086, later in Purslow Hundred. It was }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 caput }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
of Picot's, then Fitz Alan's, barony of Clun: in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 684, John Fitz Alan holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Clawne }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
township from the king. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. no. 90, Richard Earl of Arundel holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Clone }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
castle and manor and receives rents from the following places which were members of the barony: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Aston }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Aston on Clun; see 4,20,6 Hopesay note); }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hope Say }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Hopesay: 4,20,6); }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Berley }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Barlow: 4,20,10); }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Clunton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Clunton: 4,20,3); }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Kempeton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Kempton: 4,20,5); }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Acton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Acton SO3184); }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Dounherberd }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Guilden Down SO3082; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Dune juxta Clune }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 held by Giles }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Berkele }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 812, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Gilesdoune }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Miscellaneous}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 111; see Clough, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Fitz Alan Surveys}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 58, 177); }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Aderdeley }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (now Llanhedrick, SO2884); }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bikedon }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Bicton SO2882); }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hodicote }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Whitcott? SO2782); }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Newcastle }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Newcastle SO2482). Acton was \'bd
 hide according to }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 77a. See }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 812; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 233. Newcastle and Llanhedrick with Bicton were part of the manor of the Five Towns belonging to the Clun barony. This manor also contained Whitcott (see abov
e) and Keysett (SO2782): Morgan, 'Montgomeryshire Territorial Divisions', p. 34. The }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Westone }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, i. no. 812 (p. 280), may well be Weston}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (SO2781) and so another member of Clun.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab It is not certain that Clun manor extended so far west in 1086 as to include the area of Bettws-y-Crwyn Ancient Parish: \{Introduction: County Boundary\}.
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Mainstone (SJ2787) was a chapelry later attached to Clun and then a separate Civil Parish. However, the serttlements that can be identified as lying in its area were part of Montgomery (4,1,35-36) in 1086.
\par \tab \tab The church of Clun went to Wenlock Priory (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 167a). On the manor as a whole, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 255.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab On the dissolution of the Marcher lordships and the shiring of Wales in 1536, Clun was briefly placed in Montgomeryshire, but returned to Shropshire in 1546.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab On the castle at Clun, which probably dates from the late eleventh century, see King, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Castellarium Anglicanum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 423.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab MILL WHICH SERVES THE COURT. That is, it provided grain for the lord's house, the court of the manor; see 1,7 mill note and 3c,8 court note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab PLOUGHMEN ... VILLAGERS ... SMALLHOLDERS. Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 bouar'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 uill'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
bord' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 may abbreviate the accusative }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 bouarios}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  uillanos }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 bordarios }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and thus be the objects of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 h}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 abe}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 nt }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
earlier in the line; compare 2,2 villagers note, 4,1,19 villagers note, 4,3,29 villagers note and 6,11 villagers note. On }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Waleis }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 for }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Walenses}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 see 4,3,38 Welshmen note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab CATTLE. The Latin is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 animalia}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 commonly called }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 animalia otiosa }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ('idle animals') elsewhere: see, for example, Exon folio 174b4 = SOM 2,7. These are beef or dairy cattle in contrast to ploughing oxen, although occasionally in Exon and in a few counties in Great Domesday they seem to be oxen 
(DEV 1,3 cattle note). Although cattle and other animals are enumerated in the surviving circuit returns (Exon}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
and Little Domesday), they were normally omitted from Great Domesday, except to make a particular point. Here the cattle were a rent, probably fo
r some land though Domesday does not mention this; they may have been cows, as in the payment of 8 cows from Welshmen in 4,3,42.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,20,9\tab PURSLOW. This place lay in Clunbury Ancient Parish. It was in "Rinlau" Hundred in 1086, then }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 caput }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of Purslow Hundred. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 963, Gilbert }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Bockenhul' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bockenhul'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  (Bucknell; see 4,20,26 Adley note) and }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Posselawe }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from the barony of Clun. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 76b, 77a, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bockenhull }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is 1 hide and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Possel'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  \'bd hide; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 238; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 266.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,20,10\tab BARLOW. This lay in Hopesay Ancient Parish. It was in "Rinlau" Hundred in 1086, later in Purslow Hundred. It pays rent to Clun in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. no. 90 (see 4,20,8 Clun note), but manorially was probably a member of Hopesay (4,20,6); see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 255.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,20,11\tab OBLEY. This place was in Clunbury Ancient Parish. It lay in "Rinlau" Hundred in 1086 and later was a member of the barony and manor of Clun. It appears as }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Obbele }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 812, of John Fitz Alan. See Clough, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Fitz Alan Surveys}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 61; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 245.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THESE LANDS. That is, 4,20,10-11, Barlow and Obley.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,20,12\tab HOPTON [CASTLE]. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in "Rinlau" Hundred in 1086, later in Purslow Hundred. In the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 963, Walter }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Hopton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 2 fees in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hopton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of the barony }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Cloune}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The same man holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hopton'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Bradeford }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(Broadward SO3876) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Coston }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Coston: 4,20,13) in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 77a, with service at Clun. }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hopton}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Chelderlton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Shelderton SO4077; see 4,3,46 Clungunford note) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Coston }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 are held by another Walter }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Hopton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 238. The }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 812, adds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Tattel' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Tately SO4278, part of Clungunford: 4,20,24) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Haggele }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Great Hagley SO3476). See }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 233;}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iv. no. 321; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 255.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,20,13\tab COSTON. This place was in Clunbury Ancient Parish. It lay in "Rinlau" Hundred in 1086, later in Purslow Hundred. It was later associated with Hopton (4,20,12), also held by de Hopton; see }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. no. 75, vii. no. 311; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 251.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a space suitable for about seven letters after the population, rather small for the later insertion of any resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,20,14\tab EDGTON. This was a chapelry of Clun Ancient Parish and is now a separate Civil Parish and Ecclesiastical Parish. It lay in "Rinlau" Hundred in 1086, later in Purslow Hundred. In the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 963, Henry and Nicholas }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Egedon' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hold 1 fee in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Egedon' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of the barony of }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Cloune}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 while in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 77a, Peter }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Bosco }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and Nicholas }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Exedon' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hold 1 hide in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Exedon'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bronselawe }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Brunslow SO3684) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wolureston' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Woolston: 4,20,18) from John Fitz Alan with service at Clun; see }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 233, 238; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 260.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left two-thirds of a line blank after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}. T
he fact that when he added the Baschurch hundred head for the next entry (4,20,15 Baschurch note) he put it mostly in the margin rather than in part of this space (hundred heads were often inserted in convenient spaces in preceding entries) suggests that 
he wanted to leave as large a space as possible.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,20,15\tab IN BASCHURCH HUNDRED. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote this mostly in the outer margin, with a gallows sign separating the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 HVND'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 from the first line of the entry; see 4,20,14 [***] note. As the
 colour of the ink and the pen are the same as for the adjacent text this may be an early addition. For other hundred heads that were added, see 4,18,3 Merset note and 4,21,13 Wrockwardine note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab FITZ. The Domesday form is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Witesot}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of which the second element is Old English }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hoh }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ('a spur of land'), the first element being uncertain. The modern form is drastically shortened: Ekwall, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Dictionary of English Placenames}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , under Fitz; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 132. It was an Ancient Parish, and was in Baschur
ch Hundred in 1086, later in Pimhill Hundred. The manor passed to Isabel }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Say}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
baroness of Clun, then to her descendants by William (I) Fitz Alan. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 75b, Walter }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Hopton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and Thomas }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Costentin }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hold 8 hides in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Fitesho}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 a fee 
of John Fitz Alan with service at Oswestry. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Fittes }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is held by Walter }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Hopton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 231; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pimhill Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 121; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 747. In }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. no. 321, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Fittes }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 includes the hamlets of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Mutton }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Mytton: 3d,5 Mytton note) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Grafton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Grafton SJ4318) .The tithes were given to Shrewsbury Abbey by Picot }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Sai }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (the Shrewsbury Cartulary: Rees, pp. 7, 8, 34, 39, etc.; see 4,20,1 Brompton note), the mill to Haughmond Abbey (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 260b; the Haughmond Cartulary: Rees, nos. 323, 329-32, 1075). On the whole manor, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 144.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HUNNING <OF LAWLEY>. See 4,3,56 Hunning note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,20,16\tab MERRINGTON. The Domesday form is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Gellidone}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Later forms of the name are }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Gulidone}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Murydon }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Muridone}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 336 note 89; Ekwall, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Dictionary of English Placenames}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , under Merrington;}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Place-Names of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 204. Merrington was probably in Baschurch Ancient Parish. It was at first placed in Preston Gubbals Civil Parish, then in Pimhill Civil Parish. It lay in Baschurch Hundred in 1086, later in Pimhill Hundred. Picot }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Sai }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 gave two-thirds of the demesne tithes to Shrewsbury Abbey (the Shrewsbury Cartulary: Rees, pp. 7-8, 43, 45, 276-79, etc.) and the manor itself was later given to Haughmond Abbey. In the }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Pimhill Hundred Roll}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 121, the Abbot of Haughmond holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Meryden }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in free alms by gift of Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Girreis}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 260b; the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, nos. 330, 332, 685, 767, 772-78, 1278-80); Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 154.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HUNNING <OF LAWLEY>. See 4,3,56 Hunning note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,20,17\tab [IN "CULVESTAN"? HUNDRED]. Geographically, Westhope could have lain either in Leintwardine Hundred or "Culvestan" Hundred in 1086; its later situation in Munslow Hundred does not resolve the matter. Eyton (}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 306) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 336 note 90, prefer to assume that the Leintwardine hundred head beneath this entry governs i
t, as sometimes elsewhere in Great Domesday. In this edition a "Culvestan" head has been preferred on the grounds that places in "Culvestan" Hundred precede those in Leintwardine at 5,3 and 6,10. Moreover, a space may have been left for a hundred head: 4,
20,17 Almund note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WESTHOPE. This place was a township in Diddlebury Ancient Parish and remains in the Civil Parish of that name. It may have lain in "Culvestan" Hundred and was later in Munslow Hundred. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 71a, John Fitz Alan holds 1 hide from the king in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Westhop'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 648; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 306.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ALMUND HELD IT. [***].The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the rest of the line (suitable for some 17 letters) after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 tenuit.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
. It is quite likely that it was left for a hundred head like other spaces at the end of the first line of an entry (4,1,22 Earl note) as one may be missing (4,20,17 Culvestan note). However, it is possible that the space was left for }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 p}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ro}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  uno manerio}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see 4,14,25 Gamal note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 4 PLOUGHS. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iiii }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 has been corrected from }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 by the addition of a final minim, under
 which can be seen the original dot.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank two-thirds of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,20,18\tab IN LEINTWARDINE HUNDRED.
 There are two unidentified manors belonging to Clun barony in 1086 in this hundred (4,20,19;21). In later records there are estates in this hundred that may correspond to these unidentified manors, have been parts of them or be members of other Clun bara
ony manors in this hundred. They were at }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 La Stowe }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Stowe SO3173), \'bd hide held in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 76b, by the prior of Great Malvern from John Fitz Alan with suit at Clun; and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Weston' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Weston SO3273), also \'bd hide, held by Brian }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Bromton'}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 963; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 233, 238; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 291. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 812 p. 280, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Weston }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is associated with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Brompton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Brampton Bryan) held by Brian }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Brompton}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Brampton Bryan (6,23) is held under Ralph of Mortimer in Domesday but this may be another part of the vill, held under the Clun barony (see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 244), or a mistaken inclusion. Another manor may be }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Skyborre }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Skyborry Green SO2674 and Nether Skyborry SO2773): Clough, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Fitz Alan Surveys}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 60.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab On Stow and Weston, see 4,20,26 Adley note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WOOLSTON. At first sight, Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wistanestune }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
is difficult to accept as a predecessor of Woolston (in Wistanstow Ancient Parish) but it probably shows confusion with the parish name: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 324. }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wolureston'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 held from the barony of Clun, is later associated with Edgton; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 308; and 4,20,14 Edgton note. Woolston lay in Leintwardine Hundred in 1086, later in Purslow Hundred.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 
SPIRTES THE PRIEST. See 3d,7 Spirtes note. He was a canon of St Mary's, Bromfield, from whom he had held 10 hides (3d,7). He had also Wistanstow from St Alkmund's Church (9,1). Since Woolston was in Wistanstow Ancient Parish it is like
ly that it too had belonged to St Alkmund's and that either Domesday fails to mention this or its alienation had been concealed. See 9,1 Wistanstow note and SHR 3g St Alkmund's note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab LAND FOR 8 PLOUGHS. [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left the re
maining quarter of a line blank after the plough estimate. Nothing is obviously missing from the entry; compare 7,6 ploughs note and 3f,2 church note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab A PRIEST. The church was probably at Wistanstow (9,1), no Norman or earlier church being known at Woolston; see Lewis, 'Introduction', }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Shropshire Domesday}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 24.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,20,19\tab "CAURTUNE".}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 This former possession of St Alkmund's Church has not been traced, although it is probably the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Cauton }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 that appears in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 812, of John Fitz Alan, held by the prior of Brampton. See Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 309; and 9,1 Wistanstow note and SHR 3g St Alkmund's note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab PICOT [* OF SAI *] HOLDS IT WRONGFULLY. Picot is holding both churchland and almsland. See Fleming, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday Book and the Law}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 226 no. 1330.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,20,20\tab LEINTWARDINE. This was an Ancient Parish. There seems to be no later trace of a holding of Clun barony here; these 3 virgates, which may have been alienated from the manor of Leintwardine (6,11) held by Edward the 
Confessor, were probably recombined with it (forming a five-hide unit) and followed its descent to the Mortimers of Wigmore; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, xi. p. 321; and 6,11 Leintwardine note. By being drawn into a Marcher lordship, Leintwardine 
was effectively taken from Shropshire. At the dissolution of these lordships in 1536, Leintwardine itself was placed in Herefordshire, though the Ancient Parish was divided between Herefordshire and Shropshire: \{Introduction: County Boundary\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab FULCO [* OF LE PIN *]. See 4,3,46 Fulco note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,20,21\tab "CHINBALDESCOTE". This is an unidentified place that lay in Leintwardine Hundred in1086. It might be represented later by Halford and Dinchope, in Halford parish, which were held by St Mary of Bromfield according 
to the confirmation charter of Henry III, but these may well have been outliers of Bromfield itself; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 310; and 3d,6 Bromfield note.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,20,22\tab MENUTTON. The Domesday form is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Munetune}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . Menutton was formerly in Clun A
ncient Parish and remains in the Civil Parish of that name. A manor of the same Domesday name (now Minton: 4,28,4) also lay in Leintwardine Hundred, but there is no later evidence to associate Minton with Clun barony. Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 311, left this manor unidentified, but a }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Munetone }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
occurs in several Fitz Alan Surveys and is probably to be identified as Menutton which lay close to several other Fitz Alan manors. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Munetone }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is found in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 812 (of John Fitz Alan). It is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Moneton' subtus Porteloke }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Purlogue SO2876) in 1272 (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Close Rolls}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Henry III (AD 1268-1272)}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 506) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Munetone }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in Clough, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Fitz Alan Surveys}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 60. On the name-form, see}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 201.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,20,23\tab LURKENHOPE?. If correctly identified, Lurkenhope lay in Stowe Ancient Parish. The Domesday name-form is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Edretehope}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 the first element perhaps being from Edric, the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 T.R.E. }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holder. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Edretehope }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
lay in Leintwardine Hundred in 1086. It was left unidentified by Eyton (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 311), but identified by }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 336, as possibly Hopebendrid, a township which includes Chapel Lawn and Pentre and lay in Clun parish. This is found as }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Obbendrif }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 812 p. 281 (of John Fitz Alan), and as }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Owendriffe }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in vol. iv. no. 235, and as }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Owendrisse }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Close Rolls}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Henry III (AD 1268-1272)}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 p. 506. However, other forms are needed to convince that this is really a place-name derived from Old English }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hop }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
rather than a later assimilation to 'Hope'. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 152, considers possible Hobendrid (SO3076, the Hopebendrid identified by }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire
}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ) or Hobarris and further suggests that Hobendrid and Hobarris (SO317
8) might be later divisions of the same Domesday estate, though they appear to be named from different 'Hopes' (that is, valleys). Being close to other Clun barony holdings in both "Rinlau" and Leintwardine Hundreds, these are a possible identification. H
owever, among the members of Clun barony in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 812 of John Fitz Alan, is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Larcwenhope }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Larquenhopp' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Close Rolls}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Henry III (AD 1268-1272)}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 506), that is Lurkenhope in Stowe parish, a more probable identification, if }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Edretehope}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  simplified to Hope after 1086 and later acquired a different prefix.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,20,24\tab CLUNGUNFORD. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Leintwardine Hundred in 1086 and was later in Purslow Hundred. The modern form represents the addition of Gunward's name to Domesday }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Clone}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 963, Simon }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
de Hauborthin }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds \'bd fee in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Cloune Goneford }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of the barony of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Cloune}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 while }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Cluna' Gonnef}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Abbecot' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Abcott SO3978) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Routon'}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  (Rowton SO4180), 1 hide, are held by the guardian of Simon's heir from John Fitz Alan in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 77a; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids
}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 233, 238; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 297; and 4,20,12 Hopton note. For another part of the manor, see 4,3,46.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab GUNNVARTH. On this name, see 4,3,46 Gunnvarth note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab FULCO [* OF LE PIN *]. See 4,3,46 Fulco note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab AT 32d. The main scribe of Great Domesday added this in the outer margin of the manuscript; he drew a gallows sign round }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 denar'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  to separate it from the adja
cent text.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,20,25\tab BEDSTONE. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Leintwardine Hundred in 1086, later in Purslow Hundred. The evolution of the Domesday name }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Betietetune }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
to Bedstone is difficult, but not impossible: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 35. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 76b, John }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Gay }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds from John Fitz Alan in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Gay }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Jay SO3974), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bedeston' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bekegay }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Beckjay SO3977) with service at Clun; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 963; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 238; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 489; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, xi. p. 302.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab FULCO [* OF LE PIN *]. See 4,3,46 Fulco note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,20,26\tab ADLEY. Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Edelactune}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Now Adley Moor. For the name-form, see 6,27 Adley note. Adley was a township of Bucknell Ancient Parish but is now in Buckton and
 Coxall Civil Parish in Herefordshire. Buckton and Coxall originated as a township of Bucknell Ancient Parish. Adley was in Leintwardine Hundred in 1086 and later in Purslow Hundred. Neither Adley nor }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Edelactune }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is found among the later possessions of the lords of Clun. On the other hand, in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 76b, Gilbert }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Bockenhul }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 1 hide in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bockenhull }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Bucknell SO3573 which is nearby) from John Fitz Alan of the barony of Clun. Thus, it is possible that Bucknell has replaced Adley as the n
ame of this holding. The hidage given in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 is a reduction from that of Domesday, but this is consistent with other hidages in Purslow Hundred. Moreover, the next entry in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , for }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Gay}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Bedeston }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bekegay }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (represent
ing Bedstone: 4,20,25), is 1 hide corresponding to the 2 hides of Bedstone in Domesday. Eyton (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, xi. p. 316) identified the later Clun barony holding at Bucknell with Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Buchehale }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (4,14,29; but see 4,14,29 Buchehale note). See }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 963; Clough, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Fitz Alan Surveys}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 51; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 812; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 233; and 4,20,9 Purslow note. Bruce Coplestone-Crow (personal communication) suggests that Adley is represented by the holdings 
of Clun barony at Stow and Weston (4,20,18 Leintwardine note).
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Adley and other adjacent places were drawn into Marcher lordships and on their dissolution in 1536 were placed in Herefordshire.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab BERNARD [* SON OF UNSPAC *]. For this identification, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 242-44.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab LARGELY IS. The Latin for the whole sentence is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wasta fuit 7 est ex parte magna}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
. Two translations are possible: 'It was, and is, largely waste' (as in the Phillimore printed translation) where }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ex parte magna}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 is taken as governing both verbs; and 'It was waste, and largely [still] is' which takes }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ex parte magna}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  only with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 est}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 and suggests some recovery, as for many estates (\{Introduction: Content and Layout\}). The latter translation is, on balance, the more likely: had the main scribe of Great Domesday intended that }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ex parte magna}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  should refer to the situation at both dates, he could have put it at the end of the sentence. However, this suggests a control of his material that he does not always show, so the ques
tion remains open. The Alecto edition has ' It was and is waste for a great part'.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,20,27\tab SELLEY?. Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hibrihteselle }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 lay in Leintwardine Hundred in 1086, but has long been unidentified; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 312. The termination could have survived in Selley (in Llanfair Waterdine), an identification proposed by Noble, 'Offa's Dyke Re-viewed', p. 50, but not apparently accepted by}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. However, no descent for Selley has been found, although it is possibl
e that it was replaced by the nearby Skyborry (4,20,18 Leintwardine note) or by Llanfair Waterdine (6,22 Waterdine note) if part of the latter was ever held by the barony of Clun (4,20 Picot note).}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Selley lay in Llanfair Waterdine which was a township of Clun Ancient Parish, then a separate Civil Parish from 1866.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab FULCO [* OF LE PIN *]. See 4,3,46 Fulco note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,21\tab HELGOT <OF HOLDGATE>. Helgot probably came from R\'e9senlieu in the French d\'e9partement of Orne (arrondissement Argentan, canton Gac\'e9), close to Earl Roger\rquote s vicomt\'e9 of the Hi\'e9
mois. His lands went on to form the barony of Castle Holdgate, named from Holdgate (Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Stantune}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : 4,21,5-6) which is itself named from him. From him they passed to H
erbert his son, then to Herbert\rquote s son, Herbert }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Castello}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  (that is, of Castle Holdgate).}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
His heir Agnes married Robert Mauduit, then Ralph }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Ardene}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Her son Thomas Mauduit inherited the barony in 1204 and his heir William alienated the estates to Richard
 Earl of Cornwall, styled King of Almain, who gave them to the Templars. These withdrew suit of most of the manors from their respective hundreds into their short-lived \lquote Liberty\rquote 
 of Castle Holdgate. Edmund, Earl of Cornwall and son of Richard, held for a short time, then }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
. 1284 the barony passed to Robert Burnell, Bishop of Bath and Wells (1275-1292). The lands then passed to his nephew Philip, then to Philip\rquote s son Edward. Robert de Girros was an important under\-tenant of the barony in the late twelfth cen
tury. On Helgot and the barony, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 52; Sanders, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 English Baronies}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 28; Keats-Rohan, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 246.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab The hundredal order of this sub-chapter is as follows (the bracketed numbers are explained in SHR 4 arrangement note):
\par \tab \tab 4,21,1 Hodnet Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,21,2-6 Patton Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,21,7-9 Condover Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,21,10 Baschurch Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,21,11-13 "Alnodestreu" Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,21,14 [Wrockwardine] Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,21,15-18 "Culvestan" Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,21,19 Leintwardine Hundred.
\par \tab There are two sequences here, but no repetition of hundred heads.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,21,1\tab NORTON[-IN-HALES]. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lay Subsidy Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  (1327)}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Bradford Hundred}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 136. Land at }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Northtune}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  was left to Ufegeat for the ultimate benefit of Burton Abbey in the will of Wulfric Spot }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . 1003: }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Early Charters of the West Midlands}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 149 no. 144 (= Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, no.1536). This was possibly at Norton-in-Hales, but if so there is no other trace of any connection with Burton Abbey.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab After 1086 Herbert son of Helgot gave the manor to Shrewsbury Abbey and it is confirmed by his sons as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Nortona juxta nemus quod Lima dicitur }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ('}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Nortona}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880  near the wood called Lyme'): the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. xix, 2, 4, 33, 38,41, etc.); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 245a; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 366; and 4,23,9 Betton note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab AZUR. On this name, see 4,1,35 Azur note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,21,2\tab CLEE [ST MARGARET]. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Patton Hundred in 1086, later in Munslow Hundred and then in Wenlock Liberty. The Domesday vill was reduced in size by grants of \'bd
 virgate to Shrewsbury Abbey (the Shrewsbury Cartulary: Rees, pp. 16, 343-44) and of 1 virgate to Haughmond Abbey (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, vi. pp. 113-14 no. xiv). The core of the manor followed the expected descent: in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 71a, a quarter of a hide}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
is held in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Cl'ies S'ce Marg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 by William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Maudut }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 with suit at Castle Holdgate. It is held by Robert }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bu
rnel }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from the Earl of Cornwall in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 224, and by John }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Haudlo }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. no. 667; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 75. It had probably once formed a single land-unit with Cleestanton: 3c,13): }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 88.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab A MILL WHICH SERVES THE COURT. See 4,20,8 mill note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,21,3\tab MILLICHOPE. This was in Munslow Ancient Parish. It lay in Patton Hundred in 1086, later in Munslow Hundred and then in Wenlock Liberty. It was granted by E
arl Roger to the church of St Milburga in exchange for Eardington (Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 109; and 4,1,32 Quatford note), and is held by Wenlock Abbey in 1255 in two parts, \'bd
 hide being at }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Mill'ghop Inf'ior}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , \'bd hide at }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Alta Mill\'eegehop }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ('Lower' Millichope and 'High' Millichope) in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 85b; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 228; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 146, iii. nos. 194, 587, viii. no. 667, x. no. 633; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 1; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 327. The estate at Millichope included land at Hungerford (SO5389).
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab }{\i\insrsid4139880 MELICOPE}{\insrsid4139880  was written by the }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 main scribe of Great Domesday over an erasure. In the Alecto facsimile the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 C}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 resembles a large lower-case}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  e}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see 3c,7 Perkley note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab GAMAL. See 4,8,9 Gamal note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THE VALUE WAS. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Vabb}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ' (the abbreviation line passing through both }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 b}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 's) in error for }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valb'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,21,4\tab OXENBOLD. The holding comprised Great Oxenbold (SO5991) and Little Oxenbold (SO5891). Great Oxenbold appe
ars to have been an Ancient Parish and Little Oxenbold (from the time of its gift) a chapelry of Much Wenlock Ancient Parish}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid14225564 .}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  They are now in the Civil Parishes}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid14225564 
 of Monkhopton and Stanton Long}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  respectively. Oxenbold lay in Patton Hundred in 1255, later in Munslow Hundred and then in Wenlock Liberty. Like other holdings in 4,21 it descended to Robert }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
de Girros }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 who gave }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Oxebolde }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 as a fee of Castle Holdgate to the prior of Wenlock: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 71b. This helped produce or restore for the prior a continuous tract of territory south of Much Wenlock (SHR 3c St Milburga note). See }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 85a, 110ab; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 164a; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 20; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii. p. 215; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 357. According to }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 373, the estate included Weston, Hopton, Monk Hall, and Skimlescott (SO5892) but it is possible that at least the first three of these were part of the original grant to the church of Wenlock: 3c,2 Wenlock note.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab LAND FOR 4 PLOUGHS. The main scribe of Great Domesday corrected }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  to }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iiii}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 by the addition of an initial minim in darker ink.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a quarter of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab VALUE WAS 11s. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ix}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  over an erasure.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,21,5\tab HOLDGATE. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Patton Hundred in 1086, later in Munslow Hundred. The Domesday name is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Stantune }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
which is also represented by Stanton Long (4,8,6), the two perhaps once forming the single estate of 10 hides restored to Wenlock church in 901 (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Early Charters of the West Midlands}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, no. 430 p. 148 = Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , no. 221): SHR 3c St Milburga note. This holding was later known as Stanton Helgot from the 1086 overlord, then simply 'Holdgate'. It became }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 caput }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of the barony of Helgot's successors. A castle here is mentioned in Domesday and a college of secular priests established within it before 1210: Knowles and Hadcock, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Medieval Religious Houses}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 415, 427. On the castle, see King, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Castellarium Anglicanum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 425.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 71b, William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Maudut }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Castrum Holegod}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 5 hides, from the king; Thomas }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Maudut }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 had held it in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 144. The }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 100b, 101b, record it as held by the king }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Alemannia}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 then held by the Templars from him, while Robert }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Burnel}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bishop of Bath, holds from the Earl of Cornwall in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 224; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 965, 973, 1283; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 228, 245; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, ii. no. 203, iii. no. 194, v. no. 611, viii. no. 667; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 51; Purton, 'Holdgate and the Cressetts'; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, x. p. 137.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The Templars seem to have acquired also a part of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Longestanton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Stanton Long: 4,8,6) which was adjacent and which escheated to Edward }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Burnel}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 : }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. no. 611.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Herbert son of Helgot gave the church and tithes of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stantona }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 to Shrewsbury Abbey: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. 33, 38).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 SMALLHOLDER [***]. There is no dot after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 bord' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in the manuscript, so the main scribe of Great Domesday may have intended to ad
d details of any ploughs he held and also of any resources when and if available (\{Introduction: Content and Layout\}
). Although dots are sometimes omitted in error, the half-line gap after it is rather too large for the space usually left before the value statement. It is just possible that there is a very neat erasure in this space.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,21,6\tab HOLDGATE. See 4,21,5 Holdgate note.
