{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman{\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f2\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 02070309020205020404}Courier New;}{\f3\froman\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05050102010706020507}Symbol;}{\f4\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604020202020204}Helvetica;}
{\f10\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05000000000000000000}Wingdings;}{\f37\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603060405020304}Times{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f713\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE{\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f714\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f716\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f717\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur{\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f718\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew){\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f719\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic){\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f720\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic{\*\falt Times New Roman};}
{\f721\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese){\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f733\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1 Courier New CE;}{\f734\fmodern\fcharset204\fprq1 Courier New Cyr;}{\f736\fmodern\fcharset161\fprq1 Courier New Greek;}
{\f737\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1 Courier New Tur;}{\f738\fmodern\fcharset177\fprq1 Courier New (Hebrew);}{\f739\fmodern\fcharset178\fprq1 Courier New (Arabic);}{\f740\fmodern\fcharset186\fprq1 Courier New Baltic;}
{\f741\fmodern\fcharset163\fprq1 Courier New (Vietnamese);}{\f753\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Helvetica CE;}{\f757\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Helvetica Tur;}{\f760\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Helvetica Baltic;}
{\f1083\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times CE{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f1087\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times Tur{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f1090\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times Baltic{\*\falt Times New Roman};}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;
\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255;\red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;
\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0;\red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;\red51\green51\blue51;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 \snext0 
Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph Font;}{\*\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv 
\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{\s15\ql \li0\ri0\sb240\sa120\keepn\nowidctlpar\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin0\itap0 
\f4\fs28\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext16 Heading;}{\s16\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx360\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext16 Body Text;}{
\s17\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx360\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f37\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 \sbasedon16 \snext17 List;}{\s18\ql \li0\ri0\sb120\sa120\nowidctlpar\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin0\itap0 
\i\f37\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext18 \ssemihidden caption;}{\s19\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f37\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext19 
Index;}{\s20\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\aspalpha\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext20 Plain Text;}{\s21\ql \fi-1134\li1134\ri0\nowidctlpar
\tx1134\tx1418\tx9781\nooverflow\faauto\rin0\lin1134\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext21 dday;}{\*\cs22 \additive RTF_Num 2 1;}{\*\cs23 \additive \f3 RTF_Num 3 1;}{\*\cs24 \additive \f2 RTF_Num 3 2;}{\*\cs25 
\additive \f10 RTF_Num 3 3;}{\*\cs26 \additive \f3 RTF_Num 3 4;}{\*\cs27 \additive \f2 RTF_Num 3 5;}{\*\cs28 \additive \f10 RTF_Num 3 6;}{\*\cs29 \additive \f3 RTF_Num 3 7;}{\*\cs30 \additive \f2 RTF_Num 3 8;}{\*\cs31 \additive \f10 RTF_Num 3 9;}}{\*\revtbl {Unknown;}}
{\*\pgptbl {\pgp\ipgp0\itap0\li0\ri0\sb0\sa0}}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid5329606\rsid6037987\rsid11419375}{\*\generator Microsoft Word 10.0.6612;}{\info{\author matt}{\operator John Palmer}{\creatim\yr2007\mo7\dy21\hr20\min56}{\revtim\yr2007\mo7\dy30\hr20\min43}
{\printim\yr2113\mo1\dy1}{\version3}{\edmins3}{\nofpages43}{\nofwords19121}{\nofchars108992}{\*\company  University of Hull}{\nofcharsws127858}{\vern16389}}\paperw11909\paperh16834\margl1797\margr1797 
\deftab1080\widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\makebackup\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\hyphcaps0\horzdoc\dghspace120\dgvspace120\dghorigin1701\dgvorigin1984\dghshow0\dgvshow3\jcompress\viewkind4\viewscale100\nolnhtadjtbl\rsidroot11419375 
\fet0\sectd \sbknone\linex0\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4
\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}
{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \s21\qc \fi-1080\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar
\tx1080\tx1440\nooverflow\faauto\rin0\lin1080\itap0\pararsid5329606 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\b\insrsid11419375 NOTES
\par }{\insrsid11419375 (version 1a)}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }\pard \s21\ql \fi-1080\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\nooverflow\faauto\rin0\lin1080\itap0\pararsid5329606 {\insrsid5329606 
\par }\pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid5329606 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\cf1\insrsid11419375 WILTSHIRE. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote the running title }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 WILTESCIRE}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
 in vermilion capitals across the top of folios 64c,d, to 74c,d, centred above both columns. This is also the form used in the heading to the Landholders' List on folio 64c. There is no running title on folio 64a,b, the first page of the quire, because it
 is blank.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }\pard \ql \fi-1080\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin1080\itap0\pararsid5329606 {\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 M1\tab MESSUAGES. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Masura }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 (= }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 mansura}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
) was rendered as 'dwellings' in the Phillimore printed edition. However, the text makes clear that a }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 masura}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  can contain a }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 domus}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  ('house')}{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 and possibly a group of houses; it is therefore probably a house-site or messuage with or without dwellings on it. See NTT B8 for a similar statement of houses within messuages (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 
mansiones}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ).}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab 43s 6d. 51 dwellings at l0d is 42s 6d. Probably a figure error, as frequently in additions in Great Domesday. Domesday uses the old English}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
currency system which lasted for a thousand years until 1971. The pound contained 20 shillings, each of 12 pence, abbreviated as }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 \'a3}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 ibrae}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ), }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 s}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 olidi}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ) and }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 d}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 enarii}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ). Domesday often gi
ves smaller sums in multiples of pence (for example, 32d for 2s 8d in 1,21) and of shillings rather than in pounds, as here.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 M3\tab COTTAGERS. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Coscet }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 singular, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 coscez}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  cozets }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
plural, represent Anglo-Norman versions of Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 cot-seta}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , singular,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  cot-seta}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 n}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
), plural ('a cottage-dweller', 'cottage holder') from Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 cot}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  and}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  saeta}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 
English Place-Name Elements}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , under }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 cot-saeta}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ; }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Oxford English Dictionary}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , under }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 cotset}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
). The Anglo-Norman letter }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 z }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 represents the sound }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 ts }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 and the spelling }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 sc }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 a miscopied }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 
st }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 representing metathesis of }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 ts}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , so }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 coscet }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 = }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 cotset}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  coscez }{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 cozets }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 =}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  cotsets}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 The Old English plural }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 cot-seta}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 n}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 would be reflected in the plural }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 coscet }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 (= }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 cotset}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 ) found in}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 25,13 and 28,2. The plural in}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  -s }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 represented by }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 cozets }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 (= }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 cotsets}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 is the result of either a French adaptation, or an Old English change of inflexion, and is the form used in 1,1-15.
\par \tab \tab 'Cottagers' are almost entirely confined to the south-west counties, Wiltshire providing about 80% of the total entries. In Wiltshire, except in four cases, they are listed after villagers and smallholders, and usually before the cottagers (}{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 cotarii}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ).}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Very little is known about their status and economic position, though as can be seen from 24,15 and 32,10 they did have at least part of a pl
ough. See Jones, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Domesday for Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. lix.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 M7\tab DURAND OF GLOUCESTER. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Sheriff of Gloucestershire.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 M12\tab GEOFFREY THE MARSHAL. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 See 68,21 Geoffrey note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 M15\tab EDRIC <OF OLDBURY> 'S WIFE. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 The Latin is }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 uxor Edric}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
no genitive is indicated, as sometimes happens with names.}{\insrsid11419375 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab \tab On the identification, see 25,4 Edric note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 M16\tab ROGER OF BERKELEY.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  See 45,1.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab INJUDICIOUSLY. Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 incaute}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 perhaps meaning 'without security'.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab THESE TWO. 'Messuages' is meant.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 M17\tab AZUR. On his name, see 23,10 Azur note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 L34\tab WILLIAM OF MOHUN. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Willelmus de Moiun}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  is rendered as William of Mohun in deference to the more regular thirteenth-century sp
elling of the English form of the surname; but the place of origin was Moyon in the French d\'e9partement of Manche. The Domesday spelling is }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Moion}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  Moiun }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
etc; the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Liber Exoniensis}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  has }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Moione}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  Mouin}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 see Tengvik, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 98.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 L55\tab AIULF. On the form of the personal name see 55,1 Aiulf note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 L60\tab ROBERT BLUNT. His byname is here }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 flavus }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ('fair'); elsewhere }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 blundus }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ('blond') and }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 albus }{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 ('white').}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 L61\tab RICHARD STURMY. His byname is }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Sturmid}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Occurs as }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Sturmi}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  Sturmy }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 in the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 . Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 345, cites Godefroy, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 
Dictionnaire de l'Ancienne Langue Fran\'e7aise }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 (Paris 1898-1902), iii. p. 627: 'Old French }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 estormi}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 : "}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 \'e9tourdi}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  troubl\'e9}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  accabl\'e9}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 "'.}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
JRM in the Phillimore printed edition of Surrey (SUR 8,18) rendered this byname as 'reckless' according to the sense of }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 \'e9tourdi}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
(compare the English surname Sturdy, from Old French }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 estordit}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 'stunned', 'dazed', 'reckless', 'violent'), but a better renderi
ng would be 'turbulent', 'ready for battle'. For the present edition the byname has been standardized as Sturmy.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 L62\tab REGINALD CANUTE. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Rainaldus Canud}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 . The surname }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Canud}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  Canutus }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
is ambiguous. It can represent either the Old Scandinavian personal name }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Knutr }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 or the Old French adjective }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 chanu }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 (Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 canutus}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 ) meaning}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 'grey-haired' as in the French surnames (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 le}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ) }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Chanu}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 le}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  Chenu}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 see Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Old English Bynames}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 215.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 L65\tab GODESCAL.}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Old French }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Godescal }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 (Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Godescallus}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ),}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Godesscalc}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 are forms of the Old German personal name and byname }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Godassalc}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  Godscalc}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 'God's warrior' (modern German surname }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Gottschalk}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
anglicized }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Gosschalk}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 );}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 see Forssner, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Continental-Germanic Personal-Names}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, p. 121. The Old German name was not used or adopted by the English, so there is no modern or equivalent form. Modern English }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Gosschalk }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 is an adaptation of the modern immigrant surname }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Gottschalk}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 The best way to represent this personal name in a modern English translation would seem to be in the Old French }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Godescal}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 .}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 B1\tab HERVEY [* OF WILTON *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 B2\tab FOR A HAWK. Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 pro}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 perhaps 'instead of', 'in place of', an example of rents in kind being commuted.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab "ORAE".}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 An "ora" is literally an ounce. A unit of currency still in use in Scandinavia; reckoned at either 16d or 20d. See Harvey, 'Royal Revenue and Domesday Terminology'.}{
\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 B3\tab SALISBURY. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 The Domesday site was Old Sarum, the cathedral and the town being moved to the present site (SU1429) in the thirteenth century.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 B4\tab THIRD PENNY. A third of a borough's total revenues, to which the king was entitled; see Round, 'Tertius Denarius'.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab OF BATH. See SOM 1,31: 'Edward pays \'a311 of the third penny of this borough [Bath]'. It was probably included here because Edward of Salisbury was responsible for its collection.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab INCREASE. 'A premium paid by the sheriff in excess of the regular ferm [farm] for the privilege of farming the shire': Morris, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Medieval English Sheriff}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }
{\cf1\insrsid11419375 p. 64. See also OXF 1,12.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 B5\tab EXCEPT FOR the first line, this entry is written across the bottom of folio 64c,d, in three lines.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab WALTER HUSSEY. The byname is Old French }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 hosed }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ('provided with hose', 'wearing hose'): Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 370.}{
\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab TWO PARTS OF THE BOROUGH. That is, the king's two-thirds of the revenue of Malmesbury.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab ACRE. The Latin is }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 agr'}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 which could either abbreviate }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 agrum }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 from }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 ager }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ('field'), or, more likely, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 agram }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 from }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 agra}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
the regular word in the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Liber Exoniensis}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  for 'acre'. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Acra }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 is the usual word for 'acre' in GreatDomesday. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Agri }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
for }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 acrae }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 occurs also in SOM 1,9. As the payment here is rather large for only an acre, perhaps the word is being used more loosely as an area of land. Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 aecer }{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 means 'a plot of arable or cultivated land' as well as the particular local measure 'one acre'.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab BOATMEN. Probably 'seamen-warriors'; see Vinogradoff, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 English Society in the Eleventh Century}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 p. 20.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 1,1\tab IT IS NOT KNOWN HOW MANY HIDES ARE THERE. The Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 sint}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  is}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
subjunctive. The subjunctive and indicative are interchangeable in indirect questions in Medieval Latin. But see Round, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Feudal England}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 109. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Sint }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
occurs regularly in the same formula in SOM 1, where the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Liber Exoniensis}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  generally has }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 sunt}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 .}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab ONE NIGHT'S REVENUE. Many royal manors, especially in the south-west had to pay this revenue, which took the place of the normal tax payment, the manors not being assessed in hides. Originally this meant the amount of food n
eeded to support the king and his household for one night, though by the eleventh century these food rents were generally commuted. \'a380 is a probable figure before 1066, and \'a3100 after, for one night's revenue. Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 firma }
{\cf1\insrsid11419375 here is equivalent to Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 feorm }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ('a food rent'); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Oxford English Dictionary}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , under }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 farm }{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 (i). See also Poole,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  Exchequer in the Twelfth Century}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 p. 29.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab BURGESSES. Probably written in error in the middle of the manor's resources here; their usual place is with the 'villagers' etc. or as a separate entry before the 'value' statement.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab FURLONGS ... ACRES. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Quarentina }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
('furlong') is commonly used in Domesday for measurements of length, but also as a measurement of area, each side being 1 furlong, as in 24,5. 67,59 etc. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Acra }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ('acre
') is also used as an areal measure, as here. See OXF 18,1 furlong note and DEV 1,4 furlongs note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab ALFRED OF `SPAIN'. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 From Epaignes, in the d\'e9partement of Eure, France: Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 92. Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 hispania }{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 is a kind of word play.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab 5 HIDES. Possibly in Yatesbury (54,1).}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 1,2\tab A WOOD. See 39,1.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab HENRY OF FERRERS HOLDS }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 IT. The manuscript and Farley have }{\i\f720\cf1\insrsid11419375 e\'fb }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 eum}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 'it'), but the Ordnance Survey facsimile has not reproduced the line over the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 eu}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 .}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 1,3\tab LAND FOR 40 PLOUGHS. The
 detail amounts to 39 ploughs. Unlike in some other counties, the lordship and villagers' ploughs in Wiltshire do not always add up to the ploughs in the assessment; often, as here, they fall short, sometimes, as in 1,4, they exceed the estimate.}{
\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 On the frequent artificiality of the numbers in the plough assessment, see Finn, 'Teamland'.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab THIS MANOR [***]. The gap of about four letters in the manuscript is caused by an ink blot, which}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 appears to cover an erased word, possibly }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 redd' }{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 reddit}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 'pays').}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab EARL WILLIAM. Probably William son of Osbern, Earl of Hereford and 'regent' during}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 some of King William's absences; he was killed in battle in 1071. See also 1,21.}{\insrsid5329606 

\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab BOWCOMBE. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Transposition signs in the manuscript indicate that the sentence 'Earl William ... Amesbury revenue'}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
should belong here, preceding the one about the Abbess of Wilton. In the present translation the adjustment has been made.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab CHEVERELL. Probably Great Cheverell; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 VCH Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , x. p. 42.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab THANELANDS. Or perhaps singular, '(part) of the thaneland'. Thaneland was land}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 reserved by a lord, commonly a church, for the maintenance of a thane, armed and}{\insrsid11419375  }{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 mounted; it was usually inalienable and not automatically heritable. See Finn, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Introduction to Domesday Book}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , pp. 28-29,}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 138-39.}{
\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab ISLE OF WIGHT LAND. That is, Bowcombe, on the island. See also HAM 1,31.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab KING EDWARD ... ABBESS OF WILTON. Wilton Abbey was richly endowed and rebuilt}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 in stone by Queen Edith, Edward's wife, and consecrated in 1065. One of her brother}{\insrsid11419375  }{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 Harold's daughters, Gunnild, was a nun there; see Darlington, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Vita Wulfstani}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 34.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 1,5\tab CHIPPENHAM. An outlying part of Chippenham, possibly that mentioned in 45,2, was at Kingswood near Wootton-under-Edge, entirely surrounded by Gloucestershire. It was transferred to Gloucestershire in 1844.}{
\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab BISHOP OSBERN [* OF EXETER *]. Bishop o}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 f Exeter 1072-1103. Brother of William son of Osbern, Earl of Hereford.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab ONE LAND. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Una terra}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 not classified as a manor.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab RECORDED. Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 habet}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 ur}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ];}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 see also 25,9 and BDF 12,1.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 1,6\tab 12 VILLAGERS. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 7}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  ('and') is written under the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 x }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 of }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 xii}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 in error.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 1,9\tab [* COUNTESS *] }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
GYTHA. Probably Countess Gytha, mother of Earl Harold, as this holding, and also 1,10;13, are said to have been Harold's (and, for 1,13, Queen Edith's) in the Tax Returns for Swanborough, 'Thornhill' and Calne Hundreds respectively in the }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Liber Exoniensis}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 .}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 1,10\tab [* COUNTESS *] GYTHA. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 See 1,9 Gytha note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 1,11\tab EARL TOSTI. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Brother of Earl Harold and Queen Edith, and Earl of Northumbria; killed in 1066.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab DEPENDENCIES. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Appendic' }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 in the manuscript; Farley misprinted }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 append'}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 .}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab ASSESS. The Ordnance Survey facsimile has not reproduced the line over the second }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 p }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 appciant'}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 .}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab SAINT-ETIENNE OF CAEN. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Founded by Duke William, the future King William, in 1064 and consecrated in 1066.}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Lanfranc, afterwards Archbishop of Canterbury, was
 the first abbot.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab EDGAR [* THE PRIEST *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 1,12\tab VALUE. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 App'ciant' }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 (for }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 appreciantur}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
passive) in the manuscript and Farley, in error for the active }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 appreciant}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 as in 1,11.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 1,13\tab [* COUNTESS *] GYTHA.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  See 1,9 Gytha note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab 60 ACRES. So the manuscript; Farley misprinted '40 acres'.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 1,14\tab BROMHAM. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Version A of the Tax Return for Calne Hundred (Exon folio 1a5) gives the name. Queen Edith, the 1066 holder in the Tax Return, perhaps names St Edith's Marsh; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 
Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 255.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 1,15\tab WOOTTON [RIVERS].}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  This Wootton can be identified in the Tax Return for Kinwardstone Hundred.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 1,16\tab POTTERS. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Potarii}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 . Possibly a scribal mistake for }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 porcarii }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ('pigmen'); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 
Domesday Geography of South-West England}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 29 note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab A MINOR CLERIC HOLDS IT. Written above 'Value of the church', with transposition signs to indicate its correct place.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab WILLIAM SHIELD. On the byname, see Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 372. Also see 68,20 and 2,4 William note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 1,17\tab WINTERBOURNE [STOKE].}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  Versions B and C of the Tax Return for 'Dolesfield' Hundred (Exon folios 7a2, 13a2) record that the king's reeve of }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Winterburnestoca }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
retained tax of 2 hides and 1 virgate, the amount for which this Domesday Winterbourne paid tax.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab ABBOT OF JUMIEGES. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Abb'}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 perhaps abbreviating }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 abbatia }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ('abbey').}{\insrsid5329606 

\par }{\insrsid11419375 1,18\tab HERVEY [* OF WILTON *].}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  See 68,2. Probably Hervey of Wilton; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 VCH Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ii. pp. 75, 106.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab NIGEL THE DOCTOR. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 See 56,3.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 1,19\tab COLLINGBOURNE [DUCIS]. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Named from the Dukes of Lancaster to whom the royal holding later passed; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, pp. 342-43. See also 10,2 Collingbourne note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab [VILLAGERS]. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 car' }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ('ploughs') in error.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab TITHE. The only reference to tithe in Domesday Wiltshire.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 1,20\tab [EAST] KNOYLE.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  Formerly Knoyle Regis; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. xl.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 1,21\tab LYDIARD [MILLICENT].}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  It can be identified in the Tax Return for Chippenham Hundred; it is later in 'Staple' Hundred.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab EARL WILLIAM. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 See 1,3 William note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 1,22\tab [***]. The gap of about 16 letters in the manuscript was probably for the later addition of }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 T.R.E.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  holder.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 1,23c\tab REINBALD THE PRIEST [***]. The gap of about four letters in the manuscript, not reproduced by Farley, is due to an erasure. On Reinbald, see SOM 1,8 Reinbald note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 1,23f\tab BISHOP OSBERN [* OF EXETER *]. See 1,5 Osbern note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 1,23h\tab BISHOP OSMUND [* OF SALISBURY *]. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Bishop of Salisbury 1078-1099.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 2\tab LAND OF THE BISHOP OF WINCHESTER. Many of these holdings were later in the hands of the priory of St Swithun,}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Winchester.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 2,1\tab IN THE MANUSCRIPT }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Fac. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 is written in the left margin level with the chapter number; it is not reproduced by Farley.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab DOWNTON. The forest is mentioned in all three versions of the Tax Return for Downton Hundred (Exon folios 2b7, 9a5, 15b3.) and is}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
probably Melchet Forest rather than the New Forest; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Domesday Geography of South-West England}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 37.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab 100 HIDES LESS 3. The reason for the scribe writing the number like this, rather than 97, is explained here, but this is not so in every case, such as the '100 villagers less 8' in 1,12.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab BISHOP WALKELIN. Bishop of Winchester 1070-1098.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 2,3\tab FYFIELD.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  The Bishop of Winchester later holds Fifield in Enford; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ii. p. 258a;}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  Place-Names of Wiltshire}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. xl. But St Swithin's, Winchester, holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Fifhide }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 with Overton (see 2,11), in 'Selkley' Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ii. p. 234b. See
 }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 748; }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , v. p. 205. 'Five Hides' is the taxable extent in Domesday; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 295.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab ALSI THE MONK. On this name-form, see 36,1 Alsi note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab MONKS' SUPPLIES. The monks concerned are those of the Benedictine monastery which was connected with Winchester Cathedral. The tenants of the following estates (2,4-12) had to provide a certain amount of food for the monks.}{
\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 2,4\tab ALTON [PRIORS].}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  For the identification, see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 317.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab WILLIAM SHIELD. One of King William's cooks, according to a charter (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Calendar of Charter Rolls}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
iii. p. 345) in which the Bishop of Winchester, at the king's request, granted to William Shield, his cook, land held by Wulfward }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Belgisone}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Alwolditon}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
 [Alton Priors]; it was to revert to the monks on the cook's death.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 2,7\tab WROUGHTON. This holding is }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Nether Werston' }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ii. p. 243b. For 'Over Wroughton', see 27,7 Wroughton note.}{
\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 2,8\tab BUSHTON. The meaning is bishop's }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 tun}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , pp. 266-67. See also }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 737; and 20,3 Clyffe note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab OF THIS LAND. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 De }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 in the manuscript, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 de }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 in Farley.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 2,10\tab 10 HIDES IN LORDSHIP. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 s't }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 sunt}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 );}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
Farley unusually extended it to }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 sunt}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 the reverse happens in SOM 1,10 and SOM 3,1.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab HAROLD <OF ENFORD>. The tenant of this modest holding had no tenurial associations with any of his namesakes, none of them close by. Enford is likely to have been his only property (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 2,11\tab [EAST] OVERTON.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  For the identification, see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 305 note 1. For [West] Overton, see 13,8 Overton note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab [***] VILLAGERS. Space was left in the manuscript for the insertion of the number of villagers, with }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 rq' }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 (= }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 require}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, 'enquire') written in vermilion in the centre margin. Farley omitted the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 rq'}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 .}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 2,12\tab VALUE 100s AND 10s. Either 110s is meant, or }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 x. sol' }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 is a manuscript error for }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 x. den'}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 ('10d'). See SUS 3,1 for an identical case, and BDF 27,1 for }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 ual' .c. sol' 7 x. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 There are many instances in Domesday of corrections of }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 sol' }{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 to }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 den' }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 and vice versa.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 3,1\tab BISHOP HERMAN. Bishop of Ramsbury and Sherborne 1045-1078; the see was then moved to Salisbury where Herman's successor was Bishop Osmund.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab ALWARD }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 HOLDS 3 HIDES WHICH WULFWARD WHITE BOUGHT. See 67,11 and 67,11 Osmund note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab ARNULF OF HESDIN. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 See 25,2.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab 1 VIRGATE. The manuscript and Farley have an abbreviation mark over the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 v }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 for virgate; the}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
Ordnance Survey facsimile has not reproduced it.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab BISHOP ^[OF SALISBURY]^}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  CLAIMS THEM. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Eas}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 probably referring just to Arnulf's holding, as can be}{
\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 gathered from 25,2. However, Bishop Osmund was also claiming Alward's 3 hides (67,11).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 3,2\tab 4 PLOUGHS. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 .ii.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , with }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 ii. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 written above it to make }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 iiii. car'}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 .
}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 3,5\tab SHIPLEY. Possibly the place in Aldbourne (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 293), but not necessarily in Wiltshire.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 4\tab BISHOP OF BAYEUX. Odo, half brother of King William, and Earl of Kent; he was}{\insrsid11419375  '}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 regent' during some of King William's absences.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 4,1\tab [NORTH] }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 TIDWORTH. For the identification, see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 370. South Tidworth (SU2347) is just in Hampshire (HAM 28,3;6. 60,1)}{
\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 and the holdings at North Tidworth, 12 hides in all, probably straddled the border. See 24,14 Tidworth note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 4,3\tab WADARD <OF COGGES>. The name Wadard occurs on some 50 holdings in Domesday Book, all pro
bably held by one individual. All but a couple of properties in Kent were held as a tenant of the Bishop of Bayeux, the exceptions being held from St Augustine's Abbey which accommodated other of Odo's tenants. This singular distribution proves Wadard's i
dentity, confirmed by the descent of his holdings to form the core of the barony of Cogges: Sanders, }{\i\insrsid11419375 English Baronies}{\insrsid11419375 , pp. 36-37; Keats-Rohan, }{\i\insrsid11419375 Domesday People}{\insrsid11419375 , p. 444 (JP).}{
\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 4,4\tab ROBERT [* THE BURSAR *].}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  Possibly Robert the bursar who appears in all three versions of the Tax Returns for 'Branchbury' Hundred (Exon folios 3a1, 9a7, 15b5).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab AZUR. On his name, see 23,10 Azur note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 5\tab BISHOP OF COUTANCES. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Geoffrey of Mowbray, one of King William's chief justices.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 5,1\tab DRAYCOT [FITZPAYNE]. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Analysis of the Tax Returns shows that this Draycot lay in Swanborough Hundred.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 5,2\tab `WITTENHAM'.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  A lost place in Wingfield; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 123.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 5,3\tab AZUR. On his name, see 23,10 Azur note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 5,6\tab LITTLETON [DREW].}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  The same place as 7,5 since Alward held from Glastonbury before 1066. This is probably Littleton Drew as in 7,5 it is listed with Stanton St Quintin; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 
Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 241.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab ABBOT OF GLASTONBURY. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 See 7,10.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 6\tab BISHOP OF LISIEUX. Gilbert Maminot, King William's doctor and chaplain.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 6,1\tab YATTON [KEYNELL]. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , pp. 23-24, identifies this }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Etune }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
with Castle Eaton (see 21,1), but an analysis of the Tax Returns shows that there was a holding of the bishop in Chippenham Hundred. See 25,27 Yatton note and 66,1 Eaton note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 6,2\tab SOMERFORD [KEYNES].}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  Held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 738, by William }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 de Kaignes}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, who probably inherited indirectly from the bishop; see Jones, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Domesday for Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 234; }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 VCH Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, ii. p. 123 no. 56; and DOR 6 bishop note. It was transferred to Gloucestershire in 1897.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 7,1\tab DAMERHAM. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 It was transferred to Hampshire in 1895.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab HUGH [* SON OF GRIP *]'S WIFE. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab [THE LANDS]. The Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 appreciantur}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  is plural,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 although the subject grammatically is }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 totum manerium (}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 'the whole manor'); possibly a scribal error.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab MEN. Probably the jurors who were called together to give information to the Domesday Commissioners as to the extent and value of the several estates; see Jones, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Domesday for Wiltshire}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 28.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 7,2\tab LIFETIMES OF THREE MEN. That is, the purchaser of the 3 hides and his two succeeding heirs.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 7,3\tab DEVERILL. This entry and 7,16 refer to two Glastonbury holdings each of 10 hides, with 5 hides in lordship. The Tax Return for Heytesbury Hundred allows one to be identified as Longbridge Deverill (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 
De'vel Lungpunt }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 732; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, p. 166), and the Tax Return for Mere Hundred allows the other to be identified as Monkton Deverill (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 174), but it is impossible to say which is which. The land was gr
anted by King Athelstan, and it is clear from the Glastonbury Feodary (Weaver, pp. xxiv and 19) that it was regarded as one holding of 20 hides. The subtenancies given in the Feodary do not help with identification. The second Domesday entry refers to woo
d\-land 2 leagues long and \'bd league wide. The modern Longbridge Deverill has extensive woodland in the neighbourhood of Shear Water.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 7,4\tab EDWARD [* OF SALISBURY *].}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  He is possibly Edward the sheriff whose successors held}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  Aven }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 [Avon], probably the village in Christian Malford (ST9586); see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 720.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab THANELAND. See 1,3 thanelands note. This is an example of the holders not being able to dispose of their land.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 7,5\tab STANTON [ST QUINTIN]. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Analysis of the Tax Returns shows that it lay in Startley Hundred. See 5,6 Littleton note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab 6 ACRES. In the manuscript above and between }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 vi }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 ac's }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 there is an ink blot shaped rather like }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 i}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 which Farley reproduced as a figure, perhaps believing it was an intended correction of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 vi }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 to }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 vii }{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 However, it is not in quite the usual place for a correction and there is no insertion mark. Also, 7 acres would not add up with the 4 to make the 10 acres mentioned, and Osbern Giffard is stated to have 6 acres of meadow in 48,4.}{
\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab ALWARD. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Probably the same Alward as in 5,6.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab BISHOP GEOFFREY [* OF COUTANCES *]. Bishop o}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 f Coutances; see WIL 5.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 7,10\tab BISHOP OF COUTANCES.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  See 5,6.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 7,11\tab [KINGTON] LANGLEY. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 On the identity and name, see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 101. The Glastonbury holding (with Nettleton and Grittleton) is }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Kinkton }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, p. 732. Analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in Thorngrove Hundred. The church in fact held the manor of Kington St Michael, of which Kington Langley is a hamlet; see the Glastonbury Feodary}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
(Weaver, pp. xxiii, 13).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 7,12\tab LANGFORD. Edward (of Salisbury) holds from the bishop and the Salisbury land was at }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Parva Langeford}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ; see}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, v. p. 243; the Glastonbury Feodary}{\insrsid11419375  (Weaver,}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  p. xxv).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab EDWARD [* OF SALISBURY *]. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Edward of Salisbury.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 7,13\tab EDWARD [* OF SALISBURY *] }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 HOLDS 1 HIDE. See 24,42.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab TO THE ABBEY AS THANELAND. }{\i\f713\cf1\insrsid11419375 Abbati\'ea ad tainlande}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 or perhaps 'to the thaneland}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
of the abbey', reading }{\i\f713\cf1\insrsid11419375 abbati\'ea }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 as genitive rather than dative. See 1,3 thanelands note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 7,14\tab IDMISTON. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Eunestetone}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  is a difficult form. It is}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 not the same name as Idmiston (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 
Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 380), although it possibly refers to the same place. It appears to represent a compound of Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 tun}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 ('farm', 'village') with either the superlative (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 -este}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 of the adjective }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 efn }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
('level', 'smooth'), or, more likely, metathesis of Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 efnetes}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 genitive singular of }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 efnet }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
('a smooth or level place'). Nonetheless, an analysis of the Tax Returns shows that this holding lay in Alderbury Hundred, and there was a Glastonbury holding at }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Idemeston }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 
Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 746. See }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , v. p. 200; }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 VCH Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ii. p. 96; the Glastonbury Feodary}{\insrsid11419375  (Weaver,}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375  p. xxvi).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 7,15\tab WINTERBOURNE. Probably on the River Bourne, as an analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in Alderbury Hundred. The 5-hide holding here, added to the 10 hides of }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Eunestetone }{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 (7,14)}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 accounts for the 15 hides }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 of Idemeston }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 in the Glastonbury Feodary (Weaver,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
p. xxvi).}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 7,16\tab DEVERILL. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 See 7,3 Deverill note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 8,3\tab SOMERFORD. The Abbot of Malmesbury holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Som'ford Mauduth }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 (= Little}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Somerford) in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ii. p. 272a; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 73.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 8,5\tab NORTON. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Analysis of the Tax Returns shows that it lay in Startley Hundred.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 8,6\tab RANULF FLAMBARD. A royal chaplain in 1086 and Bishop of Durham 1099-1128. His first name is abbreviated }{\i\f720\cf1\insrsid11419375 R\'e2 }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 here, }{\i\f720\cf1\insrsid11419375 R\'e2}{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 n' }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 in the 'value' paragraph, and simply }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 R}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
in 8,9. Such abbreviations of personal names occur throughout Domesday.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 8,7\tab KEMBLE. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 It was transferred to Gloucestershire in 1897.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 8,8\tab [LONG] NEWNTON. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 It was transferred to Gloucestershire in 1930.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 8,9\tab CHARLTON. Analysis of the Tax Returns shows that it lay in "Cicemetone" Hundred.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab RANULF FLAMBARD. See 8,6 Ranulf note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab RALPH. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Radulf}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 us}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ].}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  VCH Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ii. p. 126 no. 79, has 'Ralf (}{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 recte }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Ranulf)', but two different people must be}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 meant because of the statement 'value of what the men hold'.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 8,12\tab OF THIS [LAND] ALSO [***]. In the manuscript there is a gap of about five letters due to an erasure, but no sign of the original word can be seen; perhaps the scribe intended to write some such word as }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 terra}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 .}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab GILBERT FROM HIM. Gilbert's 2 hides are at Thickwood (24,30).}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab WILLIAM OF EU HOLDS 1 HIDE. William of Eu's holding is Ditteridge (32,11) which is at the other end of the hundred from Bremhill. It is adjacent to Gilbert's holding at Thickwood, both distant from Bremhill.}{
\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab ALSTAN [* OF BOSCOMBE *].}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  From 32,14 it is clear that this is Alstan of Boscombe.}{\insrsid11419375 
\par }\pard\plain \s20\ql \fi-1080\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\aspalpha\faauto\rin0\lin1080\itap0\pararsid5329606 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab \tab }{\insrsid11419375 
Predecessor of William of Eu who acquired almost all of Alstan's holdings as well as those of his men; see Clarke, }{\i\insrsid11419375 English Nobility}{\insrsid11419375 , pp. 229-31, to which should be added "Slacham" (HAM 1,32), Boxbu
ry (HRT 28,3), Eckweek (SOM 19,61), and possibly Stourton Caundle DOR 26,70) and Barton (SOM 21,92). Boxbury was evidently omitted by accident; but the Alstan of "Slacham" is identified by the intermediate ownership of Ralph of Lim\'e9
sy, while he of Eckweek 
is named in Exon. Eckweek devolved upon the Count of Mortain so it is possible that the two other holdings he acquired from an Alstan in Dorset and Somerset, both of which lay in the same general area as the remainder of Alstan of Boscombe's in those coun
ties, came from the same man (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }\pard\plain \ql \fi-1080\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin1080\itap0\pararsid5329606 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\cf1\insrsid11419375 8,13\tab 21 \'bd HIDES ARE. The Latin is }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 s't .xxi. hida 7 dim'}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 The singular }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 hida }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 is usual in Domesday with the number }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 xxi }{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 (see 12,6 villagers note), but }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 est}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  ('is'), should be the verb here rather than }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 sunt}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  ('are').}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 9\tab ST PETER'S OF WESTMINSTER. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 In the manuscript the words }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Petrus Westmonast' }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 are}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
blurred and appear to have been written on}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 top of an erasure.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 9,1\tab THIRD PENNY. See B4 penny note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 10\tab LAND OF THE ABBEY OF ST PETER OF WINCHESTER. These holdings later belonged to the Abbey of Hyde, Winchester.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 10,2\tab COLLINGBOURNE [KINGSTON].}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  Earlier Collingbourne Abbatis; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , pp. 342-43; and 1,19}{\insrsid11419375  Collingbourne }{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab CROC [* THE HUNTER *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab THANELAND. See 1,3 thanelands note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 10,3\tab ARNULF OF HESDIN HOLDS 2 HIDES. For these 2 hides, see 25,6, an entry underlined for deletion; the value of the 2 hides there, however, is stated as 40s.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 10,4\tab ADDESTONE. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 The name means 'abbot's }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 tun}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 '; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 233.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 11,2\tab 1 HIDE IN DAMERHAM. The single hide is perhaps represented by Hyde Farm, (SU0814); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 401. Damerham was transferred to Hampshire in 1895.}{
\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 12,1\tab HARDING [* SON OF ALNOTH *]. The name Harding occurs on 48 holdings in Domesday Book, probably representing six or seven individuals. Peter Clarke has assigned all 33 }{\i\insrsid11419375 T.R.E.}{\insrsid11419375 
 holdings in Great Domesday to Harding son of Alnoth (Clarke, }{\i\insrsid11419375 English Nobility}{\insrsid11419375 , pp. 282-83), while Katharine Keats-Rohan has attributed 15 of the 17 1086 tenancies to the same man (}{\i\insrsid11419375 
Domesday People}{\insrsid11419375 , p. 244). Of the other two, Ann Williams (}{\i\insrsid11419375 The English and the Norman Conquest}{\insrsid11419375 
, p. 120 note 125) has shown that the Berkshire holding was probably held by the individual who held in Dorset and Wiltshire in 1086, a
nd seventeenth tenancy was held by a burgess of Oxford. The grounds for the majority of these attributions have not been stated but are relatively easy to reconstruct. 29 of the 33 }{\i\insrsid11419375 T.R.E.}{\insrsid11419375 
 holdings in Great Domesday were connected in some way with Earl Aubr
ey of Coucy. Three of these (67,60-62) were held by Harding at both dates, as were three of the remaining four holdings without the Coucy link. As the survival of more than one Englishman with an uncommon name holding the same properties at both dates wit
h
in a limited area is improbable, all six properties may have been held by the same individual. The final 1066 holding, at Winterslow (20,6) was connected indirectly to the other 32: Harding held another property in the same vill (23,3), one which also dev
o
lved upon Aubrey de Coucy. All 33 1066 holdings therefore probably belonged to one man. Of the 1086 tenancies, Harding is named as the son of Alnoth in the Somerset holdings, which descended to the Merriott family through his eldest son Nicholas (SOM 47,3
-
8). The remaining properties in Berkshire, Dorset, Somerset, and Wiltshire have been discussed above, leaving those in Buckinghamshire, Gloucestershire, Hampshire, and Warwickshire to be accounted for. Ann Williams has suggested that the Gloucestershire H
arding is the son of Alnoth, on grounds of proximity to the family's Bristol base (}{\i\insrsid11419375 The English and the Norman Conquest}{\insrsid11419375 
, p. 120); his connections with other royal manors and with Queen Edith offer a possible link with the Hampshire holding (HAM 6,1); and the
 Warwickshire holding lay between those held by Harding in the county in 1066 (WAR 17,30). The two modest, adjacent Buckinghamshire holdings have no discernible links to other Harding properties and may have belonged to another English survivor. Doubts ha
ve been raised about the identification of the 1066 landholder with Harding son of Alnoth, however, principally on the grounds that William of Malmesbury reports him to have been active in the 1120s (}{\i\insrsid11419375 Gesta Regum}{\insrsid11419375 
, p. 471), too old to have held land before the Conquest (Lewis, }{\cf17\insrsid11419375 'Formation of the Honour of Chester'}{\insrsid11419375 
, pp. 67-68). But the tenurial history of Beechingstoke (12,1) tends to confirm the identification. Harding held this manor in 1066, and Harding son of Alnoth was litigating about it in the
 reign of Henry I. Moreover, the tenant-in-chief of Beechingstoke was Shaftesbury Abbey, to which Harding son of Alnoth donated land when his daughter became a nun there: Williams, }{\i\insrsid11419375 The English and the Norman Conquest}{
\insrsid11419375 , pp. 120-21 (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 12,2\tab FROM THE ABBEY. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 de abb'ia}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Farley misprinted }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 de abb'a}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ;}{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 i}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  is very faint, however, in the manuscript. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Abb'ia }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 is the normal abbreviation for }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 
abbatia}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ('abbey'), whereas }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 abb'a }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 is unusual, both as an abbreviation for }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 abbatia}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
and for }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 abbatissa}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  ('abbess').}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 12,4\tab SESTERS. The sester is a measure, sometimes of liquid, as here, sometimes dry, as in}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 WIL 24p; of uncertain and probably variable size, reckoned at 32 oz. for honey.}{
\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab "ARPENT". A French measure of uncertain and probably variable size, usually applied in Domesday to vineyards, as here and in 55,1, but to meadow in 50,1. 68,4;7;10 and to woodland in 68,8.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 12,6\tab DINTON. Later a detached part of Warminster Hundred; an analysis of the Tax Returns shows that it lay in that hundred. Compare 44,1 Fisherton note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab 21 VILLAGERS. Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 uill}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 anu}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 s}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
singular, for }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 uill}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 an}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 i}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