\par \tab \tab In the Alecto facsimile }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 STANTVNE}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  resembles }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 STANTONE}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see 3c,7 Perkley note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab GENUST, ALWARD [* SON OF ALMUND *], DUNNING AND AELFEVA. The main scribe of Great Domesday unusually wrote an }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 7}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 only between the first two and last two names, so that one might almost think he meant the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  holders to be Genust, Alward Dunning and Aelfeva. Normally there is either an }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 7}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  between all names, as in 6,20;32, or just between the last two, as in 4,21,8;10. See von Feilitzen, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 259, on the possible personal names represented by Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Genust }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 here and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Genut }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
in 4,21,14; these are the only occurrences of the name in Domesday.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab On the identification of Alward, see 3f,2 Alward note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [HELD IT]. The main scribe of Great Domesday omitted }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 tenuer}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 unt}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ] in error.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab LAND FOR 6 PLOUGHS. The main scribe of Great Domesday corrected }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 v }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 to }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 vi}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : the original dot after }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 v }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 can still be seen under the added }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 i}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,21,7\tab PREEN. This was in the Ancient Parish of Church Preen. It lay in Condover Hundred in 1086 and later. The Domesday vill descended to the lords of Castle Holdgate but had been divided before 1255. Of the 3 hides, 2 
hides were in 'Great' or 'Church' Preen and were given to Wenlock Priory possibly by the Domesday subtenant Richard. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 62b, the monks of Wenlock hold 2 hides in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pruna' Magna'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , a fee of William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Maudut}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 230.

\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The remaining 1 hide was at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Parva Pruna}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , also known as Holt Preen.}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 62b, Henry }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Girros }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds two-thirds and the monks of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Prune }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (a cell of Wenlock; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 164b) one third of this hide. The Girros portion went to Richard, King of Almain, then to the Templars of Lydley, then (as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Holtprene) }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 to Edward }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Burnel}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 63a, 91b; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. no. 611. 'Parva' Preen is now plain Holt (SO5396).}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab On the whole manor, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 220; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 38, viii. p. 125, x. p. 32.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab RICHARD [* OF BEAUMAIS *]. Perhaps the Richard here and in 4}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid14225564 ,21,12 was Richard of Beaumais,}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  later Bishop of London (1108-1127), who was Robert of Bell\'ea
me's clerk and possibly his steward: Mason, 'Officers and Clerks',}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 pp. 253-54. He originated from Beaumais-sur-Dive in the French d\'e9
partement of Calvados, arrondissement Caen, canton Morteaux-Couliboeuf. See Loyd, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Some Anglo-Norman Families}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 13; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 362.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab LAND FOR 3 PLOUGHS. In the manuscript there is a space after the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
as if the number of ploughs had originally been omitted and then added in a space that in the event was too large for it. Compare 4,16,1 ploughs note, 4,23,14 land note and 4,23,16 land note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab GODEBOLD [* THE PRIEST *]. Godebold was apparently Godebold the priest (on whom see 3g,3 Godebold note): Mason, 'Officers and Clerks',}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 p. 253.}{
\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WOODLAND, 100 PIGS. This detail may be part of the main holding of Preen that Richard holds from Helgot, rather than of Godebold's subtenancy. Compare 6,11 woodland note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,21,8\tab HARLEY. This was an Ancient Parish. The vill lay in Condover}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid14225564  Hundred in 1086 and later. The}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Helgot interest here was lost and the ma
nor passed to the honour of Montgomery (4,1,15 Montgomery note). In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 62b, Richard }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Harleg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
holds 3 hides in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Harleg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from the former fee of William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Canteloy }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (honour of Montgomery); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 966; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 215, 229, 239; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. no. 17; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 230; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 87.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab A MILL [***]. In the manuscript there is a space suitable for about five letters after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 molin}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ';}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
it is possible that there was a very neat erasure here, or perhaps an imperfection in the parchment, but the space may just have been left by the main scribe of Great Domesday for the mill's value or payment to be added when known.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining quarter of a line after the woodland detail, perhaps for the later insertion of another resource; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,21,9\tab BELSWARDYNE. This was a detached part of Leighton Ancient Parish. It lay in Condover Hundred in 1086 and later. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 965, 973, Robert }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Clifton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds half a fee in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bedlesworthe }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of the barony of Thomas }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Maudut }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
of Castle Holdgate. The same holding is described as \'bd hide of the fee of Robert }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Girros }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Beclesworthin }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 62b. It was subsequently held by the King of Almain and the Templars; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 91b; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 227.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a third of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,21,10\tab FELTON [BUTLER]. This was}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in Great Ness Ancient Parish. It lay in Baschurch Hundred in1086, late
r in Pimhill Hundred. The affix 'Butler' distinguishes it from West Felton (4,3,41). It is held by the Butlers under the barons of Castle Holdgate. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 75a, Hamo }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Le Bottler }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 3 virgates of the fee of William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Maudut }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Felton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
with service at Montgomery. It is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Felton Butler }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pimhill Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  (p. 121) and held by the King of Almain in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 105a; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 965, 973; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 236; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 194; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 201.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ALWARD [* SON OF ALMUND *]. See 3f,2 Alward note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab "ALCHEN". The Domesday form }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Alchen}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , which only occurs}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 here, might represent Old Danish }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Alfkil}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  (von Feilitzen, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 143 and \'a7
 60), but in view of the uncertainty the Domesday form has been retained. The Alecto edition has Alchen.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab AS 3 MANORS. In the text this phrase is misplaced after the statement that these men were free; it is obviously an immediate addition as the ink colour does not change, though the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 p'}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  is slightly darker, probably because the main scribe of Great Domesday re-dipped his pen in ink. See 4,27,18 manors note and 4,7,5 hide note for examples of other cases where 'as }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 n}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  manors' has been misplaced.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,21,11\tab "BOSLE".}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Eyton (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 2) followed by }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 338, and by }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday Gazetteer }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 identified this as Broseley, an Ancient Parish. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Bosle }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 lay in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086 and Broseley in Munslow Hundred in the 
Middle Ages. Places that were in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086 are usually found in Stottesdon or Brimstree Hundreds later. There is no known tenurial connection between Helgot's holding at }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bosle}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 and Broseley which was held by Wenlock Priory. Moreover, spellings for Broseley such as }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Burewardesleg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (1255: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 84b) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Borewardesleye }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lay Subsidy Roll (1334)}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 254) make the derivation from Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Bosle }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 unlikely, although }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 266, has suggested that }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bosle}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  represents
 a shortened pronounciation of the longer name. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 63, iii. p. 278, does not regard the names as related. Thus }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bosle }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is probably an unidentified place and Broseley was probably part of Much Wenlock (3c,2 Wenlock note) in 1086.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The main scribe of Great Domesday failed to rubricate}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  BOSLE}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; for other such failures, see 4,3,8 St Peter note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab GETHNE. See von Feilitzen, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 260, on the possible personal names represented by Domesday }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Gethne}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . The name does not recur in Domesday Book.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank half a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,21,12\tab MEADOWLEY. This place was in Morville Ancient Parish. It lay in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086 and was later in Stottesdon Hundred. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, pp. 965, 973, Hugh }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Opton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 1 fee in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Medowele }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of the barony of Thomas }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Maudut }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of Castle Holdgate, while in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 82b, Thomas }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Upton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 6 virgates from Roger }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Beaumes }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (perhaps a descendant of the 1086 undertenant Richard) with suit at Castle Holdgate; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 108a; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 219; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 194, iv. no. 59; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 148.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HE WAS FREE. This is another misplacement by the main scribe of Great Domesday, though an immediate addition judging by the ink colour, despite its running over into the central marg
in (many of the lines in the bottom third of this column overrun).}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab RICHARD [* OF BEAUMAIS *]. See 4,21,7 Richard note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,21,13\tab IN WROCKWARDINE HUNDRED. This hundred head was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday in the wrong place; on the identity of
 Charlcotte, see 4,21,13 Charlcotte note. He had left a space at the end of the first line of 4,21,14 (see 4,21,14 Genust note) and then accidentally added this head four lines too early in a similar-size space before the value of 4,21,12. For other added
 hundred heads, see 4,18,3 Merset note and 4,20,15 Baschurch note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [* IN "ALNODESTREU" HUNDRED *]. On this insertion to replace the erroneous Wrockwardine hundred head, see 4,21,13 Wrockwardine note and 4,21,13 Charlcotte note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab CHARLCOTTE. This was in the
 Ancient Parish of Neenton. It must have lain in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086 and was later in Stottesdon Hundred. A member of the 1086 manor was The Bold (SO6484) which largely displaced Charlcotte in later documents. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 82b, in Stottesdon Hundred, Robert }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Bolde }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds \'bd hide in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bolde }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
from William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Mauduyt}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 108a, the King of Almain has removed }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bolda }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from suit in Stottesdon Hundred and put it to Castle Holdgate; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 965, 973; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iv. pp. 218, 231; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 194. For Charlcotte, see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 108a; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 629. On the whole manor, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 151.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,21,14\tab [* IN WROCKWARDINE HUNDRED *]. For this insertion, see 4,21,13 Wrockwardine note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab UFFINGTON. This was an Ancient Parish, though part lay in the Ancient Parish of Shrewsbury St Mary. It lay in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086 and was later in 'Bradford' Hundred. Helgot himself gave 1 hide of the manor at }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Mora }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Monkmoor SJ5113) to Shrewsbury Abbey: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. 33, 38). The rest (later assessed at 5 hides) went to the lords of Castle Holdgate, and a tenant, Robert }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de La More}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 late in the twelfth century gave it to Haughmond Abbey: in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 57b the Abbot of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Haweman }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Uffinton'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , 5 hides, by gift of Robert }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de la Mar' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from the barony of William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Maudut }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of Castle Holdgate. The }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 112, records that the land had been taken into Castle Holdgate Liberty by the Templars, but was then held from Robert }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Burnel }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 by the Abbot of Haughmond; see }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 260a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
iii. pp. 192-93; the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, nos. 30-32, 290, 292, 294, 299, 429, 432, 887, 905, 908, 1228-38, 1247); Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 4.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab GENUST AND AELFEVA [***] HELD IT. In the manuscript the remaining third of a line after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Elueua }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is blank, almost certainly left for the hundred
 head to be inserted later (4,21,13 Wrockwardine note), as in other entries; see 4,1,22 Earl note. However, there is an erasure extending from }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 7}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Elueua }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 to after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 tenuer' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 on the next line and these words are very blurred, so it is just possible that the scri
be originally wrote either Alward or Dunning (or both) who held Holdgate with Genust and Aelfeva (probably the same lady) from Helgot in 4,21,6. For the name Genust, see 4,21,6 Genust note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,21,15\tab [GREAT] SUTTON. This was in Diddlebury Ancient Parish. It 
lay in "Culvestan" Hundred in 1086, later in Munslow Hundred. For Little Sutton, see 4,14,24. The overlordship passed from the lords of Castle Holdgate to the Lacys. In the middle of the thirteenth century the King of Almain acquired all the estates that 
belonged to the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Mauduit }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 family (4,21 Helgot note) and alienated them to the Knights Templar. On the dissolution of the Templars, this estate returned to the Lacys. In }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 964, Thomas }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Maudut' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 1 fee in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Sotton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wichecot' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Witchcot SO5381) of the barony of Walter }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Lasey}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 In }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 107a (of 1274), the King of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Alemannia }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 has alienated both holdings to the Templars, while in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 225 (of 1284-1285), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Sotton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is held by Robert }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Burnel }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
from Theobald }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Verdun }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ( 4,8 Roger note) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wichcot }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is held from the same Theobald by Robert }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Broun}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 80b; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 245; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 194, vi. nos. 54, 531, vii. no. 710. The place is called }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Sutton Major }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 507. See Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 64.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HERBERT [* THE LATINIST *]. He is possibly Herbert }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 grammaticus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : 4,3,57 Herbert note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,21,16\tab STEVENTON. This was in Ludford Ancient Parish, which had once b
een a chapelry of Bromfield Ancient Parish. Until 1895 Ludford itself was partly in Shropshire, partly in Herefordshire. Steventon lay in "Culvestan" Hundred in 1086, later in Munslow Hundred. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 70a, Nicholas son of Andrew and William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Aldenham }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hold 1 hide in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Stivinton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
of the barony of Castle Holdgate. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 100b, records suit withdrawn from Munslow Hundred by the Templars and put to Castle Holdgate, while in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 224, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Stevendon }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
is held in two parts from the heirs of John Fitz Alan who hold from the Bishop of Bath (Robert Burnell) under the Earl of Cornwall; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 68.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank half a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,21,17\tab [GREATER] POSTON. This is also known as Upper Poston. It was a township of Hopton Cangeford Ancient Parish. Hopton Cangeford itself had once been 
a chapelry of Stanton Lacy Ancient Parish. Greater Poston lay in"Culvestan" Hundred in 1086, later in Munslow Hundred. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 70a, Philip }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
de Thonglond }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds \'bd hide in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Possethorne Superior }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from Roger }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Girros}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 229; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 61; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 239. For Lower or Lesser Poston, see 3e,1.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,21,18\tab BOULDON. This formerly lay in Holdgate Ancient Parish, then in the Civil Parish of Diddlebury. The Ecclesiastical Parish o
f Diddlebury with Bouldon was created in 1926. In 1086 Bouldon was in "Culvestan" Hundred, later in Munslow Hundred. Robert }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Bolledon' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 2 hides in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bolledon' 
}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Maudut }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 7la. Suit was withdrawn for a time from Mu
nslow Hundred by the Templars and put to Castle Holdgate (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 100b), but Hugh }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Bulledon }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds from Robert }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Burnel }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 224, and Robert holds from the Earl of Cornwall; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 965, 973; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 245; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 194; Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 59; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 148.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,21,19\tab ALCASTON. On the Domesday name-form }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Aelmundestune}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 15. This lay in the Ancient Parish of Acton Scott. It was in Leintwardine Hundred in 1086, later in Munslow Hundred. Alcaston followed the normal descent of Helgot's manors for a time, being held as }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Allaunston }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 100b, by the Templars who withdrew it from Munslow Hundred. It is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Alhameston'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,
}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 1 hide, held by }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Phinian deRoghale }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Rossall) in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 70b, from Thomas his father, but it ultimately went to the Fitz Alan Earls of Arundel; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 224; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 91, iv. no. 90; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xii. p. 1; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 15.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a third of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,22\tab 
HUGH SON OF THORGISL. These Shropshire manors are his only holding recorded in Domesday. His manors escheated to the Crown, perhaps at the time of Earl Robert's forfeiture of the earldom. They were joined to the honour 
of Montgomery that was bestowed by Henry I on Baldwin de Boilers/ Bollers/ Boullers; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 114; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 269-70; and 4,1,15 Montgomery note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab }{\insrsid4139880 The Domesday forms of his father's name - }{\i\insrsid4139880 Turgis}{\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\insrsid4139880 us}{\insrsid4139880 ), }{\i\insrsid4139880 Turgisus}{\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\insrsid4139880 
Turgisle}{\insrsid4139880  - represent Old Norse }{\i\insrsid4139880 Thorgils}{\insrsid4139880 , Old Danish }{\i\insrsid4139880 Thorgisl}{\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\insrsid4139880 
, p. 393. Thorgils appears in the Phillimore printed translations, but JRM regularly preferred the Old Danish name-forms to the Old Norse ones, and as the Domesday form }{\i\insrsid4139880 Turgisle}{\insrsid4139880 
 occurs several times, including here in 17,2, it has been decided to change to Thorgisl. The Alecto edition has Thorgisl.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab The hundredal order of this sub-chapter is as follows (the bracketed numbers are explained in SHR 4 arrangement note):
\par \tab \tab 4,22,1 Leintwardine Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,22,2 Condover Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,22,3 "Culvestan" Hundred
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab If the Hugh of 4,22,2-3 was not Hugh son of Thorgils (4,22,2 Hugh note) it would explain the non-standard hundredal order.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,22,1\tab IN LEINTWARDINE HUNDRED. In the Alecto facsimile the second letter of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 LENTEVRD}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  resembles an }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 I}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
; see 3c,7 Perkley note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab CHELMICK. On the Domesday name-form }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Elmundewic}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 75. This was in the Ancient Parish of Hope Bowdler (4,22,3). It lay in Leintwardine Hundred in 1086 and was later in Munslow Hundred. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 70b, Baldwin of Montgomery holds 2 hides in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Cheilmundewik' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from Odo de}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Hodenet. The estate descended with the manor of Hope Bowdler (4,22,3); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. no. 685; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 349; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 47.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a quarter of a line after the population, perhaps for the later insertion of a resource; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,22,2\tab HUGH. The use by the main scribe of Great Domesday of the formula 'Hugh holds from the earl' instead of his usual 'The same Hugh' (see SHR 4 Roger note) might suggest that he was unsure wheth
er this was Hugh son of Thorgils; if he was not, then 'the same Hugh' of 4,22,3 would not be either. However, descent from Hugh is accepted by }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 and Eyton (4,22,2 Wilderley note and 4,22,3 Hope note).}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WILDERLEY. This was in the Ancient Parish
 of Church Pulverbatch. It lay in Condover Hundred in 1086 and later. The overlordship went to the honour of Montgomery, the tenant from the thirteenth century being the Abbot of Haughmond. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 62a, the Abbot of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hagmu' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 2 hides in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wildridleg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of the fee of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Hope Bothelers }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (4,22,3); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 230, 240; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 163b; the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, nos. 247, 685, 894, 1185, 1314-30); Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 258; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 134; and 4,22,3 Hope note. With Cothercott (4,27,8) and other manors it became part of Haughmond's estate of 'Boveria': 4,5,2 Ratlinghope note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,22,3\tab HUGH. See 4,22,2 Hugh note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HOPE [BOWDLER]. On the Domesday name-form }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Fordritishope}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , see}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 157.}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 It was an Ancient Parish and lay in "Culvestan" Hundred in 1086, later in Munslow Hundred. 'Bowdler' is from Baldwin }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Boilers }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
to whom the honour of Montgomery was granted by Henry I (4,1,15 Montgomery note). In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 966, the Abbot of Haughmond and Stephen }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Hop' }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hold in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hop' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wilderdeleg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of the fee of William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Cantilupo}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . The place is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hup' Budlers }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 70b, held by Odo }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
de Hodenet }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from the heir(s) of William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Cantelou}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 222, 246; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 17, iii. no. 194, v. no. 611; the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, no. 1323). The Abbot of Buildwas held \'bd virgate here in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 71a (see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 163a) and his 1 hide at }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Raggedon' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(Ragdon SO4591) in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 70b, may have been part of Hope Bowdler originally; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 163a. On the whole manor, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 114; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 46.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab EDRIC THE WILD. See 4,1,14 Edric note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab BEFORE 1066. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 T.R.R.E. }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in error for }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,23\tab GERARD [* OF TOURNAI-SUR-DIVE *]. He only held land in Shropshire. He is identified by the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, p. 33; see also pp. 6, 38), a confirmation of the gift of Betton (4,23,9) by Gerard }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Tornai}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . Tournai-sur-Dive is in the French d\'e9partement of Orne (arrondissement Argentan, canton Trun). Gerard probably died soon after 1086 and his lands, though held for a
 time by Hamo Peverel who married Gerard's daughter Sybil, were regarded as having escheated to the Crown. The fief was gradually broken up by successive grants to individuals who hold in chief from various kings, often by serjeanty. See Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 222; Loyd, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Some Anglo-Norman Families}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 104; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Domesday People}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 204-205.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab The hundredal order of this sub-chapter is as follows (the bracketed numbers are explained in SHR 4 arrangement note):
\par \tab \tab 4,23,1-5 Wrockwardine Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,23,6-12 Hodnet Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,23,13 Patton Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,23,14-15 Baschurch Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,23,16-18 "Alnodestreu" Hundred.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,23,1\tab KYNNERSLEY. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. The tithes o
f the manor were given to Shrewsbury Abbey by Hamo Peverel, then the manor itself was given (with Crudgington and Sleap: 4,6,5. 4,14,26) and became part of the abbey's manor of Sleap; see the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. xix, 24, 28, 41, 47-48, 259); E
yton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 126; and 4,6,5 Crudgington note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab VILGRIP <OF WYTHEFORD>. See 4,3,4 Vigrip note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank more than half a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,23,2\tab UPPINGTON. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086 and was later in 'Bradford' Hundred. It escheated to the Crown probably because it had been exchanged (1139 - }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . 1144
) by Walkelin Maminot with the Abbot of Shrewsbury's Crudgington, an exchange that was disallowed by Henry II when he refused to accept William Peverel's designated heirs: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. 26, 27). Uppington was thereafter held directly
 from the Crown as a serjeanty. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 56b, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Uppiton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is 2 hides held for the son of Walter }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Buri }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Uppiton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 who is under-age. Part was held by the prior of Wombridge; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 383; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 221; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 261; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii. pp. 194-95; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. nos. 156, 445; Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 151.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WHICH PAY TAX. Scribe B inserted }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geld'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  into a space left by the main scribe of Gr
eat Domesday for it (1,5 hide note). For other additions by scribe B on the taxability of a holding, see 4,1,1 pay note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining third of a line after the hedged enclosure, perhaps for the later insertion of another resource; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,23,3\tab SHAWBURY. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Sachebur' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 was an escheat of Gerard }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Thurnay }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 147 (see the Red Book of the Exchequer: Hall, ii. p. 509), and was granted to Thomas }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Erdyngton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 by King John. Egidius }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Herdinton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 2 hides in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Chabur' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in 
}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 56a; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 222, 227, 237;}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Calendar of Inquisitions Post
 Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 442, iii. no. 635. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Schayebur' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is held with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Welinton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(Wellington; see 4,1,22 Wellington note) in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 964, and the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 115, records its members as half of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Parva Whetheford }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Little Wytheford; 4,8,8 Wytheford note) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Besford }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Besford: 4,23,14); see 
}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 236; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 133.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ALGEAT <OF SHAWBURY>. }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The Domesday forms of this name-form - }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Eliet}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Aelget}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{
\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Aliet, Elget }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 - could represent either the hypothetical Old English }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \'c6thelgeat }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 or Old English }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \'c6lfgeat}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  or, where the sex is unknown (in WOR 26,9, WAR 16,41 and SHR 4,23,3), the Old English feminine names }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \'c6thelgyth}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \'c6lfgyth}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 or}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Ealdgyth}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 146, under }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Al-geat}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , a
nd also p. 142, under }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Al-}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
. The Phillimore printed edition has the form Algeat, though some of the above Domesday forms appear as Alfgeat; these have now been standardized as Algeat. The Alecto edition followed von Feilitzen with Algeat.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab }{\insrsid4139880 
The name Algeat occurs on four widely separated holdings in Domesday Book, all of modest value, none close to any other, and each devolving upon a different tenant-in-chief. All four were probably held by different individuals in 1066 (JP).}{
\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WHICH PAY TAX. Scribe B inserted }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geld'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 over an erasure. For his other additions on the taxability of a holding, see 4,1,1 pay note. On the spaces left by the main scribe of Great Domesday for them and what might have been erased here, see 1,5 hide note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,23,4\tab CHERRINGT
ON. This was a township of Edgmond Ancient Parish and was in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. In the thirteenth century the land here seems to have been held directly from the king. It is presumably the unnamed land that is an es
cheat of Gerard }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Thurnay }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 held by Thomas }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Cherinton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 147. Richard (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Cherinton'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ) holds 4 hides in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Cherinton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 57b, the additional hide perhaps representing the land named }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Cerlitone }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in Great Domesday 4,4,25 (see 4,4,25 Cherrington note). Half a}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hide had been granted by Ralph }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Erleton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
to Shrewsbury Abbey in the mid-twelfth century (the Shrewsbury Cartulary: Rees, pp. 43, 46) but the grant had not been sustained; parts were held by Wombridge Priory in 1255 (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 57b); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 220, 237; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. pp. 389-90; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 261a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 113; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, viii. p. 195.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,23,5\tab 'CHATSALL'. This 'lost' manor was at the meeting point of the township of Moreton Say (in Hodnet Ancient Parish) and Stoke-on-Tern Ancient Parish: 1,9 'Chatshall' note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab "LEDUUI". It is not certain what name is represented by the Domesday form }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Leduui}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , which only occurs here in Domesday; see von Feilitzen, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 309. The Phillimore printed edition has Ledwy, the Alecto edition Ledwi. It has been thought safest to retain the Domesday form for the present edition.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WHICH PAY TAX. Scribe B inserted }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geld'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 over an erasure; it is blurred. For other similar insertions of his, see 4,1,1 pay note. For the spaces regularly left for them by the main scribe of Great Domesday and for what might have been erased here, see 1,5 hide note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a quarter of a line after the population, perhaps for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,23,6\tab SANDFORD. This was a township of Prees Ancient Parish. It
 lay in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. After escheating to the Crown it became a tenure in chief held by a family named from the place. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 147, Ralph }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Saneford' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Saneford'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 an escheat of Gerard }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Thurnay}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 while in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 57a, Odo }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Hodenet}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 guardian of Ralph }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Santford}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 3 hides in an unnamed place, presumably Sandford, with service at Shrawardine (4,3,50); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 221, 227, 237; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v. no. 5; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 221. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Sondford }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
is held with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rowthall' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Ruthall: 4,23,13) in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 116; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vii. no. 70.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,23,7\tab 
ELLERDINE. This was a township of the Ancient Parish of Ercall Magna (also known as High Ercall). It lay in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. When it escheated it was combined with Sutton Maddock (4,23,16), Rowton (4,27,26) and Brockton
 (4,23,16) to form a serjeanty, the service being that of English-Welsh interpreter. It was given by Henry II to Iorwerth Goch and descended to the Madoc who named Sutton (4,23,16 Sutton note). In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 147, Gruffydd }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Sutton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ruelton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (4,27,26),}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Ellewurthin'}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Sutton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (4,23,16) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Brocton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(part of Sutton: 4,23,16) by gift of King Henry, 'father of King John'. The 3 hides allowed to }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rowelton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 57a (see 4,27,26 Rowton note), probably included the 1 hide of Ellerdine; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 220; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 239. The tithes of Rowton and Ellerdine were held by Wenlock Priory.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,23,8\tab [COLD] HATTON. This place was in Ercall Magna (also known as High Ercall) Ancient Parish. It lay in Hodne
t Hundred in 1086 and was later in 'Bradford' Hundred. After the land escheated to the Crown, an early holder, Baldwin }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wischard}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
gave a member, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Podeleford }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Potford SJ6321), to Shrewsbury Abbey: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, p. 269 no. 283). Baldwin }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wischart }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hatton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 147, an escheat of Gerard }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Thurnay}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
; William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wischart }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds it}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 966. William }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Coldehatton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds \'bd hide in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Coldehatton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 55a. William de Wischart gave the land}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 to Lilleshall Abbey soon after; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 237; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 118; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 261a; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ix. p. 218.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THESE 2 MANORS. That is Ellerdine and Cold Hatton (4,23,7-8). The odd fractions of a hide (1 hide, 1 \u8531\'3f virgates, plus 2 \u8532\'3f
 virgates) also link the two manors to form a two-hide unit. Such fractions are fairly unusual in Great Domesday and it is likely that these two manors with a joint assessment were really a single one. Although the Latin does n
ot make it clear whether the details of lordship ploughs, population and value refer to both lands, it is likely that they did. Compare 4,20,5 and 4,20,5 manors note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab LAND FOR 3 PLOUGHS. Scribe B interlined }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 car'}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  which had been omitted by the }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 main scribe o
f Great Domesday in error; he showed its correct position in the line below with an insertion mark after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . He made an identical insertion in DEV 28,8.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,23,9\tab BETTON. The Domesday name-form is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Baitune}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , on which see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 46. This place lay in Norton-in-Hales Ancient Parish. It lay in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. Gerard de }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Tornai }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
gave a portion to Shrewsbury Abbey (an early gift, confirmed by Earl Roger; see the Shrewsbury Cartulary: Rees, pp. xix, 6, 33, 38, etc.). Another part, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Dunstal }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(Tunstall SJ6935), was given by Hamo Peverel }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
1136-1139: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, p. 22, etc.). The result of these gifts is that in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 58a, the Abbot of Shrewsbury is said to hold }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Betton'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , 6 hides, from Gerard }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 le Torney}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 It is }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Betton subtus Lyme }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 227. The members are given in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 117, as }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Norton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Norton-in-Hales: 4,21,1), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Tunstall' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Tunstall), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Rigwardyne }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Ridgwardine SJ6838), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lees }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (The Lees SJ6638) and half of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Parva Drayton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(Little Drayton: 4,19,8). See }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 260a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii. pp. 189, 190; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 197; and 1,6 Betton note. Betton and Norton between them would account for 6 hides.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ULFKETEL. }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The Domesday forms of this name - }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Vlchil}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Vlchel}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Vlchetel}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Vlchet}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 e}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ), }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ulketel}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Vlketel}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 l)us}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ulfchetel}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ulfketel}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Olketel}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ofchetel}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  etc. - represent Old Norse }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ulfkell}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , Old Danish }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ulfkil}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