plural, as elsewhere with 21, 31, etc. in Domesday. But see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 xxi. coscez}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 rather than }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 xxi. coscet }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 in 13,1.}{
\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 13,1\tab STANTON [ST BERNARD]. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Analysis of the Tax Returns shows that it lay in Swanborough Hundred. See also }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ii. p. 274b.}{\insrsid5329606 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 13,2\tab 10 PLOUGHS CAN PLOUGH. An unusual phrase in Domesday Wiltshire. In the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Liber Exoniensis}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  it is the regular formula for Great Domesday's 'Land for }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 n}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375  ploughs'.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab 1 HIDE AND 1 \'bd VIRGATES ... RICHARD STURMY. Possibly at Huish; see 68,3.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 13,3\tab SERVED AS A THANE. Possibly rendering military service.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab 6 OXEN IN THE LORD'S PLOUGH. Unusually exact. The }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Liber Exoniensis}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
 regularly gives the number of oxen actually there, but Great Domesday generally rounds the oxen at work up or down to the nearest \'bd plough, at 8 oxen to a plough; see 28,10 oxen note. The formula 'Land for }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 n}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375  oxen' is more common, however, in Great Domesday.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 13,7\tab [WEST] KNOYLE.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  Also Little Knoyle and Knoyle Hodierne. The 10 hides here contrast with the 30 at [East] Knoyle (1,20). See }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, v. p. 267; and 1,20 Knoyle note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 13,8\tab [WEST]}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  OVERTON. The Wilton Abbey holding was at West Overton; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 305 note l. For East Overton, see 2,11 Overton note.}{
\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 13,9\tab CHALKE. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 The Domesday holding no doubt included Broad and Bower Chalke, Berwick and Semley: }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , v. p. 201.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab GERARD HOLDS 3 HIDES. Gerard's holding is represented by Gurston in Broad Chalke (SU0225); see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 205.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab RICHARD POYNANT HOLDS 7 \'bd HIDES. They reappear in his fief (58,2), located at Trow. St Mary's of Wilton is said to have held it before 1066, a statement equivalent to the claim here recorded.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab SERVING AS VILLAGERS. Presumably this means they rendered the same services as are due from villagers.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab 5 PLOUGHS. See 58,2; there are 4 ploughs given there, however.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 13,10\tab [SOUTH] NEWTON.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  The affix 'South' distinguishes this place from North Newnton (13,2) which has the same etymology. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, p. 322, identifies a Domesday forebear for North Newnton (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Newetone}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ), but not for South Newton (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Newentone}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ) (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}
{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 228). The evidence of the Tax Return for 'Branchbury' Hundred is unsatisfactory, but the Abbess of Wilton holds both South Newton and North Newnton in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 739.}{
\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab MELCHET FOREST. If the modern wood represents the Domesday site, it is fourteen miles away, whereas Grovely Wood (67,99) is 2 \'bd miles distant. For another mention of Melchet Forest, see 13,18.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab [SOUTH] NEWTON. VALUE \'a316. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 In the manuscript the value of South Newton is placed at the end of the next entry, with signs in the manuscript to indicate its correct position.}{\insrsid11419375 
 In the present edition it has been moved to this position.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 13,11\tab WYLYE. A river name, probably like Winterbourne applied to several settlements. Bathampton (27,15-16) can be separately identified.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 13,12\tab WISHFORD. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 The Wilton Abbey holding was Little Wishford; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , v. pp. 202, 243.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 13,13\tab LANGFORD. Little Langford; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , v. p. 243. The boundaries of the grant of land are in Kemble, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Codex Diplomaticus}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, iii. no. 419 (= Sawyer, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Anglo Saxon Charters}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , no. 612).}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 13,18\tab MELCHET FOREST. For the other mention, see 13,10.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab [REPAIRING]. Probably, as in 13,10, although 'building' could be meant}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 13,20\tab SITUATED IN THE KING'S FOREST. The Forest is Clarendon, which also included half of the 'land' (that is, not only the woodland) of both parts of Milford (27,27. 67,79); see 27,27 forest note and 67,79 forest note.}{
\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 13,21\tab FROM THEM. That is, from the 2 hides.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 15,1\tab 2 \'bd HIDES IN LORDSHIP. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Analysis of the Tax Returns shows 1 hide of this land lay in 'Whorwellsdown' Hundred, and that 1 \'bd
 hides lay in Heytesbury Hundred, suggesting that the estate had portions of its land in both hundreds.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab 21 VILLAGERS. See 12,6 villagers note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab WILLIAM [* SHIELD *].}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  He is William Shield. He restored to Romsey Abbey his holdings here and at Ashton (15,2
) when two of his daughters became nuns there; see the charter of Henry 1 confirming this restoration, in Farrer, 'Itinerary of King Henry I', no. 173. See also 2,4 villagers note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab HERVEY [* OF WILTON *]. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Probably Hervey of Wilton; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 VCH Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ii. pp. 75, 106.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 15,2\tab ASHTON.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  Analysis of the Tax Returns shows that it lay in 'Whorwellsdown' Hundred. See also }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , v. p. 210.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab WILLIAM [* SHIELD *].}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  For the identification, see 15,1 William note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 16,1\tab BULFORD.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 126, identifies Bulkington, but an analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in Amesbury Hundred. See }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , v. p. 199; VCH }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ii. p. 131 no 124; and 16,3 Allington note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 16,3\tab ALLINGTON. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, p. 90, identifies Allington in Chippenham. However, an analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that this Amesbury holding lay in Amesbury Hundred, and the entries for Bulford (16,1) and Allington are in sequence with Boscombe and Cho
ulston (16,2;4) which are in this hundred. See 23,6 Tytherington note.
\par \tab \tab . For Harold's taking of this land, which was subsequently restored to the church, see 23,7.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 16,5\tab THE CHURCH HELD 2 HIDES }{\insrsid11419375 ^[IN WINTERSLOW]^}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 . In the manuscript there are sig
ns next to this entry and to the statement in the entry for Winterslow (20,6) that the Abbess of Amesbury held 2 hides of that manor.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab THE COUNT OF MORTAIN. Robert, the half-brother of King William, and a large landholder in the south-west, especially Cornwall; he had wrongful possession of numerous holdings.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 16,6\tab WINTERBOURNE [BASSETT]. Both this and the next entry (Maddington: 16,7) are plain }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Wintreburne}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  in Domesday. In }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, pp. 742, 749, these two holdings appear as a half of Maddington and the whole of }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Abbedeston}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 The latter, 'abbot's }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 tun}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 ', survives as Rabson Farm in Winterbourne Bassett; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 309. Maddington is 'Maidens (that is, nuns') }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 tun}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
', earlier }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Maydenewynterburna}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ; see}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, p. 233. However, it is not clear which Domesday 'Winterbourne' is which of these, except that the Church of Amesbury's 4 \'bd hides in 16,7 are probably the 'half of Maddington', Matthew of Mortagne holding 4 hides as the other 'half' in 63,1.}{
\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 16,7\tab MADDINGTON. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 For the identification, see 16,6 Winterbourne note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 17,1\tab [BRIXTON] DEVERILL.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  The affix is from the name of the pre-Conquest holder, Brictric; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , pp. 165-66.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab BRICTRIC [* SON OF ALGAR *]. He is B}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 rictric son of Algar, a great English thane who held much land in the west. He was the lord of Tewkesbury manor;}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
see GLS l,34-35;39. Many of his lands passed to William's queen, Matilda (see GLS 1,42 queen note) and, on her death in 1083.}{\insrsid11419375 
\par }{\insrsid5329606 \tab \tab }{\insrsid11419375 His estate has been careful
ly reconstructed by Ann Williams whose detailed and persuasive arguments need not be repeated here: Williams, 'A West-Country Magnate of the Eleventh Century', pp. 41-68. Dr Williams has also suggested that Brictric was the unnamed lord of the pre-Conques
t holders of the manors acquired by Walter and Gotshelm of Claville in Devon (fiefs 24-25). See also Clarke, }{\i\insrsid11419375 English Nobility}{\insrsid11419375 
, pp. 260-62, who excludes these and also the Brictric holdings on fiefs 24, 40, 42 and 50 from his list; he identifies the predecessor of Odo son of Gamalin as another Brictric (}{\i\insrsid11419375 ibidem}{\insrsid11419375 
, p. 265). Dr Williams, however, has shown that complex interrelationships between these and other fiefs make it probable that all had been held by the son of Algar (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab QUEEN MATILDA. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Wife of King William; she died in 1083.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 18,1\tab UPTON [LOVELL]. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 156, identifies only Upton Scudamore. But an analysis of the Tax Returns shows that an Upton lay in Heytesbury Hundred.}{
\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 18,2\tab LATTON AND EYSEY. It seems that to the 9 hides here should be joined 1 hide at }{\i\insrsid11419375 Lechetone }{\insrsid11419375 in Gloucestershire, to make a 10-hide unit; see GLS 71,1 Latton note; }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
Moore, 'Gloucestershire Section of Domesday Book, part I', pp. 126-27}{\insrsid11419375 . It is not certain if this 
hide was subsequently transferred to Wiltshire, thus involving an unrecorded boundary change, or whether the hide remained in Gloucestershire but was no longer regarded as part of Latton. It is possible, however, that Latton may have been included in Glou
cestershire by a misdivision of inquest material at an earlier stage, since the holder, Humphrey the cook, does not appear as a separate landholder in Wiltshire (although he is joint holder of Widhill (68,16) with Theobald).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 19\tab [LAND OF] THE CANONS OF LISIEUX. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 This heading applies only to the first entry in this chapter.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 19,1\tab [KINGSTON] DEVERILL. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Analysis of the Tax Returns shows that this Deverill lay in Mere Hundred. The 1066 holder, Edith, was possibly the queen. It is held }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 in pura elemosina }{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 from the king in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 743. See }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 173.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab [* QUEEN *] EDITH. See 19,1 Deverill note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 20,1\tab CONOCK. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 269, identifies Cowage Farm in Hilmarton. But analysis of the Tax Returns shows that it lay in 'Studfold' Hundred.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 20,2\tab "NECHENDUNE".}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Analysis of the Tax Returns shows that it lay in Amesbury Hundred. It is possibly Netton (SU1336), although the place-names are different.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab 30[s]. Probably }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 sol'}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  is omitted in error in the manuscript after }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 .xxx.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 . This also occurs with }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 .xxx.}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375  in 24,12.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 20,3\tab CLYFFE [PYPARD].}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Clive }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
refers to the long steep northern escarpment of the Marlborough Downs and must represent several settlements. Bushton (2,8), Clevancy (26,16) and possibly Broad Town (28,3) can be separately identified.}{\insrsid11419375 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab \tab Often no population is recorded in small holdings, but rarely in one of this size, so the omission may be accidental. See also 25,7;19. 48,2-3.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 20,5\tab LANGFORD. Later held by the Church at Mortain as }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Hangindelangeford }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 [Hanging Langford]; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, p. 742; and 37,8 Langford note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab \'bd MILL. See 37,8 for the other half.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 20,6\tab HARDING [* SON OF ALNOTH *]. See 12,1 Harding note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab THE ABBESS OF AMESBURY HELD 2 HIDES. This alienation is cross-referenced at 16,5; see 16,5 church note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 21\tab EARL ROGER. Roger of Montgommery, Earl of Shrewsbury.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 21,1\tab [CASTLE] EATON. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 See 66,1 Eaton note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab OSMUND <OF EATON>. A predecessor of Earl Roger of Shrewsbury, 'positively' identified by Round, }{\i\insrsid11419375 VCH Surrey}{\insrsid11419375 , p. 283; see also Clarke, }{\i\insrsid11419375 English Nobility}{\insrsid11419375 
, p. 329 (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 21,2\tab OSMUND <OF EATON>. See 21,1 Osmund note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 21,3\tab POULTON. Analysis of the Tax Returns shows that it lay in Cricklade Hundred. It was a detached}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 part of Wiltshire in Gloucestershire until the nineteenth century, 
being transferred to Gloucestershire in 1844. There is no certain Domesday site in Gloucestershire between Poulton and the Wiltshire boundary and it was possibly integral with the county in 1086.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 22\tab EARL HUGH. Hugh of Avranches, Earl of Chester and nephew of King William.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 22,1\tab WILLIAM [* MALBANK *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 22,2\tab HAIMO [* OF MASCY *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 22,3\tab EDWARD [* OF SALISBURY *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 22,4\tab HAIMO [* OF MASCY *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 22,5\tab WILLIAM [* MALBANK *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab OF THESE. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 De his}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 referring to the 2 hides paying tax. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 De ea}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 referring to }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 terra}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 the land in the plough assessment, or }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 De hac terra }{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 is the usual formula here.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 22,6\tab HAIMO [* OF MASCY *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 23\tab LAND WHICH WAS EARL AUBREY'S. Probably Aubrey of Coucy, formerly Earl of Northumbria. His estates were forfeited to the king when he resigned. But see Jones, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Domesday for Wiltshire}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 61, and Ellis, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 General Introduction to Domesday Book}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 i. p. 367, for a different identification, that is with Aubrey}{
\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 de Vere. However, as far as can be seen Aubrey de Vere is never referred to as }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 comes }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ('earl').}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 23,1\tab COMPTON. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 The holding is the Compton in Enford in view of the position of Aubrey's other holdings; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, p. 328. It is held with Winterslow and Ablington in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 746.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab HARDING [* SON OF ALNOTH *]. See 12,1 Harding note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 23,2\tab THE REST OF THE LAND. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Aliam terrain}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 This phrase is very common in the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Liber Exoniensis}{
\b\cf1\insrsid11419375 , }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
where the villagers' holding of land, as well as of ploughs, is regularly given. This is its only occurrence in Domesday Wiltshire and, apart perhaps from 24,3 and 67,13 the only occasion there where the villagers' holding is mentioned; see 24,3 hides not
e and 67,13 villagers note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab HARDING [* SON OF ALNOTH *]. See 12,1 Harding note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 23,3\tab HARDING [* SON OF ALNOTH *]. See 12,1 Harding note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 23,4\tab HARDING [* SON OF ALNOTH *]. See 12,1 Harding note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 23,5\tab HARDING [* SON OF ALNOTH *]. See 12,1 Harding note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 23,6\tab TYTHERINGTON. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, pp. 91-92, 168, only identifies Tytherton Lucas and East Tytherton (in Chippenham Hundred), though Tytherton and Tytherington have the same origin. This 
entry is flanked by Chitterne and Allington and all the lands of the 1066 holder Harding (23,1-6) seem to be in the same area.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab HARDING [* SON OF ALNOTH *]. See 12,1 Harding note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 23,7\tab ALLINGTON. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 The four hides taken from the Church of Amesbury identify this as Allington in Amesbury. See 16,3 Allington note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab ALSO IN THIS VILLAGE. The Phillimore printed edition has 'in this town', but the reference is clearly to Allington which has no urban characteristics.
\par \tab \tab In the manuscript there is a capital }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 I}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  for }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 In eadem villa}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 not reproduced by Farley.}{
\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab 4 HIDES. These 4 hides (at Allington) are listed in the fief of the Abbess of Amesbury at 16,3.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab [* EARL *] HAROLD. See 28,3 Harold note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }\pard\plain \s20\ql \fi-1080\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\aspalpha\faauto\rin0\lin1080\itap0\pararsid5329606 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\insrsid11419375 23,8\tab AZUR [* SON OF THORTH *]. See 23,10 Azur note.}{
\insrsid5329606 
\par }\pard\plain \ql \fi-1080\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin1080\itap0\pararsid5329606 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\cf1\insrsid11419375 23,9\tab 
PASTURE ... RIVER. The River Ebble, a tributary of the Wiltshire River Avon.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab AZUR [* SON OF THORTH *]. See 23,10 Azur note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }\pard\plain \s20\ql \fi-1080\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\aspalpha\faauto\rin0\lin1080\itap0\pararsid5329606 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\insrsid11419375 23,10\tab GUSSAGE [ST MICHAEL].}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
 That is, Gussage St Michael. This place lies in Dorset and it seems probable that it di
d so in 1086. Domesday gives Earl Aubrey no fief in Dorset and it seems likely that this land, at the end of his schedule, was transferred to the wrong county from a part of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Liber Exoniensis}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
 that does not survive but which was arranged, like extant portions,}{\insrsid11419375 
 by county within each fief, rather than by fief within each county. It is possible that an 'In Dorset' heading was missing or that the main scribe of Great Domesday failed to see it. The proof of this misplacement comes from }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
an analysis of the Dorset Tax Return which shows that this estate lay in}{\insrsid11419375  the Dorset hundred of Badbury; see }{\i\insrsid11419375 Feudal Aids}{\insrsid11419375 , ii. p. 14; and DOR 26,44 Gussage note. Compare 66,5 Gillingham note.}{
\insrsid5329606 
\par }\pard\plain \ql \fi-1080\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin1080\itap0\pararsid5329606 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\insrsid11419375 \tab AZUR [* SON OF THORTH *]. The Domesday forms of this }{
\i\insrsid11419375 T.R.E.}{\insrsid11419375  holder - }{\i\insrsid11419375 Azor}{\insrsid11419375 , }{\i\insrsid11419375 Azur}{\insrsid11419375 , }{\i\insrsid11419375 Azer}{\insrsid11419375 , }{\i\insrsid11419375 Atser}{\insrsid11419375 [}{
\i\insrsid11419375 us}{\insrsid11419375 ], }{\i\insrsid11419375 Azorius}{\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\insrsid11419375  Atsur}{\insrsid11419375 , }{\i\insrsid11419375 Assorin}{\insrsid11419375 [}{\i\insrsid11419375 us}{\insrsid11419375 
] - represent Old Danish/Old Swedish }{\i\insrsid11419375 Azur}{\insrsid11419375 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid11419375 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\insrsid11419375 
, pp. 170-71. In the Phillimore printed edition this name is generally rendered Azor, but Atsurr in Yorkshire and Lincolnshire. These have now been standardized as Azur. The Alecto edition has Azur.