: von Feilitzen, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, pp. 399-400. As the Phillimore printed translations include Ulfkell, Ulfketel, Wulfketel and Ulfketill, it has been decided for the present edition to use the Old Danish form for them all, although the presence of }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 -chetel}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  and }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 -ketel}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  in a number of Domesday forms may suggest that the name Ulfketil or Ulfketel was also current then. The Alecto edition has Ulfkil here.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,23,10\tab LONGSLOW. The Domesday form is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Walanceslau}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Longslow was formerly in Hodnet Ancient Parish an
d is now in the Civil Parish of Moreton Say. Moreton Say itself was once a chapelry of Hodnet Ancient Parish. Longslow was in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 147 (see p. 965), it is represented by the unnamed land held by Hugh }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Wlonkeslawe }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 as an escheat of Gerard }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Thurnay}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
. It is then held by serjeanty with service either at Shrawardine Castle or Shrewsbury Castle or ultimately at Montgomery. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 55a, Hugh }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
de Wlonkislow }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 3 hides in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wlonkislow }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 with service at Shrawardine Castle or Shrewsbury Castle; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 221, 227,237; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 758, v. no. 447, ix. no. 381; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 214. A more modern form of the name, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Longislow}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is found in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 116.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,23,11\tab IGHTFIELD. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred, and after escheating to the Crown became a tenure by serjeanty. Roger }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
de Ichefeud }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds \'bd fee in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ichefeud }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 965, as a fee }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
de Turnay}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 while in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 57b, Griffin }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 deWarran' }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 2 hides in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ihttefeud }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 by exchange with Roger }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Ihttefeud. }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
By this time the Abbot of Combermere was holding \'bd}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 virgate here by gift of the same Roger; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 220, 227, 237; }
{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 118; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 245a; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 208.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,23,12\tab WOLLERTON. This was a township of Hodnet Ancient Parish. It lay in Hodnet 
Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. The tithes were possibly granted to Shrewsbury Abbey at an early date, perhaps by Hamo Peverel (the Shrewsbury Cartulary: Rees, p. 11), then soon after the whole vill was given: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees,
 p. 33; see pp. xix, 38, etc.). In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 58a, the Abbot of Shrewsbury holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wulvton}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 1 hide, in free alms, the gift of Hamo }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pev'el}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 see }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 117; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 260a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. pp. 189-90; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 205.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ESKIL. }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The Domesday forms of this name - }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Aschil}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Anschil}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Anschill}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ), }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Osketel}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Osketellus}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Oschetel}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Aschillus}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Aschi}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Osketel}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ], }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Oschil}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  - represent Old Danish }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Eskil}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , Old Norse }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Askell}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{
\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 167-68. The printed Phillimore edition has the forms Askell and Asketill; these have now been standardized as Eskil. The Alecto edition has Eskil here.}{
\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining third of a line after the woodland detail, perhaps for the later insertion of other resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,23,13\tab RUTHALL. This place was in the Ancient Parish of Ditton Priors. It lay in Patton Hundred in 1086, la
ter in Munslow Hundred. After escheating to the Crown it became a serjeanty and was held by a family named from Sandford (4,23,6) and under them by families called de Ruthall and de Sandford (the latter named from Sandford (4,23,6), also held by Gerard in
 1086). In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 7la, John }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Rodhal' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds \'bd hide in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rodhall'}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 116, Ralph }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Sondford }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Sondford }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rowthall' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in Munslow Hundred, while in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 223, John }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
de Rohale }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rohale }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from Ralph }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Sonfford}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 229; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, i. no. 170, v. no. 5, vii. no. 70, x. nos. 353, 544; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 47; and 4,3,7 Abdon note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab GERHELM. This is the only occurrence in Domesday Book of this name.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ESKIL. See 4,23,12 Eskil note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,23,14\tab BESFORD. It was in the Ancient Parish of Moreton Corbet. It lay in Baschurch Hundred in 1086, later in Pimhill Hundred. After escheating to the Crown, it was given to the Erdington family. In }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 75a, Egidius }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Erdinton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 2 \'bd hides and a quarter (hide) from the king in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Besford}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . It was then, as later, regarded as a member of Shawbury (4,23,3); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 216; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Pimhill Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 120; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 p. 115; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 308, iii. no. 635, v. no. 104; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, x. p. 173. By 1255 the remaining 1 virgate was in the hands of the Abbot of Haughmond: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 75a; the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, nos. 148, 731-2, 1105, apppendix A. i.).}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ESKIL. See 4,23,12 Eskil note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab LAND FOR 3 PLOUGHS. In the manuscript there is a small space after the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(not shown by Farley); it might be that the number of ploughs was not originally known and a space left which turned out to be too big. See 4,16,1 ploughs note, 4,21,7 land note and 4,23,16 land note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 2 WIDOWS. They were possibly the widows of Eskil and Doda.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,23,15\tab PRESTON [BROCKHURST]. This was a township of the Ancient Parish of Moreton Corbet
. It lay in Baschurch Hundred in 1086, later in Pimhill Hundred. After escheating to the Crown, it was given to the Erdington family (like Shawbury and Besford: 4,23,3;14) and was held as \u8531\'3f hide in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Preston Toret }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of the fee of Egidius }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Erdinton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 75a. For another part of Preston, see 4,19,10. On the manor as a whole, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 178.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ROBERT FROM HIM. The main scribe of Great Domesday interlined }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 7 Rob}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 er}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ]}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 t}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ] }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de eo}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , the descender of the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 7}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  reaching down after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 PRESTONE}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  to act as an insertion mark. It was probably an early addition as the pen and ink are the same as in the text below.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab "BERTUNT". The Domesday form }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bertunt }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 probably represents Old English }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Beorhthun}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 though it could derive from Old German }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Berthund}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 194. In view of the uncertainty it has been decided to retain the Domesday form for the present edition. The Alecto edition has Beorhthun. This is the only occurrence of this name in Domesday.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,23,16\tab SUTTON [MADDOCK]. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086 and was later in Brimstree Hundred. Land at }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Suthtun}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 was left to Burton Abbey }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . 1003 in the will of Wulfric Spot: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Early Charters of the West Midlands}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 149 no. 144 (= Sawyer, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , no. 1536 =}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Charters of Burton Abbey}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , no.}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
29). This was possibly at this Sutton in Shropshire, but, if so, there is no other trace of any connection with Burton Abbey:}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Charters of Burton Abbey}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. xxxi. A grant of four }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 cassata }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 at}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Suthtone }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 with permission to acquire one more was made in 949 by King Eadred to Ulfketel }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 miles}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , no. 549 (=}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Charters of Burton Abbey}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. xxxi and no 8). This may have been the same Sutton.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab After the la
nd escheated to the Crown, it was granted to Iorwerth Goch under Henry II for interpreter service between England and Wales. He was son of Maredudd ap Bleddyn ap Cynfyn, ruler of Powys. The land went to his son Madoc, then to Madoc's brother Gruffydd who 
married Matilda Lestrange, then to their son Madoc who named the place. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Griffin }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Gruffydd) }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Sutton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Sutton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 147, along with Rowton, Ellerdine and Brockton (4,23,7 Ellerdine note). }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Sotton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is held with }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Brocton }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (part of Brockton SO7203; see 4,17,2 Brockton note) in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 234, and is }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Sutton Madok }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 157; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. no. 516, ix no. 223; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 103.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab LAND FOR 12 PLOUGHS. This phrase seems to have been added: apart from the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 T }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 T'ra }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
the ink used is darker. There is a small gap between }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 xii }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 car'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
similar to other gaps left in the plough estimate (4,16,1 ploughs note, 4,21,7 land note and 4,23,14 land note).}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab A CERTAIN MAN-AT-ARMS. In the manuscript a few letters have been erased between }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 qd' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 miles}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
; Farley did not print the gap thus caused (though he did in 4,1,6;15 etc).}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THE ORDNANCE SURVEY FACSIMILE fails to reproduce the dot at the end of this entry. Compare 3f,7 plough note. It is visible in the Alecto facsimile.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,23,17\tab HATTON. This was in Shifnal Ancient Parish. It lay in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086, then in Brimstree. For the descent of this portion, see 4,3,62 Hatton note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WHO PAYS 2s. Latin }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 redd'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  could abbreviate either }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 reddentes}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 (plural), referring to the smallholders and the settler, or }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 reddens}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 (singular), referring just to the settler. The punctuation does not help in determining which is meant, but in 4,25,3 and 4,27,27 se
ttlers make a money payment. This seems to have been for the right to settle on land, for in HEF 10,43 men pay 10s 8d for their right to settle (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 pro suis hospitiis}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in Hopleys Green. Colonists were invited by a lord to cultivate his land, which was often o
n the border and newly acquired from the Welsh and waste; they may also have been engaged in clearing and then ploughing woodland. See HEF 10,44;47, in which money renders are also mentioned, and CHS 2,9. See Nelson, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Normans in South Wales}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 57-60. However, smallholders sometimes paid rents (see 1,8 smallholders note) and the Phillimore printed edition translated }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 redd'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 here as the plural.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a third of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,23,18\tab STOCKTON. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086 and was later in Brimstree Hundred. Stockton became a tenure in chief by serjeanty; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 1183, 1244, 1285; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 226; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 142.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,24\tab NIGEL [* THE DOCTOR *]. Nigel is i}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 dentified by }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 303, as Nigel the 
doctor (see SHR 9), with the suggestion that he was the man of that title who held in Kent, Hampshire, Wiltshire, Somerset, Gloucestershire, Herefordshire and Worcestershire. A plain Nigel also holds from Earl Roger in Hampshire and Sussex. These tenants 
of Earl Roger in three counties might be the same man. Earl Roger certainly had a doctor called Nigel (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, vi. p. 750), but it is uncertain if the present Nigel is this man and that every Nigel holding from Earl Roger is the same individu
al. Keats-Rohan's connection between the Shropshire Nigel (the doctor) and the Nigel the doctor who held from the king in Wiltshire (also called Nigel the priest in the Tax Return for Calne Hundred, Exon folios 1a, 7b, 13a) and who was the ancestor of the
 Calne family seems gratuitous. See }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 290, and Mason, \lquote Officers and Clerks\rquote ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 p. 252.}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The vills of this small fief escheated to the Crown and were given to Alan de Dunstanville by Henry I.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,24,1\tab ADDERLEY. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. After escheating it was granted by Henry I to Alan }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Dunstanvil' }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and was combined into a single estate with Nigel's other manors. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 56a, Walter }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Dustonvill' }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Addirdel' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from the king in chief, while in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 118, John }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lamare }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Adurley }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 through Petronella his wife with members }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Schenton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(Shavington: 4,24,2), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Chalverhall' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Calverhall: 4,24,4) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Sponeley }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Spoonley: 4,24,3); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids
}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 222, 227; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vii. no. 104; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, x. p. 1. The Dunstanvilles held Shifnal (4,9,1) with which these manors were sometimes associated.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,24,2\tab SHAVINGTON. This place lay in Adderley Ancient Parish. It was in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. It descended with Adderley; see 4,24,1 Adderley note; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 7.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HE FOUND IT WASTE. Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 wasta}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 nominative, is in error either for }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
wastam }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (feminine)}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 or for }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 wastum }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (neuter), both}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 accusative to agree with either an understood }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 terram }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (or perhaps }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 dimidam hidam }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 understood from }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 dimidia hida }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in the first line of the entry)}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 or with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 manerium}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, similarly understood.}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The phrase used in 4,3,22 is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 wast\'fb inuenit}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . The scribe may have been going to write }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 fuit }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 or }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 est }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in place of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 inuen}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 it}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ],}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 as in the next entry. The same mistake occurs in 4,25,2 and 4,26,6.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,24,3\tab 
SPOONLEY. This was a township of Adderley Ancient Parish and was in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. Like Adderley, with which it descended, it was given to the Dunstanvilles; see 4,24,1 Adderley note; Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 9.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,24,4\tab 
CALVERHALL. This place was formerly a township of the Ancient Parish of Prees, and is now a separate Ecclesiastical Parish, but for civil purposes is in Ightfield (Civil) Parish. It was in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred
. Like the other entries in this sub-chapter, it is later regarded as a part of Adderley (4,24,1); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. no. 185; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 10.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab IN LORDSHIP 1. That is, 1 plough, the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 una }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 agreeing with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 caruca}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
; the syntax is interrupted by scribe B's insertion (4,24,4 land note).}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THIS LAND PAYS TAX. Scribe B added this in a space left by the main scribe of Great Domesday after, rather than before, the plough estimate. On these spaces, see 1,5 hide note.
 For other additions by scribe B on the taxability of a holding, see 4,1,1 pay note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,25\tab NORMAN [* THE HUNTER *]. He is called Norman }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Venator }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
('the hunter') in the grant of Booley (4,25,2 Lee note) to Shrewsbury Abbey: the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, p. 3
3). He was apparently the brother of Roger the hunter (SHR 4,26); both of them were Earl Roger's huntsmen and had been granted land near the known Shropshire forests (Mason, 'Officers and Clerks',}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 p. 250). He was a benefactor of Lewes Priory. He may be the Norman }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 venator}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  who gave land at Mac\'e9 (in the French d\'e9partement of Orne, arrondissement Alen\'e7
on, canton S\'e9es) to Saint-Martin-de-S\'e9es (Round, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Documents,}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 France}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 233 no. 656; Bates, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , no. 271 pp. 813-17). He was ancestor of the de Pitchford family who later held all the manors of his Shropshire fief that can be identified. See Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 150; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 298; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 306.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab The hundredal order of this sub-chapter is as follows (the bracketed numbers are explained in SHR 4 arrangement note):
\par \tab \tab 4,25,1 Condover Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,25,2 [Hodnet] Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,25,3-5 Baschurch Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,25,6-7 "Alnodestreu" Hundred.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,25,1\tab CANTLOP. It lay in Berrington Ancient Pa
rish. It was in Condover Hundred in 1086 and later. It passed to the Pitchfords and by early in the fourteenth century was held under them by the Chetwynds who were the Pitchford's tenants at Pitchford (4,19,12). In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 62b, 1 hide, a fee of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pick'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , is held in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Cantolop }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 by Hugh }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Wlonkesloy }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and John }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Arundel}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 230; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. nos. 569, 758, iii. no. 194, v. no. 611, viii. no. 667; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, vi. p. 286; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 19.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining half a line after the mill detail, perhaps for the later insertion of the woodland or other resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,25,2\tab [IN HODNET HUNDRED]. The later history of Lee Brockhurst makes it clear that a heading has been omitted; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, vi. p. 1, ix. p. 361; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 340 note 103.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab LEE [BROCKHURST]. This was a chapelry of Wem Ancient Parish, then an
 Ancient Parish in its own right. It must have lain in Hodnet Hundred in 1086 and was later in 'Bradford' Hundred. Norman gave part of the vill to Shrewsbury Abbey. This lay at }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bolileia }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(Booley SJ5725): the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. xix, 33, 38, etc.); }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 117. The rest of the vill, \'bd}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
hide, descended to the Pitchfords: in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 57a, Bertram }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Burgo }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lega}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 a fee of John }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Picheford}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 It is }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Leye subtus Brochurst }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 221; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 227; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 119; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 569; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 361.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WIHTRIC <OF LEE>. On the name Wihtric, see 4,3,27 Wihtric note.
\par \tab \tab Note to be supplied on this identification (JP).}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ALFHEAH HELD. The }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 main scribe of Great Domesday wrote }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Elfac tenuer'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  over an erasure.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HE FOUND IT WASTE. See 4,24,2 waste note for the scribal error.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,25,3\tab COLEMERE. This was a township of Ellesmere Ancien
t Parish. It lay in Baschurch Hundred in 1086, later in Pimhill Hundred. It was held under the Pitchfords in the thirteenth century by Bertram and then by Bartholomew }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Burgo}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . In }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 75b, Robert }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Lacy }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 2 hides in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Colem'e }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 as a
 fee of Bertram }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Burch'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 227; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pimhill Hundred Roll}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 120; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 194; and 4,1,19 Ellesmere note.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 COLESMERE}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  was written by the main scribe of Great Domesday over an erasure; there is an erased memo above it in the top margin. On these marginal notes, see C6 accident note.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ALDGYTH <OF WELSHAMPTON>. See 4,3,49 Aldgyth note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank half a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,25,4\tab "ESTONE". This place has not been satisfactorily identified. If it lay in Baschurch Hundred, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Estone }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
might be the Aston whose name is preserved in Aston Cottage, Weston Common in Baschurch: Foxall, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Gazetteer of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 11. If a "Merset" Hundred head is missing (as in 4,6,6) }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Estone }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 might be Aston in Oswestry and is so identified by }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday Gazetteer}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
. But early forms for Aston Cottage are lacking and no descent to the Pitchford family has been found to support these identifications.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 2 \'bd HIDES WHICH PAY TAX. The main scribe of Great Domesday momentarily omitted }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 7}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 dimidia }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
and had to add it at the end of the phrase.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab IT IS AT A REVENUE FOR 36s. That is, it was being 'farmed' at a rate of 36s a year; see 3d,5 revenue note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,25,5\tab "CHENELTONE".}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Cheneltone }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 remains wholly unknown; the name may have disappeared if the vill remained uncultivated: Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 198; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 340 note 105.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 
The inclusion of this holding here is odd, lacking both 1086 and 1066 tenants. It was presumably next to Nigel's holding of "Estone" in the circuit volume, the probable immediate source of Shropshire and other counties in circuit V. On a possible arrangem
ent there of Earl Roger's lands, see SHR 4 Roger note. Compare 4,26,2 Broom note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,25,6\tab IN "ALNODESTREU" HUNDRED. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 IN E}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  over an erasure: he may have begun }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 tenuer'}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  before he realized that there was a hundred head. There is an erased memo in the outer margin next to it, on which see C6 accident note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ALBRIGHTON. This was an Ancient Parish near Shifnal. It lay in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086, later in Brimstree Hundred. It descended to the Pitchford family and in the co
urse of time became associated with other manors held by them. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 1284, Ralph }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Picheford' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds the manor of }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Albricton'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 while in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 964, the same man holds 1 fee in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Aubricton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ruton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (part of Ryton; see 4,17,3). In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 225, John }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Pucheford }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Albricton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hunfreyston }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(Humphreston SJ8105), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wystan }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Whiston SJ7902) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bispeston }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Bishton 4,25,7); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 234, 244; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 286, ii. no. 569; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 149.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ALGAR. The association with another holder, Godgyth, suggests that this is not the great Earl Algar of Mercia (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 pace}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 the Phillimore printed edition) but a minor holder of that name of which there are several occurrences in Shropshire.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab GODGYTH <OF ALBRIGHTON>. }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The Domesday forms of this feminine name - }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Godid}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Goded}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{
\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Godet}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Godhit}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  (here a scribal error for }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Godith}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ) - represent Old English }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Godgyth}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 264. This 
was apparently JRM's preferred form, but in the Phillimore printed translations the form Godith was also used. The Alecto edition has Godgyth. This is the only occurrence of this name in Domesday Shropshire.
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Godgyth is an uncommon name, occurring on 18 h
oldings, probably representing four or five individuals. The modest Shropshire holding is likely to have been the only possession of this Godgyth since his nearest namesakes were over 60 miles away, their holdings were miniscule or wasted (JP).}{
\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WOODLAND ... IN THE KING'S HANDS. The wood of this manor has probably been drawn into the forest of Brewood which is unmentioned in Domesday: Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 185; \{Introduction: Forest\}. This is the only piece of Shropshire that Domesday records as being held by the king himself in 1086; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 295; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 149. Brewood was a forest of considerable extent; it no doubt 
also included the woodland mentioned under the manor of Brewood itself (STS 2,1). Two small convents, one in Shropshire and one in Staffordshire, were established in this forest in the twelfth century: Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 185; \{Introduction: Ecclesiastical Organization\}.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,25,7\tab BISHTON. The Domesday form is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bispetone }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ('Bishop's }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 tun}{\cf1\up6\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ')}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ;}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 the bishop is unknown, but the manor had probably been a possession of the see of Litchfield: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 49. Bishton was in Boningal
e Ancient parish which was itself previously a chapelry of Stockton Ancient Parish. Bishton lay in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086, later in Brimstree Hundred. It passed to the Pitchfords and became part of their Albrighton manor; see Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 166; and 4,25,6 Albrighton note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,26\tab ROGER THE HUNTER. He was apparently the brother of Norman [the hunter] who held from Earl Roger in the previous sub-chapter in Shropshire (SHR 4,25); compare the brothers Roger and Robert, the sons of
 Corbet, who shared adjacent chapters in this county (SHR 4,4. SHR 4,5). Roger the hunter was also a subtenant of Earl Roger in WOR 14,1. His successors are the barons of Pulverbatch, Shropshire. The lands passed to Roger (II) the hunter, then to Reginald
 de Pulverbatch in the reign of Henry II. Reginald\rquote s daughter Emma married Herbert }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Castello }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(that is of Castle Holdgate; see SHR 4,21 Helgot note). The barony passed to John de Kilpeck, then to his son Hugh and on his death was divided between his daughters Isabel (who married William Walerand) and Joan (who married Philip Marmion). See }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 298; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 191; Sanders, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 English Baronies}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 73-74; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 411.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab His lands form a sub-chapter of their own and are not part of 4,27, as suggested by Lewis, 'Introduction', }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Shropshire Domesday}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 12; see SHR 4 arrangement note.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab The hundredal order of this sub-chapter is as follows (the bracketed numbers are explained in SHR 4 arrangement note):
\par \tab \tab 4,26,1-2 Baschurch Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,26,3-4 Condover Hundred}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 4,26,5 Patton Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,26,6 [Hodnet] Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,26,7 Wrockwardine Hundred
\par \tab This last is an added entry.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,26,1\tab ROGER THE HUNTER HOLDS. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 tten' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in error for }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ten'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 'SLACKBURY'. This place, which survived at least until 1255, lay in Baschurch Hundred in 1086, later in Pimhill Hundred. It appears in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 75b, as }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Sclachbur'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 1 hide, in Pimhill Hundred held by William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Hochton'}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 a fee of Thomas }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Costentin }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 who presumably held under the barons of Pulverbatch; see }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 341 note 107; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 198. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire
}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. xii, leaves }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Slacheberie}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  unidentified.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,26,2\tab IN THIS HUNDRED. That is, in Baschurch Hundred; the heading is above 4,26,1.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab BROOM ... THE EARL'S MEN ARE IN DISPUTE ABOUT IT. Broom is near Tetchill. It lay in Ellesmere Ancient Parish, but since 1894 has been in the Civil Parish of Ellesmere Rural. It was in Bas
church Hundred in 1086. The litigation seems to have been rather more complicated than Domesday states: ostensibly the holder of this sub-chapter, Roger the hunter, is in dispute with Albert about the removal of land from Albert's village of Welshampton (
4,3,54). However, Norman [the hunter:}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,25 Norman note] must have been a claimant, since Broom descends to the Pitchfords of whom Richard de Pitchford gave }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Brome }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
to Haughmond Abbey: the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, nos. 196-201, 487, 681, 1175). Though sandwiched between two estates held by Roger the hunter, this 1 hide has no named 1086 holder, and it seems likely that it is in this sub-chapter only because it is i
n the same hundred ('in this hundred') as 4,26,1. Working from a document like the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Inquisitio Comitatus Cantabrigiensis}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, arranged by hundreds and vills, some scribe, probably one compiling the feudally-arranged circuit volume, was unable to allocate this la
nd to a fief, so left it where he found it. A similar thing happens in Surrey (SUR 19,40 this entry note). Compare 4,25,5 "Cheneltone" note.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Roger the hunter, Norman the hunter, Albert and Reginald under whom he holds are all 'the earl's men', and this a
ppears to be a dispute among two of them; they are not suing some other party as implied by the translation in the Phillimore printed edition ('the Earl's men are suing for it'). The Alecto edition has 'The earl's men are litigating about this'. This disp
ute is likely to have been settled in Earl Roger's own court, so the clause has a particular significance: this is not a dispute that the Domesday Commissioners or the county court should or needs to resolve. Fleming, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Domesday Book and the Law}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 226 no. 1331 has 'The earl's men are litigating over it'. See Lewis, 'Introduction', }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Shropshire Domesday}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 11.
\par \tab \tab The confirmation by Engelard }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Stretton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 calls this place }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Brome iuxta Elesmere}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 200.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ALBERT [* GRELLEY *]'S VILLAGE, WELSHAMPTON. That is, 4,3,54, held in 1086 by Albert [* Grelley *] from Reginald the sheriff. On the doubtful identification of this Albert with Albert Grelley, see 4,3,5 Albert note.}{
\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ALDGYTH <OF WELSHAMPTON>. See 4,3,49 Aldgyth note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,26,3\tab WRENTNALL. It lay in Church Pulverbatch Ancient Parish. It was in Condover Hundred in 1086 and later. St Chad's Church never regained the 1 \'bd
 hides it claimed and the vill subsequently merged with Pulverbatch (4,26,4); see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 205; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 134; and SHR 3f St Chad's note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ERNWY <OF PONTESBURY>. Wrentnall is adjacent to other properties suggested as being held by this man (JP).
\par \tab \tab See 4,4,12 Ernwy note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab LAND FOR 5 PLOUGHS. [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining third of a line after this statement. There is no }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 r}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  (for }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 require}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 :}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
'enquire') in the margin drawing attention to something that needs to be added, and it is not clear what he wanted to add here. Because of its size it is unlikely to have been left for the later inclusion of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geld' }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 or}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  non geld'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
as probably in 4,17,2 where he had failed to leave a space after the 2 hides (see 4,17,2 land note) and as definitely in 4,24,4 (4,24,4 land note). Compare 4,20,18 land note, 7,6 ploughs note and 3f,2 church note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THE COUNTY TESTIFIES ... THEY DO NOT KNOW. That is, the county court. In the second half of the sentence the main scribe of Great Domesday confuses the court (singular) with the men in it and uses a plural verb }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ignorant}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab On the claim, see also Fleming, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday Book and the Law}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 226 no. 1332. She is wrong, however to equate St Chad's with the Bishopric of Chester, which are given separate chapters in Domesday Shropshire.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab BEFORE KING EDWARD ['S TIME]. That is, before 1042.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HOW THEY LEFT [THE CHURCH]. The Phillimore printed translation has 'in what way they went astray'. Latin }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 exier}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 unt}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ] is from the verb }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 exeo}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  ('to go out', 'leave', 'go away'). Land can be said to 'move' in sentences such as 'he could go where he would with 
his land' (3b,4 go note). Here a portion of land has been taken from St Chad's Church and joined with half a hide not in their ownership to form one manor where there were previously two.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining third of a line after the hedged enclosure, perhaps for the later insertion of another resource; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,26,4\tab PULVERBATCH. This was the Ancient Parish of Church Pulverbatch. The Domesday vill, which lay in Condover Hundred 
in 1086 and later, included both Church Pulverbatch (SJ4302) and Castle Pulverbatch (SJ4202), the latter now known as plain Pulverbatch. It had become }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 caput }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
of the barony of Pulverbatch by the end of the twelfth century and a castle is evidenced there in 1205; see King, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Castellarium Anglicanum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 423. John de Kilpeck held from about 1193, then William de Cantilupe, then Philip Marmion. William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Cantilupo }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Castrum Pulrebeche }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 144. Part of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Polrebeche }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is said to be land of Hugh }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 d
e Kilpec }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 966, 973, while Philip }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Marmiun }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Castell Poleredech }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from the king in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 215; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 229, 240; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. nos. 29, 279, viii. nos. 374, 557, x. no. 559; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 188; }
{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 133; and 4,3,15 Roger note. The 5 hides held by Philip }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Marmion }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Walraund }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pulrebech }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 62a,
 must have included part of Wrentnall (4,26,3) as well as the unnamed 2 hides that were the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 caput }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of Longnor (4,3,15 Roger note).}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HUNNING <OF LAWLEY>. See 4,3,56 Hunning note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank two-thirds of a line after
 the riders (who were entered after the woodland detail, not with the rest of the population); perhaps he thought more resources might be discovered; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,26,5\tab BECKBURY. This was an Ancient Parish. If the hundred head i
n Domesday is correct this will have been a detached part of Patton Hundred in 1086; this fact, together with the dedication of the Church to St Milburga, suggests an ancient connection with Wenlock Priory (SHR 3c St Milburga note) which is not mentioned 
in Domesday. It has been suggested that it is the unidentified }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Kenbecleag}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  of the grant of lands to Milburga by her brothers between 690 and 704 (Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , no. 1799 = }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Early Charters of the West Midlands}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 147 no. 428). On purely formal grounds this is unlikely; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 104.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Unlike Roger's other estates, Beckbury did not pass to the barony of Pulverbatch, but to Fitz Alan. In 1242-1243 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 962) }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Beckebur' }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 is held by John }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Beckebur }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 of the barony of John Fitz Alan, but in 1255 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 85a) it was held by Philip }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Bekebury }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 under the prior of Wenlock; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 971; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 225, 244; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 164b; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 133; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 285 note 24; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 241. It was in Brimstree Hundred, then in Wenlock Liberty, and was sometimes coupled with Badger (4,17,1), as in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 228.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab An early severance from Beckbury seems to have been }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hadinton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Harrington SJ7402) where }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 1284, records that }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Griffin }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Gruffydd) }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Sutton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (i.e. Sutton Maddock) holds 1 virgate of land, alienated from Hugh }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Bekebir'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 225.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab AZUR. On this name, see 4,1,35 Azur note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab MAN-AT-ARMS PAYS 20d. He probably held Beckbury for a money rent, as no 1086}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid14225564  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 value is given for the manor; see 3d,5 revenue note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,26,6\tab [IN HODNET HUNDRED]. The identity and later history of Moston makes it certain that a hundred head has been omitted.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab MOSTON. This was a township in the Ancient Parish of Stanton-upon-Hine-Heath. It must have lain in Hodnet Hundred in 1086 and was later in 'Bradford' Hundred. It descended to the barons of Pulverbatch: in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 58b, Odo }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Hodenet }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 2 hides in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Moston' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
from the fee of Pulverbatch, while in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 119, William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hodnet }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Moston }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from Philip }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Marmyon }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 who holds it from the king as a member of his barony of Kilpeck; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 221; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 532, iii. no. 635; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 356.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HE FOUND IT WASTE. See 4,24,2 waste note for the scribal error.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,26,7\tab THE MAIN SCRIBE OF GREAT DOMESDAY realized his omission of this entry at an early stage because of its insertion after 4,27,4}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid14225564  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
and not below the bottom marginal ruling (which comes about one line below the last line of 4,27,6). Farley printed as daggers on their side the transposition signs indicating the correct place in the text of this entry.
\par \tab \tab In the Penguin Alecto edition the lack of transposition signs mean that this entry wrongly appears to be part of sub-chapter 4,27.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HAUGHTON. Haughton Demesne was an extra-parochial place which was placed in Uffington Civil Parish in 1885, having briefly been a Civil Parish itself from 1858. It lay in Wrockwardine Hundred}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid14225564 
 }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. This portion of the vill went to the barony of Pulverbatch; another part was held under Fitz Alan (as part of Upton Magna: 4,3,24). The Pulverbatch 
portion went to Haughmond Abbey early in the thirteenth century. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 56a ('Bradford' Hundred), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Halihton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
contains 1 \'bd hides of which the Abbot of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Haymo }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds half (presumably 1 hide, the larger 'half') from the honour of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pulrebach' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
and Thomas }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bot'hel }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds the other half from John Fitz Alan; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 260a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 220; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 113; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iii. no. 635; the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, nos. 32, 168, 172, 292, 396, 422-23, 462-91, 647-48, 653, 820); Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 285. It is }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Halton subtus Haghmon }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 260a, and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 192.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 MAN WHO PAYS 6s IN REVENUE. It would seem that he 'farmed' Haughton; see}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid14225564  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 3d,5 revenue note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27\tab [HOLDINGS OF VARIOUS TENANTS UNDER EARL ROGER].}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
This sub-chapter appears to correspond to the two that commonly terminate a Domesday county: 'Land of the King's Servants (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 or}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Sergeants)', which often contained the lan
ds of minor Frenchmen or those holding by serjeanty, and 'Lands of the English Thanes'. There are few names identifiable as French in this chapter. The great majority are Englishmen, some of whom had held the land in 1066. Others of them may have come int
o the land by inheritance.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Lewis ('Introduction', }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Shropshire Domesday}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
', p. 12) reckons that the layout of this sub-chapter, with spaces left between the lands of the Frenchmen on folio 259b but not between those of the English on folio 259c
, 'signalled their division into two groups'. However, of the spaces he noted between the French tenants on folio 259b two are illusory, being caused by the heads for Wrockwardine and "Merset" Hundreds (above 4,27,2;4) being placed on a separate line abov
e
 their respective holdings, rather than after the value of the preceding entry, the space before 4,27,1 is the normal one before a new sub-chapter (see SHR 4 Roger note) and no space was left before 4,27,5 as the scribe reverted to his normal practice, co
n
tinued on folio 259c, of not putting the hundred heads on a separate line. Lewis further thinks that the scribe indicated that Godebold (4,27,7), whose land was listed first on folio 259c, was a Frenchmen despite the 'layout' suggesting he was English, by
 deliberately not aligning his entry with the rest of the column. A study of the manuscript does not show any misalignment: the scribe began the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 G}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Godbold'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 exactly in line with the entry strokes of the initial letters of the succeeding tenants (the left-hand strokes of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 A}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 s in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Avenel}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  and}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 Alward }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in 4,27,8-9 naturally protrude), while the second line of 4,27,7 is likewise in line with the second and subsequent lines of the entries below. Moreover, the scribe could have shown that Godebold was French (if h
e was: his name is Old German) merely by putting the Condover hundred head above the next entry on a separate line, if that was really how he indicated the holdings of Frenchmen.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab These miscellaneous lands do not all descend in the same way; many became s
erjeanties, several go to the honour of Montgomery, and the lands of individuals - for example, of Fulcwy (4,27,2-3) and Alward (4,27,23-25, if this is one individual) - tend to have the same later history (in these cases passing to Fitz Alan and to the h
onour of Montgomery respectively).}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THE HUNDREDAL ORDER }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of this sub-chapter is as follows (the bracketed numbers are explained in SHR 4 arrangement note):
\par \tab \tab 4,27,1 [Hodnet] Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,27,2-3 Wrockwardine Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,27,4 "Merset" Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,27,5-6 Condover Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,27,7 Wittery Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,27,8-15 Condover Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,27,16-20 "Reweset" Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,27,21-25 Wittery Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,27,26 Hodnet Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,27,27-28 Baschurch Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,27,29-30 Wrockwardine Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,27,31 "Merset" Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,27,32-33 Leintwardine Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,27,34 "Merset" Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,27,35 'Conditre' Hundred.
\par \tab The rationale for this sequence is unclear. The scribe may have tried first to separate Frenchmen from Englishmen, but he most probably tried to include all the lands of an indivi
dual together. In nearly every case, these lay in the same hundred but at 4,27,20-21 he followed the lands of Almund's son from "Reweset" Hundred to Wittery Hundred, and then stayed in that hundred to enter people who had not previously been included in t
his chapter. If the scribe was drawing his material from a larger composite chapter in the circuit volume or if the latter had been unable to draw all the material from a document (like the }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Inquisitio Comitatus Cantabrigiensis}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ) which was arranged by hundreds and vills, by going through only once, it is inevitable that the same hundred would appear more than once in several cases.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27,1\tab [IN HODNET HUNDRED]. The restoration of this head depends on the identity of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ludecote}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see 4,27,1 Cotton note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab RALPH THE COOK. Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 329, calls him 'tenant, and presumably cook, to Helgot of Castle Holdgate'. However, Ralph holds not from Helgot but from Earl Roger.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab COTTON. Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ludecote. }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Because of the absence of a hundred head and the fact that the Domesday form seems to have simplified to }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Cote }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 there must remain some uncertainty about this identification which is, however, accepted by }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 101. If it is Cotton (on Tern) it lay in Stoke-on-Tern Ancient Par
ish and was in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, then in 'Bradford' Hundred. It appears that Toki's portion (1 hide, though said to be 2 hides in Henry II's confirmation) was given by him to Shrewsbury Abbey as }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Cota}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. xix, 33, 39, 41, 256). Another part of the vill of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Cotin'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , \'bd hide, is in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 55a, said to be divided between John }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Cotin }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and Walter }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bras}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 both holding from the barony of Pulverbatch (4,26 Roger note). In the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 116, Robert }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Wynkeshull' }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds from William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Hodnete }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 who holds from Philip }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Marmyon}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 221;Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 358.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The grid reference (SJ6327) is to Cotton Farm.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27,2\tab FULCWY <OF WITHINGTON>. }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The Domesday name-forms }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Fulcui}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Fulcoius}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{
\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Fulcuius}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Fulcheius}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  probably represent Old German }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Fulcwig}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 257; Forssner, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Continental-Germanic Personal Names in England}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 98. The latter also suggested Old French }{
\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Folcui}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , which might be more appropriate for those who held in 1086. }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The name is different to }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Fulco }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(see 4,3,46 Fulco note).}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  JRM preferred the second element -wy for the Old German -}{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 wig}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . In the Phillimore printed editions the names Fulcwy, Fulkwy and Fulk a
ppear; these have now been standardized as Fulcwy. The Alecto edition has Fulk, Fulcwig, Fulco, Fulcui, Fulchei etc.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The Phillimore printed edition (4,27,2-3 Fulkwy note), refers to the identification by Mason, 'Officers and Clerks', p. 247, of this man 
with Reginald the sheriff's deputy (or under-sheriff), though he seems to equate Fulcoius with Fulco. Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 203, under Fulcuius, rejects this identification; however, she errs in calling Fulcuius the tenant of 'Rainald de Balliol
', confusing him with the Fulco who was Reginald of Bailleul's tenant. Nonetheless there are grounds for thinking that this man was Earl Roger's sheriff or under-sheriff at some stage because of the evidence of the Shrewsbury Cartulary; see 4,3,46 Fulco n
ote.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 
WITHINGTON. This was a chapelry in the Ancient Parish of Upton Magna, then a separate Ancient Parish. It lay in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. After escheating to the Crown, both of Fulcwy's lands (see also 4,27,3) were giv
en to Fitz Alan and held under that barony by the de Haughtons. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 971, Robert }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Halecton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wythinton'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Knitteleg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Knightley in Staffordshire) and in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wytheford }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(Little Wytheford: 4,27,3). The 3 hides of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wythynton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 57a, presumably included the \'bd
 hide of Little Wytheford; see the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 113; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 220, 228; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 473, iv. no. 198; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 75.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 2 \'bd HIDES [***]. In the manuscript there is an erasure of some four letters after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 dimid'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , possibly of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geld' }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 as the bottom part of a }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 g }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in the correct place for}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  geld' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 has not}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 been}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 erased. Compare 4,19,4 hides note, 4,27,3 hide note, 4,27,9 hide note and 4,27,2
9 hides note. On the gaps left after the hidage by the main scribe of Great Domesday, see 1,5 hide note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HE FOUND IT WASTE. This was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday in the outer margin of the manuscript, though probably at an early stage as the ink is the same colour as for the rest of the entry.}{
\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27,3\tab FULCWY <OF WITHINGTON>. See 4,27,2 Fulcwy note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [LITTLE] WYTHEFORD. This place was in Shawbury Ancient Parish. It lay in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. It was given w
ith Fulcwy's other manor (4,27,2 Withington note) to the Fitz Alans and held under them by Fitz Ayer. It is coupled with Withington and land in Staffordshire in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 971, was presumably accounted for by Withington in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 57a, and is the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Littill' Whetheford}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 half of which is held in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 113, by John Fitz Ayer from Richard Fitz Alan. It is}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Parva Wythinton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (a confusion with Withington) in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 220; see the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 115; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 122, iii. no. 115, v. no. 470; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 71. The other half of Little Wytheford (4,8,8) was held by the Erdington family: 4,23,3 Shawbury note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \'bd HIDE [***]. In the manuscript there is an erasure of some five letters after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hida }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 at the beginning of the second line; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geld' 
}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 may have been written as the bottom part of a }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 g }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in the correct place for }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geld' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
has not been erased. Compare 4,19,4 hides note, 4,27,2 hides note, 4,27,9 hide note and 4,27,29 hides note. On the gaps left after the hidage by the main scribe of Great Domesday, see 1,5 hide note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27,4\tab ERNUCION <OF KINNERLEY>. An Ernucion occurs twice in Sussex as Earl Roger\rquote s tenant (SUS 11,56;85) and may be Ernucion }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Balbet}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, who made grants of land to Saint-Martin-de-S\'e9es, one of them with the agreement of his brothers Hugh and Warin; see Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 191, who also has a reference for the only other Ernucion in Domesday (BRK 12,1). Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 181, explains }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ernucion }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 as a possible derivative of Old German }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ernust}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  (on which see Forssner, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Continental-Germanic Personal Names in England}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 83, though he does not mention the Domesday form }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ernucion}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 )}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab KINNERLEY. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in "Merset" Hundred in 1086. It escheated to the}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid14225564  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Crown and was conferred by Henry II on his interpreter Iorwerth Goch (4,23,7 Ellerdine note; 4,23,16 Sutton note). It was involved in a series of disputes but eventually went to the Audleys. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calenda
r of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii no. 476, William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Auditheleye }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 held }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Kynardeley }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of the heirs of Madoc }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Sotton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (on whom, see 4,23,16 Sutton note) in exchange for }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Apedale }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(Apedale) in Staffordshire. It is there said to lie beyond the county; that is, it was under Marcher control. It is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Kenardeleye }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v. no. 62, with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Egardesley }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Edgerley SJ3518) as its member. See Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}
{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 23.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Kinnerley formally returned to the county in 1536 on the dissolution of the Marcher lordships.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 WELSHMAN PAYS 1 HAWK IN REVENUE. Because of the lack of 1086 value for}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid14225564  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
this holding, it is quite likely that the Welshman was holding it for a money rent (see 3d,5 revenue note on 'farming' and compare 4,3,35 pays no
te), as apparently in HEF 25,4. Hawks often figure as part of a manor's revenue; see 4,8,16 and 4,24,4. However, the lack of 1066 value too may mean that the scribe was merely without the value as a whole of this manor and that the payment of the hawk was
 for some other purpose.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 
AFTER THIS ENTRY the main scribe of Great Domesday wrote the details of a holding of Roger the hunter that he had omitted earlier in the column; see 4,26,7 scribe note. He indicated its position with a pair of transposition signs.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27,5\tab THEODULF [* THE MASON *]. Theodulf is possibly to be identified as Theodulf }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 cementarius }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
('builder with cement', 'mason') who had a son called Walter: Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 425.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 'HAWKSLEY'. The Domesday form is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Avochelie}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . It lay in Ruckle
y and Langley, which is now a Civil Parish but which was formerly a township of the Ancient Parish of Acton Burnell.}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
It lay in Condover Hundred in 1086 and later. The site is deserted and the manor lost, but it was said to lie between Langley and Ruckley i
n 1269 and its site lay within Langley park in 1535. It was granted to Shrewsbury Abbey after 1086 and before 1194 and was leased to the Burnells, the lords of Langley (4,27,10): the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. 133, 232-33, 280, 343-44); Fletcher, 'Sh
ropshire Feet of Fines A.D. 1196-1211', p. 309; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 148; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. pp. 141-43.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THIS MANOR IS AT A REVENUE FOR 6d. See 3d,5 revenue note on the practice of 'farming' land.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27,6\tab THEODULF [* THE MASON *]. See 4,27,5 Theodulf note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab PULLEY. It is probably 'Over' or 'Upper' Pulley, formerly in the Ancient Parish of Shrewsbury St Julian, now in the Civil Parish and Ecclesiastical Parish of Bayston Hill; for Lower Pulley see 6,30 Pulle
y note. It lay in Condover Hundred in 1086 and later and became a serjeanty, the service being that of keeping the king's 'hay' in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lithewode }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(now represented by Great Lyth (SJ4507), Great Lyth Farm and Lythbank (SJ4607), Lythwood Hall, Lythwood House and Lythwood Farm (SJ4708) and Lythwood View (SJ4607). In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 7, Hugh }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Extraneus }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and Elias }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Hatincham }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hold 2 virgates in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pulileg'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 the other virgate (making the 3 virgates of Domesday) being held by Dionisia, daughter of Roger }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Muissun}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  
}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 while 1 \'bd virgates are held in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hoverpolile }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 by Ralph }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Marescall' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 63a, from Engelard }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Polileg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and a further virgate is said to be alienated in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 63b. See }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 755, vii. no. 660; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 206.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [* QUEEN *] EDITH. Edith here may have been Edward the Confessor's queen of that name: an Edith also held the other holding in Pulley (6,30) which passed to Ralph of Mortimer and he succeeded to other l
ands held by Queen Edith (see for example HEF 9,7). See Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 206; and 6,2 Edith note. On the name Edith, see C13 Edith note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 3 VIRGATES. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .iii. virg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 appears clearly, as in the Alecto facsimile; for some reason the Ordnance Survey facsimile reproduces the number as }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .iiiy. }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 See 3f,7 plough note on other faulty reproductions in this facsimile.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27,7\tab GODEBOLD [* THE PRIEST *]. See 3g,3 Godebold note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab LACK. It lay in that part of Churchstoke Ancient Parish 
(Brompton and Rhiston) that was in Shropshire. It lay in Wittery Hundred in 1086, but seems to have little later independent history, probably being absorbed by Rhiston and Brompton (4,27,24 Rhiston note).}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27,8\tab COTHERCOTT. This place was in the Ancient P
arish of Church Pulverbatch. It lay in Condover Hundred in1086. It went to the honour of Montgomery, being held by the Cantilupe family, then passing by 1215 to Haughmond Abbey. It combined with Wilderley (4,22,2) to form a manor within the abbot's estate
 of 'Boveria' (4,5,2 Ratlinghope note); see the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, nos. 243-51, 1314); Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 261; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 134. It is presumably the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Crodecot }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 163b, which pays assize due
s to Haughmond Abbey.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HUNNING <OF LAWLEY>. See 4,3,56 Hunning note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27,9\tab ALWARD [* SON OF ALMUND *]. Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 149, under Alward filius Elmundi, has five references to folio 259c, presumably referring to 4,27,9;17;23-25.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab STAPLETON?. Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hundeslit. }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 This portion of the manor seems to have combined with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hundeslit}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 (4,4,2)}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and Netley (4,28,2) to form the later manor of Stapleton held of the honour of Montgomery: 4,4,2 Stapleton note. Stapleton was an Ancient Parish.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 HIDE AND \'bd VIRGATE [***]. In the manuscript there is an erasure of some five letters after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 virg'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
; it is not possible to tell what was erased but it could have been }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geld'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , as probably or certainly in four other instances; see 4,19,4 hides note, 4,27,2 hides no
te, 4,27,3 hide note and 4,27,29 hides note. See 1,5 hide note on the spaces left after hidage by the main scribe of Great Domesday.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab NOW 4[s]. The side marginal ruling comes on the second minim of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iiii}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , probably the reason why the main scribe of Great Domesday omitted }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 sol'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 although he overran into the central margin several times in this column. Compare 4,5,7 now note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27,10\tab THORTH [* OF WROXETER *]. On his name, see 4,3,14 Thorth note and, on his possible identification, see 4,3,26 Thorth note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 
LANGLEY. It lies in Ruckley and Langley which is now a Civil Parish but was formerly a township of the Ancient Parish of Acton Burnell. It lay in Condover Hundred in 1086 and later. It became a tenure by serjeanty, the service being the carrying of a gosh
awk from Shrewsbury castle to Stepney (Middlesex) once a year: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 145. It is later held by the Burnell family. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 62b, \'bd hide is held in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Longeley }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 by William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Bardines }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
de Gardinis }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 575), while William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Burnel }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Longleye }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 229; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 384, 1185, 1241; }
{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 91b; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v. no. 435, vii. no. 312; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 140; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 142; Fletcher, 'Grant by Sir William de Gardinis', p. 178.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27,11\tab SIWARD [* THE FAT *]. See 4,27,32 Siward note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab FRODESLEY. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Condover Hundred in 1086 and later. The overlordship passed to Fitz Alan with a family called Hunald as tenants: in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 62b, Thomas }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Unald }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 1 hide in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Fredesleg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from John Fitz Alan. According to }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 962, 971, William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Honaud }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 had held }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Frodesleg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
from the barony of John Fitz Alan. See }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 230, 239; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 194; Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 291; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 81; Auden, 'Frodesley'.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27,12\tab AUTI }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 <OF LEEBOTWOOD>. See 4,5,3 Auti note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 'LYDLEY [HAYES]'. This place was in Cardington Ancient Parish. It lay in Condover Hundred in 1086 and later (although it is included in Munslow Hundred in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lay Subsidy Roll}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  (1327)}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Munslow Hundred}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 315, and in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lay Subsidy Roll (1334)}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 254). The s
ite is now deserted, but the place survived to be marked on the first edition Ordnance Survey map (sheet 61 of 1833, reprint sheet 41 of 1970) and is represented by Day House: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 188. The estate was adjacent to Leebotwood (4,27,13), both apparently clearings in the same wood and both held by Auti in 1086.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab The land passed to the Fitz Alans and William Fitz Alan (I) endowed a preceptory of the Templars here along with Herbert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Castello }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(of Castle Holdgate). The Templars held a number of other estates close by Cardington including Enchmarsh and half of Chatwall (4,3,44 Cardington note). The grant of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lidleg' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 included }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Gumble }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Comley SO4896) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Boccefelt }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Botvyle SO4796): }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 63a. After the dissolution of the order, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lidleye }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 passed to the successors of Fitz Alan, the Earls of Arundel: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 229. See Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 237; Lees, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Records of the Templars in England}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. cvi-cvii, cxi-cxiii, 37-41 etc.; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii p. 85, x. p. 27.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27,13\tab AUTI }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 <OF LEEBOTWOOD>. See 4,5,3 Auti note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab LEEBOTWOOD. Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Botewde}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . The place lay in Condover Hundred in 1086 and later. Leebotwood, earlier 'Lee in Botwood', was an Ancient Parish and was 
named from one particular clearing or open space in a large area of woodland called 'Botwood' (see 4,3,15 Longnor note). There is no apparent continuity between the Domesday manor of 'Botwood' and the later Leebotwood. The latter was granted between 1163 
and 1170 by Henry II as two }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 landas }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in Botwood to Haughmond Abbey:}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, nos. 144, 267, 425, 679-98). The }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 146, calling it }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Leg' in Bottewud'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , assesses it as \'bd hide, but describes it as assarted land (i.e. recently cle
ared) and as a former member of the manor of Condover (4,1,2). It was held by the abbey until the Dissolution; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 260b; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 62a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 230; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 24; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. pp. 98, 101. A member may have been }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bechecot' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Betchcott SO4398), also an assart of the manor of Condover, held in 
}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 146, by the Abbot of Haughmond in perpetual alms. Land in this wood was also held by the Templars (their manor of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Botelege}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , possibly an ellipsis of a hypothetical }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Botewudelege}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ), but that name and estate are difficult to connect with Leebotwood; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 172; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 91; and 4,27,12 Lydley note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27,14\tab SIWARD [* THE FAT *]. See 4,27,32 Siward note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab OVERS. This place was in Wentnor Ancient Parish. It lay in Condover Hundred in 1086. The entry appears to be a duplicate of 4,1,34 (which was a later addition), though it has slightly more detail; see 4,1,34 Overs note.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27,15\tab SMETHCOTT. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Condover Hundred in 1086 and later. It passed to the honour of Montgomery, following the descent from Millicent, the sister of George Cantilupe, by marriage to Eudo 
}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 la Zouche. }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 62a, \'bd hide in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Smethecot }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
is held by three men from the guardian of the heir of William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Canteloy}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . Hugh }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Burnel }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and Reginald }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
de Escot }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hold from Millicent }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (La Such) }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 215. In the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 970, it was coupled with Hadnall and Halston (4,3,58;32); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 230; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 17, iii. no. 194. The other \'bd hide was at }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Piclescot' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Picklescott SO4399) divided in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 62a, between the Abbot of Haughmond and Madoc }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Piclescot' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and held of the fee of Roger }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Sprenthose}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, nos. 186, 873-77). A}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 successor of Madoc gave his portion to the Cistercian monks }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of Pole }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Ystrad Marchel or Strata Marcella: 4,5,10 Marche note); see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 250; Morgan, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Montgomeryshire Territorial Divisions}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 25; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 151.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ALDRED [* BROTHER OF SIWARD *]. See 4,3,15 Aldred note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THE VALUE WAS 4s; NOW 4s. When the value of 
a manor remained the same between 1066 and 1086 the main scribe of Great Domesday regularly wrote 'The value was and is ... '. There is no sign that either of the values here was corrected which would account for this unusual formula and the 1086 value ca
nnot have been added because the hundred head in the next line avoids it. The scribe probably wrote }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valuit iiii sol' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
before he realized the present value was the same, though he could still then have written }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 modo similiter }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 'now the same'. Alternatively one or other of the figures is an error.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27,16\tab EYTON. It lay in Alberbury Ancient Parish which was later united with Cardeston Ancient Parish. Another part of Eyton (4,4,9) passed to the lordship of Cause; both portions lay in "Reweset" Hundred in 1086, late
r in Ford Hundred. Eyton followed the same descent as Stapleton (4,27,9) passing to the honour of Montgomery, being held by William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Cantilupo}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 then by Eudo }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 la Zouche}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 then by the Mortimers, Earls of March. In the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 966, Roger }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Eston' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and others hold in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Eyton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from the barony of William }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Cantilupo}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 1283; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 89b; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 17; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 216; and 4,27,17 Amaston note. Half a virgate was held by the 
monks of Grandmont (i.e. the monks of Alberbury: Knowles and Hadcock, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Medieval Religious Houses}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 103; see 4,1,9 Alberbury note) in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 67a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 163b. On the whole manor, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , 
vii. p. 120; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 200.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab In the Alecto facsimile }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 ETVNE}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  is not lined through in red; see 3c,7 Perkley note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27,17\tab ALMUND AND HIS SON ALWARD. Scribe B interlined }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 7 ALWARD}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
. In order to form an insertion sign for his addition, he erased the horizontal stroke of an original }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 7}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  written by the main scribe of Great Domesday. Farley printed this insertion mark as an }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 7}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , however, which might seem to make the reading 'Almund and Alward and his son'.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 
Almund's son holds the next four manors (4,27,18-21) and the Almund who was his predecessor in 4,27,21 was almost certainly his father. It appears that the Almund named here was the Almund who was the predecessor of Reginald of Bailleul 
in this county (4,3,45;47-48;63;67) and also in Warwickshire (WAR 12,3-4;7). The Alward who preceded Reginald in four manors (4,3,61;64;68;70) was probably Almund's son: Williams, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 The English and the Norman Conquest}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 90; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 188, who gives just one folio reference, corresponding to the present entry. See also 4,27,9 Alward note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 'AMASTON'. The Domesday form is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Enbaldestune}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . It was a township of Alberbury Ancient Parish which was later united with Cardeston Ancient Parish. It
 was in"Reweset" Hundred in 1086, later in Ford Hundred. Amaston is a shrunken hamlet, represented by Amaston farm on the six-inch Ordnance Survey map (33 SW) of 1891, a name that seems recently to have been succeeded by Heath farm (SJ378112); see }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 18.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Tenurially Amaston had the same history as Rowton (4,27,18), both being held by the son of Almund. They went to the honour of Montgomery, were treated as a single manor and sometimes listed with Eyton (4,27,16). In the }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 1283, William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Cantilupo }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds 3 hides in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Eton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Eyton), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Sunton' }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Rowton) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Amboldeston'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Dunton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Ambaldeston' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 account for 2 hides in Ford Hundred in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 66b, held by John }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 le Poer }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and Nicholas }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Meverel }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 although the 
record is probably in error in saying that the overlordship belongs to the barony of Cause. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 89b, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Ruto' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Ambaldesto' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 are in Chirbury Hundred, held from the honour of Montgomery; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 173; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, viii. p. 200.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HE HELD IT HIMSELF. Almund was the 1066 holder. The interlineation of his son as joint 1086 tenant interrupts the original sense of the first 1 \'bd
 lines. Almund had also held Wotherton (4,27,21) which passed to his son (Alward).}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27,18\tab ALMUND'S SON. That is Alward: 4,27,17 Almund note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ROWTON. This was a township of Alberbury Ancient Parish which was later united with Cardeston Ancient Parish. Like Amaston (4,27,17) it lay in "Reweset" Hundred in 1086, later in Ford Hund
red. It followed the same descent as Amaston, except that 1 virgate was given by Robert }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Budlers }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 to Shrewsbury Abbey: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 66b. See }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 216; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. no. 17, vi. nos. 137, 174; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 177; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 200.