\par }\pard\plain \s20\ql \fi-1080\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\aspalpha\faauto\rin0\lin1080\itap0\pararsid5329606 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\insrsid11419375 \tab \tab 
An Azur son of Thorth was a royal thane, named in BUK 1,7 and identifiable elsewhere as a predecessor of Earl Aubrey of Coucy. It is possible that he is the same individual
 as Azur <of Slindon> since their holdings in Wiltshire were intermingled with each other and both had very substantial manors in the county. There are, however, no tenurial or other associations to confirm a link. See also Clarke, }{\i\insrsid11419375 
English Nobility}{\insrsid11419375 , p. 253, who does not include SOM 6,2, a substantial manor held by Azur }{\i\insrsid11419375 filius Torodi}{\insrsid11419375  (Exon), probably the same individual despite the different form of the surname (JP).
\par \tab \tab However, Tengvik, }{\i\insrsid11419375 Old English Bynames}{\insrsid11419375 , p. 202, accepts the Exon form }{\i\insrsid11419375 filius Torodi}{\insrsid11419375  under Old Danish/Old Swedish }{\i\insrsid11419375 Thorald}{\insrsid11419375 .}{
\insrsid5329606 
\par }\pard\plain \ql \fi-1080\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin1080\itap0\pararsid5329606 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\cf1\insrsid11419375 24p\tab 1 [CROP OF] STANDING CORN, 162 ACRES. The Latin is }
{\i\f713\cf1\insrsid11419375 Annon\'ea .c.lxii. ac's}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 with }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 .i.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Bled }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 written above }{
\i\f713\cf1\insrsid11419375 Annon\'ea}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 . The }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 .i. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 may not be a number, but the abbreviation for }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 id est}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 making }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Bled}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  a gloss on }{\i\f713\cf1\insrsid11419375 annon\'ea}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 which
 can mean variously produce, corn-rents, or the grain itself. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Bled}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  stands for }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 bladi }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 (genitive),}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
'corn before the harvest'; see Ducange, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Glossarium}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , under }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 bladum}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 . }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Bladum}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
 is a Latinization of a Frankish or Gaulish word, Old French }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 blet}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , Modern French }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 bl\'e9}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 . }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 VCH Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, ii. p. 135 no. 163, interprets the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 .i.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  as }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 scilicet}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  ('namely'), and }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Domesday Geography of South-West England}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, p. 61, as }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 vel }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ('or').}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab REEVELAND. Its meaning is uncertain, perhaps land held by the sheriff during his term}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 of office; see Vinogradoff, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 English Society in the eleventh Century}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 pp. 372-73.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab FROM HIS OWN. Because of its gender, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 De suo }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 cannot grammatically refer to }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 firma}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ('revenue'); it probably}{\insrsid11419375  }{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 means Edward's estates and resources, generally.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 24\tab LAND OF THE SAME EDWARD OF SALISBURY. Edward the sheriff's heirs were the Earls of Salisbury.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 24,1\tab COTTAGERS. [***]. There is a gap in the manuscript of about nine letters after the Cottagers, probably for the later addition of the villagers' ploughs, though there is no }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 rq' }{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 (for }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 require}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 'enquire') in the margin, as in 2,11. 25,2 and 67,11.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 24,2\tab ALTON [BARNES]. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Edward's heirs hold Alton }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Berners}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ii. p. 274b.}{\insrsid5329606 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 24,3\tab 2 HIDES AND 1 VIRGATE. Perhaps a rare instance of the villagers' land being given, but it is more likely that the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 tenent' }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
refers only to the 2 Frenchmen, as in 27,3. See 23,2 land note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 24,5\tab HUNDRED OF HIGHWORTH [AT] LUS HILL. The scribe mistakenly wrote the hundred name and the place-name as one word, instead of two with a preposition between them.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 24,6\tab HERVEY [* OF WILTON *]. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 That is, Hervey of Wilton; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 VCH Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ii. pp. 75, 106.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 24,7\tab SHREWTON. The meaning is 'sheriff's }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 tun}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 '; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 236. Only one of the three entries in}{
\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 this chapter (24,7;10;35) need be Shrewton, the others being unidentified Winterbourne (River Till) holdings. The Earl of Salisbury also held }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Parva Winterburn}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 now Asserton in Berwick St James (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , pp. 709, 721), and part of Maddington (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 721).}{
\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 24,9\tab IN THE SAME VILLAGE. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 The Phillimore printed edition has 'in the same town', but the reference is clearly to Winterbourne Stoke which has no urban characteristics.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab WIFE ALSO HOLDS 1 \'bd HIDES. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 hid' dimid'}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Either the scribe omitted }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 7}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375  in error at the end of the line, or, possibly, the two words were mistakenly transposed, '\'bd hide' being intended; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 VCH Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ii. p. 136 no. 172; Jones, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Domesday for Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 66. There are a number of cases (for example, 24,36), however, where the number }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 i }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 has been omitted before }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 
hida 7 dim'}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 .}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 24,10\tab SHREWTON. For the identity, see 24,7 Shrewton note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 24,11\tab ORCHESTON. That is, Orcheston St Mary, earlier Orcheston }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Bovyle}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 . }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Henricus de Bovill' }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 held from the Earl of Salisbury in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 721; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 234.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 24,12\tab 30[s]. See 20,2 30[s] note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 24,13\tab IN THE MANUSCRIPT, in the right margin next to the first two lines of this entry, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 TODEWORTHE }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 is written in large and ornate capitals in a thirteenth-century hand; the final }
{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 E}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  is fainter than the other letters and is not reproduced in the Ordnance Survey facsimile. Farley did not reproduce it.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 24,14\tab [NORTH] }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 TIDWORTH. Croc also held South Tidworth in Hampshire (HAM 60,1). See 4,1 Tidworth note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab 1 VIRGATE OF LAND. The 1 virgate which Croc proved should belong to him is mentioned in his holding in North Tidworth (68,14) as being held by Edward the sheriff; Croc held 3 other virgates there.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 24,18\tab [HILL] DEVERILL. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 This is held by the Earls of Salisbury as }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Hulledeverel }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 in}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 728.}{
\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 24,19\tab 10 PLOUGHS. The manuscript has }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 x. . car' }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 with a gap of about two letters between the full-stops, due to an erasure. It would seem that originally a number larger than }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 x }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 had been written in error. Farley did not reproduce the gap.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab PASTURE, 12 ACRES. Farley misprinted '20 acres'.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab ENGLISHMEN. Called 'thanes' in 68,23.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab PROVED. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Diratiocinati sunt }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 is more probably deponent (compare Classical Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 ratiocinari}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 )}{\insrsid11419375  }{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 than passive, despite the active }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 diratiocinavit }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 in 24,14. The deponent form is also found}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 in 24,42. In the Middle Ages there was some confu
sion between the deponent and the}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 active forms of a verb, both forms occurring together, as here.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab WILLIAM OF PICQUIGNY. The same person as William, son of Ansculf of Picquigny. He came from Picquigny in}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Picardy. He was an important man in the Midlands and was lord of Dudley Castle.}
{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 See 68,22-23.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 24,20\tab SOMERFORD. The remaining parts of the mill are accounted for by 67,22-23;25 which are probably at the same Somerford.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab SHEERWOLD <OF GOTHERS>. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 The name Sheerwold occurs 14 times in Domesday Book or 
Exon., four times as the predecessor of the Count of Mortain in Cornwall (5,24,10), Dorset (DOR 26,14;54), and Somerset (SOM 19,1). In 1086 he continued to hold Gothers from the Count. The Mortain manor in Somerset is adjacent to William of Mohun's manor 
o
f Leigh, held by Sheerwold in 1066; and the two Devon manors of Sheerwold held by Haimeric of Arques and Odo son of Gamelin in 1086 lay on the route from Gothers to the Mortain manors in Somerset and Dorset. It seems likely that all these properties had b
e
en held by one individual in 1066. There are no apparent links with the remaining holdings in Somerset, Gloucestershire and Wiltshire; but given the rarity of the name and its restricted distribution, it is possible that all were held by the same individu
al in 1066. }{\insrsid11419375 See also Keats-Rohan, }{\i\insrsid11419375 Domesday People}{\insrsid11419375 , p. 421 (JP).
\par \tab \tab Keats-Rohan (}{\i\insrsid11419375 ibidem}{\insrsid11419375 ) provides only one reference to plain 'Sireuuold, an English tenant of Robert of Mortain in Domesday Cornwall', folio 124d, which is CON 5,24,10, Gothers.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 24,21\tab BLUNSDON. The Salisbury holding is 'Hanging Blunsdon' (that is, Broad Blunsdon) in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 720; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 , pp. 30-31.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 24,22\tab AZUR <OF SLINDON>. On the name Azur, see 23,10 Azur note.
\par \tab \tab Azur <of Slinden> was one of the wea
lthiest thanes in southern England, his large estate centred in Sussex but spreading as far afield as Gloucestershire. The bulk had been held directly from King Edward though several holdings were held from Earls Godwin and Harold. The division of Sussex 
i
nto Rapes which cut across Anglo-Saxon tenurial arrangements make it impossible to be certain that every one of the Sussex holdings belonged to the same Azur; but the fact that he held from both the King and the earls in the three Rapes where most of his 
h
oldings lay, and that he had large manors in all of them, indicate the majority if not all of these holdings were his. The key to his identification in Gloucestershire, Wiltshire, and Surrey, and the link between these counties and his Sussex manors, is p
r
ovided by a Gloucestershire entry (GLS 1,63) which reveals that Azur sold this manor to the Godwinsons and that it was held illegally in 1086 by Edward of Salisbury, on whom Azur's estates in Wiltshire and some in Surrey devolved. With one exception, the 
remaining holdings in Surrey, all substantial, were acquired by Richard of Tonbridge; they all lay between Edward of Salisbury's two manors and it is likely they had belonged to same individual. The remaining manor (SUR 8,30), valued at \'a3
6, had been granted
 by Azur to Chertsey Abbey for his soul's sake, the act of a wealthy man. Finally, the three Hampshire properties acquired by Hugh of Port were freehold properties of substance. It may be coincidental but it is apparent that all the tenants-in-chief who s
hared Azur's holdings held official positions, as sheriffs or lords of liberties. See also Williams, }{\i\insrsid11419375 English and the Norman Conquest}{\insrsid11419375 
, pp. 105-106 (who argues that Edward's predecessor may have been a relative of his), and Clarke, }{\i\insrsid11419375 English Nobility}{\insrsid11419375 , pp. 255-57 (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 24,24\tab WULFWYNN [* OF CRESLOW *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 24,27\tab POOLE [KEYNES]. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 It is held by the Earl of Salisbury in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , pp. 709, 722. See Jones, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Domesday for Wiltshire}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 229;}{\insrsid11419375  }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 VCH Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ii. p. 107 note 31. It was transferred to Gloucestershire in 1897.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab WULFWYNN [* OF CRESLOW *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 24,29\tab MIDDLETON. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 349, identifies Milton Lilbourne, but the Earl of Salisbury's}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Middleton in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 719, is clearly different from the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Middelton }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 held by Walter}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 de Lillebon in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 
Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , pp. 714, 746. See 48,5 Middleton note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 24,31\tab LANGLEY [BURRELL]. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 It is held by Thomas }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Burel}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 720, probably a}{\insrsid11419375  }{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 descendent of the 1086 holder. See }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 105.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 24,32\tab THE FOURTH PART OF A MILL. At 26,22 there are '2 parts of a mill which pay 40d'. Ther
e is no other mention of a quarter of a mill under other holdings in Tytherton or nearby places; either it is missing (possibly from 48,9: Tytherton Kellaways) or the '2 parts' represent three-quarters of a mill, or perhaps the reading should be }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Ibi tercia pars }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 for }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Ibi quarta pars}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 The manuscript has a capital }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 I}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375  for }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Ibi}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 which Farley did not reproduce.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 24,34\tab AZUR <OF SLINDON>. On his name, see 23,10 Azur note. On the identification, see 24,22 Azur note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab BEFORE 1066 AND [***]. In the manuscript there is an }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 7}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  after }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 T.R.E.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
omitted by Farley, with a gap of about four letters following it, then another gap of about five letters at the beginning of the next line before }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Terra est}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
The gaps are due to erasures, but do not seem to be large enough for words such as }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 pro tanto geldb' }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ('it paid tax for as much'), which one would}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
expect here; see 24,36-37.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 24,35\tab SHREWTON. For the identity, see 24,7 Shrewton note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 24,38\tab 
BALDWIN [* SON OF HERLEWIN *]. Baldwin's father, Herlewin, came to England even before the reign of Edward the Confessor. Baldwin himself had a substantial holding before the Conquest and survived to hold under the Conqueror. The bulk of his holdings can 
b
e established from his distinctive pre-Conquest name and the links which this establishes. His holdings in 1086 were significantly different from those in 1066, only two being in his hands at both dates (BUK 17,15;24). Broadly speaking, his pre-Conquest l
a
nds were re-distributed to Hugh of Grandmesnil and William son of Ansculf, with Miles Crispin obtaining three holdings and several other tenants-in-chief a manor apiece. William son of Ansculf then re-endowed him with the bulk of his post-Conquest fee. Se
e Lewis, 'The French in England before the Norman Conquest', and Clarke, }{\i\insrsid11419375 English Nobility}{\insrsid11419375 , pp. 257-58; both lists include only Baldwin's pre-Conquest holdings (JP).
\par \tab \tab This is the only occurrence of the name Baldwin in Domesday Wiltshire.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 24,39\tab AIULF [* THE CHAMBERLAIN *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 24,40\tab PASTURE FOR 50 SHEEP. The only mention of sheep in Domesday Wiltshire.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 24,41\tab WINTERBOURNE [EARLS].}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  Named after the Earls of Salisbury; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , pp. 383-84.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab WULFWYNN [* OF CRESLOW *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 24,42\tab LANGFORD. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 That is, Little Langford, see 7,12 Langford note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab AZUR <OF SLINDON>. On his name, see 23,10 Azur note. On his identification, see 24,22 Azur note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab ADJUDGE. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Diratiocinantur}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 deponent; see 24,19 proved note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab CHURCH OF GLASTONBURY. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 This hide is referred to in 7,13 as rightly belonging to the abbey.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 25\tab LAND OF ARNULF OF HESDIN.}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Many of Arnulf's holdings passed to Patrick de Chaworth.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 25,1\tab LAND FOR 16 PLOUGHS. Written in the left margin. Farley misprinted '15 ploughs'.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 25,2\tab THE BISHOP OF SALISBURY'S MANOR OF POTTERNE BEFORE 1066. See 3,1. This is anachronistic; there was not in fact a Bishop of}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Salisbury itself until 1078; see 3,1 bishop note.}{
\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab BISHOP OSMUND [* OF SALISBURY *]. See 1,23h Osmund note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab [***] 3 FURLONGS. There is a gap of about seven letters in the manuscript with }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 r}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  (for }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 require}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\insrsid11419375  }{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 'enquire') in the left margin to remind the scribe to find out whether pasture or woodland was so described; the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 r}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  is not reproduced by Farley or the Ordnance Survey facsimile. It
 is interesting}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 to note that for two out of the three entries for Potterne (see 67,11) the scribe was unsure}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
of the nature of part of the land whose dimensions he recorded.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 25,3\tab CHEVERELL. Probably Little Cheverell; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 VCH Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , x. p. 54.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 25,4\tab EDRIC <OF OLDBURY>. Edric was the predecessor of Arnulf of Hesdin in five counties, survived by his wife who was allowed to retain two holdings in Wiltshire as a tenant of Arnulf
, with a house in Malmesbury. Edric had also held Linkenholt (HAM 7,1), adjacent to his manor at Combe, which Arnulf had granted to St Peter's of Gloucester. The name Edric is so common that it is probable that he had held other manors in those counties a
nd possibly elsewhere. See also Clarke, }{\i\insrsid11419375 English Nobility}{\insrsid11419375 , p. 305 (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 25,5\tab EDRIC [* OF OLDBURY *]'S WIFE. See 25,4 Edric note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 25,6\tab PEWSEY. This entry is lined through in black for deletion because it had appeared already as part of 10,3. See 10,3 hides note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 25,7\tab BENZELIN [* THE ARCHDEACON *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab STANDEN. That is, the Standen in Chute, earlier Standen Chaworth; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , pp. 716, 746; }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 341.

\par \tab \tab On the lack of population, see 20,3 Clyffe note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 25,8\tab CHALFIELD. Later in Bradford Hundred, but an analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in Melksham Hundred.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab WALTHEOF <OF CHALFIELD>. According to von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid11419375 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\insrsid11419375 , p. 403 note 1, all the instances of Waltheof in Domesday refer to the earl.