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The Grid Reference (SJ3612) is to Rowton. Rowton Castle is at SJ3712.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab AS 4 MANORS. This phrase is misplaced after the statement that they (the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 holders) were free; it is possible that the main scribe of Great Domesday had a break after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 tenuer' ante e\'fb}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , because }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 7}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 lib'i fuer' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is in slightly darker ink and the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 fuer' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 particularly is larger and not so well written. Compare 4,21,10 manors note.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank almost half a line after the riders, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27,19\tab POLMERE. On the identification of Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pole}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 237. Polmere was a township of Pontesbury parish and was in "Reweset" Hundred in 1086, later in Ford Hundred. Polmere now lies in Lea Cross parish. It also seems to have merged, like Benthall (4,27,20), with Ford manor, becoming a mere member o
f it and having the same overlords, the Audleys; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 196; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vii. p. 179; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 228; and 4,1,16 Ford note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab LEODMER <OF WHITTON>. See 4,4,19 Leodmer note. The Phillimore printed edition has Leofmer here, in error.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \'bd HIDE AS 2 MANORS. See 4,7,5 hide note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27,20\tab BENTHALL. It lay in Alberbury Ancient Parish which was later united with Cardeston Ancient Parish. It was in "Reweset" Hundred in 1086, later in Ford Hu
ndred and became a member of Ford manor. It may originally have belonged to Wenlock Abbey. See Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vii p. 178; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 228, x. p. 250; and 4,1,16 Ford note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WITH 1 PLOUGH. In the manuscript there is a dot after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 car}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ';}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Farley failed to print one.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27,21\tab WOTHERTON. The Domesday form is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Vdeuertune}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
It lay in Chirbury Ancient Parish and was in Wittery Hundred in 1086, later in Chirbury Hundred. This vill became part of the honour of Montgomery. It is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wodforton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 965, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wodeverton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 973, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Woden'tun}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , 1 hide, in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 60b, and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Woderton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 240, either held from the honour of Montgomery or by service at Montgomery castle; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 383 (}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wdeverton'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 );}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 89b; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 361, vi. no. 685; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 233; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 74.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ALMUND [* FATHER OF ALWARD *]. See 4,27,17 Almund note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 24 MEASURES OF CORN. The main scribe of Great Domesday originally wrote }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 xx}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, then immediately added four minims to it, the first covering the original dot after the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 xx}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; he then interlined }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 or}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 (the last two letters of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 quattuor}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : 'four') to clarify the correction; compare 6,1 slaves note.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 uascula}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 frumenti}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ) here is neuter plural of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 uasculum }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
meaning a small vessel and by extension the amount it could hold, a small measure. The exact amount is not known, however. Compare }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 modium frumenti }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in 5,8; see 5,8 measure note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining third of a line after the mill detail, perhaps for the later insertion of the woodland or another resource; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27,22\tab ERTEIN. The Domesday form }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ertein }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 perhaps represents Old German }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Herithegan}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 248; Forssner, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Continental-Germanic Personal Names}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 83. This is the only occurrence of this name in Domesday Book. (This corrects Dodgson and Palmer, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Index of Persons}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , under Ertein. )}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab MIDDLETON. This place was formerly in Chirbury Ancient Parish and is now a separate Ecclesiastical Parish. It lay in Wittery Hundred in 1086, later in Chirbury Hundred. In 10
86 another half consisting also of 3 virgates was held by Robert son of Corbet (4,5,13); by 1255 the two parts were regarded as two-thirds and one-third of Middleton. The present holding, the one-third of the vill, went to the honour of Montgomery: in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 60b, four men and one woman hold }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Middeltun' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 with service at Montgomery Castle. See Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 84; and 4,1,36 Ackley note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HE WAS A FREE MAN. The main scribe of Great Domesday interlined this above }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ipsemet tenuit}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
; no insertion mark was felt necessary. This was probably an early addition because the ink colour and pen are the same as in the text below, and another instance of his misplacement of parts of the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  tenure.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27,23\tab ALWARD [* SON OF ALMUND *]. See 4,27,17 Almund note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 'MUNTON'?. The Domesday form is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Muletune}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
. This place was in Wittery Hundred in 1086, later in Chirbury Hundred. The Domesday form suggests identification with Mellington (4,1,35) which is in the same hundred. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i.
 p. 343, tentatively and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday Gazetteer}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 definitely choose this identification. But that part of Mellington was part of the castlery of Montgomery, waste in both 1066 and 1086, and no other vill given in 4,1,35-36 under Montgomery was divided between di
fferent 1086 holders. It is tempting to assume an error in the Domesday form (possibly influenced by the preceding name }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Mildetune}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
and identify it with a place called }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Munetun }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in 1255 (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 61a). It is said there to be 1 virgate in ext
ent, to lie in Chirbury Hundred (the successor to Wittery) and to be held by Adam }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Brerlawe }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and Adam }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Passavant}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 responding with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Eitun }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Eyton in Alberbury: 4,27,16) to Montgomery castle. Thomas }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hager }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 232, and 1 virgate in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Moneton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is held by George }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
de Cantilupo}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 honour of Montgomery, in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. no. 17. 'Munton' appears regularly in medieval documents (for example, in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lay Subsidy Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  (1327)}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Chirbury Hundred}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 56; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lay Subsidy Roll (1334)}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 257) but is regarded as lost. A part seems to have been held from the Corbets of Cause in Worthen (Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, xi. p. 108) and in a 1272 document cited by him it is associated with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Aston }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Aston Rogers; see 4,6,6), }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bromlawe }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Bromlow SJ3101), }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Whytspon }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Whitsburn SJ3302) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lockelegh }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Luckley SJ3201). It will be noted that \'bd
 mile north-east of Aston Rogers is a place called Mondaytown. Its etymology requires further investigation. See Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 78. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. xii, does not identify }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Muletune}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27,24\tab ALWARD [* SON OF ALMUND *]. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote his name in capitals and lined it through in red, treatment reserved for different subtenants 
of Earl Roger (SHR 4 Roger note), suggesting that he was not absolutely convinced that this Alward was the same as the Alward who held the preceding estate (4,27,23); similarly for the Alward of the next entry (4,27,25). However, the fact that he put thes
e
 three estates together might suggest that his conviction was not strong, as he made no attempt to detail the subtenancies of a man called Siward together (4,27,11;14;32), despite the fact that these Siwards may have been the same person (4,27,32 Siward n
ote). The fact that all three holdings of Alward (4,27,23-25) descend to Montgomery suggests, but does not prove, that one person was involved.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab On the identification of Alward as the son of Almund, see 4,27,17 Almund note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab RHISTON. It lay in that part of
 Churchstoke Ancient Parish that was in Shropshire. It was in Wittery Hundred in 1086, later in Chirbury Hundred, and descended to Montgomery honour. The Domesday vill will have included Brompton (SO2593) for in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 965, 973, Maurice }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Hop' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds one-eighth fee in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Brocton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (i.e. }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bromton'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Russeton}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . \'bd hide is held in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ristu' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 60b, with service at Montgomery, and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Brompton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is held in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 241, from Montgomery castle; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 631; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 p. 71.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27,25\tab ALWARD [* SON OF ALMUND *]. On the possibility that he is not the same man as the Alward in 4,27,23 or the one in 4,27,24, see 4,27,24 Alward note. See also 4,27,17 Almund note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 
CHURCHSTOKE. The township lay in that part of Churchstoke Ancient Parish that has been in Montgomeryshire since the abolition of the Marcher lordships in 1536. It was in Wittery Hundred in 1086, then in Chirbury Hundred. After 1086 it was at first part
 of the honour of Montgomery, then became royal demesne. Before it did so, Robert }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Boilers }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
had given the mill to the Augustinian canons of Snead: Fletcher, 'Three Early Shropshire Charters', p. 60. Later Churchstoke (with Hurdley, Hyssington and Snead) went to form the manor of Halcetor; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. pp. 70-73; Mountford, 'Manor of Halcetor'; Davies, 'Lordships and Manors', p. 119. The church was held by the prior of Chirbury in 1291: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 162b.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a space suitable for about six letters after the woodland detail, rather small for the later insertion of another resource; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27,26\tab ROWTON. This place was formerly in the Ancient 
Parish of Ercall Magna (also known as High Ercall). It is now a separate Ecclesiastical Parish, but remains for civil purposes in Ercall Magna Civil Parish. It lay in Hodnet Hundred in 1086, later in 'Bradford' Hundred. It was one of those lands given by 
Henry II to Iorwerth Goch for interpreter service in Wales (4,23,7 Ellerdine note; 4,23,16 Sutton note). In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 147, his son Gruffydd }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Sutton' }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ruelton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and Ellerdine (4,23,7), Sutton Maddock and Brockton (4,23,16 and 4,23,16 Sutton note). }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rowelton' }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is held by Madoc }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Sutton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 57a, by serjeanty; its 3 hides will probably have included Ellerdine as well. These two places are associated in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 118, in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 220, and in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. no. 52. See Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 239.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab DOT. For a discussion of this personal name, see von Feilitzen, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 p. 226.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab A PRIEST. His church was probably at High Ercall (4,1,21); see the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, i. pp. 32, 37, 69); Lewis, 'Introduction', }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Shropshire Domesday}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 24.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27,27\tab IN BASCHURCH HUNDRED. In the Alecto facsimile the last letter of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 BASECHERC}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  resembles an }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 O}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
; see 3c,7 Perkley note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 
LEATON. It formerly lay in the Ancient Parish of Shrewsbury St Mary, but is now in Pimhill Civil Parish and a separate Ecclesiastical Parish. It was in Baschurch Hundred in 1086, later in Pimhill Hundred and became a serjeanty. Roger de }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Leeton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 1 hide in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Leeton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 76a, by service at Shrewsbury Castle; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 535, v. no. 87, x. no. 103; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 208. Another hide in Leaton was probably part of Albrighton in 1086: 4,3,71 Albrighton note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HUNNING <OF LAWLEY>. See 4,3,56 Hunning note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a third of a line after the settlers, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27,28\tab 'YAGDONS'. In the manuscript the name is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 IAGEDONE}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; Farley misprinted }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 LAGEDONE}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
. For another example of his printing }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 L }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 for }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 I}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  in a place-name, see 4,4,11 Yockleton note.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 'Yadgons' is now in Leaton Ecclesiasti
cal Parish and in Pimhill Civil Parish, but was formerly in the Ancient Parish of Shrewsbury St Mary. The Domesday vill is now only represented by Yagdons Lane (Yaggons Lane on the six-inch Ordnance Survey map of 1888). It lay in Baschurch Hundred in 1086
, later in Pimhill Hundred. 'Yagdons' went to the Fitz Alan fief, being held under it by the de Rossalls. Thus in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 75b, Thomas }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Roshal }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
holds 1 carucate in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Jagedon' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 of the fee of John Fitz Alan. It appears with Rossall and Yeaton (4,3,55-56) in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, v. no. 243, of Thomas }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Rossall}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 207; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 232.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27,29\tab POYNTON AND "TUNESTAN". These two }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  manors with different names seem to have been combined into one, the name }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Tunestan }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 dying out, probably soon after 1086 as it has not been found in any later record. Both were in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086, and Poynton (which was in the Ancient Parish of Ercall Magna, also known as High 
Ercall) was later in 'Bradford' Hundred. Poynton became part of the honour of Montgomery and was held under its lords by a family named from the place: in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 56a, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pevinton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 at 1 \'bd hides (which presumably included }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Tunestan) }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is held by Philip }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Pevinton' as }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 a fee of William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Cantelupo }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (i.e. of Montgomery honour); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bradford Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 113; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 220; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 1.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Scribe B interlined }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 7 TVNESTAN}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  above }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 PEVENTONE}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; he did no
t feel it necessary to include an insertion mark. It is not rubricated; see 4,8,1 Moreton note. He may have been responsible for the erasure of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 geld'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  in the next line; see 4,29,29 hides note.}{\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 \'bd}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 HIDES [***]. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 geld' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 has been scraped off after }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 dimid'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
; it is still visible, though faint. Compare 4,19,4 hides note, 4,27,2 hides note, 4,27,3 hide note and 4,27,9 hide note, and see 1,5 hide note on the spaces left after the hidage by the main scribe of Great Domesday. It is not clear why}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  geld' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 should have been erased: if it were found out that these two manors did not pay tax, a }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 non }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
could have been easily inserted, though it is possible that the intention was to write }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 non geld' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in the space. It may be that the erasure was done when }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 7}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 TVNESTAN }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 was interlined: perhaps Poynton paid tax but }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Tunestan }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 did not.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27,30\tab IT HAS BEEN SUGGESTED that this entry and the next five (4,27,31-35), the last in this sub-chapter, were added, together with sub-chapter 4,28 and chapters 5-8: Lewis, 'Introduction', }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Shropshire Domesday}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 12. However, there is no sign of a change in pen, ink or style at this point in the manuscript. See L5 Osbern note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab RICHARD [* OF MONTGAROULT *]. See 4,12 Richard note. This entry is a duplicate of 4,12,1.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab BROCKTON. This place was in Longford Ancient Parish and lay in Wrockwardine Hundred in 1086. This entry is a duplicate of 4,12,1, which was a later addition (see 4,12,1 this entry note).}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab AISIL. On this name, see 4,12,1 Aisil note. The duplicate entry (4,12,1) adds that he held the \'bd hide}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in Brockton 'as one manor'.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 FREE MAN PAYS 16d IN REVENUE. On the practice of 'farming', see 3d,5 revenue note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27,31\tab SIWARD. See 4,27,32 Siward note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HALSTON? AND "BURTONE".}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 This pair of names has not been satisfactorily identified. Eyton (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 43) left }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Haustune }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 unidentified and took }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Burtone }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
as Porkington/Brogyntyn. But his descent for Porkington is unsatisfactory (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 343 note 118) and the etymology from }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Burtone }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 impossible (Ekwall, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Dictionary of English Placenames}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , under Porkington; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p.

\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab xii). }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 343, suggested Halston? (the same place as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Halstune}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  in 4,3,32)}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 and Brogyntyn?, which are, however, far apart. There is no philological difficulty in taking }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Haustune }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 as an alternative for}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Halstune}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, but the identification of both places requires further study.
\par \tab \tab If Halston is the correct identification, it lay in Whittington Ancient Parish. It will have been drawn into a Welshry after 1086 and only returned to Shropshire in 1536 at the dissolution of the Marcher lordships.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27,32\tab SIWARD [* THE FAT *]. This Siward is identifiable as Siward }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Grossus }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(the Shrewsbury Cartulary: Rees, no. 1). He is probably the same as the Siward who held Hollow Court in Worcestershire (HEF 1,41) where he is described as a thane and kinsman of King Edward. Orderic Vitalis, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Ecclesiastical History }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Chibnall, ii. p. 416), in his account of the founding of St Peter's Abbey, Shrewsbury, states that 'Siward son of Aethelgar, a kinsman (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 consanguineus}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
of King Edward' had built 'in earlier times' a wooden chapel dedicated to St Peter. Siward was persuaded by Earl Roger to give him the site in exchange for Cheney Longville so that he could found the Abbey of St Peter (SHR 3b): the Shrewsbury Ca
rtulary (Rees, nos. 1, 35).
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab This Siward was brother of Aldred and it is possible that these are the two men whose }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 T.R.E}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
. holdings were the only ones held by Roger of Lacy directly from the king (SHR 7 Roger note). They were probably the grandchildren of 
Edward the Confessor's half-sister Edith who was married to Edric Streona Ealdorman of Mercia from 1007 to 1017. They were thus cousins of Edric the wild (4,1,14 Edric note); Orderic Vitalis, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Ecclesiastical History}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880  (Chibnall, iii. pp. 6-7); Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 291, xi. p. 370; Williams, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 The English and the Norman Conquest}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 93; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 421.
\par \tab \tab It is possible that the Siwards of 4,27,11;14;31 are the same man, as are some other Siwards in Shropshire, but the nam
e was a common one. The main scribe of Great Domesday did not appear to connect the 1086 holders called Siward in this sub-chapter, as he did not place them together as he did the holdings of Alward son of Almund (4,27,17-21) and see 4,27,24 Alward note.}
{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 
[CHENEY] LONGVILLE. This place was in Wistanstow Ancient Parish. It lay in Leintwardine Hundred in 1086 and was later in Purslow Hundred. Siward had held it before 1066, but not continuously afterwards, since the Shrewsbury Cartulary records that it was g
i
ven to him by Earl Roger in exchange: see 4,27,32 Siward note. Siward also gave Cheney Longville to the abbey which subsequently exchanged it with Henry de Say, lord of Clun, for Brompton (4,20,1): the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. xi-xii, 1, 3, 30, 33,
 37 etc.). }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Longefeud}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \'bd hide, is held by Cecilia }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Wolv'eslawe }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 77a, of John Fitz Alan with suit and service at Clun Castle. Roger }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Cheveney }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 or }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 le Cheyne }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 233, 238; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 812; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 963: Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 369. }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Longefeld }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is associated with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Streforde }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Strefford: 4,3,47) in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 194 (of Philip }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Burnel}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ).}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank almost half a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27,33\tab ALDRED [* BROTHER OF SIWARD *]. See 4,3,15 Aldred note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ACTON [SCOTT]. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Leintwardine Hundred in 1086, later in Munslow Hundred. It went to the Fitz Alan barony with Lestrange as mesne lord. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 70a, four men, including Reginald }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Scot'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hold 2 hides in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Acton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hennel' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Henley SO4588) from John }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Extraneus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 It is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Acton in Longefeld }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 222, and }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Scotus Acton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 held by the Earl of Arundel (Fitz Alan barony) in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 229. See Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 375; and 4,3,47 Strefford note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab EDRIC [* THE WILD *]. He was possibly Edric the wild; see 4,1,14 Edric note. Aldred, the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 holder of Acton, was probably the brother of Siward [* the fat *] who held Cheney Longville (4,27,32). Siward was a cousin of Edric the wild; see Williams, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The English and the Norman Conquest}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 91; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 11.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27,34\tab IWAR <OF "NEWETONE". The Domesday form }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Iward}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ] probably represents the same name as the }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Juuar}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  who occurs twice in Staffordshire as a 1066 holder of two adjacent estates in the king's hands }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (STS 1,54-55): Old Danish }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Iwar }{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Old Norse }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ivarr}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , Old Swedish }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ivar}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ): von Feilitzen, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 300; see Forssner, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Continental-Germanic Personal Names in England}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 286. The printed Phillimore edition has the form Ivar, though JRM's policy was to prefer the Old Danish over the Old Swedish name-form; it has therefore been altered for the present edition. The Alecto edition has Iwar.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab It is unlikely that this 1086 tenant of Earl Roger was the same as Iwar who held }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  in Staffordshire.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab "NEWETONE".}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 There appears to be no place called 'Newton' now existing in the area occupied in 1086 by "Merset" Hundred. There is a }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Newton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 associated with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Caldecot }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(Caldicott or The Heath in Knockin, SJ3522) later held by Haughmond Abbey and lying in the diocese of St Asaph: the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, no. 207). This may have been "Newetone", but it is lost: Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 376, xi. p. 22.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a third of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,27,35\tab ALCHERE <OF LE PIN>. See 4,3,4 Alchere note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HARCOURT. The Domesday form is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Havretescote}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
. This estate was later divided into 'Great' Harcourt and 'Little' Harcourt, alternatively Upper Harcourt (which survives at SO6982) and 'Lower' Harcourt (lost): }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 144. The place was in Stottesdon Ancient Parish. It lay in 'Conditre' Hundred in 1086, later in Stottesdon Hundred. It became a serjeanty. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 82a, John }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 filius Cleri }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (i.e. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 filius Aeri}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  that is Fitz Ayer) holds \'bd hide by serjeanty in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hauerkercot'}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 217, 232; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 108a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 115, iv. no. 181, v. no. 470, ix. no. 459, x. no. 320; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 180.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab ALWARD [* SON OF ALMUND *]. See 3f,2 Alward note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,28\tab 
[WHAT EARL ROGER HIMSELF HOLDS]. This appears to be an appendix of miscellaneous lands mainly held by Earl Roger in chief. Entries 4,28,1-3;6 rightly belong in 4,1, as do the two manors of 4,28,4 dependent on Stretton (4,1,27). But 4,28,5
 is an outlier of a Herefordshire manor held directly from the king.
\par \tab \tab There is no sign, however, that it was a later addition (Lewis, 'Introduction', }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Shropshire Domesday}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 12); see 4,27,30 has note. As he worked through the lands of Earl Roger, the main
 scribe of Great Domesday probably found several that he had omitted from 4,1 and kept them until the end, rather than add so many in the foot margin of folio 254a, as he had failed to leave a space after 4,1.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab The hundredal order of this sub-chapter is as follows (the bracketed numbers are explained in SHR 4 arrangement note):
\par \tab \tab 4,28,1-2 Condover Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,28,3 Baschurch Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,28,4 Leintwardine Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,28,5 'Conditre' Hundred
\par \tab \tab 4,28,6 "Merset" Hundred}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,28,1\tab BROOME. This place lay in Cardington Ancient Parish and was in Munslow Hundred in the Middle Ages, but in Condover Hundred in 1086. It was probably part of the estate at Plaish (4,8,12) granted in 963 (}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Early Charters of the West Midlands}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , no. 431 p. 149 = Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , no. 72
3); see 4,8,12 Plaish note. The entry is incomplete and the manor is not well represented in later records. The facts that Austin who held part of it before 1066 had also held part of Cardington (4,3,44, which was adjacent but in "Culvestan" Hundred), and
 that Reginald (the holder of \'bd
 virgate of it) is probably Reginald the sheriff, the 1086 holder of Cardington, may explain the manor's disappearance and transfer to Munslow Hundred: it was probably absorbed by Cardington soon after Domesday. See Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 243; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 32.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THORSTEN <OF HARCOURT> AND AUSTIN HELD IT. The main scribe of Great Domesday originally wrote }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 tenuit}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , then (presumably when he interlined }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 7}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Austin' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 was interlined, though the ink is paler) he interlined an }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 r}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, extending it down over the remains of the partially-erased }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 t}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; a small faint }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 e }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 can be seen before the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
r }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and a line was drawn over the top of the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 it}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
probably as a deletion line. The correction is not as clear as it appears in Farley.
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab For Thorsten, see 4,14,10 Thorsten note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [VALUE ***]. See 4,3,25 value note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,28,2\tab NETLEY. This place lay in Stapleton Ancient Parish. It was in Condover Hundred in 1086 and was probably merged soon after Domesday with the two Stapleton manors (4,4,2. 4,27,9); see Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 297; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , viii. p. 165.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 NETELIE}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  and the following two sentencies over a large erasure. It is possible that he had written details of the wrong holding here;
 compare 6,30 hide note. The words are blurred, so he may have corrected them at an early stage and did not wait until the surface of the parchment had been properly re-prepared for writing after the erasure.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,28,3\tab FENEMERE. The place lay in Baschurch Anc
ient Parish. In 1086 it was in Baschurch Hundred, later in Pimhill Hundred. It appears to have been given soon after Domesday to Rainer the reeve and conveyed by him to Shrewsbury Abbey as }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
quandam terrulam cum lacu qui vocatur Finemera }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ('a small piece of land with a lake called }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Finemera}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
'): the Shrewsbury Cartulary (Rees, pp. 34, 39). But it seems to have passed from the abbey to the Fitz Alans, for in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pimhill Hundred Roll}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 120, Roger }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
de Acton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Fenymer }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from Richard son of Alan; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, x. p. 289. The 'mere' which names the place is still a notable feature.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,28,4\tab EARL LEOFRIC. See 3b,2 Leofric note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab MINTON AND WHITTINGSLOW. Minton was in the Ancient Parish of Church Stretton, now in the Civil Parish of Little 
Stretton; Whittingslow was in Wistanstow Ancient Parish. Whittingslow passed to Munslow Hundred and the honour of Montgomery (see 4,1,15 Montgomery note), being }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wittokeslawe }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
among the fees of William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Cantilupo }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 966, where it is held by Nicholas }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Opton' }
{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and his partners; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 245; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 17; Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xii. p. 4.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Minton (also in Munslow Hundred) became a serjeanty, held for guarding the forest of the Long Mynd and the hays at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bissemor' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Bushmoor SO4387) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Hauechurche' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Hawkhurst in Cwm Head, SO4288); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 7, 383, 1184, 1244; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, i. nos. 473, 534, ii. no. 511, v. no. 8, vi. nos. 490, 720; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , x. p. 90. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 512, it is }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Muneton in Strettonesdale }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (see 4,1,27 Stretton note).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab INCLUDED IN THE REVENUE OF. On the meaning of}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  firma }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 here, see 4,8,8 revenue note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab STRETTON. Earl Roger's manor is 4,1,27.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,28,5\tab WIDARD <OF FARLOW>. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab FARLOW. It is now a parish, but with a more complex earlier history. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrongly placed it among this appendix to Earl Roger's lands, for the text ma
kes clear that Widard held directly from the king. But although surveyed in 'Conditre' Hundred, it was in fact an outlier of Leominster in Herefordshire. The latter was a large composite manor, formerly ecclesiastical and temporarily in royal hands; see H
EF 1,10a Farlow note; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 191. Farlow was later regarded as a chapelry of Stottesdon Ancient Parish, the only part of that parish to be in Herefordshire, in which county it remained until 1844.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab IS ASSESSED. The Ordnance Survey facsimile does not reproduce the abbreviation line on the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \'e7}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
: it is faint in the manuscript, but is visible in the Alecto facsimile. See 3f,7 plough note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 4,28,6\tab "WLFERESFORDE". It lay in "Merset" Hundred, but is unidentified. There is a place named }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wulfheresford }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Patent Rolls (1262)}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 207, but that appears to be near Wenlock; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 43.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 2 HIDES. In the manuscript there is no dot after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 hid\'ea }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 which is written hard up against the side marginal r
uling, so the main scribe of Great Domesday probably intended writing into the margin when he found out whether the hides paid tax; see 4,3,35 hides note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab A SMALL WOOD. On Latin }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 silua parua}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , see 4,1,4 wood note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 5\tab LAND OF OSBERN SON OF RICHARD. }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Osbern was the }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
son of Richard Scrope (or Richard Scrob), a Norman who settled on the border in Herefordshire and Shropshire at the time of the Confe
ssor and continued to hold land there after the Conquest. Osbern married Nesta, a daughter of Gruffyd ap Llywellyn. He had a son, Hugh, and a daughter who married Bernard of Neufmarch\'e9. Osbern succeeded to most of his father\rquote 
s lands and was lord of Richards Castle in Herefordshire, which Richard had built. These lands lay near a particularly vulnerable part of the border since two-thirds of them had been waste at some stage in the previous twenty years.}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Most of his Osbern's lands in Herefordshire and Shropshire formed part of the honour of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Castrum Ricardi }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (\lquote Richards Castle\rquote 
). From Osbern they passed to his son Hugh, then to another Osbern and a further two Hughs, the last one dying in 1197 and leaving a daughter Margaret (de Say). She first married Hugh de
 Ferrers and her third marriage was to William de Stuteville, but the barony descended to Hugh Mortimer son of her second marriage (to Robert of Mortimer), then to Robert II and Hugh II. The barony was divided between Hugh II's daughters Joan (who married
 Thomas }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Bykenore, }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 then Richard Talbot) and Margaret who married Geoffrey of Cornwall, then William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Evereys. See Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 301; Sanders, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 English Baronies}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 75; }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Keats-Rohan, }{
\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 316.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  The barony is sometimes called \lquote of Burford\rquote  from Burford (SHR 5,1), the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 caput }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of Osbern\rquote s Shropshire lands.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Many of these lands reappear in Inquisitions Post Mortem of the Mortimers of Richards Castle; see especially }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 640, iv. no.
 221, v. nos. 57-58. Another branch of the family were the lords of Wigmore (SHR 6 Ralph note).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab None of the estates in this chapter nor those in SHR 6-9 lay north of Shrewsbury and with only a few exceptions all are found in the southernmost hundreds of 
Leintwardine, "Culvestan", 'Overs' and 'Conditre'. That they are held from the king and not from Earl Roger suggests either that the king reserved for himself on the Marches a slice of territory between the 'palatine' earldoms of Earl Roger and Earl Willi
am son of Osbern; or more likely that this tract of country was originally under the control of the latter and was forfeited to the Crown on his son's rebellion; see \{Introduction: History\}
. Intermingled with these lands on the ground, however, are vills in the same hundreds held by the same Osbern son of Richard (SHR 5), Ralph of Mortimer (SHR 6) and Roger of Lacy (SHR 6) from Earl Roger in 4,17. 4,11 and 4,8.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab In these chapters the hundreds are not arranged in the sequence which applies to a number of sub-
chapters in Earl Roger's fief (SHR 4 arrangement note), nor do they share a similar sequence themselves. The hundredal order of chapter 5 is as follows:
\par \tab \tab 5,1-2 'Overs' Hundred}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 5,3 "Culvestan" Hundred}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 5,4-7 Leintwardine Hundred}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 5,8 'Conditre' Hundred}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab (5,9 'Overs' Hundred)
\par \tab The apparent repeat of 'Overs' Hundred is caused by 5,9 Milson being an outlier of Neen Sollars (5,8) and so entered after it.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 5,1\tab BURFORD. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in 'Overs' Hundred in 1086 and later, becoming the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 caput }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
of Osbern's Shropshire barony and ultimately of the Mortimer sub-barony of Burford. It may have been the principal manor of 'Overs' Hundred: \{Introduction: Hundreds\}. Burford itself is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Bureford' }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 1284, held by William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Stutevill' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and
 belonging to Richards Castle. It is held as a 'free manor' by the same man in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 74a, and by Robert }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Mortuo Mari }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of the barony of Burford in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 216; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 103ab; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 234, 242; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 439, ii. nos. 132, 640, iv. no. 221, v. no. 57. }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Burford }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is coupled with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Stepelton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Stapleton 5,5 Stanage note) in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vii. no. 715, viii. no. 111. Burford had a number of members. Among them were probably:
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Grete }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Greete SO5770) held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 965, 973, of the barony of William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Stotevill'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 74a; the Red Book of the Exchequer (Hall, ii. p. 604); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 216, 234, 243; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 640, v. no. 57, ix. nos. 23, 445; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 165a;
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Stota }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Stoke SO5671), \'bd hide, held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 74a, by Agnes }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Stota }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from William }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Stutevil'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see the Red Book of the Exchequer (Hall, ii. p. 604); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 214, 234, 243; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}
{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 640;
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Tileshop' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Tilsop SO6172) held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 965, 973, of the barony of William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Stotevill'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
; see the Red Book of the Exchequer (Hall, ii. p. 604); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 74a (where it is given as 1 hide in extent); }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 216, 243; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 640, v. nos. 57, 90;
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Wn'tone }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Wooton? SO5773), \'bc hide, held by Hugh }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Carbonel }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Stutevil }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 74a;
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Wetemora }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Watmore SO6171) held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 74a, by Ernald }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Barkeley }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 of the fee of }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bureford}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 965; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 243;
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Esses }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Nash SO6071), \'be hide, held by William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Clifford }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from John }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Est'rmi }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 74a;
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Westona }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Weston SO5871), 1 hide, held by Philip }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Thou't }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from Peter de }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Grete}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 a fee of Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Clifford}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 74a; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 243; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 640, v. no. 57;
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Wyttone }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Whitton SO5772), \'bd hide, in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 74a; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 234; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. no. 387;
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Cromwode }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ('Cornwood' in Knigh
ton on Teme, Worcestershire, represented by Cornwood Common, now Knighton Common, on the first series Ordnance Survey one-inch map at SO6270). This went to Haughmond Abbey; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 163b; the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees, nos. 263-66, 1300);
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Burestone }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Boraston SO6170), 2 hides, held by the prior of Worcester by gift of the predecessor of William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Stutevil'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 74a;
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Herthale }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Harthall SO5970), \'bd hide, held by Agnes }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Greta }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from Peter }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Grete }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 74b;
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Hulla }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Court-of-Hill? SO6072), 1 hide, held from Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Pynlesdone}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Fees, p. 965; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 216. Osbern held another 'Hill' associated with Overton, just over the border in Herefordshire (HEF 24,12).