\par \tab \tab This holding, however, is so isolated from the remainder of the earl's holdings that it may have been held by a different man (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 25,9\tab RECORDED. See 1,5 recorded note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab ABOVE. Referring to the manor of Chalfield (25,8).}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 25,11\tab CLYFFE [PYPARD].}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  does not identify this }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Sclive }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 which is a Norman-French form for }
{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Clive}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 .}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 25,12\tab "BICHENEHILDE".}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Jones, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Domesday for Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, p. 198, identified this place and "Bechenehilde" (25,18) with Beacon Hill in Hilmarton. This identification is noticed in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 268, where the derivation of Domesday }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Bichen-}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  Bechen-}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 from Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 beacon}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  becn }{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 is perhaps too readily supposed: Old English,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  becen }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ('growing with beeches') is also possible. The Domesday name is not the same as the later one, although the place may be the same.}{
\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 25,13\tab 7 COTTAGERS. See M3 Cottagers note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 25,15\tab WULFWARD [* WHITE *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 25,18\tab "BECHENEHILDE". For the name, see 25,12 "Bichenehilde" note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 25,19\tab "CHENEBUILD".}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 On the lack of population, see 20,3 Clyffe note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 25,20\tab CHEDGLOW. For another part, see 67,51 and 67,51 Chedglow note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 25,22\tab DEVERILL. Analysis of the Tax Returns for Heytesbury Hundred suggests that this Deverill is the same as t
hose of 67,52 and 68,28. There, Urso, Aubrey and Edgar who hold Deverill in Domesday are said to have withheld the tax from one hide together with Richard and Durand.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 25,23\tab UPTON [SCUDAMORE].}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  This is the same place as the Upton of 32,17, of which Arnulf wrongfully holds \'bd hide. Analysis of the Tax Returns shows that both entries lay in Warminister Hundred.}{
\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab "TOUS". }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 For possible names represented by Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Tous}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , see }{\insrsid11419375 von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid11419375 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book
}{\insrsid11419375 , p. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 388.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab ARNULF HOLDS \'bd HIDE OF THE LAND OF WILLIAM OF EU. This is also mentioned under Upton Scudamore in William of Eu's fief (32,17).}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab AS MUCH AS IS WORTH. This holding was probably from the king's land at nearby}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Warminster, which was not hidated (see 1,4), hence the unusual expression here.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 25,24\tab "NUBOLD" [* HUBOLD *]. The Domesday form }{\i\insrsid11419375 Nubold'}{\insrsid11419375  is probably a scribal error for }{\i\insrsid11419375 Hubold'}{\insrsid11419375 , as a }{\i\insrsid11419375 Hubold'}{\insrsid11419375 
 is a tenant of Arnulf in 25,28, and there is no evidence of a name that could be represented by }{\i\insrsid11419375 Nubold'}{\insrsid11419375 
. It has therefore been decided to retain the Domesday form for the present edition. The Alecto edition has Nubold. Hubold is an Old German name: Forssner, }{\i\insrsid11419375 Continental-Germanic Personal Names}{\insrsid11419375 , p. 155.}{
\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab `WINTERBOURNE'. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Patrick de Chaworth held }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Berwyke}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  [Berwick St James]}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 in 'Dolesfield' Hundred in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ii. p. 254a; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 742. This is possibly Arnulf's Winterbourne.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab EDRIC [* OF OLDBURY *]. See 25,4 Edric note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 25,26\tab EASTON [PIERCY]. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Later in Chippenham Hundred, but an analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in Thorngrove Hundred.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 25,27\tab JUDICAEL [* THE PRIEST *]. Probably a canon of Cherbourg: Keats-Rohan, }{\i\insrsid11419375 Domesday People}{\insrsid11419375 , p. 282 (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab YATTON [KEYNELL].}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  The Domesday form is }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Etone}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 which }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 45, identifies with Water Eaton, accepting only }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Getone }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 (32,14) as Yatton. However, Ekwall, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Dictionary of English Placenames}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 accepts }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Etone }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 as a precursor of Yatton. The place is probably the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Gatton }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 
Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 716, by Henry }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Chaynel}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  from Patrick de Chaworth. See 6,1 Yatton note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 25,28\tab HUBOLD. On this name, see 25,24 Hubold note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 26\tab LAND OF ALFRED OF MARLBOROUGH. Alfred's holdings were later in the hands of Robert Tregoze.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 26,1\tab ALLINGTON. Analysis of the Tax Returns shows that it lay in 'Studfold' Hundred. It is held with All Cannings from Robert Tregoze in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 725.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 

\par }\pard\plain \s20\ql \fi-1080\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\aspalpha\faauto\rin0\lin1080\itap0\pararsid5329606 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\insrsid11419375 \tab KARLI <OF NORTON>. See 26,15 Karli note.}{\insrsid5329606 

\par }\pard\plain \ql \fi-1080\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin1080\itap0\pararsid5329606 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\insrsid11419375 26,2\tab KARLI <OF NORTON>. See 26,15 Karli note.}{
\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 26,3\tab PASTURE, 6; WOODLAND, 6. Probably }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 acrae }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 is to be understood in both cases.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab KARLI <OF NORTON>. See 26,15 Karli note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 26,4\tab 2 PLOUGHS. In the manuscript there is a gap of about two letters due to an erasure between }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 ii }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 car}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ',}{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 which Farley did not reproduce.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab KARLI <OF NORTON>. See 26,15 Karli note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 26,5\tab KARLI <OF NORTON>. See 26,15 Karli note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 26,6\tab LAND. }{\i\f720\cf1\insrsid11419375 T'r\'e2 }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 =terram}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
accusative) in the manuscript, a mistake for the usual }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 t'ra }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 (= }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 terra}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 nominative).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab KARLI <OF NORTON>. See 26,15 Karli note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 26,7\tab LYDIARD [TREGOZE].}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  Analysis of the Tax Returns shows that it lay in Blagrove Hundred; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 712.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab KARLI <OF NORTON>. See 26,15 Karli note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 26,8\tab KARLI <OF NORTON>. See 26,15 Karli note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 26,9\tab ALBERT [* OF LORRAINE *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab PASTURE, \'bd LEAGUE. The manuscript and Farley have the abbreviation mark over }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 leu }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 =leuua}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  or}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  leuca}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 'league'), but it is not reproduced in the Ordnance Survey facsimile.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab KARLI <OF NORTON>. See 26,15 Karli note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 26,10\tab KARLI <OF NORTON>. See 26,15 Karli note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 26,11\tab UPTON [SCUDAMORE]. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Together with a 'Norton' [Norton Bavant, 26,12], this Upton is held}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 by Geoffrey (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Galfridus}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 )}{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  d'Escudamore}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  from Robert Tregoze in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , pp. 712, 725. Analysis of the Tax Returns shows that both lay in Warminster Hundred.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab KARLI <OF NORTON>. See 26,15 Karli note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 26,12\tab NORTON [BAVANT].}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  See 26,11 Upton note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab KARLI <OF NORTON>. See 26,15 Karli note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 26,13\tab VALUE \'a38. Written in darker ink at the end of 26,12 with transposition signs to indicate its correct place.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab KARLI <OF NORTON>. See 26,15 Karli note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 26,14\tab FIFIELD [BAVANT]. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 The Fifield in Chalke Hundred is held from John Tregoze in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ii. p.}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 249a.}{
\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab KARLI <OF NORTON>. See 26,15 Karli note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }\pard\plain \s20\ql \fi-1080\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\aspalpha\faauto\rin0\lin1080\itap0\pararsid5329606 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\insrsid11419375 26,15\tab 
KARLI <OF NORTON>. Karli was an Anglo-Saxon magnate with estates valued at almost \'a3150, which would place
 him among the twenty wealthiest landowners after the earls. Most of his estates were granted to Alfred of Marlborough, who succeeded him in five counties. Elsewhere, the Karli who held estates from King Edward in Sussex and Berkshire may well be the same
 
man since these are the only other holdings in the south of England held by a Karli and three of them were of sufficient status for a magnate. In Kent, two sons of Karli, Godric and Godwin, had held valuable manors which were acquired by Bishop Odo. It se
ems likely that Karli <of Norton> was their father. See also Clarke, }{\i\insrsid11419375 English Nobility}{\insrsid11419375 , pp. 5, 317-18, who also attributes all the holdings in the south of England to this individual (JP).
\par \tab \tab No other lands held by Karli are recorded in Domesday Wiltshire.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }\pard\plain \ql \fi-1080\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin1080\itap0\pararsid5329606 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab ALL THE ABOVE LANDS. That is, 26,1-15.}{
\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 26,16\tab CLEVANCY. See }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 268; }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 VCH Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ii. p. 142 no. 248; and 20,3 Clyffe note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 26,17\tab BEFORE 1066. As }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 T.R.E. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 is written between }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 geldb' }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Sigar}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 with no punctuation or }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 7}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , it could equally well be translated 'they paid tax for as much before 1066. Sigar and Carlman held them'; so Jones, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Domesday for Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 83. This also occurs in 26,20. 27,27 and 37,9-10.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 26,18\tab SOMERFORD. John Maltravers holds from Robert Tregoze in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 712. Somerford}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Maltravers is Great Somerford: }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 73. See 27,10 Somerford note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 26,19\tab DURAND OF GLOUCESTER. See 28,10 and 28,10 Durand note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab TESTIFY. Unless it is a scribal error, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 testant' }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 =testantur}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
is more likely to be deponent (as it is in Classical Latin) than passive. See 24,19 proved note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 26,20\tab HORNINGSHAM. It is held from Robert Tregoze as }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Parva Horningesham }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 738.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab BEFORE 1066. See 26,17 before note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 26,21\tab NICHOLAS [* THE BOWMAN *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 26,22\tab TYTHERTON. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 That is, West Tytherton. This place was formerly known as Tytherton Lucas: Adam Lucas holds}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 from Robert Tregoze in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 
Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , pp. 713, 725; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , pp. 91-92.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab 2 PARTS OF A MILL. Another part of the mill is at 24,32; see 24,32 mill note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 27\tab LAND OF HUMPHREY DE L'ISLE. Many of Humphrey's holdings passed to the Dunstanville family.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 27,2\tab COMPTON [BASSETT]. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 This Compton is held by Fulco Bassett from Walter de Dunstanville in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 713. See 27,2 mills note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab THE THIRD PART OF 2 MILLS. The third part of two mills at 10s is complemented by the same amounts at 32,3 and 67,63 which are therefore the same Compton.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 27,7\tab WROUGHTON. It is held from the Dunstanvilles as }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Uverewereston }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 (= Over Wroughton)}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 726. For 'Nether Wroughton', see 2,7 Wroughton note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 27,8\tab WULFWIN <OF SALTHROP>. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
The name Wulfwin occurs ten times in the south-western counties and may represent five or six individuals. This isolated Wiltshire property, some 50 miles from any other Wulfwin, may have been the sole property of this Wulfwin (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 27,10\tab SOMERFORD. That is, Great Somerford. John Maltravers holds from the Dunstanvilles in}{\insrsid11419375  }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , pp. 713, 726. See 26,18 Somerford note.}{
\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab AND 7 SMALLHOLDERS. Written in the left margin, but with no signs to show its correct place in the text.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 27,12\tab BLUNSDON. This Blunsdon is held as }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Churibluntesdon}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  [that is, 'Church Blunsdon']}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 by Walter de Dunstanville in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 726. 'Church Blunsdon' is Blunsdon St Andrew; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , pp. 30-31.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 27,13\tab GROUNDWELL. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 31, does not identify Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Grendewelle}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , but this is probably the }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Grundevell }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 held from Walter de Dunstanville in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 726; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 VCH Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ii. p. 144 no. 269.}{
\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab ORDWULF <OF GROUNDWELL>. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
The name Ordwulf occurs on some 30 holdings and may represent three or four individuals. The Ordwulf of Groundwell has no apparent links with the Ordwulfs in Berkshire and the south-west though the possibility cannot be entirely precluded (JP).}{
\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 27,14\tab ASHTON [GIFFORD]. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 164, does not identify this Aston, but Elias Giffard held }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Aston }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
from the Dunstanvilles in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 726.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab \'bd MILL. The \'bd mill here at 6s 3d is completed by the fourth parts at 3s and 3s 1 \'bd d at Codford (32,10. 48,6).}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 27,15\tab BATHAMPTON. This entry and the next (27,16) are both named from the River Wylye (Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Wili}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Wilrenone}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, respectively). Two tenants of Walter de Dunstanville held at }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Bathamewily }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, pp. 713, 726), but the Dunstanvilles also held Wylye to which one of these entries could refer. See 13,11 Wylye note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 27,16\tab BATHAMPTON. On the identification, see 27,15 Bathampton note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 27,17\tab A SMALL WOOD. On the meaning of }{\i\insrsid11419375 silua parua}{\insrsid11419375  elsewhere in Great Domesday, see SHR 4,1,4 wood note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 27,18\tab WINTERBOURNE [BASSETT].}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  This Winterbourne was given by Alan de Dunstanville to Alan Bassett; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 309; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 VCH Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ii. p. 145 no. 274.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 27,19\tab POULTON.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  Analysis of the Tax Returns shows that it lay in 'Selkley' Hundred. It was later transferred to Gloucestershire; see 21,3 Poulton note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 27,20\tab HAMPTON. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 On the location, see 43,1 Moredon note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 27,21\tab LAND [FOR *** PLOUGHS]. In the manuscript there is a gap of about four letters, presumably for the scribe to fill in the rest of the plough estimate when available.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 27,25\tab HURDCOTT. Analysis of the Tax Returns shows that it lay in 'Cadworth' Hundred. See 37,16 Hurdcott note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 27,26\tab 'FRUSTFIELD'. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 386, does not identify Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Fistesferie }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
with Frustfield, but an analysis of the Tax Returns shows that it lay in 'Frustfield' Hundred. This important village is lost, surviving only in the hundred name. However, the Dunstanvilles held Whelpley in Whiteparish (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 
Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , pp. 713, 745) which may represent all or part of the present holding; see Jones, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Domesday for Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 216. See also 67,35 Alderstone note for another part.}{
\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab HELD. In the manuscript and Farley it is }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 ten'uit}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ; the scribe seems to have written }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 ten' }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 (the usual abbreviation for }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 tenet}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 'holds') first, and then added }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 uit }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 and not removed the abbreviation mark.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 27,27\tab BEFORE 1066. See 26,17 before note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab SAEWOLD <OF MILFORD>. The Domesday of forms of this name - }{\i\insrsid11419375 Sauuold}{\insrsid11419375 [}{\i\insrsid11419375 us}{\insrsid11419375 ], }{\i\insrsid11419375 Sauuold}{\insrsid11419375 , }{\i\insrsid11419375 Seuuold}{
\insrsid11419375  - represent Old English }{\i\insrsid11419375 S\'e6weald}{\insrsid11419375 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid11419375 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\insrsid11419375 , p. 354. JRM preferred the second element -wold}{
\i\insrsid11419375  }{\insrsid11419375 for Old English}{\i\insrsid11419375  -weald}{\insrsid11419375  as it reflected the spelling of the Domesday forms. The Alecto edition has S\'e6weald. This is the only occurrence of this name in Domesday Wiltshire.

\par \tab \tab Apart from Abbot Saewold, whose name occurs only in the }{\i\insrsid11419375 Liber Exoniensis}{\insrsid11419375  (see SOM 7,15 land note), the name Saewold occurs on 17 holdings in Domesday Book, probably representing six i
ndividuals. The Saewold in the present entry had no namesakes sufficiently close to be plausibly linked to him (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab IN THE KING'S FOREST. The forest is Clarendon. See 13,20 forest note and 67,79 forest note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 28\tab LAND OF MILES CRISPIN. Miles' holdings became part of the honour of Wallingford.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 28,1\tab WOOTTON [BASSETT]. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 It was later in 'Kingsbridge' Hundred, but an analysis of the Tax Returns shows this holding lay in Blagrove Hundred.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 28,2\tab 10 COTTAGERS. See M3 Cottagers note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 28,3\tab CLYFFE [PYPARD].}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  The honour of Wallingford holdings were at }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Brodeton }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 [Broad Town}{\insrsid11419375 , }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ST0977] in }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , pp. 315, 727. See }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 VCH Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ix. p. 28; and 20,3 Clyffe note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab [* EARL *] HAROLD. The name Harold is one of the most common in Domesday Boo
k, occurring over 700 times; but it probably represents fewer than 20 individuals, of whom Earl Harold Godwinson is overwhelmingly the most significant, Harold son of Earl Ralph of Hereford being the only other individual of any consequence. In a large nu
m
ber of cases, unfortunately, the scribe has not given Harold his title. In Essex, Norfolk and Suffolk, for instance, he is described as earl only once in each county (ESS B3k. NFK 3,2. SUF 68,1) though he undoubtedly held a large number of estates in all 
t
hree, possibly all but two of those recorded in the three counties. However, there are surprisingly few cases where there is real cause for uncertainty about identifying the earl: the royal estates, the larger manors, the lordship over men, his territoria
l
 predominance in some areas, association with members of his family, and relationships between estates, serve to distinguish him in the majority of cases; but see BUK 17,22 Harold note. Ann Williams, 'Land and Power', pp. 171-87, 230-34, discusses Harold'
s estates and those of his men; and Clarke, }{\i\insrsid11419375 English Nobility}{\insrsid11419375 
, pp. 164-91, lists them. Clarke tends to omit the dependencies where Harold is not explicitly named, or holdings named only in satellite texts (CON 4,2. KEN 2,5;41;43). He has also omitted the fol
lowing: BUK 3a,5. 26,11. 30,1. CHS 8,41. ESS 1,23. HEF 1,56. 17,2. HRT 1,15. 5,5. HUN 13,1-3. NFK 8,33. 9,178; 233. 20,8;19;24;31. 21,16;22;33-34. 22,2-8. 26,3. NTT 3,1-3. OXF 58,30. SUF 1,119. 36,3;5-7;15. 38,21. 39,17. 67,12;17. 76,6;20;23. SUR 26,1. WI
L 18,2. 41,1; and the entries for GLS 30,1 and 50,3 have been confused (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 28,4\tab CLYFFE [PYPARD]. See 28,3 Clyffe note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 28,6\tab REGINALD.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Rainald }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 in manuscript; Farley misprinted }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Rainbald}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 .}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 28,7\tab DRAYCOT [FOLIAT].}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , pp. 69-70, identifies Draycot Cerne, but Sampson Foliot holds}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
from the honour of Wallingford in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  727.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 28,9\tab REGINALD [* CNUT *]. In }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 the Tax Returns for "Scipa" Hundred he is Reginald Cnut (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 canut}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 us}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ]).}{
\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab WIGOT [* OF WALLINGFORD *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab LORDSHIP [***]. In the manuscript there is a gap of about seven letters after this; it was probably intended for}{\b\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 the ploughs in lordship when their number was available.}{
\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 28,10\tab 
6 OXEN, WHICH ARE THERE, PLOUGHING. See 13,3 oxen note. As 8 oxen normally formed a plough-team, perhaps 2 were borrowed from a neighbouring manor. As to whether there were smaller teams in the south-west, see Lennard, 'Domesday Plough-Teams';}{
\insrsid11419375  Lennard, 'Domesday }{\i\insrsid11419375 Caruca}{\insrsid11419375 '; }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Finberg, 'Domesday Plough-Team'.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab 1 COTTAGER AND 1 SLAVE. The manuscript has }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 i}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  cotar}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 ius}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 
 7 uno seruo}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Either this is a mistake for ... }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 7 unus seruus }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 or for ... }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 cum uno seruo}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 .}{
\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab MEADOW, 1 ACRE AND 1 \'bd VIRGATES. Either the 1 \'bd virgates are part of the meadow's measurement or }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 pastura }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 was omitted in error before it.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab DURAND [* OF GLOUCESTER *]. Durand o}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 f Gloucester; see 26,19. Edward is stated there to have held this \'bd virgate before 1066. Perhaps Siward held it from Edward (or 
vice versa), or the scribe misread; one of the names in the returns, or the return was itself faulty.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 28,12\tab WIGOT [* OF WALLINGFORD *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 29\tab LAND OF GILBERT OF BRETTEVILLE.}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Some of Gilbert's holdings were in the hands of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Comitissa de Insula}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  in the time of Edward I.}
{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 29,2\tab BINCKNOLL. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 This is not identified by }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, p. 296, but an analysis of the Tax Returns shows that a holding of Gilbert is needed for Blagrove Hundred. Bincknoll was in that hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, ii. pp. 243b, 244a, later in 'Selkley' Hundred.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 29,5\tab OF THESE 11 HIDES, 1 IS IN THORNHILL. See 68,23 for a cross-reference to this hide.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab IT LAY. Latin }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 q}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 ua}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 e}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
referring to the hide, not Thornhill.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 29,7\tab [BROAD] HINTON. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 It is held by the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Comitissa de Insula}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  in 'Selkley' Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, ii. p. 269b.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 29,8\tab BECKHAMPTON. The }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Comitissa de Insula}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  holds }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Batha'pton }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Stanmere }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
[Stanmore, 29,9] in 'Selkley' Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ii. p. 269b. See }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , vi. p. 539; Jones, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Domesday for Wiltshire}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 , pp. 197, 232. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 227, identifies Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Bachentune}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  with Bathampton (27,15-16).}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 29,9\tab STANMORE. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 For the descent, see 29,8 Beckhampton note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 30,2\tab LAND [FOR *** PLOUGHS]. There is a gap of about four letters in the manuscript after }{\i\f720\cf1\insrsid11419375 T'ra \'e7}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ; 4 ploughs may have been intended, as the summary in the }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Liber Exoniensis }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 (Exon folio 531a1) gives the total number of assessed ploughs in Durand's Wiltshire holding as 24, and in Domesday they total 20 apart from the number omitted here.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab \'bd [HIDE]. There is a gap of about four letters in the manuscript due to an erasure; }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 hida }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 was probably intended.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 30,3\tab HE ALSO. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Grammatically }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Idem }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 refers to Roger (30,2), but as }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 de D}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 urando}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 has been omitted (perhaps in error), Durand may have held these 1 \'bd hides himself. The summary of Durand's holdings in Wiltshire in the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Liber Exoniensis }{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 (Exon folio 531a1) is no help because the 1 \'bd hides would be counted as part of Durand's total holding whether Roger held from him or not.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 30,5\tab ASHLEY. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 It was transferred to Gloucestershire in 1930.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab A MAN-AT-ARMS ... CLAIMS 1 VIRGATE. Miles Crispin holds the adjacent Chedglow (28,10), on which the holding of this man-at-arms may have encroached.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 31\tab WALTER GIFFARD. He was created Earl of Buckingham in 1100 x 1101.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 32,2\tab LITTLETON [PANNELL].}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Liteltone }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 can also be Littleton Drew in Dunley Hundred. However, William of Audrieu is probably the same as William }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 de Aldeleia}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Aldeleio}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  in version C)}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 of the Tax Return for Rowborough Hundred, who held the adjac
ent Lavington (60,1).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab THANELAND. See 1,3 thanelands note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 32,3\tab COMPTON [BASSETT]. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 See 27,2 Compton note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab THE THIRD PART OF 2 MILLS. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 See 27,2 and 67,63 for the other two parts.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 32,5\tab HUGH [* THE LARGE *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab 'CHARLTON'. Lost in Hungerford, Berkshire; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Berkshire, }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ii. p.}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
302. Hungerford was a Berkshire Ancient Parish but contained a portion in Wiltshire, represented by the
 Domesday settlements of 'Charlton' and Standen (39,1). Both were transferred to Berkshire in 1895. Standen and 'Charlton' were in Kinwardstone Hundred in 1086 allowing Chilton Foliat (28,2), later detached, to be continuous with that hundred. 'Charlton' 
was held by the heirs of the Earl Marshall to whom the lands of William of Eu passed; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , pp. 711, 745.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 32,6\tab HUGH [* THE LARGE *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 32,8\tab BERNARD [* PANCEVOLT *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 32,10\tab BERNARD [* PANCEVOLT *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab CODFORD. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 The mill is shared with Ashton Gifford to which the nearer Codford is Codford St Peter. See 27,14 mill note and 37,1 Codford note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab THE FOURTH PART OF A MILL. See 27,14 and 48,6 for the other parts of the mill.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }\pard\plain \s20\ql \fi-1080\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\aspalpha\faauto\rin0\lin1080\itap0\pararsid5329606 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\insrsid11419375 32,11\tab WARNER <OF DITTERIDGE>. The Dome
sday forms of this name - }{\i\insrsid11419375 Warneri}{\insrsid11419375 [}{\i\insrsid11419375 us}{\insrsid11419375 ], }{\i\insrsid11419375 Warnerus}{\insrsid11419375 , }{\i\insrsid11419375 Garner}{\insrsid11419375 [}{\i\insrsid11419375 us}{
\insrsid11419375 ], }{\i\insrsid11419375 Warnari}{\insrsid11419375 [}{\i\insrsid11419375 us}{\insrsid11419375 ] - represent Old German }{\i\insrsid11419375 Warinhari}{\insrsid11419375 , }{\i\insrsid11419375 Warinher}{\insrsid11419375  etc., Old French }{
\i\insrsid11419375 Garnier}{\insrsid11419375 : Forssner, }{\i\insrsid11419375 Continental-Germanic Personal Names in England}{\insrsid11419375 , pp. 247-48. The Alecto edition also has Warner. This is 
the only occurrence of this name in Domesday Wiltshire.