\par \tab \tab For the church of Burford, see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 165b. On the whole manor, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 301.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab In 1086 Osbern held Ludford, which was adjacent to Burford, but in Herefordshire. It was transferred to Shropshire soon after. See HEF 24,12 Ludford note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab RICHARD ^[SCROPE]^. The fact that the 1086 holder is Osbern son of Richard makes it certain that his father was Richard Scrope.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab A CHURCH. On the possibility that this was the minster church for the territory dependent on Burford and later for 'Overs' Hundred, see \{Introduction: Ecclesiastical Organization\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WITH 2 PRIESTS. Or perhaps 'and 2 priests': the main scribe of Great Domesday corrected either }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 7}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  to }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 c\'fb}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  or vice versa. The same thing happens several times elsewhere in Great Domesday and in 4,27,19 and 7,4 here the scribe began to write }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 cum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , but stopped after }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  and wrote }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 7}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  over i.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 23 PLOUGHS. [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining quarter of a line after}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 xxiii car'.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; the parchment is rub
bed here but there is no sign of an erasure. It is not clear what, if anything, he meant to add; see 3f,2 church note on the few other instances of this.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining quarter of a line after the hedged enclosure, perhaps for the later insertion of another resource; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 5,2\tab TE}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 TSTILL. This was in the Ancient Parish of Neen Sollars. It lay in 'Overs' Hundred in 1086 and later. This 1 hide holding was at }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Tetneshulle }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Marebroc }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Marlbrook SO6670), held by Adam }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Arundellia }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
in the Red Book of the Exchequer (Hall, ii. p. 604) of the honour of Richards Castle. Marlbrook probably stands for both in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 965, 973, where Adam }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
de Arondel }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds \'bd fee in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Merebroc }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from the barony of William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Stotevill'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 74a, where John }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Arundel }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
holds 1 hide in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Marebroke }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from Thomas }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Corbet}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 see }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 216, 243; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. no. 640, v. no. 57. The Corbets held from the Mortimers in the case of Tetstill and Marlbrook, but these two manors are coupled in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 635, with }
{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Habberleye }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (4,4,20) held of the barony of Corbet of Cause. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Maerebroc }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
had once been a possession of Worcester Church but taken from it by Earl Swein; see Hemming's Cartulary (Hearne }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Hemingi Chartularium}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 276: folio 129r). Swein was Swein Godwinson, Earl of the West Midlands 1043-1051. It is possible that this was a former comital estate: Williams, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The English and the Norman Conquest}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 93.}
{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab On the whole manor, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 349; the Herefordshire Domesday (Galbraith and Tait), p. 119.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab SAEWARD [* SIWARD THE FAT *]. Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Sauuard}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 may be a scribal error for }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Seuuard}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 or }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Siuuard}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 us}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ],}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
that is 'Siward', as Siward was Osbern's predecessor at Neen Sollars which is adjacent to Tetstill. See 4,3,3 Saeward note and 7,1 Saeward note. This man may be Siward son of Aethelgar: 4,27,32 Siward note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 5,3\tab 
ASHFORD [CARBONELL]. This was a township of the Ancient Parish of Little Hereford (which was otherwise entirely in Herefordshire), then a Shropshire Ancient Parish in its own right. It lay in "Culvestan" Hundred in 1086, later in Munslow Hundr
ed. 'Ashford' seems to have been the name of an area lying on both sides of the River Teme in 1086, represented later by Ashford Carbonell, Ashford Bowdler (in Herefordshire in 1086) and 'Ashford Jones' (4,11,2 Huntington note). }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Esseford }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 was held by Hugh }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Carbonel }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in the Red Book of the Exchequer (Hall, ii. p. 604) of the honour of Richards Castle, while in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 70a, William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Stutevile }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 1 \'bd hides in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Aysford Carbonel}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 965;}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 223, 229, 245; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 640, v. no. 57, x. no. 426; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 81.}{
\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Another part of Ashford, probably Ashford Bowdler, was apparently a dependency of Bromfield (3d,6) in 1086.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab LETHI. The Domesday form }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ledi }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 represents Old Norse }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lethi}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 319. This is the only occurrence of the name in Domesday Book.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining half a line after the mill detail, perhaps for the later insertion of the woodland or other resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 5,4\tab KINSHAM?. The Domesday form is }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Humet}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
. Upper Kinsham (SO3664) was an Ancient Parish, in Herefordshire since the dissolution of the Marcher lordships in the sixteenth century. Lower Kinsham (SO3564) was also in Herefordshire from the same date, but was a township of Presteigne Ancient Parish,
 
which was divided between Radnorshire and Herefordshire: two wards of Presteigne itself and the township of Discoed lay in Radnorshire while all the rest lay in Herefordshire, the townships of Lower Kinsham, Stapleton and Willey lying north of the River L
u
gg, the townships of Combe, Rodd, Nash and Little Brampton south of it. The date of this division between the counties is uncertain (see below). In 1086, the River Lugg seems to have been the principal division between Shropshire and Herefordshire, with t
he places north of the Lugg being in Shropshire and those south of it in Herefordshire. Kinsham lay in Leintwardine Hundred in 1086.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The suggestion is that }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Humet}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  is at least to be identified with Kinsham, and probably with both Kinsham and Presteigne, though these identifications are tentative; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Humet}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 was left unidentified in the Phillimore printed edition and in the Alecto edition. These two adjacent places, Presteigne (SO3164) and Kinsham, seem to contain the same element and appear to be named by reference to each other. Ekwall (}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Dictionary of English Placenames}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , under Presteigne) and Smith in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 English Place-Name Element}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 s (under }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 haemed}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
), took this element as Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 haemed}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , used in the rare sense of 'household'. More recently Margaret Gelling in the etymologies she provided for Copplestone-Crow, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Herefordshire Place-Names}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (under Presteigne, pp. 117-18) has suggested derivation from Old English}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  hemm-maed}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, meaning 'meadow on a boundary', referring to the well-watered nature of the site beside the River Lugg and the proximity to the then boundary between Shropshire and Wales. The two places are thus respectively the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 haemed}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880  or }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 hemm-maed}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  of the priests and of the king. It is not clear when this distinction arose, though it was probably before 1066 when }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Humet}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  wa
s held by King Edward; it might have been held by earlier kings. There is no later record of it being in royal hands. Soon after the Conquest it will probably have been granted to Earl William; see \{Introduction: History\}
. Certainly it is tempting to think of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Humet}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
's being a single estate, later divided between a priests' part and a royal part, the latter being subsequently further divided into Upper Kinsham and Lower Kinsham. It is even more tempting to believe that the distinction already existed in 1066 
and 1086, but was subsumed by a single name. A royal site and a priests' site within the same estate suggests the presence of an ancient royal estate complemented by a Saxon minster church containing secular priests or canons. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Humet}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  was waste in 1066 and all but the lordship was in 1086, so this negative evidence can be argued either way.
\par \tab \tab The first occurrence of the differentiated forms Presteigne and Kinsham are, however, after 1086. In a list of lands (dating from 1137 x 1139) attached to the Herefordsh
ire Domesday (Galbraith and Tait, p. 79) Osbern son of Richard holds 7 hides in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Prestehemed }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Presteigne, in Radnorshire, not mentioned in Domesday). These 7 hides could be the 5 hides of }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Humet}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  plus the 2 hides of Clatterbrune (HEF 24,3) which now lies in that part of Presteigne that is south of the River Lugg . }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Kingesmede}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 is found in 1210-1212 (the Red Book of the Exchequer: Hall, p. 512) and in 1216 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Litterarum Clausarum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 279b; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Litterarum Patentium}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 92), the year in which King John stayed at Kinsham on a journey from Radnor to Clun.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab It is likely that a number of the townships later counted as part of Presteigne were part of the 1086 estate of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Humet}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 . Thus in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. no. 235 (of Edmund }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Mortuo Mari}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ),}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  La Humede }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is held with a place called }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Chesewaldesleye}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 also unidentified, although the etymology of Kinseys (SO3269, near Willey Lodge) requires investigation; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 343. The manors of Kinsham, Willey (SO3265) and Stapleton (SO3265) were held of the honour of Richards Castle. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wylyleye }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Willey) is held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. no. 221, by Hugh }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Mortuo Mari }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 of Richards Castle; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, v. no. 57. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Overkyngesheinde }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Netherkyngesheinde }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Upper and Lower Kinsham) are held by Ralph de Lingen from the lords of Richards Castle in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 640; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. no. 58, viii. no. 456. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stepelton }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Stapleton SO3265) is coupled with Burford (5,1) in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vii. no. 715, viii. no. 111; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 640, iv. no. 221; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 344.
\par \tab \tab On the dissolution of the Marcher lord
ships, Kinsham was placed in Herefordshire, and Presteigne apparently in Radnorshire. It is perhaps significant that the portion of Presteigne lying south of the River Lugg and lying in Radnorshire until 1974 is only incorporated in that county by a curio
u
s loop of the county boundary which turns south at SO320634 to join the Summergil Brook, follows it eastwards to its confluence with the River Lugg then follows that river westwards to a point (at SO310650) where it leaves the river and heads northwards. 
T
his is a circuit of some 7 kilometres, whereas, had the boundary turned northwards at SO310630, it would have skirted Presteigne on the western side and rejoined the later county boundary in under two kilometres. It is thus possible that this part of Pres
t
eigne was incorporated in Radnorshire later than 1536, and that initially, on the dissolution of the Marcher lordships, the whole of Presteigne both north and south of the River Lugg was put in Herefordshire. It also seems probable that in 1086, Presteign
e lay entirely north of the river in Shropshire and it and Clatterbrune lying in Herefordshire stood for what became Presteigne south of the river.
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The matter of boundaries and these identifications need further investigation.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 
EXCEPT FOR THE LORDSHIP ... 10s. A rare statement in Great Domesday, meaning that only what is in lordship has a value. It is also unusual for men-at-arms, rather than Osbern as 1086 holder, to have a plough in lordship: the main scribe of Great Domesday 
or an earlier scribe in the Domesday process may have omitted to state that the two men-at-arms were Osbern's subtenants. Compare Exon}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
for DEV 19,36 where a villager has all the lordship land, and see DEV 3,91 lordship note for other examples of unusual tenures of lordship.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 5,5\tab 
STANAGE. This place was formerly in the Ancient Parish of Brampton Bryan which lay in Herefordshire, though Stanage itself was in Wales. Stanage has been a Civil Parish (in Radnorshire) since 1866. In 1086 it lay in Leintwardine Hundr
ed, was afterwards drawn out of the county and into a Marcher lordship, and was placed in Radnorshire in 1536 when the Marcher lordships were dissolved and Wales was shired. Stanage was held by de Brompton under the lords of Richards Castle. In }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 640 (of Robert }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Mortuo Mari}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ), Brian }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Brompton }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds the hamlet of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Stanegge}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iii. no. 291, v. nos. 58, 130, viii. no. 456; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 340.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 5,6\tab CAS
COB. In the sixteenth century Cascob was an Ancient Parish in Radnorshire which included the township of Litton and Cascob. This township was partly in Herefordshire until 1844 when this portion was transferred to Radnorshire. This reflects an earlier com
plexity. Cascob was in Leintwardine Hundred in 1086 but soon began to be moved into Marcher jurisdiction. A waste \'bd
 hide here, also held by Osbern son of Richard, is mentioned in Domesday Herefordshire (HEF 24,3) and said to lie in "Hezetre" Hundred and on 
the Welsh March. There is insufficient detail in the entries to determine whether the entries are duplicates, but to survey the same vill or two parts}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
of the same vill in different counties suggests an unclear boundary between Shropshire, Herefordshire and
 Wales. A natural boundary in this area would be the River Lugg: Norton and Ackhill surveyed in Shropshire lie to the north of it; Discoed and Clatterbrune in Herefordshire to the south. Yet Pilleth on its north side is surveyed in Herefordshire and Casco
b on its south side in both counties. See \{Introduction: County Boundary\}; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 302, 304, xi. p. 341. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. no. 221 of Hugh }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Mortuo Mari}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Cascop }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
is counted as a part of Herefordshire, as also in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. no. 235, where it is numbered among the hamlets of Radnor. By contrast, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Pullid }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Pilleth) is there counted in Shropshire.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab If the two Domesday entries for Cascob were indeed separate estates, it is possible that the Herefordshire one actually lay at Litton.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 5,7\tab ACKHILL. This lay in the Ancient Parish of Presteigne (which was in Radnorshire from 1536 until 1974). It was in Leintwardine Hundred in 1086, and drawn thereafter into Marcher jurisdiction th
ough it was still recorded in Shropshire in 1304 when }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Akhull }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 was held by Edmund }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Mortuo Mari }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. no. 235); see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 343. There is also an Oakhill Wood in the same hundred just sou
th-east of Bucknell (SO3673, part of Coxall Knoll Wood).
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 main scribe of Great Domesday failed to rubricate }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 ACHEL}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
; for his failure to rubricate two other place-names and two hundred heads in Shropshire, see 4,3,8 St Peter note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 3 HIDES. The }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii hid\'ea}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  was written by the main scribe of Great Domesday over an erasure.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab LEAGUE. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 leuua}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Farley printed }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Leuua.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 5,8\tab NEEN [SOLLARS]. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in 'Conditre' Hundred in 1086 and later joined its outlier, Milson (5,9), in 'Overs' Hundred. In the Red Book of the Exchequer (Hall, ii. p. 604) William }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Solers }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Nene }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from the honour of Richards Castle, while in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 74a, three men hold }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Nene Bauwyn }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Solers }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of the barony of Burford; see }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 pp. 965, 973; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 104a; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 216, 234, 243; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 640, iv. no. 235, v. no. 57; }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 165b; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ix. p. 291.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab NEVER BEEN HIDATED, NOR ... PAID TAX. See 4,20,4 for the other manor in a similar position in Shropshire. This might be a sign that this was or was part of an ancient royal or comital manor. See Williams, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 The English and the Norman Conquest}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 93. She further 
suggests that this may have been an estate once held by Edric Streona, Ealdorman of Mercia (1007-1017), and that Siward is Siward son of Aethelgar; see 5,8 Siward note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab SIWARD [* THE FAT *]. This man may be Siward son of Aethelgar: 4,27,32 Siward note. However, the designation 'a free man' seems unlikely if a kinsman of King Edward is meant.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab A MEASURE OF CORN. The }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 modius }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
was a liquid and dry measure of uncertain size, possibly a bushel, of which the sester (4,17,3 sesters note) was a fraction. Compare 4,3,45 measures note and 4,27,21 measures note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 5,9\tab MILSON. This was an Ancient Parish, but united with the Ancient Parish of Neen Sollers before 1535. It was an outlier of Nene Sollars (5,8) in 1086, lying in 'Overs' Hundred where it remained. In }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 965, William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Mulston' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds \'bd}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 fee in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Mulston' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from the barony of Walter }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Stotevill'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 74a, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Mullestona }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is said to be 2 hides in extent. See }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 216, 234, 243; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 640, v. no. 57; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 346.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab SIWARD [* THE FAT *]. See 5,8 Siward note. On the possibility that he was the same person as Siward [the fat], on whom see 4,27,32 Siward note, see 4,1,34 Siward note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 6\tab LAND OF RALPH OF MORTIMER. He was the son of Roger of Mortimer (from Mortemer in the d\'e9partement of Seine-Maritime, France, arrondissement Dieppe, }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 canton Neufch\'e2tel-en-Bray)}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  and was probably the steward of Earl Roger of Shrewsbury (see Mason, \lquote Officers and Clerks\rquote , p. 248).
 His father Roger had held the fief before him and Roger or Ralph received a number of estates forfeited by Roger son of Earl William (of Hereford), Ralph's cousin, on his rebellion in 1074.}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 He became a supporter of William II and fought in Normandy in 1089-1090 against Robert Curthose, and he similarly supported Henry I against Robert in 1104; see }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Old English Bynames}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 101-102; }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Loyd, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Some Anglo-Norman Families}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 70; Sanders, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 English Baronies}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, p. 98; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 335.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Ralph\rquote 
s extensive lands in Shropshire and Herefordshire became the barony of Wigmore named from Wigmore Castle in Herefordshire (HEF 9,1), which had been built by Earl William, then given to "Turstin" of Flanders (also called "Turstin" 'of Wigmore') before co
ming to Ralph. The lands continued to be held by the various Mortimers of Wigmore, the last being Roger IV of Mortimer, created Earl of March in 1328 and executed in 1330: Sanders, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 English Baronies}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 98.

\par \tab \tab Wigmore itself became centre of a Marcher lordsh
ip and many of the lands lying in the south of Shropshire were taken from time to time either into the Liberty of Cleobury Mortimer or from the county, many of the latter group emerging ultimately in Herefordshire. This process can be observed clearly in 
the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Quo Waranto}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  pleas of 1290 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Placita de Quo Warranto}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, pp. 675, 681) which list the manors whose suit has been withdrawn from the county and question the Mortimers\rquote  right to hold Crown pleas. Conversely, Downton-on-the-Rock (H
EF 9,2, also held by Ralph of Mortimer) was sometimes counted in Munslow Hundred; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 963; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 244; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. no. 235. The lands of the barony are also found listed in the various Inquisitions relating to deaths in the Mortimer family of Wigmore; see especially }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , (old series) iii. no. 34, and (new series) iv. no. 235.
\par \tab \tab Wigmore Abbey, founded by Hugh of Mortimer and first sited at Shobdon in Shropshire, was richly endowed by the Mortimers; see Dickinson and Ricketts, 'Chronicle of Wigmore'; Banks, 'Charters of the Abbey of Wigmore'; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. pp. 344-346; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 iii. pp. 202-203; Knowles and Hadcock, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Medieval Religious Houses}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 159.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 
None of the estates in this chapter nor those in SHR 5, 7-9 lay north of Shrewsbury and with only a few exceptions all are found in the southernmost hundreds of Leintwardine, "Culvestan", 'Overs' and 'Conditre': SHR 5 Osbern note. Ralph's princip
al manor was Cleobury Mortimer (6,2) and that together with adjacent lands became the Liberty of Cleobury Mortimer. His lands in the extreme south of the county became part of the Mortimer lordship of Wigmore, based on Wigmore Castle (Herefordshire).}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab The hundredal order of this chapter is as follows:
\par \tab \tab 6,1 'Overs' Hundred}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 6,2-3 'Conditre' Hundred}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab (6,4 'Overs' Hundred)
\par \tab \tab 6,5-9 'Conditre' Hundred}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 6,10 "Culvestan" Hundred}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 6,11-29 Leintwardine Hundred}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 6,30-32 Condover Hundred
\par \tab \tab 6,33 Shrewsbury Hundred.
\par \tab 
The entry for Earls Ditton (6,4) appears to interrupt the sequence, but it is assessed with Cleobury Mortimer (6,2). The holdings in Condover Hundred and Shrewsbury Hundred that lay in the centre of the shire surrounded by manors held by or from Earl R
oger are entered last.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 6,1\tab CORELEY. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in 'Overs' Hundred in 1086 and later, although suit was withdrawn from the hundred and put to the court of Cleobury Mortimer (6,2) for a period. In 1255 (}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 74b) the 2 hides are represented by 1 hide held by Geoffrey }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Wn'ton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Overton) from Roger }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Mortuo Mari }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and 1 hide by Nicholas }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Hintes }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from the same Geoffrey (presumably under the same Roger); see }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 103b; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 243; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 357. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Overton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (4,11,16) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Cornleye }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 are held together by Geoffrey }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
de Overton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from Edmund }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Mortuo Mari }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. no. 235.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab SIWARD [* THE FAT *]. On the possibility that he was the same person as Siward [the fat], on whom see 4,27,32 Siward note, see 4,1,34 Siward note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 4 SLAVES. The main scribe of Great Domesday originally wrote }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  and then squeezed in a minim,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
the original dot after the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 being visible under this minim; he then interlined }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 or }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (for }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 quattuor}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ), as in 4,27,21, to clarify the correction.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 6,2\tab CLEOBURY [MORTIMER]. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in 'Conditre' Hundred in 1086, later in Stottesdon Hundred. From the mid-thirteenth 
century it was made into a Liberty by the Mortimers and most of their manors in the south of the county were drawn into it: SHR 6 Ralph note. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 1283, Roger }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Mortuo Mari }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds the manor }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of Cleybir' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 'with appurtenances' and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Chemers }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
(Chelmarsh: 4,11,6) while in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 81a, Roger holds }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Cleybur' Mortem'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, 5 hides, from the king in Stottesdon Hundred. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. no. 183, Roger }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Mortuo Mari }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Clebur(y) Mortimer }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Cheylmerch}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 with the members }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Ernewode }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Earnwood in Kinlet, SO7380) and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Huggeley }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Highley: 4,11,11). It is counted in the Liberty of Cleobury in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 246; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 963, 971; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 108a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 232; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 193. The church was given to Wigmore Abbey: }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 165b.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab In view of the large plough estimate, which is matched by the actual ploughs in use, this manor may have been beneficially hidated. Compare 4,1,4 hides note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [* QUEEN *] EDITH. She is probably Queen Edith (so }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 289 note 45; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 193), as she had been Ralph of Mortimer's predecessor in Leinthall in Herefordshire (HEF 9,7). Ralph's other predecesso
rs called Edith (6,9;30-31;33) may also be the queen. Compare 4,27,6 Edith note. On the name Edith, see C13 Edith note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 6,3\tab MAWLEY. This was in the Ancient Parish of Cleobury Mortimer. It lay in 'Conditre' Hundred in 1066, later in Stottesdon Hundred and, for a time, in the Liberty of Cleobury Mortimer. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 963, John }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Melleleg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Melleleg' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of the barony of Ralph }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Mortuo Mari}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 108a, records that Roger }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Mortuo Mari }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 has removed it from Stottesdon Hundred. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 247, includes it in the Liberty of Cleobury. See Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 228; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 289.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab "LEL"}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ... AND "FECH".}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Neither name has been identified with a place. However, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Fech}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  appears to be a personal name, for a }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Fech }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds Baveney (4,11,13; see 4,11,13 "Fech" note), a \'bd
 hide manor, along with an Alwy. One virgate of Baveney is there said to have lain in Cleobury Mortimer before 1066. The Latin here should therefore probably read: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 7 Fech de eo i virgatam terrae [in Barbingi]}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 :}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 'and "Fech" [holds] 1 virgate from him [Ralph] [in Baveney]'. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lel }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
may be the result of a similar muddle or even a mangled form of Alwy; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 229; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 345 note 125. In Domesday Lincolnshire, personal names have likewise sometimes been mistaken for place-names; see LIN 4,19 "Summerlede" note, LIN 24,26 "Offran" note and LIN CN 28 "Schemin" note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THEY PAID TAX. The }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 main scribe of Great Domesday interlined }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 7 geld'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  above }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Maner'}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . He had failed to leave a space after the hidage, possibly because it was split into 1 hide and two lots of 1 virgate; see 1,5 hide note on the spaces he normally left there for phrases such as this. There was space above all 
three hidages for the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 7 geld'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , so the fact that he interlined it where he did may suggest that he only knew that the manor used to pay tax, but did not know the situation in 1086.}{
\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab WHEN "TURSTIN" OF WIGMORE ACQUIRED IT. Latin }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 recepit}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  means 'received' or 'acquired' and cannot normally be stretched to 'took' (Fleming, }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Domesday Book and the Law}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 226 no. 1333) in the sense of 'stole', for which }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 abstulit}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
 is routinely used in Domesday. With both "Turstin" and Earl William dead there was no need for euphemism. The issue here does not concern }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 recepit}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  but }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iunxit}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 : "Turstin" joined this estate to Cleobury Mortimer. Changes in the number and status of manors greatly concerned those involved in collecting and compiling material for the Domesday Enquiry.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab EARL WILLIAM. Earl William son of Osbern; see \{Introduction: History\}. In HEF 9,2 Earl William had given Downton-on-the-Rock to "Turstin" of Flanders (alias "Turstin" of Wigmore).}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 6,4\tab THIS ENTRY follows straight on from 6,3 with the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 7}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  before the 'Overs' hundred head li
nking it to the previous statement that (the lands in 6,3) were and are now assessed there (Cleobury Mortimer). There is no sign in the manuscript that this entry was added, as suggested by Lewis, 'Introduction', }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Shropshire Domesday}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 8.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [EARLS] DITTON 
... VALUED THERE. It formerly lay in Hopton Wafers Ancient Parish and for civil purposes is still in its successor Hopton Wafers (Civil) Parish. Ecclesiastically it now lies in Doddington Parish; see 4,3,70 Detton note. Though in 'Overs' Hundred in 1086, 
it had already been absorbed by Cleobury Mortimer and continued as a member of it; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 355; and 7,2 Ditton note. The affix 'Earls' dates from the time when the Mortimers became Earls of March.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab In the Penguin Alecto edition the place-name is wrongly printed as Earlsdition.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 6,5\tab LOWE. This is now part of Farlow Ecclesiastical Parish and Civil Parish, and was formerly in Stottesdon Ancient Parish. It lay in 'Conditre' Hundred in 1086, later in Stottesdon. Ralph }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
de la Lawe }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 1 fee in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 La Lawe }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from the barony of Ralph }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Mortuo Mari }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 963, while the same Richard holds 1 hide in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lawe }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from Roger }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Mortuo Mari }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 81a; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 108a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 232; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 236. }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 La Lowe }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is coupled with }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Neen Savage }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in Cleobury Mortimer Liberty in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 246.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab The main scribe of Great Domesday failed to rubricate the place-name}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  LAV}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  and also the hundred head }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 IN}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
CONDETRET H}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 UN}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 D}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 REDO}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ]; for other such failures, see 4,3,8 St Peter note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab RICHARD <OF BRAMPTON>. The several occurrences of a Richard holding under Ralph of Mortimer (4,11,3;14. 6,5-6;9;23-26) may refer to the same individual; see 6,23 Richard note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab THE CHURCH OF ST PETER [* OF SHREWSBURY *]. That is the Saxon church of Shrewsbury that was predecessor of Earl Roger's abbey. Its other early pre-Conquest possession was at Boreton (3b,5). See SHR 3b St Peter's note.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a third of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 6,6\tab NEEN [SAVAGE]. This holding and the other one for Neen Savage (6,7) were parts of the Ancient Parish of Ne
en Savage. They lay in 'Conditre' Hundred in 1086, then in Stottesdon Hundred and in the Liberty of Cleobury Mortimer. Together they form a block of 5 \'bd hides, but in 1255 (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, ii. p. 81a) only 2 \'bd hides are found, 3 parts in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Nene Savage}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 held by William }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Sancto Georg'}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and 1 part held by Geoffrey }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Ov'ton}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  from Roger }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Mortuo Mari }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 with service at Wigmore Castle. Part }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 of Neen Savage }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 was coupled with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 La Lowe }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Lowe 6,5) and part with }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Eudon }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Eudon (George): 4,11,5) in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 246
. Descent from Ingelrann was to Savage (4,11,12 Walton note) suggesting that 6,7 }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Nene }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
was certainly Neen Savage. But another part of Neen Savage and part at least of the other manor (called 'Nene Monell') went to Wigmore Abbey; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. l65a, 166b: }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. pp. 203, 211; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 230.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab RICHARD <OF BRAMPTON>. See 6,23 Richard note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a third of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 6,7\tab NEEN [SAVAGE]. See 6,6 Neen note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab INGELRANN <OF WALTON>. See 4,11,12 Ingelrann note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab HUNNING <OF LAWLEY>. See 4,3,56 Hunning note}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [VALUE ***]. Either the main scribe of Gre
at Domesday failed to include the value from the circuit volume or it was omitted there or the value was included in the other holding in Neen Savage (6,6). Compare 4,3,25 value note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 6,8\tab STEPPLE. This lay in the Ancient Parish of Neen Savage. It was in 'Conditre' Hundred in 1086, later in Stottesdon and in the Liberty of Cleobury Mortimer. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 963, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 La Steple }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 is among fees held of the barony of Ralph }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Mortuo Mari}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 108a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 232; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. no. 726; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 239.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Stepple Hall is at SO6678, Little Stepple at SO6577.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab GEOFFREY [* THE STEWARD *]. See 4,3,27 Geoffrey note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a third of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 6,9\tab KINLET. Domesday }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Chinlete}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  is}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 probably Old English }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 cyne-hliet }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ('royal portion'): Edith, the }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  holder, may be Queen Edith; see Ekwall, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Dictionary of English Placenames}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , under Kinlet; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 166. Kinlet was an Ancient Parish. It lay in 'Conditre' Hundred in 1086, later in Stottesdon Hundred and C
leobury Mortimer Liberty. The overlordship continued with the Mortimers, the undertenancy passing from Richard to the de Bromptons: in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 81b, Brian }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Brompton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds 5 hides in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Kynlet }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (one more than in Domesday) and one of these is held by Roger }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
de Foxcot'}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 all from Roger }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Mortuo Mari}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 963, 972; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 232, 246; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 291, vi. no. 247, x. no. 158. In }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. no. 235, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Kynlet }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
is coupled}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 with }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Foxcote }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Foxcote SO7181), while in vol. v. no. 130, a salt-spring in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Wyc' is }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 attached to the manor. This presumably was at Droitwich (see 4,1,25-26. 4,11,4), suggests an omission from Domesday (such rights were of great antiquity) and confirms that Kinlet was once royal land. }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Meton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Meaton and Little Meaton, SO7177, SO7078), held by Brian }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Brompton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. no. 235, with Pedwardine (6,24-26), was also probably part of Kinlet. The de Bromptons were benefactors of various churches. The church of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Kynlet }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 went to Wigmore Abbey (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , pp. 165a, 166a), while Brian and his brother Roger gave tithes in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Kinlet }{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Frenchcote }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Foxcote) to the Abbey of Lyre (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 1095 no.
 xxi) and 1 virgate in Kinlet to the Templars. On the whole manor, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 240.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Kinlet is represented by Kinlet Hall and Kinlet Home Farm (SO7081) and by the isolated church at SO7181.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab RICHARD <OF BRAMPTON>. On his being the same Richard as others of the same name holding under Ralph of Mortimer, see 6,23 Richard note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab [* QUEEN *] EDITH. See 6,2 Edith note and 6,9 Kinlet note. On the name Edith, see C13 Edith note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 4 HIDES. [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a space suitable for about four letters after }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iiii hid\'ea.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ; see 1,5 hide note.}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 6,10\tab [THE] SHEET. This was in the Ancient Parish of Ludford which had formerly been a chapelry of Bromfield Ancient Parish. The Sheet lay in "Culvestan" Hundred in 1086 and was later in Munslow Hundred (}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 70a) or 'Overs' Hundred (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iv. p. 234). Ingelrann's undertenancy went first to Savage (4,11,12 Walton note), then to }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Bosco}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 In }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 963, Philip }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Mortuomari }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 holds in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Sete }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Lecton' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Letton: 6,18) from Ralph }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Mortuo Mari}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 . Richard }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Boys }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
holds 2 hides in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Sete }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from Roger Mortimer in }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 70a; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 234; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 72.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab INGELRANN <OF WALTON>. See 4,11,12 Ingelrann note.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 6,11\tab 
MOST OF THE MANORS in Leintwardine Hundred in this fief (6,11-29) were drawn into the Mortimer Marcher lordship of Wigmore and ultimately emerged in Herefordshire. Some still paid occasional suit to Munslow hundred court in the late th
irteenth and early fourteenth centuries: SHR 6 Ralph note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab LEINTWARDINE. This was an Ancient Parish, now in Herefordshire. It had probably been a 5-hide manor in 1066, but by 1086 3 virgates were held by Picot (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 de Sai}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 )}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 from Earl Roger (4,20,20 Leintwardine note). Leintwardine had also probably been the royal }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 caput }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
of the hundred under Edward the Confessor and an important frontier manor: C10 Leintwardine note. It was gradually drawn into the Mortimer lordship of Wigmore, although was still said to be in Shropshire in 1304 (}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. no. 235); see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. no. 183, v. no. 133; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 321. The mill and church went to Wigmore Abbey: }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 329; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , p. 167a; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 iii. p. 202. Members of the manor were probably at: 
}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Moketree }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Mocktree SO4276; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , (old series) iii. p. 234; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , xi. pp. 300, 323); }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Turpleton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Trippleton SO4173; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{
\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. no.235); and perhaps also at }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Kynton }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 (Kinton SO4074; see }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 
, iv. no. 235; }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 244).
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab At the dissolution of these lordships in 1536, Leintwardine itself was placed in Herefordshire, though the Ancient Parish was divided between Herefordshire and Shropshire: \{Introduction: County Boundary\}.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab A CHURCH. A priest has already been mentioned. On the possibility that this was in fact the minster church for the territory of the royal manor of Leintwardine which became its hundred, see \{
Introduction: Ecclesiastical Organization\}.}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 6 STICKS OF EELS. That is, 150 eels at 25 eels to the stick.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 \tab 5 VILLAGERS AND 3 SMALLHOLDERS. Latin }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 uill' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 bord' }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 may extend to the accusative }{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 uillanos }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 bordarios }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 and thus be the objects of }{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 h}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 [}{
\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 abe}{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 ]}{\i\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 t }{\cf1\cgrid0\insrsid4139880 in the line above, like the slaves. }{\cf1\lang1036\langfe2057\cgrid0\langnp1036\insrsid4139880 
Compare 2,2 villagers note, 4,1,19 villagers note, 4,3,29 villagers note and 4,20,8 ploughmen note.}{\cgrid0\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 2 MEN PAY 4s FOR LEASING THE LAND. The Latin verb }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 locare }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
can mean both 'to let, lease' and 'to take on lease, hire, rent', confusingly referring to both sides of the transaction. It is thus often not clear which is the meaning. However, here the men must be paying 4s as a rent for some land.}{\insrsid4139880 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab See also Fleming, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday Book and the Law}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 226 no. 1334.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab WOODLAND. It is not clear whether the woodland details are part of the main holding here and are misplaced, or part of the 1 \'bd hides held by the man-at-ar
ms or even of the land rented by the 2 men. Compare 4,21,7 woodland note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 6,12\tab 'STANWAY'. A place, now lost, that lay in Winforton Ancient Parish, the bulk of which was in Herefordshire. It survived to be recorded on the first edition one-inch Ordnance Sur
vey map of 1832 (sheet 55, reprint sheet 50 of 1970). After 1086 it continued in the Mortimer barony, being given as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stanewey }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stanwye }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Placita de Quo Warranto}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 675, 681, among those manors whose suit had been withdrawn from Shropshire. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stanwey' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 w
as confirmed on Wigmore Abbey by Roger of Mortimer in 1249: Banks, 'Charters of the Abbey of Wigmore', p. 187. See also Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 325.
\par \tab \tab At the dissolution of the Marcher lordships in 1536, 'Stanway' was placed in Herefordshire: \{Introduction: County Boundary\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 6,13\tab ADFORTON. This was a township in Leintwardine Ancient Parish. It continued with the Mortimers, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Atfreton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 being found in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. no. 235 p. 160 (of Edmund }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Mortuo Mari}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ).}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 See }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Placita de Quo Warranto}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 681; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 iii. p. 204; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 332.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab At the dissolution of the Marcher lordships in 1536, Adforton was placed in Herefordshire: \{Introduction: County Boundary\}. Since 1866 Adforton has been a separate Civil Parish.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 6,14\tab LINGEN. This was an Ancient Parish. It continued to be held by the Mortimers and to make an occasional appearance at Munslow hundred court in Shropshire. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 963, John }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Lingaine }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds \'bd fee in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lingaine }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 of the barony of Ralph }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Mortuo Mari}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  
}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 while Ralph }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Lyngeyne }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds in Munslow Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 244; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 332. It was, however, effectively drawn into a Marcher lordship and at the dissolution of these lordships in 1536, Lingen was placed in Herefordshire: \{Introduction: County Boundary\}.
\par \tab \tab In an early grant (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Early Charters of the West Midlands}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , no. 405 p. 139, see pp. 203-212 = Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Anglo-Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, no. 1801) Coenred, King of the Mercians, gave 8 }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 manentes }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lingen }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (with }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Liya }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
interlined above) to the nun Feleburg. Feleburg later gave these to Milburga who founded Wenlock Priory (SHR 3c Wenlock note). It is possible that these 8 }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 manentes }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 are}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 represented in Domesday by the 5 hides in the various holdings at Lye (6,16 Lye note), by the 1 \'bd hides in Lingen and possibly by the l \'bd hides of 'Tumberland'}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(6,17 'Tumberland' note).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab "TURSTIN" <OF HUNTINGTON>. See 4,11,2 "Turstin" note. }{\insrsid4139880 His name was written by the }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 main scribe of Great Domesday over an erasure.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab GUNFRID. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Gunner}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; on the name, see 4,5,6 Gunfrid note. He is probably the same as Ralph of Mortimer's predecessor }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Gunuert }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
in HEF 9,1: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Herefordshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 275 note 73 (but he is not, as that note implies, the same as the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Gunuuar }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 wh
o held Brampton Bryan in 6,23, who is Gunnvarth; see 4,3,46 Gunnvarth note). He may also be the same man as the Gunfrid in 4,5,6.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab LATER 6s. The main scribe of Great Domesday corrected an original }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 iii}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  to }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 vi}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  by joining together the first two minims to form a }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 v}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 6,15\tab SHIRLEY. It lay in Aymestrey Ancient Parish. Aymestrey itself was in Herefordshire in 1086. The name appears rarely in later records but is found as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Shirlythe }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
held under the Mortimers in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. (old series) p. 239; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, xi. p. 332. It was effectively drawn into a Marcher lordship and at the dissolution of these lordships in 1536, Shirley was placed in Herefordshire: \{Introduction: County Boundary\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab "TURSTIN" <OF HUNTINGTON>. See 4,11,2 "Turstin" note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 6,16\tab LYE. The townships of Upper and Lower Lye lay in Aymestrey Ancient Parish. Aymestrey itself was in Herefordshire in 1086. In Domesday the land at Lye was divided among several tenants and was partl
y in Shropshire (if correctly identified) and partly in Herefordshire (HEF 1,10c. 9,8;14. 24,4. 31,7). Ralph of Mortimer also held \'bd hide in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lecwe }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
in "Hezetre" Hundred, in Herefordshire (HEF 9,8), and 57 acres of land and all the woodland in Gruffydd's manor of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lega }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(HEF 9,14. 31,7). The Shropshire lands of Ralph came into Marcher jurisdiction and were ultimately put into Herefordshire. The earliness of this change and the lack of records make it difficult to determine the boundary between the two counties 
at this point. If in 1086 the boundary lay along the River Lugg, then it may have turned northwards along the tributary that separates Lower from Upper Lye, keeping Upper Lye in Shropshire (like Lingen (6,15) which is not far away to the north-west). Ralp
h certainly held land at Lower Lye, probably the Domesday Herefordshire manor which is }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Netherlege }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 804, and in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 377 (Herefordshire); see the Herefordshire Domesday (Galbraith and Tait, p. 38 and p. 95 note). In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, iv. no. 235 (of Edmund of Mortimer) in Herefordshire, both }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Netherleye }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Overleye }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 are held from him by William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Leye }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 and Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Deverous }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 respectively, but the latter probably represents the manor of Lye held by Gruffydd in 
Herefordshire in 1086 (HEF 31,7). The exact identity of this Shropshire manor of Ralph thus requires further investigation. See Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 338; and 6,14 Lingen note.}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 190, suggests Lye in Bucknell (SO337758).
\par \tab \tab At the dissolution of the Marcher lordships in 1536, the parts of Lye that had been in Shropshire were placed in Herefordshire: \{Introduction: County Boundary\}.
\par \tab \tab On the possibility that land here was granted by King Coenred of Mercia to the nun Feleburg, see 3c,14 \'bd hide note and 6,14 Lingen note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 HIDE. [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a space suitable for about four letters after }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 i}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 hida.}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see 1,5 hide note.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining half a line after the hedged enclosures, perhaps for the later insertion of the woodland or other resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 6,17\tab 'TUMBERLAND'. Domesday}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Tumbelawe}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  was left unidentified for the Phillimore printed translation (1986),
 but was assumed to have lain, like the surrounding entries, in that part of Leintwardine Hundred that was later}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
incorporated in Herefordshire. Information from Mr J.W. Tonkin allowed it to be identified for the Alecto edition (1990). It appears to have me
rged with the manor of Letton in the sixteenth century and to have lain close to Letton Cottages (SO377701), forming part of Upper Letton Farm, where the field name 'Tumberlands' appears on the 1846 tithe map. It will therefore have been in part of the co
unty that was transferred to Herefordshire at the dissolution of the Marcher lordships in 1536. See Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 338; Thorn, 'Hundreds and Wapentakes', }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Shropshire Domesday}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 31; and 6,14 Lingen note.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 'Tumberland' will have lain in Leintwardine Ancient Parish and subsequently in Walford, Letton and Newton Civil Parish.
\par \tab \tab On the possibility that land here was granted by King Coenred of Mercia to the nun Feleburg, see 3c,14 \'bd hide note and 6,14 Lingen note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ALDRED [* BROTHER OF SIWARD *]. See 4,3,15 Aldred note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 6,18\tab LETTON. This was part of the township of Walford, Letton and Newton that was a member of Leintwardine Ancient Parish. This township became a separate Civil Parish in 1866.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab After 1086 Letton continued in the Mortimer barony. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lecton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is held with }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Sete }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (The Sheet 6,10) in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 963, from Ralph }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Mortuo Mari}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, (new series) iv. no. 235, (old series) iii. pp. 234, 239; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, xi. p. 334. It was effectively drawn into a Marcher lordship and at the dissolution of these lordships in 1536, it was placed in Herefordshire: \{Introduction: County Boundary\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab INGELRANN <OF WALTON>. See 4,11,12 Ingelrann note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab SIWARD [* THE FAT *]. This man may be Siward son of Aethelgar: 4,27,32 Siward note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 6,19\tab WALFORD. This lay in Leintwardine Ancient Parish. Of the two estates here, the land of St Mary's of Wigmore (6,19) continued to be held by Wigmore Abbey (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 165a; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 iii. p. 202), while the other portion (6,20) descended in the Mortimer barony. Nicholas }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Hintes }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Welle ford' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 963, while Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Pedewardyn }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
is the tenant in Munslow Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 244.
\par \tab \tab Walford was effectively drawn into a Marcher lordship in the Middle Ages and at the dissolution of these lordships in 1536, it was placed in Herefordshire: \{Introduction: County Boundary\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab HIDE. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 hida}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  over an erasure; as he had to write quite small in order to fit it in, he may have originally written }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 v'}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880  (= }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 virgata}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ) here.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a quarter of a line after the population, perhaps for the later insertion of a resource; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 6,20\tab WALFORD. On the manor, see 6,19 Walford note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab INGELRANN <OF WALTON>. See 4,11,12 Ingelrann note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab BLAECMER. The Domesday form }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Blachemer }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 represents the hypothetical Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bl\'e6cm\'e6r}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 203. Elsewhere JRM preferred the second element -mer for the Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 -m\'e6r}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
. The Phillimore printed edition has Blaecmaer; the Alecto edition has Bl\'e6cm\'e6r (but Bl\'e6r in the Penguin translation, in error). This is the only occurrence of this name in Domesday Book.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 6,21\tab BUCKTON. Buckton was a township of Bucknell Ancient Parish but since 1866 has been in Buckton and Coxall Civil Parish in Herefordshire. Buckton and Coxall also originated as a township of Bucknell Ancient Paris
h. The manor was later held under Mortimer by the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Brompton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 family:}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 291, iv. no. 247 (of Brian }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Brompton}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ),}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and iv. no. 235 (of Edmund }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Mortuo Mari}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ).}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
See also Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 331; and 6,24 Pedwardine note.
\par \tab \tab After 1086 Buckton was effectively drawn into a Marcher lordship and at the dissolution of these lordships in 1536, it was placed in Herefordshire: \{Introduction: County Boundary\}.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab OIDELARD [* THE STEWARD *]. }{\insrsid4139880 The Domesday forms of this 1086 tenant are }{\i\insrsid4139880 Oilard}{\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\insrsid4139880 us}{\insrsid4139880 ] in Huntingdonshire, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Oidelard}{
\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\insrsid4139880 us}{\insrsid4139880 ] in other counties, and are accepted by Forssner, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Continental-Germanic Personal Names in England}{\insrsid4139880 , p. 195, as representing Old German }{\i\insrsid4139880 
Odalhard}{\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\insrsid4139880  Odel}{\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\insrsid4139880 h}{\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\insrsid4139880 ard}{\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\insrsid4139880  Odilard }{\insrsid4139880 
etc. with loss of the dental in the Huntingdonshire form. However, an Old French form, not given by him, is more likely; the Domesday forms suggest it was }{\i\insrsid4139880 Oidelard}{\insrsid4139880 
, with characteristic Old French differentiation of the initial long vowel. In the Phillimore
 printed edition the forms Odelard and Odilard appear and these have now been standardized as Oidelard. The Alecto edition has Oilard for the Huntingdonshire tenants and Oidelard for the rest.
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Oidelard was a tenant of Ralph of Mortimer in Shropshire and elsewhere, including Downton-on-the-Rock in Herefordshire (HEF 9,2). He was perhaps his steward: Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 312.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 5 HIDES. [***].The main scribe of Great Domesday left a gap suitable for about four letters after }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 v hide.}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 see 1,5 hide note.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 6,22\tab [LLANFAIR] WATERDINE. This was a township of Clun Ancient Parish, then, from 1866, a separate Civil Parish. The place-name form (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Watredene}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 and the hundred (Leintwardine) identify this place, but no early medieval reference to the manor has been found; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, xi. p. 339. It may have been absorbed by the barony of Clun; certainly the church (the Llanfair or Mary Church) was subject to St George's Church of Clun, then to Wenlock Abbey; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Place-Names of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 178; 4,20 Picot note; 4,20,27 Selley note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 6,23\tab BRAMPTON [BRYAN]. This was an Ancient Parish. From Richard the subtenancy passed to a family named from the place. Brian }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Bromton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds 1 fee in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Bromton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 963, of the barony of Ralph }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Mortuo Mari}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 while it is }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Brianes Brompton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in Munslow Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 244; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, iii. nos. 291, 395, v. no. 130; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 327; and 4,20,18 Leintwardine note.
\par \tab \tab After 1086 Brampton Bryan was effectively drawn into a Marcher lordship and at the dissolution of these lordships in 1536, it was placed in Herefordshire: \{Introduction: County Boundary\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab RICHARD <OF BRAMPTON>. The several occurrence
s of a Richard holding under Ralph of Mortimer (4,11,3;14. 6,5-6;9;23-26) may refer to the same individual. His holding here went to the de Brampton family (6,23 Brampton note), of which he might be an ancestor; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 240; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 368 (though she calls him a tenant of Roger de Mortemer, not Ralph).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab GUNNVARTH. On this name, see 4,3,46 Gunnvarth note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 6,24\tab PEDWARDINE. This lay in the Ancient Parish of Brampton Bryan which was placed in Herefords
hire in 1536 at the dissolution of the Marcher lordships: 6,23 Brampton note. From Richard, the 1086 subtenant, this estate and the next two estates in Pedwardine (6,24-26) went to Brian }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Brompton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
and was held under his family by a family named from Pedwardine. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 246, Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Pedewardyn }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Pedewardyn }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 from Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Harleye }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in Munslow Hundred. It had formerly been held from Brian }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Bromton. }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 It is coupled with }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Meton }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Meaton; see 6,9 Kinlet note) in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. no. 235. See }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, iii. no. 395, vii. no. 387; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 329. There were once separate villages here: places called }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Parva Pedewardin }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Magna Pedewardin }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 are found in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Placita de Quo Warranto}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 675a.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab RICHARD <OF BRAMPTON>. On his being the same man as others of the same name holding under Ralph of Mortimer, see 6,23 Richard note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 6,25\tab PEDWARDINE. See 6,24 Pedwardine note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab RICHARD <OF BRAMPTON>. On his being the same man as others of the same name holding under Ralph of Mortimer, see 6,23 Richard note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 6,26\tab PEDWARDINE. See 6,24 Pedwardine note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab RICHARD <OF BRAMPTON>. On his being the same man as others of the same name holding under Ralph of Mortimer, see 6,23 Richard note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ARNGRIM <OF WOMERTON>. See 4,5,3 Arngrim note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 6,27\tab ADLEY. The two estates here (see also 6,28) are respectively Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Adelestune}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Edelactune}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 The place is now represented by Adley Moor and Adleymoor Common in Buckton and Coxa
ll Civil Parish, Herefordshire. Buckton and Coxall originated as a township of Bucknell Ancient Parish. The second entry (6,28) is a late insertion in the Mortimer schedule added after 6,32 which is itself an addition; see 6,28 entry note and 6,32 entry n
ote. Both entries appear to refer to a part of Adley (for another portion, see 4,20,26 Adley note). Adley was in Purslow Hundred in the Middle Ages. The Domesday forms appear difficult to reconcile (see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 346 note 132), but later examples show that this is not so. Adley subsequently became associated with Bucknell (6,29): in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, iv. no. 235 (of Edmund }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Mortuo Mari}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 1 knight's fee is held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bokenhull }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Adelahton }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 by Gilbert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Bockenhull }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and the Abbot 
of Wigmore. This holding by the Abbot of Wigmore may well be the unnamed land 'to the value of 20s' bought before 1185 by Hugh of Mortimer from Herbert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Castello }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
of Castle Holdgate (descendant of Helgot; see 4,21 Helgot note) and given to Wigmore Abbey. Certainly Wigmore Abbey had an estate in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Adelacton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in 1256 (Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}
{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 313): it is possibly the same estate that is called }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Colkeshale }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Coxall SO3774) in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 165a, which was confirmed as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Adlacton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 on the abbey; see Banks, 'Charters of the Abbey of Wigmore', p. 143; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 202 (}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Adlaghton}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ).}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 The Mortimers continued to hold other parts of Adley called }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Adelacton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Adelatton 
}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in 1292: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Placita de Quo Warranto}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 675a, 681b.
\par \tab \tab After 1086 Adley was effectively drawn into a Marcher lordship and at the dissolution of these lordships in 1536, it was placed in Herefordshire: \{Introduction: County Boundary\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab HELGOT <OF HOLDGATE>. See 4,11,1 Helgot note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab RAVENSWARD. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rauenesuard; }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Farley misprinted }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Reuenesuard}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
See 7,1 Saeward note and LIN C3 Burgwald note for other cases of Farley misprinting }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 e }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 for manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 a }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 as the second letter of a personal name.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 6,28\tab THIS UNRUBRICATED ENTRY was a late addition by the main scribe of Great Dom
esday in the space he had left at the end of this fief and after the added entry for Sheinton (6,32). It was written in pale ink and at the same time as all the unrubricated added entries in Shropshire and as some in other circuits; see 3c,14 entry note. 
I
t was directed by transposition signs (not shown by Farley) to its proper place after another holding in Adley earlier in the column; it therefore did not need a hundred head. The scribe was careful to use different designs for the two pairs of transposit
ion signs so that the two added entries here (6,28;32) were directed to their correct positions in chapter 6.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ADLEY. See 6,27 Adley note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 6,29\tab BUCKNELL. This was an Ancient Parish. The parish was formerly divided between Herefordshire (the township of Buck
ton and Coxall) and Shropshire. Since the transfer of that township to Herefordshire (where it became a separate Civil Parish) in 1894, Bucknell has been entirely in Shropshire. The advowson of the church went to Wigmore Abbey (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 167a; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 iii. p. 205) while the manor descended in the Mortimer fief. In }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 235 (of Edmund }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Mortuo Mari}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ),}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 one knight's fee is held by Gilbert }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Bokenhull }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bokenhull }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Adelahton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Adley: 6,27 Adley note). See Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 318; and 4,20,26 Adley note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab HELGOT <OF HOLDGATE>. See 4,11,1 Helgot note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 2 HIDES [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a space suitable for about four letters has been left after }{\i\f703\cf1\insrsid4139880 hid\'ea}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see 1,5 hide note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 6,30\tab 
PULLEY. Because Ralph of Mortimer held Meole Brace (6,33) it is likely that this part of Pulley, which lay in Condover Hundred like the other (4,27,6), is the portion that was taken into the Ancient Parish of Meole Brace and s
o later into the Liberty of Shrewsbury. It lost its separate identity and became a member of Meole Brace: Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, vi. pp. 206, 212 on. Pulley was otherwise in the Ancient Parish of Shrewsbury St Julian.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 HIDE \'85 5 PLOUGHS. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote almost all of the second line of this entry (up to }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 sunt}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 before the 3 riders) over an erasure; perhaps as a result it is in darker ink.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 [* QUEEN *] EDITH. See 6,2 Edith note. On the name Edith, see C13 Edith note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 7 PLOUGHS. The main scribe of Great Domesday originally wrote }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 iiii}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  with }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 or}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (for }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 quattuor}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 )}
{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 interlined; he then corrected it by turning the first two minims into a }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 v }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in darker ink, but he failed to erase the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 or}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 . This makes the ploughs actually on the land exceed the estimate by two, the only instance of this in Shropshire (but see 4,19,13 ploughs note and 7,4 servants note).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank a quarter of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 6,31\tab EDGEBOLD. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Edbaldinesham}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
This lay in the Ancient Parish of Great Hanwood. It was in Condover Hundred in 1086, but seems soon to have become a member of Meole Brace (6,33) and so been taken into the Liberty of Shrewsbury: in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 17 (of George }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Cantilupo}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ),}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Melesbracy }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 receives rent from the lord of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Egbaldenham}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 214.
\par \tab \tab The Domesday estate is represented by Upper Edgebold (SJ4511), Lower Edgebold (SJ4510) and Mount Edgebold (SJ4510).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [* QUEEN *] EDITH. See 6,2 Edith note; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 350. On the name Edith, see C13 Edith note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 1 FREE MAN WHO PAYS 8s IN REVENUE. In view of the lack of a 1086 value for this manor, it is likely that it was being held for a money rent by the free man; on the system of 'farming', see 3d,5 revenue note.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 6,32\tab THIS UNRUBRICATED ENTRY was a late addition
 by the main scribe of Great Domesday in the space left by him at the end of this fief. It was done in the same campaign as all the unrubricated added entries in Shropshire and as some in other circuits; see 3c,14 entry note. It was directed by transposit
i
on signs to its correct place with other holdings in Condover Hundred earlier in the column; it did not therefore need a hundred head. See 6,28 entry note. Farley printed the transposition signs as crosses with dots in each corner, not as they appear in t
h
e manuscript. This entry is a shorter version of an entry already recorded at 4,11,1 where Ralph of Mortimer is said to be a subtenant of Earl Roger in Sheinton; in both Helgot holds from Ralph. There are several occurrences in Domesday Book of an entry a
p
pearing twice, not always because one is an addition, where an estate was held by a tenant-in-chief in one but by the same man as the subtenant in the other entry. For other duplicate added entries in Shropshire, see 4,1,34 and 4,12,1 and, perhaps, 7,2. T
he differences between 4,11,1 and this entry might suggest different sources.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab SHEINTON. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Condover Hundred in 1086. This entry is a duplicate of that at 4,11,1 (see 4,11,1 Sheinton note), though the details are slightly less full.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab HELGOT}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 <OF HOLDGATE>. See 4,11,1 Helgot note. For the descent of part of Sheinton to the lords of Castle Holdgate, see 4,11,1 Sheinton note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab AZUR. On this name, see 4,1,35 Azur note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab SAEWULF <OF SHEINTON>. See 4,11,1 Saewulf note. On the loss of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 f }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Saul }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 here (he appears as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Saulf }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 in the duplicate at 4,11,1), see von Feilitzen, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , \'a7 94.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab WOODLAND, 100 PIGS. That is, woodland sufficient for fattening 100 pigs, as can be
\par \tab seen in the duplicate at 4,11,1.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 6,33\tab THIS ENTRY may also have been added at the end of chapter 6. Although the ink is not quite as pale as the succeeding added entries (see 6,28 entry note and 6,32 entry note), it is still paler than that in 6,31 and the 
writing is slightly smaller. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 MELAM }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is not rubricated, though the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 I }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Isd' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
and the hundred head are, probably an oversight; for other failures in rubrication, see 4,3,8 St Peter note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab MEOLE [BRACE]. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Shrewsbury Hundred in 1086, later in Shrewsbury Liberty and probably absorbed the adjacent Mortimer vills of Pulley and Edgebold as well. William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
de Cantelupo }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds 1 fee in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Meeles }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 963, of the barony of Ralph }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Mortuomari}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 while in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 240 (in Shrewsbury Liberty), William }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de la Souche de Harygworthe }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
and Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Bracy de Meole }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 hold }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Meole Bracy}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, ii. no. 17, vi. no. 235, x. no. 42. One virgate of the manor was held by St Mary's of Shrewsbury in 1086 (3d,3) and the 3 hides of the manor are counted in the 100 hides of Shrewsbury in C13. The church went to the Abbey of Wigmore: }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 165a, 167a; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 iii. p. 203. On the whole manor, see Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 350.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [* QUEEN *] EDITH. See 6,2 Edith note; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 350. On the name Edith, see C13 Edith note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab BURGESSES IN THE CITY. That is, in Shrewsbury.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 7\tab LAND OF ROGER OF LACY. He was son and heir of Walter of Lacy (died 1085) and his wife Ermelina (Emma). They originated from }{\insrsid4139880 Lassy, }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in the French d\'e9partement of }{\insrsid4139880 
Calvados (arrondissement Vire, canton Cond\'e9-sur-Noireau). Roger's brother, Hugh of Lacy, and his nephew, Ilbert of Lacy, were both Domesday tenants-in-chief. }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Roge
r himself was a tenant-in-chief and also held lands under Earl Roger (SHR 4,8). Both groups became part of the Lacy barony whose }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 caput }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
was Weobley in Herefordshire and whose chief Shropshire manor was Stanton Lacy (SHR 7,4). }{\insrsid4139880 As a supporter of Robert Curtho
se against William II, he rebelled in 1088 and in 1094, lost his English lands and was banished. He returned to Normandy where he served Robert until his fall in 1106. }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
His forfeited lands passed to his brother, Hugh, then to Roger's son, Gilbert of Lacy, descending in the Lacy family until the death of another Walter of Lacy in 1241.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab None of the estates in this chapter nor those in SHR 5-6, 8-9 lay north of Shrewsbury and with only a few exceptions all are found in the southernmost hundreds of Leintwardin
e, "Culvestan", 'Overs' and 'Conditre': SHR 5 Osbern note. Roger's manors were held }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 T.R.E.}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 either by a Siward or an Aldred, assuming that Saeward in 7,1 is an error for Siward. There were a Siward and an Aldred who were brothers and sons of Aethelgar. They
 were related to Edric Streona, King Edward and Edric the wild (4,1,14 Edric note and 4,27,32 Siward note). It is possible that these are the individuals whose lands Roger acquired. However, the description of Siward and Aldred as 'free men' may count aga
inst this, as Siward son of Aethelgar was described in HEF 1,41 as a relative of King Edward, and it would be normal to describe an important Siward simply as 'Siward' unless the main scribe of Great Domesday was ignorant of his status.}{\insrsid8798677 

\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab The hundredal order of this chapter is as follows:
\par \tab \tab 7,1 ["Alnodestreu"] Hundred
\par \tab \tab (7,2 ['Overs'] Hundred)
\par \tab \tab 7,3 'Conditre' Hundred}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 7,4-6 "Culvestan" Hundred.
\par \tab At 7,1 Domesday has an erroneous Baschurch hundred head. The entry for Earls Ditton (7,2) is very probably a duplicate of 6,4; see 7,2 entry note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 7,1\tab IN BASCHURCH HUNDRED. [* IN "ALNODESTREU" HUNDRED *]. The Baschurch hundred head is probably an error for "Alnodestreu" (as in 4,9,1 and 4,11,5), there being no clear reason why Cleobury North should have been a detach
ment of a northern hundred. Moreover, it is only in the southernmost hundreds of Shropshire that lay tenants hold directly from the king (SHR 7 Roger note); elsewhere they hold under Earl Roger. "Alnodestreu" is probably the correct hundred. The cause of 
these errors is very probably that the main scribe of Great Domesday mechanically inserted the name of the next hundred in the standard sequence, even though the fief-holder had no estates there: \{Introduction: Hundreds\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ROGER OF LACY HOLDS ... FROM THE KING. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 ROGERIUS De Laci ten' de rege}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 was written by the main scribe of Great Domesday over an erasure. He probably wrote the wrong tenant-in-chief here, presumably one occupying less space as he had to write the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 R}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
ROGERIUS}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  in the outer margin because of lack of space.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab CLEOBURY [NORTH]. This was an Ancient Parish. It probably lay in "Alnodestreu" Hundred in 1086, and was later in Stottesdon Hundred. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Uferecleobyrig }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(Over Cleobury), like Hopton Wafers (7,3), had been held by Worcester Church but was removed from it by Earl Swein (Hemming's Cartulary: Hearne, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hemingi Chartularium}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 276: folio 129r). Swein was Swein Godwinson, Earl of the West Midlands 1043-1051. It is possible that this was a former comital estate: Williams, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 The English and the Norman Conquest}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 93.