\par \tab \tab Warner is not a common name in Domesday Book, occurring less than two dozen times in all, and only twice in the south-west [see also SOM 26,7], both on the fief of the same tenant-in-chief. It is im
probable that these two holdings were held by different individuals, despite the distance between them (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }\pard\plain \ql \fi-1080\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin1080\itap0\pararsid5329606 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab 
1 HIDE ... ALSTAN [* OF BOSCOMBE *]. That is, Alstan of Boscombe. This hide is mentioned in 8,12.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 32,13\tab SEVINGTON. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, p. 27, identifies Sevenhampton in Highworth Hundred, but an analysis of the Tax Returns shows that a place in Thorngrove Hundred is required. Sevington was later in Chippenham Hundred.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 32,14\tab YATTON [KEYNELL].}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  For the identification of Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Getone}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 114.}{
\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab ALL THE ABOVE LANDS. They are 32,1-14.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 32,16\tab TOLI [* THOLF THE DANE *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab [***] COTTAGERS. In the manuscript there is a gap of about three letters before Cottagers; the figure was probably not to hand at the time of writing.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 32,17\tab UPTON [SCUDAMORE].}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  See 25,23 Upton note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab TOLI [* THOLF THE DANE *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab TAX FOR \'bd HIDE. In the manuscript the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 p }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 of }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 P}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 ro}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 
 dimid' hida }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 is a capital and is highlighted in red ink; Farley did not reproduce this. The }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 H }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 of }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Hernulf }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
('Arnulf') in the next line is similarly highlighted. See 25,23 for both these statements.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 33,1\tab SHAW. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 This Shaw is not given a Domesday precursor by }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, p. 307, but nalysis of the Tax Returns shows that it lay in 'Selkley' Hundred; see Jones, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Domesday for Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 215.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab ROBERT. Robert }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 debraiosa }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ('of Braose') in version B of the Tax Return for 'Selkley'}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
Hundred (Exon folio 14b6); probably a mistake, as in the other two versions of the Wiltshire Tax Returns (Exon folio 2a5 and}{\insrsid11419375  folio }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 8b4) he is plain Robert, holding 2 hides from William of Braose.}{\insrsid5329606 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 34\tab WILLIAM OF MOHUN. His holding is the only one in Wiltshire Domesday which is in the surviving portion of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Liber Exoniensis}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
 (Exon folio 47a1). The extra information given there is included either in the}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 translation or in 34,1 villagers note and mill note. The Latin text of the entry in the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Liber Exoniensis}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375  and a translation are given in \{Introduction: Related or 'Satellite' Texts\}.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 34,1\tab [Exon 47a1]
\par \tab SUTTON [VENY]. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Little Sutton, held by William's heirs in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 728, is in Sutton Veny}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Parish; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 
Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 154; }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 VCH Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , viii. p. 61. See also 38,1 Sutton note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab WALTER}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 . The corresponding entry in the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Liber Exoniensis}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  has: }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 W}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  Hosat}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 us}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ]:}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Walter Hussey; see Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , pp. 370-71.}{\insrsid5329606 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab VILLAGERS. The corresponding entry in the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Liber Exoniensis}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  has: 'The villagers [have] 2 hides, less 1 virgate'. The term }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 villani }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
is general and}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 includes the smallholders.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab MILL ... 4s A YEAR. Entries in the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Liber Exoniensis}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  almost always included }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 per annum}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  with present values.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab PASTURE \'bd LEAGUE LONG AND 1 FURLONG WIDE. The Great Domesday scribe probably omitted}{\insrsid11419375  }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 q}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 uarentena}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ]}{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 before the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 lat' }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 here, otherwise '1 league' is implied.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }\pard\plain \s20\ql \fi-1080\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\aspalpha\faauto\rin0\lin1080\itap0\pararsid5329606 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\insrsid11419375 36,1\tab 
ALSI <OF CASTLE CARY>. The Domesday forms of the name-form Alsi - }{\i\insrsid11419375 Alsi}{\insrsid11419375 , }{\i\insrsid11419375 Alsius}{\insrsid11419375 , }{\i\insrsid11419375 Elsi}{\insrsid11419375 , }{\i\insrsid11419375 Aelsi}{\insrsid11419375 , }{
\i\insrsid11419375 Alsicus}{\insrsid11419375 , }{\i\insrsid11419375 Alsidus}{\insrsid11419375  etc. - could represent Old English }{\i\insrsid11419375 \'c6lfsige}{\insrsid11419375 , Old English }{\i\insrsid11419375 \'c6thelsige}{\insrsid11419375 
 or perhaps Old English }{\i\insrsid11419375 Ealdsige}{\insrsid11419375 , }{\i\insrsid11419375 Ealhsige}{\insrsid11419375 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid11419375 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\insrsid11419375 , pp. 151-52, under }{
\i\insrsid11419375 Al-sige}{\insrsid11419375 , see also p. 142, under }{\i\insrsid11419375 Al-}{\insrsid11419375 . JRM followed von Feilitzen in keeping to the base form, but preferred the second element -si for the Old English }{\i\insrsid11419375 -sige}
{\insrsid11419375 , as that is what is found in the vast majority of instance
s in Domesday. The Alecto edition has Alsige. However, in some of the Phillimore printed translations the forms Alfsi and Alfsige appear for people who in the present edition are now rendered Alsi because the forms of their names lack an }{
\i\insrsid11419375 -f-}{\insrsid11419375  or }{\i\insrsid11419375 -v- }{\insrsid11419375 which JRM thought was necessary for it to be included under Alfsi (a few of them appear in von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid11419375 
Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\insrsid11419375 , p. 180, under Old English }{\i\insrsid11419375 \'c6lfsige}{\insrsid11419375 , and on pp. 187-88, under Old English }{\i\insrsid11419375 \'c6thelsige}{\insrsid11419375 
). The Alecto edition has Alsige for those that appear there under Old English }{\i\insrsid11419375 \'c6lfsige}{\insrsid11419375 
\par \tab \tab Alsi, one of the major predecessors of Walter of Douai, was a substantial west-country thane whose properties clustered around his large manor of Castle Cary in Somerset and around Mohuns Ottery in
 Devon, with single manors in Dorset and Wiltshire. In Devon, Alsi had an outlier across the Exe at Dunsford, just a couple of miles from the nearest of two adjacent holdings at Lowley and Doddiscombsleigh held by an Alsi who is probably the same individu
al. See also Clarke, }{\i\insrsid11419375 English Nobility}{\insrsid11419375 
, p. 240, who inexplicably omits the holding at Castle Raleigh (DEV 23,21) and includes Ottery twice. He also omits the holdings in Dorset and Wiltshire, perhaps because of their distance from the Somerset group. But Als
i is not a common name in either of these counties, occurring only once more in Dorset and twice for laymen in Wiltshire, so the antecessorial link through Walter of Douai is a persuasive one. The two manors were fairly substantial, similar in this respec
t to his holdings in Devon (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }\pard\plain \ql \fi-1080\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin1080\itap0\pararsid5329606 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\cf1\insrsid11419375 37,1\tab 
CODFORD. Probably Codford St Mary, held (as East Codford) by Oliver de Ingham,}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 a descendant of Waleran; see Jones, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Domesday for Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, p. 210; and 27,14 mill note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 37,5\tab LEOFDAY.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  The manuscript has }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Leueclai }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 for }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Leuedai }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 through the common confusion between }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 cl }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 d}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 see }{\insrsid11419375 von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid11419375 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book
}{\insrsid11419375 , p. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 311 note 4.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab BEFORE 1066. The manuscript has two }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 7}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  signs after }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 T.R.E.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 one at the en
d of the first line, the}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 other at the beginning of the next, in error.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 37,7\tab LANGFORD. Probably Steeple Langford held by Oliver de Ingham and Laurence of St Martin, descendants of Waleran; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , v. p. 202; Jones, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 
Domesday for Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 221.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 37,8\tab LANGFORD. Probably Hanging Langford, the mill being the other half of that at 20,5.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab \'bd MILL. See 20,5 for the other half.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 37,9\tab BEFORE 1066. See 26,17 before note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 37,10\tab BEFORE 1066. See 26,17 before note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 37,11\tab GRIMSTEAD. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 The holding probably contained both East Grimstead and West Grimstead, later held by Waleran's heirs; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ii. p. 242a; }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 747.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 37,12\tab OF WHICH ... LORDSHIP. In the manuscript there is a gap of about two letters (possibly }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 st' }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 erased) between }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 De ea }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 and }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 in dn'io}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 not reproduced by Farley.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 37,15\tab [WEST] DEAN. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 A further part of West Dean was in Hampshire in 1086, but it }{\insrsid11419375 was added to West Tytherley (Wiltshire) in 1883 leaving West Dean thereafter entirely in Wiltshire; see }{
\i\insrsid11419375 VCH Hampshire}{\insrsid11419375 , iv. pp. 499, 519; }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Youngs, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Local Administrative Units}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , i. p. }{\insrsid11419375 225.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
 East Dean (SU2726) was and is just in Hampshire. Both these Hampshire estates were also held by Waleran in 1086 (HAM 45,5-6).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 37,16\tab HURDCOTT. The position of Waleran's other holdings make it likely that this is the Hurdcott in Winterbourne Earls. See }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, p. 384; and 27,25 Hurdcott note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab [***]. No holder is actually named; probably Waleran was intended.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 38,1\tab SUTTON [VENY].}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  Analysis of the Tax Returns shows that it lay in Warminister Hundred. The two parts of a mill at 13s 4d are completed by the third part at 6s 8d in 56,4. This is probably the }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Magna Sutton }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 of the Book of Fees. See 34,1 Sutton note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab 2 PARTS OF A MILL. See 56,4 for the third part.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 39,1\tab STANDEN. It was formerly known as Standen Hussey from}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Richard Hus\'e9e who held from the Ferri\'e8
res family. Analysis of the Tax Returns shows that it lay in Kinwardstone Hundred; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Berkshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ii. pp.
 304-305. Standen, like 'Charlton' (32,5) was a part of Hungerford Ancient Parish, most of which was in Berkshire. Like 'Charlton', it was transferred to Berkshire in 1895; see 32,5 'Charlton' note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab GODRIC [* THE SHERIFF *]. Godric is twice named as the predecessor of Henry of Ferrers (BRK 1,37. 21,13); this and his official status enable him to be identified in many cases. See also Clarke, }{\i\insrsid11419375 
English Nobility}{\insrsid11419375 , pp. 309-10 (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab A WOOD WHICH BELONGED TO BEDWYN. Bedwyn (1,2) is adjacent to Standen.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 39,2\tab GODRIC [* THE SHERIFF *]. See 39,1 Godric note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 40\tab RICHARD SON OF GILBERT. Count Gilbert o}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 f Brionne, in the d\'e9partement of Eure, France.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 40,1\tab SUTTON [MANDEVILLE].}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  Geoffrey (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Galfridus}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ) de Mandeville was a descendant of Richard; see Jones, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Domesday for Wiltshire}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 234.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab BERENGAR [* GIFFARD *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 41,2\tab OIDELARD [* THE STEWARD *]. The Domesday forms of this 1086 tenant are }{\i\insrsid11419375 Oilard}{\insrsid11419375 [}{\i\insrsid11419375 us}{\insrsid11419375 ] in Huntingdonshire, }{\i\insrsid11419375 Oidelard}{
\insrsid11419375 [}{\i\insrsid11419375 us}{\insrsid11419375 ] in other counties, and are accepted by Forssner, }{\i\insrsid11419375 Continental-Germanic Personal Names in England}{\insrsid11419375 , p. 195, as representing Old German }{\i\insrsid11419375 
Odalhard}{\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\insrsid11419375  Odel}{\insrsid11419375 (}{\i\insrsid11419375 h}{\insrsid11419375 )}{\i\insrsid11419375 ard}{\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\insrsid11419375  Odilard }{\insrsid11419375 
etc. with loss of the dental in the Huntingdonshire form. However, an Old French form, not given by him, is more likely; the Domesday form suggest it was }{\i\insrsid11419375 Oidelard}{\insrsid11419375 
, with characteristic Old French differentiation of the initial long vowel. In the Phillimore printed edition the forms Odelard and Odilard appear and these have now been standardized as
 Oidelard. The Alecto edition has Oilard for the Huntingdonshire tenants and Oidelard for the rest.
\par \tab \tab Oidelard}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  was a tenant of Ralph of Mortimer in Shropshire, Herefordshire and elsewhere, including Buckton (SHR 6,21) and Downton-on-the-Rock (HEF 9,2). He was perhaps his steward: Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 
Domesday People}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 312.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 41,4\tab TOTI <OF HIGHWAY>. The Domesday forms of this name - }{\i\insrsid11419375 Toti}{\insrsid11419375  and, once }{\i\insrsid11419375 Toti}{\insrsid11419375 [}{\i\insrsid11419375 us}{\insrsid11419375 ] - represent Old Danish }{
\i\insrsid11419375 Toti}{\insrsid11419375 : von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid11419375 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\insrsid11419375 , p. 387. The Alecto edition has Toti. This is the only occurrence of this name in Domesday Wiltshire.
\par \tab \tab The name Toti occurs on eight holdings, probably representing six individuals. The Toti who purchased this tiny holding from Malmesbury Abbey is unlike
ly to have been connected to any other Totis, all of whom from other tenants-in-chief and none of whom held nearby (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab LIFETIMES OF THREE MEN. See 7,2 lifetimes note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 41,7\tab SURRENDELL. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 The Domesday name-form is }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Sirendone}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 . It is not listed by }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, p. 71, but other early forms of the name are similar, and it was held by the Mortimers in the thirteenth century; see Jones, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Domesday for Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 231; }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 VCH Wiltshire}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ii. p. 152 no. 360.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 42,1\tab COTTAGERS. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Cozez }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 for }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 cozets}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  or}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  coscez}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 the usual plural forms. See M3 Cottagers note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 42,4\tab CUTHWULF. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Coolle}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 see }{\insrsid11419375 von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid11419375 
Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\insrsid11419375 , p. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 220.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 42,5\tab BRIGMERSTON. It is named after the 1066 holder, Brictmer; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 369.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 42,6\tab [IS]. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 E}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 st}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ] is}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 omitted in error in the manuscript.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 42,8\tab FITTLETON. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 The name (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Viteletone}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  in Domesday) means 'Fitela's }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 tun}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 '. The name of the 1066 holder, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Vitel}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , is apparently a coincidence, Fittleton having originated before his possible lifetime; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 330.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab 1 VIRGATE. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 un }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 for }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 una}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 an ink blot appears to have 
been erased after it.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 42,9\tab SHAW. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 That is, Shaw in Chute, identified hesitantly by }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 341. Robert holds both Fosbury and Biddesden in the area (42,2-4).}{
\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 42,10\tab VITALIS. Domesday}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Fitheus}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 see }{\insrsid11419375 von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid11419375 
Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\insrsid11419375 , pp. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 405-406.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 43,1\tab MOREDON. The Tax Returns give Robert 5 hides lordship in 'Selkley' Hundred and 7 hides in Highworth Hundred. Domesday gives him a holding of 1 hide and 1 virgate in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Moredone }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
and a lordship of 6 hides in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Hantone}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  Moredone }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 is probably Moredon, placed by }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, p. 33, in Shippen (= "Scipa") Hundred. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Hantone }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 is either Hampton in Highworth (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 27) or, like }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Hentone }{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 (29,7), is Broad Hinton in 'Selkley' Hundred. The identification of }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, p. 27, has been adopted here for Hampton (43,2) but either solution leaves a Tax Return entry not accounted for. A Robert holds Hannington (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Hanindone}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ) in Highworth Hundred from Glastonbury (7,2)
 but the lordship is not given.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 43,2\tab HAMPTON. See 43,1 Moredon note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab PASTURE 1 FURLONG. The manuscript and Farley have }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 pastura i. q'}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 the Ordnance Survey facsimile has a line over the }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 i.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 44\tab [LAND] OF ROGER OF COURSEULLES. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Terra}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  is}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
omitted in error in the manuscript; also in the heading for chapters 45, 52, 55, 62, 64-66. The whole heading is omitted in chapters 46 and 60.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 44,1\tab FISHERTON[-DE-LA-MERE].}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  A detached part of Warminster Hundred in later times, and an analysis of the Tax Returns shows that it lay there. Compare 12,6 Dinton note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab BONDI [* THE CONSTABLE *]. Bondi is named as the constable on the fiefs of William son of Ansculf (BUK 17,9), the Count of Mortain (BUK 12,29), and Henry of Ferrers (BUK 27,1), though named Bod
ing the constable in Henry's case. This was certainly Bondi, however, since Henry succeeded him in four other counties and laid claim in a fifth as Bondi's successor (GLS 31,2). Apart from other the links through the Count of Mortain and William son of An
sculf, it is probable that the Bondi who held manors valued at over \'a3
10 was, in most, of not all cases, the constable; and his status as a lord of men identifies him at Colemore in Hampshire (HAM 57,2), and therefore probably on the adjacent holding at Emps
hott (HAM 62,1). Finally, the Bondi who preceded Countess Judith in several of her holdings in Northamptonshire may also have been the constable. There can be little doubt that the Countess had only one predecessor named Bondi, five of his seven holdings 
being centred on Earls Barton, held with full jurisdiction, the whole complex worth \'a3
16. Its status certainly befitted someone of the constable's status, and Earls Barton was just a couple of miles from his manor at Ecton, acquired by Henry of Ferrers. Some
 further, if slight support, for this identification is supplied by Orderic Vitalis, }{\i\insrsid11419375 Ecclesiastical History}{\insrsid11419375 
, according to whom Earl Waltheof granted the manor of Barnack to Crowland Abbey, a gift later defeated by 'the malice of the Normans' (Chibnall, ii.
 pp. 344-45). Barnack was held in Domesday Book by William son of Ansculf, as noted above the constable's predecessor elsewhere. He may, therefore, have stepped into Waltheof's shoes in those cases, too, Waltheof being the first to succeed to those estate
s of the constable. See also Clarke, }{\i\insrsid11419375 English Nobility}{\insrsid11419375 , pp. 266-67, whose list omits ESS 29,5. HAM 57,2. 62,1. IoW9,15. NTH 36,2. 56,15-18;37-38;53 (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 45,1\tab 1 HIDE [IS] IN LORDSHIP. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 sunt }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ('are') for }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 est}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  ('is')}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 .}{
\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab 1 HOUSE IN MALMESBURY. See M16 where Roger of Berkeley is recorded as holding 1 messuage in the borough.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 45,2\tab ON LEASE FROM. In the manuscript }{\i\f720\cf1\insrsid11419375 p' prest\'fb}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 which is more likely to be }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 per prest}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 it}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 um }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ('on lease from'), than }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 perprest}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 ur}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
]}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 um }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ('as a purpresture of') as in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 VCH Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ii. p. 154 no. 378. See Jones, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Domesday for Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 115.