\par \tab \tab The Lacy interest in the manor did not continue after 1086; instead it passed to Bernard }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Neufmarch\'e9 }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (founder of Brecon Priory) and to the honour of Brecknock. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 218 (Stottesdon Hundred) Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Halston }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Cleyburi North }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Mortuo Mari}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 honour of Brecknock, and Roger holds from the Earl of Hereford. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 81b, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Northcleyburi}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , 2 hides, is held in two portions, one of the holders being Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wafre }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 who named Hopton Wafers (7,3). The King of Almain (4,21 Helgot note) also held part of the manor for a time (}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 108a) and gave it to the Templars who withdrew suit to Castle Holdgate; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 231; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. no. 446, ii. nos. 473, 474, 808, iii. no. 629, iv. no. 198; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 21. The church was given to Brecon Priory: }
{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 264 no. ii.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\scaps\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab SAEWARD [* SIWARD THE FAT *]. }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Sauuard'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Farley misprinted }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Seuuard'
}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; compare 6,27 Ravensward note. However, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Sauuard' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 may be a scribal error for }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Siuuard' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
as a 'Siward' was Roger's predecessor in three out of the six manors he held in this chapter; on his being the son of Aetgelgar, see SHR 7 Roger note. Compare 4,3,3 Saeward note and 5,2 Saeward note. See SHR 7 Roger note. The Alecto edition has Siward.

\par \tab \tab On his possible identification as Siward the fat, see 4,27,32 Siward note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining three-quarters of a line after the mill detail, perhaps for the later insertion of the woodland or other resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 7,2\tab THIS UNRUBRICATED ENTRY was a 
late addition by the main scribe of Great Domesday, written in the foot margin and slightly into the outer margin; it interrupts the account of Roger of Lacy's manor of Stanton Lacy (7,4). It was written in pale ink in the same campaign as all the unrubri
cated added entries in Shropshire and as some in other circuits; see 3c,14 entry note. There are no transposition signs, but the assumption has long been that it belongs with 7,1 Cleobury North. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 347 (following Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. p. 23), tentatively identified }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Dodentone}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  as part of Ditton Priors, which is the nearest }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Dodentone}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  to Cleobury North, called 'Priors' from the main holding there (4,1,26) which went to Wenlock Priory.}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 However, the coincidence of two places cal
led 'Cleobury' (Cleobury Mortimer in 6,2 and Cleobury North in 7,1) both having 1-hide holdings in places called }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Dodentone}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 attached to them was noted as strange in the Phillimore printed edition. A confusion in the text was also suggested there, though the identification of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Dodentone}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 in 7,2 was kept as Ditton Priors, albeit questioned, and 'Cleobury' as Cleobury North. However, since the publication of that edition in 1986 our work on the corrections and additions made to Great Domesday Book now suggests st
rongly that this entry is a duplicate of the one at 6,2, as are so many other added entries, especially those written at a late stage after rubrication of the county had taken place (see 4,1,34 entry note). It would seem likely that during a check the mai
n scribe of Great Domesday found an entry for }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Dodentone}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  linked to }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Claiberie}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , perhaps with the tenant abbreviated to }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 R.}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 . If he had looked through what he had written he might have seen the entry for }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Cleberie}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  in Roger of Lacy's fief (7,1) with no mention of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Dodentone}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880  in it, so he added it below in the nearest space. He may have failed to see Ralph of Mortimer's holding in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Claiberie}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (6,2) or, more probably, did not find the detail on }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Dodentone}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  which was tucked away at the end of the next entry (6,3) as 6,4. How
ever, in view of the number of added entries that are duplicates, he may not have checked what he had already written. His omission of the 'Overs' hundred head (which was in the entry at 6,4) may suggest a different source for this added entry and may hav
e contributed to his error in duplication. We do not accept the suggestion by Lewis ('Introduction', }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Shropshire Domesday}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 8) that this addition corrected the detail in 6,4 and he errs in thinking that the duplicate entry had not been noticed before, as this point was mentioned in the Phillimore printed edition note to 7,2.
\par \tab \tab The Penguin Alecto edition prints this entry in the middle of the entry for Stanton Long; see 4,14,28 entry note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [IN 'OVERS' HUNDRED]. This heading is supplied from the one at 6,4 on the ground that the present entry for }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Dodentone}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  is a duplicate of that one: 7,2 entry note.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [EARLS] DITTON?. For the suggested identification of this }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Dodentone}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  with Earls Ditton, rather than with Ditton Priors, suggested in the Phillimore printed editio
n, see 7,2 entry note. It was identified as ?Earlsditton in the Alecto edition; see Thorn, 'Hundreds and Wapentakes', }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Shropshire Domesday}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 31 note 3. Earls Ditton lay in the Ancient Parish of Cleobury Mortimer.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab CLEOBURY [NORTH?]. The main scribe of Great Domesday implied by his positioning of this added entry that this }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Claiberie}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 was Cleobury North (7,1), but if, as suggested here (7,2 entry note), this is a duplicate entry for material already included in 6,4, then it is Cleobury Mortimer (6,1). The Alecto edition has Cleobury ?North; see Thorn, 'Hundreds and Wapentakes', }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Shropshire Domesday}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 31 note 3.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab IT IS. For }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 est}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  ('is') the main scribe of Great Domesday interlined the abbreviation mark resembling the divi
sion sign; he used this abbreviation sign occasionally elsewhere in Great Domesday in place of }{\i\f710\cf1\insrsid4139880 \'e7}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 7,3\tab HOPTON [WAFERS]. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in 'Conditre' Hundred in 1086, and was later in Stottesdon Hundred. Like Cleobury North (7,1) it was claimed as Worcester Church land (Hemming's Cartulary; Hearne, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hemingi Chartularium}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 276: folio 129r,) that had been alienated by Earl Swein. Swein was Swein Godwinson, Earl of the West Midlands 1043-1051. It is possible that this was a former comital estate: Williams, }
{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 The English and the Norman Conquest}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 93.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Also like Cleobury North, it descended to the honour of Brecknock: in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 81a, Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 le Wafre }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds}{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 hides in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hopton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from the Earl of Hereford of the honour of Brecknock. It is }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hopton Waffre }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 217, and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Upton Wafre }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 231; see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 183. The church went to Brecon Priory: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 165b.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab SIWARD [* THE FAT *]. On this Siward being the son of Aethelgar, see SHR 7 Roger note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 7,4\tab STANTON [LACY]. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in "Culvestan" Hundred in 1086, then in Munslow Hundred, although the Lacys claimed it as a Liberty and it is surveyed in the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880  as a single complex manor, not attached to any hundred. It continued in the Lacy fief as their principal Shropshire manor: in the late thirteenth century it was held by Geoffrey }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Geneville }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (married to Maud }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Lacy}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and then by their heirs. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 106b, Geoffrey }
{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Gemull' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stanton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in chief by barony from the king. It is }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stanton Lacy }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 43, and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stanton juxta Lodelawe }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 228; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 72b, 80b; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. no. 344, x. nos. 307, 640. The 20-hide manor had a number of members. Among them were:
\par \tab \tab }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Dounton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Downton SO5279) held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 224, by Gilbert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Lacy }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from Peter }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Genevill}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ;
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Hopton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Hopton Cangeford SO5480) held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 964, 972, of the barony of Walter }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Lasey }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
by Nicholas }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Hopton'}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Hopton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hopton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from Peter }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Genevill }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 224, and Theobald }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Verdon }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is overlord }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 of Hopton Kandivant 
}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. no. 54; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. no. 611, vii. no. 710, x. no. 637; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 245;
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Heyton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Upper and Lower Hayton, SO5181, SO5080), two villages, held from the barony of Walter }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Lasey }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 pp. 964, 973, called }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Heyton Inferior }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Heyton Superior }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids
}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 224, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Neothere Heyton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Overheyton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, viii. no. 111, vi, no. 54, vii, no. 710; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. no. 230; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 245;
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Pole }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Pools farm SO4879) held by }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 John Piron }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 of Walter }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Lasey's }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 barony in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 pp. 964, 972; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 225, 245; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 80b;

\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Wigeleg' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Wigley SO5276), 2 virgates, held by Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Dovile }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 80b; see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. no. 54, vii. no. 710;
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Wodeton' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Wootton SO4578) held by Thomas }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Grete }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from Peter }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Genevill }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 224; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 963, 972; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 245; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 80b; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iii. no. 194;
\par }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Akes }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Rock? SO5275, so Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 25), 1 virgate, held by Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Stanton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
from Margery }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Lacy }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and 8 virgates held by gift of Walter of Lacy in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 80b; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 69b;
\par \tab \tab possibly }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Coldeweston }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Cold Weston SO5583) held by Philip }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Baggesore }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 of Lawrence }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Lodelowe }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. no. 808.
\par \tab \tab It is likely that the origin of the town of Ludlow (SO5174) is to be found in this Lacy holding. The Lacys had their castle there and a continuing interest in the town; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 148; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. pp. 68b-69b, 98b-100a; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 228; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, ii. no. 78, iii. no. 43, v. no. 187, vi. no. 54, vii. no. 710, viii. no. 469, ix. nos. 379, 642, x. no. 307; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 234. Eyton was, however, misled by identifying the }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lude }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 of HEF 24,11 with Ludlow; it is Lyde. On the castle, dated }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 . 1090, see King, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Castellarium Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 426.

\par \tab \tab The church of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stantone Lacy }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 was held in 1291 by the prior of Llanthony Prima: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 166b.
\par \tab \tab On the whole manor, see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. pp. 4-26.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab SIWARD [* THE FAT *]. On this Siward being the son of Aethelgar, see SHR 7 Roger note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab A CHURCH. With its 1\'bd hides of land and its two priests, this was clearly a 'superior' church; see \{Introduction: Ecclesiastical Organization\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ST PETER'S OF HEREFORD. }{\insrsid4139880 A college of secular canons (who are mentioned in Domesday) founded before 1084 by Walter of Lacy, father of the Domesday holder, Roger of Lacy. Walter of Lacy }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
granted to it (the services of) 1 villager from each of 10 of his estates in Shropshire, Herefordshire and Gloucestershire, including Stanton and Stokesay (SHR 7,4-5). }{\insrsid4139880 The college was granted by Hugh of Lacy (Walter\rquote 
s son to whom Roger's estates passed on his forfeiture) to Gloucester Abbey in 1101, as a dependent priory. It was amalgamated with St Guthlac\rquote s church in 1143. See }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 547 no. xiii; }{\insrsid4139880 Gloucester History (Hart,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 i. pp. 85, 123); Knowles and Hadcock, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Medieval Religious Houses}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 54, 67.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab RICHARD [* OF STANTON *]. He may be the Richard }{\i\insrsid4139880 de stantuna}{\insrsid4139880 
, one of Roger 's men, who was a witness to the grant by Bishop Robert of Hereford to Roger of Lacy of land in Onibury (2,2) and in Holme Lacy (HEF 2,12): Galbraith, 'An Episcopal Land-Grant of 1085', p. 360. See 2,2 Lacy note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\insrsid4139880 \tab ASCELIN. The Domesday forms of this name - }{\i\insrsid4139880 Azelin}{\insrsid4139880 (}{\i\insrsid4139880 us}{\insrsid4139880 ) and (once) }{\i\insrsid4139880 Aselinus}{\insrsid4139880  - represent Old German }{\i\insrsid4139880 
Azelin}{\insrsid4139880 , Old French }{\i\insrsid4139880 Ascelin}{\insrsid4139880 : Forssner, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Continental-Germanic Personal Names in England}{\insrsid4139880 
, pp. 38-39. The Old French form seems more likely, despite the predominance of
 -z- in the Domesday forms. In the Phillimore printed translations both Ascelin and Azelin occur, but here they have been standardized as Ascelin. The Alecto edition has Azelin.
\par \tab \tab Despite Keats-Rohan, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\insrsid4139880 , p. 159, this tenant of Roger of Lacy is unlikely to be the same person as the tenant of Earl Roger in Staffordshire; see STS 8,14 Ascelin note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 2 HALF-VILLAGERS ... A HALF-VILLAGER. On the two meanings of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 dimidius uillanus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , see 2,2 half note.}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 It is poss
ible that as Roger of Lacy was subtenant in Onibury (2,2) and tenant-in-chief here and as the two manors were fairly close and these half-villagers were in sub-holdings of them which were perhaps even closer together, the other 'halves' of these villagers
 were three of the six half-villagers recorded in 2,2; in other words, that these half-villagers owed services in both holdings, rather than that they held only half the normal holding of a villager here.
\par \tab \tab There may be another link between this entry and 2
,2: the unusual (for Shropshire) reference to Cottagers (the only other Cottager being in 7,6, another Lacy land). However, it is possible that the person making the Lacy return for these three manors called a }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 cozet }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 what someone else might have called a }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 bordarius }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 or }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 cotarius}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see 2,2 Cottager note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 4 SERVANTS ... OF LAND. This is a confused statement. It may mean that the servants had 1 furlong ('ferling', see next note) and 10 acres of the manor of Stanton Lacy and that the estimate is for 3 ploughs (thou
gh in fact they have 4 ploughs actually working): so }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , i. p. 282 note 16. Or it is possible that the 'land for 3 ploughs' means the same as '3 carucates of land': in Exon}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  
}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and the corresponding Great Domesday entries for the south-west countie
s the phrases were often interchangeable (DEV 1,2 carucates note). This view is lent support both by the word order, by the fact that 4 ploughs seem too many to work the small area represented by 1 furlong and 10 acres, and by the fact that 'land for 2 
\'bd ploughs' in the next sentence must mean '2 \'bd carucates'. However, a mixture of the two forms of measurement, carucates and hides (or their fractions), is unusual. See 4,1,15 ploughs note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab FURLONG. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 ferling }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is from Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 feorthling}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  feorthing }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
('a fourth', 'a quarter'). In HUN B1;7;9-12 the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 ferling }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is a quarter in the sense of 'a ward or precinct' in a town; in KEN 5,188 a mill in Dover pays 48 measures (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 ferlingels}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 of corn; elsewhere in Domesday the word is used as a term of measurement of extent, that is a quarter of a virgate. 'Ferling' appears in the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Oxford English Dictionary}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  (though now only in historical use and with a reference to farthing) and the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday Geography of South-West England}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 uses the words ferlings, ferdings and fertings, but John Morris decided to translate it as 'furlong' (like the furlong or 'furrow-length', Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 quarentena}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
a twelfth of a league, which was used to measure woodland, pasture etc.). The 'ferling' appears regularly in both Exon}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and Great Domesday for Devon
, Somerset and Cornwall in the record of tax assessment of the manor and of the lordship and villagers' holding there; it is used here as a fiscal measurement, like the acres (see 7,4 acres note).}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 10 ACRES OF LAND. For the only other reference to the geld-acre in Domesday Shropshire, see 4,17,2 and 4,17,2 acres note. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 VCH Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, i. p. 283 note 17, disagrees, believing this to be a 'field acre', but the acre was also combined with the 'ferling' (7,4 furlong note) in the assessment of tax in Domesday Dev
on (DEV 6,6 furlongs note). If one assumes that the 10 acres here were less than a 'ferling', then there would be more than 120 acres to a hide (in a 120-acre hide 7 \'bd
 acres form a 'ferling'), but the existence of the 10 acres was originally briefly overlooked and the scribe may have been unwilling to alter the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 un' ferling }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 to }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 ii ferlings }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (and put 2 \'bd acres). It is also possible that the 10 acres formed a separate holding of one or more of the servants and this was the reason why the scribe at first omitted it. The addition of }{\i\f703\cf1\insrsid4139880 
7 x. ac's t'r\'ea }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 was an early one because there is no change in ink colour; the transposition signs are as in the translation, not as Farley printed them.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 3 RIDING MEN. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 radchen}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 istres}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ] are}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 probably identical to }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
radmans }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ('riders': 2,1 riders note). This is the only occurrence of the term }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 radchenistre }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
in Domesday Shropshire, though it is common further to the south in Herefordshire, Gloucestershire and Worcestershire.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab AUTI }{\insrsid4139880 <OF LEEBOTWOOD>. See 4,5,3 Auti note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 7,5\tab STOKESAY. This w
as an Ancient Parish. It lay in "Culvestan" Hundred in 1086, later in Munslow Hundred and in the Lacy Liberty of Stanton Lacy. Roger held another 'Stoke' ('North Stoke' or Stoke-on-Tern) under Earl Roger: 4,8,7 Stoke note. Stokesay continued in the Lacy b
arony with the de Say family as undertenants for a period. It seems probable that Roger of Lacy enfeoffed his tenant William of Sai (4,8,1-2; see 4,8,1 William note) here some time after 1086. In the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 964, 973, Walter }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Say }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds three fees of the barony of Walter }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Lasey }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Nortstok}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
' (Stoke-on-Tern: 4,8,7), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Sotstok' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wethul }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Wheathill: 4,8,16). In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 70a, John }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Verdun }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds 5 hides in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stok' Say}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Wetlinton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Whettleton SO4482) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Neuton }{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Newton SO4482) from the heirs of Walter of }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lascy}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 while Laurence }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Lodelowe }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Stoke Say }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from John }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Grey }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 who holds from Theobald }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Verdon }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 223; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 80b; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 244; }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. nos. 52, 54, vii. no. 710, x. nos. 115, 637; and 7,4 St Peter's note. The church of Stokesay was given to Haughmond Abbey and}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 some land at }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Newton juxta Stoke Say}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Stokesey }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Weltylton}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Taxatio Ecclesiastica}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 163b, 166b;}{\insrsid4139880  }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Valor Ecclesiasticus}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 iii. p. 192; the Haughmond Cartulary (Rees,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 nos. 238, 821-30, 1154-55, 1168, 1284-86); }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. pp. 113-14 no. xiv. On the whole manor, see Eyton,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 29.}{\insrsid4139880 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab A castle had been established here by the thirteenth century; see King, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Castellarium Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 430.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ALDRED [* BROTHER OF SIWARD *]. See SHR 7 Roger note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab VILLAGERS ... COTTAGERS. [***]. It is unclear from the Latin whether the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 erant }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in the previous line also governs the villagers and cottagers.
 After them the main scribe of Great Domesday left the rest of the line blank (space for about a dozen letters), possibly for further details of the population.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab MILL WHICH PAYS. Or possibly 'which paid' if all the details of this manor refer to the past, like the lordship ploughs. Although }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 redd' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (like }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 geld'}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 ; see 3c,2 paid tax note) can be extended to the past }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 reddebat}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 as well as to the present }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 reddit}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,
}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 one would nave expected a phrase such as }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 T.R.E. }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in this instance as the details usually refer to the present.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab MILLER \'85
 BEEKEEPER. Millers and beekeepers are specified rarely in Domesday for some reason; though they obviously existed in considerable numbers, they were probably counted in with the villagers. This is another example, like the Cottagers in 7,4;6
, of the apparent striving for exactness of the author of the Lacy return (the Herefordshire fief of Roger of Lacy shows the same degree of precision). It seems less likely that it was the main scribe of Great Domesday himself who identified the craftsmen
 (so Gwynne, 'Social Classes in the Welsh Border Region', p. 100), because of the number of such inhabitants specified in the Lacy holding when compared with other fiefs in Shropshire. Lewis ('Introduction', }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Shropshire Domesday}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , pp. 8-9) used our argument t
o support his view that Roger of Lacy's agents made the returns for lands that Roger held, whether as tenant-in-chief or as the subtenant of Earl Roger or of the Bishop of Hereford, but that where Roger had a subtenant, that person mde the return.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 7,6\tab ALDON. This place was in Stokesay Ancient Parish. It lay in "Culvestan" Hundred in 1086, later in Munslow Hundred. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 964, Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 le Poer }
{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and others hold half a fee in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Euledon' }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 of the barony of Walter }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Lasey}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 while in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 70a, five men hold 2 \'bd hides in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Guledon' Inferior }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Superior }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Weho }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (View Edge and Weo, SO4280, SO4180; see 4,3,46 Clungunford note) of the heirs of Walter of Lacy; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. pp. 223, 245; Eyton, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , v. p. 26.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab SIWARD [* THE FAT *]. On this Siward being the son of Aethelgar, see SHR 7 Roger note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 15 PLOUGHS. [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday corrected }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 xv }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 xii}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
the two minims being joined to form a }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 v }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
which is taller than usual to emphasize the correction. It is not clear why he left the rest of the line blank after the plough estimate; compare 4,20,18 land note, 4,26,3 land note and 3f,2 church note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab RICHARD [* OF STANTON *]. See 7,4 Richard note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab ALDRED [* BROTHER OF SIWARD *]. See 4,3,15 Aldred note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab VALUE \'85 105s. The main scribe of Great Domesday interlined }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 7 v}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  above }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 c}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 8\tab LAND OF HUGH THE ASS. The manuscript has }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 lasne }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (not }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lasne}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , as Farley printed); the initial letters of bynames are often written
 in lower-case letters. It means 'the donkey'. 'the ass', from Old French }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 asne }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (Modern French }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 \'e2ne}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
with the French definite article. The Latin form }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 asinus }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 also occurs in Domesday (for example in WOR 27,1); see Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 359. The sign
ificance of the appellation is unclear.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab Hugh probably came to England with William son of Osbern and served under him, defending the English border against the Welsh. The bulk of his fief lay in Herefordshire. His Shropshire and Herefordshire border land
s passed to the Mortimers of Wigmore, but his estates that did not lie on the Welsh March }{\insrsid4139880 became the honour of Snodhill (Herefordshire) which was held from the early twelfth century by the Candos family; see Sanders, }{\i\insrsid4139880 
English Baronies}{\insrsid4139880 , p. 79; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\insrsid4139880 Domesday People}{\insrsid4139880 , p. 270}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab 
None of the estates in this chapter nor those in SHR 5-7, 9 lay north of Shrewsbury and with only a few exceptions all are found in the southernmost hundreds of Leintwardine, "Culvestan", 'Overs' and 'Conditre': SHR 5 Osbern note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 8,1\tab 
KNIGHTON. Knighton and the next entry Norton were places which were in Leintwardine Hundred in 1086. They were both Ancient Parishes and were effectively drawn into a Marcher lordship after 1086 and at the dissolution of these lordships in 1536 they w
ere placed in Radnorshire until the 1974 reorganization of counties after which they were in Powys.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab After 1086 both escheated to the Crown and in the Red Book of the Exchequer (Hall, ii p. 509), }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Kintone }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Nortone }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
are described as an escheat of Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Chandos}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 then held by Thomas }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Erdintone. }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
They went to the Mortimers and were gradually taken from the county of Shropshire and into their Marcher lordship. }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Kyngton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Norton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 are in Munslow Hundred in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 246 (of 1346), held pending the coming-of-age of Roger }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Mortuo Mari}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
but they are 'in Welshry' in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. no. 235 (of 1304), and in the Marches of Wales in x. no. 640 (of 1361). See }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 963; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 346.
\par \tab \tab In the manuscript the form is }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 CHENISTETVNE}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in the Ordnance Survey facsimile the }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 V }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
appears joined at the top and resembles an }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 O}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , as it also does in the Alecto facsimile; see 3c,7 Perkley note.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab LEOFFLED. She was the predecessor of Hugh the ass in several of his Herefordshire lands, as she was of some of Nigel the doctor's lands in that county.
\par \tab \tab The Domesday forms of this name - }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Leflet}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Leofleda}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lefflet}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Lefled}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880  - represent Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Leoffl\'e6d}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
, p. 311. JRM preferred the second element -fled}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 for the Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 -fl\'e6d}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 as it reflected the Domesday forms. The Phillimore printed edition has Leofled; the Alecto edition has Leoffl\'e6d.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 5 HIDES [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a space suitable for about five letters after }{\i\f703\cf1\insrsid4139880 v hid\'ea}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 see 1,5 hide note.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab A LARGE WOOD. Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 magna}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
 is only used of a wood four times in Domesday (here and in HEF 14,7. 25,9. 29,16): normally the extent of woodland was given or its productivity described in terms of pi
gs (1,7 woodland note) as woodland was an assessable resource. Presumably no information was available for the woodland other than its relative size: HEF 29,16 has 'a large wood there, but its size has not been stated'; compare 4,1,4 wood note.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 8,2\tab NORTON. For the history of the manor, see 8,1 Knighton note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 5 HIDES [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the rest of the line after }{\i\f703\cf1\insrsid4139880 v hid\'ea }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 which has no dot after it; see 1,5 hide note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab AND IS. The main scribe of Great Domesday initially omitted the }{\i\f710\cf1\insrsid4139880 7 \'e7}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  and had to squeeze it in between }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 fuit}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  and }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Ibi}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 .}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab A LARGE WOOD. See 8,1 wood note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 9\tab LAND OF NIGEL THE DOCTOR. He is possibly the same man as the plain Nigel who held under Earl Roger. On the difficulty of identifying him, see SHR 4,24 Nigel note.
\par \tab \tab None of the estates in this chapter nor those in SHR 5-8 lay north of Shrewsbury and with only a few exceptions all are found in the southernmost hundreds of Leintwardine, "Culvestan", 'Overs' and 'Conditre': SHR 5 Osbern note.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 9,1\tab WISTANSTOW. This was an Ancient Parish. It lay in Leintwardine Hundred in 1086, later in Munslow or Purslow Hundreds. It is possible that Wistanstow, "Cleu"}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(9,2), Woolston (4,20,18) and "Caurtune"}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (4,20,19) had originally formed a single block of land belonging to St Alkmund's (
SHR 3g St Alkmund's note) and which was held and alienated by Spirtes or his successors. He is expressly said to have held Wistanstow from St Alkmund's, while he held Woolston and "Cleu"}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
from overlords unspecified. St Alkmund's held "Caurtune",}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 but Spirtes
 is not said to have been involved in the alienation. Wistanstow was permanently alienated to the Fitz Alan barony of Clun; the stages by which it was lost are given in a monastic narrative: }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. p. 750 no. xvi, translated in Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. pp. 355-58.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab \tab John }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Stepelton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 holds 2 carucates in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wystanstowe }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 in Munslow Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 71a, from John Fitz Alan, while }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Wistanestowe }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 is accounted a member of Purslow Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 233
. The St Alkmund interest was later claimed by Lilleshall Abbey, but settled in a final concord of 1188; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Monasticon Anglicanum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , vi. pp. 265, 750; Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Antiquities of Shropshire}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 355. The 2 carucates mentioned in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 7 la
, may have been only part of the manor: half of Wistanstow was later held in Purslow Hundred by John Fitz Alan with Sibdon Carwood (4,20,7 Sibdon note), while further parts may have been }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feldhampton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
(Felhampton SO4487) held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , ii. p. 71a, by John }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 de Stepelton }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 from John Fitz Alan in Munslow Hundred (see }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , iv. p. 229) and Marsh (4,3,47 Strefford note).
\par \tab \tab See also Fleming, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Domesday Book and the Law}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 226 no.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 1335.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab SPIRTES THE PRIEST. He was a wealthy churchman who had held a total of nearly 80 hides in Somerset, Hampshire, Wiltshire, Shropshire and Herefordshire. According to Hemming (Hearne, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 Hemingi Chartularium}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 , p. 254; see 'Worcester G8' in WOR \{Appendix\}), he was a favourite of King Cnut's sons Harold and Harthacnut but he was banished by King Edward; see SHR 3d,7. He is}{\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
described as one of twelve canons of St Mary's, Bromfield, who alone held in 1066 ten out of the 20 hides in Bromfield in Shropshire (SHR 3d,7). He was Nigel's predecessor i
n several of the latter's holdings in Herefordshire, Wiltshire, Hampshire and Somerset.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab 4 HIDES [***]. After }{\i\f703\cf1\insrsid4139880 .iiii. hid\'ea}{\cf1\insrsid4139880  the main scribe of Great Domesday wrote the top stroke of a }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 T }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 (probably for }{
\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 T'ra}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 ),}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 then presumably realized he had meant to leave a space after the hidage (as elsewhere when he had not written (}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 non}{
\cf1\insrsid4139880 ) }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 geld}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
' after the hidage; see 1,5 hide note) and so did not complete it and omitted to erase it. This line is definitely not a link-line (generally used by the scribe to cover an erasure when no details are to be added later), as Farley printed it.}{
\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 9,2\tab "CLEU".}{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880  }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Apparently in Leintwardine Hundred in 1086, it has not been identified, although the involvement of Spirtes may suggest an alienation from St Alkmund's that was territorially close to Wistanstow (9,1); see Eyton, }{\i\cf1\insrsid4139880 
Antiquities of Shropshire}{\cf1\insrsid4139880 , xi. p. 365.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab SPIRTES [* THE PRIEST *]. See 9,1 Spirtes note.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank two-thirds of a line after the population, probably for the later insertion of the resources; see \{Introduction: Content and Layout\}.}{\cf1\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid4139880 \tab AFTER THIS ENTRY the remainder of folio 260d is blank, as are all of folio 261 and the recto of folio 262, though they have been frame-ruled; the account of Cheshire begins on the reverse of folio 262.}{\insrsid8798677 
\par }{\b\insrsid4139880 
\par }}