}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab EDRIC THE SHERIFF. Sheriff of Wiltshire; Edward of Salisbury's predecessor.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 45,3\tab EASTON [GREY].}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  Analysis of the Tax Returns shows that this 'Easton' lay in Dunley Hundred.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 46\tab BERNARD PANCEVOLT. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Pancevolt }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 means 'paunch-face'; see Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , pp. 324-25.}{
\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 46,1\tab `FRUSTFIELD'. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 See 27,26 'Frustfield' note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 48,1\tab ELSTON.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  This estate and the next (48,2) are }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Wintreburne}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  in Domesday. They may well refer to the same place, Elston, earlier }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 
Wintreburn' Elye Giffard }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 from a descendant of the}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Domesday holder. Elias Giffard also held part of Maddington and Shrewton; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, pp. 721, 742; }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 235.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab DUNN <OF BRIMPSFIELD>. Dunn was the official predecessor of Osbern Giffard, most of his land lying across the boundaries between Gloucestershire, Somerset and Wiltshire. Alth
ough the term itself was not used, an entry for 'Oldbury' in Gloucestershire (GLS 50,4) records that this holding of Giffard's 'did not belong to the man Dunn's land which Osbern holds, as the Shire states'. It is also probable that the Dunn who held Bitt
o
n (GLS 78,13) and Buckland Dinham (SOM 47,19) in both 1066 and 1086, and Barley in 1066 (67,28) was the same individual since Buckland was adjacent to the holding of Osbern's predecessor at Elm, and Bitton and Barley were circled by several other of his h
o
ldings. Given that the name is uncommon and survival on the same holding for two decades even more so, it is also possible that the only other Dunn to have survived in this manner, the tenant of two manors in Devon (DEV 52,34-35), is the same man, in whic
h case the royal manors held by Dunn lying between the Devon properties and those of Osbern Giffard may have been his also; but without tenurial or other associations to support the case it would be rash to make the identification. See also Clarke, }{
\i\insrsid11419375 English Nobility}{\insrsid11419375 , whose list omits BRK 39,1. GLS 78,13 and SOM 47,19 (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 48,2\tab ELSTON. See 48,1 Elston note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 48,3\tab ORCHESTON. See also 48,7. One of these holdings was probably in 'Dolesfield' Hundred, and one in Heytesbury Hundr
ed according to an analysis of the Tax Returns. The 48,7 Orcheston falls between places in Heytesbury Hundred in Domesday, and there is an Orcheston in Heytesbury Hundred in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , v. p. 211.}{
\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 48,4\tab STANTON [ST QUINTIN]. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 An analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in Startley Hundred. It was later in Chippenham Hundred.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab MEADOW, 6 ACRES. See 7,5 and 7,5 acres note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 48,5\tab MIDDLETON. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 349, identifies Milton Lilbourne, but analysis of the Tax Returns suggests a place in Warminster Hundred. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 
Middeldun }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 was given by Elye Giffard to the Abbey of Fontenay according to }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 743. See }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, ii. p. 276b; and 24,29 Middleton note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab DUNN <OF BRIMPSFIELD>. See 48,1 Dunn note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 48,6\tab CODFORD. Probably Codford St Peter. See 32,10 Codford note and 37,1 Codford note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab THE FOURTH PART OF A MILL. See 27,14 and 32,10 for the other parts of the mill.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 48,7\tab ORCHESTON. See 48,3 Orcheston note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 48,8\tab [HILL] DEVERILL. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 The Giffard holding is }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Hulledeverel }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 728.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 48,9\tab KELLAWAYS. Formerly Tytherton Kellaways held by Elias de Kayleway from Elias Giffard in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 746. See }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, v. p. 208; }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 99. Analysis of the Tax Returns shows that it lay in Chippenham Hundred.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab DUNN <OF BRIMPSFIELD>. See 48,1 Dunn note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 48,10\tab \'bd MILL. See 48,11 for the other half.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 48,12\tab EDNOTH [* THE CONSTABLE *]. Ednoth, named Ednoth the constable (}{\i\insrsid11419375 Ednod}{\insrsid11419375  }{\i\insrsid11419375 Stalre}{\insrsid11419375 ) in BRK 7,7 and Ednoth the steward (}{\i\insrsid11419375 
Ednod dapifer}{\insrsid11419375 
) in 22,5, was one of the predecessors of Earl Hugh of Chester, a fact which permits the identification of many of those holdings where he is named simply Ednoth. He has also been plausibly identified as the Ednoth of Ugford in Wiltshire and of Whitchurch
 in Hampshire. In many instances, however, Earl Hugh's predecessor is called Alnoth}{\i\insrsid11419375  (Alnod, Elnod}{\insrsid11419375 
), and scholarly opinion is divided as to whether this is the same individual as Ednoth. Since Ednoth the constable had a son Harding (William of Malmesbury, }{\i\insrsid11419375 Gesta Regum}{\insrsid11419375 , p. 471), and Harding son of Alnoth (}{
\i\insrsid11419375 Harding filius Alnod}{\insrsid11419375 ) held land in Wiltshire in 1086 (SOM 47,3-8), the identity of Ednoth and Alnoth seems probable, further strengthened by the appearance of a Ceolred - a rare name - among the dependents of 
both Harding son of Alnoth and Harding son of Ednoth: Lewis, }{\cf17\insrsid11419375 'Formation of the Honour of Chester'}{\insrsid11419375 , pp. 67-68; Williams, }{\i\insrsid11419375 The English and the Norman Conquest}{\insrsid11419375 
, pp. 119-22. As Dr Williams has pointed out, a similar scribal confusion between Alnoth and Ednoth can be detected in Cornwall and Lincolnshire (}{\i\insrsid11419375 ibid}{\insrsid11419375 
em, p. 121 note 127). A like confusion may account for the omission of Ednoth's lands in Devon and Dorset from Peter Clarke's lists, along with Knowle, Ugford and Whitchurch: Clarke, }{\i\insrsid11419375 English Nobility}{\insrsid11419375 , pp. 28
1-82 (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 49,1a\tab THIS ENTRY is written in darker ink at the bottom of folio 72d, but extending some three letters' width into the left margin, though this was not shown by Farley. It is not part of 49,1 though written in the middle of
 it, nor part of Osbern Giffard's lands. It may have been written earlier than some, or all, of folio 72d, because there seems no other reason why the scribe should stop in the middle of 49,1 two lines up from the end of the column.}{\insrsid5329606 

\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab ROGER OF LACY. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 From Lassy in the French d\'e9partement of Calvados.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab COLESHILL. The vill was divided between counties. For the remainder, see BRK 14,1. 28,1. 55,1. See also }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 VCH Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ii. p. 156 no. 395 and note 51; }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 
Place-Names of Berkshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ii. p. 356. Coleshill is now entirely in Berkshire. }{\insrsid11419375 
It is not certain whether, after 1086, this present hide was transferred to Wiltshire, thus involving an unrecorded boundary change, or whether the hide remained in Wiltshire but was no longer regarded as part of Coleshill.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 49,2\tab EASTON.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  Analysis of the Tax Returns shows that the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Estone}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  of 25,26 lay Thorngrove Hundred and must therefore be Easton Piercy, and that the }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Estone}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  of 45,3 lay in Dunley Hundred and must be Easton Grey.}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 The present Easton could be either Easton Pi
ercy or Easton Grey, or the Easton in Kinwardstone Hundred; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 545.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 50,1\tab 
SHALBOURNE. Half of what became the Ancient Parish was in Berkshire in 1086 (BRK 1,27). The Berkshire portion included Oxenwood tithing, not named in Domesday and Bagshot tithing (BRK 21,6). Oxenwood was transferred to Wiltshire in 1844 and Bagshot and th
e rest of the Berkshire part of Shalbourne were transferred in 1895, putting the whole of Shalbourne in Wiltshire thereafter; see Youngs, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Local Administrative Units}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , i. pp. 22-23.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab "ARPENT". See 12,4 "arpent" note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 50,2\tab HAROLD <OF WESTLECOTT>. The tenant of this modest holding had no tenurial associations with any of his namesakes, none of them close by. Westlecott is likely to have been his only property (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 51\tab THIS CHAPTER is written in two lines across the bottom of folio 73a,b with signs}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 indicating its correct position in the text.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab HUGH SON OF BALDRIC. Sheriff of Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 51,1\tab WALTER [* OF RIVERS *].}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  Probably Walter }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 de Rivera }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ('Rivers'); version A of the Tax Returns (Exon folio 1a6) for}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
Swanborough Hundred has 'Walter }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 de Rivera}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , 5 hides, which Hugh gave to his daughter',}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 probably as a dowry.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 52,1\tab SHORNCOTE. It was transferred to Gloucestershire in 1897.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 54,1\tab 
ALWY [* SON OF BANNA *]. A wealthy magnate in the south-west, named in the Exon Domesday on several occasions (SOM 6,9 [but see SOM 6,9 Alwy note]. SOM 35,13-14;16;24 [but see SOM 35,24 Alwy note]), predecessor of Alfred of 'Spain' for almost the whole of
 his honour (not 35,6-9;11) apart from two holdings he stole and two others in Herefordshire. The scribe emphasized Alwy's status as designated predecessor by noting that the stolen manors had been 'added' to Alwy's lands (SOM 35,12;14). See also Clarke, 
}{\i\insrsid11419375 English Nobility}{\insrsid11419375 , pp. 221-22, who failed to note that Exon recorded Alwy's byname and omitted the entries for SOM 35,1-5, perhaps in the belief that they had been held by a different Alwy (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 

\par }{\insrsid11419375 55\tab AIULF THE SHERIFF. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Sheriff of Dorset. He is called Aiulf the chamberlain in Domesday Dorset; see DOR 49 Aiulf note. The personal name is the Anglo-Norman form for Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Athulf
}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  /}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 \'c6thelwulf}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ; see }{\insrsid11419375 von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid11419375 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\insrsid11419375 , p. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 191.}{
\insrsid5329606 
\par }\pard\plain \s20\ql \fi-1080\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\aspalpha\faauto\rin0\lin1080\itap0\pararsid5329606 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\insrsid11419375 55,1\tab TOLLARD [ROYAL]. This place lies on t
he border with Dorset. Aiulf the sheriff also held the adjacent estates of Farnham in Dorset (DOR 19,11. 49,8;17). Farnham incorporated a portion called Tollard Farnham, and it may be that the 1086 boundary included this in Wiltshire; see }{
\i\insrsid11419375 VCH Wiltshire}{\insrsid11419375 , xiii. p. 83.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }\pard\plain \ql \fi-1080\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin1080\itap0\pararsid5329606 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\cf1\insrsid11419375 56,3\tab 
NIGEL ALSO HOLDS 1 HIDE IN NETHERAVON. His holding of the church of the manor of Netheravon with 1 hide is recorded at 1,18.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 56,4\tab SUTTON [VENY]. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 See 38,1 Sutton note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab SAINTE-MARIE OF MONTEBOURG.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  In the diocese of Coutances in Normandy.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab THE THIRD PART OF A MILL. See 38,1 for the other two-thirds of this mill.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab SPIRTES THE PRIEST. A wealthy churchman who held a total of nearly 80 hides in Somerset, Hampshire, Wiltshire, Herefordshire and Shropshire. In SHR 3d,7 he is described as one of the twelve canons of St Mary's, Bromfield.}{
\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 56,5\tab ALSI THE PRIEST. On this name-form, see 36,1 Alsi note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 56,6\tab ALSI THE PRIEST. On this name-form, see 36,1 Alsi note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 57,1\tab ALSI. On this name-form, see 36,1 Alsi note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 58,1\tab GUNNAR <OF AVINGTON>. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 The name Gunnar occurs on almost 20 holdings in Domesday Book, distributed between Cornwall and Yorkshire and acquired by or held from eleven tenants-in-chief. The two subst
antial holdings in Berkshire and Wiltshire devolved upon the same tenant-in-chief who is unlikely to have had two predecessors with the same uncommon name among the handful from whom he acquired his lands (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab [HIDES?]. The manuscript has }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 car'}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Although this could be an abbreviation for }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 carucatae}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375  ('carucates'), it is more likely to be a mistake for }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 hidae}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 certainly not 'ploughs' as they are mentioned next.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 

\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 58,2\tab ST MARY'S OF WILTON HELD THIS LAND. The abbess's claim on this land is mentioned in 13,9; see 13,9 Richard note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 59,1\tab LAVINGTON. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 In }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ii. p. 232a, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Johannes Marescallus}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, perhaps a descendant of Robert, holds Lavington Episcopi, that is West Lavington; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 240).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab SLAVES. The manuscript and Farley have }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 serui 7 xiiii vill}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 an}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 i}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 but the Ordnance Survey facsimile has not reproduced the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 7}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , which is rather faint.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 59,2\tab GORE.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  Analysis of the Tax Returns shows that it lay in 'Dolesfield' Hundred. See }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ii. p. 254a; }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Feudal Aids}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 , v. p. 203.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 60,1\tab HOLDS. The Ordnance Survey facsimile has not reproduced the abbreviation mark over }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 ten'}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 which is in the manuscript and Farley.
}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab LAVINGTON. Perhaps Market Lavington. Lavington is held by Roger Gernon from}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 William Blund (possibly a descendant of Robert) in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 736. Roger's holding is }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Stepel Lavintone }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 (that is, Market Lavington)}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Rotuli Hundredorum}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ii. p. 236a. See }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Feudal Aids}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , v. p. 238; }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 240; }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 VCH Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, x. p. 87.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab TWO SONS-IN-LAW.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  These were William of Audley and Robert of Aumale, according to the Tax Returns for Rowborough Hundred. They were given their holding in this hundred by Robert Blunt (}{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Blondus}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 from his lordship; presumably the 4 hides mentioned there were a dowry as they were given to each 'with his daughter'.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 61,1\tab COWESFIELD. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Cuvlestone}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  is identified by }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, p. 140, as Coulston, although an analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in 'Frustfield' Hundred. It must be the same place as }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Cuvlesfeld }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 held in }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 , pp. 11, 586, by Wilfred Sturmid, probably a descendant of the Domesday holder. The place is probably part of Cowesfield which is Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Colesfeld }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 (67,10).}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 
 Cuvlestone }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Colesfeld }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 have the same derivation ('Cufel's }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 tun' }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 and 'Cufel's (open) land');}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 389.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 63,1\tab MADDINGTON. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 This 'Winterbourne' passed to the Le Moyne family who held it as Maddington: }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Book of Fees}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , pp. 742, 1178. See }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 
VCH Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ii. pp. 73, 159 (no. 425); and 16,6 Winterbourne note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 65,1\tab WINTERBOURNE. The entry refers to half a mill at 3s 9d and is}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 complemented by Winterbournes at 67,36 and 67,95 where parts of a mill each pay 22 \'bd
 d (half of 3s 9d). Analysis of the Tax Returns shows that all three lay in Alderbury Hundred. They are possibly located at Winterbourne Gunner, since Saeric holds Winterbourne and Laverstock (67,95-96) and the latter is adjacent to Winterbourne Gunner.}{
\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab \'bd MILL. See 67,36 and 67,95 for the parts to make the probable other half of this mill.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 65,2\tab MARGINAL SIGN. See 68,1 manuscript note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 66,1\tab [CASTLE] EATON. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , pp. 23-24, identifies Water Eaton. However, the next mention of that place is in 1281, and it is safer to regard Domesday }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Etone }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 as Castle Eaton (as }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Ettone}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 :}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 21,1) or possibly as Yatton Keynell (see 6,1 Yatton note a
nd 25,27 Yatton note.) The holding in 21,1 is said to be half of Castle Eaton, so another entry in Domesday would be expected.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab 1 VILLAGER. It is unusual for the villagers to be placed after the smallholders and}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Cottagers; this also occurs at 67,28 and 68,14.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab WOODLAND 2 FURLONGS. So the manuscript; Farley misprinted '1 furlong'.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 66,2\tab MANNINGFORD. This holding and }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Maniford}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  (67,43) share a mill and are both probably Manningford Bruce; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 VCH Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, x. p. 114.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab THIRD PART OF A MILL. The remainder of the mill is two parts at 12s 6d in 67,43; see 67,43 mill note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 66,3\tab HILPERTON. Both estates (66,3-4) were probably in Melksham Hundred in 1086, according to an analysis of the Tax Return for that hundred. They were later in 'Whorwellsdown' Hundred.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 66,4\tab HILPERTON. See 66,3 Hilperton note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 66,5\tab GILLINGHAM. This estate lay in Dorset in 1086 and an analysis of the Dorset Tax Return shows that it lay in the
 Dorset hundred of Gillingham. It appears that the estate was allocated to the wrong county when the main scribe of Great Domesday was working through a composite schedule in a part of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Liber Exoniensis}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
 that has not survived and abstracting the lands of a series of minor tenants. In surviving parts of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Liber Exoniensis}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
 the arrangement is by holder(s) then by county and then by hundred and it is possible that the scribe missed an 'In Dorset' heading, or that is was missing from the manuscript; see 23,10 Gussage note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 66,6\tab EARLSCOURT. Analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in 'Thornhill' Hundred, although it was later in Ramsbury Hundred.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 66,8\tab OSMUND [* THE INTERPRETER *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 67,1\tab IT PAID TAX FOR \'bd HIDE. It would seem from these figures that the lordship land did not pay tax. This is}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 not always the case, as can be seen from the Tax Returns.}{
\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,2\tab BRICTRIC ^[BROTHER OF ALWY]^. Domesday }{\i\insrsid11419375 Brictric}{\insrsid11419375  is a}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  Norman rendering of Old English }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Brihtric}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  (= }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Beorhtric}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,5\tab [MONKTON] FARLEIGH. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 So }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 120, which also identifies the Farley in Alderbury}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
Hundred as a Domesday place (p. 378).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,9\tab ODSTOCK.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 ch }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 is written above the second }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 t }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 in the place-name, altering it from }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Odestote }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 to }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Odestoche}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 the scribe omitted to underline the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 t }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
for deletion.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,11\tab ALWARD [* COLLING *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab IT PAID TAX WITH THE BISHOP'S MANOR. That is, with the episcopal manor of Potterne (3,1). The bishop in 1066 was Bishop Herman; see 3,1 bishop note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab [***] 4 FURLONGS. There is a gap of about four letters in the manuscript with }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 r }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 (for }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 require}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 'enquire') in the margin next to it, to remind the scribe to find out what was being thus described. Farley did not reproduce the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 r}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 . See 25,2 furlongs note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab BISHOP OSMUND [* OF SALISBURY *]. Bishop o}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 f Salisbury. He is presumably claiming the 3 hides beca
use Wulfward White, the purchaser, had died and they were then due to revert to the bishopric by the terms of the purchase; see 3,1.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,12\tab ALWARD [* COLLING *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,13\tab ALWARD [* COLLING *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab BEFORE 1066. The manuscript has }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 T.R.E. geldb'}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Farley misprinted }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 T.R.E. 7 geldb'}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 .}{
\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab THE VILLAGERS HOLD [THEM?]. The manuscript has }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Vill}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 [}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 an}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ]}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 i tenent}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 .}{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 There is no way of telling from 
the Latin whether the land or the ploughs are the object. However, except for 23,2 and possibly 24,3, the villagers' land holding is not given in Wiltshire, whereas their ploughs almost invariably are. Compare 1,23a ('a priest has them') and 23,2 ('a than
e held it).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 67,15\tab VALUE ... NOW 8s. Perhaps a mistake for \'a38, as this is rather a large drop in value.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,16\tab AELFRIC [* OF MELKSHAM *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab [MONKTON] FARLEIGH.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  So }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 120, which also identifies the Farley in Alderbury}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
Hundred as a Domesday place (p. 378).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,17\tab AELFRIC [* OF MELKSHAM *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab WHADDON.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  Analysis of the Tax Returns shows that it lay in Melksham Hundred. It is later in}{\insrsid11419375  '}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Whorwellsdown' Hundred.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 67,22\tab SOMERFORD. See 24,20 Somerford note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab PART OF A MILL. The whole mill is made up of the parts represented by 24,20. 67,22-23;25, each part paying 15d.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,23\tab SOMERFORD. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 See 24,20 Somerford note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab PART OF A MILL. The whole mill is made up of the parts represented by 24,20. 67,22-23;25, each part paying 15d.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,24\tab SOMERFORD. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 See 24,20 Somerford note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,25\tab SOMERFORD. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 See 24,20 Somerford note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab PART OF A MILL. The whole mill is made up of the parts represented by 24,20. 67,22-23;25, each part paying 15d.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,28\tab AZUR. On his name, see 23,10 Azur note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab `BARLEY'.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  Lost in South Wraxall; see Jones, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Domesday for Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 198; }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 VCH Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, ii. p. 161 no. 464. Analysis of the Tax Returns shows that it lay in Bradford Hundred.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab DUNN <OF BRIMPSFIELD>. See 48,1 Dunn note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab 2 VILLAGERS. See 66,1 villagers note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,33\tab AZUR. On his name, see 23,10 Azur note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,34\tab ALDRED [* BROTHER OF ODO *]. Note to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,35\tab ALDRED [* BROTHER OF ODO *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab ALDERSTONE. Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Ferstesfield}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , that is, the lost sett
lement of 'Frustfield'; see 27,26 'Frustfield' note. The particular identification is with Alderstone, a farm in Whiteparish, which is probably named after the Domesday holder (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Aldred}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ); see }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 388.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,36\tab ALDRED [* BROTHER OF ODO *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab WINTERBOURNE. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 On the identity, see 65,1 Winterbourne note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab PART OF A MILL. See 65,1 mill note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 67,37\tab THIS ENTRY and the next (67,38) are written in two lines across t
he bottom of folio 73c,d, with a sign beside them but no corresponding one in the columns to indicate their correct position. However, they naturally belong with Aldred's other holdings.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab ALDRED [* BROTHER OF ODO *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 67,38\tab ON THE POSITION of this entry in the manuscript, see 67,37 entry note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab ALDRED [* BROTHER OF ODO *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,39\tab `WINTERBOURNE'.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  On the River Till. Analysis of the Tax Returns shows that it lay in 'Dolesfield' Hundred. It could be one of the several sites later distinguished by more particular names. See \{
Introduction: The Identification of Places\}.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab IN LORDSHIP ... 1 PLOUGH. The Latin is ambiguous, with two main verbs (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 sunt }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 habent}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 );}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 it could also be translated: 'In lordship 2 ploughs. 5 slaves with 1 villager a smallholders have 1 plough', although in Domesday slaves do not usually have a share in the villagers' ploughs. Compare DEV 28,16 lordship note.}{
\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,41\tab CYPPING <OF WORTHY>. Domesday}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Cheping}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 See Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Old English Bynames}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 177; }{\insrsid11419375 von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid11419375 Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\insrsid11419375 , p. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 221 (under }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Cypping}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
). See HAM 29,3 Cypping note.}{\insrsid11419375 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab \tab }{\insrsid11419375 Cypping was a wealthy Anglo-Saxon magnate whose lands l
ay almost entirely in Hampshire, centred on the valuable manor of [Headbourne] Worthy, leased from the bishopric of Winchester. He was important enough for the Conqueror to retain several of his manors in his own hands, his remaining holdings being grante
d
 to Ralph of Mortimer who even retained the bulk of the ecclesiastical holdings (HAM 29,1;3). Cypping survived to hold a subholding on the bishop's huge manor of Chilcomb (HAM 3,1); and the king granted him a respectable holding at Preston Candover, albei
t
 not as handsome as the manor he had held in the same vill before the Conquest (HAM 29,13. 69,6). This may have been a heavy-handed joke at his expense, though his situation was relatively comfortable compared to that of almost all his Anglo-Saxon peers. 
A
part from this Cypping, the name Cypping is uncommon so it is likely that the Cypping at Hazelbury in Wiltshire (67,41) was the same man. Although the holding was small and distant, this Cypping had held Hazelbury at both dates and two such survivors with
 an uncommon name is improbable when no others of that name occur within a hundred miles. See also Clarke, }{\i\insrsid11419375 English Nobility}{\insrsid11419375 
, whose list omits HAM 3,1 and WIL 67,41 and, of course, the post-Conquest holding at Preston Candover (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,42\tab COLA [* THE HUNTER *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 67,43\tab MANNINGFORD. On the probable identity of this Manningford (as Manningford Bruce), see 66,2 Manningford note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab 2 PARTS OF A MILL. See 66,2 for the other part. One would expect the
 payment for the 2 parts of the mill (12s 6d) to be twice that for the one-third in 66,2 (50d: 4s 2d), but it is three times it, which suggests that the scribe may have given the payment for the whole mill here, in error. See }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 
Domesday Geography of South-West England}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 46.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,44\tab STANTON [FITZWARREN]. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that this }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Stantone}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  lay in Highworth Hundred.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,46\tab GODRIC [* THE HUNTER *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,47\tab HILPERTON. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 See 66,3 Hilperton note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,50\tab EDRIC [* THE BLIND *]. Edric here is perhaps the same man as Edric the blind who held Hartham (67,53) in 1066 and 1086 and who is the same as Edric of Laxfield; see 67,53 Edric note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,51\tab EDWIN [* THE HUNTER *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab CHEDGLOW. So identified by }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 57. Jones, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Domesday for Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, p. 206, suggests Chicklade in Dunworth Hundred (ST9034).}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 67,52\tab DEVERILL. See 25,22 Deverill note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,53\tab EDRIC THE BLIND. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 See Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 299, who states in note 1 that he is the same as Edric of Laxfield, with reference to Douglas, }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Feudal Documents}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\insrsid11419375  xc-xcii (see also no. 168). On Edric of Laxfield, see SUF 6,305 Edric note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,55\tab EDMUND [* SON OF AIULF *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }\pard\plain \s20\ql \fi-1080\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\aspalpha\faauto\rin0\lin1080\itap0\pararsid5329606 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\insrsid11419375 \tab 
BRAMSHAW. Bramshaw Ancient Parish was divided between Wiltshire and Hampshire in the later Middle Ages, and Bramshaw was probably so divided in 1086, the Hampshire portion being unnamed. The Hampshire portion of Bramshaw will have lain in Fordingbridge Hu
n
dred. In the nineteenth century, as probably before, the boundary that divided Wiltshire from Hampshire followed the main road (the B 3079) through the centre of the village. Two separate Civil Parishes, one in each county were created in 1889 and the Wil
tshire parish transferred to Hampshire in 1895, putting the whole of Bramshaw in the latter county; see Youngs, }{\i\insrsid11419375 Local Administrative Units}{\insrsid11419375 , i. pp. 200, 532.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }\pard\plain \ql \fi-1080\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin1080\itap0\pararsid5329606 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\insrsid11419375 67,56\tab 
EDMUND [* SON OF AIULF *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab PLAITFORD. It was transferred to Hampshire in 1895.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,57\tab EDMUND [* SON OF AIULF *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab 1 VIRGATE. The manuscript has }{\i\f720\cf1\insrsid11419375 un\'e2 }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 (= }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 unam}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 accusative); Farley misprinted }
{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 una}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 nominative.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,60\tab HARDING [* SON OF ALNOTH *]. See 12,1 Harding note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,61\tab HARDING [* SON OF ALNOTH *]. See 12,1 Harding note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,62\tab HARDING [* SON OF ALNOTH *]. See 12,1 Harding note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,63\tab THORKIL }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 HOLDS [***] IN COMPTON [BASSETT]. No gap is left in the manuscript for the insertion of the amount of land}{\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 held there by Thorkil, so perhaps the }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 in }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 is a scribal error.}{\insrsid11419375 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab \tab On Compton [Bassett], see 27,2 Compton note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab THE THIRD PART OF 2 MILLS. See 27,2 and 32,3 for the other two parts.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,65\tab WULFRIC [* THE HUNTER *]. Wulfric is c}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 alled 'the hunter' in the Tax Returns for Kinwardstone Hundred. Also possibly in 67,70 in the Tax Return for 'Cawdon' Hundred, though he holds 1 \'bd
 hides jointly with a relative there.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab SHALBOURNE. See 50,1 Shalbourne note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,66\tab WULFRIC [* THE HUNTER *]. See 67,65 Wulfric note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }\pard\plain \s20\ql \fi-1080\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\aspalpha\faauto\rin0\lin1080\itap0\pararsid5329606 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\insrsid11419375 \tab TYTHERLEY. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
This estate was probably at West Tytherley which is now, in its entirety, just over the border in Hampshire. However, part is also included in Wiltshire in}{\insrsid11419375  }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, ii. p. 237a, and a p}{\insrsid11419375 art continued to be taxed in Wiltshire, in Amesbury Hundred; see }{\i\insrsid11419375 Lay Subsidy Roll (1334)}{\insrsid11419375 , p. 345. It is not clear whether there was a medieval boundary change or
 whether a portion of Tytherley remained in Wiltshire and subsequently lost its identity.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }\pard\plain \ql \fi-1080\li1080\ri0\nowidctlpar\tx1080\tx1440\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin1080\itap0\pararsid5329606 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab 
4 COUNTRYMEN HAVE IT. Referring to the plough, not the land. This is the only occurrence of the term }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 rustici }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 in Domesday Wiltshire. They were probably less prosperous villagers; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 
VCH Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ii. p. 55.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,67\tab WULFRIC [* THE HUNTER *]. See 67,65 Wulfric note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,68\tab WULFRIC [* THE HUNTER *]. See 67,65 Wulfric note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab AELLIC <OF MERE>. The name Aellic occurs three times in Domesday Book, probably representing two individuals. This tiny holding in Wiltshire seems unlikely to be connected to the distant properties Huntingdonshire (JP).}{
\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,69\tab WULFRIC [* THE HUNTER *]. See 67,65 Wulfric note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,70\tab WULFRIC [* THE HUNTER *]. See 67,65 Wulfric note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab 1 HIDE. See 67,65 Wulfric note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,71\tab WULFRIC [* THE HUNTER *]. See 67,65 Wulfric note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,72\tab WULFRIC [* THE HUNTER *]. See 67,65 Wulfric note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 67,77\tab LONGFORD. Analysis of the Tax Returns shows that this }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Langeford}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  lay in 'Cawdon' Hundred; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 221.
}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,78\tab BRAMSHAW. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 See 67,55 Bramshaw note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,79\tab WULFGEAT [* THE HUNTER *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab IN THE FOREST. The forest is Clarendon. See 13,20 forest note and 27,27 forest note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,82\tab SHALBOURNE.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  See 50,1 Shalbourne note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,90\tab HILPERTON. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 See 66,3 Hilperton note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 67,92\tab LANDFORD. Analysis of the Tax Returns shows that it lay in this }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Langeford}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  lay in 'Frustfield' Hundred; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 , pp. 386-87.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 67,93\tab VALUE 15d. Possibly }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 .xx. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 changed to }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 .xv.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 or vice versa, in the manuscript.}{
\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,94\tab SWEIN [* OF ESSEX *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,95\tab WINTERBOURNE. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 See 65,1 Winterbourne note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab PART OF A MILL. This part is complemented by other parts at Winterbourne in 65,1 and 67,36. See 65,1 Winterbourne note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 67,99\tab FOREST OF GROVELY. It lay in both 'Cadworth' Hundred and 'Branchbury' Hundred; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Rotuli Hundredorum}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, ii. pp. 233b, 244b. The remnant now appears on Ordnance Survey maps as Grovely Wood.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 67,100\tab LANG. Domesday}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Lanch}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 see Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, p. 320.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab BLUNSDON. Edward the sheriff holds Broad Blunsdon in 24,21 of which this may be a part.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 68,1\tab IN THE MANUSCRIPT there is a sign in the left margin beside this entry, with a corresponding one in the right margin above the marginal heading }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 SER VIENT' REGIS }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
on folio 73b. It could indicate that the \'bd hide held by Godescal (65,2) lay in Edington, or it could just be meant to draw attention to other holdings of the king's servants.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 68,2\tab HERVEY ^[OF WILTON]^.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  See 1,18 and 1,18 Hervey note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 68,3\tab MEADOW, 4 ACRES. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Ac' }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 (for }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 acrae}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 is vi
sible under an ink blot in the manuscript.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 68,4\tab "ARPENTS". Also 68,7-8;10. See 12,4 "arpent" note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 68,7\tab SHALBOURNE. See 50,1 Shalbourne note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 68,9\tab RALPH OF HAUVILLE. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Hauville is in the d\'e9partement of Eure, France; see Tengvik, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Old English Bynames}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 91.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab 3 HIDES AND 1 \'bd VIRGATES. In the manuscript 7 }{\i\f720\cf1\insrsid11419375 un\'e2 v' t'r\'e6 }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 is written above }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 7}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 dimid'}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 the tail of the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 7}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  extending down between }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 hid' }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 and }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 7}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 , indicating where the scribe intended it to go. When the 3 hides and 1 \'bd virgates are added to the 1 hide and 2 \'bd virgates of the other Grafton entry (68,8) a 5-hide estate is formed which would not be the case if 3 \'bd
 hides and 1 virgate were read; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 VCH Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ii. p. 166 no. 545 and note 35.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 68,12\tab [* RALPH OF HAUVILLE *]. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 No holder is actually named; probably Ralph (of Hauville) was intended.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 68,13\tab THORBERT [* SON OF CHEMBEL *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 68,14\tab CROC [* THE HUNTER *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab 1 VILLAGER. See 66,1 villager note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab EDWARD THE SHERIFF HOLDS 1 VIRGATE. The same 1 virgate 'which Croc proved ought to belong to him' is mentioned in 24,14.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 68,15\tab HERVEY [* OF WILTON *]. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Hervey of Wilton; see }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 VCH Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , ii. pp. 75, 106.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 68,16\tab THEOBALD [* THE DOCTOR *] AND }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 HUMPHREY [* THE COOK *]. Theobald and Humphrey are called respectively Theobald the doctor and Humphrey the cook in the Tax Returns for "Scipa" Hundred.}{\insrsid5329606 

\par }{\insrsid11419375 68,18\tab FRAWIN [* OF CORNWALL *]. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 He is perhaps to be identified with the Frawin of Cornwall who occurs in Pipe Roll 31 Henry I, p. 160 (Keats-Rohan, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Domesday People}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 199), unless that person was his son. He may also be the same as the Frawin who in 1086 held land in Tregony in CON 5,24,21, which is a subsection of CON 5 containing the holdings of miscellaneous thanes and minor Frenchmen etc.}
{\insrsid11419375 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab \tab Frawin occurs on seven holdings distributed between Cornwall and Sussex, and on an eighth occasion as Frawin of Kirtling among a list of Cambridg
eshire jurors. Despite the dispersed nature of these references, it is likely that seven, if not all eight, refer to one individual. A Frawin appears both as a thane with a modest holding on one of the Count of Mortain's manors in Devon in 1066 (DEV 15,47
 
thanes note) and as one of his tenants in Cornwall in 1086 (5,24,21). Given the rarity of the name, it is improbable that two individuals are involved, a significant point since it establishes the likelihood that the Frawins of 1066 and 1086 do, in fact, 
r
epresent the same name. This makes it likely that the Frawin with a modest holding in Wiltshire in 1086 (68,18) is the same man since two survivors with such a rare name is an implausible scenario. It is perhaps relevant that this holding is adjacent to t
w
o of the properties of the Count of Mortain (20,1-2). If these deductions are correct, then the three remaining holdings of Frawin in 1066 are likely to have been held by the same individual. It is perhaps unlikely that a man who may have become sheriff o
f Cornwall in the reign of Henry I (Keats Rohan, }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Domesday People}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 
, p. 199) was also a juror in Cambridgeshire in 1086; but even this cannot be confidently ruled out since, as already noted, the survival of two Anglo-Saxons with a rare name is statistically i
mprobable, the survival of three such even more so. Moreover, a man who lost one inheritance, built the nucleus of another in two different and widely separated areas, and prospered to the extent that he or his descendant could offer 300 gold marks for th
e recovery of his lands, was clearly a man who himself about (JP)}{\insrsid11419375 .}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 68,20\tab WILLIAM SHIELD. See 1,16 William note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 68,21\tab GEOFFREY [* THE MARSHAL *].}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  Called Geoffrey 'the marshal' (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 mariscalc'}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  marescal}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 )}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }
{\cf1\insrsid11419375 in the Tax Returns for Startley Hundred. Perhaps the same person as the Geoffrey the marshal in M12.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab DRAYCOT [CERNE].}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  Analysis of the Tax Returns shows that it lay in Startley Hundred.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 68,22\tab WILLIAM SON OF ANSCULF.}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  See 24,19 William note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 \tab "STRAMI". Domesday}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Strami}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Perhaps the same person as the }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Stremius}{
\cf1\insrsid11419375  in 24,19, who held Edward the sheriff's manor of Bradenstoke before 1066, of which William held 1 hide and 1 virgate in 1086.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 68,23\tab WILLIAM [* SON OF ANSCULF *]. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 William of Picquigny, son of Ansculf; see 24,19 for his holding at Bradenstoke, which is stated as 1 hide and 1 virgate. For his holding at Clyffe Pypard, see 29,5.}{
\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 68,24\tab WULFEVA }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 BETESLAU. The identification of Round (}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 VCH Hampshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , i. p. 429) of Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 beteslau }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 as
 'of Beslow' (Shropshire) is questioned by von Feilitzen, 'Personal names of the Winton Domesday', pp. 207-208. Wulfeva }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Beteslau}{\cf1\insrsid11419375  also appears in Hampshire (HAM 6,12).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab 1 COTTAGER. In the manuscript }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 i. coscez}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 with the noun in the plural form, but an attempt seems to have been made to change the }{
\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 z }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 to a }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 t}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ,}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 making the singular }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 coscet}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 .}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{
\cf1\insrsid11419375 See M3 Cottagers note.}{\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 68,27\tab SMALLBROOK. }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Place-Names of Wiltshire}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 , p. 133, identifies Smallbrook in Staverton, but an analysis of the Tax Returns suggests that it lay in Warminster Hundred.}{
\cf1\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 68,28\tab DEVERILL. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 See 25,22 Deverill note.}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 68,31\tab CROC [* THE HUNTER *]. Note on this identification to be supplied (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 68,32\tab AEFIC <OF WISHFORD>. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 Domesday }{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375 Auitius}{\cf1\insrsid11419375 ;}{\i\cf1\insrsid11419375  }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 see }{\insrsid11419375 von Feilitzen, }{\i\insrsid11419375 
Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book}{\insrsid11419375 , p. }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 172.}{\insrsid11419375 
\par }{\cf1\insrsid11419375 \tab \tab }{\insrsid11419375 The name Aefic occurs six times in Domesday Book, distributed between three counties. The distance between the counties, the modest size of all six holdings (none worth more than \'a3
3), and their acquisition by different Norman tenants-in-chief, makes it probable that the Aefics of the three counties were unrelated. The Wiltshire Aefic had just the one holding in Wishford (JP).}{\insrsid5329606 
\par }{\insrsid11419375 
\par }}